Reprinted from Who is Robert Malone - Marxism: "You Will Own NOTHING and Be Happy" by Dr. Robert Malone

A friend just told me that Linked-in suspended him for posting my Monkeypox Substack article.  Others have written to me that basically anything I write will get someone banned from Linked-in just for re-posting - including the cartoons. Now, I am sure that many others who have criticized the government are also on the censored list. I am not alone.  I am also sure that this list is being generated by the US Government/Administrative state. That the list is growing to include those that are critical of these mRNA vaccines, those who advocate off-label drug use to treat COVID, US policy regarding the Russia/Ukraine conflict, and even the Biden administration. Mal-information, that which may be true but hurts the government narrative is enough to be a domestic terrorist.  It is enough to be permanently censored by the state-sponsored media, and I strongly suspect it will soon be enough to impact on your personal social credit and ESG ranking. And that social credit and ESG score ranking will impact on your ability to get loans and purchase goods and services.

The WEF ESG scoring system

We have all heard by now that ESG scores are based on more than just environment/carbon, but also “social”  scoring. You know, like social scoring system of the the CCP.

Who is Robert Malone is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Subscribe now

The government of the People's Republic of China has developed a Social Credit System, which is a national credit rating which is used to blacklist corporations and individuals who have transgressed against CCP mandates and guidelines. It is basically an extension of the existing financial credit rating system in China. Many believe that it “oversteps the rule of law and infringes the legal rights of residents and organizations, especially the right to reputation, the right to privacy as well as personal dignity, and that the system may be a tool for comprehensive government surveillance and for suppression of dissent from the Chinese Communist Party” (Wiki).

The ESG system developed by the World Economic Forum (WEF) and now implemented by all of the large institutional investment transnational corporations (such as Blackrock, Vanguard and State Street) has incorporated elements of the Chinese Social Credit system.  The use of ESG scores has now swept the corporate world, and a good score is necessary to obtain large amounts of capital or to obtain government contracts (in some countries.)

The World Economic Forum (WEF) is an international non-governmental and lobbying organization…. The foundation, which is mostly funded by its 1,000 member companies – typically global enterprises with more than five billion US dollars in turnover – as well as public subsidies, views its own mission as "improving the state of the world by engaging business, political, academic, and other leaders of society to shape global, regional, and industry agendas" (Wiki).

From the World Economic Forum Website:

Read this list carefully and think. This is another tool for transnational corporation managers to determine who will be the winners and losers - not based on economic indicators but on social determinants. Not capitalism. The creation of goods and wealth which typically drives corporate growth and valuation is literally not a consideration. Think about that hard. In the long term, ESG scores to determine credit worthiness will fail.

Social scoring criteria are subjective and influenced by the political and social objectives and goals of individuals and organizations. In a capitalist society, such a system does not belong in the realm of determining which businesses will allowed to be successful at a global level. ESG scores seem suspiciously akin to that failed political system known as Marxism.

• From the WEF: “You Will Own NOTHING and Be Happy”

• Marxism (Definition): “The abolition of private property.”

Marxism (simplified) is a political and economic theory where the goal of a society has no class structure. Where every person within the society works for a common good, and class struggle is theoretically gone. Marxism can be summed up in a single sentence “the abolition of private property.” Now, when people no longer have ownership, they no longer have an interest in the system. They have no personal motivation to improve the situation, because improvement will not benefit themselves. This is why Marxism always fails.

Stakeholder capitalism and ESG

It is fascinating to read the WEF manual on stakeholder Capitalism measurement. What IMMEDIATELY becomes apparent is the the desire to increase profit or wealth is NOT included in the metrics. From the “Measuring Stakeholder Capitalism: Towards Common Metrics and Consistent Reporting of Sustainable Value Creation” WEF manual, published 2020.

The WEF and its members uses Stakeholder capitalism to justify ESG scores. It is the WEF’s mission to define what a “good” business is, using the four pillars above.

Stakeholder capitalism is just another word for the implementation of Marxism. The graphic from the WEF below shows that the ESG system is the escalating of “stakeholder activism, with transparency and responsiveness of ESG investors that will impact on a company’s valuation. This is absolutely illogical in a capitalist economic system. What should grow valuation is short and long term growth.

ESG scores are also being applied to governments, and this is driving large-scale investments towards those countries. Using environmental, social and governance - including political affiliations to determine which nations are worthy of transnational attention, is truly a draconian form of political control by the WEF and the large financial interests which it represents.

Now overlay all of these ideas on the individual. The proposed global digital IDs (passports), which can be linked to health, vaccines, carbon footprint, financial scores, political donations, credit scores, school records, genetics, purchasing history, etc. Just take the WEF ESG list and apply it your own life. This is clearly where ESG scores are heading. It is just a matter of time.

In response to the threat to fundamental liberty, personal autonomy and national sovereignty which the WEF and its Marxist centralized global government agenda pose, many people believe that the way forward is to build parallel economies. An economy and an internet environment that eschews censorship, ESG scores, the global elites and marxist policies that are creeping into world politics an governance. Many believe that the US Federal government has been coopted - and that it is state’s rights that can help free the USA from creeping Marxist strangulation by the global elites.

These controlling interests are the deciders what is allowed on the internet, what corporations are “moral” (as they define it) enough for funding ,and advocating for a world governance and censorship. Moving forward, I believe there will be more and more opportunities to have parallel economic opportunities. At this point in time, I recommend use of GETTR, Truth Social, Signal, Proton Mail, Brave, local credit unions, local Amish shops, local goods, and try to build new ways to protect our financial and physical assets. I am hopeful that these opportunities will only grow. I do not buy into the Marxist ideal of “own nothing and be happy”. It has not worked in the past, and it will not work in the future.

This is where we are. It needs to stop. We need to stop it.

It is our actions that define us, and at this moment in time, we need action.

Who is Robert Malone is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Subscribe now

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/marxism-you-will-own-nothing-and

Reprinted from Gateway Pundit - BOMBSHELL: Recent Conference Uncovered Between Government Entities (FBI, DOJ, CISA, and EAC) with Liberal Groups By Joe Hoft

PJ Media released a bombshell report yesterday showing collusion between the US government (the FBI, DOJ, EAC, and CISA), with progressive groups and individuals fueled by progressive money related to US elections (like the Elections Group, CTCL, and Brennan Center), along with individuals from US corporations like Microsoft.  (Also, an individual working for Maricopa County, Arizona was present.)

J. Christian Adams at PJ Media reported the following yesterday:

A strange constellation has emerged through public records requests of coordination between progressive funders, federal authorities, corporations, state election officials, and leftist organizations.

Freedom of information requests have uncovered oddball and opaque relationships between some state election officials, federal officials, corporations, progressive activists, and those trying to influence the conduct of those same election officials. These relationships extend to junkets that include baseball games, travel, and even data exchanges between state officials and outside progressive groups.

TRENDING: Pima County Arizona Democratic Party: "F*ck the 4th"

The story begins with a series of freedom of information act requests aimed at a number of states to see if any election officials are tempted to apply for now-illegal money from the Mark Zuckerberg-funded Center for Technology and Civic Life. Such grants and the wild expenditures of these funds altered the course of the 2020 election. (Read The Real Kraken, What Really Happened to Donald Trump in the 2020 Election at PJ Media.)

The FOIAs were submitted by the Public Interest Legal Foundation—with which I am associated—and were aimed broadly at election officials across the United States.

While no election official in a state that now prohibits private funding of elections has applied for new funding, something stranger, and more dangerous has emerged from the public information requests.

In one email, we find that the Democracy Fund—a hyper-funded progressive money source—is organizing state officials and third parties to discuss election administration…

…No conservative or right-of-center groups are invited.

From the above, you can see members of government agencies including the FBI, DOJ, EAC and CISA.  These individuals and entities are at a function with progressives from the Democracy Fund, the CTCL and corporations like Microsoft.

We know the FBI and DOJ looked the other way in November of 2020 when the election was stolen for Joe Biden.  This may have been the biggest sin of the election.  The FBI, CISA, and other government bodies came out before and after the 2020 Election announcing the Election was the most secure ever.

The CTCL was a non-profit doling out Zuckerbucks money across the country.  Nearly half a billion was given to states and localities before the election for what, we really don’t know.

ERIC is now used in 31 states as the mechanism to maintain voter rolls.  What The Gatewaypundit (TGP) found was that the system hoards names but rarely removes names from rolls building a pile of excess names across the country potentially available to bad actors who can get to them during elections to manufacture votes.

The Elections Group’s Jennifer Morrell was all over the place before, during, and after the 2020 Election, showing up at parties with Dominion Voting systems employees, at the State Farm Arena during the election, and after the election in Arizona at the audit there.

Liz Howard from the Brennan Center was also all over the place before the 2020 Election and after.  She even appeared at an event at the UN before the 2020 Election to discuss US Elections.

Microsoft employees were present at the meeting noted by PJ Media above as well as members of the government body, the Election Assistance Commission (EAC).  This government entity also appears to have been taken over by left-wing radicals.

Even one individual with a Maricopa County email address was present at the above event.

What was really going on in Colorado a month ago?  

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/07/bombshell-foia-requests-unearth-recent-collusion-government-fbi-doj-cisa-eac-liberal-groups-eric-ctcl-elections-group-corporations-like-microsoft-go/

Reprinted from Children's Health Defense - U.S. Orders 2.5 Million More Monkeypox Vaccine Doses, as CDC Looks to Expand Vaccine for Kids

The Biden administration today said it ordered 2.5 million more doses of Bavarian Nordic’s Jynneos monkeypox vaccine, bringing the total vaccine doses to be delivered in 2022 and 2023 to more than 4 million.

The news followed Tuesday’s announcement of the first phase of the U.S. government’s “national monkey vaccine strategy,” which will expand testing capabilities and make Bavarian Nordic’s Jynneos vaccines readily available to anyone exposed to the virus.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) said the government’s “enhanced” nationwide strategy “will vaccinate and protect those at-risk of monkeypox,” as well as provide guidance to communities on how to respond to outbreaks.

“We are focused on making sure the public and healthcare providers are aware of the risks posed by monkeypox and that there are steps they can take — through seeking testing, vaccines and treatments — to stay healthy and stop the spread,” said Dr. Rochelle Walensky, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

As part of the strategy, the CDC and HHS began shipping tests to five major laboratory companies across the country: Aegis Science, Labcorp, Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Quest Diagnostics and Sonic Healthcare.

The government, which for months has been buying more Jynneos doses to add to the national stockpile, is now distributing the vaccine. It’s currently making available 296,000 doses and expects to roll out 750,000 doses over the summer, with an additional 500,000 doses produced and released in the fall — for a total of 1.6 million doses this year.

The Jynneos vaccine is licensed for use in adults and is considered safer than Emergent BioSolutions Inc.’s ACAM2000 smallpox vaccine, which also can be used against monkeypox, the HHS said.

The vaccine will be made available to individuals “with confirmed and presumed monkeypox exposures,” said the HHS.

“This includes those who had close physical contact with someone diagnosed with monkeypox, those who know their sexual partner was diagnosed with monkeypox, and men who have sex with men who have recently had multiple sex partners in a venue where there was known to be monkeypox or in an area where monkeypox is spreading.”

Health officials seeking to expand use of monkeypox vaccine for kids, despite lack of safety data

U.S. health officials also are seeking to expand use of the monkeypox vaccine for children, Bloomberg reported.

The CDC is developing a protocol aimed at allowing use of the Jynneos vaccine in children “should cases in children occur,” Kristen Nordlund, a CDC spokesperson, said in an email to Bloomberg.

“I’m concerned about sustained transmission because it would suggest that the virus is establishing itself, and it could move into high-risk groups, including children, the immunocompromised, and pregnant women,” Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the World Health Organization (WHO) said in a Wednesday press briefing.

“We’re starting to see this with several children already infected,” he added.

There have been 350 cases so far of monkeypox in the U.S. — all adults — according to the CDC. The agency confirmed 5,115 cases worldwide.

The WHO confirmed two cases in children in the U.K. and said Wednesday it is following up on reports of cases in children in Spain and France.

No safety trials have been done in children for the Jynneos vaccine as of yet, partly because clinical research involving participants under the age of 18 must pose no more than “minimal risk” to children, which can be difficult for vaccine manufacturers to argue.

Commenting on the CDC’s actions, Dr. Meryl Nass, a member of the Children’s Health Defense scientific advisory committee, told The Defender, “It’s kind of extraordinary that they want to vaccinate everyone in the country before knowing what the safety issues are.”

Nass, an internist and biological warfare epidemiologist, said, “We don’t actually know” if the Jynneos vaccine prevents monkeypox in humans because it was developed as a smallpox vaccine, and prevention studies have been conducted using only animals.

“It is hard to believe that the [U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)] gave this vaccine a license when you read the FDA reviewers’ comments in their own report,” Nass wrote in her June 23 substack newsletter.

“They could not test the vaccine for efficacy against smallpox because there is no smallpox, nor against monkeypox, because the disease is so rare,” Nass wrote. “So the FDA relied on neutralizing antibody titers.”

At the same time, the FDA admitted there is no established correlate of protection, Nass said.

“This means that there is no evidence that the titers represent actual immunity to infection,” Nass wrote. “So FDA relied on animal studies to simply guess the vaccine might be effective in humans.”

According to the FDA, the effectiveness of Jynneos for the prevention of monkeypox is “inferred from the antibody responses in the smallpox clinical study participants and from studies in non-human primates that showed protection of animals vaccinated with Jynneos who were exposed to the monkeypox virus.”

Jynneos, a replication-deficient live Vaccinia virus vaccine, was licensed in the U.S. in 2019, by the FDA for use in individuals 18 and over considered to be at high risk for smallpox or monkeypox.

In 2021, the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) voted to recommend Jynneos as a safer alternative to the ACAM2000 vaccine because of ACAM2000’s propensity to cause serious adverse effects, including myocarditis and pericarditis — i.e., inflammation of the heart.

However, Nass noted, Jynneos also was linked to heart inflammation, according to the FDA licensure review of the Jynneos smallpox-monkeypox vaccine which reported:

“Up to 18.4% of subjects in 2 studies developed post-vaccination elevation of troponin [a cardiac muscle enzyme signifying cardiac damage]. However, all of these troponin elevations were asymptomatic and without a clinically associated event or other sign of myopericarditis.”

These higher levels of troponin were not studied further, and the reviewers admitted they did not know if the Jynneos vaccine caused myocarditis, Nass said.

The Jynneos manufacturers said they would conduct an “observational, post-marketing study” in which they would “collect data on cardiac events that occur and are assessed as a routine part of medical care.”

But myocarditis — particularly asymptomatic forms of myocarditis that lack outer signs of the condition — could fly under the radar of the “routine part of medical care,” noted Nass.

The manufacturers would need to test for heightened troponin levels — something that is not typically done in “routine” check-ups.

The authors of a 2015 study reported evidence of heart injury following vaccination in a sample of 1,445 individuals who received a smallpox or trivalent influenza vaccine.

They found that chest pain, shortness of breath and/or palpitations occurred in 10.6% of those who received the smallpox vaccine SPX-vaccinees and 2.6% of those who received the trivalent influenza vaccine within 30 days of immunization.

Additionally, the study authors reported levels more than double the upper limit of troponin — a protein that flags cardiac injury — in 31 of the individuals who received the smallpox vaccine.

“Passive surveillance significantly underestimates the true incidence of myocarditis/pericarditis after smallpox immunization,” they concluded.

The authors added:

“Evidence of subclinical transient cardiac muscle injury post-vaccine immunization is a finding that requires further study to include long-term outcomes surveillance. Active safety surveillance is needed to identify adverse events that are not well understood or previously recognized.”

Subscribe to The Defender - It’s Free

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/united-states-monkeypox-vaccine-cdc-kids/?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=07ea062a-85ab-42bd-bf24-9357236f220a

Reprinted from THE EXPOSE - Dr. Vernon Coleman: We Have Six Months of Freedom Left BY RHODA WILSON

In April 2022, I made a video in which I predicted that we had eight months of freedom left.

I stand by the timing.

We now have six months left – and that takes us until Christmas 2022.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

EMAIL ADDRESS

SUBSCRIBE

Follow The Exposé’s Official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here

By Dr. Vernon Coleman

I’m not suggesting that we’re all suddenly going to die by Christmas.

What I am suggesting (and this is in some ways scarier) is that things are now moving so fast that unless we stand up and defend ourselves we will be too far along the road towards an existence built around the principles of social credit; too far along to stop progress towards the Great Reset.

Everywhere you look there is evidence showing just how fast the conspirators are making progress.

First, look at the global economy.

We are all heading not just for a recession but for a deep, long depression that will rival anything that took place in the 1930s.

Barbados, Lebanon and Sri Lanka have all gone bankrupt. As, of course, has Argentina. Government corruption (enjoyed by politicians and bureaucrats) is largely responsible. Just look at the corruption in the UK, for example.

Things are so bad in Sri Lanka (long independent for food supplies) that farmers can no longer afford to buy seeds. The country is begging for food.

In 2020, the global debt was $220 trillion. It has now risen to $300 trillion – that’s three and a half times global GDP.

Governments everywhere are going to have push up interest rates to try to keep inflation down. And when they do that the cost of servicing all that debt is going to bankrupt millions, destroy thousands of companies and put nations in peril. No country on earth is immune. Both the UK and the USA could go into default. Services are going to have to be cut. Pensions and other payments will have to be halted.

Spending on health and education will be slashed as more and more money goes on buying bombs for the Ukraine war. The cost of rebuilding Ukraine will probably be close to a trillion dollars. Taxpayers are going to be expected to find the money – most of which will doubtless be stolen. And, as I predicted many weeks ago, western governments are preparing for war with Russia. NATO is preparing for war. And the head of the British armed forces says we must be ready for war. The only people who will gain will be the arms companies.

Everywhere you look there is economic chaos.

In China they are talking of maintaining absurd zero covid policies for five years while they tighten up the social credit rules. Mass testing will continue and travel curbs will become tougher for those whose social credit scores are low.

It’s been deliberately created. But it’s still chaos. Pakistan and Argentina have borrowed huge amounts of money from the International Monetary Fund. Neither will ever pay back their debts. The IMF holds huge debts and effectively controls many countries – on its way to a role in the new World Government.

The same things are happening everywhere in the world. Is that a coincidence? Of course it isn’t. It’s all deliberate.

What no one mentions is that when economies crash the number of people dying always soars. People cannot afford to eat properly and nor can they afford to keep warm. Undertakers and florists are the only businesses which can expect boom times ahead.

Local councils are heading for bankruptcy. Services are going to be cut – or slashed to protect those massive pensions paid to former chief executives and other overpaid staff. Your local library may close. Swimming pools and leisure centres are for the chop. How long will bin collections continue? How long will schools stay open? Jobs will have to be cut.

The collapse of the stock market is threatening pensions everywhere. Stock markets are already about where they were in the 1990s. If the markets crash still further then the value of pensions will also fall. Very few people are aware just how precarious their futures are.

As the cost of food and fuel and heating soars so there will be more and more strikes. Doctors want a 30% rise. A strike or a massive pay rise will destroy what’s left of the failed NHS.

Health care is no longer available in the UK.

Even before there was talk of strikes, doctors were resigning en masse in their 50s. Why? Because they can no longer cope with the regulations and red tape introduced by the Government and the General Medical Council. The GMC’s hated revalidation scheme is utter lunacy. Doctors spend so much of their time on form filling that they have little or no time left for patients. They find no joy in their work.

Dentists are retiring early too because of the red tape. Dentists work all day pulling and filling teeth and then routinely have to work another two or three hours filling in forms to satisfy the bureaucrats.

Meanwhile, the UK is rudderless, effectively without a government, and everything is crumbling.

Would anyone deny that our transport systems are a mess?

There is constant talk among millennial liberals of a four day week and the importance of work-life balance. But someone has to be prepared to work if the country is to be made to work. And most under 40s have no idea just how close we are to the edge of a cliff. There are nearly 1.5 million vacant jobs in the UK. And over five million people at home on benefits which the country cannot afford.

Farms everywhere are struggling with new regulations. Young people don’t want to work on farms because the work is too hard. In the UK, the average age for farmers is 59. The average hill farmer grossed £15,000 last year. They’d have been better off on benefits. An astonishing four million European farms have shut in recent years – encouraged by EU regulations designed to destroy farming and make the way for laboratory food.

It’s not surprising that food shortages are coming very fast. Within the EU there is already talk of food rationing. Food and fuel rationing are inevitable. And they’ll be controlled by an App. Electricity supplies will be controlled with the smart meters so many idiots have in their homes.

Cash is being demonised and many shops now refuse to accept cash. Citizens are forced to do everything via an App. Schools are introducing social credit points schemes to control students. We are only a few months away from a society which will be just as oppressive as China’s.

And the media lies and suppression of the truth continues.

I have been banned from all mainstream media for two and a half years now. As I explained the other day, I was even silenced when I tried to appear on internet radio. I have a website. But for how long before that is taken down?

I cannot see any of it because I’m banned from accessing all social media but I hear that social media is now full of fake news (controlled by governments and secret services), hate speech (put there by governments and secret services), extremism (put there by governments and secret services), trolling (organised by governments and secret services) and bullying (run by governments and secret services. The big search engines and internet sites belong to the conspirators just as much as the mainstream media.

Too many people accept it all without a murmur.

The collective silence will be our undoing.

They are picking us off one at a time.

I estimate that we’ve got six months of freedom left unless we fight this war with more determination.

And if you think I’m exaggerating look back over the last two years. I’ve predicted everything that has happened. My old videos are still available (for the moment) on this website.

Look at a few of the old videos and you’ll soon see why I am the most banned doctor in the world.

The truth is the one thing the conspirators fear. To them the truth is as deadly as sunshine and garlic are to vampires.

https://expose-news.com/2022/07/02/we-have-six-months-of-freedom-left/

Reprinted from THE EXPOSE - The Suicide of Europe: Irish Independence vs African Independence BY RHODA WILSON

Mass migration is not, as it seems, an organic emanation of humanity from poor countries, but a calculated project to repopulate the territory of the declining West, with racism its chief instrument, wrote John Waters.

In a two-part series titled ‘Europe’s Death Rattle’, John Waters explores mass migration with reference to Stephen Smith’s book ‘The Scramble for Europe: Young Africa on its way to the Old Continent’.

Part I discusses – as the culmination of a long-time plan – a global calamity of food scarcity, due to Covid measures and ‘sanctions’, which will cause record numbers of mainly African migrants to enter Europe seeking food.

As Waters’ articles are longer than most would read in one sitting, we are breaking Part II, headed ‘Open Borders, Shut Mouths’, into shorter sections and publishing them as a series titled ‘The Suicide of Europe’. This article is the fifth in our series. 

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

EMAIL ADDRESS

SUBSCRIBE

Follow The Exposé’s Official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here

By John Waters

Irish independence vs African independence

Another of the many ironies for Ireland is that we continue to be an emigrating culture, so that, these days, as already noted, Irish emigrants and African immigrants cross paths at Dublin airport: Until the present year, we have been shedding almost as many natives as there were aliens arriving, though 2022 looks set to reverse that slight imbalance.

Meanwhile, the fact that our ancestors were forced by genocidal famines to seek a life elsewhere, and therefore went to Britain and US to build roads and bridges and skyscrapers, is used to suggest that we have no option now but to open our borders and shut our mouths. 

What nobody says is that the departures of such people was one of the primary factors in the failure of Ireland to become independent and make its way in the world by its own lights. Now, we learn that we are part of the ‘white’ world, as taunts of ‘white supremacy’ and ‘white privilege,’ issue — almost invariably, though not exclusively — from the mouths of people whose faces are themselves conspicuous by their paleness.

The comparisons to be pointed to between Ireland and many African countries are legion. The failure of Africa’s postcolonial states has been widely discussed in the academia of the West. But what we understand from this, as Stephen Smith notes in his book, purely concerns what Africa lacks: good governance, sound fiscal practice, and infrastructure — it tells us what Africa is not. But we know almost nothing of what Africa is, and why and how it has been able to survive in a sort of independence for 60 years. Its ‘lack of institutional capacity’, in World Bank parlance, remains as though a profound mystery to Western observers.

One problem, undoubtedly, is that, because the colonial state was by definition extrinsic, the colonised peoples came to see government as an extraneous phenomenon. All power resided in the metropole, to which all resources were promised and destined, including human resources in times of war. ‘In the eyes of many Africans,’ writes Smith, ‘this foreignness of the state — its extraneous character — translated into a governance that was arbitrary and alienating.’

This raises ominous possibilities: That, emerging from their dysfunctional continent to arrive in the metropole, Africans feel they have, in a sense, arrived at the centre of their own polis. What is foreign to them is the only ‘core’ their homelands possess. That is what they have been taught by the ancestors of present-day Europeans: that they are not African, but British, French, et cetera, from which they naturally adduce that Europe owes them something, at the very least a living.

Added to that they have a smattering of knowledge of Woke concepts like ‘equality’ — which seem to suggest further categories of entitlement — and the protection of the United Nations, which makes each migrant a kind of mobile jurisdiction of international law, attracting protections and rights which far exceed those of many of the current inhabitants of their chosen new European homelands. This too is a recipe for disaster.

Colonialism, bequeathing to the mentality of modern Africans an odd legacy of attitudes — hostile and submissive, acrimonious and deferential — had the paradoxical effect of empowering the side-lined categories in Africa’s prior native gerontocracies — in particular women and the young. For Africa’s powerful gerontocracy, Smith writes, quoting Nicolas Argenti, the era of the Whites became ‘the era of insolence,’ when children, ‘their mouths on fire,’ emerged from a long silence. In other words, colonialism already carried the seeds of what is nowadays called Cultural Marxism: the colonisers planted the seeds of their own future destruction.

On arriving in Ireland, then, such wayfarers, imagine themselves to have arrived in the ‘White World’, whereas they have, in fact, arrived in a post-colonial outpost not all that unlike the place they left behind. 

Colonies’ Concessions

Ireland shares not just the essence of the African experience but also many of its pathologies. Smith cites the American anthropologist Rebecca Hardin on the matter of ‘concessions’ — formal legal arrangements by which foreign actors are enabled to manage and exploit land or other natural resources of former colonies, which have long been a feature of Irish ‘economic’ policy. The ‘beauty’ of these arrangements, he explains, is that they not only satisfy rent-seeking states but even better, reinforce the sovereign power of such, despite the supplicant states’ inability to exploit their own resources themselves. This phenomenon of ‘concessions’ has been an unnamed and unacknowledged feature of Irish ‘development’ policy since the 1960s, with massive tranches of multiple natural resources being sold for a song to foreign interests.  

Today, the breadth of what our political class has been selling off is imaginative indeed; they sell, in effect, the very essence of Ireland: its resources, yes, but more so its values, culture, uniqueness, weather, laws, constitution, natural rights, landscape, particularities, citizens’ rights, citizenship, passports. The intake by stealth over the past two decades of hundreds of thousands of outsiders is yet another example of such concession-granting: the transnational tech and chemical corporations from which the Irish political class obtains its lifeline trickle of financial run-off, need low-cost labour to allow their business models operate to maximum efficiency. Many of these companies — which were supposed to hire Irish workers — are now overwhelmingly staffed by imported labour.

Smith’s description, intended as a sketch of African political reality, provides another unwitting but devastating insight into modern Ireland:

‘What is fascinating in this political alchemy is that it transmutes incapacity into profits, or base metal into gold: the less the state can act on its own, the more it has to offer to external partners. They stand-in for the state and pay it recognition rights — tribute.’  This, in under 50 words, amounts to a precise summation of Irish industrial policy since the early 1970s. 

The charge of ‘racism’ is not merely disingenuous and utterly destructive of sense and reason — it is also a projection. Those who orchestrate the replacement of the European population are engaged in an unprecedented exercise in ethnic cleansing, but they conceal this behind a shield of misappropriated history and profoundly dishonest sleights-of-hand. 

Drawing its energy from historical acts of inhumanity — almost invariably resulting from the colonial incursions of European settlers in Africa and the Americas — the word ‘racism’ has legitimately acquired a profoundly toxic power. Themselves arguably the most appropriate candidates for such a designation, these malevolent manipulators seek to achieve the same outcome as the long-gone adventurers who first gave the term life, while dousing themselves in altruistic sanctimony.

About the Author

John Waters was a journalist, magazine editor and columnist specialising in raising unpopular issues of public importance.  He left The Irish Times after 24 years in 2014 and drew the blinds fully on Irish journalism a year later.

Since then, his articles have appeared in publications such as First Things, frontpagemag.com, The Spectator, and The Spectator USA. He has published ten books, the latest, Give Us Back the Bad Roads (2018), being a reflection on the cultural disintegration of Ireland since 1990, in the form of a letter to his late father. 

The above is an extract from his article ‘Europe’s death rattle, Part II’.  You can read Part I HERE.  Follow John Waters’ work by subscribing to his Substack HERE.

Featured image sources: British Empire, New World Encylopedia and Create Debate

Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

https://expose-news.com/2022/07/02/irish-independence-vs-african-independence/

Reprinted from THE EXPOSE - The Vaccines Damage Fertility: How Anti-Human Sentiment Has Enabled This Wholesale Attack on Life Itself BY RHODA WILSON

Given everything we know about the pandemic – that Covid is eminently treatable, the vaccines are neither safe nor effective, millions have been injured as a direct result – why is the vaccine roll-out being allowed to continue?

More to the point, why were vaccines even rolled out in the first place?

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

EMAIL ADDRESS

SUBSCRIBE

Follow The Exposé’s Official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here

By Dr. Tess Lawrie

There are many theories, ranging from the sinister to the plain venal. One of these is that a global elite believes that the planet is overcrowded and has implemented the pandemic and associated vaccine roll-out as part of a depopulation agenda.

It sounds the stuff of movies, and yet there is a precedent. As Dr Andrew Wakefield’s poignant new documentary, Infertility: A Diabolical Agenda, explains, the World Health Organisation spent many years researching and developing vaccines that would render recipients infertile. This line of research came from concern that populations were increasing at an unsustainable rate – and as the documentary reveals, the WHO apparently saw fit to implement its infertility vaccines without the informed consent of the women and girls who received them.

If you haven’t already, please do watch the documentary and share with others so that we can start discussing these matters together and in the open.

Many concerns have been raised over the impact of Covid-19 vaccines on fertility. The original Pfizer biodistribution studies (English translation here) reveal that the lipid nanoparticle (LNP) used to encapsulate the mRNA does not remain at the injection site as stated, but travels to major organs including the spleen, liver, adrenal glands, the testes and the ovaries.

What is the impact of having toxic LNP accumulate in the reproductive organs? That’s the problem with inadequately tested medical interventions: we have no idea. However, data regarding reproductive health and fertility continue to mount.

Now, a new peer-reviewed study, accepted for publication in the journal Andrology, reveals the Covid-19 vaccines are harming male fertility.

In this study, researchers analysed samples from three sperm banks in Israel: they evaluated samples before vaccination which served as the baseline control, followed by samples taken periodically for about five months after donors received their second dose of the Pfizer vaccine.

About three months after the second Pfizer dose, sperm concentration had reduced by 15.4%. There was also a percentage change reduction of 22.1% in sperm motility. This is significant: both of these indicators would reduce the chance of sperm fertilising an egg.

Subsequent testing found that donors generally recovered (or so the authors state: the figures in the study indicate that levels were still lower than the pre-vaccination baseline).

However, as Dr Byram Bridle points out in his excellent post on this study, the authors had made an assumption that the donors would never need more than two shots to be fully vaccinated. In the paper they define ‘vaccine completion’ at seven days after the second shot. Since the study, those donors will have been offered a third shot, maybe even a fourth. No studies have been done looking into the consequences on male fertility beyond two vaccine doses. If a Covid-19 vaccination program involves being vaccinated every six months, as it does in many countries, what happens to male fertility then?

Again, we don’t know – there is no long-term fertility data. But it is clearly possible that sperm is adversely affected with each vaccination.

At this point, one has to wonder what it will take for regulatory bodies to halt the Covid-19 vaccination program worldwide. The WHO’s VigiAccess database holds a growing list of adverse events in relation to reproductive health and fertility, including 5,726 spontaneous abortions, 501 foetal deaths, 208 stillbirths, plus reports of testicular swelling, sexual dysfunction and many other conditions.

Emerging data also indicate significant declines in birth rates since the vaccine roll-outs. While correlation does not equal causation, the declines in combination with high numbers of miscarriages and stillbirths reported to pharmacovigilance databases, are enough to warrant investigation.

Why is the WHO not investigating this?

Whether you believe this is part of a conscious depopulation agenda, or the devastating side effect of untested vaccine technology, clearly the regulators and their big pharma paymasters feel that these alarming findings are not sufficient to halt the vaccine roll-out.

Again, why is that? Plenty of opportunity for speculation here, but I have a theory.

It seems to me that materialism as a paradigm drives this entire exercise. In this paradigm, humans are no more than passive consumers: a drain on this planet and its resources. If one takes this point of view, it is not much of a leap of logic to then surmise that perhaps it wouldn’t be such a bad thing if birth rates did decline.

This belief may not be conscious, but it would certainly contribute to the blatant lack of care about diminishing fertility. It is indicative of a worrying disregard for life itself, and a brutish diminishing of what it means to be human. This reductive perspective has infiltrated so much of our culture: we see it everywhere and it can infect our own thinking.

We need to call these regulators to account – but we also need to ensure we ourselves do not fall for the lie that humanity is nothing more than a scourge on this planet. Instead, we can remember who we are: creative, intelligent, inspired beings with the capacity to dream up brilliant solutions to complex problems, to care for our planet and each other.

Rather than passive consumers, we are active participants in the glorious web of life, and human fertility is to be treasured as the miracle that it is. If there is even the hint of a medical intervention damaging people’s fertility it must be halted. The vaccines must be halted. In the meantime, no more injections for healthy people. Until we can know they are completely safe, #NoMoreInjections.

Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

https://expose-news.com/2022/07/02/the-vaccines-damage-fertility/

Reprinted from THE EXPOSE - Face Masks Are Ineffective and Do Not Work, They Have Never Worked BY RHODA WILSON

The case rate curves for two Californian counties – Alameda County, with an indoor mask mandate, and Contra Costa County, with no indoor mask mandate – are near-identical. Dr. Paul Alexander highlighted the comparison of data from the two Bay Area counties that clearly shows the measure imposed on populations is ineffective and does not work. “Covid [face] masks never ever worked and harmed populations,” he wrote.

Dr. Paul Alexander has expertise in teaching epidemiology, evidence-based medicine, and research methodology. He is a former Assistant Professor at McMaster University in evidence-based medicine, a former Covid Pandemic evidence-synthesis advisor to WHO-PAHO and a former Senior Advisor to Covid Pandemic policy in the US government, Health and Human Services.  In 2008 he worked at WHO as a Regional Specialist/Epidemiologist in Europe’s Regional Office in Denmark.

In early June, during an uptick in covid cases, Alameda County was the only Bay Area county to bring back an indoor mask mandate “to limit the impact of a prolonged wave,” according to county Health Officer Dr. Nicholas Moss.  But regional case data provides no discernible evidence that the rule, which was lifted on 25 June, succeeded at that goal.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

EMAIL ADDRESS

SUBSCRIBE

Follow The Exposé’s Official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here

By Dr. Paul Alexander

The case rate curves for Alameda and Contra Costa counties are near-identical. Because the neighbouring counties are similar in so many respects, if masking policy had an impact on pandemic outcomes, one would expect to see some sort of discrepancy in the graph.

Do mask mandates work? Bay Area Covid data from June says no, SFGATE, 29 June 2022

Comparing Covid-19 cases rates in Alameda County, which instituted an indoor mask mandate, and neighbouring Contra Costa County, which did not mandate masks indoors. Case rates are identical. No difference. In fact, Contra Costa appears lower.

This matches the many papers I have written showing that Covid masks are ineffective and even harmful (More than 150 Comparative Studies and Articles on Mask Ineffectiveness and Harms).

Do mask mandates work? Bay Area Covid data from June says no, SFGATE, 29 June 2022

The graphs below compare Alameda County’s seven-day average case rate from the past two months to rates in neighbouring Contra Costa, Santa Clara and San Francisco counties. Contra Costa and Santa Clara, in particular, are natural comparisons to Alameda, because they have similar vaccination rates and demographic data. San Francisco, on the other side of the bay, provides an additional point of reference. All data comes from the California Department of Public Health.

San Francisco and Santa Clara had higher case rates than Alameda County throughout the current surge, including pre-mask mandate. Once the mandate was introduced, the three counties all followed the same trend line, casting doubt on whether the mask mandate did anything to curb transmission at the community level.

“Mask mandates may create a false sense of reassurance to those who truly need the extra protection,” Noble said in April. “The severely immunocompromised person … should be using an N95 in crowded spaces when viral prevalence is high. They should not opt for a cloth or surgical mask because other people around them are masked and therefore assume it is ‘safe enough’ to avoid the tight-fitting and uncomfortable N95.” 

Do mask mandates work? Bay Area Covid data from June says no, SFGATE, 29 June 2022

Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

https://expose-news.com/2022/07/01/face-masks-are-ineffective-and-they-have-never-worked/