An Open Letter to Dr. Grace Lee, CDC ACIP Chairperson on Transparency

The smoking syringe: booster dosing as a temporary fix to negative effectiveness of primary series? An open letter to Dr. Grace Lee, Chairperson of ACIP on transparency

Dear ACIP Chairperson Dr. Lee,

Comment Tracking Number

kw6-znlk-aep4

Subscribe to the Trialsitenews "COVID-19" Channel

No spam - we promise

CDC-2021-0125

Detailed discussion is given below and attached.

At the end of today’s (Nov 19) ACIP meeting, you stressed how important it is for ACIP proceedings to be transparent and to allow for diverse views to be expressed. There was nothing transparent about these proceedings.

The data disclosed today by Pfizer, consistent with data generated by others intensify serious concerns about the Covid vaccine program. FDA, NIH, and CDC are attempting to boost us out of this mess with ever-more concerning cumulative dosing of products that have been acknowledged (Moderna 2Q 2020 SEC report) to be considered as “gene therapy products” by FDA and which attract far higher safety scrutiny (5-15 years long term follow up) than classical vaccines.

If you truly value diversity of opinion I will gladly take your call to discuss how this can be incorporated into the workings of ACIP.

Respectfully

David Wiseman PhD, MRPharmS

synechion@aol.com

  1. I am subscribed to receive ACIP email alerts and did not receive any. This was a hastily announced meeting. Can I have your personal assurance that I am not on a blacklist?

  2. There was no opportunity to submit written comments prior to the meeting as the information page did not provide a docket number.

“Any member of the public can submit a written public comment to ACIP. Written comments must be received by TBA for the November 19, 2021, ACIP Meeting, identified by Docket No. TBA using the Federal eRulemaking Portalexternal icon. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. All submissions received must include the agency name and Docket Number.”

At the time of writing this letter, the page still does not display the docket number.

  1. The agenda was not provided until approximately the start of the meeting. Similar things have happened before.

  2. The slide presentations were only provided some time afterwards. The presentation by Dr. Oliver was only provided towards to the end of the meeting. The public had no opportunity to review any data and to make comments thereon.

  3. The ACIP meeting took place after FDA had given wider authorization to booster dosing ONLY this morning. FDA did this with no VRBPAC meeting. Their lack of transparency reflects on ACIP’s transparency, as normally much of the data discussed at ACIP would have already been discussed a week or two earlier at an equivalent VRBPAC meeting. No transparency there.

  4. Are ACIP members aware that FDA have authorized a formulation change for the Pfizer adult vaccine based only on “analytical comparability” and without any biological assessment of the impact on safety or efficacy? In other words, all clinical data to date (including in children) for the Pfizer vaccine has been with the old formulation. This will affect all those Americans who will now be receiving the booster doses. As someone with experience in pharmaceutical development it is inconceivable why FDA did not ask for, or why Pfizer did not perform any in vitro transfection, in vivo toxicology, biodistribution or even human safety studies. Your committee has just given the green light for a formulation for which there are NO SAFETY OR EFFICACY DATA.

  5. Are the members of ACIP aware that improving the stability of the Pfizer formulation could INCREASE either the effective dose, or the number of people receiving an effective dose, thereby reducing safety?

  6. Are the members of ACIP aware that FDA did not verify Janssen’s 2nd dose efficacy data or Pfizer’s children’s efficacy data? Did FDA verify Pfizer’s booster data for study 031?

  7. Did ACIP members compare the outcomes for the Pfizer 031 booster study with the original 001 study? In 001 there were 8/18198 and 162/18325 cases in the vaccine and placebo groups respectively compared with 6/4695 and 123/4614 cases in 031. Not accounting for selection and time biases, which could make this even worse, did ACIP members notice that placebo-dosed previous vaccinees fared ~ 3x worse than non-vaccinated in first study, and boosted subjects fared 3.5 times worse than vaccinees after the primary series? This suggests not only waning immunity but some detrimental effect.

  1. Are ACIP members not concerned that Pfizer or Moderna did not present any animal data regarding the toxicology of a third dose?

  2. Why have Pfizer STILL not performed (reported?) cancer, mutagenicity or male infertility studies?

  3. Is ACIP not concerned that CDC continues to recommend vaccination in pregnancy despite the package insert stating: “Available data on COMIRNATY administered to pregnant women are insufficient to inform vaccine-associated risks in pregnancy” and despite the conduct by CDC of studies whose protocol states: there is an urgent need to monitor the safety of these vaccines [..] during or around the time of pregnancy.” Is ACIP not concerned that the study protocols requested a waiver for the requirement to obtain informed consent or parental permission, and that pregnant women, forced to become vaccinated due to mandates, are effectively the subjects of a covert medical experiment?cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/pdf/COVID19-acute-maternal-outcomes-508.pdf

  1. Are ACIP members aware of the October 26 VRBPAC meeting exchange between CDC’s Dr Cohn and FDA’s Dr. Yang in which Dr. Yang revealed that because VAERS is under-reported, FDA used a database (Optum), apparently unknown to CDC. youtu.be/laaL0_xKmmA?t=21807

Does it not concern you that unlike CDC, Pfizer DID know about this database, seen here in this slide from the October 26 VRBPAC meeting? fda.gov/media/153513/download

Slide 32 from Pfizer’s Dr. Gruber (arrows added)

Does it not concern you that this reveals least a 4.8x VAERS underreporting for myocarditis? What does this mean for other AEs? For CDC’s entire assessment of safety?

  1. If ACIP really cared about transparency it would post meeting, docket and agenda details much sooner along with slide presentations.

  2. If ACIP cared about diverse opinions it would invite qualified doctors and scientists to make substantive presentations with full committee discussion, rather than subject us to a lottery and the opportunity to speak for a paltry 3 minutes.

  3. If ACIP REALLY cared about diversity of opinions, it would invite qualified individuals with diverse pinions to be committee members.

  4. Along with CDC’s admission that it does not collect critical information related to naturally acquired immunity https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/cdc-admits-crushing-rights-of-naturally\

and FDA’s shocking request to complete release full details of Pfizer’s studies only after 55 years https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/fda-asks-federal-judge-to-grant-it

the circumstances around today’s ACIP meeting only deepen public mistrust in the ability of FDA and CDC to extricate America from this pandemic.

Texas Doctor on Prominent Houston Area Hospital & Feds: More Like China than America—One Size Fits All

Houston physician Dr. Mary Talley Bowden resigned from Houston Methodist recently resigned from the prominent hospital in America’s fourth most populous city. She conducted a press conference to explain her side of the controversy, eliciting a sharp retort from the hospital’s CEO Marc Boom who alleges the physician is spreading “dangerous misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines and treatments.”   Dr. Talley Bowden started a practice emphasizing unvaccinated patients as she observed discrimination against this demographic at the hospital.  This caught the attention of hospital administration as did the Houston area physician’s social media entries declaring her opposition to draconian national vaccine mandates as well as the potential efficacy of ivermectin.  She was abruptly suspended but then resigned in protest.  The nation’s doctors are in a “David and Goliath” situation with ever growing, more powerful health systems currently incentivized by the U.S. government to firmly align with the dominant COVID-19 public health narrative.

Local media KHOU 11 reported recently that physician Dr. Mary Talley Bowden was suspended by the hospital as apparently, she was going to only treat unvaccinated patients in her practice. She hadn’t even seen a patient yet and the controversy blew wide open to a suspension and then an abrupt resignation.

For example the CEO declared that “Her [Dr. Talley Bowden] claim that Houston Methodist will not treat unvaccinated patients is absolutely false. Houston Methodist cares for all patients and considers every individual a person of sacred worth and value.” Boom also accused Talley Bowden of “vulgar and foul language while expressing her opinions.”

The Doctor Speaks

The ear, nose and throat doctor specialist declared during a press briefing defended herself. She resigned, declaring “it is completely ridiculous.”  Trouble started when she started to focus on unvaccinated patients she claimed they were facing discrimination.

Subscribe to the Trialsitenews "Ivermectin" Channel

No spam - we promise

Her social media posts were a problem for the hospital. While opposing national vaccine mandates while also promising ivermectin in some cases declared “The government…and Methodist Hospital…It’s one size fits all no matter what. And if you voice any concerns, then you are attacked…bullied… and that’s China. That’s not America.”

Call to Action: Physicians should be mindful of what they declare on social media in this environment.

While Northern Europe Halts Use of Moderna on Young People the Company Presses Canada for the Market

TrialSite has reported that all of the nations of Scandinavia, from Denmark and Sweden to Norway, Finland, and Iceland have either temporarily or permanently halted the use of the mRNA-based COVID-19 from Moderna in young people, in some cases, 30 years old and under.  But that isn’t stopping Moderna from a full-court press to secure market access, via approval in Canada by the Cambridge, Massachusetts company’s request to Health Canada to approve mRNA-1273. While Health Canada still reviews the Pfizer-BioNTech application for child immunizations, Moderna now falls in line.

On October 18, Pfizer submitted their request to Health Canada to vaccinate children from age 5 to 11 with a regimen one-third that for adults. Now, with the trade name Comirnaty, Pfizer is first in line followed by what is called Spikevax (mRNA-1273). 

According to Nicole Ireland, writing for CBC News, Moderna proposes using two doses half the size of adult shots. Moderna says its low-dose COVID vaccine generates an immune response in kids | CBC News.

“Health Canada will only authorize the use of Spikevax in children if its independent and thorough scientific review of the data in the submission shows that the benefits of the vaccine outweigh the risks in this age group,” the release said. 

Subscribe to the Trialsitenews "COVID-19" Channel

No spam - we promise

“The assessment will include a detailed review of clinical trial results, as well as other evolving data and information about the health impacts of COVID-19 and variants of concern on children in Canada.”

In an emailed response to a CBC News request for additional information, Health Canada said it could not provide “specific timelines for completion or specific information on the submission until it has received regulatory approval.”

Nordics Say No

As reported by TrialSite, every country in the Nordic region now halts the use of Spikevax on young people. TrialSite includes a timeline:

NationDate Halted/PausedSwedenOct 6 a temporary halt announcedDenmarkOct 6 a temporary halt announcedNorwayOct 22 Holding off on giving 2nd dose of Moderna until more dataFinlandOct 8 suspends vaccine for young men/boysIcelandOct 8 suspends vaccine use

Of course, the moves by these governments to at least temporarily restrict access to young populations benefits Pfizer-BioNTech.

Hijama aka “cupping”: desperate workers, students forced into vaxx mandates turn to ancient treatment to remove the injections after administration

Most people were introduced to the concept of hijama, aka “cupping” in 2016. Michael Phelps is a 23-time Olympic gold medal swimmer. His body was covered with circular bruises when he showed up for the 4×100 freestyle relay event in Rio De Janeiro that summer.

 

The bruises were the result of hijama, known in the United States as “cupping.” The ancient practice was first utilized in Northeast Africa, China and parts of the Middle East. Cupping is mentioned in the oldest medical textbook in the world – Ebers Papyrus – first published in 1,550 B.C.E. Cupping treats sore muscles, migraines, skin diseases, arthritis, menstrual pain, face wrinkles, and much more. It is also believed to improve immune function and lower cholesterol. Many athletes and celebrities, including Jennifer Aniston and Gwyneth Paltrow, swear by the practice.

Phelps receiving cupping treatment in 2015. Photo via Instagram.

The process and the science

Cupping practitioners place round cups made of glass, silicone or bamboo directly on your skin. The suction is created via a pump or through heating the cups to create a natural vacuum. It forces increased blood circulation to the cupped area and stimulates healing, Qi (energy/life force) and other physiological processes. For Muslims, hijama is accompanied by prayers. The process purports to return the body to its normal, natural state.

French professional soccer player Karim Benzema receiving cupping treatment.

Post-treatment bruises heal and disappear withing 10 days.

A 2015 study published in the peer-reviewed scientific journal PLOS One found that cupping relieves neck and lower back pain. But the study concluded that further research is needed to draw definitive conclusions. Another 2015 study published in the Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine found that cupping is effective in treating herpes, acne, paralysis and pain. Those researchers determined that more concrete treatment protocols are necessary to draw definitive conclusions about cupping effectiveness.

Wet cupping and COVID-19 “vaccines”

All of the foregoing refers to dry cupping. But a variation of the technique is the primary subject of this article. Wet cupping uses all the same processes described herein. But the practitioner removes the cups after about three minutes and uses a scalpel to make tiny incisions in that area of the skin. The cups are then reattached and a second suction is done to draw a small amount of blood from the area.

The idea is to remove toxins directly from the body instead of waiting for them to pass via urine, sweat and/or stool. A 2018 study published in the Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies found that wet cupping significantly lowered heavy metal levels in the bodies of young men.

RELATED: Japan suspends use of Moderna injections after “metallic particles” found in vials; country continues using Ivermectin to treat COVID-19 (September 1, 2021)

 

A woman we’ll call Lauren emailed The COVID Blog last week. She is an ER nurse in California. Lauren is also the mother of three children. Her husband received the Moderna mRNA injection in July to keep his municipal job. He developed myocarditis and has not been able to work since mid-August. Thus, Lauren is the sole breadwinner in the family right now.

Lauren obviously does not want her last name revealed because it would jeopardize her job. She saw a video on Telegram (and pointed it to us) demonstrating how a Russian cupping practitioner claimed to remove most or all of the so-called “vaccine” from the injection site within a 30-minute window after the injection. Note, the following video is graphic so don’t watch it if you have a weak stomach.

Lauren received the Johnson & Johnson viral vector DNA injection at a Walmart on September 30. She specifically received J&J because it’s advertised as “one and done.” Lauren prearranged an appointment with a cupping practitioner immediately afterwards. She made certain that the practitioner knew exactly why she was there and the purpose of the cupping treatment. Lauren received the treatment just 15 minutes after the injection.

“So far, I’ve experienced no adverse effects and I get to keep my job,” Lauren said. I asked her if she really thinks the wet cupping technique removed the viral vector DNA material from her arm. “Even if it didn’t, my mind believes it did. I need my job and I didn’t know what else to do. I guess if I die or get sick from the vaccine, at least I tried whatever was in my power to lessen the damage,” she said.

Lauren described her new vaccine card as a “license to work.”

Does wet cupping really remove the “vaccines”?

The most disturbing part of the Russian video is what was actually removed from the patient’s body. Look at how quickly the blood clots after the injection. Again that video was taken within 30 minutes after the shot. Lauren said her practitioner had to make a larger-than-normal incision at her injection site because her blood was not flowing as it should normally do.

What we know for certain is that wet cupping only has a chance to remove the injection if it’s done within 30 minutes thereafter. Otherwise it starts spreading throughout the body. But we’ve read accounts of other individuals doing full-body wet cupping to attempt detoxifying their bodies of the injection toxins.

It is incredibly sad and disturbing that people are forced to go to these types of extremes to preserve their livelihoods. Unfortunately this is the world we live in now. The survival instinct is powerful. We need food, water and shelter to live. The vast majority of humanity needs employment to access those necessities. Many are quitting their jobs to avoid being contaminated. But realistically, most cannot do that. And now, here we are.

Shawn Kuhn: 21-year-old University of Georgia student is latest near-term Pfizer death that mainstream media call “breakthrough” COVID-19 death

ATHENS, GEORGIA — A 21-year-old sports science major and personal trainer is dead, and is now being used by mainstream media as a pawn in their propaganda campaigns.

Mr. Shawn Kuhn received his first Pfizer mRNA injection sometime in April, according to CBS 46 News in Atlanta. He received the second shot in May. Mr. Kuhn caught so-called COVID-19 in December 2020. He suffered only minor symptoms before recovering within days. Thus, he had natural immunity for a disease with a 99.7%+ survival rate for people his age. But he received the injections anyway.

Mr. Kuhn allegedly caught “COVID-19-based pneumonia” towards the end of August. His condition progressively deteriorated through September. Mr. Tim Kuhn, Shawn’s father, said his son was “in and out of three hospitals” for the next six weeks. He said Shawn was “losing blood” every day, but doctors had no explanation as to how or where he was losing the blood.

Tim posted a Facebook update on October 10. His son was in the intensive care unit, in a medically-induced coma, and on a ventilator. Note that once a ventilator is utilized, the chances of survival decrease significantly. Shawn was to be transferred to Emory Hospital in Atlanta via Life Flight in the forthcoming days. But he did not survive the night.

Shawn passed away at 2:59 a.m., October 11.

Shawn’s sister, Sharla, also wrote about him on Facebook that day.

The aftermath

The CBS 46 story is essentially a CDC production. The doctor they rented for the story, Robin Dretler, essentially said that 15 million people have to die from “vaccines” and/or COVID for everyone else to reap the benefits of the agenda. Watch the full story below.

Here’s what we know for certain. Mr. Shawn Kuhn appears to be one of those skinny high school kids who got into lifting weights in college (note: I was one of those kids). He was 21 years old and in excellent physical shape. The CDC found this past March that nearly 80% of hospitalized COVID-19 victims in 2020 were overweight or obese. But mainstream media want you to believe that this young, healthy man who caught COVID-19 months prior and already had natural immunity, died from COVID-19 as a “breakthrough” case. Regardless, that is how his death is recorded.

Mr. Kuhn graduated with honors from Perry (GA) High School in 2018. He was a senior, Dean’s List student at the University of Georgia at the time of his death. He was also a Team Leader at Chick Fil-A. The Shawn Kuhn Memorial Scholarship Fund is accepting contributions. Checks and money orders can be sent to:

Perry High School
1307 North Avenue
Perry, GA 31069

Funeral services are scheduled for Saturday, October 16 at Cross Point Baptist Church in Perry, Georgia.

Another near-term Antibody Dependent Enhancement death

Mainstream media and big pharma must continue their propaganda campaigns to keep this COVID-19 charade going strong. Anyone with a shred of common sense knows Mr. Kuhn did not die from COVID-19. He died from antibody dependent enhancement (ADE). In a nutshell, his immune attacked healthy cells in his body that it recognized as SARS-CoV-2 or some related coronavirus that looks or acts similar.

The good Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi explains it best.

Unfortunately everyone who receives the real mRNA injections, and not a placebo, will succumb to ADE within a year or two max. Of course they could also develop cancer within that time frame, or die from heart failure due to blood clots. We now know that these shots have bio-mechanical properties. You are essentially being injected with liquid computer operating systems that take over your genes.

We’re going to see many more so-called “breakthrough” deaths like this because they are really “vaccine” deaths. And no matter how many of these happen, even with the breakthrough propaganda spin, vaxx zealots still won’t acknowledge that these injections neither stop the spread of so-called COVID-19, nor mitigates the symptoms. The shots are for obedience and control. Nothing more. Nothing less.

NBA Update: Andrew Wiggins caves to social pressure, Brandon Goodwin suffers post-injection blood clots, while Kyrie Irving, et al. stand their ground

NEW YORK — The NBA is the epitome of this new clown world in the COVID-19 era. But several heroes and a few goats (the bad kind) are being created in the process.

First, let’s outline the NBA’s “vaccine” and COVID-19 protocols. Non-vaccinated players are not allowed to eat with their teams, go to team functions, or be in same locker room as their teammates. But come game time, they can be on the court, maskless, with their teammates and opponents, fighting for rebounds, diving for loose balls and sweating everywhere.

NBA players are not “required” to receive the injections. But we all know how the social pressure and media coercion work. Non-vaccinated players are also not allowed to leave their homes or hotels on the road. Keep in mind this blogger is a former sports reporter, and old enough to remember when the NBA allowed Magic Johnson to play basketball with full-blown AIDS.

Despite the “non-mandate,” at least 95% of NBA players have received the injections, according to the league. So of course those 5% non-vaccinated are the big news stories.

Jonathan Isaac – Orlando Magic forward: standing strong

Note that Rolling Stone magazine is a joke publication with no credibility. That said, Rolling Stone wrote a hit-piece on Mr. Isaac claiming he was a Donald Trump fan and a bunch of other nonsense. Mr. Isaac, a 6’11 forward, has made clear that he will not receive the injections for many reason, but mostly because he’s had COVID-19 and thus has natural immunity. A reporter asked him about the Rolling Stone article during the team’s media session in late September. Mr. Isaac’s response went viral.

Mr. Isaac has always been his own man. He made headlines in 2020 because he was the lone Magic player not to kneel during the National Anthem. Mr. Isaac will only miss a handful of games due to vaxx mandates in New York and California. Florida essentially outlaws all vaccine mandates, so he’ll play all Magic home games.

Bradley Beal – Washington Wizards shooting guard: standing strong

Mr. Beal is a bonafide scorer and 3-time NBA All-Star. It’s frankly sad that reporters posed at least four questions about “vaccination status” during the team’s media day on September 28 instead of asking about basketball. But he handled it like a champ, and likely forced a few reporters to go home and do some research for themselves. Mr. Beal, a 6’3 guard, turned the tables and asked reporters a question of his own:

“People with vaccines, why are you still getting COVID? It doesn’t eliminate anyone from getting COVID.”

Washington, D.C. has no vaxx mandates so he can play all home games. Of course he’ll miss games in California and New York. NBA players will not be paid for games missed due to vaxx mandates. Further, the Wizards will sink or swim with Mr. Beal. He is by far the best player on their roster. Thus they cannot and will not just “sit him out.” That’s the luxury of being an indispensable employees for a large corporation.

Andrew Wiggins – Golden State Warriors: caved to the pressure

This one is sad and disappointing. Both New York City and San Francisco (where the Warriors play) have municipal vaxx mandates. Everyone entering a “large-scale event” must show proof of vaccination in San Francisco. Mr. Wiggins submitted his request for a religious exemption to the NBA, but it was denied. It’s unclear why Mr. Wiggins did not challenge the denial in federal court, like the Western Michigan University athletes and New York healthcare workers.

Mr. Wiggins knows very well the dangers of these injections. He’s done the research. Mr. Wiggins was coy about answering questions regarding his “vaccination status” at the team’s media day late last month. But everyone knew he was non-vaxxed. Unfortunately he made a decision based on money. Mr. Wiggins has already made nearly $80 million in salary alone in his NBA career. He’s likely made several million more in endorsements. His press conference announcing he received the Johnson & Johnson viral vector DNA shot was very similar to stories of regular people covered on this blog. He only received the shot after coercion and facing the job or jab decision.

Mr. Wiggins said he hopes in 10 years, he’s still healthy, knowing the damage these injections do to humans. Mr. Wiggins also made clear that it’s “not something I wanted to do” and that apparently he “doesn’t own his body.” The solemn press conference culminated with a dejected Mr. Wiggins conceding that he sacrificed himself for his children and family.

“It’s not really something we believe in as a family. They know that I had to. It came down to get the vaccination or don’t play basketball. I’m 26. I have two kids. I want more kids. I’m trying to do something that will generate as much money as I can for my kids and my future kids, [create] generational wealth. So, I took the gamble, took the risk, and hopefully, I’m good.”

Mr. Wiggins reported body aches and chills after receiving the injection.

Brandon Goodwin – New York Knicks point guard: post-injection blood clots

Note that the former Atlanta Hawks point guard signed with the New York Knicks yesterday. But while a member of the Atlanta Hawks, the team made a magical run to the Eastern Conference Finals this past season. Noticeably absent was their backup point guard, Mr. Goodwin. The Hawks announced he would miss the playoffs due to a “minor respiratory illness.” But there’s always two sides to every story.

Mr. Goodwin revealed on a Twitch stream that, “the vaccine ended my season [last year]. One thousand percent.” But he wasn’t finished:

“I got sick and I never quite recovered from it (after the injection). I would always have back pain, I was just super tired in the games. Bro, I was so tired. I felt like I couldn’t run up and down the court. My back was hurting. My back really started hurting bad. Then, I’m like, OK. I need to go to the doctor. That’s when I found out I had (two) blood clots. That all within the span of a month. I was fine until then. I was fine up until I took the vaccine, I was fine.”

The worst part is yet to come. The Atlanta Hawks told Mr. Goodwin not to talk to media or anyone else about his condition, particularly the blood clots and prescribed blood thinners. The real reason for his playoff absence is because you cannot do rigorous activities while on blood thinners. Watch the full Twitch stream here.

Kyrie Irving – Brooklyn Nets guard: focal point of non-vaxxed NBA

Non-basketball fans have heard the name Kyrie Irving. He’s the biggest star of all the foregoing players, and thus the primary target of all the corporate talking heads in sports media. The Brooklyn Nets announced this week that Kyrie Irving won’t be allowed to play or practice with the team because he refuses to receive mRNA or viral vector DNA injections. That means he won’t get paid his $33.4 million salary in 2021-22. Mr. Irving doesn’t care.

He’s made well over $130 million in salary alone in his NBA career. Mr. Irving, conservatively, has made another $100 million during his 10 years in the NBA from endorsements and other projects. Money does not control this man. Granted he’s a little quirky and a lot brash. But the NBA and mainstream media billionaires are realizing that their money cannot control Mr. Irving. And it is making them mad as hell.

Just listen to Shannon Sharpe (who this blogger used to have the upmost respect for until 2021). He and Skip Bayless are unabashed vaxx zealots who are incapable of thinking outside their scripted talking points. It has nothing to do with “Flat Earth” or “selfishness.” Mr. Irving does not want to poison himself, period.

And the list goes on with these talking heads. That Stephen A. Smith clown is even worse. None of these people have principles. They are all bought-and-paid-for talking heads. They will never understand Mr. Irving not only because all of them are under the influence of synthetic mRNA and viral vector DNA, but also because they make decisions based on money. Mr. Irving is his own man and own company. Shannon Sharpe, Stephen A. Smith, etc. are just following orders from their bosses, period.


Depopulation Agenda: Planned Parenthood’s documented blueprint for destroying humanity comes to fruition over last 50 years, culminating with COVID-19

The provisional number of births in the U.S. was 3,605,201 in 2020. That is the lowest number of births in the United States since 1979, according to the Centers for Disease Control. 2020 also had the lowest fertility rate since the government started tracking births in 1902. And don’t blame the so-called “pandemic.” Birth rates have been steadily declining since 2007, when 4.3 million babies were born in the United States. Total fertility rates have been below replacement – meaning the number of births necessary for a generation to replace itself – since 1971.

Google searches for the term “depopulation” reached peak popularity in April 2020. The term “population control” reached its peak Google popularity in March 2020. Granted we’re learning in 2021 that intelligent people succumb to government psy-ops. But critical thinkers understood immediately that something was very wrong with all the COVID-19 stuff. Plus many among the global elite continually and openly gloat about their desire to cull the masses.

RELATED: Bill Gates is the second-largest funder of the World Health Organization (June 23, 2021)

Bill Gates isn’t even coy about his desires. Despite mainstream media saying his words were taken out of context or he misspoke or something, Gates said at a TED Talks that new vaccines can lower the population “by 10 to 15%.”

Former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger is quoted (via a third party) in the book The Final Days saying, “military men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy.” Kissinger also implied that population control in poor countries should be a priority since “rich” countries need the resources from those places. That quote has been sensationalized over the years. But the real quote comes from National Security Study Memorandum (NSSM) 200, dated December 10, 1974.

Whatever may be done to guard against interruptions of supply and to develop domestic alternatives, the U.S. economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries. That fact gives the U.S. enhanced interest in the political, economic, and social stability of the supplying countries. Wherever a lessening of population pressures through reduced birth rates can increase the prospects for such stability, population policy becomes relevant to resource supplies and to the economic interests  of the United States.

Kissinger’s “useless eaters” quote also cannot be verified. But if you know Kissinger, you know it’s not out of the question.

RELATED: British Medical Journal: “Why have so many African leaders died of COVID-19?” (July 21, 2021)

Billionaires can only buy so much with their money. There are only so many toys and travel destinations in the world. Power is the ultimate goal for these types. They yearn control, the power to administer every move, every thought, and every goal of humanity. The World Economic Forum (WEF), founded and run by Klaus Schwab, made clear that by 2030, humanity will “own nothing and be happy.”

All the usual suspects (Facebook, Google, Bill Gates, PayPal, etc.) are listed as partners of the WEF, along with Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Moderna.

The United States officially launched its depopulation blueprint in 1969. It has come to nearly 90% fruition in 2021 after hitting some roadblocks in the 1980s. But the talks about depopulation among those in power commenced in the 1930s and progressed from there. Keep these stats in mind as you read this article. They will be repeated throughout:

  • The average American adult woman (up to age 35) had 3.58 kids in 1960 (Baby Boomers).

  • 76% of black American babies were born to married mom and dad in 1965.

  • 97% of white babies were born to married mom and dad in 1965

  • 72% of all American adults were married in 1960.

The depopulation agenda is deliberate and documented. This article chronicles the depopulation journey from 1916 to today.

1916-1942: The race-based beginnings of U.S. population control

Planned Parenthood and its founder, Margaret Sanger, are the progenitors of all modern population control agendas in the United States. It’s important to note that Planned Parenthood receives a vast majority of its funding from the federal government, thus is essentially a government organization. The first “birth control clinic” opened on October 16, 1916 in the Brownsville section of Brooklyn, New York. One website described Brownsville, at that time, as “a down-trodden part of New York City where the ‘inferior races’ and ‘human weeds’ lived; immigrant southern Europeans, Slavs, Latins and Jews.” Today Brownsville is predominately Black.

Sanger began publishing the magazine Birth Control Review in 1917. Though Sanger was always careful about the language she used in public speeches, her eugenics goals were blatant and obvious. The July 1922 issue of Birth Control Review, stated the following as a founding goal:

“Sterilization of the insane and feeble-minded and the encouragement of this operation upon those afflicted with inherited or transmissible diseases, with the understanding that sterilization does not deprive the individual of his or her sex expression, but merely renders him incapable of producing children.”

Sanger founded The American Birth Control League in 1921, according to the Encyclopedia of Women’s History in America. It’s mission statement not only reiterated Sanger’s goal of eugenics, but racially-targeted eugenics.

THE AMERICAN BIRTH CONTROL LEAGUE. Its Aim: To promote eugenic birth selection throughout the United States so that there may be more well‑born and fewer ill‑born children ― a stronger, healthier, more intelligent race … and in order that those who are physically and mentally unsound may use birth control to have fewer or no children” Birth Control Review, Volume XVI, Number 12 (December 1932), page 319.

Sanger launched her “Negro Project” in 1939. You can read more about that here. But essentially the goal was to stop Black babies from being born at all in the United States. The American Birth Control League changed its name to the Planned Parenthood Federation of America in 1942.

1942-1969: Planned Parenthood hastens destruction of nuclear family

Sanger continued expanding Planned Parenthood and connecting with eugenicists globally and domestically. She established the International Planned Parenthood Federation in 1952. The organization won several victories in courts and on administrative levels in the 1950s and 1960s. The Food and Drug Administration approved the first birth control pill – Enovid-10 – on May 9, 1960. The U.S. Supreme Court struck down all bans on birth control pills for married couples in the 1965 case Griswold vs. Connecticut. Sanger died one year after the decision. But the organization was left in “good” hands. More on that shortly.

Daniel Patrick Moynihan was the Assistant Secretary of Labor for Presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson. He was also a U.S. Senator for New York from 1977 to 2001. Moynihan and his staff published a report entitled, “The Negro Family: The Case for National Action” in March 1965. He pointed out many reasons for inequality between Blacks and Whites, particularly “the racist virus in the American blood stream still afflicts us: Negroes will encounter serious personal prejudice for at least another generation. Second, three centuries of sometimes unimaginable mistreatment have taken their toll on the Negro people.”

But Moynihan’s main point throughout the document was clear – Black Americans cannot prosper as long as the family structure continues deteriorating. He pointed out how much of the American Black family paradigm carried over from slavery days, meaning Black men jumping around impregnating multiple women (to create more slaves for their White masters), fear of the family being torn apart via trafficking (slave sales), rape by masters, castrations, etc.

Black families thrived in 1950s and early 1960s

Despite all the hurdles, nearly 85% of black babies were born to a married mom and dad in 1950. Granted that’s much less than the 98% of white babies born to married mom and dad in 1950. But that’s as even as it ever was in post-Antebellum U.S. history. Meanwhile there were less than 150,000 Black Americans in prison or jail in 1950 (of course the “war on drugs” greatly contributed to that number being 10-times higher in 2021). Black-owned businesses thrived through the early 1960s and were pillars of stability in Black communities. Here, we repeat the statistics from the beginning of the article.

  • The average American adult woman (up to age 35) had 3.58 kids in 1960.

  • 76% of black American babies were born to married mom and dad in 1965.

  • 97% of white babies were born to married mom and dad in 1965

  • 72% of all Americans were married in 1960.

Out-of-wedlock Black births rose from about 15% in 1950 to 24% in 1965. Black-owned businesses closed at a rapid pace after the Civil Rights Act of 1964 officially ended segregation. Thus Black-owned businesses were no longer “necessary.” Black customers were now more inclined to patronize the White-owned business that they formerly could not go to. In fact many Black intellectuals who grew up during those times blamed integration not only on the fall of the Black family, but also Black infrastructure, meaning businesses.

The damage was done to Black Americans. The situation continually worsened until it reached abyss levels in 2021. But eugenicists weren’t satisfied. They now had the blueprint to population control and manipulation – destroy the nuclear family. White families had been unaffected by all of the happenings of the 1960s. A new strategy was necessary, as the same tactics used to hasten Black family self-destruction wouldn’t work on white families.

Birth control pills were mainstream among white women by the late 1960s. That alone slowed births quite a bit. But Planned Parenthood and its partners had loftier goals for global population control.

1969: the official start to modern global depopulation

Mainstream media “fact-checkers” (e.g. Snopes and Politifact) say that Bill Gates, Sr. never worked for Planned Parenthood and dismiss the whole idea as “conspiracy theory.” Planned Parenthood websites have scrubbed all remnants of Gates Sr. working for them. Unfortunately for mainstream media, Bill Jr. spilled the beans in a May 9, 2003 PBS interview. Like eugenicist father, like eugenicist son. Gates Jr. told Bill Moyers:

When I was growing up, my parents were always involved in various volunteer things. My dad was head of Planned Parenthood. And it was very controversial to be involved with that. And so it’s fascinating. At the dinner table my parents are very good at sharing the things that they were doing. And almost treating us like adults, talking about that.

The full PBS transcript is here. Bill Gates Jr. was born in 1955. Thus he was “growing up” in the 1960s and early 1970s. That is the time frame that Gates, Sr. headed Planned Parenthood, likely after Sanger died. His visions extended far beyond Sanger’s black genocide goals. The organization and its partners forged ahead with its new, larger visions.

The Jaffe Memo

Frederick S. Jaffe was the Vice President of Planned Parenthood in 1969. He was also Executive Director of Planned Parenthood’s Center for Family Planning Program Development. He wrote a memorandum in response to a request from Bernard Berelson, who at the time was President of the Rockefeller-founded Population Council. The March 11, 1969 letter became known as the Jaffe Memo.

The 9-page document is a fascinating read into the minds of eugenicists and depopulation advocates. But it is page 9 that is essentially the blueprint for everything that has happened since 1969 related to American families, social norms, sexuality and depopulation. A table outlines “Proposed Measures to Reduce Fertility by universality or Selectivity of Impact in the U.S.”

The full document is here if the screenshot is hard to read. The left-hand column outlines Universal Impact measures for Social Constraints.

  • Restructure family – alter image of ideal family and avoid/postpone marriage

  • Compulsory [public] education for children

  • Encourage increased homosexuality

  • Fertility control agents in water supply

  • Encourage women to work

Payments to encourage self-sterilization, contraception and abortions are also proposed in the document. It also discourages private home ownership.

Planned Parenthood’s Center for Family Planning Program Development broke away from the organization in 1974 and became the non-profit subsidiary Guttmacher Institute. It was named after Dr. Alan Guttmacher, an OB-GYN and former Vice President of the American Eugenics Society (now called the Society for Biodemography and Social Biology). The Guttmacher Institute officially split from Planned Parenthood in 2007. Jaffe headed the Guttmacher Institute until his death in 1978.

Of course mainstream media “fact-checkers” have done amazing word gymnastics trying to discredit the Jaffe Memo as “conspiracy theory.” But again, read it for yourself and continue reading this article.

Legal abortions and executing the homosexual agenda

Planned Parenthood and the Population Council were and are very influential. They also have bottomless government funds. The organizations immediately went to work executing the Jaffe Memo in real-life.

The homosexual agenda is necessary to destroy nuclear families, destroy the natural, common sense fact of man and woman; and cull overall birth numbers. Obviously homosexual “couples” cannot procreate without weird science. The more homosexuality, the less procreation.

Coincidentally or otherwise, three months after the Jaffe Memo, the so-called “Stonewall Riots” occurred in New York. An Italian Mafia-owned bar in Greenwich Village that catered to homosexuals, was raided by police on June 28, 1969.  The mainstream story is that the bar was raided because homosexuals were in there. The whole narrative, particularly the “who threw the first brick” thing, is now disseminated in memes, as much of the story is exaggerated and fabricated, like all 21st century “LGBT” narratives. Stonewall was orchestrated to create the modern “LGBT” movement.

We’ll get back to homosexual culture and its importance to the overall depopulation agenda shortly.

Abortion and Planned Parenthood victories in 1970s

The Family Planning Services and Public Research Act was signed into law by President Richard Nixon in 1970. Known more broadly as Title X, the bill guarantees federal funding “dedicated to providing individuals with comprehensive family planning and related preventive health services.” Since 2010, the Title X program received about $300 million in taxpayer funds per year, every year.

New York was the first state to legalize abortion in 1970. Planned Parenthood opened its first legal abortion clinic in Syracuse, New York that year. But federal law still prohibited the practice. The U.S. Supreme Court broadened its ruling in the aforementioned Griswold case in 1972. The Court, in Eisenstadt vs. Baird, extended legal contraception to unmarried couples as well – essentially everyone. Back-alley, illegal abortion clinics operated in many cities in the 1960s. Of course Roe vs. Wade was decided in 1973, legalizing abortions in all 50 states.

Normalizing homosexuality

Abortion and birth control were now fully legal across the U.S., just three years after the Jaffe Memo. Now it was time to fully implement homosexual culture as legal, protected and sacred. The American Psychiatric Association updated its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-II) in 1973. It changed homosexuality from a mental disorder to a “sexual orientation disturbance” and a “normal sexual variant.” The International Gay Association (now ILGA) was founded in 1978. Homosexual culture was well on its way to becoming a protected, mainstream class of people as it was integral in the overall population control agenda.

Mainstream powers tried equating disco music with homosexual culture to disseminate the lifestyle as normal. Of course a vast majority of disco acts were Black Americans who weren’t homosexual. But most disco acts simply did not care who their fans were because they were making hundreds of thousands, and even millions of dollars, during the disco era. This blogger did a college podcast on the negativity of hip-hop in 2006. It also touched on disco in the 1970s. You may listen to it here.

White liberals fueled the homosexual-disco narrative. Disco Demolition Night essentially ended the disco era and the momentary homosexual mainstreaming in 1979. It was more a backlash against homosexual culture, and not necessarily the music. Hollywood also wasn’t cooperating with the homosexual agenda, for whatever reason.

80’s backlash to homosexuality, while women work

National and global psy-ops need a coordinated mainstream media to work. Television shows and movies in the 1970s and 1980s depicted women as workers and career people. Whereas June Cleaver and Donna Reed were to the 1960s, Mary Tyler Moore and Ann Romano (One Day At A Time) were to the 1970s. The movie “9 to 5,” released in December 1980, was still the 20th-highest grossing comedy in history as of 2005. Dolly Parton, Jane Fonda and Lily Tomlin all played working women in corporate America.

The agenda was working, in that women now worked just as much as men. And it had the desired effect. Fertility rates were slashed in half in a matter of 20 years. The average American woman had 3.58 kids in 1960. That number dropped to 1.77 kids by 1979. Out-of-wedlock births spiked dramatically among Black Americans, from about 20% in 1960 to 55% in 1980. But most importantly to the eugenicists, the plan was working, albeit more slowly, for White Americans too. Out-of-wedlock white births rose from 3% in 1960 to about 12% in 1980.

Women were officially workers first, instead of mothers and wives. Most women – 60% – used birth control pills or some other contraception by 1988. But the homosexual agenda hit an unexpected snag. Those who grew up in the 1980s know that the words “faggot,” “fairy” and “homo” were commonplace in popular 80s movies.

Further, homosexual culture was still too taboo for even Hollywood. Perhaps the two most popular homosexual characters of the 1980s – Lamar in “Revenge of the Nerds” and Hollywood in “Mannequin” – were both Black. Just like Black people were the first to die in 80s horror movies, they were mostly the only homosexual characters in movies.

Hollywood (the city, not the character) also was not fully cooperating as it related to breaking up the nuclear family. The Cosby Show depicted a successful, well-off nuclear Black family. Family Matters and The Fresh Prince of Bel-Aire did the same in the late 80s and early 1990s. Growing Pains and Family Ties depicted stable, nuclear white families. Even Al Bundy, from Married…With Children, would never cheat on his wife, Peggy.

Other than the establishment of new, independent movie studios in the 1990s (e.g. Miramax, Lions Gate, and New Line), it’s unclear what happened in Hollywood to change from anti-homosexual and pro-family, to the direction it swayed in the late 1990s. The watershed moment came in 1997 when Ellen DeGeneres “came out as gay” on her eponymous television series. The terms “LGBT” and “GLBT” first appeared in English-language books and newspapers around 1995. Internet also became mainstream in the late 1990s, making messaging more coordinated and streamlined.

Surveillance state, childhood vaccines, water supplies and homosexual protected class

September 11, 2001 was a litmus test. It determined gullibility and acquiescence levels in Americans. Everyone watched three controlled demolitions of skyscrapers that day. But the “19 Muslims with box cutters” narrative caught on and remains the official government story today.

The strategy was now clear – scare Americans into cooperation, even if they know you’re lying to them. Americans at-large were scared after 9/11 and would do anything government and media told them to do for “safety.” The Patriot Act got Americans accustomed to giving up their rights. Surveillance became the norm in a matter of 2-3 years. That same strategy would be used 20 years later for an even more sinister agenda. More on that in a bit.

More vaccines for kids

When this blogger was a child, he remembers receiving one vaccine – the MMR. There may have been one more for tetanus, but can’t really remember.

Vaccine schedules for children continually expanded in the 2000s. Today most children born after the year 2000 get 16 injections before age 12, plus annual flu shots. Autism was present in 1 in 150 children in 2000, according to the CDC. By the end of the decade (2010), it was 1 in 68. In 2016, it was 1 in 54 kids. Mainstream media say that any relationship between vaccines and autism is “conspiracy theory.” Autistic adults rarely have children, essentially eliminating this entire group from procreation.

Contaminating the water supply

The Jaffe Memo also mentioned “fertility control agents in the water supply.” Dr. Tyrone Hayes and his studies on the ubiquitous herbicide atrazine, manufactured by Syngenta, became a lightning rod issue in the 2000s. Dr. Hayes found that male frogs exposed to atrazine not only exhibited homosexual behavior, but also biologically morphed into female frogs.

Atrazine is the most commonly-detected pesticide in U.S. ground water, according to The National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Project. Dr. Hayes’ research was groundbreaking. But unfortunately Alex Jones turned it into a meme about “gay frogs.” Jones covered and editorialized Dr. Hayes’ research, but failed to interview Dr. Hayes or even attribute the research to him. Thus everyone believed it was just Jones spouting this off since he never cited the source.

A 2007 study published in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism found that testosterone levels in American men have declined by 1% every year since the late 1980s. In other words, a 40-year-old man in 2021 has testosterone levels 30% lower than a 40-year-old man in 1991. A presentation by Yale researchers at the 2020 American Urological Association Virtual Experience outlined how testosterone deficiency has a prevalence upwards of 40% in American men. Less testosterone means less sexual desire and lower sperm counts, thus, less procreation.

Victories for the homosexual depopulation agenda

Meanwhile, the homosexual agenda had yet another watershed moment in the late 2000s. Miss California, Carrie Prejean, likely lost a beauty pageant because she had the audacity to say marriage is a union between a man and a woman in April 2009. A homosexual man asked her about homosexual marriage during the pageant. Ms. Prejean was the first public person ever “cancelled” for refusing to regurgitate LGBT propaganda.

Homosexual culture, aka non-procreative culture, was now mainstream, protected and reinforced by media, public schools and government. The Jaffe Memo also proposed compulsory education for kids. California public schools…well, see for yourself.

COVID-19 vaccines – voluntary sterilization and death

The depopulation agenda, in accordance with the Jaffe blueprint, is essentially a mission accomplished by 2019. Birth rates continually plummeted to their current all-time lows. The nuclear family is nearing extinction. Nearly 40% of all American babies were born to a single mom in 2018, according to the CDC. That’s up from 12% in 1980. About 70% of black babies were born to single moms in 2018. And 30% of white babies were born to single moms in 2018, up from 3% in 1960 and 12% in 1980. Birth control and abortion are normalized. Men are now called women (“trans”). Those who fail to play along with these word games are cancelled “bigots.”

COVID-19 is the final chapter in the depopulation agenda for both the United States and world. The Jaffe blueprint spoke of voluntarily sterilization. But 9/11 provided a further framework to execute the plan. If you scare Americans they become more obedient. “Terrorists” and “Muslims” were the boogeymen in 2001. An invisible, allegedly deadly, arbitrary virus took that role in 2020. The United States completely shut down in March 2020. The very popular NCAA basketball tournament was cancelled, the NBA season was postponed, and everyone was told to stay home for their own safety. It was all completely unprecedented and spooked the populace.

Scared into obedience

The messaging was clear – if you catch COVID-19, you will die. The vast majority of Americans believe this narrative despite readily-available CDC data showing a 99%+ survival rate for everyone under age 70. People wore/wear masks religiously despite readily-available data showing positive correlations between mask mandates and rising COVID-19 cases. The 2021 “vaccine” agenda was set up well by 2020.

If you believe the statistics, 57% of Americans are “fully vaccinated” as of October 13. We know for a fact that these injections cause spontaneous abortions and still births. We know that the mRNA and viral vector DNA injections pass from mother to baby during breastfeeding. There’s also data showing that these injections inhibit placenta development, thus rendering women infertile. But these things only happen if you survive.

The injections do not stop the spread of so-called COVID-19. That is a fact. The only proven purposes of these injections are obedience and depopulation.

Looking ahead to 2022

Let’s recap. The 1969 Jaffe Memo appears to be the blueprint for everything happening in 2021. Fertility rates are at all-time lows in 2020. Nuclear family is nearly extinct in the United States. In 1949, 79% of U.S. households had a married couple. Today, that number is 48%. Groundwater is contaminated with gender-bending chemicals. Homosexual culture (“LGBT”) is now the most protected, sacred people in America because they are not procreating. This agenda also ensures that the nuclear family continues its path to extinction.

Comedian Dave Chappelle spotlighted these phenomena in his latest Netflix special.

And Chappelle’s theory played out in real life just days later. Former Las Vegas Raiders (NFL) coach John Gruden was fired from his post this week. But here’s the funny part. He made disparaging remarks about the Black head of the NFL Players Association back in 2011 (said something about big lips). That did not get him fired. It wasn’t until a day or two later when more emails were released, showing Gruden making anti-homosexual remarks during that same time period. Then he was fired.

But do the powers-that-be really care about LGBT? The group is by far the most obedient and most easily manipulated since their entire existences are predicated on smoke and mirrors. An August survey by a pro-LGBT organization found that 92% of Americans who identify as LGBT have received one of the mRNA or viral vector DNA injections. Thus they are the most likely “group” to line up for the shots. It’s an interesting phenomenon since this group is needed for depopulation agendas to work. Yet they are being vaxxed at a much higher rate than any other so-called groups, thus are “self-deleting” more than any other group.

We know for certain that the world will look very different by the end of 2022. What that means exactly is anyone’s guess. The non-vaxxed will come out of this as the only pure humans left on Earth. GMO humans will be the majority, at least in the Western world. But they will also be sick and dying much younger than they should. Are there going to be piles of bodies? Will anyone ever be held accountable? This is The Great Reset. This is the New World Order. We are living the final days of what used to be humanity, and entering this new era. Cling to like-minded people.