Reprinted from the Bailiwick News - Vaccine hostility as an alternative to both vaccine hesitancy and vaccine confidence.

A short timeline of Congressional acts and appropriations demonstrating federal government intent to harm and kill with legal impunity using 'vaccines,' and effective execution of programs.

KATHERINE WATT

Orientation for new readers - American Domestic Bioterrorism Program - Tools for dismantling kill box anti-law

For readers looking for another way to explain the history and intentionality of the US government’s vaccine-mediated mass mutilation and mass murder campaigns.

Excerpts from the American Domestic Bioterrorism Program timeline:

• 1962/10/23 - Congress and President Kennedy passed Vaccination Assistance Act, PL 87-868, 76 Stat. 1155, funding “intensive vaccination programs” for children, especially preschool children.

• 1976/01 - Swine influenza/H1N1 outbreak started at Fort Dix; in April, Congress funded a vaccine development/mass vaccination through Merck; in August, Congress passed the National Swine Flu Immunization Program Act, including legal immunity for vaccine manufacturers for injuries and deaths caused by the vaccines, alternate federal compensation program. In late September injections began. Heart attacks, Guillain-Barre syndrome, deaths and other adverse effects resulted.

• 1976/04/15 - Congress and President Ford passed Emergency Supplemental Appropriations, PL 94-266, 90 Stat. 362, including $135 million for “a comprehensive, nationwide influenza immunization program.”

• 1976/08/12 - Congress and President Ford passed National Swine Flu Immunization Program Act - PL 94-380, 90 Stat. 1113. Included version of Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (passed in 1986) and Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (passed in 2005 in PREP Act).

• 1986/11/14 - Congress and President Reagan passed State Comprehensive Mental Health Services Plan Act - PL 99-660, 100 Stat 3743. Title III, National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, amended Public Health Service Act to establish and fund a National Vaccine Program; grant vaccine manufacturers legal immunity for injuries and deaths caused by their products; establish and fund an excise-tax-funded National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Codified at 42 USC 300aa.

• 1987/12/22 - Congress and President Reagan passed Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987, PL 100-203, 101 Stat. 1330, including Sec. 9201, Manufacturers Excise Tax on Certain Vaccines, to establish an excise tax on vaccines ordered and purchased by US government and manufactured by private companies, to fund the Vaccine Injury Compensation Trust Fund established in 1986. This act is the only act through which Congress has ever defined the term ‘vaccine,’ defining ‘vaccine’ as “any vaccine (A) which is listed in the table contained in [26 USC 4131(b)(1)], and (B) which is manufactured or produced in the United States or which entered into the United States for consumption, use or warehousing.” Congress at some point may have added the phrase that now appears at 26 USC 4132a(2) — “any substance designed to be administered to a human being for the prevention of 1 or more diseases” [as of June 2024, I have been unable to locate this amendment -KW] — but has never defined the term “vaccine” in physical, chemical or pharmacological terms, and neither has the HHS-FDA. See Dean v. HHS, No. 16–1245V, 2018 WL 3104388, at * 9 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. May 29, 2018), cited in 86 FR 6249, HHS Final Rule, National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program: Revisions to the Vaccine Injury Table.

• 2005/12/30 - Congress and President Bush passed Department of Defense, Emergency Supplemental Appropriations to Address Hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico, and Pandemic Influenza Act - PL 109-148, 119 Stat. 2818, Division C at last 14 pages: Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act. Amended Public Health Service Act. Established power of Secretary of Health and Human Services, during self-declared public health emergency under Section 319, to unilaterally issue declarations recommending “manufacture, testing, development, distribution, administration, or use of one or more covered countermeasures.” Codified at 42 USC 247d-6d(b). Added more detail on liability shields for pandemic and epidemic products and security countermeasures. Set pre-suit hurdle requiring HHS to first bring claims against defendants, and bar private claims until after HHS claims resolved, if and only if defendant found liable. Set liability standard at willful misconduct, “establishing a standard…more stringent than negligence in any form or recklessness,” requiring proof defendant 1) intentionally engaged in misconduct 2) proximate to victim’s injury or death. Established just-following-orders defense for vaccinators and others in the chain of distribution. Established court-alternative, tax-and-debt-funded Covered Countermeasure Process Fund, similar to Vaccine Injury Compensation Fund established in 1986 for products on childhood vaccine schedule. Another provision of the DOD Supplemental Emergency Appropriation funded the Public Health and Social Service Emergency Fund (PHSSEF), a slush fund under the control of the Secretary of Health and Human Services, with $3.3 billion to start.

Related:

March 13, 2024 - Regulatory simulations at home and abroad: statutory and regulatory definitions for drugs, biological products, and biosimilars.

Statutory and regulatory definitions of "vaccine"

Congress established the federal biological products licensing and regulation program in 1944.

Vaccines were added to the list of [non-] regulated, [fake-] licensed biological products by Congressional statute in 1970, and [non-]regulatory, [fake-]licensing functions were transferred from NIH to FDA in 1972; Congress did not define the term vaccine.

FDA regulations covering biological product manufacturing, including vaccines, were consolidated and re-published in 1973 [21 CFR 600-680], and have been amended extensively since; FDA did not define the term vaccine.

In 1976, Congress authorized and funded a nationwide vaccination campaign including liability exemption for manufacturers, for swine flu, (National Swine Flu Immunization Act, PL 94-380, 90 Stat. 1113) without defining the term vaccine.

In 1986, Congress authorized and funded a nationwide child vaccination program, including liability exemption for manufacturers and establishment of the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, (National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, PL 99-660, 100 Stat 3755, codified at 42 USC 300aa-1 to 34), without defining the term vaccine.

Vaccine has not been defined by Congress through amendments to the Food Drug and Cosmetics Act (FDCA), or to the Public Health Service Act (PHSA), and the term has not been defined by the FDA through regulations published in the Federal Register.

In 1987, Congress provided a statutory definition of [taxable] vaccine through the Internal Revenue Code, 26 USC 4132.

The "Certain vaccines" provision authorized collection of excise tax by the Treasury Secretary, from manufacturers, per dose of vaccine sold. The list of taxable vaccines has been expanded since 1987.

26 USC 4132a(2) Vaccine.

The term “vaccine” means any substance designed to be administered to a human being for the prevention of 1 or more diseases.

26 USC 4132a(1) Taxable vaccine

The term “taxable vaccine” means any of the following vaccines which are manufactured or produced in the United States or entered into the United States for consumption, use, or warehousing:

(A) Any vaccine containing diphtheria toxoid.

(B) Any vaccine containing tetanus toxoid.

(C) Any vaccine containing pertussis bacteria, extracted or partial cell bacteria, or specific pertussis antigens.

(D) Any vaccine against measles.

(E) Any vaccine against mumps.

(F) Any vaccine against rubella.

(G) Any vaccine containing polio virus.

(H) Any HIB vaccine.

(I) Any vaccine against hepatitis A.

(J) Any vaccine against hepatitis B.

(K) Any vaccine against chicken pox.

(L) Any vaccine against rotavirus gastroenteritis.

(M) Any conjugate vaccine against streptococcus pneumoniae.

(N) Any trivalent vaccine against influenza or any other vaccine against seasonal influenza.

(O) Any meningococcal vaccine.

(P) Any vaccine against the human papillomavirus.

Subscribe to Bailiwick News

By Katherine Watt · Hundreds of paid subscribers

Gen-X Catholic writing about Covid-times law, geopolitics, philosophy and theology.

https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/vaccine-hostility-as-an-alternative?publication_id=37889&post_id=145987725&isFreemail=true&r=16ettj&triedRedirect=true

Reprinted from Humanity United Now - Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD - They Are Using Lab-Grown Human Brains Called "Organoids" To Run Computers

ANA MARIA MIHALCEA, MD, PHD

I wanted to repost this article from zerohedge just to let you know how far advanced human hybrid technology already is. The original author is Michael Snyder. Remember my recent post when I had read the book Aftershock and how technocrats envision that technological advances would occur so rapidly, that humanity would be too overwhelmed to even do anything about it.

Understanding Future Shock And After Shock - The Technocratic Prediction That Common Man Will No Longer Understand Reality Due To The Exponential Pace Of Technological Advances

With the AI revolution that is certainly happening. Knowledge of the morphogenic field, the interconnectedness of all things in nature is something we should consider when parts of human brain tissue is controlled for AI computing. These people do not know what there is a vibratory frequency that connects all human brains. Or maybe they do?

You can find the original article here: They Are Using Lab-Grown Human Brains Called "Organoids" To Run Computers

When I first started researching this, I could hardly believe that it was true. A company in Switzerland known as “Final Spark” has constructed a bizarre hybrid biocomputer that combines lab-grown miniature human brains with conventional electronic circuits.  This approach saves an extraordinary amount of energy compared to normal computers, but there is a big problem.  The lab-grown miniature human brains keep wearing out and dying, and so scientists have to keep growing new ones to replace them. 

Stem cells that are derived from human skin tissue are used to create the 16 spherical brain “organoids” that the system depends upon.  I realize that this sounds like something straight out of a really bad science fiction movie, but it is actually happening.

Scientists at Final Spark are calling their hybrid computer “the Neuroplatform”, and it is being reported that it only uses “a fraction of the energy required to power a traditional set up”…

Swiss tech startup FinalSpark is now selling access to biocomputers that combine up to four tiny lab-grown human brains with silicon chips.

This new bioprocessing platform, called the Neuroplatform, uses small versions of human brains to do computer work instead of silicon chips. The company says it can fit 16 of these mini-brains onto the Neuroplatform and use a fraction of the energy required to power a traditional set up.

The platform, currently adopted by nine institutions, integrates hardware, software and biology to construct a processing system that is energy-efficient and high-performing.

This “breakthrough” is being hailed as a way to save a gigantic amount of energy.

But what about the lab-grown human brains that are being enslaved to run the Neuroplatform?

Each of the 16 mini-brains is made up of approximately 10,000 living neurons, and they are kept alive by a “microfluidics system that supplies water and nutrients for the cells”…

Rather than merely integrating biological concepts into computing, FinalSpark’s online platform ‘taps’ into spherical clusters of lab-grown human brain cells called organoids. A total of 16 organoids are housed within four arrays that connect to eight electrodes each and a microfluidics system that supplies water and nutrients for the cells.

The approach, known as wetware computing, in this case harnesses researchers’ abilities to culture organoids in the lab, a fairly new technology that allows scientists to study what are essentially mini replicas of individual organs.

During their short lives, the mini-brains are literally trained to perform certain tasks using a reward and punishment system…

Researchers do this by training the organoids through a reward system. The organoids are rewarded with dopamine, the neurotransmitter responsible for pleasure (and addiction).

Meanwhile, as “punishment,” the organoids are exposed to chaotic stimuli, such as irregular electrical activity.

If the enslaved mini-brains do what they are supposed to do, they are rewarded with lots of pleasure.

If the enslaved mini-brains do not do what they are supposed to do, they are hit with lots of “irregular electrical activity”.

In other words, these miniature human brains are tortured until they learn to obey.

Reading that should literally make you sick.

What these scientists are doing is so incredibly evil.

Final Spark claims that the miniature human brains use “a million times less power than their silicon counterparts”…

Swiss technology firm Final Spark has successfully launched Neuroplatform, the world’s first bioprocessing platform where human brain organoids (lab-grown miniaturized versions of organs) perform computational tasks instead of silicon chips.

The first such facility hosts the processing prowess of 16 brain organoids, which the company claims uses a million times less power than their silicon counterparts.

Final Spark hopes that their new “technology” will become the primary energy source for the AI revolution.

Because at this point training AI models uses a colossal amount of conventional energy…

According to Final Spark’s estimates, training the popular large language model GPT-3 that powered ChatGPT in its initial days alone consumed 10 GWh of energy. This is a whopping 6,000 times more energy than an average European city consumes in an entire year.

Replacing silicon chips with bioprocessors could lead to drastic energy savings. Final Spark allows research labs to experience the power of biological processors on the Neuroplatform.

To a lot of people out there, this is going to sound really great.

Final Spark insists that the processor that it has created will use a million times less energy compared to a normal silicon chip.

There is just one enormous problem.

The mini-brains keep dying and must be regularly replaced.

At first they would die “in just a few hours”, but now they are apparently living for up to 100 days…

Final Spark faced many challenges in its early years since the organoids would die in just a few hours. The company has worked on this shortcoming and improved its MEA systems to ensure that organoids live for 100 days.

These “organoids” are literally worked to death.

They are hooked up to electrodes and worked until they can work no more…

Final Spark has made working these varied components possible through an innovative setup called Multi-Electrode Arrays (MEAs), where the three-dimensional masses of brain tissue are placed.

Each MEA has four brain organoids that interface with eight electrodes. These electrodes perform the dual role of stimulating the organoids and recording the data they process.

Data transfer is done through digital analog converters with a 16-bit resolution and a 30 kHz frequency. A microfluidic system provides life support for the MEAs, and cameras can monitor their overall operation.

Have you ever seen “The Matrix”?

I was reminded of that film as I researched all of this.

Just like in that movie, human energy powers the entire system.

And just like in that movie, those that power the system are enslaved.

The creators of “the Neuroplatform” insist that this is perfectly okay because the mini-brains are not sentient beings.

Whether that is true or not, what they are doing is still very wrong.

Creating miniature human brains and using them to power a computer may be a way to save a lot of energy, but it also perfectly illustrates how far our society has fallen.

We are crossing lines that should never be crossed, and eventually we will pay a very great price for the crimes that our scientists are committing.

Humanity United Now - Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/they-are-using-lab-grown-human-brains?publication_id=956088&post_id=146019502&isFreemail=true&r=16ettj&triedRedirect=true

Reprinted from The Kingston Report - 2021 Staff E-Mail: FDA was MANDATED to Deliver 'Safe and Effective Vaccines'

The 2 most senior FDA officials on vaccine research abruptly announced their 'retirement' the same day the FDA approved Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA ‘vaccines.’ Were they coerced into approving the shots?

KAREN KINGSTON

June 26, 2024: Senator Thomas Massie is holding a hearing today to uncover what happened behind closed doors at the FDA that brought about the unexpected August 23, 2021, FDA approval of Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA ‘vaccines’ and the abrupt departure of the agency’s most senior officials on vaccine safety.

This Kingston Report is packed with the history Janet Woodcock acting as a reckless tyrant at the FDA, openly admitting to putting manufacturers’ profits over patients. Beginning in 1997, (and prior to the approval of the COVID-19 ‘vaccines’) Woodcock knowingly pushed through illicit FDA approvals of products that were known to provide no clinical benefits, cause harm, and even cause a mass onset of sudden deaths.

Senior FDA Vaccine Experts Announce “Retirement” the Same Day They Grant Pfizer’s ‘Vaccine’ FDA Approval

The Director of the Office of Vaccines Research and Review, Marion Gruber and her Deputy Director, Dr. Phil Krause, announced their “retirement” on the same day that they approved Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA ‘vaccines.’

Was Dr. Gruber Coerced into Approving Pfizer’s COVID-19 ‘Vaccines’?

It’s perplexing that while Dr. Marion Gruber personally issued the FDA approval letter of Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA injections on August 23, 2021, she also informed her boss, Peter Marks, of her “retirement” that same day.

August 24, 2021: Janet Woodcock Reminds FDA of their MANDATE to Deliver ‘Safe and Effective Vaccines’ via Staff E-Mail

https://karenkingston.substack.com/p/2021-staff-e-mail-fda-was-mandated?publication_id=1103773&post_id=145999542&isFreemail=true&r=16ettj&triedRedirect=true

Reprinted from BREITBART - Congressional Report: CIA Interfered in 2020 Election, Colluded with Biden Campaign to Discredit Hunter Biden Laptop Story

by WENDELL HUSEBØ 25 Jun 2024

The CIA interfered in the 2020 election by colluding with the Biden campaign to discredit the Hunter Biden laptop story, a congressional report found Tuesday.

“It’s inappropriate for a currently serving staff officer or contractor to be involved in the political process,” former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morell acknowledged to Congress during its investigation of the incident.

In 2020, 51 ex-spies signed an infamous letter that called reporting on Hunter’s laptop “Russian disinformation” ahead of the election. Current Secretary of State Antony Blinken allegedly coordinated the story for political purposes.

CNN reporter Natasha Bertrand wrote the infamous, and now discredited, Politico story that used “dozens of former intel officials” to push a false and misleading narrative about the origins of Hunter’s laptop.

President Joe Biden cited the story during a presidential debate with Trump to discredit the contents of the laptop.

The House Judiciary report on Monday alleged three key facts about the CIA’s involvement in the 2020 election:

• High ranking CIA officials, up to and including then-CIA Director Gina Haspel, were made aware of the Hunter Biden statement prior to its approval and publication. Because several former senior intelligence officials signed the statement, the PCRB sent the draft statement to the CIA’s then-Chief Operating Officer (COO) Andrew Makridis, who said he subsequently informed then-Director Haspel or then-Deputy Director Vaughn Frederick Bishop that the statement would be published soon. Senior CIA leadership had an opportunity at that time to slow down the CIA’s process for reviewing publication submissions and ensure that such an extraordinary statement was properly vetted.

• Some of the statement’s signatories, including Michael Morell, were on active contract with the CIA at the time of the Hunter Biden statement’s publication. Throughout the course of the Committees’ investigation, the signatories claimed to not have had access to any classified information when asserting that the allegations surrounding Hunter Biden’s laptop had “all the hallmarks” of Russian disinformation. However, at the time of the statement’s publication, at least two signatories—Morell and former CIA Inspector General David Buckley—were on the CIA’s payroll as contractors. Due to purported operational concerns, the CIA declined to declassify the entire universe of signatories who were on active contract. In addition, some signatories to the Hunter Biden statement also had special “Green Card” access to the CIA at the time of the statement’s publication, allowing them to gain entry to secure CIA facilities.

• After publication of the Hunter Biden statement, CIA employees internally expressed concern about the statement’s politicized content, acknowledging it was not “helpful to the Agency in the long run.” At least one employee found it “[i]nteresting to see what was submitted and approved” when discussing media talking points that the statement’s co-author, former Senior Intelligence Service Officer Marc Polymeropoulos, submitted related to the statement. When discussing Polymeropoulos’s talking points, another CIA official stated, “It appears [Polymeropoulos] is actively involved in a pro-Biden campaign and may be disclosing classified information in his efforts.” The CIA’s internal review board, known as the Prepublication Classification Review Board (PCRB), determined that Polymeropoulos’s talking points contained classified information that had to be removed prior to publication.

The full report is here.

Seventy-one percent of Americans believe accurate reporting of Hunter’s “Laptop from Hell” could have altered the 2020 presidential election, TIPP Insights polling revealed in 2022.

https://www.breitbart.com/2024-election/2024/06/25/congressional-report-cia-interfered-2020-election-colluded-biden-campaign-discredit-hunter-laptop-story/

Reprinted from Just the News - Feds try to delay release of non-public COVID vaccine safety data until at least 2026

Biden administration seeks 18-month stay before processing Just the News open records request, America First Legal calls delay request "shocking."

By John Solomon

The Biden administration is seeking to delay until at least 2026 the release of COVID-19 vaccine safety data that has been kept outside the government’s normal adverse events reporting system.

The Departments of Justice and Health and Human Services asked U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton this week to issue an 18-month stay that keeps them from having to release the Food and Drug  Administration’s data to Just the News under the Freedom of Information Act.

The federal agencies alleged that “exceptional circumstances” exist to necessitate the delay in compliance with the open records law because the FDA is stretched thin by numerous other requests for public information related to the pandemic.

The agency “has been dealing with an unprecedented workload requiring FOIA productions involving approximately 5.7 million pages of COVID-19 vaccine records in a compressed timeframe,” the government argued in the motion filed Tuesday night.

The government revealed it has secured stays in seven other cases seeking records and asked Walton to do the same with the Just the News request. Federal lawyers claim the agency hired several new employees to try to speed up processing but that it can take up to two years to train new staff to process such requests.

“Thus, despite the Branch’s good-faith investment in increasing its future processing capacity by training new employees, its resources remain limited during this lengthy onboarding period,” the government claimed.

Just the News, which is represented in the case by the America First Legal public interest law firm, is opposing the stay and a status conference is scheduled Thursday before the judge.

Gene Hamilton, America First Legal’s general counsel and vice president, on Wednesday dismissed the government’s request as a delay tactic that will keep patients who might consider getting additional vaccine boosters from having full data to make an informed decision.

“This is a typical government excuse which is,’ Oh, we're so busy, we don't have the resources to help provide you, the American people with the information that you need,’” Hamilton told the Just the News, No Noise television show.

“So you just need to wait until 18 months from now. And maybe you'll get to see it, maybe you won't. And what they're hoping to do is stretch this out to the point where everybody forgets about it,” he added.

Hamilton said his law firm found evidence recently that FDA had enough resources to post Internet memes during the pandemic and that it could certainly find personnel or contractors to speed up release of the vaccine safety data that can be important to patients and doctors making health decisions,

The database contains information that “everyone has a right to know,” Hamilton said. “People need to have the right to engage in informed consent before they're about to engage in some kind of medical procedure. People have the right to know things that are about their health, about the risks, and if there's any benefits, certainly, but if there's all of the risks.

“They need to know what the government knows, and the fact that we're having to sue with y'all to try to get access to this information, just to provide people with what they need to make their own decision, should be totally unacceptable and shocking to every American,” he added.

Just the News and America First Legal sued the Biden administration in February, asking the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., to order the Department of Health and Human Services to comply with two Freedom of Information Act requests to the FDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention seeking COVID-19 reactions data kept in a back-end, nonpublic system to the nation’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

VAERS is the nation’s repository for all reports of patients suffering reactions or adverse events – up to and including death – after receiving vaccines.

The suit quoted government officials, news articles and private-sector scientists working with the government on VAERS data who stated publicly there is a private database affiliated with VAERS that includes data that is not accessible to the public but includes important safety information specifically on COVID-19 jabs.

“The public-facing database contains only initial reports, while the private, back-end system contains all updates and corrections – such as a formal diagnosis, recovery, or death,” the lawsuit explained.

You can read the full lawsuit here:

ECF 001 - Solomon v. HHS, Complaint.pdf

The lawsuit provided the court a powerful example of the type of information that is currently not being given the public in the VAERs because it is kept in the backend system, according to information published recently by the major medical journal publishing company BMJ.

“The public VAERS database reportedly did not include an autopsy examiner’s conclusion that the death of a 15-year-old boy was caused by ‘stress cardiomyopathy following [his] second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech covid-19 vaccine,’” the suit said.

Just the News filed FOIA requests for the back-end data with both the FDA and the CDC on Jan.6. The FDA assigned a control number for its request but never complied with providing any data, the suit said.

The CDC came back in February declining to provide any data, claiming the requested information “fell under the jurisdiction of the [FDA]” and “referred Mr. Solomon’s initial request to FDA and administratively closed the initial request,” the suit stated.

Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., who has held hearings on concerns and public mistrust about COVID-19 vaccines, told Just the News earlier this year that drug companies and their allies in the regulatory agencies have been so invested in the success of MRNA vaccines technology and the profits of the COVID-19 vaccines that he fears they are keeping negative information from coming to light.

“They're going to continue to cover up the real the damage being done by these what I would consider now very dangerous, very suspect mRNA vaccines,” he said.

Drugmakers, the FDA and CDC have acknowledged there is evidence of adverse events like myocarditis – inflammation of the heart – but that such affects are rare  and shouldn’t scare Americans from getting the shots.

In fact, the CDC recommended in February that Americans over the age of 65 should get an additional vaccine booster in 2024.

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/health/feds-try-delay-release-non-public-covid-vaccine-safety-data-until-least-2026

Reprinted from the Clandestine's Newsletter -

CLANDESTINE JUN 26

New report from Russian MIL, alleging that the Pentagon relocated their bioweapon operation to Africa, due to Russia’s liberation of the labs in Ukraine.

Kirillov alleges that Biden-owned Metabiota, and other intermediary NGOs, are running cover for the US State Dept and DoD, posing as a humanitarian operation, to conceal their true objective of pathogen production for Big Pharma.

Kirillov also points out that Biden-owned Metabiota, have been forced to stop operating in many countries in Africa, due to awareness of their nefarious biological activity and agenda.

Also keep in mind, the founder of Biden-owned Metabiota is Ghislaine Maxwell and Clinton affiliate, Virologist Nathan Wolfe.

Later in the briefing, Kirillov also alleges the US are planning to spread disease via migratory birds. This comes after Kirillov previously alleged that the US plan to manufacture ANOTHER pandemic for the 2024 election like they did in 2020. Bird Flu comes to mind.

Clandestine’s Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

https://bioclandestine.substack.com/p/deep-state-bio-network-moves-to-africa?publication_id=782803&post_id=146000460&isFreemail=true&r=16ettj&triedRedirect=true

Reprinted from The Kingston Report - Intended Consequences: mRNA 'Vaccines' were Designed to Cause Severe Disease and Be Resistant to Antibodies

Per data published by the inventors of the spike protein, the antibodies produced by the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines were purposefully designed to cause disease and unable to protect against infection.

KAREN KINGSTON

June 25, 2024: More experts are coming forward verifying that the ‘spike protein’, SARS-2 ‘virus,’ and COVID-19 mRNA injections were designed to be resistant to antibodies and cause disease.

Intended Consequences

Originally Published on November 29, 2022: Barney Graham of the NIAID and Jason McClellan of the University of Texas are the inventors. Graham and McLellan tested the neutralizing ability of the synthetically recreated antibodies produced by the human immune system against coronavirus trimeric (S-2P) spike proteins. Their research showed that none of the antibodies for coronaviruses bound to the new trimeric two-proline spike (S-2P) proteins and no coronavirus antibodies were able to neutralize it.

In a February 19, 2020, article in Science, authored by the inventors of coronavirus S-2P spike proteins, Barney Graham and Jason McClellan, the authors state that the S-2P ‘spike protein’ has stronger binding affinity to the ACE-2 receptors (in the hearts, lungs, kidneys, and endothelial cell line of blood vessels) than the original SARS-CoV-2 (S) spike protein.

Graham and McLellan also tested synthetically recreated antibodies for coronaviruses (SARS-CoV-2) against the S-2P spike proteins. Their research showed that none of the antibodies for coronaviruses bound to the new trimeric two-proline spike (S-2P) proteins and no coronavirus antibodies were able to neutralize it.

The Kingston Report is a reader-supported publication. Consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

https://karenkingston.substack.com/p/intended-consequences-mrna-vaccines-ac3?publication_id=1103773&post_id=143439313&isFreemail=true&r=16ettj&triedRedirect=true