Part 3: Are the scientific journals censoring the science? My candid conversation with Dr Robert Malone. Sonia Elijah

This is part 3 of my series on censorship by the scientific journals. Part 1 and Part 2 can be read on Trial Site News.

I had the pleasure of interviewing Dr Robert Malone, inventor of mRNA technology and vaccine expert, for the second time. Malone revealed the alarming counts of censorship by the scientific journals and the major conflicts of interest at play. He exposed “another way the pharmaceutical industry can exert influence by bending the law.” Dr Malone spoke how Covid vaccine companies are being given special treatment by the FDA and that “the manipulation of the data is occurring on multiple levels.” He spoke about the strong disincentives for doctors to report vaccine adverse events to VAERS and explained the term “plausible deniability” in the context of why the CDC denies that there are any vaccine-related deaths. 

Subscribe to the Trialsitenews "Video" Channel

No spam - we promise

“We’re seeing obstructionism, across literature and the regulatory agencies.”

Dr Robert Malone is no stranger to censorship. His LinkedIn account has been suspended twice and a book he co-wrote with his wife, Dr Jill Glasspool Malone Ph.D., on preparing and protecting yourself from the novel coronavirus, was taken down by Amazon without any rationale or justification. He was the editor for the Dr Pierre Kory comprehensive review on ivermectin which was abruptly retracted by Frontiers in Pharmacology after it was published because of an anonymous ‘third-party’ complaint- despite it passing expert peer-review including senior reviewers from the FDA.

Malone candidly spoke how his own paper co-written with Kevin Tomera and Joseph Kittah on high-dose Famotidine and Celecoxib, passed three rounds of peer-review but was blocked by the editor and not published. Famotidine is an over-the-counter drug widely used for the suppression of gastric acid production. Last year, a Trial Site Newsarticle highlighted Dr Malone’s repurposing of Famotidine as an effective Covid-19 treatment by improving patient outcomes. Malone went on to talk about another paper he authored on Famotidine and Celecoxib and its interaction with Dexamethasone. It was submitted to a journal that eagerly sought it and said it was “within scope,” but then notified him that it was “outside of scope” and they could not accept it, and neither would any other journal.

“The FDA has thrown objection after objection.”

All Malone’s work on Famotidine and Celecoxib remains in pre-print form. He explained that “it’s taken us, meaning the contractors working with the US Department of Defense, over a year and a half to try and get the protocols for a clinical trial approved by the FDA, meanwhile Pfizer was able to rush their novel drug through in record time.. and we still can’t get approval to allow our trials to start.”

“All over the world we’ve got this process of ‘hunting’ physicians.”

Malone explained, it was a three-step process of “third parties” complaining about the physicians using these early treatment agents. It’s never the patients themselves. They complain to the medical boards who are obligated to open an investigation after a complaint is filed against a physician. The press is alerted and write multiple articles about the physicians under investigation, destroying the credibility of the physician and they’re typically fired from their hospital and are forced to become free agents. He went on to alarmingly say, “any dissent is weeded out, harassed, deprived of income and blocked from the ability to practice medicine.”

He contrasted this type of ‘witch hunt’ treatment with the academics who have faced no consequences for being responsible for the “cooked data from Harvard on the hydroxychloroquine story that’s infamous- which was withdrawn because the data base was entirely fraudulent..they’re still fully employed academics.”

Why the journals are not in the position to be independent.

Malone discussed an important mechanism being used by the pharmaceutical companies, which he learned about from speaking with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., which is that a large fraction of revenue for the journals comes from the sale of reprints to the pharmaceutical companies. He spoke about how the journals are dependent on this cash flow as the pharmaceutical companies buy large quantities of these reprints, which they hand out to physicians’ offices. This way the pharmaceutical companies are implicitly exerting ‘influence’ without overtly buying any stock or advertising in these journals.

“Rules and regulations on bioethics are being completely disregarded.”

We discussed how the FDA shockingly asked a federal judge to allow it to disclose all the data it relied upon to license the Pfizer Covid vaccine until 2076. This is after a FOIA request by a group of scientists, asking the federal government to share the data. The 1967 FOIA law required that federal agencies respond to requests within 20 business days. 

Plausible deniability and the manipulation of the data.

Malone went on to disclose that the “manipulation of data is occurring on multiple levels,” as there are strong disincentives for physicians to report Covid vaccine adverse events to VAERS. This is in direct contrast with the strong incentives in hospitals to over report Covid related deaths. He went on to say that the average cost of a hospitalized Covid patient is $300-400K and part of that cost is driven by the expensive drug Remdesivir, which has strong side effects and the WHO discourages its use.

Malone talked in detail about Kennedy’s new book, The Real Anthony Fauci, and how he makes the case that the manipulation of the data is “intentional” because of the clauses in the infamous Pfizer contracts. Pfizer requires full indemnification from any country that wishes to purchase its product, with the caveat that “Pfizer has to disclose any adverse events or risks that they’re aware of. Pfizer has a perverse incentive to never be aware of an adverse event risk.” This implies that if they’re never aware then they can never be held accountable, “they can claim plausible deniability and therefore not have to report any of the risks.”

Revolving doors

Malone spoke at length of the “amazing concordance between the interests of Pfizer as a company, Moderna and the US government, we know that Pfizer and Moderna are operating with patents from the US government.”

He revealed the long record of FDA administrators that retire and then go work for Pfizer and how elected officials all the way down to the local level receive money from this pharmaceutical company. We went on to discuss how billions of dollars from Pfizer also go to the media. This explains how all the different mainstream media outlets have “the same script about the threat to democracy by anti-vaxxers.”

Follow the money trail to BlackRock.

In Malone’s opinion, if you follow the money trail, it leads to BlackRock and The Vanguard Group. These two multi-national investment corporations, jointly manage $16.5 trillion’s worth of global assets. This has given them incredible control and therefore it’s “best to think of Pfizer, Reuters, FaceBook, Google, Twitter, Washing Post etc. as divisions of one company.”

Malone shockingly revealed that having spoken twice at the Heritage Foundation to conservative groups about the threat of global totalitarianism and what’s going on behind it, their response was that they were fully aware and of this and the ties with BlackRock and the Chinese Communist Party. They informed him that a large amount of information was going to be coming out soon.

“The future of global totalitarianism is already here- it’s just unevenly distributed.”

Malone discussed how we’re seeing the face of this global totalitarianism in the recent shocking actions of the Austrian government by bringing in legislation to make the Covid vaccines compulsory from 1 February 2022. Also, in the actions of the Australian government, which has authorized troops to “grab people who have the infection and take them to concentration camps and their contacts in this mad idea that somehow they can stop a virus by doing this. This virus is unstoppable, and the vaccines are ineffective. The only option is to deploy early life saving therapy to keep people out of the hospital.”

“Think global, act local.”

In Malone’s wish to close on a positive note, he coined the slogan, “Think global, act local.” This is how a person can empower oneself with information, such as printing out the FLCCC protocols and hand them out to people in their local community. He spoke about the importance of “hope being therapeutic” and the setting up of clinics in tele-medicine by the doctors and nurses who’ve been forced to resign and the setting up of homeschools by the teachers who’ve resigned for refusing to take the vaccines.

“This is how we can build a new health care system, one that is more patient centric and there’s going to be a huge demand for it because patients are not being well served, certainly not in the United States.”

Note that views expressed in this opinion article are the writer’s personal views and not necessarily those of TrialSite.

By Sonia Elijah

This is part 3 of my series on censorship by the scientific journals. Part 1 and Part 2 can be read on Trial Site News.

I had the pleasure of interviewing Dr Robert Malone, inventor of mRNA technology and vaccine expert, for the second time. Malone revealed the alarming counts of censorship by the scientific journals and the major conflicts of interest at play. He exposed “another way the pharmaceutical industry can exert influence by bending the law.” Dr Malone spoke how Covid vaccine companies are being given special treatment by the FDA and that “the manipulation of the data is occurring on multiple levels.” He spoke about the strong disincentives for doctors to report vaccine adverse events to VAERS and explained the term “plausible deniability” in the context of why the CDC denies that there are any vaccine-related deaths. 

“We’re seeing obstructionism, across literature and the regulatory agencies.”

Dr Robert Malone is no stranger to censorship. His LinkedIn account has been suspended twice and a book he co-wrote with his wife, Dr Jill Glasspool Malone Ph.D., on preparing and protecting yourself from the novel coronavirus, was taken down by Amazon without any rationale or justification. He was the editor for the Dr Pierre Kory comprehensive review on ivermectin which was abruptly retracted by Frontiers in Pharmacology after it was published because of an anonymous ‘third-party’ complaint- despite it passing expert peer-review including senior reviewers from the FDA.

Malone candidly spoke how his own paper co-written with Kevin Tomera and Joseph Kittah on high-dose Famotidine and Celecoxib, passed three rounds of peer-review but was blocked by the editor and not published. Famotidine is an over-the-counter drug widely used for the suppression of gastric acid production. Last year, a Trial Site Newsarticle highlighted Dr Malone’s repurposing of Famotidine as an effective Covid-19 treatment by improving patient outcomes. Malone went on to talk about another paper he authored on Famotidine and Celecoxib and its interaction with Dexamethasone. It was submitted to a journal that eagerly sought it and said it was “within scope,” but then notified him that it was “outside of scope” and they could not accept it, and neither would any other journal.

“The FDA has thrown objection after objection.”

All Malone’s work on Famotidine and Celecoxib remains in pre-print form. He explained that “it’s taken us, meaning the contractors working with the US Department of Defense, over a year and a half to try and get the protocols for a clinical trial approved by the FDA, meanwhile Pfizer was able to rush their novel drug through in record time.. and we still can’t get approval to allow our trials to start.”

“All over the world we’ve got this process of ‘hunting’ physicians.”

Malone explained, it was a three-step process of “third parties” complaining about the physicians using these early treatment agents. It’s never the patients themselves. They complain to the medical boards who are obligated to open an investigation after a complaint is filed against a physician. The press is alerted and write multiple articles about the physicians under investigation, destroying the credibility of the physician and they’re typically fired from their hospital and are forced to become free agents. He went on to alarmingly say, “any dissent is weeded out, harassed, deprived of income and blocked from the ability to practice medicine.”

He contrasted this type of ‘witch hunt’ treatment with the academics who have faced no consequences for being responsible for the “cooked data from Harvard on the hydroxychloroquine story that’s infamous- which was withdrawn because the data base was entirely fraudulent..they’re still fully employed academics.”

Why the journals are not in the position to be independent.

Malone discussed an important mechanism being used by the pharmaceutical companies, which he learned about from speaking with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., which is that a large fraction of revenue for the journals comes from the sale of reprints to the pharmaceutical companies. He spoke about how the journals are dependent on this cash flow as the pharmaceutical companies buy large quantities of these reprints, which they hand out to physicians’ offices. This way the pharmaceutical companies are implicitly exerting ‘influence’ without overtly buying any stock or advertising in these journals.

“Rules and regulations on bioethics are being completely disregarded.”

We discussed how the FDA shockingly asked a federal judge to allow it to disclose all the data it relied upon to license the Pfizer Covid vaccine until 2076. This is after a FOIA request by a group of scientists, asking the federal government to share the data. The 1967 FOIA law required that federal agencies respond to requests within 20 business days. 

Plausible deniability and the manipulation of the data.

Malone went on to disclose that the “manipulation of data is occurring on multiple levels,” as there are strong disincentives for physicians to report Covid vaccine adverse events to VAERS. This is in direct contrast with the strong incentives in hospitals to over report Covid related deaths. He went on to say that the average cost of a hospitalized Covid patient is $300-400K and part of that cost is driven by the expensive drug Remdesivir, which has strong side effects and the WHO discourages its use.

Malone talked in detail about Kennedy’s new book, The Real Anthony Fauci, and how he makes the case that the manipulation of the data is “intentional” because of the clauses in the infamous Pfizer contracts. Pfizer requires full indemnification from any country that wishes to purchase its product, with the caveat that “Pfizer has to disclose any adverse events or risks that they’re aware of. Pfizer has a perverse incentive to never be aware of an adverse event risk.” This implies that if they’re never aware then they can never be held accountable, “they can claim plausible deniability and therefore not have to report any of the risks.”

Revolving doors

Malone spoke at length of the “amazing concordance between the interests of Pfizer as a company, Moderna and the US government, we know that Pfizer and Moderna are operating with patents from the US government.”

He revealed the long record of FDA administrators that retire and then go work for Pfizer and how elected officials all the way down to the local level receive money from this pharmaceutical company. We went on to discuss how billions of dollars from Pfizer also go to the media. This explains how all the different mainstream media outlets have “the same script about the threat to democracy by anti-vaxxers.”

Follow the money trail to BlackRock.

In Malone’s opinion, if you follow the money trail, it leads to BlackRock and The Vanguard Group. These two multi-national investment corporations, jointly manage $16.5 trillion’s worth of global assets. This has given them incredible control and therefore it’s “best to think of Pfizer, Reuters, FaceBook, Google, Twitter, Washing Post etc. as divisions of one company.”

Malone shockingly revealed that having spoken twice at the Heritage Foundation to conservative groups about the threat of global totalitarianism and what’s going on behind it, their response was that they were fully aware and of this and the ties with BlackRock and the Chinese Communist Party. They informed him that a large amount of information was going to be coming out soon.

“The future of global totalitarianism is already here- it’s just unevenly distributed.”

Malone discussed how we’re seeing the face of this global totalitarianism in the recent shocking actions of the Austrian government by bringing in legislation to make the Covid vaccines compulsory from 1 February 2022. Also, in the actions of the Australian government, which has authorized troops to “grab people who have the infection and take them to concentration camps and their contacts in this mad idea that somehow they can stop a virus by doing this. This virus is unstoppable, and the vaccines are ineffective. The only option is to deploy early life saving therapy to keep people out of the hospital.”

“Think global, act local.”

In Malone’s wish to close on a positive note, he coined the slogan, “Think global, act local.” This is how a person can empower oneself with information, such as printing out the FLCCC protocols and hand them out to people in their local community. He spoke about the importance of “hope being therapeutic” and the setting up of clinics in tele-medicine by the doctors and nurses who’ve been forced to resign and the setting up of homeschools by the teachers who’ve resigned for refusing to take the vaccines.