Another Vaccine Death as 24 yr. Old Kentucky Young Man Dies, Apparently from Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine: College Required Full Vaccination

Another young man died from the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, this time in Lockwood, New York. TrialSite just days ago reported that a 33-year-old man died recently in the New Orleans area. After vaccination with the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, Brandon Pollet became severely ill with a high fever, severe headaches, and a high number of blood clots. He died shortly thereafter. Now 24-year old George Watts Jr. died after receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. A college student, local news portrayed the young man as a “homebody” who loved video games and spending time with family. Full vaccination was a prerequisite for attending college. He received his first vaccine in August and his second in September. Watts opted for the Pfizer vaccine because it was fully approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Complications started right after the first dose, yet the young man kept this information to himself. But his parents did notice blood in their son’s urine after this dose. After the second dose, he experienced another rash of symptoms—this time flu-like conditions, which are typical for the vaccine. While symptoms persisted until October, George was rushed to the emergency room as symptoms seemed to worsen—yet none were cardiac-related at that point. He didn’t have any trace of COVID-19 infection and was diagnosed with a sinus infection and prescribed antibiotics. The parents were informed he should be better within a couple of weeks. However, the young man continued to feel ill and made another trip to the emergency room only to be told the sinus infection would simply take longer to heal. Come the end of October, the young man’s condition worsened, including pain in his hands, feet, and teeth. He started to cough up blood and became extremely sensitive to sunlight. His parents were planning on taking him to the emergency room yet again, but they never made it—on October 27, he collapsed in his room and was pronounced dead that late morning.  

George was a healthy young man with no underlying health conditions according to his father George Watts Sr. The Chief Deputy Coroner for Bradford County, Kentucky Timothy Cahill Jr. reports to Channel 18 News that George Watts Jr. died from “COVID-19 vaccine-related myocarditis.”

A rare side effect of the COVID-19 mRNA-based vaccines (both Pfizer and Moderna),  local news reports that these side effects usually show up within a few days after the vaccination.

Several studies show that young men are more likely to experience serious side effects from the mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines, including a recent study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

TrialSite has reported that in much of Northern Europe, several countries have limited the use of the Moderna mRNA-based vaccine called Spikevax, halting the use of all young people under the age of 30.  On Channel 18 News, Dr. Liviu Klein went on the record to share more information about myocarditis. Mostly an immune response impacting the heart muscle, it’s quite uncommon but occurs in the U.S. at about a rate of 10-20 per one million adults. The doctor shared that the incidence of cases associated with the COVID-19 vaccine equals about 50 per million doses administered. According to Klein, a  COVID-infected person faces a higher probability at 120 per million.

When asked if he knows of other deaths associated with the COVID-19 vaccine, Klein responded that he knows of no such deaths. Yet TrialSite has followed a handful of such deaths again one just the other day—they are very rare, but they do happen. Some critics point out that the rates are far higher but that is based on various formulas assuming deaths reported to CDC VAERS are undercounted. Over 11,000 deaths have been reported to the VAERS database in association with the COVID-19 vaccine, yet this doesn’t mean they are associated. TrialSite also reported four children in Vietnam died due to the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. Over 182 million doses have been administered and although it is tragic, these events appear to be very rare.

As TrialSite has reported, Pfizer and Moderna are shielded from any liability under the PREP act, even though the Pfizer vaccine is approved.

Meta-Analysis Sponsored by Johns Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics: COVID-19 Lockdowns An Utter Failure

Recently, Johns Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics commissioned a study on the impacts of pandemic-based lockdowns centering on COVID-19. Led by Steve H. Hanke, Professor of Applied Economics and Founder & Co-Director of The Johns Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics, Global Health, and the Study of Business Enterprise, the study’s authors also included Jonas Herby, special advisor at Center for Political Studies in Copenhagen, Denmark, as well as Lars Jonung, professor emeritus in economics at Lund University Sweden. After a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the empirical evidence in the support of the proof that lockdowns reduce COVID-19 mortality, the author’s 62-page study uncovered those lockdowns “reduced COVID-19 mortality by 0.2% on average,” a de minimis figure when understanding the impacts of such actions. The true costs of the COVID-19 lockdowns ranged from severely reducing economic activity to raising unemployment, creating the conditions for political unrest, and contributing to domestic violence while overall serving to undermine liberal democracy.

First, the authors employed searchers to identify 18,590 studies that potentially covered the belief that lockdowns reduced mortality during a pandemic-like situation. However, the authors conducted three review cycles to narrow their research down to just 34 core eligible studies, and 24 qualified for inclusion. Thereafter, the trio separated the 24 studies into three categories, including:

  • Lockdown stringency index studies

  • Shelter-in-place order (SIPO) studies

  • Specific NPI studies (non-pharmaceutical intervention)

After systematic and comprehensive analyses of each category, the scholars concluded that lockdowns don’t have the material effect that public health bureaucrats, administrative branch executives, and politicians touted. In fact, when studying stringency index studies, the authors shared that lockdown actions in Europe and the United States led only to a 0.2% reduction in mortality. Moreover, SIPOs led to only a 2.9% reduction in mortality on average. The authors also found that based on their exhaustive review of NPI studies they could find no comprehensive evidence of noticeable effects on COVID-19 mortality.

Lead Research/Investigator

Steve H. Hanke, Professor of Applied Economics and Founder & Co-Director of The Johns Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics, Global Health, and the Study of Business Enterprise

Jonas Herby, special advisor at Center for Political Studies in Copenhagen, Denmark

Lars Jonung, professor emeritus in economics at Lund University Sweden

DEAR CANADIAN TRUCKERS doctrumpet February 4, 2022

We in the United States applaud your efforts to free Canadians from government overreach including the draconian Canadian government policies regarding vaccines which are not based on science and are damaging Canadians. As a physician I would like to tell you about another colossal blunder by the Canadian government which has undoubtedly caused much unnecessary suffering and many deaths.

On August 08/6 Dr. Edward Mills at McMaster University announced the results of the TOGETHER trial in 1497 unvaccinated patients with early COVID.  Fluvoxamine, a generic antidepressant, lowered admissions 32% and mortality 91% in those who finished the trial. Dr. Mills stopped the trial because it was unethical to continue in the face of such benefit. The probability of superiority to placebo was 99%. The study was published in The Lancet Global Health 10/27. “It’s a very large treatment effect, one that has  ‘nt been observed for any drug yet,” Dr. Mills told CTV News back in October when the study was published. Incredibly some Canadian “experts”, like in the U.S., say their confidence in the data is too low to recommend it to patients. The same ridiculous stance in the US was taken to task by the Wall Street Journal 12/28. Just how much data does it take to try a a cheap, safe drug on a sick patient when you have nothing else? 

12/20 Ontario announced that they were listing fluvoxamine as a possible treatment for COVID. No one else in Canada has followed suit and few patients are receiving this safe, generic drug, $1 a day for 15 days with powerful data from Canada. Entrepreneur Steve Kirsch who funded the trial says almost no one treated with fluvoxamine gets long COVID which normally affects 20-40%. One can make a case that for that reason alone all Canadians with COVID should have been offered treatment.

To this day few Canadians have received any treatment when they get COVID prior to hospitalization. All Canadians should have been offered fluvoxamine since August when the more serious delta variant dominated. This failure has led to much needless suffering and death. 

The ridiculous Canadian vaccine mandates which you are opposing include vaccinating the 50% of the country who were previously infected and have arguably better immunity than those vaccinated. Those with prior infection have little if anything to gain and risk the considerable vaccine side effects. With recent reports that insurance companies saw a 40% increase in all-cause mortality in 2021 and the US Department of Defense data suggesting huge increases in many medical problems in 2021, one can’t blame the unvaccinated for thinking COVID is less dangerous to them than the vaccines. 

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)  has done even less than Canada with fluvoxamine and has been sitting on an emergency use authorization for fluvoxamine since 12/21. If fluvoxamine were a branded drug company product it would have received immediate emergency use authorization quickly as happened with molnupiravir whose data wasn’t quite as good as fluvoxamine and  in fact, appears to have significant safety consideration—the drug is produced by Merck. 

It appears that for the most part the Canadian government does whatever the US does, ignoring the fact that every decision made by US governmental health care agencies is for the benefit of drug companies. Is Mr. Trudeau afraid of embarrassing the US by doing something smart while the US blunders its way through the pandemic? 

How about Mr. Trudeau  doing something smart for Canadians by offering all of them fluvoxamine for COVID if they get sick. It would keep a lot of people out of the hospital.

Michael B. Goodkin MD, FACC 

Healthy 33 Year Old Dies After Second Pfizer Vaccination Leads to Severe Autoimmune Disorders

A healthy 33-year-old man with a wife and one-year-old daughter died from the second dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine known as BNT162b2 or “Comirnaty.” Just 48 hours after receiving his second dose at the end of August,  Brandon Pollet became severely ill with a high fever, severe headaches, and a high number of blood clots reports the family’s GoFundMe profile. What appeared as severe autoimmune conditions only worsened by October 21, when Brandon was first admitted to the hospital: he remained there 9 days and returned home on November 2. Yet he remained very ill, as he was unable to lower consistently high body temperature and continuously battled weakness. He finally had to return to the hospital on December 12 undergoing treatment for Still’s Disease and adult-onset HLH disease. Treatments included chemo and steroid treatments as well as daily insulin and infusion of blood products. Huge bills piled up as can be imagined in the American health care system while his wife, Jessica, took FMLA leave to support her husband. As reported by local media, Brandon died on January 28th as physicians there in Louisiana acknowledged a direct relation to the second COVID-19 vaccine dose, reports the family and local media.

While the official stance of most of the medical establishment, from the National Institutes of Health to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Food and Drug Administration to the administrations of the largest health systems is that serious adverse events and death are rare given the sheer magnitude of the COVID-19 mass vaccination program: yet TrialSite suggests that rare still can equal a sizeable number of incidents. 

According to the CDC’s VAERs website, reports of deaths post-vaccination are “rare,” yet in the VAERS database more deaths have been reported in 2021 than in the previous decade combined. Of course, this doesn’t prove that the vaccine was associated with the deaths, but the numbers are truly concerning, and more investigation needs to be done. TrialSite reviews CDC’s point of view on serious adverse events and deaths. In any other normal situation, the number of deaths reported in the CDC adverse event reporting system (VAERS) would have tripped the stop switch.

Serious Adverse Event TypeRelevant Data/CommentsAnaphylaxis, a severe type of allergic reaction5 people per one million vaccinatedThrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) after J&J vaccine—blood clots in large blood vessels and low platelets57 confirmed reports out of 18 million doses CDC identified 9 deaths that were the result of TTS following J&J vaccination. Women aged 30-49 face greater risk. Thus far 3 confirmed cases associated with ModernaGuillain-Barré Syndrome, Associated with J&J and involves the body’s immune system damaging nerve cells302 reports of GBS; risk after 21 days 21 times higher with J&J than Pfizer or Moderna. After 42 days the risk of GBS is 11 times higher with J&J.Myocarditis/Pericarditis, associated with mRNA vaccines (Pfizer & Moderna); inflammation of the heart muscle (myocarditis) and inflammation of the outer lining of the heart (pericarditis).2,132 reports of both (preliminary) among people aged 30 and below. Note in Nordic countries Moderna was put on hold for people under 30 due to concerns. Through follow-up analysis of medical records 1,233 reports of myocarditis.Deaths11,657 deaths out of 535 million doses administered (0.0022%).

Again, based on what has been an unprecedented mass vaccination, the total number of deaths in VAERS according to this CDC website (11,657) would be considered rare. The CDC includes a statement denoting that just because they are reported doesn’t mean that such deaths relate to the vaccine. TrialSite reminds readers that the COVID-19 pandemic response mass vaccination was done under the protective umbrella of the PREP Act, a questionable FDA approval, and attempted mandates. 

Pfizer secured an unprecedented $33 billion in year one pandemic monetization effort. Despite the benefits of vaccination (the vaccine does reduce the probability of hospitalization and death and over 850,000 people have died during the pandemic) principles of consent, biomedical ethics, and scientific transparency, not to mention patient-centricity drive this media platform and social network to continue reporting on the world of clinical research with a critical eye-raising pressing concerns, information, and insight.

A growing number of researchers, physicians, and health care professionals carefully and quietly express concerns about the vaccines. TrialSite has directly raised concerns ranging from leaked biodistribution and regulatory documents to Sonia Elijah’s piece thanks to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) release back in August of 2021 opening access to vaccine documentation the company relied upon to approved the vaccine for individuals aged 16 and above.  More currently the battle to access the regulatory filing documentation continues. The company and FDA sought to delay the entire release for 55 years! Concerns raised are most often summarily dismissed by much of the medical community and of course targeted for what appears to be biased, non-objective so-called fact-checkers. TrialSite suggests that formal investigations are necessary to ensure trust in public health and industry.

Makes the Local News

The family lived in St. Charles Parish (New Orleans area) prior to moving to Ponchatoula to the north, reports Monique Roth writing for the local Herald Guide. Brandon’s wife Jessica was quoted by Ms. Roth’s piece reporting after the last dose “He was worked up for hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, or HLH, but it was ruled out and he was diagnosed with a rare autoimmune disease called Still’s Disease,” Jessica said. “After discharge, Brandon went home for about a month and was then re-hospitalized Dec. 14.”

She continued, “He received the HLH protocol treatment, which included chemotherapy,” she said last week. “Unfortunately, none of the usual treatments have worked. The doctors have agreed that the COVID vaccine caused an immune response that led to the development of the autoimmune disease and HLH.”

Brandon worked at a nearby Shell Oil plant where he was a mechanic, and his wife reports co-workers have been wonderfully supportive to the family along with the community in St. Charles Parish.

Kansas Is the New Battlefield in the Ivermectin War

In an ongoing national debate about doctors prescribing ivermectin as an early treatment for Covid-19, Kansas lawmakers are moving forward with a bill to defund investigations into physicians who prescribe the controversial drug. The legislation supports State Senator Mark Steffen, an anesthesiologist, who has prescribed ivermectin to patients. Steffen has been under investigation by the Kansas State Board of Healing Arts for a year for writing prescriptions for the disputed medication. He hopes those probes will be a thing of the past.

This bill is not unique to Kansas. Last month, Virginia killed a similar bill in committee. Comparable legislation is also in the works in Iowa, Tennessee, Oklahoma, and Indiana. Opposition and favor of ivermectin legislation usually fall along party lines. Republicans are in favor, and Democrats are opposed.

The current Kansas bill, which would deny doctor oversite is raising “ethical flags.” The measure may eliminate scrutiny of Steffen’s actions and is being criticized by Common Cause, a group that promotes government accountability. “Legislators are not elected to represent themselves. They are elected to represent the people that elected them,” a spokesperson of Common Cause said, adding “self-interested legislation has no place in American democracy.” Steffen says the legislation has nothing to do with him but a belief that off-label medications, like ivermectin, which are not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), are lifesaving. Representative Jason Probst, a Democrat, has called Steffen’s actions regarding the legislation “ethically dubious”. 

Senator Steffen has been consistent with his advocacy of ivermectin. The drug continues to be politically divisive and has been labeled an “anti-vaxxer” issue. Nationally, the medication has become the dividing line between the two dominant political parties in the United States. Once called a “miracle drug,” ivermectin has been used to cure river blindness, scabies, and even head lice. Opponents of the generic medication and the FDA have called the drug a “horse de-wormer” because veterinarians do use it in different formulations and dosages to treat animals. Doctors have lost jobs for prescribing ivermectin to treat covid, and conservatives in the elected officials see a political advantage in advocating for use of the drug. Physicians favoring the medication have called it “cheap and safe.”  TrialSite has chronicled the COVID-19 research starting in April 2020 when University of Monash scientists saw that in a cell culture, the drug absolutely zapped SARS-CoV-2. The level and extent of research in ivermectin, including approximately three dozen randomized controlled trials, has been suppressed by U.S. media. On the other hand, a couple of high-profile ivermectin studies failed to show any efficacy. One study in Egypt included questionable, possibly manipulated data. Yet hit pieces have followed, such as a well-known reporter from the Los Angeles Times who was called out by the TrialSite.

Further complicating the political divide is the fact health insurance companies have paid for ivermectin prescriptions. However, since the FDA warned against usage of the medication, many druggists are refusing to fill ivermectin prescriptions. The one-time “miracle drug” has now turned into a political lightning rod.  

Micro Blood Clots: Key to Explaining COVID Harm Joel S Hirschhorn February 4, 2022

What should receive far greater attention is the formation of microscopic blood clots throughout bodies caused by spike proteins.  These are not found through conventional medical scanning and imaging technologies.

Know this: They result from COVID spike proteins that screw up fine blood vessels causing micro blood clots.  The spike protein molecules from COVID infection are the same as what happens when COVID vaccines pump huge numbers of them into your body.  So, vaccines create the same blood clot problem as COVID itself in many people.

Subscribe to the Trialsitenews "Ivermectin" Channel

No spam - we promise

This article uses micro blood clots to explain three important pandemic problems:

1.  Vaccine adverse health impacts, including deaths

2.  A broad array of COVID infection illnesses and deaths

3.  Millions of people with “long” COVID suffering diverse health problems.

Micro blood clot problems

What can these micro blood clots cause?  That is the key question.  There is nothing but bad news that very few people are aware of.  Understand this: You do not want micro blood clots throughout your body.  Finding proof that you have them is difficult.

Blood clots that occur in the tiniest blood vessels are referred to as microvascular thromboses and reduce blood flow. The clinical symptoms depend on the organs that are most strongly affected.

Here is the main point: Many patients can experience micro blood clotting that isn’t visible to the naked eye or normal scans, but produce bad impacts. When pumped to the lungs they may be diagnosed as pulmonary embolisms.  If they reach the brain, they can cause a stroke or confusion.  If they lodge in the heart, they can cause a heart attack or promote inflammation.  If they lodge in the smaller blood vessels that provide oxygen to the hands or feet, they can cause those limbs to go numb and possibly require amputation.  Clots in other organs, such as the liver or the kidneys, could cause those organs to fail.

The diagnosis from the clotting depends largely on where the clots end up lodging, which explains why people who take spike protein “vaccine” shots experience such a wide array of injuries and deaths.  Over one million injuries are now reported in VAERS CDC database, with estimates of hundreds of thousands of deaths so far in the USA alone.

The eminent Dr. Peter McCollough, a truly great medical expert, has addressed micro clots.  Early in the pandemic he noted that “the Spike Protein itself caused Coagulation or Blood Clotting.  And a unique type of Coagulation.  It caused the Red Blood Cells to stick together.  At the same time the Platelets stick together.  So, this is a very different type of Blood Clotting that we would see with major Blood Clots in the Arteries and Veins.  For instance, Blood Clots involved in Stroke and Heart Attack.  Blood Clots involved in major Blood Vessels in the Legs.  This was a different type of Clotting and in fact the Italians courageously did some Autopsies and found Micro Blood Clots in the Lungs.  And so, we understood in the end, the reason why the Lungs fail is not because the virus is there.  It is because Micro Blood Clots are there.  When People can’t breathe, the problem is micro-blood clotting in the lungs.  The spicule on the ball of the virus itself damages blood vessels that causes blood clotting.”

Probably most people who have late stage COVID and die have severe lung problems and micro clots are a likely cause.

Now you get to the key and mostly ignored point.  COVID vaccines can insert spike proteins just like the ones created by COVID infection.  Should we expect health problems from COVID vaccines just like ones from COVID infection?  Yes!

Canadian doctor blew the whistle about micro clots from vaccines

Months ago in July 2021 a brave and smart Canadian doctor, Charles Hoffe, went public with his findings on COVID vaccinated patients.  Using the d-dimer test of blood he found that 62% of hundreds of his vaccinated patients had high numbers indicating the presence of micro blood clots.  A d-dimer test measures the amount of degraded fibrin in the blood.

He did more than just release that finding.  He said that the use of mRNA vaccines would “kill most people through heart failure.”

Note that in April 2021 Dr. Hoffe wrote an open letter to the Provincial Health Officer for British Columbia trying to get the Canadian government to recognize the bad vaccine impacts related to micro blood clots.  He was not successful in stopping use of the COVID vaccines.

Trying to get media attention, the doctor worked to warn the public and the medical community that the vast majority of people who are getting injected with the genetic experimental vaccines will die within a few short years from heart failure.

He explained that he observed in his patients who took an mRNA (messenger RNA) “vaccine” from either Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna that their capillaries were now plugging up, which he says will eventually lead to a serious cardiovascular event.

In plain language he said that the mRNA shots are programmed to turn a person’s body into a spike protein “factory,” and that over time these mass-produced spike proteins cause progressive blood clotting.

He said what other medical experts have expressed, namely that only 25 percent of the ‘vaccine’ injected into a person’s arm actually stays in your arm.  The other 75 percent is collected by your lymphatic system and literally fed into your circulation so these little packages of messenger RNA invade your body.  And in a single dose of Moderna ‘vaccine’ there are literally 40 trillion mRNA molecules.

Dr. Hoffe said that while these packages were designed by Big Pharma to be absorbed directly into people’s cells, the only place they can actually be absorbed is around the blood vessels and into capillary networks, which are the tiniest blood vessels where blood flow is slow and where genes are released.

“Your body then gets to work reading and then manufacturing trillions and trillions of these spike proteins,” he said.  “Each gene can produce many, many spike proteins. The body then recognizes these are foreign bodies so it makes antibodies against it so you are then protected against COVID.  That’s the idea.”  Now we know that this theory does not assure destruction of the virus or transmission of it, nor effective immunity.

Here is what you need to understand: Though the claim has long been that these spike proteins act as a deterrent to viral infection after being injected into a person’s body, the reality is that they actually become part of the cell wall of a person’s vascular endothelium or linings of the blood vessels.  In very small diameter blood vessels the spikes have a big impact on blood flow.

Your blood vessels are supposed to be smooth so that your blood flows smoothly.  After spike proteins invade your body the small blood vessels have these little spikey bits sticking out which impede blood flow and can cause clots.  And if you get a lot of clots, then your blood platelet count can greatly decrease, and this can lead to bleeding problems.

Dr. Hoffe says it is an inevitability that the vaccine injected will develop blood clots because as the vaccine-inserted spike proteins embed themselves within blood vessels and capillaries, blood platelets circulate around trying to fix the problem by creating increasingly more clots.

“So, when the platelet comes through the capillary it suddenly hits all these COVID spikes and it becomes absolutely inevitable that blood clots will form to block that vessel,” he writes.  Therefore, these spike proteins can predictably cause blood clots.  They are in your blood vessels (if mRNA ‘vaccinated’) so it is guaranteed.”

What must be remembered is that these blood clots are different than the “rare” ones spoken about by physicians that show up on CT scans and MRIs or even ultrasound images.  These are microscopic and do not show up on tests, as they can only be detected using a blood test known as d-dimer.  And nearly all doctors do not routinely use this test.

Dr. Hoffe performed d-dimer tests on his mRNA “vaccinated” patients, which led him to the discovery that at least 62 percent of them have these microscopic blood clots.  Why some people do not get the clots is not entirely clear.

“The most alarming part of this is that there are some parts of the body like the brain, spinal cord, heart and lungs which cannot [regenerate],” he said. “When those tissues are damaged by blood clots, they are permanently damaged.”  That is the deadly issue for understanding why there are huge numbers of vaccinated people who have suffered death or a broad array of serious health impacts from COVID vaccines.

Micro clots in COVID patients

While there has been very limited medical research on micro clots from vaccines, there has been much more on micro clots in COVID patients.  Here are some findings from a key study in August 2021 with the title “Study identifies micro clots as cause of death in some severely ill COVID-19 patients.”

Loma Linda University Health researchers found that severely ill COVID-19 patients likely die as the result of micro clots formed in the lungs that spread to cause deadly damage to organs throughout the body. This finding differed from the current view that the COVID-19 virus travels to the body’s organs and damages blood vessel lining in those organs.

According to this research, once the clotting process begins, the body is no longer fighting against the virus but mostly against the clotting process instead.

“This could change our approach to fighting this disease because we may have been looking in the wrong place,” saids Brian Bull, MD, a pathologist, former dean of the Loma Linda University School of Medicine, and the study’s first author. “We have been looking for a treatment against a viral disease, but we should now also look for therapy for a viral disease that has transformed into a clotting disorder.”

In another study, “A macrophage attack culminating in microthromboses characterizes COVID 19 pneumonia,” published in the Journal of Immunity, Inflammation and Disease, proposes an explanation for why COVID-19 patients die from a vast array of conditions such as strokes, heart attacks, kidney failure, or failure of several organs at the same time.

“We face the problem of not yet understanding the physiological disorders well enough to explain how a viral disease like COVID-19 kills people in such a diverse and difficult-to-predict fashion.” Dr. Bull said.

Bull and co-author Karen Hay contend that showers of tiny clots form and block micro-blood vessels in the bodies of many severely ill COVID-19 patients.  Though invisible to the naked eye, the micro clots can damage and kill tiny portions of whichever organ tissue — brain, heart, liver, kidney, lung, etc. — the blocked blood vessels feed.

“Clotting in really sick COVID-19 patients is not something trivial and unimportant — it may well be fundamental to what is going on” said Dr. Bull

But how do these micro clots form and travel throughout the body?  Bull provides a broad overview of this disease process:

When the body senses a COVID-19 infection, large white blood cells called monocytes respond and gather in the air sacs of the lungs.

Over the course of a few days, the monocytes transform into macrophages — the “demolition and cleanout crew” for infected and damaged tissue in the body.  The macrophages attack the virus-laden cells that line the inside of the air sacs.  Unfortunately, macrophages may also chew right through the virus-laden air sac lining to the blood vessels that surround each air sac.  This is the place in the body where the blood picks up oxygen when we breathe.  If the macrophages puncture these blood vessels the air sac will fill up with blood.

A protein produced by the macrophages on their surfaces causes the blood to clot.  When a clot forms an enzyme, thrombin, interacts with a protein in the blood known as fibrinogen to produce fibrin strands or fibrils.  When these fibrin strands accumulate, they become a clot.  These fibrils can be still soluble if they remain short enough (about 25 molecules or less).  Anything longer than that becomes insoluble and will appear as tiny clots.

Short chains of fibrin, still soluble, can travel in the blood supply to all of the body’s organs. As long as the fibrin chains remain short, this will cause no problems, but if more thrombin is coming from clots in the lungs, then more fibrin is continually being fed into the blood.  This makes the chains of fibrin grow longer; they grow too long to remain in solution and showers of micro clots will form.

These micro clots will block the tiny blood vessels that nourish the tissue making up each of the body’s organs, making the organs less able to perform their necessary function.  The organs (heart, kidney, brain, etc.) with little patches of dead and dying tissue throughout will, sooner or later, fail.

Indeed, when Bull and Hay monitored three COVID-19 patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit for tell-tale clotting biomarkers — the still soluble fibrin chains — they found that in a matter of four days, all of the fibrinogen in the patients’ bodies had transformed into soluble fibrin chains at levels five times higher than normal.  Body organs were severely damaged in all three patients.  Two of them died in the hospital, and the third survived but suffered severe brain damage.

Although Bull and Hay found blood clotting was taking place by tracking the bio-markers and performing clotting tests, no visible clots were detected in any of the three patients.  The likeliest explanation, Bull states, is that those clots were present but were too small to be seen.

“Here in this study we have three patients in which clearly a massive clotting disorder occurred over a very short period,” Bull said.

Bull said in a year and a half of searching for therapeutic modalities, the medical community has not come up with any anti-viral medications that have had a significant beneficial effect on COVID-19. Yet, heparin, an anti-clotting drug, not an anti-viral medication, has proven highly beneficial and is now being given to virtually all hospitalized, severely ill COVID-19 patients.

[This author has also researched the use of ivermectin for late state COVID and concluded that it can work because of its anti-inflammatory property.]

“Clotting in really sick COVID-19 patients is not something trivial and unimportant — it may well be fundamental to what is going on,” Bull said.

The point of giving all these details is to show that what spike proteins cause in ill COVID patients can also be what is happening in many vaccinated people.  Just as Dr. Hoffe had predicted.  And why a few million people worldwide have had adverse health impacts from vaccines, including probably a few hundred thousand deaths.

German research (Microvascular dysfunction in COVID-19: the MYSTIC study) made several important observations about small capillaries impacted by micro clots.  The loss of small capillaries correlated with high d-dimer levels.  And the velocity of red blood cells in the smallest capillaries was significantly lower in those patients with severe lung problems who were mechanically ventilated.  Low blood flow means less oxygen getting to where it is most needed.

Long covid has clot cause

Now we come to the third area of medical research that has also found micro clots as the likely cause of that is being called “long” COVID; which refers to people who seem to have successfully recovered from COVID but live with serious residual health problems that are related to their previous COVID infection.  Sadly, some doctors have said these persistent health problems are psychological in nature.

Here some new research is summarized that finds the cause of persistent health problems are micro blood clots.

In October 2021 the material in this article was originally published in the journal Cardiovascular Diabetology in August 2021.

“Inflammatory micro clots in blood of individuals suffering from Long COVID.”  The research was done at Stellenbosch University in South Africa.  Researchers found an overload of various inflammatory molecules, ‘trapped’ inside insoluble microscopic blood clots (micro clots), in the blood of individuals suffering from lingering symptoms experienced by individuals with long COVID.

This important finding was made by Prof. Resia Pretorius, a researcher in the Department of Physiological Science at Stellenbosch University.  She started looking at micro clots and their molecular content in blood samples from individuals with long COVID.  The findings have since been peer-reviewed and published in the journal

“We found high levels of various inflammatory molecules trapped in micro clots present in the blood of individuals with Long COVID.  Some of the trapped molecules contain clotting proteins such as fibrinogen, as well as alpha(2)-antiplasmin,” Prof. Pretorius explained.

Alpha(2)-antiplasmin is a molecule that prevents the breakdown of blood clots, while fibrinogen is the main clotting protein.  Under normal conditions the body’s plasmin-antiplasmin system maintains a fine balance between blood clotting (the process by which blood thickens and coagulate to prevent blood loss after an injury) and fibrinolysis (the process of breaking down the fibrin in the coagulated blood to prevent blood clots from forming).

With high levels of alpha(2)-antiplasmin in the blood of COVID-19 patients and individuals suffering from long COVID, the body’s ability to break down the clots are significantly inhibited.

The insolubility of the micro clots became apparent through specific analysis of blood plasma samples from individuals with acute COVID and long COVID; they continued to deposit insoluble pellets in collection devices.

This is the first research group to have reported on finding micro clots in the blood samples from individuals with long COVID, using fluorescence microscopy and proteomics analysis, thereby solving yet another puzzle associated with the disease.

“Of particular interest is the simultaneous presence of persistent anomalous micro clots and a pathological fibrinolytic system,” they write in the research paper.  “This implies that the plasmin and antiplasmin balance may be central to pathologies in Long COVID, and provides further evidence that COVID-19, and now Long COVID, have significant cardiovascular and clotting pathologies.”

In other words, this research connects with what has been found in COVID patients with micro blood clots.

To date they have collected blood from one hundred long COVID individuals who participated in the long COVID registry which launched in May 2021, as well as from 30 healthy individuals.

The Guardian article

This research was seen as a very important development in a January 2022 article in The Guardian with the heading “Could microclots help explain the mystery of long Covid?”  It was written by Resia Pretorius, one of the senior South African researchers.  “My lab has found significant microclot formation in long Covid patients.  Unfortunately, these are missed in routine blood tests.”

Here are more excerpts from this article that was aimed at informing the world about the importance of micro clots.

“One of the biggest failures during the Covid-19 pandemic is our slow response in diagnosing and treating long Covid.  As many as 100 million people worldwide already suffer from long Covid.  That staggering number will eventually be much higher, if we take into account that diagnoses are still inadequate, and that we still do not know what the impact of Omicron and future variants will be.”

“Patients with long Covid complain of numerous symptoms, the main ones being recurring fatigue and brain fog, muscle weakness, being out of breath and having low oxygen levels, sleep difficulties and anxiety or depression.  Some patients are so sick that they cannot work or even walk a few steps.  There is possibly also an elevated risk of stroke and heart attacks.  One of the biggest sources of concern is that even mild and sometimes asymptomatic initial Covid-19 infection may lead to debilitating, long-term disability.”  [That last sentence is especially important.]

“Since early 2020, we and other researchers have pointed out that acute Covid-19 is not only a lung disease, but actually significantly affects the vascular (blood flow) and coagulation (blood clotting) systems.”

“In blood from patients with long Covid, persistent microclots are resistant to the body’s own fibrinolytic processes.  We found high levels of various inflammatory molecules trapped in the persistent microclots, including clotting proteins like plasminogen, fibrinogen and Von Willebrand factor (VWF), and also Alpha-2 antiplasmin (a molecule that prevents the breakdown of microclots).”

“The presence of persistent microclots and hyperactivated platelets (also involved in clotting) perpetuates coagulation and vascular pathology, resulting in cells not getting enough oxygen in the tissues to sustain bodily functions (known as cellular hypoxia).  Widespread hypoxia may be central to the numerous reported debilitating symptoms.”

And here is what long COVID victims need to know: “So why can long Covid patients not go to their nearest clinic or health care practitioner to find treatment options?  Currently there are no general pathology tests readily available to diagnose these patients.  Desperately ill patients are told that their pathology test results are within normal/healthy ranges. Many are then told that their symptoms are possibly psychological and they should try meditation or exercise.  The main reason the traditional lab tests do not pick up any of the inflammatory molecules is that they are trapped inside the fibrinolytic-resistant microclots (visible under a fluorescence or bright-field microscope, as our research has shown). When the molecular content of the soluble part of the plasma is measured, the inflammatory molecules, including auto-antibodies, are simply missed.”

Remember that Dr. Hoffe used the d-dimer test to confirm the presence of micro blood clots, and this test can be ordered by your physician.  Also, many pro-ivermectin articles invoke not merely the anti-viral property that works to address initial COVID infection, but also its anti-inflammatory property more important after the initial viral replication phase.

Autopsy findings

There is also a fairly large medical literature with findings of micro blood clots from autopsies.  Here is just one example published in 2020 by Dr. Amy Rapkiewicz, the chairman of the department of pathology at NYU Langone Medical Center,

Describing the work in a news story was this: “The clotting was not only in the large vessels but also in the smaller vessels.  And this was dramatic, because though we might have expected it in the lungs, we found it in almost every organ that we looked at in our autopsy study,” the researcher said.

This too was noted in another news story: “We knew that clinical people were finding clots in these [COVID] patients,” she said. “So although I knew that that was going to be there, I didn’t expect it at the microscopic level to the degree that I saw it.”  Her autopsy study found blood clots in small vessels of the patients’ lungs, hearts, kidneys and livers.

In another news story this was noted in 2020 about research at Harvard University: “Researchers also noted that patients with the novel coronavirus suffered many microscopic blood clots.  In a stark difference with lungs infected with the flu, the micro-clots were nine times as present in areas of the lungs that allow the passage of oxygen into the patient’s bloodstream while carbon dioxide is emitted.”

This is from the published medical study: “Histologic analysis of pulmonary vessels in patients with Covid-19 showed widespread thrombosis with microangiopathy.  Alveolar capillary microthrombi were 9 times as prevalent in patients with Covid-19 as in patients with influenza.  In lungs from patients with Covid-19, the amount of new vessel growth — predominantly through a mechanism of intussusceptive angiogenesis — was 2.7 times as high as that in the lungs from patients with influenza.”  In other words, micro blood clots were uniquely associated with COVID infection.

This is the title of a May 2020 medical article: “Pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2: Targeting of endothelial cells renders a complex disease with thrombotic microangiopathy and aberrant immune response. The Mount Sinai COVID-19 autopsy experience.”  Here is the summary of the findings; note the word micro:

“Autopsies were performed at the Mount Sinai Hospital on 67 COVID-19 positive patients and data from the clinical records were obtained from the Mount Sinai Data Warehouse.  The experimental design included a comprehensive microscopic examination carried out by a team of expert pathologists, along with transmission electron microscopy, immunohistochemistry,”

“We report a comprehensive autopsy series of 67 COVID-19 positive patients revealing that this disease, so far conceptualized as a primarily respiratory viral illness, also causes endothelial dysfunction, a hypercoagulable state [an increased tendency to develop blood clots], and an imbalance of both the innate and adaptive immune responses.  Novel findings reported here include an endothelial phenotype of ACE2 in selected organs, which correlates with clotting abnormalities and thrombotic microangiopathy, addressing the prominent coagulopathy and neuropsychiatric symptoms.  Another original observation is that of macrophage activation syndrome, with hemophagocytosis and a hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like disorder, underlying the microangiopathy [disorder involving small blood vessels]and excessive cytokine release.”  In other words, this study also found evidence of micro clots in COVID victims.

Lastly, is the work of Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi.  He has noted: “immune and blood-related categories of risks from vaccines: (1) Clotting from the direct action of spike protein in the bloodstream; (2) Further clotting from the immune system attacking spike-producing endothelial cells.”  This too was said: “The RNA injected into your body are going to enter the cells that line blood vessels.  He points to spiny spike protein that these cells will generate and protrude outwards to attract blood platelets and form micro-clots.  Days after vaccination, white blood cells known as lymphocytes as well as antibodies will begin to mount an attack against these cells.  If you dare to repeat this (get the second jab), “God help you” warns Dr Bhakdi.”  He warned about the blood clot side-effects months before the roll-out of the mRNA vaccines.

Conclusions

Micro blood clots are linked to spike proteins coming from COVID infection OR vaccines that introduce them into the body or cause the body to produce them.

Micro blood clots seem to be the likely cause of many millions of health impacts and deaths from COVID infection as well as from COVID vaccines, and even many millions of long COVID victims suffering diverse health problems with no apparent medical solution.

Have you heard any government or public health official speak of micro blood clots?  Probably not.  But not because they are insignificant.  Now, you probably know more than them.  Now you realize that there has been a scandal of enormous proportions.  Suppressing so much negative information about spike protein induced micro blood clots.

Dr. Joel S. Hirschhorn, author of Pandemic Blunder and many articles and podcasts on the pandemic, worked on health issues for decades, and his Pandemic Blunder Newsletter is on Substack. As a full professor at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, he directed a medical research program between the colleges of engineering and medicine. As a senior official at the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment and the National Governors Association, he directed major studies on health-related subjects; he testified at over 50 US Senate and House hearings and authored hundreds of articles and op-ed articles in major newspapers. He has served as an executive volunteer at a major hospital for more than 10 years. He is a member of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, and America’s Frontline Doctors.

Shocking video shows increasing number of illnesses in US military following covid vaccines

A viral video compiled using the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) showed a sharp increase in the number of illnesses in the U.S. military presumably due to the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine.

DMED is similar to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), except that it pertains only to Department of Defense (DOD) personnel, with medical providers putting information into the system.

Attorney Thomas Renz referenced the database during a panel discussion recently hosted by Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson. According to Renz, three whistleblowers said that post-vaccination miscarriages and cancers were up 300 percent over the past year, and neurological disorders increased ten-fold among DOD personnel.

See the video here.