Reprinted from the GATEWAY PUNDIT - Explosive Study Once Removed by Lancet within 24 Hours, Now Peer-Reviewed and Public: Reveals 74% of Deaths Directly Linked to COVID-19 Shot

By Jim Hᴏft Jun. 23, 2024

A previously censored paper from The Lancet has now undergone peer review and is available online.

The study, titled “A Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths After COVID-19 Vaccination,” analyzed 325 autopsy cases and found that a staggering 73.9% of deaths were either directly due to or significantly contributed to by the COVID-19 vaccination.

The paper’s lead author, Dr. Nicolas Hulscher, faced significant opposition in bringing these findings to light. After initially being downloaded over 100,000 times, The Lancet removed the paper within 24 hours, according to Dr. William Makis. 

According to The Daily Sceptic, the reason given at the time was, “This preprint has been removed by Preprints with the Lancet because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.”

The news outlet added:

How to Get the Prescription McCullough Protocol Before the Government Bans It

“Without further detail from the Preprints with the Lancet staff who removed the paper it is hard to know what substance the claim that the conclusions are not supported by the methodology really has. A number of the authors of the paper are at the top of their fields so it is hard to imagine that the methodology of their review was really so poor that it warranted removal at initial screening rather than being subject to full critical appraisal. It smacks instead of raw censorship of a paper that failed to toe the official line. Keep in mind that the CDC has not yet acknowledged a single death being caused by the Covid mRNA vaccines. Autopsy evidence demonstrating otherwise is clearly not what the U.S. public health establishment wants to hear.”

In a post on X Friday, Dr. William Makis shared the exciting news.

“BREAKING NEWS: Our LANCET CENSORED Paper is now peer reviewed and available online!” Makis wrote on X.

“Incredible perseverence [sic] by first author Nicolas Hulscher who didn’t give up after LANCET pulled our paper within 24 hours after 100,000s of downloads for no legitimate reason. Big pharma put the squeeze on The Lancet but has failed to stop us.”

“Our paper was delayed by one year, and those actions of CENSORSHIP and CANCELLATION led to many deaths that could have been prevented. This paper could be a game changer,” Makis added.

According to the study:

Methods

We searched PubMed and ScienceDirect for all published autopsy and necropsy reports relating to COVID-19 vaccination up until May 18th, 2023. All autopsy and necropsy studies that included COVID-19 vaccination as an antecedent exposure were included.

Because the state of knowledge has advanced since the time of the original publications, three physicians independently reviewed each case and adjudicated whether or not COVID-19 vaccination was the direct cause or contributed significantly to death.

Results

We initially identified 678 studies and, after screening for our inclusion criteria, included 44 papers that contained 325 autopsy cases and one necropsy case. The mean age of death was 70.4 years.

The most implicated organ system among cases was the cardiovascular (49%), followed by hematological (17%), respiratory (11%), and multiple organ systems (7%). Three or more organ systems were affected in 21 cases.

The mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days. Most deaths occurred within a week from last vaccine administration.

A total of 240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated as directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination, of which the primary causes of death include sudden cardiac death (35%), pulmonary embolism (12.5%), myocardial infarction (12%), VITT (7.9%), myocarditis (7.1%), multisystem inflammatory syndrome (4.6%), and cerebral hemorrhage (3.8%).

According to the VAERS COVID Adverse Event Reports that track all of the COVID-reported vaccine deaths and complications, 37,647 people have died from the COVID-19 vaccine – as of May 31, 2024.

These are the vaccine-related deaths that were reported.

Source: VAERS COVID Adverse Event Reports

Source: VAERS COVID Adverse Event Reports

And still, doctors are pushing the vaccine on their patients! The money must be very, very good!

Vigilant Fox shared this clip by Jimmy Dore in this explosive report:

Another COVID “conspiracy theory” becomes reality as a bombshell study CENSORED by The Lancet has now been peer-reviewed.

What were they trying to hide, you ask?

Lots and lots of vaccine deaths.

After analyzing 325 COVID vaccine autopsy cases, the now peer-reviewed study found that “a total of 240 deaths, which is 73.9%, were independently adjudicated as DIRECTLY DUE to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination.”

Jim Hᴏft

Jim Hᴏft is the founder and editor of The Gateway Pundit, one of the top conservative news outlets in America. Jim was awarded the Reed Irvine Accuracy in Media Award in 2013 and is the proud recipient of the Breitbart Award for Excellence in Online Journalism from the Americans for Prosperity Foundation in May 2016.

You can email Jim Hᴏft here, and read more of Jim Hᴏft's articles here.

 Search for:

Video of the Week

Blessed News’ and Gateway Pundit’s “Inside J6” Podcast – a Weekly Recap on J6 News and Exclusive Interviews

Trending on TGP

Become A TGP Insider

Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Visit AmericanGulag.org to learn how to help the prisoners of the protest on January 6th.

Visit TGPVideos.com to watch the latest exclusive videos from The Gateway Pundit.

As the mainstream media repeatedly fails and loses public trust, TGP has continued to offer accurate and timely reporting for almost two decades. Visit TGP FactCheck to see how we get it right.

Check out TGP FactCheck to see how terribly wrong the legacy media can get it.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/06/lancet-journal-study-finds-73-9-deaths-following/


Reprinted from the COURAGEOUS DISCOURSE - Bird Flu: Separating Fact from Fiction and True Danger from Fear-mongering

A McCullough Foundation Production

JOHN LEAKE JUN 18, 2024

The McCullough Foundation has just produced a 25-minute video about the latest variant of highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza, and how the U.S. and E.U. governments are responding to it. We believe there is growing evidence that this variant of bird flu is becoming the “Disease X” the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex has been warning about in recent years, and now getting a great deal of media coverage as we approach the 2024 presidential election in the United States.

In the video, we examine the grounds for believing that bird flu is a real pathogen that affects wild and domesticated birds, and could pose a threat to human health. However, we also examine the grounds for suspecting that this threat may be grossly exaggerated and distorted to justify selling vast quantities of bird flu tests and vaccines to the governments of the world.

We also examine the wild card of Gain-of-Function experiments on H5N1 being performed in labs all over the world, and their potential threat to human health.

Generally, we believe it is important to acquire as much knowledge as possible about phenomena that are represented by the media and government as being matters of grave concern. Only those who are thoroughly informed will be able to make rational assessments about what we are being told. As James Madison remarked, “Knowledge will forever govern ignorance, and a people who mean to be their own governors, must arm themselves with the power knowledge gives.”

To watch the video, please click on the link below.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAYPF2eiwr0

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/bird-flu-separating-fact-from-fiction

Reprinted from Clandestine's Newsletter - Russia Declare US Responsible for “Terrorist” Missile Strike in Crimea

CLANDESTINE JUN 23, 2024

⚠️WW3 Alert⚠️

Russian MIL declare “terrorist” US responsible for deaths of Russian civilians in Crimea!

Russian MIL report that US-made ATCAMS cluster missiles, assisted by US satellite reconnaissance, were fired by Ukraine into Sevastopol.

Russia claim they intercepted the missiles, but the fragments of one of them broke off, detonated, and the explosion killed 5 civilians, including 3 children, and injuring 124+ more.

Russian MIL claim that “such actions are not going to be left unanswered”.

Regardless of who or what you believe, the reality is, we are closer to nuclear war than we have been since 1962. The West, led by the corrupt and warmongering Biden regime (Obama), continue to provoke Putin, in the hopes that he will escalate.

The Deep State are trying to initiate WW3, but need to make it look like Russia’s fault.

Clandestine’s Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

https://bioclandestine.substack.com/p/russia-declare-us-responsible-for?publication_id=782803&post_id=145923101&isFreemail=true&r=16ettj&triedRedirect=true

Reprinted from The Karen Kingston Report - EcoHealth Used Nanoparticles to Create Pandemics with Chinese Colleagues

During a 2016 lecture, Peter Daszak explains how EcoHealth Alliance collaborated with colleagues in China to create pathogens, including SARS-2. And it’s not a gain-of-function ‘virus’…

KAREN KINGSTON

June 22, 2024: In February 2016, Dr. Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance, gave a lecture on the History & Future of Pandemics. Daszak explains how EcoHealth Alliance collaborated with colleagues in China to create the SARS-CoV-2 pathogen, and it’s not a gain-of-function ‘virus’…at least not how most people think of a virus. Check out the video.

“Like with a known nasty pathogen, just like we did with SARS. So we sequenced the spike protein, the protein that attaches to cells. Then we, well my colleagues in China did the work, you create pseudo-particles, you insert the spike proteins, from those viruses, to see if they can bind to human cells. Each step of this process, you move closer to, ‘This virus could really become pathogenic in people…’.

and you end up with a small number of viruses that really do like killers.” - Peter Daszak, C-SPAN, February 2016

COVID-19 Was Caused By Engineered Nanoparticles

If you listen carefully, Daszak explains that the cause of COVID-19 was not a ‘virus.’ COVID-19 disease is caused by lab-made spike proteins that mimic the genetic sequences of viruses and then are loaded into pseudo-particles (nanoparticles).

Let’s listen to Daszak one more time. He confesses to working with ‘colleagues in China’. His words match EcoHealth Alliance’s 2018 pitch to DARPA to create the SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 ‘pandemic’.

Nanobiotechnology and Biowarfare

If you’re interested in a deeper dive into the ideation, creation, and deployment of nanobiotechnology as weapons of biowarfare and spiritual warfare, you may find investing 1-hour of your time into the film Final Days, worth your time. (Dr. David Martin is featured throughout the film.)

Details of the EcoHealth Alliance DARPA Pitch and the deployment the SARS-CoV-2 pathogen can be found in What Happened in Wuhan. I strongly recommend reading COVID-19 is a Pandemic of mRNA Technology.

Proverbs 21: 6-7

A fortune made by a lying tongue is a fleeting vapor and a deadly snare.

The violence of the wicked will drag them away, for they refuse to do what is right.

The Kingston Report. TRUTH WINS.

Because You Can’t Vaccinate Against Nanotechnology

In the peer-review nanobiotechnolgy publications, it’s well established that new ‘pandemics’ are caused by nanobiotechnologies, not viruses. Because these disease-causing nanobiotechnologies mimic certain biological life forms, such as bacteria and parasites, early treatment with certain supplements and therapeutics have been shown to help resolve symptoms and restore wellness.

In my home, I use an advanced ionic air purifier, clinically proven to eliminate the biosynthetic pathogens that cause COVID-19, the flu, and other similar pathogens.

Use code KINGSTON to save $10 from Weston Scientific.

Ways to Support My Work

Mail: Karen Kingston/miFight Inc., 960 Postal Way #307, Vista, CA  92081

The Kingston Report is reader-supported.

Upgrade to paid

Consider becoming a paid subscriber to support me and my work.

Contact: I can be contacted via email at patriots@mifight.com.The Wellness Company - Be Well.

The Wellness Company offers scientifically researched and clinically proven immune support supplements, including Z-Shield and Spike Support. Use code KINGSTON at checkout and save 10% on supplements, services, and prescriptions. Order here.

Subscribe to The Kingston Report

By Karen Kingston

The Kingston Report is an evidence-based, med-legal analysis of mRNA technologies and the dangers of the rapidly growing synthetic biology industry.

https://karenkingston.substack.com/p/ecohealth-used-nanoparticles-to-create?publication_id=1103773&post_id=145901564&isFreemail=true&r=16ettj&triedRedirect=true

Reprinted from COURAGEOUS DISCOURSE - Innate and Adaptive Mechanisms of Immune Dysregulation with COVID-19 Vaccination

Systematic Review Finds Substantial Evidence

PETER A. MCCULLOUGH, MD, MPH

Serial injections of lipid nanoparticles laced with pseudouridinated mRNA coding for the Spike protein of a coronavirus sounds like a bad idea from the description. Now four years into the mass vaccination debacle, more manuscripts have emerged describing the broad and long-lasting effects of these injections on the human body.

Pallas performed a systematic review focusing on immune system dysregulation or “inflammatory signatures” left by the vaccines in the human body.

“Paradoxically, the results of this study show that COVID-19 vaccines may expose some people to an increased risk of immune dysregulation. This likelihood is confirmed by recent evidence from the published biomedical literature linking immune dysregulation, the spike effect of COVID-19 vaccines, and the temporal occurrence with the adverse effects caused. These findings are testable, not confounded by SARS-CoV-2 infection, concurrent or prior autoimmune diseases, or effects of host genetic background on susceptibility to reactogenicity. However, cases of systemic adverse reactions have been reported in patients with allergic diseases, such as asthma, hay fever, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, food allergies, and/or intolerances, who are potentially susceptible to COVID-19 and worsening of their chronic diseases after vaccination with BNT162b2, such as intestinal dysbiosis. Some reports posit the onset autoimmune diseases after vaccination ruling out that autoimmune conditions were diagnosed at baseline or recurred after vaccinations, including infections. In post-mortem investigations of post-vaccination deaths, the causal association was established, all sudden deaths should be disclosed and investigated to determine clear evidence about the death following COVID-19 vaccination.”

It should be no surprise that allergic dermatitis, mast cell activation syndrome, asthma, increased frequency of upper respiratory illnesses, and other syndromes consistent with immune system dysregulation occur after COVID-19 vaccination. Most of these syndromes should be expected after mRNA vaccination for influenza and respiratory syncytial virus.

Morlanes Pallás R. Innate and adaptative immune mechanisms of COVID-19 vaccines. Serious adverse events associated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: A systematic review. Vacunas. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacun.2024.01.001.

Please subscribe to Courageous Discourse as a paying ($5 monthly) or founder member so we can continue to bring you the truth.

Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH

President, McCullough Foundation

www.mcculloughfnd.org

Morlanes Pallás R. Innate and adaptative immune mechanisms of COVID-19 vaccines. Serious adverse events associated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: A systematic review. Vacunas. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacun.2024.01.001.

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/innate-and-adaptive-mechanisms-of?publication_id=1119676&post_id=145768951&isFreemail=true&r=16ettj&triedRedirect=true

Reprinted from TRIAL SITE NEWS - Pfizer RSV Vaccine Linked to Adverse Events/Pre-Term Birth Safety Signal in Pregnant Women—Urgent Follow Up Recommended

How safe is Pfizer’s respiratory syncytial virus known as RSVpreF or Abrysvo? Abdallah Alami, MSc, BSc, University of Ottaway (School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine), and colleagues designed a case series study adverse event (AE) reports submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database following RSVPreF immunization from September 1, 2023, to February 23, 2024. Uploaded to the preprint server medRxiv, the surveillance data included all AE reports submitted to VAERS for pregnant individuals following vaccination.  Using descriptive statistics to assess all AE reports with RSVPreF, including frequency, gestational age at vaccination, time to AE onset, and serious report proportions. The researchers utilized the Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), estimating the information component (IC) to identify disproportionate reporting of RSVPreF–event pairs.

It's important to note that this study outcome has not yet been peer-reviewed and published. Ideally, this finding gets vetted by peers for a comprehensive understanding of the output.

The Product

Pfizer’s RSVpreF (Abrysvo) was approved by the FDA in May 2023 for persons 60 years and above and by August 2023 for pregnant persons for two different uses:

  • Pregnant people

The only vaccine approved to protect infants from respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-associated lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) during pregnancy. It should be given as a single injection into the muscle between 32 and 36 weeks of pregnancy to protect infants from birth to 6 months of age. Common side effects in pregnant people include pain at the injection site, headache, muscle pain, and nausea.

  • Adults 60 and older

To prevent RSV-associated LRTD, The CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) officially recommended the vaccine for this use in June 2023. Common side effects in adults include fatigue, headache, pain at the injection site, and muscle pain.

Findings

The authors, report in VAERS 77 uploaded reports pertained to RSVPreF vaccination in pregnant individuals, with 42 (54.55%) classified as serious. The most reported non-pregnancy-specific AEs were headache, injection site erythema, and injection site pain.

Preterm birth was the most frequently reported pregnancy-specific AE, followed by preterm premature rupture of membranes, cesarean section, cervical dilatation, and hemorrhage during pregnancy.

The authors report in medRxiv that the median time from immunization to reported preterm birth was 3 days, with two-thirds of cases within a week.

Disproportionality analysis, a statistical method that compares the observed proportion of an adverse event for a specific drug to its expected proportion in a given set of data, is used to identify signals of disproportionate reporting (SDR) in adverse drug reactions (ADRs) spontaneous reporting (SR) databases. Disproportionality analysis is employed to identify whether SDR leads to regulatory action. This study pointed to a significant signal for various AEs, particularly highlighting preterm birth with an information component of 2.18 (95%CI, 1.54-2.63). This suggests that reports of preterm birth associated with RSVPreF vaccination occurred more frequently than statistically expected, and thus a concern. This is especially the case given the vulnerable nature of the cohort.

While the authors recognize that the “reported AEs were generally consistent with the safety profile observed in prelicensure studies, this study highlights ongoing concern about preterm birth among pregnant individuals following RSVPreF vaccination. Comprehensive longitudinal follow-up, including prospective pregnancy registries and infant follow-up studies, is urgently required.”

Lead Research/Investigator

  • Abdallah Alami, MSc, BSc, University of Ottaway (School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine); Corresponding Author

  • Santiago Perez-Lloret, MD, PhD, Consejo Nacional Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires

  • Donald R. Mattison, MD, MS, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa; Risk Sciences International

    https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/pfizer-rsv-vaccine-linked-to-adverse-eventspre-term-birth-safety-signal-in-pregnant-womenurgent-follow-up-recommended-966c9d64

Watch: VAERS Purposely ‘Throttling’ and Undercounting Reports of Deaths After COVID Shots

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaers-undercounting-deaths-after-covid-shots/

VAERS analyst Albert Benavides joined “The Defender In-Depth” this week to discuss evidence he’s gathered suggesting VAERS is undercounting COVID-19-related deaths and injuries among people of all ages.

by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D., The Defender

VAERS — the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System — is undercounting child deaths following COVID-19 vaccination and also the total number of reports of deaths and injuries among people of all ages following the vaccines, according to VAERS analyst and expert Albert Benavides.

Benavides, founder of VAERSAware.com, joined “The Defender In-Depth” this week to discuss these and other statistical anomalies in VAERS — and why the undercount may be occurring.

According to Benavides, VAERS — which is administered by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) — has access to more detailed and updated information than what is visible publicly and is “throttling” many reports.

‘More than double’ children’s deaths are ‘hiding’ in VAERS

Benavides told “The Defender In-Depth” that according to official VAERS figures as of May 31, “you’ll get 197 deaths officially” for people under age 18 following COVID-19 vaccination.

However, he said, his research shows that when looking at VAERS reports where the age is officially listed as “unknown,” child deaths total 538.

“So more than double the kid deaths are actually hiding in the unknown age bucket,” Benavides said.

According to Benavides, 3,000-5,000 reports relating to COVID-19 vaccines are added to VAERS monthly. He said he isolates the “unknown age” reports from each new monthly batch into a spreadsheet, “and then from there, I’ll go right to the deaths.”

He then reads the written summaries accompanying the reports, where the patient’s age is often listed, even if the “age” field indicates “unknown.”

“I’m a one-horse pony show myself, and I’m here running circles around this data,” Benavides said. “This is not difficult.” He noted that most VAERS reports are submitted electronically, and the metadata should be easy to review and process.

“You could easily go through there and find the missing stuff to populate,” he said. “You would think that somebody within the VAERS system would ethically populate the field. And they’re not.”

The Vaccine Safety Project

LEARN MORE

Benavides noted that VAERS maintains two versions of its database — but only one is public-facing. However, reports where the data are “cleaned up” or updates were submitted are not included in the public-facing data.

“The public one is the initial reports [and] only the initial report is made public,” Benavides said. “Whatever additional information they collect, that part stays for them internally as part of the same database. But we only get to see the initial report as is, with no cleanup at all.”

Benavides, who said he has experience submitting VAERS reports for family members, said follow-up emails are sent regularly requesting updated information from reporters.

“They have that information … they use it to append initial reports with follow-up data,” which are not made public, Benavides said. “They merge the data internally for them. But we only see the initial report that will be petrified in time.”

30% of VAERS COVID vaccine reports list ‘unknown’ age

Benavides referred to a paper he co-authored with evolutionary biologist Herve Seligmann, Ph.D., showing child reports have more missing ages in the VAERS age field by proportion or percentage compared to older cohorts — particularly reports involving children age 5 and younger.

“They have the … highest percentage of missing ages that were actually there in the summary narrative, and it’s almost on a perfect curve, on a perfect slope, as you go into the cohorts for the adolescents and into the adults and to the older people,” Benavides said.

Unknown age reports are not just found among children, Benavides said, noting that “30% of all COVID reports, [of] the 1.6 million COVID reports that we have in there, 30% have unknown age. So, it’s not just kids, it’s everybody. It’s everywhere.”

Benavides said he’s identified over 360,000 “unknown age” reports where the patient’s age was “documented in the narrative” accompanying the report.

This article was funded by critical thinkers like you.

The Defender is 100% reader-supported. No corporate sponsors. No paywalls. Our writers and editors rely on you to fund stories like this that mainstream media won’t write.

PLEASE DONATE TODAY

VAERS likely ‘not publishing all legitimate reports received’

At a congressional hearing in February, FDA and CDC officials claimed VAERS is not a fully trustworthy indicator of vaccine injuries and deaths because “numerous false reports” are submitted.

However, according to Benavides, most of the “unknown age” reports use “professional language” — an indication that “they were submitted by a hospital or an institution of some sort — or were initially filed with vaccine manufacturers.

“I think it’s difficult to file a false report,” Benavides said, noting there is a 4- to 6-week adjudication process following the submission of a VAERS report, to “determine that it’s not a duplicate or not a fake or false report and maybe [to] request additional information.”

Instead, Benavides said VAERS is likely not “publishing all legitimate reports received.” Benavides said he’s identified at least 32,000 deleted COVID-19 vaccine reports after initial publication, 1,100 of which involved deaths.

He said this is a disproportionate figure, compared to the 2% of overall reports that involve deaths.

“If only 2% of the reports are deaths … organically it should be the same type of proportion,” he said.

Benavides said he’s observed other anomalies in VAERS involving COVID-19 reports, noting that while 16% of overall COVID-19 reports do not list a U.S. state, 32% of COVID-19 death reports do not have a state listed.

Benavides also disputed claims included within many VAERS reports stating that follow-up with the reporter is not possible, to request clarifications or additional information.

“You have all the might of the intelligence of the CDC, FDA and, in addition, the manufacturer,” Benavides said. “I believe that you could probably find out who it was [that submitted the report] or get the information you’re seeking.”

He said there are deleted VAERS reports that state, “This is submitted by a contactable physician.”

Benavides described another practice he’s observed, “throttling, the purposeful delay of publishing reports” in VAERS. He noted one example where a death report was published in the database 927 days after receipt, “and they conveniently forgot to check … the death box.”

Benavides, who has recently participated in several live discussions on X Spaces with COVID-19 vaccine injury victims, referred to cases where people “filed reports and … either never had them published [or] were published and then later deleted,” unbeknownst to the reporters.

“That’s another form of throttling,” Benavides said.

Benavides said throttling, missing or incomplete reports “is no accident,” because under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, “they’re obligated, entrusted to maintain a pharmacovigilance system.”

“These are not just simple oversights. It’s with design that they’re doing [this], curating the reports of what we’re allowed to see and when we’re allowed to see it.”

Watch ‘The Defender In-Depth’ here:

Listen to the podcast on Spotify.

‘The Defender In-Depth’ airs on CHD.TV Wednesday at 10 a.m. ET/9 a.m. CT.

Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.

Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D., based in Athens, Greece, is a senior reporter for The Defender and part of the rotation of hosts for CHD.TV's "Good Morning CHD."

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please consider subscribing to The Defender or donating to Children’s Health Defense.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaers-undercounting-deaths-after-covid-shots/