Global-Scale COVID-19 Fraud Is Designed to Control People: Former Pfizer VP By Harry Lee and Roman Balmakov

Lockdowns, mask mandates, and vaccine mandates are all measures not for health, but to get people under control and move toward the ultimate goal of digital ID and digital currency, said Dr. Michael Yeadon, former Pfizer vice president and chief scientific officer for allergy and respiratory research.

“In brief, I’m seeing fraud on a global scale, of which the drug companies are just part,” Yeadon told EpochTV’s “Facts Matter” program in a recent interview.

“There is a huge push globally to persuade people that there is a health threat in order to get them to comply with various economy-destroying measures, and then follow them up with these injections. And I believe this is all ultimately to do with control.”

Related CoverageFormer Pfizer VP: ‘Massive Fraud Playing Out on a Global Scale,’ Reckless to Vaccinate the Whole Population

In April, Yeadon published an article titled “The Covid Lies.” The report refuted a dozen mainstream statements about COVID-19, such as lockdowns slowing the spread and reducing the number of cases and deaths; the only way to end the pandemic is universal vaccination; or the new vaccines are safe and effective.

“I knew it was wrong the moment I heard that they were developing a vaccine. We have never even sought to suppress or end a pandemic through running alongside creating a novel vaccine and then intervening with it,” said Yeadon. “Why? Because—this is really important—the elapsed time taken to get an adequate amount of safety data is always longer than the feasible length of any pandemic in history.”

“And if you take less time, it means you do not have an appropriate amount of safety data.”

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Intervention (CDC), vaccines go through three phases of clinical trials to make sure they are safe and effective. “During the development of COVID-19 vaccines, these phases overlapped to speed up the process so the vaccines could be used as quickly as possible to control the pandemic. No trial phases have been skipped,” said CDC.

“The clinical trials showed no serious safety concerns within eight weeks following vaccination. This is an important milestone, as it is unusual for adverse effects caused by vaccines to appear after this amount of time,” added CDC.

Yeadon said that government shouldn’t coerce people to receive the vaccines with only 2-month-long institutional safety data. “What’s the safety profile six months after you’ve taken it? No one can tell you.”

“I’ve been in drug discovery, drug development for 34 years now. Safety is the most important thing, even more important than effectiveness. Why? Because you’re going to give it to lots of people. So if you’re not really, really sure about the safety, you can easily hurt more people than you could possibly save. That would be doubly so when using a new type of technology,” said Yeadon.

Yeadon had worked for Pfizer for 17 years. He left Pfizer in 2011 to co-found biotech company Ziarco, which Novartis acquired in 2017.

“They said, ‘No. We didn’t cut any corners. We did things in parallel,'” said Yeadon. “No, they didn’t do lots of studies, and they’re missing from the regulatory submission. What that means, I’m afraid, is that the regulators are guilty of fraud.”

“[That] they were not required by the regulator to measure the appearance and disappearance in the blood of these gene-based materials is stunning. Why does that matter so much? It means I’ve no idea whether the amounts going around your body or my body after injection is a tiny amount, medium amount, or a lot. No idea. And they did not measure how long the gene-based material worked to produce the spike protein. Did it last an hour? A week? Forever? They didn’t study it. So we don’t know.”

The CDC referred The Epoch Times to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), “the regulatory authority for vaccine trials and safety studies.” The FDA didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Federal health agencies have drawn widespread criticism over their flip-flop on certain COVID-19 measures and their reluctance to release full information about the vaccines. The FDA asked for 55 years to release Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine data. The New York Times reported in February that the CDC had been withholding critical COVID-19 data on boosters, hospitalizations, and other analyses.

It’s a false statement that the COVID-19 vaccines are “safe and effective,” said cardiologist and epidemiologist Dr. Peter McCullough.

“None of the vaccines have had clinical trials done versus placebo with that composite endpoint,” McCullough told The Epoch Times in a recent interview. “What’s happened over time is a false narrative that’s developed from observational data.”

Encoding Spike Protein Violates Vaccine Design Principle

The next thing that worried Yeadon was that the four leading COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers—Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, and AstraZeneca—all chose spike proteins to trigger the immune response. He explained why that violates vaccine designing principles.

Firstly, vaccine developers should choose a part of an organism that is not intrinsically harmful.

“We knew before they chose it that the sticking out spike bit on the outside of these viruses is of a family of superficial proteins that are known to be biologically active, to have neurological effects, to have thromboembolic or blood clot effects, and more,” said Yeadon. “So I knew that as soon as I did a little bit of basic research … there was going to be significant safety problems.”

Secondly, vaccine developers should choose “a part of the organism that is genetically most stable.”

“Well, they pick the bit that apparently mutates most quickly. So I knew that meant that as soon as the standard genetic drift occurred, the vaccines will stop working.”

He said vaccine developers should pick a part of an organism most different from human beings, “so that when you elicit an immune response to that, it won’t overlap and hit you.

“But unfortunately, the spike protein, although not very similar, is least dissimilar from human proteins. There are dozens of human proteins that are slightly similar. And I think that makes autoimmune responses very likely.”

Autoimmune disease happens when the body’s natural defense system can’t differentiate between its own and foreign cells, causing the body to mistakenly attack normal cells. COVID-19 vaccine-induced autoimmunity has been reported.

(Naeblys/Shutterstock)

The CDC said that messenger RNA (mRNA) and viral vector COVID-19 vaccines produce spike proteins in the body to trigger the immune response. But the CDC maintains that COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective.

Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines use mRNA technology. In contrast, Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca use either a human or chimpanzee adenovirus as the viral vector and encode for the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.

Knowing his former broad colleagues are not stupid, Yeadon had a hard time figuring out why they picked “the worst thing you could.”

“I can’t make that benign. I have tried the hardest I try. I can’t make this a well-intentioned mistake.”

“Collusion and malfeasance” are evident that the four leading vaccine manufacturers all chose to encode the same spike protein in their gene-based vaccines, said Yeadon. Many peers and retired people in his industry told Yeadon they won’t pick this suboptimal choice, and the designers may “loop together.”

The Epoch Times has contacted the above four vaccine manufacturers for comment.

Yeadon spoke up early, but his life changed within a week.

On Dec. 1, 2020, before the European Commission issued its first emergency use authorization for a COVID vaccine, Yeadon and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg co-signed a petition to the European Medicine Agency to suspend all COVID-19 vaccines studies, citing safety concerns. Wodarg is a former health committee chair of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe.

“Within a week, mild-mannered Mike Yeadon who’s never said a thing in public about anything in my whole life apart from in my professional sphere, was suddenly tarred and feathered as an anti-vaxxer,” said Yeadon.

“Why am I doing this? It’s not for money. It’s not for fame. It’s because what I’m telling you is true. That’s the only reason. And I’m doing it for my children and grandchildren,” said Yeadon. He added that he not only had lost a “fat six-figure sum” but also had been abused, smeared, censored, and eliminated from his prior social circle.

‘This is All Ultimately to Do With Control’

Yeadon said that pushing for universal vaccination and many other measures to confront the pandemic are “not to do with public health, but control.”

“The only people you might want to protect would be the very elderly people and those who are already chronically unwell,” said Yeadon. “Why would you want to vaccinate the other 90 percent? You’re wasting money. You’re exposing the population to unnecessary risk. And we’ve never done it before.”

There are “three bits of evidence that I don’t think anyone can rebut,” Yeadon said, referring to three groups of people who shouldn’t be pushed to get vaccinated: those who have recovered from the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus, pregnant women, and healthy young children.

Yeadon explained that people who recovered from COVID-19 have better immunity because their bodies dealt with all the virus’s components, not only the spike protein. Pregnant women shouldn’t take the vaccines because the developing fetus is very vulnerable and no long-term reproductive toxicology testing has been done. And young children are at very low risk from the virus.

CDC recommends all eligible people get vaccinated and receive booster shots when the time is due, including those previously infected, pregnant women, and children aged five and above.

On June 9, the Biden administration announced an operational plan for COVID-⁠19 vaccinations for children under five years old, saying FDA and CDC would consider whether to authorize and recommend the first COVID-19 vaccines for this age group the following week.

If the FDA and CDC do authorize and recommend COVID-19 vaccines for this age group, the first vaccinations might start as early as the week of June 20.

On June 15, an FDA advisory panel voted to recommend giving emergency authorization to the Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines for children as young as 6 months of age.

“I think the end game is mandatory digital ID—actual reward for being vaccinated, you get a vaccination pass,” said Yeadon. “And then the other half would be mandatory cashless, digital money, central bank digital currencies. And lo and behold, those two things seem to be happening everywhere, and they’re coalescing.”

In June 2021, the European Commission proposed giving every citizen a set of digital identity credentials. Every member state must offer citizens a digital ID wallet that can be used throughout the EU by September 2023.

Minister of State to the Federal Chancellor and Federal Government Commissioner for Digitisation, Dorothee Baer, shows an ID wallet on the screen of a mobile phone at the reception of the Steigenberger Hotel in Berlin, Germany, on May 17, 2021. (Filip Singer-Pool/Getty Images)

On March 9, President Joe Biden signed an executive order to advance the development of digital assets, saying, “We must support technological advances that promote responsible development and use of digital assets.”

Yeadon warned that whoever owns the database would have complete control over your life forever because you can’t undo it.

“I plead to people, even if you buy what the government’s been telling you, please be aware and resist, object to the digital control grid,” said Yeadon. “Because I don’t see any way of undoing it. Once it’s done … it will not be possible to remove it.”

Telegram Channel

https://t.me/+LtveYCKl-JtlNzkx

Covid Pandemic Truths: NIH Website Filters Out Top Search Results For “Covid What Is the Truth” BY RHODA WILSON

On 12 June, we conducted a search on US National Institutes of Health’s (“NIH”) website for the term “covid what is the truth.” The top three results returned were:

  • COVID UPDATE: What is the truth?1 The COVID-19 pandemic is one of the most manipulated infectious disease events in history. Russell L. Blaylock.

  • Covid-19 pandemic: What is the truth?2 The World Health Organisation changed the criteria for this “pandemic,” dropping the need for a high death rate. Russell L. Blaylock.

  • Covid-19 pandemic: What is the truth?3 The economic, psychological, and institutional damage caused by these unscientific policies is virtually unmeasurable. Russell L. Blaylock. The link on the NIH website is the abstract, only, of the paper listed immediately above.

However, when we conducted the same search on 17 June, five days later, the two papers, one originally listed twice, no longer appeared in the search results.

Left image: NIH search “covid what is the truth”, retrieved 12 June 2022
Right image: NIH search “covid what is the truth”, retrieved 17 June 2022

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

EMAIL ADDRESS

SUBSCRIBE


Follow The Exposé’s Official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here

At the time of writing all three links provided by the initial search, as noted in the list above, still opened the PubMed pages where the papers are published.  Recently a video has been circulating on social media showing that searching for the truth about Covid, NIH’s website lists Blaylock’s articles as the first three items.  We have to wonder whether NIH has seen this video and in response has filtered Blaylock’s papers out of their search function.

References:

  • 1 Blaylock RL. COVID UPDATE: What is the truth? Surg Neurol Int. 2022 Apr 22;13:167. doi: 10.25259/SNI_150_2022. PMID: 35509555; PMCID: PMC9062939.

  • 2 Blaylock RL. Covid-19 pandemic: What is the truth? Surg Neurol Int. 2021 Dec 8;12:591. doi: 10.25259/SNI_1008_2021. PMID: 34992908; PMCID: PMC8720447.

  • 3 Blaylock RL. Covid-19 pandemic: What is the truth? Surg Neurol Int. 2021 Dec 8;12:591. doi: 10.25259/SNI_1008_2021. PMID: 34992908; PMCID: PMC8720447.

Covid Update: What is the truth

The first paper that appeared in NIH’s original search results is ‘Covid Update: What is the truth?’ written by Blaylock as published in PubMed.  The paper was originally published in Surgical Neurological International on 22 April 2022.  We previously republished this article, a section at a time, in a seven-part series titled ‘Covid Truths’:

  1. Unprecedented Attacks on Doctors and Scientific Experts

  2. Tools of Indoctrination

  3. Logic, Reasoning and Scientific Evidence have Disappeared

  4. Dangers of the “Vaccines” Are Increasingly Revealed

  5. Hot Lots” – Deadly Batches of Vaccines

  6. Why Officials Did Not Want Autopsies

  7. The Deadly Lies Continue

The second article listed on the search results is an earlier paper, also written by Blaylock, published on 8 December 2021.  As with ‘Covid Update: What is the truth?’, we will now be publishing Blaylock’s earlier paper ‘Covid-19 pandemic: What is the truth?’ in sections as a series titled ‘Covid Pandemic Truths’.

Covid-19 pandemic: What is the truth?

Abstract

The ongoing “pandemic” involving the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus (SARS-CoV-2) has several characteristics that make it unique in the history of pandemics. This entails not only the draconian measures that some countries and individual states within the United States and initiated and made policy, most of which are without precedent or scientific support, but also the completely unscientific way the infection has been handled.

For the 1st time in medical history, major experts in virology, epidemiology, infectious diseases, and vaccinology have not only been ignored, but are also demonised, marginalised and in some instances, become the victim of legal measures that can only be characterised as totalitarian.

Discussions involving various scientific opinions have been eliminated, top scientists have been frightened into silence by threats to their careers, physicians have lost their licenses, and the concept of early treatment has been virtually eliminated.

Hundreds of thousands of people have died needlessly as a result of, in my opinion and the opinion of others, poorly designed treatment protocols, mostly stemming from the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, which have been rigidly enforced among all hospitals. The economic, psychological, and institutional damage caused by these unscientific policies is virtually unmeasurable. Whole generations of young people will suffer irreparable damage, both physical and psychological, possibly forever.

The truth must be told.

Source

Russell Blaylock, a retired American neurosurgeon, wrote the above in an extensive paper, ‘Covid-19 pandemic: What is the truth?’, published on 8 December 2021 in the Surgical Neurological International journal.  We are republishing sections, more easily digestible portions, of his paper as a series of articles titled ‘Covid Pandemic Truths’. 

This article is the first in our series and covers the section titled ‘Abstract’ in Blaylocks’s paper.

Although we have not included them, Blaylock’s paper is well referenced. 

Read Blaylock’s full paper – Russell L. Blaylock. Covid-19 pandemic: What is the truth?. 08-Dec-2021;12:59. – by following this LINK.

Telegram Channel

https://t.me/+LtveYCKl-JtlNzkx

Where have all the babies gone? BY TARA D. SONENSHINE

The birth of a baby can be a joyous time. A person is welcomed into the world with the promise of making a difference in the lives of others.

But something unsettling is happening in America and most of the industrialized world. Babies are not being born as often as in the past. The fertility gap has important implications from climate change and public health to immigration and labor. Without enough people, who will farm, feed, work, care for and support a resource-constrained planet? Who will pay taxes? Who will care for the sick and the elderly? Who will make goods and who will buy them?

Think about it: U.S. population growth has been in sharp decline for many years, made more dramatic by the COVID-19 pandemic. Last year was the first time since 2014 that America’s population crept up by 1 percent. Urbanization, new labor shifts, income inequality and concerns about climate change have made young Americans skeptical about bringing children into the world. 

With the pandemic came job loss, working from home, disease and death, and the prospect of an uncertain future. That turned out not to be a recipe for family expansion, although new federal data suggest couples may be getting used to the new normal and considering babies again.

Still, the trend lines have been stark: The Brookings Institution estimates that 300,000 babies were not born in America because of pandemic-driven financial insecurity.  

According to Econofact, based at Tufts University, between 1980 and 2007 the U.S. birthrate hovered between 65 and 70 births per 1,000. As of 2020, the U.S. birthrate was 55.8 per 1,000 women — a decrease of almost 20 percent. Also of note is that teen fertility has declined by as much as 75 percent in recent years.

America is not alone in its population sag. Close to half the world’s population currently lives in countries with low fertility. By some estimates, 91 countries have demonstrated fertility levels below 2.1, considered the fertility rate needed to sustain our society. 

Countries such as Spain, Portugal and Thailand could see their populations halved by 2100, according to the scientific journal “The Lancet.” 

Russia is a big country, but its population is declining, and the remaining population will face stiff sanctions and economic penalties from the war in Ukraine. 

Europe has also had declining populations, although the war has scrambled statistics in many countries with millions of refugees on the move. (Poland suddenly has over 2 million new people, including babies.) But the refugee crisis was unplanned and is straining resources, including child care, maternity wards and school systems. 

Asia is seeing enormous population shifts. Take China. For many years the Chinese government imposed a one-child policy, meaning most families were allowed to have only one child. But as its population declined, China faced the prospect of labor shortages, among other problems. In 2016 it implemented a two-child policy. Last August Chinese authorities announced a three-child policy. Estimates are that China is losing approximately 400,000 people a year by not replenishing its population. 

Japan has long struggled with low fertility rates, and its population decline is nearing historic records. South Korea is struggling with population decline. And even India, the world’s second most populous country, has seen its population decline.

The reasons for population decline are as varied as the countries experiencing it. Certainly, the availability of contraception and abortion have driven down the numbers, along with the education of women about reproductive choices. More women joining the workforce has delayed childbearing in many Western countries. (There is also research suggesting declining global human sperm counts, but the numbers and impact are debatable.)

Some countries are going in the opposite direction. According to the Economist, Africa’s population will double by 2050. By then, Nigeria could overtake the United States to become the third most populous country. 

Similarly, in Southeast Asia, Pakistan, a country of 220 million people, has a population growth rate of 2 percent

Latin America has also tended to have positive population growth, but the situation fluctuates with immigration and conditions within the hemisphere.

And in the Middle East, Israel, with a population surge in recent years, is thought to be, potentially, among the most crowded places on Earth.

So, what is the answer? Does the planet have too many people with too few resources, or are we in danger of losing generations of talent and innovation? 

The truth is we don’t know. My worry is that populations are unevenly distributed, geographically, with much of the population declines in wealthy countries. That means poor countries are often saddled with more people than they can handle.

Some of the possible solutions are worrisome. Coercion, like in the Chinese model, violates freedom and human rights. Using immigration policies to address worker shortages is fraught with unpredictability.

Uncontrolled population growth, absent a national or international plan to address poverty and food insecurity, is reckless. 

Another shortage? Here’s what is happening to supply chainsThere’s no social justice without public safety

Ultimately, we need to strike a delicate balance. We must respect individual choice when it comes to giving birth and, at the same time, create policies that help children grow and prosper, with nutrition, education and a sustainable planet to inhabit.  

That’s a big job. But it must be done.

Tara D. Sonenshine is the Edward R. Murrow Professor of Practice in Public Diplomacy at The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University.

Telegram Channel

https://t.me/+LtveYCKl-JtlNzkx

The Men Who Made Klaus Schwab and The World Economic Forum BY RHODA WILSON

As the driving force behind the World Economic Forum (“WEF”), Klaus Schwab has courted heads of state, leading business executives, and the elite of academic and scientific circles into the Davos fold for over 50 years. More recently, he has also courted the ire of many due to his more recent role as the frontman of the Great Reset, a sweeping effort to remake civilisation globally for the express benefit of the elite of the World Economic Forum and their allies.

Like many prominent frontmen for elite-sponsored agendas, the online record of Schwab has been well-sanitised, making it difficult to come across information on his early history as well as information on his family.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

EMAIL ADDRESS

SUBSCRIBE


Follow The Exposé’s Official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here

In an Unlimited Hangout investigation, Johnny Vedmore, an independent journalist from Wales, explored in detail the past that Schwab has worked to hide, revealing the involvement of the Schwab family, not only in the Nazi quest for an atomic bomb but in apartheid South Africa’s illegal nuclear programme.

Especially revealing is the history of Klaus’ father, Eugen Schwab, who led the Nazi-supported German branch of a Swiss engineering company into the war as a prominent military contractor. That company, Escher-Wyss, would use slave labour to produce machinery critical to the Nazi war effort as well as the Nazi’s effort to produce heavy water for its nuclear program.

Years later, at the same company, a young Klaus Schwab served on the board of directors when the decision was made to furnish the racist apartheid regime of South Africa with the necessary equipment to further its quest to become a nuclear power.

Digging even deeper into his activities, it becomes clear that Schwab’s real role has long been to “shape global, regional and industry agendas” of the present to ensure the continuity of larger, much older agendas that came into disrepute after World War II, not just nuclear technology, but also eugenics-influenced population control policies.

Read more: Schwab Family Values, Johnny Vedmore, 20 February 2021

In another article Vedmore investigated the origins of WEF:

My research indicates that the World Economic Forum is not a European creation. In reality, it is instead an operation which emanates from the public policy grandees of the Kennedy, Johnson and Nixonian eras of American politics; all of whom had ties to the Council on Foreign Relations and the associated “Round Table” Movement, with a supporting role played by the Central Intelligence Agency.

There were three extremely powerful and influential men … who would lead Klaus Schwab towards their ultimate goal of complete American Empire-aligned global domination via the creation of social and economic policies.

I will show how [these three men’s] paths [ ] cross and coalesce during the 1960s, how they recruited Klaus Schwab through a CIA-funded program, and how they were the real driving force behind the creation of the World Economic Forum.

Dr. Klaus Schwab or: How the CFR Taught Me to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb, Johnny Vedmore, 10 March 2022

The three men Vedmore identifies as Schwab’s mentors and the driving force behind WEF are:

  • Henry (Heinz) Kissinger. Kissinger made the opening address of WEF’s 1980 conference, telling the elites at Davos: “For the first time in history, foreign policy is truly global.”

  • John (Ken) Galbraitha, a Canadian-American economist, diplomat, public policy maker, and Harvard intellectual.

  • Herman Kahn, who during the hysteria of the earliest years of the Cold War would be given the intellectual, and some may say ethical and moral, space to “think the unthinkable”. Khan would apply game theory – the study of mathematical models of strategic interactions among rational agents – to wargame potential scenarios and outcomes concerning thermonuclear war.

Read more: Dr. Klaus Schwab or: How the CFR Taught Me to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb, Johnny Vedmore, 10 March 2022

Last week Tessa Lena had a conversation with Vedmore who talked about Schwab’s Nazi collaborator father, Schwab’s curious time at Harvard, and the shady alphabet agency origins of WEF.

He began by explaining how in practice technocracy works using the music scene in Wales as an example. Talking about how the grassroots music scene was being systematically destroyed and small bands trying “to get their music out into the world” he said:

“I grew up with music all around me.  All of my friends were, what we call, flogging a dead horse, they were just pushing to become a musician like in the past, like in the 60s and the 70s … [But] everything was changing … Basically, you had to have a marketing team behind you … then you think, ‘okay we’ll go out into the live scene’ and we were really pushing it. 

“So, we did that but the live scene was dead because they put out loads of laws and built apartments in city centres so no one could make music anymore.  And you’re not allowed to have things going on after a certain time.  And there were no clubs like there were in the past.  The whole infrastructure of what we wanted to create … was all being destroyed, systematically, one by one … the past was being purposely destroyed …

“We can progress and go forward but you don’t have to kill the past to progress.  I’ve seen that build up more and more over time.  And that was really the technocracy.  That’s what they do.  They come in, they introduce their technology and you ‘have to have it whether you want it or not!’  You don’t get a choice.  You don’t get to think about what you want to do.  And you don’t get to decide whether you go to a club to watch people live or, eventually, you go to watch a hologram on a stage … and you have to pay to watch a hologram on a stage of someone performing in their studio.”

For the first 30-minutes, from which the above quotes are taken, Vedmore explained the events in his life that led him to become a researcher and writer and, more specifically, write his article ‘Schwab Family Values’.   He then moved on to discussing Klaus Schwab’s family history.  Some of what he discussed is included in his two articles referred to above. If you are short of time, you could skip the first 30 minutes of the video and start watching from this point.

Click on the image below to watch the video on Rumble.

Tessa Fights Robots: Johnny Vedmore, 9 June 2022 (77 mins)

Further reading: Klaus Schwab and the Origins of WEF: A Conversation with Johnny Vedmore, Tessa Fights Robots, 12 June 2022

Telegram Channel

https://t.me/+LtveYCKl-JtlNzkx

Monkeypox? – U.S. Gov. Data proves Covid-19 Vaccines increase risk of suffering Shingles by at least 4925%

Monkeypox; or the new name the W.H.O are urgently trying to find for it to make it sound more frightening, is about to become the word of the day in the mainstream media now that they know everyone is bored of hearing about Ukraine.

The World Health Organization is convening an emergency meeting and will most likely have announced a Public Health Emergency of International Concern over the alleged disease by the end of June.

All member states including the USA, UK, Canada, Europe, Australia etc. will be legally obliged to then act and respond.

But data made available by the U.S. Government strongly suggests the alleged “monkeypox” outbreak may not be what it appears to be. The disease is nigh on impossible to distinguish from chickenpox/shingles, and the U.S. Gov. data reveals that Covid-19 vaccination increases the risk of developing shingles by a shocking 4925% at the very least.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

EMAIL ADDRESS

SUBSCRIBE


Follow The Exposé’s Official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here

According to a scientific study published in 1988, it’s virtually impossible to distinguish between monkeypox and chickenpox. And chickenpox is caused by the varicella-zoster virus, and just like its close relative the herpes simplex virus, it becomes a lifelong resident in the body.

And like its other cousin, genital herpes, varicella may be silent for many years, hiding out inside nerve cells and can reactivate later, wreaking havoc in the form of the excruciating skin disorder, shingles, which is a blistering, burning skin rash.

Source

Now, data made available by the U.S. Government, but more specifically the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) strongly suggests we’re not witnessing a monkeypox outbreak at all, but we’re instead witnessing a coverup of Covid-19 vaccine-induced shingles.

According to the CDC Wonder Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database, as of June 3rd 2022, the CDC has processed 18,026 reports relating to herpes and shingle infections that have occurred as adverse reactions to the Covid-19 injections.

And the vast majority of these reports have been a result of the mRNA Covid-19 injections by Moderna and Pfizer. The Janssen viral vector vaccine has had just 693 reports of herpes/shingles infections made against it. Whilst the Moderna vaccine has had 5,321, and the Pfizer jab a shocking 12,507.

Meanwhile, according to the same VAERS database, the CDC only received 1,052 reports relating to herpes/shingle infections that have occurred as adverse reactions to all available Flu jabs between the years 2008 and 2020.

This figure alone shows there has been a 1,614% increase in adverse events related to herpes/shingles because of the Covid-19 injections.

Many would try to argue this increase is simply because so many Covid-19 injections have been administered. But anyone who argues this would be entirely wrong because official CDC data shows nearly 3 times as many Flu jabs were administered between 2008 and 2020 than Covid-19 injections administered as of June 3rd 2022.

According to the CDC, 1.7 billion Flu jabs were administered between 2008 and 2020.

But according to ‘Our World in Data’, only 588.04 million Covid-19 jabs have been administered in the USA as of May 27th 2022.

Now that we know these figures we can use them to calculate the rate of adverse events related to herpes/shingles infections per 1 million doses administered.

The results are as follows –

Based on official data available for 2008 to 2020, there were 0.6 adverse events relating to herpes/shingles infections per 1 million doses of Flu vaccine administered in the USA.

But based on official data available up to 3rd June 2022, there have been 30.7 adverse events relating to herpes/shingles infections per 1 million doses of Covid-19 vaccine administered in the USA.

However, it’s important to note that the CDC have admitted they believe just 1 to 10% of adverse events are actually reported to VAERS, therefore the rates per 1 million doses could be significantly higher for both jabs.

But the available data shows the rate of adverse events relating to herpes/shingles infections per 1 million doses of Covid-19 injection administered is 4,925% higher than the rate of adverse events relating to herpes/shingles infections per 1 million doses of Flu vaccine administered.

Therefore, this official U.S. Government data proves that Covid-19 vaccination increases a person’s risk of developing Shingles by 4,925% at the very least.

The Emergency Committee of the World Health Organization is set to meet on Thursday 23rd June 2022, to assess whether the alleged monkeypox outbreak represents a public health emergency of international concern.

But it looks like they may actually be meeting to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern by the end of June 2022 over Covid-19 vaccine-induced shingles.

Telegram Channel

https://t.me/+LtveYCKl-JtlNzkx

Man Who Allegedly Tried to Kill Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh Indicted, Faces Life in Prison

The California man who authorities say admitted to flying across the country to try to kill Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh is facing life in prison if convicted after a grand jury returned an indictment on June 15.

Nicholas John Roske, 26, of Simi Valley, was indicted on one count of “Attempt to Assassinate Justice of United States,” according to a court filing.

The punishment for the count, a violation of 18 U.S.C Section 351(c), is a maximum of life in prison.

Roske was initially charged with attempting to murder a U.S. judge. If convicted of that charge, a judge could have sentenced him to no more than 20 years in jail.

Roske flew to an airport in the Washington area and took a taxi to Chevy Chase, Maryland, on June 8, according to court documents. He was dropped off outside Kavanaugh’s home at approximately 1 a.m.

After spotting two U.S. deputy marshals standing on the property, Roske turned and walked down the street. After texting with his sister, he called 911 on himself, reporting that he had weapons and was going to try to hurt Kavanaugh.

Montgomery County police officers rushed to the scene and took Roske into custody without incident.

Roske admitted in two separate interviews with law enforcement that he went to Kavanaugh’s home with the intention of breaking into the residence and killing the justice. He also said he planned to kill himself afterward.

Roske stated that he was motivated by fears that Kavanaugh, a Trump appointee, would rule against Roe v. Wade in the upcoming decision in a case brought by the state of Mississippi, and against gun control laws, referring to a separate decision due before the nation’s top court finishes its current term.

Charging documents listed what items Roske had with him, but the indictment identified additional items and detailed those previously listed.

The document gives the serial number for the Glock 17 gun Roske possessed while revealing that in addition to having two magazines with approximately 10 rounds each of 9mm ammunition, there were approximately 17 additional rounds of ammunition in a plastic bag. It also lists Roske as having, among other items, a Streamlight TLR4 light and laser; a ComfortTac belly band holster, used to carry a gun for easy access; an ASP-Micro TM160 monocular that’s capable of thermal imaging; a black face mask; and a lock picking kit.

Roske initially appeared in federal court in Greenbelt on the day he was arrested. He and his lawyer decided not to ask a judge for release pending trial.

The next appearance hasn’t been scheduled yet, U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland Erek Barron said after the grand jury indictment was issued.

Barron praised the FBI, the Montgomery County Police Department, the U.S. Marshals Service, and the U.S. Supreme Court Police for their work on the investigation.

Also on June 15, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and other senators urged Attorney General Merrick Garland to start prosecuting people for protesting outside the homes of Kavanaugh and other justices who are expected to strike down Roe v. Wade, according to a leaked draft opinion.

“Somehow, the situation is only escalating. Not only did the illegal picketing resume mere hours after the assassination attempt on Justice Kavanaugh, but reports are that those seeking to intimidate the Justices at their homes plan to expand their campaign of harassment to their children’s schools. Enough,” the senators wrote (pdf) to Garland, a Biden appointee.

Garland, speaking with reporters in Buffalo, New York, didn’t directly address the increasing pressure from Republicans to prosecute protesters for violating a federal law that prohibits protesting outside the homes of judges with the intent of influencing them.

Garland said the Department of Justice (DOJ) “takes extraordinarily seriously any violence—any criminal threats of violence, intimation, harassment of the justices or of any government officials” and noted that he ordered around-the-clock protection for the homes of all nine justices before Roske’s alleged attempt on Kavanaugh’s life.

The DOJ has declined to comment when asked why federal officials aren’t enforcing the law.

Garland told lawmakers in a recent missive that he couldn’t confirm or deny whether the agency is probing possible violations of the law in question, invoking DOJ policies on avoiding talking about ongoing investigations.

“Is White House policy keeping you from bringing charges? If not, tell us. Or tell our staff. You can respond by letter or you can schedule a phone call or even a briefing,” the senators said in response. “If there is a good reason why you aren’t charging these obvious crimes, explain it to us. We want to understand. The situation is too dire and too important for more meaningless boilerplate about Justice Department policies.”

Telegram Channel

https://t.me/+LtveYCKl-JtlNzkx

Mass CATTLE deaths send shockwaves through food supply as speculation rises: Are they being poisoned on purpose? Thursday, June 16, 2022 by: Mike Adams

(Natural News) Following over 100 fires that appear to be acts of sabotage against food facilities across the United States, speculation is now running rampant about thousands of cattle that appear to have died suddenly in Kansas over the weekend. According to the corporate media which also claims all covid vaccines are “safe and effective,” these sudden mass deaths are the result of heat. Yet cows are incredibly resilient and frequently endure the same temperatures that the Midwest is experiencing right now. Why are thousands of cattle apparently dying so suddenly?

AgDaily.com, like the rest of the conventional media, says the deaths were caused by a combination of heat, humidity and lack of wind. CNBC is also reporting that the The Kansas Department of Health and Environment agrees with this assessment.

Yet I am personally near hundreds of head of cattle in central Texas where temperatures are the same (and the days are even longer this time of year due to the more southern latitude). I see Longhorn cattle, Angus, Blanco and other breeds abound in Central Texas, yet I don’t see thousands of cattle dropping dead anywhere.

Digging into this issue further, I called one of my friends who owns several hundred head of cattle. He was already aware of the Kansas “mass death” event and had been discussing it with other cattle owners. I asked him if he believed the media story that all these cattle suddenly died from heat exposure. His answer?

“I doubt it very seriously that so many would drop dead all at the same time,” he told me. “In a heat-related incident, they wouldn’t all drop dead at the same time. You would see a few dead at a time, scattered across the herd, but not so many deaths all at once.”

When I asked him if he thinks these are natural deaths or something more like sabotage, he said, “I’m thinking it’s something nefarious.”

Bovine epidemics can also cause large-scale simultaneous death, but no one is claiming these are bovine epidemic deaths. So that leaves only a couple of possibilities in the realm of sabotage: 1) Poisoning of the water, 2) Directed Energy Weapons (DEW).

This is on top of over 100 documented cases of arson sabotage of food facilities across the USA. Our research staff has put together the full details on each of these (date, location, facility name, description of the fire incident) and we will be publishing this new, updated list soon.

The deliberate take down of the economy and the food supply

What many Americans are waking up to now is the reality that our own government is at war with We the People. They are deliberately destroying the energy infrastructure and obliterating the economy. They are crashing asset markets and utterly destroying the future viability of pensions. And now, it’s clear they’re taking down the food supply chain on purpose, thrusting the American people into food scarcity, food inflation and real famine.

It seems as if the illegitimate Biden regime — which was never actually elected into power — wants to create nationwide riots before the mid-term elections so they can justify a declaration of martial law or some other national emergency. They need something big to break so they can try to cancel the elections or force nationwide mail-in voting so they can steal the election results yet again (like they did in 2020).

With each passing day, they tear down something else that keeps the economy running: Pipelines, international trade, railroads, infant formula manufacturing, etc. Week after week, the food collapse intensifies while food prices skyrocket. The end result is abundantly obvious: Widespread food scarcity combined with sky-high prices that few will be able to afford.

And then on top of that, the question now emerges: Are they deliberately running out and mass murdering cattle, too? We know the Biden regime is run by insane, criminal lunatics who despise beef and ranching operations, but are they really willing to go that far to create a food crisis and try to suspend the elections?

Of course they’re that crazy. They’re Democrats, the party that celebrates murdering their own children after they’re born. Mass murdering cows is nothing to them. In fact, a recent poll shows that nearly half of young male democrats believe that assassinating a politician is completely okay. This poll, astonishingly, was carried out by the left-wing SPLC. As the Daily Caller reports:

Forty-four percent of the “younger Democratic men” surveyed in the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) poll approved of “assassinating a politician who is harming the country or our democracy.” That was the highest rate of any gender, party and age combination.

Remember, these same left-wing fascists believe that carbon dioxide is killing the planet. Thus, they have no problem justifying mass murder of animals or humans as long as they believe it “saves the planet.”

California, run by these same death cult Democrats, has just approved an actual infanticide bill that legalizes the murder of a perfectly healthy child up to 7 days after birth, reports Charisma News.

So yes, these same people who gladly murder their own children and who justify murdering political opponents would not hesitate for a second to mass murder cattle if it meant creating a food crisis that leads to the chaos they want.

Nobody is surprised anymore at the evil of the Democrats.

They will do absolutely anything to try to stay in power, which is exactly why we must work overtime to remove them from power.

Get more details on all this — plus new analysis on the financial collapse that’s under way — in today’s Situation Update podcast:

Brighteon.com/6cba8d45-bca2-4dfd-adf2-29093b5d422f

Telegram Channel

https://t.me/+LtveYCKl-JtlNzkx