If you still trust “mainstream” doctors after reading these four stories, then may God help you February 3, 2022 TheCOVIDBlog.com

A July survey by British market research firm OnePoll answers an important question. Why has this sloppy, so-called pandemic been so successful at duping seemingly-intelligent people into oblivion? The survey found that 88% of Brits trust their doctors’ advice completely or most of the time. They especially trust pediatric doctors, with 94% saying they mostly or completely believe and have faith in said doctors.

Of course since 2020, politics has entered doctors offices. A December 2021 Pew survey found that 71% of self-identified American Democrats trust their doctors, up from 68% in 2010. Only 60% of self-identified Republicans had those sentiments, down from 73% in 2010. Seemingly-intelligent people are far too indoctrinated to think otherwise despite all the revelations regarding the medical industry since 2020.

The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services website says in plain English that doctors receive $40 for every COVID-19 “vaccine” they administer. That means doctors make $120 for every patient who receives three injections in their offices. U.S. primary care physicians have anywhere from 1,200 to 2,500 regular patients.

Using the average of about 1,800 patients, American doctors made up to $216,000 each in extra income last year if they talked all of their patients into receiving three shots. Further, the Biden Administration announced in December that Medicaid will pay doctors to talk parents into getting their kids injected.

There is clear financial incentive for doctors to push the poisonous injections. Doctors are also paid handsomely for classifying all sicknesses and deaths as “COVID-19.” Even the so-called “fact checkers” couldn’t twist and propagandize the fact that doctors are paid anywhere from $13,000 to $39,000 for treating so-called COVID-19 patients. COVID-19 is a literal gold mine for doctors.

RELATED: Peer-reviewed manuscript concludes that CDC massively inflates COVID-19 case and death numbers with creative statistics (February 12, 2021)

The indoctrinated are unlikely to see the light. But said light is so blinding right now that only the willfully, wantonly ignorant cannot see it.

D.J. Ferguson denied heart transplant for being non-vaccinated

Mr. D.J. Ferguson is a husband, father of two and expecting another child. He is in “severe-stage heart failure,” according to his GoFundMe page. He’s been at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston since November after a congenital heart defect caused blood and other fluids to accumulate in his lungs. The only thing that will save him is a heart transplant. Despite being at the front of the line for a heart transplant, Brigham and Women’s Hospital removed Mr. Ferguson, 31, from the transplant list. The reason – he refuses to receive mRNA and/or viral vector DNA injections.

These doctors want Mr. Ferguson to take an injection that causes heart inflammation and other cardiac issues, before he receives a heart transplant. ABC 5 in Boston dug up some guy named Dr. Arthur Caplan not only to insult Mr. Ferguson, but also play head cheerleader for Pfizer. The “journalists” facilitated all the newspeak and refused to acknowledge, at the very least, the 20,000-plus posst-injection deaths reported to VAERS.

Mr. Ferguson had emergency open-heart surgery last week to insert a left ventricular assist device.

Many patients live up to five years with said device. But the family is still trying to find a real medical facility to perform the heart transplant. They also fear moving Mr. Ferguson at all due to his advanced condition, as it may make things worse.

Chad Carswell denied kidney transplant because he’s non-vaccinated

Mr. Chad Carswell is a double-amputee who has undergone several heart surgeries in his life. He needs a kidney transplant immediately to prolong his life. Mr. Carswell currently undergoes dialysis three times per week to keep him alive.

RELATED: Mark Ruston: British man temporarily banned from Facebook after sharing gruesome photo of post-AstraZeneca, baseball-sized blood clot in his arm (January 28, 2022)

Mr. Carswell found 100 people willing to donate a kidney. But Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Hospital in Winston-Salem, North Carolina refuses to do the transplant surgery because Mr. Carswell is non-vaccinated. The hospital’s reason for refusing to save this man’s life is that “transplant patients are at high-risk of severe illness if they [don’t get the vaccine].” Hospital officials failed to speak about the obvious risks associated with receiving the mRNA and viral vector DNA injections.

“I was born free, and I will die free,” the laudable Mr. Carswell said.

He said on a podcast earlier this week that he was also on the Duke University Hospital (Durham, North Carolina) transplant list. But they are also refusing to save Mr. Carswell’s life because he won’t take their injections.

Queensland doctor receives death threats after two young girls suffer post-injection convulsions

Dr. Wilson Chin is a general practitioner at MedCenters Pacific Pines (Gold Coast) in Queensland, Australia. Two girls under age 12 “fainted” after receiving Pfizer mRNA injections administered at MedCenters on January 17, according to Dr. Chin’s own account of the events via Nine News Gold Coast. It’s unclear if Dr. Chin or someone else actually administered the shots. He dismissed said adverse reactions as “normal episodes…like a full-grown man would have [fainted].” Dr. Chin also said that the girls fainting was not an adverse reaction to the injections, despite them “fainting” within minutes after the shots.

Witnesses told a completely different story on Facebook. Most of the original witness accounts have since been deleted. But the story quickly went viral, and many others re-posted the witness accounts. One of the girls “hands and face suddenly tightened, her neck muscles were straining, and she started convulsing,” the witness said. A nurse was screaming at Dr. Chin to “do something.” Less than a minute later, the other girl started convulsing. The mother was screaming “I’m sorry, I’m sorry” at her daughters as they convulsed and seized on the floor.

We contacted the original witness who posted the account. Here is what he told us:

“One of the girls dropped and started convulsing. Then the second girl dropped to the ground in a similar fashion. I need to be really clear, the girls did not die as far as we are aware. The story has been twisted from my original post. Please do not target the doctor, he did his best on the day to help. I don’t believe he administered the needle. If you want to target anyone, target the [Therapeutic Goods Administration] TGA who are fully funded by pharmaceutical companies and who have told everyone these are safe vaccines.”

The backlash was swift and harsh for Dr. Chin. He took to Facebook for the first time in over five years to Pfizer-splain what happened. He said to the girls’ parents, “I honestly wish you never had to endure any of this in the first place.”

Dr. Chin called on Nine News reporter MacKenzie Colahan to try and spin the story further. Colahan and his crew called the witnesses “online trolls” and their accounts “misinformation.”

Dr. Chin has since stopped giving Pfizer mRNA injections to kids under age 12.

Maine doctor has medical license suspended, ordered to receive psychiatric evaluation for curing COVID-19 patients with Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine

Dr. Meryl Nass.

There are currently 147 studies, including 96 peer-reviewed studies, proving that Ivermectin is both a very effective COVID-19 treatment and prophylaxis. Hydroxychloroquine has 311 studies, with 229 peer-reviewed, showing similar effectiveness against so-called COVID-19. Dr. Meryl Nass, an internist in Ellsworth, Maine, followed this science and treated per sick patients accordingly. But the MIT-educated doctor quickly learned that U.S. medicine is not about science or health.

The Maine Board of Licensure in Medicine suspended Dr. Nass’ license to practice medicine in Maine for 30 days. The suspension started on January 11. In a nutshell, it says Dr. Nass was “spreading misinformation” and inappropriately treating patients with Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. The treatments are inappropriate because the CDC and FDA has not authorized the two drugs for COVID-19 treatment.

The board also ordered Dr. Nass, 70, to “submit to a neuropsychological evaluation by a Board-selected psychologist on February 1, 2022.” She is a “danger to the public,” according to the board. Click to read the full suspension document and psychological evaluation order.

Take charge of your health

The global cancer industry will be worth over a half-trillion dollars annually by 2028. It works in very much the same way as the COVID-19 industry, with vaccines alone being worth $150 billion. That doesn’t include masks, tests, gloves, etc. But here’s how it works.

This blogger mentioned his ex-girlfriend in a previous post. She was a perfectly-healthy woman until doctors “told her” she was sick and was going to die – unless she got a double mastectomy, implant reconstruction and radiation. That morphed into perpetual treatments and drugs that she’ll need for the rest of her life. She is now a $150,000 commodity for big pharma. She’s also a shell of what she once was physically, mentally and emotionally.

Same thing with COVID-19. Everyone is told they are sick, or will get sick and die without mRNA and viral vector DNA injections. Then said people are permanently maimed and need more treatment (more doctor bills); or the doctors can simply diagnose the patient with “COVID-19” right before said patient dies, and receive $13,000 or more for the “COVID death.”

COVID-19 was a literal “come-up” for doctors in 2021, as articulated above. It’s a global racket for big pharma and its partners. It all reminds this blogger of “The Homeboy Seminar” from the 1990s variety show In Living Color.

It’s really not a laughing matter. But what else is there to do at this point? Avoid doctors at all costs, unless it’s Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Lee Merritt, Dr. Carrie Madej, Dr. Stella Immanuel, Dr. Charles Hoffe, Dr. Peter McCullough, and the many other brave, honorable doctors out there holding up their Hippocratic Oaths. Unfortunately these doctors make up less than 5% of the total industry.

Quercetin, zinc, Vitamin D, Vitamin C and CoQ10 should be in the households of every critical thinker in 2022. It’s probably a scary thought for lifelong white coat god worshipers to stop paying insurance premiums and divesting of that genocidal industry. Just think of all the money you’ll save.

This is literally a matter of life and death. We’re all going to die. But go down standing up, not lying in a hospital bed dying of medical malpractice.

Stay vigilant and protect your friends and loved ones.

Megan Wolff: 53-year-old, triple-vaxxed Manitoba teacher dies of “sudden, intense illness” on Christmas Day; mainstream media shamelessly blame COVID-19 January 25, 2022 TheCOVIDBlog.com

WINNIPEG — A beloved 53-year-old nursery school teacher and mother of two is dead; and mainstream media are using her death to reinforce government propaganda and suppress truth.

Ms. Megan Lee Wolff (aka Megan Kirbyson) was a nursery school teacher at J.B. Mitchell School in Winnipeg. Nursery school is the equivalent of preschool and/or daycare (3 to 4-year-olds) in the United States. She held the position for nearly 10 years. It was her lifelong dream to become a teacher and nurture young children. But so-called COVID-19 hampered her ability to teach over the last 20-plus months.

Play-based learning was Ms. Wolff’s teaching style, according to a report in the Winnipeg Free Press. Reporter Maggie Macintosh said Ms. Wolff closely interacted with her students and often took them on field trips. But Ms. Wolff’s passion for teaching was tested in 2020 and 2021. She had new responsibilities, including “social distancing” unmasked kids and trying to convey her lessons via remote, online platforms.

Manitoba shut down all schools on March 31, 2020. In-person classes finally resumed on Tuesday, September 8, 2020, with a bunch of caveats. Masks, staggered lunches and recesses were now the norm. Once the mRNA and viral vector DNA injections came to the market, even more dystopian rules were implemented.

Mandatory injections and Christmas death

The Manitoba provincial government issued a vaccine mandate for all public servants, including teachers, in September 2021. The mandate took effect on October 18. All non-vaccinated teacher or staff member who come in contact with others must submit to “regular testing.” It unclear when Ms. Wolff received her injections. But the Winnipeg Free Press reported that she had received “three doses of COVID-19 vaccine.”

Boosters were only made available to all Manitoba adults in November. Further, the Manitoba government requires six months between the second injection and a booster. Thus Ms. Wolff received her second injection on or before June 1, 2021 in order to be eligible for a booster in November or December 2021. But based on similar stories we’ve covered on this blog, she most likely received the booster just days before Christmas.

Ms. Wolff experienced “flu-like symptoms” on Monday, December 20. She was unable to work for the last few days of school before the Christmas Break due to the severity of her illness. Ms. Wolff checked into Grace Hospital the next day. Doctors (of course) diagnosed her with “COVID-19.” She went into cardiac arrest at St. Boniface Hospital on Wednesday, December 23, and had a “severe immune response.” Despite this entire episode checking all the boxes of a post-booster shot death, reporter Macintosh refused to state this obvious fact.

Ms. Wolff passed away on December 25. Her obituary says she died of “a sudden, intense illness following a COVID diagnosis.” Reporter Macintosh also failed to include this vital detail in the story. Ms. Wolff is survived by both parents, her twin sister, younger brother and her two children. Anyone who would like to honor Ms. Wolff’s memory can donate to the Winnipeg School Division Children’s Heritage Fund in care of J.B. Mitchell School.

RIP mainstream journalism

As post-injection deaths accelerate in 2022, expect more so-called “COVID-19 deaths” to cover the truth.

This story is very similar to that of University of Georgia student Shawn Kuhn. He received his second Pfizer injection in May 2021, after already acquiring natural immunity to so-called COVID-19. The healthy, fit, 21-year-old died on October 11, from what mainstream and university media called “COVID pneumonia.”

Dr. Sohrab Lutchmedial, after mocking the non-vaxxed, died on November 7, two weeks after his booster injection. Mainstream media did not even mention the booster shot in their stories about the Canadian doctor. They simply said he “died in his sleep.”

Once again, another so-called journalist failed in their duty to report the facts. Macintosh did not need to say Ms. Wolff died from the booster. But she was in communication with the family. She not only could have obtained the exact date and location of the booster, but also could have referenced some of the blatantly-obvious booster deaths this blog has covered. Macintosh also could have called and placed whomever administered the shot on the hot seat.

RELATED: Jennifer Livingston: Wisconsin news anchor posts photos of whole family receiving injections, news anchor husband Mike Thompson hospitalized days later, blames COVID-19 (November 28, 2021)

This blogger knew by age 25, in the early 2000s, that he was not going to make it in mainstream media. Program directors literally instruct you on what on-air “character” to play and sometimes even gave you scripts to read for certain breaking news stories (e.g. 9/11) instead of letting you ad-lib.

RELATED: Georgia Clark: 27-year-old Australian reporter hospitalized with pericarditis 10 days after Pfizer injection, encourages others to still get the injections

Radio broadcasting was this blogger’s childhood dream. Be the next Casey Kasem announcing the American Top 40 (even though most music is trash in 2022). Carve out your own news and reporting niche a la Edward R. Murrow. Radio, however, is considered “show business”; and you must sell your soul if you want to participate.

Ms. Wolff will die in vain because a cookie-cutter journalist failed to place truth over job. Yes, that’s a difficult ask for anyone. But don’t get into the profession if your only goal is to look cute on camera or spew propaganda for a paycheck. Ms.Wolff, from all accounts, was a genuinely good human being. Mainstream media, the de-facto fourth branch of government, failed her on every level.

Stop paying for cable and satellite television. Never pay to read corporate online “news” behind paywalls. All you’re doing is supporting propaganda.

Stay vigilant and protect your friends and loved ones.

Ventavia Whistleblower Lawsuit Takes Pfizer & CROs to Court for Allegations of Fraud & Data Manipulation Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine TrialSite Staff

Last year, a whistleblower lawsuit was filed with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Beaumont Division targeting Pfizer as a defendant. Filed by the plaintiff/Relator Brook Jackson, ex rel, the lawsuit alleges that Pfizer and two contract research organizations including ICON, Plc, and Ventavia Research Group LLC, committed egregious civil wrongs under the Federal False Claims Act. Although the case was filed quietly last year, there was little coverage associated with the actual lawsuit. Associated with the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine called BNT162b2 (Comirnaty), the Texas whistleblower allegations were tracked by TrialSite, as well as the British Medical Journal (The BMJ); that prestigious medical journal was even censored by Facebook fact-checkers for reporting on the allegations of data manipulation and fraud associated with the whistleblower from Ventavia. If these allegations turn out to be true, the implications are frankly explosive for Pfizer, which has generated record revenues for the distribution of the COVID-19 vaccine. Not to mention for the federal government, which not only formally approved the vaccine but also issued mandates, forcing vaccinations as mandatory for employment, for example, in health care systems that received federal funding. 

Demanding a jury trial, the plaintiff/relator Brook Jackson bought this action under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729–3732, seeking to recover damages, penalties, and other possible remedies associated with this Act on behalf of the United States of America as well as on her own behalf totaling at least $2 billion.

What is the case?

Ms. Jackson comes up with over a dozen claims, which TrialSite breaks down in the table below:

Subscribe to the Trialsitenews "COVID-19" Channel

No spam - we promise

Defendants in a race to test the COVID-19 vaccine candidate “withheld crucial information from the U.S. government that raises material concerns of vaccine safety and efficacy. The Defendants concealed violations of both their clinical trial protocol and federal regulations, including falsification of clinical trial documents.”

Due to this claimed civil wrong, millions of Americans have received a misbranded vaccination, which is potentially not as effective as represented. The vaccine’s U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) authorization resulted from a deeply flawed clinical trial that violated FDA regulations. Defendants have profited from the COVID-19 pandemic at the expense of the United States and its citizens by abusing the scientific process.

Pfizer was able to secure $1.95 billion in U.S. federal procurements for the vaccine initially developed by BioNTech called BNT162b2.

This deal was based on a successful Phase 1 trial sponsored by BioNTech. The U.S. Federal gov. acquired 100 million doses.

Like many clinical trials, Pfizer delegated trial responsibilities to CROs, including ICON, a well-known Irish clinical trial outsourcing company.

ICON was responsible for recruiting and onboarding 160 trial sites worldwide ensuring trial protocol compliance and reporting including oversight of any Serious Adverse Events (SAE)—required by the study protocol, federal regulations, and international standards (e.g., GcP). Yet, Pfizer is ultimately responsible.

Ventavia Research Group, LLC, a named Defendant, was contracted by Pfizer to provide Phase 3 test sites for the vaccine trial in Houston, Fort Worth, and Keller, Texas.

This CRO (Ventavia) ultimately enrolled 1,500 patients for the trial. It was Ventavia that employed the Relator (Plaintiff) Brook Jackson serving the study as Regional Director. As such, the Relator was tasked with overseeing the trial site management, patient enrollment, quality, and event reporting, including corrective action plans, communication with management, and staff training at the three Texas-based trial sites.

Pfizer, aiming for the title of “first successful COVID-19 vaccine,” pushed Ventavia to enroll as many patients as possible in the vaccine trial as quickly as possible. Ventavia was compensated by Pfizer mainly on a per-patient basis—up to a weekly limit.

Jackson claims that this pressure to enroll combined with the payment incentive led to “sloppy and fraudulent documentation practices, poor clinical trial protocol compliance, and little oversight.” Did Pfizer and ICON turn a blind eye to Ventavia’s misconduct? The Plaintiff/Relator suggests there were plenty of warning signs that should have been noticed.

Relator/Plaintiff alleges in lawsuit widespread regulatory violations during her period of employment. Those observations included:
• fabrication and falsification of blood draw information, vital signs, signatures and other essential clinical trial data;
• enrollment and injection of ineligible clinical trial participants, including Ventavia employees’ family members;
• failure to timely remove ineligible patients’ data from the trial;
• failure to maintain temperature control for the vaccine at issue;
• failure to monitor patients after injection as required by the trial protocol;
• principal investigator oversight failures;
• use of unqualified and untrained personnel as vaccinators and laboratory personnel;
• failure to maintain the “blind” as required, which is essential to the credibility and validity of the observer-blinded clinical trial;
• ethical violations, such as failure to secure informed consent and giving patients unapproved compensation;
• improper injection of the vaccine (i.e., by over-diluting vaccine concentrate or using the wrong needle size);
• failure to ensure that trial site staff were properly trained as required by good clinical practices;
• safety and confidentiality issues, including HIPAA violations; and
• other violations of the clinical trial protocol, FDA regulations, and Federal Acquisition Regulations and their DoD supplements These allegations, if proven true, represent an egregious violation of federal compliance rules and violation of GcP principles.

Ventavia failed to report most of its clinical trial protocol and regulatory violations to Pfizer or the external Institutional Review Board. Issues were improperly documented or hidden away in “notes to the file,” and not corrected.

Icon and Pfizer communicated with each trial site to monitor compliance, but failed to follow up on missing information, ignored “red flags” of trial protocol violations and false data, and failed to exclude ineligible participants from the trial data. In Pfizer’s rush to be the “first,” it failed to address violations that compromised its entire clinical trial, including those raised by Relator. This resulted in Pfizer withholding material information from the United States and submitting false data and records in its clinical trial results.

The whistleblower turned Plaintiff (Relator) Jackson claims that she continuously raises her concerns and observations to the management of Ventavia. Moreover, later on, the Plaintiff reported the problems to Pfizer as well.

What was the response? According to the Plaintiff, Ventavia ignored these serious allegations and started to harass Jackson instead. They terminated her for submitting reports in what the Plaintiff claims is an effort to perpetrate a fraud against the United States Department of Defense. Pfizer opted not to do anything with the Plaintiff’s reports.

While the Plaintiff’s observations were associated only with Texas-based trial sites, such mishaps, fraud, and concealment of blatant violations (if proven to be true) raise questions about the entire study.

Is it reasonable to assume that comparable activities were occurring at other trial sites? The Plaintiff suggests so.

By December 11, 2020, the FDA issued EUA to Pfizer-BioNTech for the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. DOD was a sponsor.

However, the Plaintiff claims that this decision was based on “falsified clinical trial results” in addition to the cover-up of vital trial information. The Plaintiff claims the DoD had purchased misbranded vaccines from Pfizer because they relied on the trial sponsor’s “fraudulent misrepresentations.” If the Plaintiff is correct, the trial wasn’t properly conducted.

The Plaintiff thus declares that if not for Pfizer, ICON, and Ventavia’s “fraudulent scheme,” the DOD would not have paid billions.

The Plaintiff declares that the U.S. Federal Gov (DOD) was bilked via fraud, misrepresentation, and obfuscation in a blatant violation of federal compliance laws. Meanwhile, the Defendants, especially Pfizer, have enjoyed windfall profits based on record-breaking revenue of around $30 billion in the first 12 months of the EUA.

TrialSite will continue to monitor this lawsuit. An interview of the Plaintiff can be viewed here. Check out the actual lawsuit here. The case can be accessed via Law360.comhere.

Autopsies Key to Explaining COVID Vaccine Deaths Joel S Hirschhorn

Imagine parents finding their teenage sons dead in their beds in the morning with no prior indications that they were seriously ill.  Imagine the heartache of parents who bought into the coercion and propaganda to get their kids vaccinated despite all the CDC data showing little risk of serious health impacts from COVID for children.  Now, their kids died in their sleep shortly after getting the shots.

Note that an excellent article in June 2021 was titled: “If Covid-19 vaccines can cause heart inflammation, caution should be warranted in those at risk.”  It said this: “Although most cases reported to date are mild and resolve without consequence, myocarditis can be a serious condition.  It can cause severe declines in cardiac function; require hospitalization, artificial heart pumps, or even heart transplants; and may even be fatal.”  The physician authors noted “Yet as health care providers, we should not give the impression of minimizing serious complications like myocarditis in potentially at-risk individuals.”  But who is at risk?  It now seems clear that young males are at risk.  Less clear is which adults are at risk, except we know it is men who are at most risk.

Subscribe to the Trialsitenews "Vaccine" Channel

No spam - we promise

A recent medical article presented data on the frequency of myocarditis; here are its findings: “In this descriptive study of 1626 cases of myocarditis in a national passive reporting system, the crude reporting rates within 7 days after vaccination exceeded the expected rates across multiple age and sex strata.  The rates of myocarditis cases were highest after the second vaccination dose in adolescent males aged 12 to 15 years (70.7 per million doses of the [Pfizer] vaccine), in adolescent males aged 16 to 17 years (105.9 per million doses of the [Pfizer] vaccine), and in young men aged 18 to 24 years (52.4 and 56.3 per million doses of the [Pfizer] vaccine and the [Moderna] vaccine, respectively).  … This risk should be considered in the context of the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination.”  But the benefits are minimal for healthy young people.

A compelling study

A recent detailed medical study was entitled “Autopsy Histopathologic Cardiac Findings in Two Adolescents Following The Second COVID-19 Vaccine Dose.”  There have been many “messages” from the government and various medical establishment entities that post COVID vaccine myocarditis was not something to be very concerned about.  But CDC VAERS data has revealed many such health impacts, especially in young boys or teenagers.

This article is so important because its detailed studies allow a definitive conclusion to be made that it was COVID vaccine shots that was the cause of the death of two teenage boys.

This article is written for medical professionals and, therefore, it is very difficult reading for non-medical people.  Here is a summary of the key points made in the article.

Two teenage boys whose ages were not revealed died “suddenly and unexpectedly in their sleep” within the first week after receiving the second dose of the Pfizer COVID vaccine.  They were found dead in their bed 3 and 4 days after vaccination.  Both boys were pronounced dead at their homes.  Both had not had COVID infection.  And both did not have serious underlying medical conditions.  Though one boy was obese.

They did not have cardiac symptoms.  Neither boy complained of fever, chest pain, palpitations or dyspnea (shortness of breath).

Detailed autopsies were performed by medical examiners.  The detailed studies indicated that there had been an excessive inflammatory response that resulted in myocarditis.  The myocarditis that was found was deemed atypical.

Testing was done on tissues and no evidence of the COVID virus was found.

Another medical study

Another recently reported study reported “two cases of histologically confirmed myocarditis after Covid-19 mRNA vaccination.”  One person survived, a woman, but the other did not.

The patient that died was a 42-year-old man who presented with dyspnea and chest pain 2 weeks after receiving the Moderna vaccine (second dose). He did not report a viral symptom, and a PCR test was negative for COVID.  He had tachycardia and a fever, and his electrocardiogram showed something abnormal as did an echocardiogram.  But coronary angiography revealed no coronary artery disease.  Cardiogenic shock developed in the patient, and he died 3 days after presentation.  An autopsy revealed biventricular myocarditis

Yet another myocarditis death

In this news story, the death of a young man was described.  A 24-old man in New York died after several visits to an emergency room did not resolve his symptoms.  He had received the Pfizer vaccine some weeks earlier.  He got his shots so he could attend college in person.  Before his death “he began coughing up blood and experienced pain in his feet, hands, and teeth.  He also became extremely sensitive to sunlight.”  He had no underlying medical conditions.  The story noted: An autopsy report from the Bradford County Coroner’s Office shows George Jr. died from “COVID-19 vaccine-related myocarditis.  “The cause of death is the COVID-19 vaccine-related myocarditis,” Timothy Cahill Jr., Chief Deputy Coroner for Bradford County, said.

South Korea case

This was reported in 2021: “We present autopsy findings of a 22-year-old man who developed chest pain 5 days after the first dose of the [Pfizer] vaccine and died 7 hours later.  Histological examination of the heart revealed isolated atrial myocarditis, with neutrophil and histiocyte predominance.  … There was no evidence of microthrombosis or infection in the heart and other organs.  The primary cause of death was determined to be myocarditis, causally-associated with the [Pfizer] vaccine.  … This is the first case in South Korea that the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention acknowledged the causality of COVID-19 vaccination and myocarditis. This unique case provides an example of a serious adverse event following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination.  It is unknown whether this case is related to the vaccine type or to a specific vaccine component.”

Allergic reaction and death from COVID vaccine shot

Besides myocarditis another vaccine risk is an allergic reaction, often very quickly after a shot.  A case where an autopsy proved the causality was recently reported.  The article was titled: “Woman Died of Allergic Reaction to COVID Vaccine, Autopsy Confirms.”  Noted was that “Jeanie Evans, 68, died on March 24, one day after she received the Moderna vaccine.”  “About 20 minutes later, she started to complain that her airway was obstructed.”  Also noted: “The 68-year-old reportedly had a history of hypertension, allergic disorder, environmental allergies, and reactive airway disease.  She previously had an allergic reaction to Albuterol, a drug used to treat wheezing and shortness of breath, according to the autopsy report.”

The article also noted: “Anaphylaxis, a severe life-threatening allergic reaction, after a COVID-19 vaccination has occurred in about 5 per 1 million vaccinated people in the United States, according to the CDC.  But are the people giving the shots capable of predicting who is at significant risk of a deadly allergic reaction?  Moreover, CDC says “healthcare providers can effectively and immediately treat the reaction.”  But can this always be assured considering the diverse vaccination locations?

It also gave this balanced view: “Adverse reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine have taken center stage in the argument against vaccine mandates.  Some have said that such effects aren’t getting enough attention amid the push to increase vaccinations.  Others, however, argue that the risk of dying from COVID-19 far exceeds the risk of having a serious complication from the vaccine.”  Which side are you on?  Can most people reasonably estimate their risk from COVID vaccine shots?

An atrocious case

In Utah, a 39-year-old single mom from Ogden, Kassidi Kurill, died four days after her second dose of the Moderna COVID vaccine.  She had been healthy and got vaccinated because of her job in a medical facility.  On the day she died “She came in early and said her heart was racing and she felt like she needed to get to the emergency room,” said her father.  She asked her dad to drive her to the local emergency room, where they arrived by 7 a.m.  Later she was transferred to a higher-level trauma hospital because her liver was not functioning.  Eventually, days later she died of multi-organ failure.

Though there was an autopsy eventually, the state medical examiner never pinpointed a cause of death. As reported, “Dr. Erik Christensen, Utah’s chief Medical Examiner, said proving vaccine injury as a cause of death almost never happens.”  “Did the vaccine cause this? I think that would be very hard to demonstrate in autopsy,” he said.  Also, “Short of [an allergic reaction], it would be difficult for us to definitively say this is the vaccine.”  All these comments are nonsense and gave the family no satisfaction.  Based on much medical research on vaccine induced impacts on bodies, a plausible explanation of the death might have been intense micro blood clotting affecting all the major organs.

Conclusions

The main point is that people really are dying because of COVID vaccine shots.  In some cases, there are no symptoms acting as a warning of a deadly outcome.

It is often argued by pro-vaccine people that no causality has been proven between COVID vaccine shots and subsequent deaths.  That is not true.  Autopsies are critically important.  Timing by itself does not prove causality.  The CDC’s position is: “Reports of adverse events to VAERS following vaccination, including deaths, do not necessarily mean that a vaccine caused a health problem.”

One can only imagine how many thousands of post vaccine deaths could have been shown to be caused by vaccine shots if detailed, first-rate autopsies had been done and the results made public.  Word is seeping out that hospitals are persuading families of their dead loved ones to cremate their bodies to avoid autopsies.

Note that a new analysis concludes: “As of 6 February 2022, based on publicly available official UK and US data, all age groups under 50 years old are at greater risk of fatality after receiving a COVID-19 inoculation than an unvaccinated person is at risk of a COVID-19 death. All age groups under 80 years old have virtually no benefit from receiving a COVID-19 inoculation, and the younger ages incur significant risk.”

This review shows that it is time for vaccine coercion and mandates to stop.  The truth is that vaccine shots are not always safe.

Dr. Joel S. Hirschhorn, author of Pandemic Blunder and many articles and podcasts on the pandemic, worked on health issues for decades, and his Pandemic Blunder Newsletter is on Substack. As a full professor at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, he directed a medical research program between the colleges of engineering and medicine. As a senior official at the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment and the National Governors Association, he directed major studies on health-related subjects; he testified at over 50 US Senate and House hearings and authored hundreds of articles and op-ed articles in major newspapers. He has served as an executive volunteer at a major hospital for more than 10 years. He is a member of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, and America’s Frontline Doctors.

Soros-Backed Prosecutor Seeks Collaboration of Financial Sector to Push Gun Control TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2022

Why would someone who abhors the criminal justice system run for its highest office in the most populous county in the United States?

By the looks of things in Los Angeles, the answer is to pursue a radical political agenda and to turn the full weight of a very large and powerful bureaucracy against its principal’s political and ideological enemies.

Earlier this month, Los Angeles County Prosecutor George Gascón sent letters to American Express, Visa, and Mastercard, urging them to ban use of their platforms for the online purchase of what the letters called “ghost gun kits.” The letters did not define this term in detail, but the effort is clearly aimed at products that allow consumers to make their own firearms for personal use, a practice that is lawful under federal law and dates back to the founding of the country.

Gascón has made it his business to use the sweeping power of his office to “reimagine” law enforcement … mainly by refusing to enforce laws against criminals ravaging the local community. He was supported in his bid for office by George Soros, an international financier notorious for spending huge amounts of money to remake institutions worldwide in his own globalist image.  

The results of this experiment speak for themselves, with homicides in Los Angeles spiking by nearly 12% over 2020 during Gascón’s first year in office, but by a horrific 46.7% compared to 2019.

Meanwhile, images from the aftermath of train robberies in Los Angeles – a true throwback to the Wild West if ever there was one – caused even California’s uber-liberal governor to remark that the scene looked like it was from “a third world country.”

Among the items stolen from the trains were dozens and dozens of brand new pistols and semiautomatic shotguns. Local officials blamed gangs for the thefts.

Predictably, those hit hardest by these trends are in the very communities a “progressive” like Gascón claim to champion.

So undeniable and troubling is Los Angeles’ resurgent crime problem that even an article late last year in the New York Times asked the question whether the radical prosecutor has gone “too far” in his effort to keep criminals out of prison.

Now -- with other reliably soft on crime entities forced to scrutinize his agenda, methods, and results -- Gascón is trying to make different headlines by reaching beyond the law to crack down on one highly contentious area of Second Amendment activity: homemade firearms.

There are all kinds of motivations that have driven Americans to make their own guns throughout the nation’s history. Certainly not the least of these reasons is to exercise their rights away from the prying eyes of zealots in public office like Gascón, who typically want all firearms and firearm owners registered and catalogued. Among other things, this helps with retroactive enforcement of newly-passed gun control laws, like California’s ban on so-called “large capacity” magazines. It’s quite a neat trick for gun control advocates: turning formerly law-abiding gun owners into newly-minted criminals with the stroke of a pen.

It’s no wonder, then, that the phenomenon of homemade, unserialized firearms is receiving special attention from Gascón and his fellow travelers in the firearm prohibition movement, not the least of which includes the current occupant of the White House.

It’s also unsurprising that Gascón is taking a page from the Obama/Biden Administration’s Operation Choke Point playbook by trying to enlist the financial sector to do what the government has been unable to do itself, i.e., choke off the lifeblood of activities it doesn’t like, whether they are legal or not.

The Obama/Biden effort was aimed at the sales of firearms and ammunition writ large, especially when it involved online commerce, suggesting to banks that this was “high risk” activity and could subject them to being put through the regulatory ringer, with all the expense and bad publicity that entailed. Many large banks got the message and began exiting these lines of business entirely, leaving lawful and creditworthy firearm- and ammunition-related businesses to scramble for the financing and services they needed to survive.

As this scheme was brought to light, the administration at least had enough shame to try to deny it, insisting that it was simply a misunderstanding on the banks’ part of legitimate regulatory guidance and that anyone who suggested otherwise was spreading conspiracy theories.

But times change, and now Gascón is pursuing his effort openly and notoriously, hoping not only to inflict a mortal wound on a sector of gun culture with entirely legitimate applications but to shift blame for his own policy failures and to change the public narrative around rampaging crime in Los Angeles.

Gascón admits in his letters that the legal status of the products he seeks to target is in flux and that there is “no evidence” that attempts by localities like Los Angeles to deal with it through ordinances of their own “will make a meaningful dent in the proliferation of ghost guns.”

 The letters, however, continue:

Our purpose in writing to you today is not to recruit you in a legal debate on the merits of these legal cases or the enforceability of these laws. … [T]here is a difference between what may or may not be technically legal and possible and what is most assuredly wrong. It is to your company’s sense of right and wrong to which we now appeal.

In other words, Gascón wants to convince the companies they have a moral responsibility beyond what is actually defined by the law to see things his way. And, although he doesn’t say so explicitly, that suggestion carries the same implicit threat of Operation Chokepoint: that the companies are subjecting themselves to who-knows-what kinds of regulatory and public relations nightmares by not being sufficiently “right” in the eyes of their overlords. 

The globalist outlook that George Soros personifies seeks to merge nations, governments, businesses, educational institutions, technology companies, and media outlets into a common enterprise of advancing a transnational system of elite authority with absolute power to enforce its dictates.

Nothing could be more opposed to this project than the American tradition and spirit of independence, self-reliance, self-governance, and exceptionalism, as personified in the Second Amendment.

Simply put, the two schools of thought cannot be reconciled. One will win. One will lose.

To date, it does not appear that any of the credit card companies has publicly responded to Gascón’s “request.”

But there is little doubt that the corporate culture that will form these decisions, now and in the future, is trending in Gascón’s direction and away from traditional American values.

Yet the unification of business with globalist governance is not yet complete, particularly in the U.S. American consumers still hold considerable sway with their purchasing decisions and the pressure they can bring to bear through the free market.

Americans should not ignore attempts by overreaching officials like Gascón to politicize private service providers on which everyone is forced, to one degree or another, to rely. 

More and more, it will be beholden on gun owners to broaden their activism and awareness beyond the political realm and into the increasingly centralized business sphere on which modern life depends.

Brutal Trudeau regime tramples elderly with war horses Saturday, February 19, 2022 by: Mike Adams

In an incident now being described as Canada's "Tiananmen Square" -- referring to communist China's brutal 1989 massacre of students and freedom protesters -- Justin Trudeau's government regime has unleashed war horses to trample the elderly on the streets of Ottawa. The following video, now going viral across the 'net, shows mounted Canadian police deliberately driving their massive "war horses" directly into a crowd of peaceful protester, causing the inevitable trampling of innocent human beings. At least one woman caught in the police assault is an elderly woman, and there are conflicting reports on whether she survived being trampled by police. Brighteon.com/900f1108-497e-4801-a416-440c0dc89d1aBy invoking emergency powers last week, Justin "Castro" Trudeau made himself dictator of Canada, and he appears to committed to using violence, lawlessness and financial terrorism against the citizens of Canada. Just like the lying corporate media, Trudeau has declared the freedom protesters to be "racists" and "terrorists." This, he believes, justifies trampling them with war horses and seizing their bank accounts and crypto funds.

Police ramming into protesters with horses in Ottawa.

It is interesting how the legacy media is reporting that the protesters are the violent ones when these videos exist. pic.twitter.com/kPUoQTucrn — Marie Oakes (@TheMarieOakes) February 18, 2022

This next video explains that a "peace loving grandmother" was trampled to death by mounted police. There are conflicting reports on the status of this elderly woman, and other reports say she survived the assault, suffering a separated shoulder. Brighteon.com/fd9d0fb0-2ce4-407b-b155-f5c8f6d74862The freedom-loving people of Canada are rapidly waking up to the reality that Justin "Castro" Trudeau is following in the footsteps of Adolf Hitler in declaring a permanent emergency to seize power and nullify civil liberties. As we reported yesterday, Canada's Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland, is the granddaughter of an actual Nazi collaborator and propagandist who operated out of Ukrain during the Nazi massacre events that took place there. From that story, this compilation image is courtesy of The Gateway Pundit, showing Chrystia Freeland meeting with Justin Trudeau and George Soros during a World Economic Forum meeting. (The WEF is the organization that trains modern "Nazis" in fascism and dictatorial control. Trudeau is a graduate of the WEF training as well.) The only question now is how quickly the people of Canada will rise up against this tyranny and demand the arrest and criminal prosecution of all those in the Trudeau regime who carried out these crimes against humanity.Here's my Situation Update podcast from Friday that delves into more details about Trudeau, Freeland, Canada and the WEF Nazis: Brighteon.com/19458f8a-bd7e-4b18-939a-730d6f9527e0Find more podcasts, interviews and videos each day at: https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport

CDC withholding evidence concerning COVID vaccine safety is scientific fraud. Robert W Malone MD, MS Feb 21

The agency has withheld critical data on boosters, hospitalizations…

"Two full years into the pandemic, the agency leading the country’s response to the public health emergency has published only a tiny fraction of the data it has collected, several people familiar with the data said. Much of the withheld information could help state and local health officials better target their efforts to bring the virus under control"…

Two full years into the pandemic, the agency leading the country’s response to the public health emergency has published only a tiny fraction of the data it has collected, several people familiar with the data said…

“The C.D.C. is a political organization as much as it is a public health organization,” said Samuel Scarpino, managing director of pathogen surveillance at the Rockefeller Foundation’s Pandemic Prevention Institute. “The steps that it takes to get something like this released are often well outside of the control of many of the scientists that work at the C.D.C.”

Let me translate that quote for you. Basically, a non-governmental spokesperson for the “official” public health scientific community is throwing Rochelle Walinsky under the bus, and saying that the politicians forced us to commit scientific fraud by withholding key data.

The Global Summit Doctors and other brave medical practitioners who have stood up to the lies and tyranny - who have been harassed, jobs lost, medical licenses lost, smeared and libeled are right. The data are being withheld.

The main stream media owes a whole lot of us scientist and physicians a huge apology. The main stream media has to stop being the mouthpiece for the government. This is not communist China!

The government owes the American people a huge apology. People in the government who have lied to the American people need to be charged and must be held legally accountable. We the people must demand to see ALL of the data from the CDC and the FDA.

Let’s talk data. The CDC is using cumulative data from the beginning of the vaccine roll-out in early 2021 to prop up the lie that these vaccines are effective against Omicron.

The CDC is clearly hiding the data about safety. The (thoroughly biased) NYT piece above writes further on this.

Pfizer’s data supported the safety of the vaccine, but researchers said the effectiveness wasn’t there with two shots.

“It was effective in the younger kids so those six months to two years but in the two to four-year-old age group it didn’t quite meet the levels of antibody response they expected to see,” said Dr. Christina Canody, BayCare Pediatric Service Line Medical Director.

Now instead of just having an EUA meeting about two doses, Pfizer is continuing their trial for three doses and will present that data once they have it.

Precisely what we have been saying.

Why is this important?

The FDA have not revealed what the efficacy of the boosters for children is. They have not released the safety data. They have withheld the safety data on the vaccines for children and adults.

This must stop. We are deep into outright Scientific Fraud territory.

Let’s remember where this started… We have been manipulated from the VERY start of this pandemic. The government has been deciding what has been written, removed, censored by media and the big tech giants. This is propaganda.

I am posting the HISTORIC references from the beginning of 2020 to show that our government has been involved in scientific fraud from the beginning. Do not forget - this goes back to 2020.

1. World Health Organization holds secretive talks with tech giants Google, Facebook and Amazon to tackle the spread of misinformation on coronavirus. February 17, 2020.

Google, Facebook, Amazon and other tech giants spent a day in secretive talks with the World Health Organization to tackle the spread of coronavirus misinformation.

Social media companies including Twitter and Youtube have already been working to remove post about the virus that are proved to be fake.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has offered to work directly with the companies on fact checking in a bid to speed up the process. 

Posts on the virus that needed to be removed have ranged from those calling it a fad disease or created by the government to claims it can be treated with oregano oil.

Companies at the meeting agreed to work with WHO on collaborative tools, better content and a call centre for people to call for advice, CNBC reported.

2. Bloomburg. Amazon, Alphabet among tech firms meeting with White House on coronavirus response. LA Times. March 11, 2020.

White House officials discussed combating online misinformation about the coronavirus and other measures during a teleconference Wednesday with tech companies including Alphabet Inc.’s Google, Facebook Inc. and Twitter Inc.

U.S. Chief Technology Officer Michael Kratsios led the call, which also included representatives from Amazon.com Inc., Apple Inc., Microsoft Corp., IBM Corp. and other companies and tech trade groups.

The discussion focused on information-sharing with the federal government, coordination regarding telehealth and online education and the creation of new tools to help researchers review scholarship, according to a statement from the White House’s Office of Science and Technology Policy.

“Cutting edge technology companies and major online platforms will play a critical role in this all-hands-on-deck effort,” Kratsios said in a statement. He said his office would unveil a database of research on the virus in coming days

3. White House asks Silicon Valley for help to combat coronavirus, track its spread and stop misinformation. Washington Post. March 11, 2020.

The White House on Wednesday sought help from Amazon, Google and other tech giants in the fight against the coronavirus, hoping that Silicon Valley might augment the government’s efforts to track the outbreak, disseminate accurate information...

The requests came during a roughly two-hour-long meeting between top Trump administration aides, leading federal health authorities and representatives from companies including Cisco, Facebook, IBM, Microsoft and Twitter, as Washington sought to leverage the tech industry’s powerful tools to connect workers and analyze data to combat an outbreak that has already infected more than 1,000 in the United States.

Three participants described the phone-and-video conversation on the condition of anonymity because the session was private. Most tech companies in attendance either did not respond or declined to comment.

The evidence above makes it crystal clear that the government has been manipulating data from the start. Now that Omicron is here and the vaccines are clearly not working. That we have data from other countries that there are issues, we much demand transparency and a stop to the manipulation of the American people. Free speech is free speech.

Scientists and physicians must be allowed to discuss data on the Internet. We ALL must be allowed to discuss data. It is time to stop the madness.

How this all ties into the globalists is becoming more and more clear.

The Next Step for the World Economic Forum Brownstone Institute, February 20, 2022

It has been obvious since early 2020 that there has been an organized cult outreach that has permeated the world as a whole. It’s possible that this formed out of a gigantic error, rooted in a sudden ignorance of cell biology and long experience of public health. It is also possible that a seasonal respiratory virus was deployed by some people as an opportunity to seize power for some other purpose. 

Follow the money and influence trails and the latter conclusion is hard to dismiss. 

The clues were there early. Even before the WHO declared a pandemic in March 2020 (at least several months behind the actual fact of a pandemic) and before any lockdowns, there were media blitzes talking about the “New Normal” and talk of the “Great Reset” (which was rebranded as “Build Back Better”). 

Pharmaceutical companies such as Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Moderna, and Astra-Zeneca were actively lobbying governments to buy their vaccines as early as February 2020, supposedly less than a month after the genetic sequence (or partial sequence) was made available by China.

As a person who spent his whole professional career in pharmaceutical and vaccine development, I found the whole concept of going from scratch to a ready-to-use vaccine in a few months simply preposterous. 

Something did not add up.

Read more at Brownstone…

My last thought for the day: The US government appears be complicit in the creation of this virus. Again, the people are being manipulated. The NIH and the Defense Threat Reduction Agency at the US Department of Defense must be held accountable and they must release the data as to what they have funded and what they knew when - about the creation of SARS-CoV-2. It is time for our government to come clean. It is time for an investigation. Congress must lead the way. They can not shirk their responsibility any longer.