Florida Surgeon General Openly Questioning Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines

While organized medicine completely disagrees, Florida’s Surgeon General, Joseph Ladapo, at the end of last week went on the record with very strong language concerning COVID-19 vaccine safety, or the lack thereof. In a recent press release sharing the news about a deal with the Special Olympics to lift the vaccine mandate, Dr. Ladapo actually committed professional heresy in today’s professional environment, raising doubts about the COVID-19 vaccine safety profile and suggesting they may not be safe to use.  

Jacob Ogles, writing for Florida Politics, reported on the matter, noting that the Surgeon General made such claims with “anecdotal evidence” at best when he suggested that the COVID-19 vaccines generate more side effects than other vaccines.  

Dr. Ladapo declared, “People will say oh, you know, millions of people have taken these vaccines, they must be safe.”  He continued, “Well, you can’t know the answer to that when it is taboo to talk about having a reaction to vaccines.”

On the flu vaccine, Ladapo emphasized: “There’s another vaccine that over 100 million Americans take every year, and it’s the influenza vaccine,” he said. “And the stream of adverse events that I’ve heard from people all over this country after these vaccines is nothing like the years of my life when I’ve been in medicine and have been administering the influenza vaccines. There is a difference, and you can’t say that millions of people getting it excuses you from that.”

Do Mandates Make Sense?

Declaring mandates don’t make sense for a vaccine that doesn’t stop viral transmission, Ladapo now is in the same camp, believe it or not, as Bill Gates, who also recently at Davos pointed out there really isn’t much point to checking in on people and making sure they have been vaccinated when this won’t stop transmission. TrialSite reported on Gates’ comments here.

“Scientifically, it makes zero sense,” Ladapo said. “How can you force people to take a vaccine in order to stop transmission when that vaccine is not effective at stopping transmission.”

Benefits

But the benefits associated with the vaccine do come with some risks. Data collected from public health authorities around the world indicate vaccines have reduced serious illness and death counts, for example. Although there are some countries where TrialSite reports an uptick, or even record deaths from COVID-19 in heavily vaccinated populations (e.g. Australia), health agencies such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) acknowledge that the vaccines don’t completely stop transmission but still offer benefits.

Ogles points to a statement from the CDC, stating, “Data show fully vaccinated persons are less likely than unvaccinated persons to acquire SARS-CoV-2, and infections with the delta variant in fully vaccinated persons are associated with less severe clinical outcomes .”

And the viral transmission may not be as bad as one study from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, revealing that those persons that were fully vaccinated were 63% to 73% less likely to spread the pathogen.

Yet TrialSite tracks nation after nation with a near-universally fully vaccinated adult population that faces record infectious surges and, in the case of Australia, for example, record deaths. Although adults are over 90% vaccinated Down Under, more than double the number of persons died in the first three months of 2022 than all of 2020 and 2021. Nearly all of these deaths involved vaccinated people. TrialSite is the only media consistently reporting on this sort of bad news. Could Ladapo be correct that it’s taboo to discuss any problems with the COVID-19 vaccines?  That’s a real problem, if so; science depends on open debate, even argument. 

TrialSite recently discussed the topic of herd immunity—remember that topic? The vaccines were to help societies attain that vital status to transcend the pathogen. Yet many critics, including this media, questioned the eradication of the pathogen with a mass vaccination paradigm from near the start. It didn’t make sense given the highly transmissible nature of the pathogen. The fact that it has already evolved elaborately indicated it would evolve further, making it more difficult for mass vaccination in one mass surge.

TrialSite tracks medical research and associated trends around the world and now picks up on growing concern about COVID-19 vaccine safety. It’s becoming a topic that is less taboo each month that passes.

https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/florida-surgeon-general-opening-questioning-safety-of-covid-19-vaccines-b9af0ce3

Japanese Cardiovascular Surgeon: Stop the Vaccine Boosters Now Due to Serious Risks

First, the cardiovascular surgeon reminds all of the waning nature of vaccine effectiveness. By month number eight, after the administration of two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine, immunity “was lower than that among the unvaccinated individuals.” The European Medicines Agency (EMA) suggests avoiding frequent booster shots given that they could “adversely affect immune response and may not be feasible.” Kenji Yamamoto wrote a comment piece in the Virology Journal, an open access, peer-reviewed journal. He is a surgeon at Okamura Memorial Hospital’s Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Center of Varicose Veins in Shizouka, on the central Honshu Pacific Coast and near Mt. Fuji. In a letter to the editor, Dr. Yamamoto declares, “As a safety measure, further booster vaccinations should be discontinued plus several other measures taken for vulnerable patients.” The respected cardiovascular surgeon acknowledges that the media is censoring COVID-19 vaccine injuries, including deaths.

TrialSite provides a breakdown of Dr. Yamamoto’s piece for more popular understanding.

Why the decrease in immunity?

Could it be due to “N1-methylpseudouridine, the spike protein, lipid nanoparticles, antibody-dependent enhancement, and the original antigenic stimulus?”

What are some safety concerns observed in Japan?

Dr. Yamamoto reports problems with the presentation of shingles in association with COVID-19, sometimes called “vaccine-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.” The cardiovascular surgeon reports that since the end of 2021, the teams at Okamura Memorial Hospital have encountered not only numerous cases of COVID-19 but also shingles infections that are “difficult to control.” He shared that in some more extreme cases due to vaccination, serious inflammation occurred after open-heart surgery, for example, and some deaths were even recorded.

Given the risks of infection, Dr. Yamamoto has observed, “Various medical algorithms for evaluating postoperative prognosis may have to be revised in the future.”

Bombshell Japan

Moreover, the respected surgeon shared what many know to be reality, “The media have so far concealed the adverse events of vaccine administration, such as vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VTT), owing to biased propaganda.” While the cause is often recognized—often in waves explains the surgeon, they aren’t responding in part due to the bias.

He notes, “Four HIT antibody-positive cases confirmed at the institute since the start of vaccination” have been “fatal cases due to VTT” secondary to the jab.

What safety measures should be taken?

For the at-risk and vulnerable patients coming through the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, the Japanese physician shares, “As a safety measure, booster vaccination should be discontinued.”

In addition to documenting vaccination dates in the electronic health record, the doctor suggests “several practice measures to prevent a decrease in immunity,” including:

  • Limiting the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (including acetaminophen) to maintain deep body temperature

  • Appropriate use of antibiotics

  • Smoking cessation

  • Stress control

  • Limiting the use of lipid emulsions, including propofol which could trigger perioperative immunosuppression.

At least, when it comes to critically ill patients, the COVID-19 vaccines are “a major risk factor,” which runs contrary to organized medicine’s marching orders in the United States.

Lead Research/Investigator

Kenji Yamamoto, Cardiovascular surgeon at Okamura Memorial Hospital’s Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Center of Varicose Veins

SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Subvariants Rages in Near Universally Vaccinated Portugal

Yet again, one of the world’s most vaccinated nations grapples with another near-record surge of SARS-CoV-2 infections, breakthrough hospitalizations, and deaths. This time, TrialSite visits Portugal, a Southern European nation of 10.3 million people with a fully vaccinated rate of approximately 86%. Adults are nearly universally vaccinated. The nation has maintained a rate of 80% or higher for fully vaccinated people since October 2021. By January 2022, according to Newsweek, Prime Minister Antonio Costa declared that the fully vaccinated rate by then was actually 89%, and 3 million Portuguese, or about 29% of the population, had already been boosted. But what is now occurring on Europe’s southwestern tip had been seen in May of this year in other places such as Gibraltar, Iceland, Australia, and New Zealand. Intense clusters of infection, hospitalization and even death among the vaccinated establishing that this pandemic is very much a pandemic for everyone.

Omicron Subvariant Wave

According to recent press from Reuters that acknowledged the problem, 90% of the new infections are driven by a Omicron subvariant known as BA.5, according to Ricardo Jorge with the Public Health Institute. BA.4 is also in circulation there, and both BA.5 and BA.4 originated from South Africa.

According to Health Minister Mata Temido in an interview with an RTP broadcaster, “Portugal is probably the European country with the highest prevalence of this sub-lineage, and this partly explains the high number (of cases) we are seeing.”

The Portugal News reported that between May 24 and May 30, the nation “recorded 175,766 infections, 220 deaths associated with COVID-19, and an increase in hospitalizations and intensive care.”

The Numbers

Portugal’s record-breaking surges due to Omicron started at the beginning of 2022, a time when the overwhelming percentage of the population should have been protected, however, the vaccines don’t stop viral transmission after several weeks (although they may reduce the velocity of infection).

See first graph by quarter new cases below.

New COVID-19 Cases in Portugal:

Note, the record number of cases occurred January 30th: the nation’s adult population already was near-universally vaccinated.

Vaccination Rates & New Cases:

As visualized above, the vaccination rates in the country are superimposed over new SARS-CoV-2 infections. Clearly, the surge of new cases by January 2022 is unprecedented, right at the time when the population was near-universally vaccinated.

Hospitalization and ICU with Vaccination Rate:

While the COVID-19 vaccines have helped reduce hospitalization and ICU entry, unfortunately, these are now on the rise again due to the sheer magnitude of community transmission associated with Omicron. There are so many infections that more hospitalization admission is now occurring, particularly with the elderly and vulnerable.

COVID-19 Deaths

In Portugal, the deadliest part of the pandemic was early February, right before the vaccination program commenced. The vaccination program has markedly reduced the threat of death, as TrialSite has reported in some nations (but not in all nations such as Australia, New Zealand, and South Korea, for example). However, much like hospitalization and ICU entry, deaths, unfortunately, are on the rise in vulnerable populations that are fully vaccinated. By January, nearly 30% of the population was boosted. TrialSite will monitor the situation carefully.

Portugal COVID-19 Deaths

https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/sars-cov-2-omicron-subvariants-rages-in-near-universally-vaccinated-portugal-8cb42a8a

We must never Forgive or Forget the War against the Unvaccinated

Fomenting hatred is a tool of tyrants, and over the past two years, political leaders, agency heads, academics, medical professionals and media personalities alike have publicly encouraged hatred and violence and wished painful death upon anyone who didn’t want to be part of the medical experiment that is the COVID jabs.

This is something we must never forget.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

EMAIL ADDRESS

SUBSCRIBE


Follow The Exposé’s official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here

By Dr J Mercola

In an eloquent Medium post, journalist Susan Dunham summarizes the lessons (hopefully) learned from hating and attacking the unvaccinated:1

“The mandates have let up, and both sides stumble back into something that looks like the old normal — except that there is a fresh and present injury done to the people we tried to break. And no one wants to talk about it.

Only weeks ago, it was the admitted goal of our own leaders to make life unlivable for the unvaccinated. And as a deputized collective, we force-multiplied that pain, taking the fight into our families, friendships, and workplaces. Today, we face the hard truth that none of it was justified — and, in doing that, uncover a precious lesson.

It was a quick slide from righteousness to cruelty, and however much we might blame our leaders for the push, we’re accountable for stepping into the trap despite better judgement.

We knew that waning immunity put vast numbers of the fully vaccinated on par with the shrinking minority of unvaccinated, yet we marked them for special persecution. We said they hadn’t ‘done the right thing’ by turning their bodies over to state care — even though we knew that principled opposition to such a thing is priceless in any circumstance …

And so it was by the willful ignorance of science, civics, and politics that we squeezed the unvaccinated to the degree that we did … [W]e cannot hold our heads high, as if believing we had logic, love, or truth on our side while we viciously wished death upon the unvaccinated. The best we can do is sit in the awareness of our rabid inhumanity for having cast so many aside …

[B]etting against them has been a scathing embarrassment for many of us who’ve now learned that the mandates only had the power we gave them. It was not through quiet compliance that we avoided endless domination by pharmaceutical companies and medical checkpoints at every doorway.

It was thanks to the people we tried to tear down … We took the bait by hating them, but their perseverance bought us the time to see we were wrong. It seems right now like the mandates will return, but this time there’s hope that more of us will see them for what they are: a rising authoritarianism that has no concern for our wellbeing.”

Forgive and Forget?

Dunham addresses the situation from the point of those who fell for the hypnotic command to despise anyone — friends and family included — who refused to buy the official narrative about the COVID shots. Most of you, however, have likely been on the receiving end of those attacks.

How are you choosing to address it? What have you learned? I suspect many of you are indeed willing to forgive, but few will ever forget those betrayals. But as noted by Dunham, no one really wants to talk about what was done.

Everyone’s just going along as if it never happened. As if our leaders didn’t actually call for our deaths. As if our president didn’t warn us his patience with us was “wearing thin”2 — a threat that implied bad things would happen once patience ran dry. As if news anchors like Don Lemon didn’t actually say we deserved to starve and shouldn’t be allowed to enter a grocery store.3,4 But they did say those things, and family and friends did reject us as a result.

Ignorance Still Remains

Remarkably, even now, with everything we know for sure about the jabs, the war against the unvaccinated continues in many areas, and while compassion is slowly making a comeback, ignorance of the basics still abounds. As noted in a January 21, 2022, MSN article:5

“There seems to be a war on the unvaccinated individuals because of the recent spike in COVID-19 cases due to the more transmissible Omicron variant … Starting last year, the Austrian government imposed restrictions solely on the country’s unvaccinated population, as many people wondered why those who got vaccinated should also face the same restrictions as those who opted against it …

I am all for encouraging people to get vaccinated; I had my jabs and my booster immediately when they became available in my community … But I wonder: Just how necessary is this war on the unvaccinated?

What if a person decided to opt-out against the vaccine because they had preexisting medical conditions, simply feared for their life, or lacked the knowledge about it because the government was too busy forcing and scaring people instead of genuinely informing them?”

Sadly, the author of that MSN piece seems convinced that if only the reluctant were to be given the science, the data, they would understand why the shots are so necessary, when the reality is that the science and the data have been the basis for our refusal from the start. Until or unless the experimental jab pushers acknowledge reality, we will never be able to see eye to eye.

The MSN author also believes that lack of financial incentive is behind some of the vaccine hesitancy:6

“If a person is given the choice between going to work or to the vaccination center, they would simply choose the option where there is money. That is just the reality. If they can go to the vaccination center and can still be promised to get their day’s pay, why wouldn’t they want to get vaccinated, right?”

This naiveté ignores the reality that countless individuals have sacrificed their careers by refusing the jab. For most of us, it was never about a lack of financial incentives. It was about the very real dangers the jabs pose — dangers that “the powers that be” have yet to fully acknowledge.

First, They Came for the Unvaxxed. They’ll Come for You Next

From the start, I and many others warned that the demonization of the unvaccinated was an extremely dangerous war tactic. In an August 2021 Townhall article, Wayne Allyn Root wrote:7

“It’s time for alarm bells. It’s time for me to play the part of Paul Revere: ‘The communist tyrants and dictators are coming!’ … They’re coming first for unvaccinated Americans. This is 1938. I’m a Jew. I now understand just a little of what it felt like to be a Jew in 1938 … the pre-Holocaust … This is only the beginning. It gets much worse from here.

First, ‘the papers.’ Vaccine mandates and vaccine passports are just like 1938, when the Gestapo demanded papers from every German. Republicans asked for ‘papers’ from migrants who had broken into our country … Republicans asked for ‘papers’ once every two years for federal elections, to prove you have a right to vote.

Democrats said, ‘No, that’s racism.’ Now Democrats want American citizens, not illegal aliens, not criminals, but patriots born in this country, to produce papers 24/7 …

Weren’t Jews injected with experimental drugs by the depraved Nazi government? Wasn’t that a key part of the Nuremberg trials? That no government could ever again inject experimental shots into the bodies of unwilling citizens? Isn’t that a basic human right? … [F]orcibly injecting Americans who don’t want it. That’s 1938.”

Root goes on to detail the fate of Jews during those pre-Holocaust years. They were locked in their homes. They were barred from work. Their businesses were deemed “nonessential.” They couldn’t travel. They had to wear a conspicuous yellow star on their clothing so they could be easily identified and targeted for public displays of hatred. Jewish books were burned — that was the 1938 version of online censorship and deplatforming.

“First, they came for the unvaccinated. Trust me: Next, they’re coming for you,” Root said. And, indeed, in recent weeks, we’ve seen the stage being set for another fabricated hate-fest. This time, the gay community is the designated enemy and target.

Same-sex relations has been identified as the primary source of a global monkeypox outbreak. Almost every article discussing the outbreaks mentions it. That’s how it begins. I’ll be very surprised if the gay community won’t be targeted for exclusion, derision and attack in coming weeks and months.

Will enough people have learned the lesson of humility that Dunham highlights? Have enough cognitively recognized the error of their ways, or will they fall into the trap yet again? Only time will tell. At the end of February 2021, Nick Cohen with The Guardian warned that “It is only a matter of time before we turn on the unvaccinated.”8

With COVID, it took barely two months for society to go from ‘we’re all in this together,’ to declaring half the population subhuman.

By the end of April 2021, USA Today columnist Michael J. Stern was calling for the public shunning of the vaccine hesitant, calling them “petri dishes” of lethal disease,9 and by July of that year, CNN anchor Don Lemon was calling for brutal anything-goes restrictions against the unvaccinated to force them into compliance10 — even if the restrictions were indistinguishable from a death sentence.

With COVID, it took barely two months for society to go from “we’re all in this together,” to declaring half the population subhuman. Let’s see how long it takes before the media start calling for the forced segregation of gays to protect us from monkeypox. I hope it doesn’t happen, but judging by the effectiveness of the brainwashing, causing people buying into clearly absurd narratives, the risk is certainly there.

Teachable Moments

As recently as mid-January 2022, LA Times columnist Michael Hiltzik “doubled down on the notion, people should mock the unvaccinated who have died from the coronavirus,” Fox News reported.11 Hiltzik told CNN:

“So many of them have actually promoted reckless, dangerous policies and… they took innocent people along with them. Every one of these deaths is a teachable moment and, unfortunately, we haven’t been learning from the lesson that we should be hearing from them.”

Clearly, Hiltzik has not yet experienced the moment of clarity described by Dunham. Instead, he insists that “Mocking anti-vaxxers is ghoulish … but necessary.” His LA Times column12 bearing the same headline displays a picture of a smiling Kelly Ernby, wearing a cross around her neck. Ernby, an Orange County GOP member, died of COVID complications in January 2022 after opposing COVID jab mandates.

“How should we react to the deaths of the unvaccinated?” Hiltzik wrote.13 “On the one hand, a hallmark of civilized thought is the sense that every life is precious.

On the other, those who have deliberately flouted sober medical advice by refusing a vaccine known to reduce the risk of serious disease from the virus, including the risk to others, and end up in the hospital or the grave can be viewed as receiving their just deserts.”

His targeting of Ernby, a Republican, and clearly a Christian to boot, smacks of political vengeance as much as it does misplaced moral superiority. According to Hiltzik, being civil toward the unvaccinated who die erases the harm done to others, and that harm should not be erased but rather underscored.

Ironically, in the end, he’s really condemning himself to the fate he wishes on others because, eventually, the truth will become common knowledge and everyone will recognize the fatal harm inflicted by pushing the use of this experimental gene transfer technology. Mockery probably won’t be the extent to the punishment dished out once that critical mass awakening happens.

In Some, the Hypnotic Trance Is Still Deep

Some, like Dunham, recognize the fallacy in their thinking and call for change. Others, like Hiltzik, have been so deeply brainwashed by the fearporn, they really cannot connect the dots and see that a “vaccine” that doesn’t prevent infection or spread can never protect others.

Hence, those who get the jab are no more considerate to others than those who don’t. Both pose the same risk to others. And, if both pose the same risk, why target one for derision and not the other? It’s beyond irrational, but such is the mind of those under the hypnotic spell of mass formation. They’re incapacitated in the worst of ways, unable to see reality.

Scottish journalist Andrew Neil is another one seemingly caught in the myopic focus of mass formation. In December 2021, he riled against Britain’s “five million vaccine refuseniks,” saying “They put us all at risk of more restrictions.”14

He went on to describe how quick and easy it was to pull out his vaccine passport at a restaurant. Seconds, really. “A very minor inconvenience,” he said, adding “There was a sense of safety in knowing that all the other diners had proved themselves to be fully vaccinated, or had very recently tested negative, or had contracted the virus and recovered.”

He felt safe, having undergone this completely useless ritual, despite recognizing that the shot is “not foolproof,” and that “People who have been vaccinated can still contract and pass on the virus.” That’s the power of hypnosis. Even when seeing the dots, he couldn’t connect them to draw a rational conclusion.

New Norm: Fighting ‘Misinformation’ With Misinformation

The propaganda and false information we’ve been bombarded with over the past two and a half years is truly unprecedented. Now, barely a day goes by that isn’t near-identical to the storyline in Orwell’s dystopian novel, “1984.” One of the latest examples of the media’s hypocrisy and false narratives is The Associated Press’ “Conspiracy Theorists Flock to Bird Flu, Hatch Lies” article,15 published May 17, 2022. The AP specifically targets me, stating:16

“While the details may vary, the conspiracy theories about avian flu all speak to a distrust of authority and institutions, and a suspicion that millions of doctors, scientists, veterinarians, journalists and elected officials around the world can no longer be trusted.

‘Americans clearly understand that the federal government and major media have lied to them repeatedly, and are completely corrupted by the pharmaceutical companies,’ said Dr. Joseph Mercola, an osteopath whose discredited claims about vaccines, masks and the coronavirus made him a prominent source of COVID-19 misinformation.

Mercola’s interest in the bird flu dates back years A 2009 book for sale on his website, which Mercola uses to sell unproven natural health remedies, is titled ‘The Great Bird Flu Hoax.’”

The hyperlinked “fact check” provided to prove I’ve published “discredited claims about vaccines” is a rebuttal to my statement that “People may be more susceptible to serious COVID-19 illness after they have been vaccinated.”

The fact check claims that “Research has shown that the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines have been proven to be 95% effective in preventing COVID-19 illness,” and that “Experts say there is ‘abundant’ evidence that people who get shots will not become more sick should they later get the virus.”

First of all, no expert sources are actually referenced, so what “abundant evidence” proves you won’t be more susceptible to severe infection post-jab is anyone’s guess. Secondly, and more importantly, everyone now knows the shots are nowhere near 95% effective. Even mainstream media and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have admitted the effectiveness was exaggerated and rapidly dwindles.

Truth May Be Slow, but It Will Win

At best, Moderna’s shot was 94.5% effective against symptomatic Delta infection FOR TWO WEEKS, before dropping off.17 Pfizer’s effectiveness against Delta was lower to start and fell more precipitously. Against Omicron, the Pfizer jab is 65.5% protective between weeks 2 and 4 after the second dose, and only 8.8% effective at week 25. Moderna’s shot starts out at 75.1% at weeks 2 to 4, and then falls off to 14.9% at week 25.

Yet the AP has no qualms about referring back to what is now well-recognized misinformation to “prove” that I’ve been discredited and that they are “correct.” In reality, the fact check they link to only proves they’re using misinformation to combat truth.

That’s bad enough, but these fabrications are then used to brainwash the public into hating the truth-tellers and anyone who so much as points out discrepancies in the narrative. It’s a dangerous path, and we’re still on it.

Similarly, when the facts finally overwhelm authorities who have been spreading unscientific propaganda, the canned response is that “science is evolving and we’re following the science.” In reality, however, they were proven wrong, but they refuse to admit it. So, they “blame” it on “evolving science,” without ever explaining how “misinformation spreaders” had these supposedly brand-new data months — or years — ago.

While the war we’re currently in uses information instead of conventional munitions, lives are still at stake. People are losing their lives because lies about health are often lethal. In the end, I believe the truth will win, because the lies currently told are simply too destructive.

https://expose-news.com/2022/06/07/never-forget-the-war-against-the-unvaccinated/

MUST WATCH: Global COVID Summit - Declaration IV - Restore Scientific Integrity

Global COVID Summit - Declaration IV - Restore Scientific Integrity

https://globalcovidsummit.org/news/declaration-iv-restore-scientific-integrity

17,000 physicians and medical scientists declare that the state of medical emergency must be lifted, scientific integrity restored, and crimes against humanity addressed.

We, the physicians and medical scientists of the world, united through our loyalty to the Hippocratic Oath, recognize that the disastrous COVID-19 public health policies imposed on doctors and our patients are the culmination of a corrupt medical alliance of pharmaceutical, insurance, and healthcare institutions, along with the financial trusts which control them. They have infiltrated our medical system at every level, and are protected and supported by a parallel alliance of big tech, media, academics and government agencies who profited from this orchestrated catastrophe.

This corrupt alliance has compromised the integrity of our most prestigious medical societies to which we belong, generating an illusion of scientific consensus by substituting truth with propaganda. This alliance continues to advance unscientific claims by censoring data, and intimidating and firing doctors and scientists for simply publishing actual clinical results or treating their patients with proven, life-saving medicine. These catastrophic decisions came at the expense of the innocent, who are forced to suffer health damage and death caused by intentionally withholding critical and time-sensitive treatments, or as a result of coerced genetic therapy injections, which are neither safe nor effective.

The medical community has denied patients the fundamental human right to provide true informed consent for the experimental COVID-19 injections. Our patients are also blocked from obtaining the information necessary to understand risks and benefits of vaccines, and their alternatives, due to widespread censorship and propaganda spread by governments, public health officials and media. Patients continue to be subjected to forced lock-downs which harm their health, careers and children’s education, and damage social and family bonds critical to civil society. This is not a coincidence. In the book entitled “COVID-19: The Great Reset”, leadership of this alliance has clearly stated their intention is to leverage COVID-19 as an “opportunity” to reset our entire global society, culture, political structures, and economy.

Our 17,000 Global COVID Summit physicians and medical scientists represent a much larger, enlightened global medical community who refuse to be compromised, and are united and willing to risk the wrath of the corrupt medical alliance to defend the health of their patients.

The mission of the Global COVID Summit is to end this orchestrated crisis, which has been illegitimately imposed on the world, and to formally declare that the actions of this corrupt alliance constitute nothing less than crimes against humanity.

We must restore the people’s trust in medicine, which begins with free and open dialogue between physicians and medical scientists. We must restore medical rights and patient autonomy. This includes the foundational principle of the sacred doctor-patient relationship. The social need for this is decades overdue, and therefore, we the physicians of the world are compelled to take action.

After two years of scientific research, millions of patients treated, hundreds of clinical trials performed and scientific data shared, we have demonstrated and documented our success in understanding and combating COVID-19. In considering the risks versus benefits of major policy decisions, our Global COVID Summit of 17,000 physicians and medical scientists from all over the world have reached consensus on the following foundational principles:

1. We declare and the data confirm that the COVID-19 experimental genetic therapy injections must end.

2. We declare doctors should not be blocked from providing life-saving medical treatment.

3. We declare the state of national emergency, which facilitates corruption and extends the pandemic, should be immediately terminated.

4. We declare medical privacy should never again be violated, and all travel and social restrictions must cease.

5. We declare masks are not and have never been effective protection against an airborne respiratory virus in the community setting.

6. We declare funding and research must be established for vaccination damage, death and suffering.

7. We declare no opportunity should be denied, including education, career, military service or medical treatment, over unwillingness to take an injection.

8. We declare that first amendment violations and medical censorship by government, technology and media companies should cease, and the Bill of Rights be upheld.

9. We declare that Pfizer, Moderna, BioNTech, Janssen, Astra Zeneca, and their enablers, withheld and willfully omitted safety and effectiveness information from patients and physicians, and should be immediately indicted for fraud.

10. We declare government and medical agencies must be held accountable.

................

The best of the best of the best COVID-19 resources, videos, and memes:

Resources:
https://sunfellow.com/top-covid-19-resources/

Videos:
https://rumble.com/c/SunfellowCovid19

Memes:
https://sunfellow.com/the-lighter-side-of-covid-19/

List of 45 Different Murders and Pharma Drugs They Were On By Mark Reynolds

February 13, 2013. One month ago, and only three weeks after the tragic shooting at Sandy Hook, two well-known 2nd Amendment activists were found mysteriously murdered on two different rural roads on two different sides of the country. One of them, firearms manufacturer John Noveske, had posted one final warning on his Facebook page. It was a list of all the recent mass shootings, the kids responsible and the Big Pharma drugs they were taking. Within days, he was dead. Here is his list.

Below is John Noveske’s final Facebook post before his body was found on a rural Oregon road last month.

John Noveske’s company is one of the most celebrated rifle manufacturers in America. His firearms are widely considered to be some of the finest pieces of American-made hardware in the industry. In the days and weeks following the horrible tragedy in Newtown, CT and the frenzied call for gun control across the nation, many gun owners began to feel increasingly threatened.

But Noveske, one of the country’s foremost gun experts, had quickly become an expert in something else – Big Pharma drugs and their connection to mass shootings. While America’s corporate-owned news outlets invested hundreds of millions of dollars in broadcast air time to ceaselessly blame firearms for the skyrocketing number of mass killings, Noveske and millions of others noticed something else, something the media outlets funded by Big Pharma refuse to disclose for fear of upsetting their largest advertisers – all the people who carried out the bloody massacres were under the influence of pharmaceutical drugs.

Noveske took the results of his research to Facebook. There, he posted a detailed list of 45 of the most recent mass murders carried out by teenagers, young adults and even some small children. He also documented the exact pharmaceutical drugs each killer was taking at the time. As fate would have it, that would be the last Facebook post John Noveske would ever make. One week later on January 4, 2013, his lifeless body was found on the side of a rural Oregon road.

Here is the list published by John Noveske of mass murderers and the pharmaceutical drugs they were prescribed at the time of the killings. Many gun owners and critics of the pharmaceutical industry believe it wasn’t a dark, winding road that cost Noveske his life. They believe it was the publishing of this list.

The last post John Noveske ever made on his Facebook page before he was killed.

-Eric Harris age 17 (first on Zoloft then Luvox) and Dylan Klebold aged 18 (Columbine school shooting in Littleton, Colorado), killed 12 students and 1 teacher, and wounded 23 others, before killing themselves. Klebold’s medical records have never been made available to the public.

-Jeff Weise, age 16, had been prescribed 60 mg/day of Prozac (three times the average starting dose for adults!) when he shot his grandfather, his grandfather’s girlfriend and many fellow students at Red Lake, Minnesota. He then shot himself. 10 dead, 12 wounded.

-Cory Baadsgaard, age 16, Wahluke (Washington state) High School, was on Paxil (which caused him to have hallucinations) when he took a rifle to his high school and held 23 classmates hostage. He has no memory of the event.

-Chris Fetters, age 13, killed his favorite aunt while taking Prozac.

-Christopher Pittman, age 12, murdered both his grandparents while taking Zoloft.

-Mathew Miller, age 13, hung himself in his bedroom closet after taking Zoloft for 6 days.

-Kip Kinkel, age 15, (on Prozac and Ritalin) shot his parents while they slept then went to school and opened fire killing 2 classmates and injuring 22 shortly after beginning Prozac treatment.

-Luke Woodham, age 16 (Prozac) killed his mother and then killed two students, wounding six others.

-A boy in Pocatello, ID (Zoloft) in 1998 had a Zoloft-induced seizure that caused an armed stand-off at his school.

-Michael Carneal (Ritalin), age 14, opened fire on students at a high school prayer meeting in West Paducah, Kentucky. Three teenagers were killed, five others were wounded.

-A young man in Huntsville, Alabama (Ritalin) went psychotic chopping up his parents with an ax and also killing one sibling and almost murdering another.

-Andrew Golden, age 11, (Ritalin) and Mitchell Johnson, aged 14, (Ritalin) shot 15 people, killing four students, one teacher, and wounding 10 others.

-TJ Solomon, age 15, (Ritalin) high school student in Conyers, Georgia opened fire on and wounded six of his class mates.

-Rod Mathews, age 14, (Ritalin) beat a classmate to death with a bat.

-James Wilson, age 19, (various psychiatric drugs) from Breenwood, South Carolina, took a .22 caliber revolver into an elementary school killing two young girls, and wounding seven other children and two teachers.

-Elizabeth Bush, age 13, (Paxil) was responsible for a school shooting in Pennsylvania.

-Jason Hoffman (Effexor and Celexa) – school shooting in El Cajon, California.

-Jarred Viktor, age 15, (Paxil), after five days on Paxil he stabbed his grandmother 61 times.

-Chris Shanahan, age 15 (Paxil) in Rigby, ID who out of the blue killed a woman.

-Jeff Franklin (Prozac and Ritalin), Huntsville, AL, killed his parents as they came home from work using a sledge hammer, hatchet, butcher knife and mechanic’s file, then attacked his younger brothers and sister.

-Neal Furrow (Prozac) in LA Jewish school shooting reported to have been court-ordered to be on Prozac along with several other medications.

-Kevin Rider, age 14, was withdrawing from Prozac when he died from a gunshot wound to his head. Initially it was ruled a suicide. But two years later, the investigation into his death was opened as a possible homicide. The prime suspect, also age 14, had been taking Zoloft and other SSRI antidepressants.

-Alex Kim, age 13, hung himself shortly after his Lexapro prescription had been doubled.

-Diane Routhier was prescribed Welbutrin for gallstone problems. Six days later, after suffering many adverse effects of the drug, she shot herself.

-Billy Willkomm, an accomplished wrestler and a University of Florida student, was prescribed Prozac at the age of 17. His family found him dead of suicide – hanging from a tall ladder at the family’s Gulf Shore Boulevard home in July 2002.

-Kara Jaye Anne Fuller-Otter, age 12, was on Paxil when she hung herself from a hook in her closet. Kara’s parents said “…. the damn doctor wouldn’t take her off it and I asked him to when we went in on the second visit. I told him I thought she was having some sort of reaction to Paxil…”).

-Gareth Christian, Vancouver, age 18, was on Paxil when he committed suicide in 2002
(Gareth’s father could not accept his son’s death and killed himself).

-Julie Woodward, age 17, was on Zoloft when she hung herself in her family’s detached garage.

-Matthew Miller was 13 when he saw a psychiatrist because he was having difficulty at school. The psychiatrist gave him samples of Zoloft. Seven days later his mother found him dead, hanging by a belt from a laundry hook in his closet.

-Kurt Danysh, age 18, and on Prozac, killed his father with a shotgun. He is now behind prison bars, and writes letters, trying to warn the world that SSRI drugs can kill.

-Woody ____, age 37, committed suicide while in his 5th week of taking Zoloft. Shortly before his death his physician suggested doubling the dose of the drug. He had seen his physician only for insomnia. He had never been depressed, nor did he have any history of any mental illness symptoms.

-A boy from Houston, age 10, shot and killed his father after his Prozac dosage was increased.

-Hammad Memon, age 15, shot and killed a fellow middle school student. He had been diagnosed with ADHD and depression and was taking Zoloft and “other drugs for the conditions.”

-Matti Saari, a 22-year-old culinary student, shot and killed 9 students and a teacher, and wounded another student, before killing himself. Saari was taking an SSRI and a benzodiazapine.

-Steven Kazmierczak, age 27, shot and killed five people and wounded 21 others before killing himself in a Northern Illinois University auditorium. According to his girlfriend, he had recently been taking Prozac, Xanax and Ambien. Toxicology results showed that he still had trace amounts of Xanax in his system.

-Finnish gunman Pekka-Eric Auvinen, age 18, had been taking antidepressants before he killed eight people and wounded a dozen more at Jokela High School – then he committed suicide.

-Asa Coon from Cleveland, age 14, shot and wounded four before taking his own life. Court records show Coon was on Trazodone.

-Jon Romano, age 16, on medication for depression, fired a shotgun at a teacher in his New York high school.

“The news shouldn’t be left wing or right wing, conservative or liberal. It should be the news. It should be independent” – Mark Wachtler, Whiteout Press founder

Missing from list… 3 of 4 known to have taken these same meds:

-What drugs was Jared Lee Loughner on, age 21…… killed 6 people and injuring 14 others in Tuscon, Az?

-What drugs was James Eagan Holmes on, age 24….. killed 12 people and injuring 59 others in Aurora Colorado?

-What drugs was Jacob Tyler Roberts on, age 22, killed 2 injured 1, Clackamas, Or?

-What drugs was Adam Peter Lanza on, age 20, Killed 26 and wounded 2 in Newtown Ct?

*Roberts is the only one that I haven’t heard about being on drugs of some kind.

**End post**

This was John Noveske’s final Facebook post. Again, within a week, his lifeless body was found on a rural road. Keep in mind, the above information was compiled by one amateur researcher. The true cost of unnecessary pharmaceutical drugs on American society, and the list of additional unexplained killings, is unquestionably much, much longer.

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/06/mark-reynolds/list-of-45-different-murders-and-pharma-drugs-they-were-on/

Science versus Scientism (Part 1) More root cause analysis of the COVIDcrisis Robert W Malone MD, MS

“It’s very dangerous, Chuck, because a lot of what you’re seeing as attacks on me, quite frankly, are attacks on science. Because all of the things that I have spoken about consistently from the very beginning have been fundamentally based on science. Sometimes those things were inconvenient truths for people, and there was pushback against me.

So if you are trying to get at me as a public health official and scientist, you’re really attacking not only Dr. Anthony Fauci, you are attacking science. And anybody that looks at what is going on clearly sees that. You have to be asleep not to see that.”

NIH NIAID Director Anthony Fauci, quoted during a MSNBC/Chuck Todd “Meet The Press Daily” interview June 09, 2021. (Relevant Aside- Chuck Todd and MTP-Daily were dropped by MSNBC effective June 06, 2022. )

The impetus for Fauci’s famous self-own was a video from Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), who floated a theory that the Director of the NIAID was colluding with Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg to develop a narrative about COVID-19. Chuck Todd teed this up by calling the Senator’s accusation a “really wild, fantastical conspiracy”. According to Senator Blackburn:

“Dr. Fauci was emailing with Mark Zuckerberg from Facebook, trying to create that narrative,” “Cherrypicking information so that you would only know what they wanted you to know, and there would be a narrative that would fit with this cherrypicked information.”

You can see the full interview here.

With the passage of time (and a couple of pending lawsuits), we now know that the accusation of Senator Blackburn and her colleagues appears to have had significant merit.

Anthony Fauci, America’s high priest of scientism, wears out his welcome

Scientific 'progress' unrestrained by sacred principles is fraught with dangers

Everett Piper, Washington Times, April 18, 2021

OPINION:

On April 13, the editors of National Review opined: “More than a year ago, Americans welcomed [Dr.] Anthony Fauci into their homes as a sober scientist who was helping them make sense of a deadly new virus. But he has worn out that welcome.”

William F. Buckley’s heirs are absolutely right, and here’s why. 

Anthony Fauci is no longer viewed as our nation’s sober “scientist” because he’s not one. Instead, he has shown himself to be a political opportunist and our country’s new high priest of “scientism.”

Continuing…

In the early 1900s, G.K. Chesterton spoke of the unavoidable consequences of worshipping science above the sacred. Observing that the naturalists of his day were only too willing to turn their science into a philosophy and then impose their new religion upon all of culture with near fanatic zeal, Chesterton said, “I never said a word against eminent men of science. What I complain of is a vague, popular philosophy which supposes itself to be scientific when it is really nothing but a sort of new religion and an uncommonly nasty one.” 

Recognizing that science could never presume to compete in the moral arena, Chesterton went further.  “To mix science up with philosophy is only to produce a philosophy that has lost all its ideal value and a science that has lost all its practical value. It is for my private physician to tell me whether this or that food will kill me. It is for my private philosopher to tell me whether I ought to be killed.” 

Chesterton knew science could answer the questions of mathematics and medicine, but he was likewise keenly aware it had little to say about meaning and morality. He warned that scientific “progress” unrestrained by sacred principles was fraught with dangers.

Precisely. And this becomes even more of a problem when Scientism is coupled with Utilitarianism (and Marxism) as I discussed in the previous chapter “Tyranny of the Modelers”. Piper then cites prophetic words from writer and novelist CS Lewis:

C.S. Lewis also spoke of Western society’s diminishment of God’s created order while elevating personal power to fill the chaotic void. Predicting the rise of what he and others labeled “scientism,” Lewis warned of a dystopia where public policy and even moral and religious beliefs would be dictated by oligarchs only too eager to assume the role of our new cultural high priests

In his novel “That Hideous Strength,” Lewis asks an obvious question: After two world wars in which technology has brought us the “advancements” of the mass slaughter, ballistic missiles, and the atomic bomb, how is our new man-made god of “scientism” working for us? 

C. S. Lewis, November 29, 1893-- November 22, 1963

In another outstanding essay regarding the same issue, titled “Anthony Fauci, Prophet of Scientism”, Trevor Thomas also cites CS Lewis in a quote that cuts right to the heart of the matter:

[T]he new oligarchy must more and more base its claim to plan us on its claim to knowledge. If we are to be mothered, mother must know best. This means they must increasingly rely on the advice of scientists, till in the end the politicians proper become merely the scientists’ puppets. Technocracy is the form to which a planned society must tend. Now I dread specialists in power because they are specialists speaking outside their special subjects. Let scientists tell us about sciences. But government involves questions about the good for man, and justice, and what things are worth having at what price; and on these a scientific training gives a man’s opinion no added value… I dread government in the name of science. That is how tyrannies come in.

So, what is Scientism, and how is the concept behind the term important for understanding the COVIDcrisis?

Merriam-Webster: scientism (sci·​en·​tism | \ ˈsī-ən-ˌti-zəm \)

Definition of scientism

1: methods and attitudes typical of or attributed to the natural scientist

2: an exaggerated trust in the efficacy of the methods of natural science applied to all areas of investigation (as in philosophy, the social sciences, and the humanities)

The term scientism was popularized by F.A. Hayek, who defined it as the "slavish imitation of the method and language of Science". Hayek, F. A. v. (1942). "Scientism and the Study of Society. Part I". Economica. 9 (35): 267–291. doi:10.2307/2549540. JSTOR 2549540.

Karl Popper defines scientism as "the aping of what is widely mistaken for the method of science". Popper, Karl R. (1979). Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach (Revised ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press. p. 185. LCCN 79318586. OL 4489088M.

With the infamous Chuck Todd interview, which (appropriately) prompted almost universal amazement and derision from US press, international press, and members of the US public who were not already consumed by the mass formation hypnosis created around Anthony Fauci by the American Association of Medical Colleges and Corporate-State media,

The June 09, 2021 outburst and umbrage from Anthony Fauci was triggered when Chuck Todd confronted Fauci with examples of Republican politicians accusing him of colluding with Facebook leadership to establish an approved narrative which would protect his status and support his various unilateral authoritarian policy flip-flops. Speaking to Fauci of Blackburn’s comments, Todd said

“I don’t even know where to begin, but it’s a sitting United States Senator. It’s the most.. What I would call the most extreme version of what I have heard. You’ve got Kevin McCarthy doing his own version of this, Marco Rubio, you’re aware of the critiques. You’ve been debunking this. How do you debunk that? She’s got it in her own head. “Again, a sitting US Senator that represents the State of Tennessee? What do you say to that?” (note the classic gaslighting of a female US Senator from a rural state), to which Fauci replied:

“You know Chuck, I don’t have a clue what she just said, I don’t have a clue what she is talking about (shrugging his shoulders- more gaslighting), “Neither do we”, Todd interjects (whomever “we” is- more classic propaganda strategy). Fauci then states “I mean so, welcome to the club, I have no idea what she is talking about”. “And I am sorry, I do not want to be pejorative about a United States Senator, but I have no idea what she is talking about”. “And, and you know, Chuck, if you go through each and every one of the points, which are so ridiculous, as, as, as, as, you know, just painfully ridiculous, but nonetheless, if you go through each and every one of them, you can explain and debunk it immediately” (notice how smoothly he dissembles while avoiding the question?).

But Dr. Fauci never actually answered the question posed by Mr. Todd, and in retrospect it appears that this all may have been a classic distraction feint by a very smooth and experienced DC politician/bureaucrat which got out of hand. Both before and after that time, we have had multiple lines of evidence demonstrating collusion between Facebook and both US HHS and WHO. For example, Facebook has publicly stated it is assisting efforts of the White House, the CDC and the WHO to censor unwanted speech about vaccines. In fact, this pro-censorship public health messaging stance represents a longstanding relationship between Democratic party leadership, Facebook and Google, which traces back to before the COVIDcrisis. For example, On February 14, 2019, Rep Adam Schiff (D- CA) wrote to Facebook and Google leadership directly advocating for collusion and censorship on the topic of vaccine misinformation.

In a March 04, 2019 response to the Adam Schiff letter (including subsequent lawsuit), Children’s Health Defense detailed how Mr. Schiff asked Facebook to suppress and purge internet content critical of government vaccine policies. This statement provides a succinct summary of the problems with US government Scientism regarding vaccination policies, which included “challenges concerning Facebook use of so-called “independent fact-checkers,” which, in truth, are neither independent nor fact-based”. Of course, consequent to thanks to a lawsuit brought by journalist John Stossel, we have subsequently learned from Facebook’s legal team that the supposed battle against “misinformation” as a farce. Facebook finally admitted the truth: The “fact checks” that social media use to police what Americans read and watch are just “opinion.”

In the March 04, 2019 letter to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerburg, CHD provides multiple clear and compelling data- and logic-based examples of the consequences of US Government-promoted “Scientism” in action. For example:

For your company to take on the role suggested by Mr. Schiff, you would essentially be engaging in the practice of censoring information about vaccines on behalf of the government. There is no other way to logically interpret his letter, in which he expresses his expectation that your company will take measures to stop Facebook users from seeing what he calls “antivaccine” information, a term he treats synonymously with “medically inaccurate information about vaccines”. Mr. Schiff expresses his concern that certain information might discourage parents from vaccinating their child such information as “a direct threat to public health”.

Hence, his true criterion for determining what information constitutes a “threat” is truthful and accurate, but whether or not it accords with the goal of achieving high vaccination rates. In a truly Orwellian fashion, he then defines any information that could undermine that goal as “medically inaccurate”. He is, in short, employing the logical fallacy of begging the question. When he says that certain information threatens “public health”, what he really means is that it threatens public health policy.

Mr. Schiff’s false statements are indicative of the problem of how the government systematically misinforms the public about vaccine safety and effectiveness. The CDC itself is a leading purveyor of misinformation about vaccines. For example, a literature review by the prestigious Cochrane Collaboration on the safety and effectiveness of the influenza vaccine concluded that the fundamental assumptions underlying the CDC’s universal flu shot recommendation are unsupported by the scientific evidence and, furthermore, that the CDC has deliberately misrepresented the science in order to support its policy.

In a foreshadowing of the censorship, propaganda, defamation and coordinated (old and new) media policies which have directly contributed to the catastrophic global mismanagement of the COVIDcrisis, the WHO (specifically Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, who is an Ethiopian microbiologist, malaria researcher, and politician - with no medical training) issued an September 04, 2019 press release stating:

The World Health Organization welcomes the commitment by Facebook to ensure that users find facts about vaccines across Instagram, Facebook Search, Groups, Pages and forums where people seek out information and advice.

Facebook will direct millions of its users to WHO’s accurate and reliable vaccine information in several languages, to ensure that vital health messages reach people who need them the most. 

The World Health Organization and Facebook have been in discussions for several months to ensure people can access authoritative information on vaccines and reduce the spread of inaccuracies. 

Vaccine misinformation is a major threat to global health that could reverse decades of progress made in tackling preventable diseases.

Many debilitating and deadly diseases can be effectively prevented by vaccines. Think measles, diphtheria, hepatitis, polio, cholera, yellow fever, influenza… 

Major digital organizations have a responsibility to their users -- to ensure that they can access facts about vaccines and health. It would be great to see social and search platforms come together to leverage their combined reach.

We want digital actors doing more to make it known around the world that #VaccinesWork.

We want innovation that supports healthy behaviors to save lives and protect the vulnerable. So many children whose parents fully support vaccination currently lack access to these life-saving tools.   

These online efforts must be matched by tangible steps by governments and the health sector to promote trust in vaccination and respond to the needs and concerns of parents.

More recently, extensive legal documentation has become available regarding the illegal relationship by which the US Government, HHS, Fauci and specifically the CDC have conspired to restrict freedom of speech. In March, 2020, Zuckerberg communicated by email with White House Chief Medical Advisor Anthony Fauci, proposing a collaboration between Facebook and the government on COVID-related information; Fauci agreed to this collaboration, and Zuckerberg made an offer of some kind (so far undisclosed) connected to that collaboration. One month later, in April, 2020, Facebook began affirmatively directing users to the CDC’s information on COVID, and in May the company announced a new, more stringent policy against COVID “misinformation.” For more on this, see Simon Chandler, Facebook’s Coronavirus Misinformation Policy At Odds with Political Ads Stance, Forbes (Apr. 16, 2020).

Similarly, during January 2021 the White House stated that its “direct engagement” with Facebook would cause the organization to “clamp down” on so-called vaccine misinformation.  Finally, Dr. Fauci’s May, 2021 reversal of the government’s previous denunciations of the lab-leak hypothesis of COVID’s origins was followed almost immediately by Facebook’s reversal of its ban on content suggesting that COVID was “manmade or manufactured.” The close proximity of these paired events supports an inference that Facebook works jointly with and willingly takes direction from the federal government about what COVID-related speech to censor and what not to censor. See Yartzoff v. Thomas, 809 F.2d 1371, 1376 (9th Cir. 1987) (“causal inference strengthened by closeness in time between  events”).

Furthermore, Zuckerberg has contributed $35 million to the CDC (through the vehicle of the CDC Foundation), and Facebook has given millions of dollars in free advertising to the CDC. In 2021, a Facebook whistleblower revealed that Facebook censors vaccine-related content based on a secret “vaccine hesitancy” algorithm, which determines whether and to what extent the content (even if completely accurate) could induce vaccine hesitancy in viewers. Facebook banned “vaccine misinformation” and implemented the “vaccine hesitancy” algorithm pursuant to an understanding, agreement, or “meeting of the minds” with its federal “partner,” the CDC. Facebook says openly that it defers to the CDC and WHO for “authoritative information.” Moreover, Facebook openly states that it blocks content “which public health experts have advised us could lead to COVID-19 vaccine rejection” or “[other] negative outcomes.”

In light of all these facts, it is an eminently reasonable inference that the “public health experts” who “advise” and give direction to Facebook on which content to censor and suppress include federal health officials, and that Facebook’s deference was reflective of and pursuant to an agreement or understanding between Facebook and the CDC. The US Government and Facebook have sought to evade scrutiny by keeping the details of their collaboration largely secret.

In February, 2020, Facebook “opened its Menlo Park, Calif., headquarters to the WHO for a meeting with tech companies including Alphabet Inc.’s Google and Twitter Inc., where a WHO official discussed the companies’ role in spreading ‘lifesaving health information.’” For further details, see Sam Schechner, “How Facebook Hobbled Mark Zuckerberg’s Bid to Get America Vaccinated,” Wall Street Journal, September 17, 2021. Moreover, in September 2019, the WHO  publicly stated that it had “discussions for several months” with Facebook about removing “inaccuracies” from its pages as discussed above. While the WHO is ordinarily not a federal actor, it appears that the WHO is itself engaged in joint action with the CDC and is acting as CDC’s agent-in-fact in the effort to stamp out so-called COVID “misinformation,” making the WHO a federal actor in this context.

In sum, Anthony Fauci, appropriately named as “America’s high priest of scientism” by Everett Piper, has been dishonest with the American people throughout the COVIDcrisis, and has repeatedly substituted his opinions for scientifically-based factual information, directly contributing to one of the greatest losses of life, freedom and livelihood in the history of mankind. This is an embodiment of the true essence and nature of Scientism.

I have spent my whole professional life dealing with the new priesthood of Scientism, and it has always infuriated me. Scientism has nothing to do with the scientific method that I was so rigorously trained in. In my experience, those who ascribe to this substitute religion are typically second or third-rate intellects who exploit a broken system of public funding of the “Scientific” enterprise to build personal status and power, typically coupled to a cult of personality.

In addition to Drs. Anthony Fauci and Robert Gallo (both “yellow beret” products of the NIH system), particularly egregious examples include the “Gene Therapy” pioneers W French Anderson (convicted of pedophilia with 10 year old girl, formerly of NIH) and former NIH/NIAID darling and U Penn Physician/Scientist Dr. James Wilson (whose research resulted in the avoidable death of young Jesse Gelsinger). For further details concerning that sordid affair, please see “The Death of Jesse Gelsinger: New Evidence of the Influence of Money and Prestige in Human Research” by Robin Wilson. Those who have been surprised at my speaking out concerning the use and abuse of my own work involving the initial invention of mRNA vaccine technology are generally unaware that I had already destroyed one career by speaking out concerning what I knew of that PRIOR UPenn situation. In that case, in the end, no significant changes in federal policy were forthcoming. Likewise, the role of UPenn in the development and advocacy for use of pseudouridine in an “improvement” upon my prior work and patents (when in fact it is dangerous due to suppression of immune responses and drastically increases mRNA stability to months instead of hours) is also unlikely to result in significant changes in the HHS bureaucracy and its Priests of Scientism unless there are deep and significant changes in the bureaucracy and its culture backed by clear and unambiguous congressional action.

See the upcoming substack essay titled “Science versus Scientism (Part 2)” for an examination of the Scientific Method as I have been trained to practice it, and a contrast to the Scientism practiced by Anthony Fauci, Francis Collins, Rochelle Walensky, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and so many other bureaucrats masquerading as scientists.

Subscribe to Who is Robert Malone

By Robert W Malone MD  ·  Tens of thousands of paid subscribers

Medicine, science, bioethics, analytics, politics and life

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/science-versus-scientism-part-1?s=r