Peter Doshi Raises Questions about Vaccine Mandates at Senator Johnson Hearing

Peter Doshi, Ph. D. an associate professor of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, spoke out against vaccine mandates during a five-minute testimony he gave at a panel held by Senator Ron Johnson R-WIS., chair of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, on Capitol Hill last week. 

Doshi is a senior editor at The BMJ and is on the News & Views team. Based in Baltimore, his research focuses on the drug approval process, how the risks and benefits of medical products are assessed and communicated, and improving the credibility and accuracy of evidence synthesis and biomedical publications. 

He campaigns for greater transparency of clinical trial data and leads the Restoring Invisible and Abandoned Trials (RIAT) initiative to ensure clinical trial publications are accurate, complete, and publicly available data. Doshi also has strong interests in journalism to encourage better practice and improve the research enterprise. 

He completed a fellowship in comparative effectiveness research at Johns Hopkins. He received his Ph.D. in history, anthropology, science, technology, and society from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Subscribe to the Trialsitenews "COVID-19" Channel

No spam - we promise

According to Doshi, clinical trials of the vaccine by Pfizer and Moderna did not show a reduction in death even for Covid deaths as opposed to other causes. He called the evidence flimsy, with just two deaths in the placebo group versus one in the vaccine group. 

“My point is not that I know the truth about what the vaccine can and cannot do; my point is that those who claimed the trials showed the vaccines were highly effective in saving lives were wrong. The trials did not demonstrate this,” he said.  

Everybody knows that covid vaccines save lives; in fact, we’ve known this early since 2021. The clinical trials proved that to be the case, as you can see here in the quote of a February article in the Journal of American Medical Association, referring to a slide quoting Walenski, Walke, and Fauci. 

But is it true when that statement by prominent public officials was penned, there had been just one death across the 70,000 Pfizer and Moderna trial participants, he asked?

His slides provided links to articles on the trials that he referred to. Moderna. page 68 (Table S.26) of supplemental file and Pfizer. page 12 (Table S.4) supplemental file. 

He continued by stating the definition of anti-vaxxer according to the Miriam Webster dictionary: a person who opposes the use of vaccines or regulations mandating vaccinations. “I would wager that a majority of the world’s population meets the definition here of an anti-vaxxer,” he added.

The mRNA products are qualitatively different than standard vaccines, he said. He stated, “And so, I found it fascinating to learn that Miriam Webster changed its definition of vaccine early in the year. The mRNA products did not meet the definition of vaccine that has been in place for 15 years at Miriam Webster. The definition was expanded so that now mRNA products are vaccines.”

“I highlight this to ask the question, how would you feel about mandating covid vaccines if we didn’t call them vaccines. What if these injections were called drugs instead?” he asked.

“So, here’s the scenario; we have this drug, and we have evidence that it doesn’t prevent infection, nor does it stop viral transmission. But the drug is understood to reduce your risk of becoming very sick and dying of covid. Would you take a dose of this drug every six months for possibly the rest of your life? If that’s what it took for the drug to stay effective? Would you not just take this drug yourself but support regulations mandating that everyone else around you take this drug? Or would you say, hold on a sec. Maybe you would say if that’s all the drug does, why not use a normal medicine instead. The kind we take when we are sick and want to get better? And why would you mandate it?”

Doshi concluded by saying, “the point is just because we call it a vaccine doesn’t mean we should assume these new products are just like all other childhood vaccines which get mandated. Each product is different. If people are okay with mandating something simply because it’s a vaccine and we mandate other vaccines, why shouldn’t we mandate this?” 

“I think it’s time to inject some critical thinking into that conversation, and that is what I hope we’re doing today,” he said, ending his testimony.

News Roundup | COVID-19 Infection Rate Skyrockets in America’s Most Vaccinated State: Vermont

Story 1 | COVID-19 Infection Rate Skyrockets in America’s Most Vaccinated State: Vermont
Becker’s Healthcare, a prominent health system-focused online media reported today that Vermont is the most vaccinated state in the nation. Nearly 72% of the entire population of about 630,000 are fully vaccinated. Yet new cases of SARS-CoV-2 skyrocket, including deaths. What is going on? Why does TrialSite continue to see in the most heavily vaccinated nations and several states in the United States inordinately high rates of infection? TrialSite reports a trend observed across America and the world where the most vaccinated populations experienced acceleration in infections, including breakthrough Sars-CoV-2 cases.
Link | https://trialsitenews.com/covid-19-infection-rate-skyrockets-in-americas-most-vaccination-state-vermont/

Story 2 | The NIH to Debate Vaccine Mandates
There’s an interesting debate happening over vaccine mandates, and it’s in an unlikely place. The National Institute of Health, the workplace of Dr. Anthony Fauci, who is a mandate advocate. According to a November 7th article in The Wall Street Journal, the NIH will hold a “round-table session” on December 1st to discuss the “ethics” of the proposed workplace mandate.
Link | https://trialsitenews.com/the-nih-to-debate-vaccine-mandates/

Bioethics of Experimental COVID Vaccine Deployment under EUA: It’s time we stop and look at what’s going down.

Robert W Malone, MD, MS1

I provide this brief essay for the TrialSite community because you are involved or at least interested in human subject clinical research. By way of background, please understand that I am a vaccine specialist and advocate, as well as the original inventor of the mRNA vaccine (and DNA vaccine) core platform technology. But I also have extensive training in bioethics from the University of Maryland, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, and Harvard Medical School, and advanced clinical development and regulatory affairs are core competencies for me.  

Before examining the bioethical foundations of current policy and practice which underpin experimental COVID vaccine deployment in many in many western nations, allow me to begin by sharing some “real world” first-hand evidence.  

I was on a call with a Canadian primary care physician last week for a couple of hours. He related the story of the six (in his mind) highly unusual clinical cases of post-vaccination adverse events that he has personally observed in his practice involving vaccination of his patients with the Pfizer mRNA vaccine product. Keep in mind that it was Canadian physicians – acting of their own accord – who filed the FOIA to gain access to the Pfizer vaccine IND (see https://trialsitenews.com/did-pfizer-fail-to-perform-industry-standard-animal-testing-prior-to-initiation-of-mrna-clinical-trials/).

What was most alarming to me was that my clinical primary practice physician colleague told me that each of these cases were reported as per the proper channels in Canada, and each was summarily determined to not be vaccine related by the authorities without significant investigation. Furthermore, he reported to me that any practicing physician in Canada who goes public with concerns about vaccine safety is subjected to a storm of derision from academic physicians and potential termination of employment (state-controlled socialized medicine) and loss of license to practice.

This is one face of censorship in the time of COVID (see https://www.embopress.org/doi/full/10.15252/embr.202051420).  But what are official public health leaders afraid of? Why is it necessary to suppress discussion and full disclosure of information concerning mRNA reactogenicity and safety risks? Let’s analyze the vaccine-related adverse event data rigorously. Is there information or patterns that can be found, such as the recent finding of the cardiomyopathy signals, or the latent virus reactivation signals?  We should be enlisting the best biostatistics and machine learning experts to examine these data, and the results should- no must- be made available to the public promptly.  Please follow along and take a moment to examine the underlying bioethics of this situation with me.

I believe that adult citizens must be allowed free will, the freedom to choose. This is particularly true in the case of clinical research.  These mRNA and recombinant adenovirus vaccine products remain experimental at this time. Furthermore, we are supposed to be doing rigorous, fact-based science and medicine. If rigorous and transparent evaluation of vaccine reactogenicity and treatment-emergent post-vaccination adverse events is not done, we (the public health, clinical research and vaccine developer communities) play right into the hands of anti-vaxxer memes and validate many of their arguments. The suppression of information, discussion, and outright censorship concerning these current COVID vaccines which are based on gene therapy technologies cast a bad light on the entire vaccine enterprise.  It is my opinion that the adult public can handle information and open discussion. Furthermore, we must fully disclose any and all risks associated with these experimental research products.

In this context, the adult public are basically research subjects that are not being required to sign informed consent due to EUA waiver. But that does not mean that they do not deserve the full disclosure of risks that one would normally require in an informed consent document for a clinical trial.  And now some national authorities are calling on the deployment of EUA vaccines to adolescents and the young, which by definition are not able to directly provide informed consent to participate in clinical research  – written or otherwise.

The key point here is that what is being done by suppressing open disclosure and debate concerning the profile of adverse events associated with these vaccines violates fundamental bioethical principles for clinical research. This goes back to the Geneva convention and the Helsinki declaration. See https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/. There must be informed consent for experimentation on human subjects. The human subjects – you, me, and the citizens of these countries – must be informed of risks.  As a community, we have already had a discussion and made our decision – we cannot compel prisoners, military recruits, or any other population of humans to participate in a clinical research study.  For example, see the Belmont report, which provided the rationale for US federal law Code of Federal Regulations 45 CFR 46 (subpart A), referred to as “The Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects” (also known as the “Common Rule”).

Quoting from the Belmont Report: 

“Informed Consent. — Respect for persons requires that subjects, to the degree that they are capable, be given the opportunity to choose what shall or shall not happen to them. This opportunity is provided when adequate standards for informed consent are satisfied.

While the importance of informed consent is unquestioned, controversy prevails over the nature and possibility of an informed consent. Nonetheless, there is widespread agreement that the consent process can be analyzed as containing three elements: information, comprehension and voluntariness.”

https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html

Information, comprehension, and voluntariness.  To my eyes, it appears that in many regions public health leadership has stepped over the line and is now violating the bedrock principles which form the foundation upon which the ethics of clinical research are built.  I believe that this must stop.  We must have transparent public disclosure of risks – in a broad sense – associated with these experimental vaccines.  It is either that, or the entire modern bioethical structure which supports human subjects research will have to be re-thought.

I really think we need to 

“stop, children, what’s that sound – everybody look what’s going down” 

(For What it’s Worth, Buffalo Springfield)

Furthermore, as these vaccines are not yet market authorized (licensed), coercion of human subjects to participate in medical experimentation is specifically forbidden. Therefore, public health policies which meet generally accepted criteria for coercion to participate in clinical research are forbidden.  

For example, if I were to propose a clinical trial involving children and entice participation by giving out ice cream to those willing to participate, any institutional human subjects safety board (IRB) in the United States would reject that protocol. If I were to propose a clinical research protocol wherein the population of a geographic region would lose personal liberties unless 70% of the population participated in my study, once again, that protocol would be rejected by any US IRB based on coercion of subject participation. No coercion to participate in the study is allowed. In human subject clinical research, in most countries of the world this is considered a bright line that cannot be crossed. So, now we are told to waive that requirement without even so much as open public discussion being allowed?  

In conclusion, I hope that you will join me; stop to take a moment and consider for yourself what is going on. The logic seems clear to me. 1) An unlicensed medical product deployed under emergency use authorization (EUA) remains an experimental product under clinical research development. 2) EUA authorized by national authorities basically grants a short-term right to administer the research product to human subjects without written informed consent. 3) The Geneva Convention, the Helsinki declaration, and the entire structure which supports ethical human subjects research requires that research subjects be fully informed of risks and must consent to participation without coercion. Has that bright line been crossed? If so, what actions are to be taken? I look forward to learning from your thoughts and conclusions.

1,000 Lawyers and 10,000 Doctors Have Filed a Lawsuit for Violations of the Nuremberg Code

The New Nuremberg Trials 2021

A team of over 1,000 lawyers and over 10,000 medical experts led by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich have begun legal proceedings against the CDC, WHO & the Davos Group for crimes against humanity. Fuellmich and his team present the faulty PCR test and the order for doctors to label any comorbidity death as a Covid death as fraud. The PCR test was never designed to detect pathogens and is 100% faulty at 35 cycles. All the PCR tests overseen by the CDC are set at 37 to 45 cycles. The CDC admits that any tests over 28 cycles are not admissible for a positive reliable result. This alone invalidates over 90% of the alleged covid cases / ”infections” tracked by the use of this faulty test.

In addition to the flawed tests and fraudulent death certificates, the “experimental” vaccine itself is in violation of Article 32 of the Geneva Convention. Under Article 32 of the 1949 Geneva Convention IV, “mutilation and medical or scientific experiments not necessitated by the medical treatment of a protected person” are prohibited. According to Article 147, conducting biological experiments on protected persons is a grave breach of the Convention.

The “experimental” vaccine is in violation of all 10 of the Nuremberg Codes which carry the death penalty for those who seek to violate these International Laws.

The “vaccine” fails to meet the following five requirements to be considered a vaccine and is by definition a medical “experiment” and trial:

Provides immunity to the virus
This is a “leaky” gene therapy that does not provide immunity to Covid and claims to reduce symptoms yet double-vaccinated are now 60% of the patients requiring ER or ICU with covid infections.

Protects recipients from getting the virus
This gene-therapy does not provide immunity and double-vaccinated can still catch and spread the virus.

Reduces deaths from the virus infection
This gene-therapy does not reduce deaths from the infection. Double-Vaccinated infected with Covid have also died.

Reduces circulation of the virus
This gene-therapy still permits the spread of the virus as it offers zero immunity to the virus.

Reduces transmission of the virus
This gene-therapy still permits the transmission of the virus as it offers zero immunity to the virus.

The following violations of the Nuremberg Code are as follows:

Nuremberg Code #1: Voluntary Consent is Essential

No person should be forced to take a medical experiment without informed consent. Many media, political and non-medical persons are telling people to take the shot. They offer no information as to the adverse effects or dangers of this gene-therapy. All you hear from them is – “ safe and effective” and “ benefits outweigh the risks.” Countries are using lockdowns, duress and threats to force people to take this vaccine or be prohibited to participate in free society under the mandate of a Vaccine Passport or Green Pass. During the Nuremberg trials, even the media was prosecuted and members were put to death for lying to the public, along with many of the doctors and Nazis found guilty of Crimes Against Humanity.

Nuremberg Code #2: Yield Fruitful Results Unprocurable By Other Means

As listed above, the gene-therapy does not meet the criteria of a vaccine and does not offer immunity to the virus. There are other medical treatments that yield fruitful results against Covid such as Ivermectin, Vitamin D, Vitamin C, Zinc and boosted immune systems for flu and colds.

Nuremberg Code #3: Base Experiments on Results of Animal Experimentation and Natural History of Disease

This gene therapy skipped animal testing and went straight to human trials. In mRNA research that Pfizer used – a candidate study on mRNA with rhesus macaques monkeys using BNT162b2 mRNA and in that study all the monkeys developed pulmonary inflammation but the researchers considered the risk low as these were young healthy monkeys from the age of 2-4. Israel has used Pfizer and the International Court of Law has accepted a claim for 80% of the recipients having pulmonary inflammation from being injected with this gene-therapy. Despite this alarming development Pfizer proceeded to develop their mRNA for Covid without animal testing.

Nuremberg Code #4: Avoid All Unnecessary Suffering and Injury

Since the rollout of the experiment and listed under the CDC VAERS reporting system over 4,000 deaths and 50,000 vaccine injuries have been reported in America. In the EU over 7,000 deaths and 365,000 vaccine injuries have been reported. This is a grievous violation of this code.

Nuremberg Code #5: No Experiment to be Conducted if There’s Reason to Think Injury or Death Will Occur

See #4, based on fact-based medical data this gene-therapy is causing death and injury. Past research on mRNA also shows several risks that have been ignored for this current trial gene-experiment. A 2002 study on SARS-CoV-1 spike proteins showed they cause inflammation, immunopathology, blood clots, and impede Angiotensin 2 expression. This experiment forces the body to produce this spike-protein inheriting all these risks.

Nuremberg Code #6: Risk Should Never Exceed the Benefit

Covid-19 has a 98-99% recovery rate. The vaccine injuries, deaths and adverse side-effects of mRNA gene-therapy far exceed this risk. The use of “leaky” vaccines was banned for agriculture use by the US and EU due to the Marek Chicken study that shows ‘hot-viruses’ and variants emerge… making the disease even more deadly. Yet, this has been ignored for human use by the CDC knowing fully the risk of new deadlier variants emerge from leaky vaccinations. The CDC is fully aware that the use of leaky vaccines facilitates the emergence of hot (deadlier)strains. Yet they’ve ignored this when it comes to human

Nuremberg Code #7: Preparation Must Be Made Against Even Remote Possibility of Injury, Disability or Death

There were no preparations made. This gene therapy skipped animal trials. The pharmaceutical companies’ own Phase 3 human clinical trials will not conclude until 2022 /2023. These vaccines were approved under an Emergency Use only act and forced on a misinformed public. They are NOT FDA-approved.

Nuremberg Code #8: Experiment Must Be Conducted by Scientifically Qualified Persons

Politicians, media and actors claiming that this is a safe and effective vaccine are not qualified. Propaganda is not medical science. Many retail outlets such as Walmart & drive-through vaccine centers are not qualified to administer experimental medical gene-therapies to the uninformed public.

Nuremberg Code #9: Anyone Must Have the Freedom to Bring the Experiment to an End At Any Time

Despite the outcry of over 85,000 doctors, nurses, virologists and epidemiologists – the experiment is not being ended. In fact, there are currently many attempts to change laws in order to force vaccine compliance. This includes mandatory and forced vaccinations. Experimental ‘update’ shots are planned for every 6 months without any recourse to the growing number of deaths and injuries already caused by this experiment. These ‘update’ shots will be administered without any clinical trials. Hopefully this new Nuremberg Trial will put an end to this crime against humanity.

Nuremberg Code #10: The Scientist Must Bring the Experiment to an End At Any Time if There’s Probable Cause of it Resulting in Injury or Death

It is clear in the statistical reporting data that this experiment is resulting in death and injury yet all the politicians, drug companies and so-called experts are not making any attempt to stop this gene-therapy experiment from inflicting harm on a misinformed public.

What can you do to help put an end to this crime against humanity? Share this information. Hold your politicians, media, doctors and nurses accountable – that if they are complicit in this crime against humanity they too are subject to the laws set forth in the Geneva Convention and Nuremberg Code and can be tried, found guilty and put to death. Legal proceedings are moving forward, evidence has been collected and a large growing body of experts are sounding the alarm.

Visit the Covid Committee website at: https://corona-ausschuss.de/ and if you have been affected by this crime, report the event, persons involved, and as much detail to the following website:

https://www.securewhistleblower.com/

Crimes against humanity affect us all. They are a crime against you, your children, your parents, your grandparents, your community and your country and your future.

Source: https://breaking-news.ca/the-new-nuremberg-trials-2021-please-share-this-

Over 7,200 Doctors and Scientists Sign Declaration Accusing COVID Policy-Makers of ‘Crimes Against Humanity’

A “Physicians’ Declaration” produced by an international alliance of physicians and medical scientists strongly condemns the global strategy to treat COVID, accusing policy-makers of potential “crimes against humanity” for preventing physicians from providing life-saving treatments for their patients and suppressing open scientific discussion.

The document states that “one size fits all” treatment recommendations have resulted in needless illness and death.

As of 1:00 Friday afternoon, the declaration had garnered over 3,100 signatures from doctors and scientists around the world. (See below for updated number).

A group of physicians and scientists met in Rome, Italy earlier this month for a three day Global Covid Summit to speak “truth to power about Covid pandemic research and treatment.”

The summit, which was held from September 12 to September 14,  gave the medical professionals an opportunity to compare studies, and assess the efficacy of the various treatments that have been developed in hospitals, doctors offices and research labs throughout the world.

The document, reprinted below in its entirety, sprang from a physicians conference in Puerto Rico .

“The Physicians’ Declaration was first read at the Rome Covid Summit, catalyzing an explosion of active support from medical scientists and physicians around the globe. These professionals were not expecting career threats, character assassination, papers and research censored, social accounts blocked, search results manipulated, clinical trials and patient observations banned, and their professional history and accomplishments altered or omitted in academic and mainstream media.”

Dr. Robert Malone, architect of the mRNA vaccine platform, read the Rome Declaration at the summit.

“Thousands have died from Covid as a result of being denied life-saving early treatment. The Declaration is a battle cry from physicians who are daily fighting for the right to treat their patients, and the right of patients to receive those treatments – without fear of interference, retribution or censorship by government, pharmacies, pharmaceutical corporations, and big tech. We demand that these groups step aside and honor the sanctity and integrity of the patient-physician relationship, the fundamental maxim “First Do No Harm”, and the freedom of patients and physicians to make informed medical decisions. Lives depend on it.

We the physicians of the world, united and loyal to the Hippocratic Oath, recognizing the profession of medicine as we know it is at a crossroad, are compelled to declare the following:

WHEREAS, it is our utmost responsibility and duty to uphold and restore the dignity, integrity, art and science of medicine;

WHEREAS, there is an unprecedented assault on our ability to care for our patients;

WHEREAS, public policy makers have chosen to force a “one size fits all” treatment strategy, resulting in needless illness and death, rather than upholding fundamental concepts of the individualized, personalized approach to patient care which is proven to be safe and more effective;

WHEREAS, physicians and other health care providers working on the front lines, utilizing their knowledge of epidemiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology, are often first to identify new, potentially life saving treatments;

WHEREAS, physicians are increasingly being discouraged from engaging in open professional discourse and the exchange of ideas about new and emerging diseases, not only endangering the essence of the medical profession, but more importantly, more tragically, the lives of our patients;

WHEREAS, thousands of physicians are being prevented from providing treatment to their patients, as a result of barriers put up by pharmacies, hospitals, and public health agencies, rendering the vast majority of healthcare providers helpless to protect their patients in the face of disease. Physicians are now advising their patients to simply go home (allowing the virus to replicate) and return when their disease worsens, resulting in hundreds of thousands of unnecessary patient deaths, due to failure-to-treat;

WHEREAS, this is not medicine. This is not care. These policies may actually constitute crimes against humanity.

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS:

RESOLVED, that the physician-patient relationship must be restored. The very heart of medicine is this relationship, which allows physicians to best understand their patients and their illnesses, to formulate treatments that give the best chance for success, while the patient is an active participant in their care.

RESOLVED, that the political intrusion into the practice of medicine and the physician/patient relationship must end. Physicians, and all health care providers, must be free to practice the art and science of medicine without fear of retribution, censorship, slander, or disciplinary action, including possible loss of licensure and hospital privileges, loss of insurance contracts and interference from government entities and organizations – which further prevent us from caring for patients in need. More than ever, the right and ability to exchange objective scientific findings, which further our understanding of disease, must be protected.

RESOLVED, that physicians must defend their right to prescribe treatment, observing the tenet FIRST, DO NO HARM. Physicians shall not be restricted from prescribing safe and effective treatments. These restrictions continue to cause unnecessary sickness and death. The rights of patients, after being fully informed about the risks and benefits of each option, must be restored to receive those treatments.

RESOLVED, that we invite physicians of the world and all health care providers to join us in this noble cause as we endeavor to restore trust, integrity and professionalism to the practice of medicine.

RESOLVED, that we invite the scientists of the world, who are skilled in biomedical research and uphold the highest ethical and moral standards, to insist on their ability to conduct and publish objective, empirical research without fear of reprisal upon their careers, reputations and livelihoods.

RESOLVED, that we invite patients, who believe in the importance of the physician-patient relationship and the ability to be active participants in their care, to demand access to science-based medical care.”

Update:

As of 10:30am ET on Sept. 29, over 7,200 doctors and scientists had signed the Rome Declaration.

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2021/09/24/over-3000-doctors-and-scientists-sign-declaration-accusing-covid-policy-makers-of-crimes-against-humanity/

==================================================================

Get a free copy of “Viral Outbreak and Disease – Truth, Freedom, and Health”.

Learn how to make and use Chlorine Dioxide Solution (CDS) for preventing and treating COVID-19 (the symptoms caused by viral infection and/or Graphene Oxide/radiation poisoning).

Children's hospitals now being flooded with INFANT cardiac patients

Investigative reporter Steve Kirsch says that children's hospitals all across the country are filling up with newborn babies that have serious cardiac problems, all because their mothers got "vaccinated" for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19). An email he received claims that one hospital's three NICUs (neonatal ICUs) are all completely full of infant patients. All of the babies came from mothers who are fully vaccinated, a nurse confirmed from their records, though hospital staff are not allowed to ask directly about the vaccination status of the mothers. "Because this is a third- or fourth-hand rumor, I would ordinarily try to confirm it before sharing with anyone," the email stated as a caveat. "But my initial Internet searches came up empty, and I worry that this is the sort of thing that might be effectively suppressed for quite a while by those in control of our largest hospitals – especially the ones currently busy firing doctors and nurses who refuse vaccination." Seeing as how it has been roughly nine months since "Operation Warp Speed" was first launched by Donald "father of the vaccine" Trump, who then passed the baton to "Pedo" Joe Biden, the world is just now starting to see the effects of it on babies born to mothers who got jabbed. "I was wondering whether it might be worth sharing with some of the Unity Project's scientific / medical advisor doctors who may have contacts 'on the inside' of large hospitals with NICUs, so long as they could be trusted to discretely investigate without risking their or our credibility by outing the story prior to confirmation," the email went on to state. "If this rumor could be confirmed and revealed, it could potentially, by itself, turn the tide of this war."

Hospital ICUs are being overrun with "fully vaccinated" patients

Kirsch asked any doctors out there who read his work to comment on the letter's claims, either to challenge or confirm them. Hundreds of people responded and here are some of their stories. (RELATED: Kirsh has also written about how 28 million children have to get jabbed in order to "save," supposedly, a mere 14 lives from "covid".) One person said there have been several articles published in recent days confirming that ICUs are "jam-packed" with sick and dying patients, many of whom are having to sit in hallways because there are no more beds available. "Rooms are full of patients with NON-COVID symptoms, i.e., they aren't there because of covid," this person added. "The suspected cause is secondary effects of the vaccine." "The question here is how many of these patients will soon be infants? The media and the medical community will not step up and tell you this. It will come from the fed-up grassroots of us who are more fearful of this government than of COVID." Another wrote about how it has been "clearly established" that the rate of spontaneous abortions has skyrocketed ever since Fauci Flu shots started being administered to pregnant women. "My daughter-in-law, who is unvaccinated and just delivered, was told by her doctor to not get the vaccine during her pregnancy because her last three patients all had miscarriages right after receiving it," this person explained. "I think Mr. Kirsch has provided notable caveats to the sourcing until better confirmed, but anyone following COVID vaccine research isn't at all surprised. It will be confirmed." One person shared a video from an alleged undertaker who says he is seeing many times the normal amount of fatalities among newborns in the age of Wuhan Flu injections. "He's not sure how many are pre-full term, but it doesn't really make a difference for purposes of unusual deaths associated with pregnancy / childbirth," this individual explained. Others questioned whether the email Kirsch received is legitimate, suggesting that it might be "poisoned bait" from "controlled opposition." While this is certainly possible, there does appear to be an uptick in infant hospitalizations now that covid jabs are being widely administered. "It's not just about the newborns with cardiac problems," noted another about how older children are also being damaged by the jabs. "How many times do we need to see young people getting mysterious heart attacks at the same time before people start becoming remotely curious?" Another speculated that if the vaccine spike proteins are capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier, then perhaps they also have the same permeability with respect to the placenta. "I would not be surprised if some of these babies get a nasty reaction," this person wrote. "What kind of demon would tell a preggo not to have a glass of wine, but by all means stick a needle and inject some experimental bio-material into her?" The latest news about Chinese Flu shots and the damage they are causing to human health can be found at ChemicalViolence.com. Sources for this article include: SteveKirsch.substack.com NaturalNews.com

The world is starting to notice how many young athletes are DYING after taking covid vaccines

Young, healthy athletes from around the world are suddenly starting to suffer from heart conditions, breathing difficulties, nervous system disorders, among other serious chronic diseases. Some athletes are collapsing on the playing field, never to wake again. A German newspaper, Berliner Zeitung, took note of this disturbing pattern of cardiac arrest in a report titled, “Puzzling heart diseases in football.” The report seeks to understand why an “unusually large number of professional and amateur soccer players have collapsed recently.” The world is starting to notice how many young athletes are suffering and DYING after taking covid vaccines. Jake Kazmarek, a 28-year-old bodybuilder died unexpectedly four days after taking a covid vaccine. Another recently-vaccinated athlete collapsed in the middle of a game; hockey player Boris Sadecky (24) died after suddenly collapsing on the ice.

Long list of young vaccinated athletes coming down with heart problems and cardiac arrest

The German report documents the sudden collapse of FC Barcelona’s Sergio Agüero, a 33-year-old striker who was taken off the field after suddenly coming down with breathing problems and dizzy spells. Sergio managed to survive, but there is a large number of athletes whose collapse led to hospitalization and early death. A 17-year-old soccer player named Dylan Rich died of a heart attack mid-game in England. A 24-year-old named Lucas Surek developed a heart muscle disorder and had to be kept out of the BFC Chemie Leipzig club. Twenty-five-year-old Kingsley Coman from FC Bayern Munich underwent heart surgery after suffering from a cardiac arrhythmia post vaccination. Belgium’s Rune Coghe (18) suffered a heart attack during a game. Thirty-one-year-old Fabrice N’ Sakala from Istanbul collapsed on the field and had to be taken to the hospital. Bitterfeld’s team leader, Dietmar Gladow also suffered a heart attack pre-game. Marvin Schumann a Gifhorn amateur, went into cardiac arrest and had to be revived. JSG Hoher Hagen had to revive a 17-year-old player mid-game in Hannoversch Munden. Other young people who suffered cardiac arrest on the playing field include Anil Usat from VFB Schwelm in Ennepetal, Dimitri Lienard from FC Strasbourg and Diego Ferchaud. This young 16-year-old collapsed in a U-18 league game in Saint-Lo. This should not be happening to young athletes. A 13-year-old soccer player form the Janus Nova club in Saccolongo Italy also collapsed right on the field. Belgian soccer player, Jente Van Genechten (25) went into cardiac arrest in a cup game. Another Belgian soccer player named Jens De Smet (27) died in the hospital after suffering from a heart attack, mid-game. The list of sudden adult death is exhaustive and includes trainers and referees. One game was abandoned because a referee went into cardiac arrest in Lauber SV in the Donauworth district. An assistant referee collapsed with heart problems at a game in Emersacker. A goalkeeping coach from SV Niederporing had a heart attack at a training session. During a team training, 53-year-old coach Antonello Campus collapsed in Sicily. An English line judge had to be carted off with heart problems at the World Cup qualification match for women in Chemnitz. The Covid Blog documents several other cases of young athletes dying suddenly in the United States. Watch this video to catch a glimpse of what's going on.

Spike proteins were designed to cause inflammation in the cardiovascular system

Young athletes who aren’t at risk from a natural infection are continuously being coerced to take experimental mRNA spike protein vaccines in order to keep their careers. The spike protein encoded in people’s cells was designed to kill red blood cells by hampering their ability to transport oxygen. The spike proteins have also been shown to cause clumping in the blood, leading to blood clots. Dr. Richard Fleming demonstrates this nefarious characteristic of the Pfizer vaccine, by showing microscopically how red blood cells are deprived of oxygen when they are contacted by the vaccine ingredients. As Dr. Judy Mikovits points out, these spike proteins were designed in a lab with a component from HIV. They also contain syncytin, allowing the vaccine to express cancer genes, cause reproductive harm and immunodeficiency. Even the Wall Street Journal is now commenting on the damage done by these vaccines, which includes heart inflammation, pericarditis and myocarditis. Watch Dr. Richard Fleming show how covid vaccines deplete oxygen levels in the blood.Sources include: BlacklistedNews.com TheCovidBlog.com Brighteon.com NaturalNews.com Brighteon.com