Police: Woman with pistol killed man who shot at crowd of people in Charleston

Police said a woman who was lawfully carrying a pistol shot and killed a man who began shooting at a crowd of people Wednesday night in Charleston.

Dennis Butler was killed after allegedly shooting at dozens of people attending a graduation party Wednesday near the Vista View Apartment complex. No injuries were reported from those at the party.

DuckDuckGo

DuckDuckGo blocked this video to prevent Facebook from tracking you

We blocked Facebook from tracking you when the page loaded. If you unblock this content, Facebook will know your activity. Learn More

Unblock Video

Investigators said Butler was warned about speeding in the area with children present before he left. He later returned with an AR-15-style firearm and began firing into the crowd before he was shot and killed.

“Instead of running from the threat, she engaged with the threat and saved several lives last night,” Charleston Police Department Chief of Detectives Tony Hazelett said.

Officers did not go into detail, but said Butler did have an extensive criminal history.

Hazelett said no charges will be filed against the woman.

UPDATED, 7:07 a.m. 05/26/22

Charleston police said a man who was shot late Wednesday night has died.

During the investigation, police said investigators learned Dennis Butler was approached earlier in the night about him speeding in the Vista View Apartment complex while children were playing.

Butler then left the complex, but later returned, parked in front of the 1300 Renaissance Circle complex and pulled an AR 15-style rifle.

Police said Butler fired his weapon at people attending a birthday or graduation party.

A bystander at the party quickly drew their weapon and fired at Dennis Butler, fatally wounding him.

No one else was injured.

Several witnesses waited for police to arrive and fully cooperated with the investigation.

The investigation will be turned over to the Kanawha County Prosecutor’s office for review, but at this time, no one has been charged.

ORIGINAL STORY

Dispatchers report the victim of a shooting in Charleston has been transported to a hospital to receive medical treatment.

The incident occurred at the Vista View Apartments complex on Renaissance Circle late Wednesday night.

Charleston police responded to the scene to investigate.

Additional details will be released once they become available.

Pfizer Documents reveal at least 800 people never finished the COVID Vaccine Trial due to Death, Injury or Withdrawn Consent

One of the confidential Pfizer documents that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been forced to publish by court order reveals that approximately 800 people never completed the phase 1 Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine clinical trial in the USA due to either losing their life, suffering a serious adverse event or suddenly withdrawing their consent.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

EMAIL ADDRESS

SUBSCRIBE

Follow The Exposé’s Official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) attempted to delay the release of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine safety data for 75 years despite approving the injection after only 108 days of safety review on December 11th, 2020.

But in early January 2022, Federal Judge Mark Pittman ordered them to release 55,000 pages per month. They released 12,000 pages by the end of January.

Since then, PHMPT has posted all of the documents on its website. The latest drop happened on 1st June 2022.

One of the documents contained in the latest data dump is ‘125742_S1_M5_5351_c4591001 fa interim discontinued patients.pdf’.

The document provides a 112-page list of subjects who withdrew from the phase 1 clinical trial of the Pfizer Covid-19 injection, and provides a vague description as to why.

The first 14 pages list 102 subjects who withdrew from the study. This equates to an average of 7.2 subjects per page. So based on a further 93 pages detailing withdrawn subjects this equates to approximately 780 people who withdrew from the first phase of the clinical trial alone. The actual number could be slightly more or slightly less.

Many of the subjects mysteriously revoked consent to continue in the trial due to reasons such as re-reading the consent form and deciding it is not what they had originally agreed to.

Whilst others withdrew their consent to continue in the study following receipt of dose 1 for unexplained reasons, meaning they did not want to receive the second dose.

But unfortunately, there are several who withdrew their consent to continue the trial due to suffering serious adverse events. Page 110 of the document lists one person who suffered a pulmonary embolism, which is a blood vessel in the lungs blocked by a blood clot. The condition can be life-threatening if not treated quickly.

Page 108 of the document lists one person who suffered a cerebral infarction. The condition is also known as an ischemic stroke and occurs as a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it. A lack of adequate blood supply to brain cells deprives them of oxygen and vital nutrients which can cause parts of the brain to die off.

Page 102 of the document lists a person who suffered a transient ischaemic attack. The condition is also known as a mini-stroke and is again caused by disruption in the blood supply to the brain. Unfortunately, due to suffering the mini-stroke, this person also fell and fractured their ankle at the same time.

Page 100 of the document lists a person who withdrew consent to continue in the trial due to losing their hearing and going completely deaf in one ear. The page also lists another person who suffered ‘syncope’ which is a temporary loss of consciousness usually related to insufficient blood flow to the brain.

Page 94 of the document lists a person who withdrew consent due to suffering tachycardia. The condition refers to a heart rate that is too fast and can be caused by poor blood supply to the heart muscle.

Page 44 of the document lists a person who withdrew consent due to suffering paraparesis. The condition refers to partial paralysis in both legs due to disrupted nerve signals from the brain to the muscles.

Sadly, the document also lists several people who were no longer able to take part in the phase 1 clinical trial due to losing their lives. Several deaths can be viewed throughout the document including, but not limited to pages 106/107, 101, 80 and 47.

Source – Page 106/107

Source – Page 101

Source – Page 80

Source – Page 47

We know why those who sadly died or were injured didn’t complete the trial. But why did hundreds more refuse to continue the phase 1 clinical trial of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine in the USA after being eager to participate originally?

And why were the FDA desperate to hide this document among many others for at least 75 years?

Telegram Channel

https://t.me/+LtveYCKl-JtlNzkx

Early COVID Treatment works – yet more examples Two independent Italian teams validate earlier reports Robert W Malone MD, MS

There are many paradoxes in the COVID-19 data from the western nations concerning disease and death attributed to SARS-CoV-2 infection.  One of the most problematic is the result of widespread systemic reporting bias, in which disease and deaths WITH evidence of infection are grossly over-reported as disease and deaths FROM infection by SARS-CoV-2.  The truth is that we may never be able to resolve this, to get to the bottom of what really went on, due to perverse political and financial incentives to over-report COVID-19 deaths (while also minimizing toxicity of the vaccines).  But there is no question that if you are admitted to a western hospital with a COVID-19 diagnosis, your risk of death during that hospitalization has been amazingly high. 

In my opinion, many of those hospital deaths were avoidable – many were iatrogenic (due to medical error).  Iatrogenic disease is the result of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures undertaken on a patient.  Again and again I hear academics, physicians, hospitalists and relatives of patients speak of the horrors of hospital-based treatment of COVID-19, of the unnecessary isolation of the patients, of the horrible and inhumane treatment which patients are receiving, of the toxicity of the FDA-approved and Fauci-promoted drug Remdesivir (globally nicknamed by nurses and orderlies “run, death is near”), and of the contribution of bad intubation and ventilation practices to those outcomes. 

But they never, ever acknowledge that their mismanagement of these patients has contributed to the death toll.  The hospitalists have often slavishly followed the inpatient guidance protocols of the NIH (which has never before been in the business of setting national treatment standards), while failing to even be willing to try the alternative inpatient and outpatient treatments which many independent physicians have developed and successfully implemented while saving many thousands of patients’ lives. Clearly, what is needed is a way to keep patients from ever getting to the hospital and receiving these dysfunctional treatments associated with high levels of iatrogenic disease and death.

There is no question in my mind that early COVID-19 treatment saves lives, and many different repurposed drug treatment protocols for treating this disease have become popular despite withering criticism and gaslighting from FDA, NIH, corporate media and hospitalist physicians. For example treatment protocols, see those developed by FLCCC, Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, Drs. George Fareed and Brian Tyson , and the European doctors who practice under the banner of Ippocrateorg.org.  In just one example, while in the USA Ivermectin has been vilified by both FDA and the press, worldwide adoption of Ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19 disease is now at 45%!

Ivermectin is currently used for about 27% of the world's population. Countries where COVID-19 mortality is close to zero may not have incentive to adopt treatments. When excluding these countries, ivermectin adoption is about 45%. We excluded countries where the cumulative mortality over the preceding month was less than 1 in 1 million, according to the data at https://ourworldindata.org/). For the estimated population coverage, isolated use, some regions, mixed usage, and many regions use a factor of 0.05, 0.25, 0.5, and 0.75 respectively. For source reference, please see here.

While many of these alternative early treatment and hospital treatment protocols rely on drug combinations which typically include Hydroxychloroquine + Azithromycin (the combo championed by Dr. Didier Raoult) or Ivermectin, there are many other drugs and combinations which have shown substantial efficacy in both outpatient and inpatient treatment environments.  

For example, those who have followed my work over the last two years may be familiar with the data supporting the use of Famotidine with or without Celecoxib.  For relevant papers, please see here, and here, and here.  Unfortunately, despite passing peer review, publication of much of this work and associated findings was actively blocked by various academic journals and ridiculed by lay press including the Washington Post (see also here), despite having been demonstrated to have benefits in clinical trials including a randomized Phase 2 clinical trial. More detail on that sordid story in a future article, but how and why journalists with no medical training working for the Washington Post became arbiters of medical truth continues to elude me.  Who knows how many lives could have been saved if the lay press had just focused on doing solid reporting rather than trying to influence clinical treatment practices while attacking physicians that were just trying to do their jobs.

Although it may seem like both the government and the lay press in the United States has been particularly hostile to early treatment protocols employing cheap generic drugs for COVID-19, things have been even more difficult for Italian physicians providing early treatment.  This makes the following studies even more remarkable!

An Italian team working in a traditional hospital setting has published two peer reviewed studies, one in the Lancet-affiliated journal eClinical Medicine and the other in Frontiers in Medicine. The clinical treatment protocol tested in the clinical trial associated with these publications is built around COX-2 inhibitors (Nimesulide, which is available in EU but not USA or Celecoxib, which is available in both EU and USA).  In the case of either of these agents being contraindicated due to patient pre-existing conditions, the combined COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitor Aspirin (careful, this is also used to treat horses…) was substituted.  The title of the corresponding clinical trial says it all-

“A Simple Approach to Prevent Hospitalization for COVID-19 Patients”

Here is the resulting recommended outpatient clinical treatment protocol-

I. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)

Relatively selective COX-2 inhibitors §# (for myalgias and/or arthralgias or other painful symptoms)

§ based on the ratio of concentrations of the various NSAIDs required to inhibit the activity of COX-1 and COX-2 by 50 percent (IC50) in whole blood assays

#unless contraindicated

Nimesulide *

100 mg b.i.d p.o, after a meal, for a maximum of 12 days.

Or

Celecoxib *

Initial oral dose of 400 mg, followed by a second dose of 200 mg on the first day of therapy. In the following days, up to a maximum of 400 mg (200 mg twice a day) should be given as needed for a maximum of 12 days

* Should the patient have a fever (≥37.3°C) or develop laboratory signs of hepatotoxicity associated with nimesulide, or if there are contraindications to celecoxib, these drugs should be substituted with aspirin (a COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitor) (500 mg twice a day p.o.—after a meal). Patients receiving these treatments should also be given a proton pump inhibitor (e.g., lansoprazole-−30 mg/day; or omeprazole-−20 mg/day; or pantoprazole-−20 mg/day).

Approximately 3 days after the onset of symptoms (or longer if the physician is seeing the patient for the first time), a series of hematochemical tests should be performed (blood cell count, D-dimer, CRP, creatinine, fasting blood glucose, ALT). Nimesulide/celecoxib (or aspirin) treatment can continue if inflammatory indexes (CRP, neutrophil count), ALT, and D-dimer are in the normal range,.

II. Corticosteroids*

Dexamethasone (for persistent fever or musculoskeletal pain or if hematochemical tests are repeated a few days later and there is even a mild increase in the inflammatory indexes—CRP, neutrophil count –, or if the patient has a cough and oxygen saturation (SpO2)<94–92% occur)

8 mg p.o. for 3 days, then tapered to 4 mg for a further 3 days, and then to 2 mg for 3 days. This makes a total of 42 mg dexamethasone over 9 days.

*The duration of corticosteroid treatment also depends on the clinical evolution of the disease

III. Anticoagulants

Low−molecularweight(LMW)heparin* (when the hematochemical tests show even a mild increase in D-dimer, or for thromboembolism prophylaxis for bedridden patients)

Enoxaparin, at the prophylactic daily dose of 4,000 U.I subcutaneously—i.e., 40 mg enoxaparin. Treatment recommended for at least 7–14 days, independently of the patient recovering mobility.

*unless contraindicated (e.g., ongoing bleeding or platelet count<25 × 109/L)

IV. Oxygen therapy

Gentle oxygen supply in the early phase of the disease, possibly before pulmonary symptoms manifest, in the presence of progressively decreasing oxygen saturation—as indicated by an oximeter—or following a first episode of dyspnoea or wheezing.

Conventional oxygen therapy is suggested when the respiratory rate is >14/min and oxygen saturation (SpO2) < 94–92%, but is required with SpO2 <90% at room air. With liquid oxygen, start with 8–10 liter/min and monitor SpO2 every 3–4 h. Titrate oxygen flow rate to reach target SpO2 >94%. Then the rate of oxygen administration can be reduced to 4–5 liter/min (but continue SpO2 monitoring every 3–4 h). With gaseous O2, start with 2.5–3.0 liter/min, but monitor SpO2 more frequently than with liquid oxygen, and titrate flow rates to reach target SpO2 >94%. Hospitalization could be considered, if feasible, when oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≤ 90% at room air, despite conventional oxygen therapy.

V. Antibiotics

Azithromycin* (with bacterial pneumonia or suspected secondary bacterial upper respiratory tract infections, or when hematochemical inflammatory indexes (CRP, neutrophil count) are markedly altered)

500 mg/day p.o. for 6–10 days depending on the clinical judgement

* Should the patient be at risk of or have a history of cardiac arrhythmia or present other contraindications, cefixime (400 mg/day p.o for 6–10 days) or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (1 gr three times a day for 6–10 days) can be considered as alternatives to azithromycin.

In a separate study completed by the IppocrateOrg Association Working Group for the Early Outpatient Treatment of COVID-19 (which is predominantly an association of Italian physicians and scientists), an alternative protocol also demonstrated effectiveness in outpatient treatment of COVID-19.

EARLY OUTPATIENT TREATMENT OF COVID-19: A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF 392 CASES IN ITALY

These researchers conclude:

“This is the first study describing attitudes and behaviors of physicians caring for COVID-19 outpatients, and the effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 early treatment in the real world. COVID-19 lethality in our cohort was 0,2%, while the overall COVID-19 lethality in Italy in the same period was between 3% and 3,8%. The use of individual drugs and drug combinations described in this study appears therefore effective and safe, as indicated by the few and mild ADR reported. Present evidence should be carefully considered by physicians caring for COVID-19 patients as well as by political decision makers managing the current global crisis.”

The protocol used for this study is more typical of the protocols used in the United States. As is often the case in the United States, the general treatment protocol developed by the Ippocrateorg team is staged by disease severity, and can be found here.

A summary table of the treatment received for the 392 summarized Italian cases is appended below (note the use of aspirin):

In conclusion, irrespective of the excess death and disease associated with the mandated genetic vaccines, there is no doubt in my mind that the concerted and coordinated propaganda and information control efforts of the United States Government Department of Health and Human Services, acting in alignment and as sponsors of Big Tech and Corporate Media censorship, have cost large amounts of unnecessary death and disease due to both iatrogenic causes during hospitalization as well as by suppression of life saving early treatment protocols. The data supporting this conclusion increase almost daily. The unresolved issue remains. Will anyone be held accountable for this avoidable tragedy?

Who is Robert Malone is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Telegram Channel

https://t.me/+LtveYCKl-JtlNzkx

Scientists discover some Fully Vaccinated Children are suffering Sepsis & Autoimmune Disease when exposed to Covid-19

A new study conducted by several doctors on behalf of the University of Colorado has found that Covid-19 vaccination can cause children to suffer Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease (V-AED), and further analysis of the confidential Pfizer documents forcibly published by court order reveals both Pfizer and the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) knew it would happen.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

EMAIL ADDRESS

SUBSCRIBE

Follow The Exposé’s Official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here

The study, published 31st May 2022, aimed to prove that Covid-19 vaccination effectively protects children against multisystem inflammatory syndrome. But unfortunately, they discovered the study authors discovered the complete opposite.

Source

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS) is a condition that mainly affects children, and causes dangerous inflammation throughout the body, including in the:

• Heart

• Lungs

• Kidneys

• Brain

• Skin

• Eyes

• Digestive organs

The condition can be both severe and life-threatening. Unfortunately, experts have no idea what causes it, but this hasn’t stopped the U.S. Centers for Disease Control from attributing the condition to complications of the alleged Covid-19 disease.

Researchers from the University of Colorado carried out a detailed study of two otherwise healthy, fully vaccinated children in the USA who were diagnosed with multisystem inflammatory syndrome.

Child 1

In the first case, headache and myalgia developed in a healthy 14-year-old boy, but by day 7 of suffering illness, fever, abdominal pain, diarrhoea, emesis, bloodshot eyes, red cracked lips, and rash had also developed. On day 10, he was brought for treatment to the emergency department and admitted to a quaternary-care pediatric hospital.

Three months earlier, he had completed the Pfizer-BioNTech 2-dose COVID-19 vaccine series. One month later, he experienced three days of coughing and congestion and tested positive by PCR for SARS-CoV-2 infection, from which he allegedly recovered.

At hospital admission, an examination by doctors noted a sickly appearance, fever (39.1°C), tachycardia, rash, conjunctivitis, cracked lips, and abdominal tenderness.

Laboratory testing revealed hyponatremia; thrombocytopenia; lymphopenia; and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and liver function test levels (Table 1).

Liver function lab Results for Child 1
Source

An echocardiogram revealed trivial pericardial effusion. While abdominal ultrasound and chest radiograph results were unremarkable. Tests for SARS-CoV-2 spike and nucleocapsid IgG returned a positive. Other infectious condition test results were negative (Table 2).

Infectious lab results for Child 1
Source

On the patient’s first day of hospitalization, the infectious diseases section was consulted, and it was determined that the patient’s illness met the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention multisystem inflammatory syndrome criteria.

Treatment improved the rash, headache, and conjunctivitis but fever, malaise, and nausea persisted, and cardiac markers rose. After further treatment, the child was eventually discharged on day 5 of hospitalisation.

Cardiology follow-up 6 weeks after hospital discharge, unfortunately, revealed ongoing fatigue and a new mild left main coronary artery enlargement.

Child 2

In the second case, fever and fatigue, followed by congestion, cough, myalgias, headache, nausea, and vomiting, developed in an otherwise healthy 14-year-old girl.

On day 3 of illness, rapid SARS-CoV-2 and influenza test results were negative, then on day 12, she was brought to the emergency department due to suffering persistent fever, headache, cough, and vomiting. This time she tested positive for Covid-19.

Three months before her illness, she had completed the 2-dose Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine series.

The child was prescribed amoxicillin for possible sinusitis and discharged. But then on day 14, she returned to the hospital for dyspnea and required low-flow oxygen for hypoxemia. Electrocardiogram, troponin, and NT-proBNP test results were normal.

She was admitted and criminally received 1 dose of remdesivir, which was discontinued because of elevated liver function test results (Table 1).

(If you want to know why it’s considered criminal to administer Remdesivir to children then you can read an article all about it here. The UK equivalent is a drug called Midazolam, and you can read another article all about that here.)

Liver function lab Results for Child 2
Source

The child improved and was discharged on day 18. However, she returned the next day with a recrudescent fever, emesis, and a new diffuse rash, including on her palms and soles.

Laboratory testing demonstrated elevated CRP, D-dimer, liver function, NT-proBNP, and creatinine levels (Table 1). Abdominal ultrasound and computed tomography showed incidentally enlarged kidneys.

Liver function lab Results for Child 2 after being readmitted
Source

At readmission on day 19, differential diagnoses included multisystem inflammatory syndrome, acute COVID-19 with hyper inflammation, sepsis, toxic shock syndrome, drug reaction, and vasculitis or another autoimmune disease.

A SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid IgG test was positive. Additional infectious and rheumatologic test results were negative (Table 2). After discussion among multidisciplinary specialists, doctors considered multisystem inflammatory syndrome most likely.

Eventually, the child was discharged on day 9 of readmittance to the hospital.

What does the Study tell us?

First, let’s take a look at some of the horrific illnesses that were suffered by these two children.

• Hyponatremia: This is a condition characterized by low levels of sodium in the blood. Its symptoms are similar to those caused by dehydration. In severe cases, the brain may swell, which can lead to headaches, seizures, coma, and even death

• Thrombocytopenia: This is a deficiency of platelets in the blood. This causes bleeding into the tissues, bruising, and slow blood clotting after injury.

• Lymphopenia: This is a disorder in which your blood doesn’t have enough white blood cells called lymphocytes, which play an essential protective role in your immune system.

• Sepsis: This is a life-threatening reaction to an infection. It happens when your immune system overreacts to an infection and starts to damage your body’s own tissues and organs.

• Toxic shock syndrome: This is a rare but life-threatening condition caused by bacteria getting into the body and releasing harmful toxins.

• Vasculitis or another autoimmune disease: Vasculitis is an autoimmune disease that causes inflammation and narrowing of blood vessels. Autoimmune disease happens when the body’s natural defence system can’t tell the difference between your own cells and foreign cells, causing the body to mistakenly attack normal cells.

It’s hard to believe that two children could possibly suffer all of these horrendous conditions following infection with Covid-19, when we know that children are at negligible risk of suffering illness worse than the common cold.

But the reason these two otherwise healthy children suffered these conditions is because they had received two doses of the Pfizer Covid-19 injection and unfortunately went on to suffer Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease once they were exposed to the alleged Covid-19 virus.

How do we know this? Because it’s all in the confidential Pfizer documents that the U.S Food & Drug Administration (FDA) has been forced to publish by court order.

The Confidential Pfizer Documents & Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease

Vaccine-associated enhanced diseases (VAED) are modified presentations of clinical infections affecting individuals exposed to a wild-type pathogen after having received a prior vaccination for the same pathogen.

Enhanced responses are triggered by failed attempts to control the infecting virus, and VAED typically presents with symptoms related to the target organ of the infection pathogen. According to scientists VAED occurs as two different immunopathologies, antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) and vaccine-associated hypersensitivity (VAH).

Intensive research conducted by health experts throughout the years has brought to light increasing concerns about “Antibody-Dependent Enhancement” (ADE), a phenomenon where vaccines make the disease far worse by priming the immune system for a potentially deadly overreaction.

ADE can arise in several different ways but the best-known is dubbed the ‘Trojan Horse Pathway’. This occurs when non-neutralizing antibodies generated by past infection or vaccination fail to shut down the pathogen upon re-exposure.

Instead, they act as a gateway by allowing the virus to gain entry and replicate in cells that are usually off limits (typically immune cells, like macrophages). That, in turn, can lead to wider dissemination of illness, and over-reactive immune responses that cause more severe illness.

Here’s a short video of the Chief Medical Advisor to the U.S. President, Dr Anthony Fauci, explaining the undesirable consequence. In it, he confirms it could be a possible danger of the Covid-19 injections and that this would not be the first time it has happened.

Now, thanks to an uncorrupted judge we know it does.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) attempted to delay the release of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine safety data for 75 years despite approving the injection after only 108 days of safety review on December 11th, 2020.

But in early January 2022, Federal Judge Mark Pittman ordered them to release 55,000 pages per month. They released 12,000 pages by the end of January.

Since then, PHMPT has posted all of the documents to its website. The latest drop happened on June 1st 2022.

One of the documents contained in the data dump is ‘reissue_5.3.6 postmarketing experience.pdf’. Table 5, found on page 11 of the document shows an ‘Important Potential Risk’, and that risk is listed as ‘Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease (VAED), including Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Respiratory Disease (VAERD)’.

Pfizer claim in their confidential document that up to 28th Feb 2021, they had received 138 cases reporting 317 potentially relevant events indicative of Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease. Of these 71 were medically significant resulting in 8 disabilities, 13 were life-threatening events, and 38 of the 138 people died.

Of the 317 relevant events reported by 138 people, 135 were labelled as ‘drug ineffective’, 53 were labelled as dyspnoea (struggling to breathe), 23 were labelled as Covid-19 pneumonia, 8 were labelled as respiratory failure, and 7 were labelled as seizure.

Pfizer also admitted that 75 of the 101 subjects with confirmed Covid-19 following vaccination, had severe disease resulting in hospitalisation, disability, life-threatening consequences or death.

But Pfizer still definitively concluded, for the purposes of their submitted safety data to the Food and Drug Administration, the very data that was needed to gain emergency use authorisation and make them billions and billions of dollars, that ‘None of the 75 cases could be definitively considered as VAED’.

But Pfizer then went on to confirm that based on the current evidence, VAED remains a theoretical risk.

Source

Further evidence from the confidential document also shows that both the FDA and Pfizer knew the Covid-19 injection has killed at least 12 people who developed an autoimmune disorder, by February 2021. That doesn’t mean these are the only people to have died due to autoimmune conditions induced by the jabs, these are just the ones that were officially reported to Pfizer in the first two months of their vaccine roll-out.

Source

Confidential data proves that the Covid-19 injections should never have been granted emergency use authorisation, and should have been pulled from distribution by the FDA as soon as they sighted the figures.

But the FDA failed to act, and that is precisely why we’re now seeing studies published containing horrific details of fully vaccinated children suffering brain swelling, internal bleeding and blood clotting, life-threatening reactions to infections, decimated immune systems, and autoimmune diseases following Covid-19 infection.

Telegram Channel

https://t.me/+LtveYCKl-JtlNzkx

Top 10 Most Dystopian Things Pushed by the World Economic Forum: No.4 Praising Massive Lockdowns BY RHODA WILSON

Throughout the years, people at the World Economic Forum (“WEF”) have said some highly disturbing things, none of which garnered proper media attention. When one pieces together the topics championed by WEF, an overarching theme emerges – the total control of humanity using media, science, and technology while reshaping democracies to form a global government.

If this sounds like a far-fetched conspiracy theory, keep reading. We are sharing the 10 most dystopian things according to The Vigilant Citizen, one at a time, that are being pushed by WEF, right now. They are in no particular order because they’re all equally crazy. Here is the third on the list.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

EMAIL ADDRESS

SUBSCRIBE

Follow The Exposé’s Official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here

Praising Massive Lockdowns

In 2020 and 2021, cities around the world were subjected to massive and drastic lockdowns causing loss of life, loss of livelihoods, poverty and starvation. During this horrific period, children could not attend school for months and were essentially barred from interacting with other children. A slew of small and medium businesses was destroyed while large corporations strived, worldwide it has resulted in the greatest transfer of wealth from the very many to the very few.

Despite all of this, WEF could not hide its love of drastic, life-destroying lockdowns. It released a video on 26 February 2021 surrealistically called ‘Lockdowns are quietly improving cities around the world’. Here’s this piece of complete insanity.

Click on the image below to watch the video on Rumble.

Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum Wants Lockdowns, 26 February 2021 (1 min)

The video states “Lockdowns significantly reduced human activity … leading to Earth’s quietest period in decades,” while showing dystopian images of empty cities and planes stuck on the ground.

Completely ignoring the immense human suffering caused by these lockdowns, the WEF considered it was all worth it because “carbon emissions were down 7% in 2020”.

The Spectator (Australia) elaborates further, “don’t worry that lockdowns have led to job losses, suicides, drug overdoses, isolation, mental health issues, domestic abuse, bankruptcies and homelessness … Imagine how excited those sociopaths at the WEF will be when they realise that cemeteries are dead quiet. Oh, the possibilities!”

On the same day WEF tweeted their video Sky News Australia’s host Cory Bernardi released a video report on WEF: “Make no mistake servitisation is just a new name for economic slavery.  It’s socialism on a global scale.”

World Economic Forum leads a ‘concerted effort’ for global socialism: Bernardi, 26 February 2021 (6 mins)

If the video above is removed from YouTube you can watch it on Sky News Australia’s website HERE.

When WEF first tweeted its video, it garnered intense backlash. So, the day after posting it WEF deleted it and tweeted a retraction, well a sort of retraction.  As you can see, despite deleting the video, WEF kept praising lockdowns. That’s because WEF would love to see “covidian” life become permanent.

World Economic Forum Twitter, 27 February 2021

One Twitter user responded to WEF’s retraction:

Translation : the original tweet evoked so much negative feedback, highlighting the #wef in the way you’d rather avoid, so you deleted it. But knowing folks will have got screen shots – you’ll trysome damage limitation.

Too late. You’ve been rumbled !

— Randomtox (@CeeOfGee) February 27, 2021

Lockdown is the world’s biggest psychological experiment

This is the title of an article published by WEF on 9 April 2020.  The full title is ‘Lockdown is the world’s biggest psychological experiment – and we will pay the price’. 

“We”?  Really?

To give the article some context: the UK began its first lockdown on 23 March 2020, less than three weeks before WEF published this article. The article stated:

“Currently, an estimated 2.6 billion people – one-third of the world’s population – are living under some kind of lockdown or quarantine. This is arguably the largest psychological experiment ever conducted.

“Unfortunately, we already have a good idea of its results. In late February 2020, right before European countries mandated various forms of lockdowns, The Lancet published a review of 24 studies documenting the psychological impact of quarantine (the “restriction of movement of people who have potentially been exposed to a contagious disease”). The findings offer a glimpse of what is brewing in hundreds of millions of households around the world.

“Right before the lockdown, we conducted a benchmark survey among a representative sample of the Belgian population. In that survey, we saw that 32% of the population could be classified as highly resilient (“green”). Only 15% of the population indicated toxic levels of stress (“red”).

“In our most recent survey after two weeks of lockdown, the green portion has shrunk to 25% of the population. The “red” part of the population has increased by 10 percentage points to fully 25% of the population.

“We need to act now to mitigate the toxic effects of this lockdown.” [emphasis our own]

Lockdown is the world’s biggest psychological experiment – and we will pay the price, WEF, 9 April 2020

As WEF is known to delete articles, and videos, we have downloaded a copy of their article and attached it below.

Covid-lockdown-is-worlds-biggest-psychological-experimentDownload

How fortunate they thought to conduct a survey “right before lockdown.” It’s almost as if they knew when it was going to be implemented and prepared to enable measurement of the effects of the “biggest psychological experiment.” 

The public didn’t have such insider knowledge.  In the UK, for example, on 12 March, right before lockdown, Prime Minister Boris Johnson reassured the public: “At some point in the next few weeks, we are likely to go further and if someone in a household has those symptoms, we will be asking everyone in the household to stay at home. We are not introducing this yet … We are not – repeat not – closing schools now. The scientific advice is that this could do more harm than good at this time.” 

It was only on 23 March that the public knew about the drastic measures they would take.  Later in the day, Prime Minister Johnson stunned millions of Britons with a momentous and tough lockdown announcement in a special broadcast.

“From this evening I must give the British people a very simple instruction – you must stay at home,” the Prime Minister announced.

10 Downing Street: United Kingdom Prime Minister Boris Johnson gives an important update on coronavirus,
23 March 2020 (6 mins)

Climate lockdowns

Despite the warning in April 2020 of what was “brewing for hundreds of millions of households” and that “we need to act now,” in September 2020, WEF published an article ‘Emissions fell during lockdown. Let’s keep it that way’.

The article opens with the question: “as the focus shifts to recovering from Covid-19, will we take decisions that restore economies and support the “green” agenda?”  And goes on to state that “the environmental boost and the slowdown in greenhouse gas emissions that we experienced in the early part of the year” are a “silver lining.”

“As industrial output plummeted, and as cars disappeared from roads, and planes were grounded, people worldwide noticed a positive effect on their surroundings.”

Emissions fell during lockdown. Let’s keep it that way, WEF, 24 September 2020

Of course, as industrial output plummeted so did employment and quality of life.  How many lives and livelihoods were lost due to “the world’s biggest psychological experiment”?  How many more percentage points of populations were in the “red” part having reached toxic levels of stress? How many children missed out on vital education or social interaction crucial for development?  WEF’s article doesn’t ask those questions.

And the article doesn’t seem to approve of allowing people to recover from their experiment either:

“This wouldn’t be the first time an economic recovery comes at the detriment of the environment … [After the 2008–2009 global financial crisis] emissions soon returned to their previous path almost as if the crisis had not occurred.  Let’s not repeat the same mistake.

“Transitioning to a global economy that decarbonises, maintains prosperity, and decreases inequality at the same time will be a Herculean challenge. There is no quick-fix vaccination.”

Emissions fell during lockdown. Let’s keep it that way, WEF, 24 September 2020

Lockdowns reduced prosperity and increased inequality. Is WEF suggesting “transitioning” to a global economy that maintains the reduced prosperity while trying to decrease inequality, possibly a little closer to the level it was before the lockdowns began, is a good thing?  WEF could increase prosperity and eliminate inequality relatively quickly if their members’ wealth was responsibly re-distributed.  If WEF members owned nothing the world would be a more prosperous and happier place.

The author is correct on one point though. There is no “quick-fix vaccination.”  The Covid injections, which we presume are the vaccinations the author is attempting to draw parallels with, are experimental and dangerous, much like their lockdowns, and although they were quick, too quick, they certainly aren’t a “fix.”

In March 2021, WEF published another “victory” article for climate change.  The article titled ‘A year into the pandemic: 3 things we’ve learnt about the planet’ attempts to make out the “climate scientists” are almost heroic: “The pandemic made us think on our feet about how to get around some of the difficulties of monitoring greenhouse gas emissions, and CO₂ in particular, in real time … So, climate scientists set about looking for other data that might indicate how CO₂ was changing.”

As they had no real-world data, the “scientists” turned to speculation and guesswork to monitor greenhouse gases:

“We used information on lockdown as a mirror for global emissions. In other words, if we knew what the emissions were from various economic sectors or countries pre-pandemic, and we knew by how much activity had fallen, we could assume that their emissions had fallen by the same amount.

“By May 2020, a landmark study combined government lockdown policies and activity data from around the world to predict a 7% fall in CO₂ emissions by the end of the year … This was soon followed by research by my own team, which used Google and Apple mobility data to reflect changes in ten different pollutants, while a third study again tracked CO₂ emissions using data on fossil fuel combustion and cement production.”

A year into the pandemic: 3 things we’ve learnt about the planet, WEF, 15 March 2021

Again, as this is the sort of article that is likely to fall victim to an inexplicable and sudden “disappearance,” we have downloaded a copy and attached it below.

What-have-we-learned-about-climate-change-from-the-pandemicDownload

The censorship for those who call out parties guilty of promoting lockdowns is visible.  For example, the recent case of censorship of Dr. Naomi Wolfe’s book. Dr. Wolfe warned America and the world at the start of the Covid “pandemic” that it would be used to eviscerate the Constitution and civil liberties. She predicted the tyranny that was to come via the lockdowns and mask and vaccine mandates.  She recently published a book ‘The Body of Others’ and Amazon is “restricting” the public from purchasing it.  Dr. Wolfe posted on her Gettr profile in early June:

Dr. Naomi Wolfe on Gettr, 5 June 2022

Are you beginning to see how their anti-science scam works?

So, what is the truth about climate lockdowns?  Friends of Science has recently released a statement that “climate lockdowns and cuts as proposed by [economist Marianna] Mazzucato and the UNEP would be a useless effort to mitigate climate change, but a catastrophic blow to human civilisation.”  But WEF and their henchmen already know all of this.

In response to a now-deleted tweet,Friends of Science summed it up:

“World Economic Forum LOVES lockdowns + destroying airlines. They all have private jets. What do they care? “Lockdowns, NetZero and ESG Policies Won’t Stop Climate Change – Will Destroy Lives.”  And attached the following two images:

Telegram Channel

https://t.me/+LtveYCKl-JtlNzkx

Lockdowns, NetZero and ESG Policies Won’t Stop Climate Change – They Will Destroy Lives BY RHODA WILSON

Friends of Science released a statement last week stating that JP Morgan’s energy analysis exposes “The Elephants in the Room” on NetZero and environmental, social, and corporate governance (“ESG”), challenging assumptions made by people like Mark Carney at Davos last month.

The Stockholm+50 “Exponential Roadmap” hype and the UNEP push for climate lockdowns every year for a decade would be ineffective as CO2 concentration changes in the atmosphere due to the Covid lockdown were far smaller than the random natural fluctuations, Friends of Science said.

(Related: The Green World Order: Efforts to Cease the Use of Crude Oil Could Be the Greatest Threat to Civilisation’s Eight Billion People)

Friends of Science Society is an independent group of earth, atmospheric and solar scientists, engineers, and citizens that is celebrating its 20th year of offering climate science insights. After a thorough review of a broad spectrum of literature on climate change, Friends of Science Society has concluded that the sun is the main driver of climate change, not CO2.

As web pages have been known to unexpectedly “disappear,” we have copied the press release below.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

EMAIL ADDRESS

SUBSCRIBE

Follow The Exposé’s Official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here

Press Release Friends of Science, Calgary, Alberta, 8 June 2022

JP Morgan’s 2022 Annual Energy Paper issued in May, subtitled ‘The Elephants in the Room’ brings some gripping and grim reality to the Utopian goals of NetZero, ESG and climate lockdown advocates, says Friends of Science Society.

“The Elephants in the Room” challenges many of the breezy assumptions of climate activists and financiers like Mark Carney and GFANZ collection*, whose recent DAVOS appearance suggests that just throwing money at climate and energy issues will result in magical results, when this is nothing more than Magical Thinking, as Robert Lyman has reported. (*GFANZ – Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero)

At the Davos World Economic Forum on 29 May 2022, Carney claimed “We need an energy transformation on the scale of the industrial revolution at the speed of the digital transformation and therefore we need a revolution in finance.”

Numerous independent energy analysts such as Vaclav Smil, Samuel Furfari, Ken Gregory, and Francis Menton have shown that such thinking is simply delusional.

The recent Stockholm+50 has been pushing the “Exponential Roadmap”, issued in September 2019. Subsequently, economist Marianna Mazzucato called for action now to avoid climate lockdowns, while the UNEP called for emissions cuts of 7.6% every year for the next decade. In the spring of 2021, World Economic Forum (“WEF”) cheered on Covid lockdowns as “improving cities” and was taken to task for its cruel tone-deafness by The Spectator (Australia).

The notion persists that there were dramatic reductions of carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere during Covid lockdowns, but this is inaccurate, as detailed in Friends of Science Open Letter to the Bank of Canada and in Dr. Roy Spencer’s analysis.

An excerpt from the Open Letter reads:

“The fact is the drop in emissions during Covid lockdowns is not enough to significantly affect the increase of carbon dioxide (“CO2”) in the atmosphere. One must compare the change of emissions to the annual change of CO2 concentrations, not to the cumulative CO2. This graph from Dr. Roy Spencer’s article shows that the annual random fluctuations of the change of CO2 concentrations are far larger than the expected change due to lockdown reduction changes of emissions. The expected reduction in the annual CO2 increase in the atmosphere is only 0.12 ppm (twelve hundredth parts per million) due to the Covid lockdown in 2020. But the annual fluctuation is 0.5 to 1.0 ppm (5 tenths to 1 part per million) Therefore, the CO2 change in the atmosphere due to the Covid lockdown is far smaller than the random fluctuations.”

“Furthermore, carbon dioxide has never been empirically shown to be the main driver of climate change. There has been no global change in extreme weather events, including floods, droughts, storms, or hurricanes.”

As shown in “Net Zero + Green Grid = The Great Regret” event videos with Dr. Ian Plimer on climate science and Joanne Nova on the “Crash Test Dummy of Renewables – Australian power grid”, NetZero and ESG policies are destroying the lives of people for no useful purpose. Climate lockdowns and cuts as proposed by Mazzucato and the UNEP would be a useless effort to mitigate climate change, but a catastrophic blow to human civilisation.

Telegram Channel

https://t.me/+LtveYCKl-JtlNzkx

Republican Gubernatorial Candidate Says Vaccination Status Will Block Him From Attending Debate By Jack Phillips

New York gubernatorial candidate Andrew Giuliani confirmed he was banned from attending an in-person debate on Monday against his Republican opponents because he won’t provide proof of COVID-19 vaccination.

Giuliani, the son of former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, announced he was running for New York governor last year. He worked in the Trump administration as a public liaison to former President Donald Trump as his father represented Trump as his personal attorney.

During a press conference streamed on Sunday, Giuliani said he has to participate in the debate remotely, saying that WCBS-TV told him that he would need to provide proof of a negative test. Later, he added, the network wanted him to provide proof of vaccination.

“I told them I would not do that,” he said. “I don’t think that’s something that even someone who has chosen to get the shot should have to do, from a constitutional standpoint.”

WCBS-TV told The Associated Press that anyone who enters its facility has to show proof of COVID-19 vaccination.

“Any candidate who doesn’t meet this requirement is encouraged to participate in Monday’s debate remotely,” the company told the wire service over the past weekend.

The younger Giuliani said he wrote a letter to CBS executives criticizing the station’s move to block him from attending the debate.

“While [your rules] will disrupt Monday’s debate, the true injustice is that policies such as these have deprived front-line heroes such as firefighters, police, and healthcare workers of employment and benefits,” he said via his campaign.

Giuliani has criticized New York City’s vaccine mandates in the past and said that if he’s elected, he will restore the jobs of government workers who were fired for not getting the COVID-19 shot.

During his news conference, Guiliani said he has chosen not to get the vaccine for several reasons, including that federal health officials have said the COVID-19 vaccine “doesn’t actually stop transmission.”

“I chose very clearly that I was not going to get the shot,” Giuliani said Sunday. “I wish I had the opportunity to be in studio.”

In the Republican race for the governor’s seat, he faces competition from Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-N.Y.), businessman Harry Wilson, and former Westchester County executive Rob Astorino.

Winners of the Republican primary will face off against Gov. Kathy Hochul, who is the front-running Democrat candidate. Hochul took office last year following former Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s resignation after a series of highly publicized scandals.

The GOP and Democrat primaries will be held on June 28, and voting starts on June 18. The last Republican governor of New York was George Pataki, who departed in 2006, and since then, it’s an office that has been dominated by Democrats.

The Epoch Times has contacted WCBS-TV for comment.

Jack Phillips

BREAKING NEWS REPORTER

Follow

Jack Phillips is a breaking news reporter at The Epoch Times based in New York.

Telegram Channel

https://t.me/+LtveYCKl-JtlNzkx