Desmond Swayne Questions Sajid Javid and DHSC Removes Job Advert for Covid Pass Deputy Director BY RHODA WILSON

On 21 February Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced the “Living with Covid Strategy.”  He confirmed that “domestic legal restrictions will end on 24 February as we begin to treat Covid as other infectious diseases such as flu.”

“From April 1st, we will also no longer recommend the use of voluntary Covid-status certification, although the NHS app will continue to allow people to indicate their vaccination status for international travel,” the Prime Minister said.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

EMAIL ADDRESS

SUBSCRIBE


Follow The Exposé’s Official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here

However, on 16 April we wrote an article titled ‘Some NHS Trusts Are Still Hiring For “Coronavirus Related” Jobs’ in which we noted that NHS trusts had posted 225 new “coronavirus related” job advertisements within the previous week alone.

And on 15 April Fiona Rose Diamond posted on her Telegram channel that the NHS was advertising for a “Covid Pass Delivery Manager.”  She noted that the job advert stated:

“NHS COVID Pass enables citizens to demonstrate their COVID-19 status when travelling abroad or when visiting organisations who have opted to implement a domestic certification process. Since its launch, in May 2021 the service has been used millions of times.”

“We’re growing and have opportunities for Delivery Managers to join our Citizen Health Technology directorate to support the Covid Pass programme.”

Since then, another role was advertised for a “Deputy Director, Delivery Lead Covid Pass.”  The advert was posted on the Department of Health & Social Care (“DHSC”) jobs site.  One of our readers took a screenshot of the job advert header:

Civil Service Jobs, retrieved 5 June 2022

On 8 June, Diamond again alerted her followers through a post on her Telegram channel about this latest “Covid Pass” role and encouraged her followers to “apply” for the job. “I think we should spam the hell out of these tyrannical sh** bags,” she wrote and attached the LINK.

Quoting the advert, Diamond commented that DHSC was looking for someone who will be:

“…a passionate advocate of future-proof technologies and will work with service management and policy colleagues to deliver the Covid Pass Programme, a key strategic priority for DHSC and Her Majesty’s Government (HMG). This is a high profile, complex programme which interacts with other departments, Devolved Administrations and public and private sector stakeholders.”

On the same day in the House of Commons, Desmond Swayne, Member of Parliament (“MP”) for New Forest West, questioned Sajid Javid, MP for Bromsgrove and Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, why DHSC was advertising for a Deputy Director of a Covid Pass.

The Department of Health is advertising for a 'Deputy Director, Delivery Lead – Covid Pass.' I think Sajid was taken by surprise when I asked for an explanation… pic.twitter.com/kSBRieLMIL

— Desmond Swayne (@DesmondSwayne) June 8, 2022

Below is the video included in Swayne’s tweet above.

House of Commons: Desmond Swayne MP & Sajid Javid MP, 8 June 2022

On 8 June, according to Diamond’s Telegram post, the job advert was viewable and open for applications. Sometime between then and midnight yesterday the job had been removed from the Civil Service Jobs site.

Civil Service Jobs, retrieved 9 June 2022

Does that mean that the lucky applicant who got the “Covid Pass Delivery Manager” job being advertised by the NHS a few weeks ago is now out of a job?

https://expose-news.com/2022/06/10/dhsc-removes-job-advert-for-covid-pass-deputy-director/

Croatian MEP: The Huge Inflation We’re Facing is Due to the Insatiable Greed of Blackrock and Vanguard BY RHODA WILSON

BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street are funds that own all key companies in all areas of life – finance, health, media, military industry and wars.

They own assets that are several times larger than the national budgets of countries such as USA, China, Brazil, and India.

They are the ones who run the world and appoint presidents and prime ministers. They are the ones who decide our real lives and the world order.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

“These funds have stakes in all major pharmaceutical, media, arms, transportation companies and banks, which means that they not only own all the major world companies but truly own the world economy,” Mislav Kolakušić MEP said last week in a recorded message to the world.

Mislav Kolakušić is a Croatian lawyer and politician and Member of the European Parliament (“MEP”). 

“The ability to negotiate and control the decisions of states and politicians in every sector makes them more powerful than any president or prime minister in the world be it in the US, France, Germany, Japan, China or India,” he said.

“The fact that we are facing huge inflation, which will hit ordinary citizens the most, is not a regular economic phenomenon but the result of insatiable desire and greed of the owners of these funds that dictate prices from Washington through Paris to Zagreb, managing so-called economic trends.”

Watch Kolakušić’s full message in the video below.

Mislav Kolakušić: BlackRock and Vanguard – corporations that govern the Western world, 2 June 2022 (9 mins)

Further reading:

https://expose-news.com/2022/06/10/mep-the-huge-inflation-is-due-to-blackrock-vanguard/

Prediction: Proxy Dialectical Wars are Coming BY RHODA WILSON

“Anti-trans”. “Antisemitic”. “Racist”. All of these allegations are coming. All of them are false.

Important voices across the US and around the world are being set up to be painted as bigots, portrayed as guilty of hate speech.

Recent events tell me that the corporate oligarchy is about to launch a major smear campaign to defame these voices. It’s really their only last move: it is their swan song.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

EMAIL ADDRESS

SUBSCRIBE


Follow The Exposé’s Official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here

By James Lyons-Weiler

Before the noise comes, know this:

I stand for free speech on all topics in all forums. Period. Those who participate in hate speech show themselves by their speech. Silencing people with false allegations makes the world a more dangerous place because it cheapens the allegations.

People from all walks of life except mass murderers, rapists and paedophiles (and similar) have something to contribute to the discourse. The range of human sentiment can be known and course-corrected via communication based on integrity and our best objective understanding of truth. Rational discourse. Comparison of ideals. Comparison of values. Learning together.

But let me introduce to you a new concept: Proxy dialectical wars. Attacks meant to alienate and silence dissidents who prefer reality-based science, reality-based medicine, reality-based public health policies & practices, and reality-based education are coming. Proxy dialectical wars distract from the main offence (the maiming and killing of people via immune manipulations) with other topics. Note that the added benefit of changing the topic is the alienation and silencing of the messengers.

They will also be conducted in a way in which the accused will be denied any chance to know the accuser(s) and the accused will be thwarted in attempts to defend themselves. The accused will have to sue for libel and slander, so if you care about free speech and defending the reputation of those who will be assaulted, be prepared to help fund their defence.

I don’t speak for every person who speaks out about the risks of pharmaceutical products. But as far as I can tell, and on the record, and let me be clear: those involved in informing the public on the reality of pharma risks are equally concerned about the health of all people across the globe, regardless of race, religion, creed, colour, sexual orientation, level of education, biological sex (karyotype), or preferred pronouns.

More on all of this as soon as the libel and slander take off. We cannot allow those who benefit most from our isolation to continue to drive us apart.

About the Author

James Lyons-Weiler is an American scientist, human rights advocate and CEO of the non-profit Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge (“IPAK”).  He has also authored three books: ‘Ebola: An Evolving Story’, ‘Cures vs. Profits: Success Stories in Translational Research’, and ‘The Environmental and Genetic Causes of Autism’.

You can read more articles by Lyons-Weiler on Substack HERE or his website HERE

https://expose-news.com/2022/06/10/prediction-proxy-dialectical-wars-are-coming/

Members of Congress Demand Answers The use of COVID vaccines for babies and children is about to be decided based on? Robert W Malone MD, MS

Eighteen sitting Congressional members wrote a strong letter to the FDA demanding answers prior to the decision by regulators to approve COVID-19 vaccines for babies and young children aged 6 months to 4 years old. The FDA VRBPAC advisory panel is scheduled to meet on June 15 to discuss authorization and this letter addresses the fact that there are questions and facts that the FDA must consider prior to EUA authorization.

The letter clearly states that COVID-19 poses little risk to babies and young children, that the vaccines have little effectiveness against new variants, that there are many unanswered questions about the safety of the vaccines and that there is evidence of significant adverse events. Therefore, the lawmakers queried the FDA panel as to why these vaccines are necessary for this age cohort.

“The broad approach of the CDC and FDA to date has been a one-size fits all policy—get the vaccine regardless of age, risk factors, the underlying health of the individual, or previous infection,” the members wrote to FDA Commissioner Robert Califf and members of the advisory panel in a June 7 letter obtained by The Epoch Times. “Yet, to date there remain many unanswered questions about these EUA-approved COVID-19 vaccines and only a small percentage of the safety data about these vaccines that are in the possession of the FDA and the manufacturers has been released for review.”

The document states that 68% percent of children aged 1 to 4 have recovered from COVID-19 and that those rates are even higher for older children, according to a cited May 2022 CDC study. The lawmakers note that the rates for natural immunity are even higher now than when the study was conducted, with an estimated 80% of children across all age cohorts being seropositive against COVID. As natural infection yields better protection than vaccination against COVID, plus children who contract COVID-19 have a high survival rate and have little risk of experiencing severe disease, there is little reason to vaccinate at this time.

The lawmakers want the FDA to answer a series of questions before issuing its decision on the EUA requests from Moderna and Pfizer.

The questions below are taken directly from the letter to the FDA (a link to the full letter can be found at the end of the questions). Please make your own interpretations:

1. Why has the FDA been slow to release the hundreds of thousands of pages of data from pre-approved manufacturers studies, post-approval adverse events state, other post-approval manufactures data submitted to the FDA as required by law??

2. What is the FDA doing to expedite the release of this data and when can we expect all of the data in the FDA’S possession on these vaccines to be publicly released?

3. Should the FDA approve EUA COVID vaccines for children under age 5, will the FDA release the data to the public with 14 days of approval that served as the basis for FDA EUA approval? If not, why not? If not within 14 days, when will the FDA release all of this data to the public?

4. When will the FDA and CDC provide the public with more details on those children who have had the most serious adverse outcomes from COVID-19 infections?

As of ‘April 2022, the CDC reported 484 COVID-related deaths among children ages five and under (over a two+ year period). According to the CDC there are about 24,000"deaths overall in children ages 0-5 annually. Each of these deaths is tragic for these families and society. As the FDA and CDC consider COVID vaccine policies, we believe it is important to understand facts related to these COVID-related deaths, including any underlying conditions that may have been a factor in their death. This is important data for parents, health care providers and public health officials so that they can make fully informed decisions about the best healthcare decision for each child, particularly if the child is seropositive and has no other known risks for adverse outcomes from COVID. It is also noteworthy that as the older population has seen increasing hospitalizations and death with waves of COVID cases, CDC cumulative data show significantly less adverse impact on children under age five even during such waves.

5. What are the cardiac risk factors in administering these EUA COVID vaccines to children? As COVID vaccines were administered to larger numbers of those ages 5-18, public health officials began to notice a previously unknown risk factor related to cardiac inflammation, pericarditis and myocarditis in particular. Not only have there been a number of deaths but the long-term effects of those who suffered cardiac-related inflammation are as yet unquantified by public health officials.

  6. Why has the FDA recently lowered the efficacy bar for COVID vaccines for youngest children? This change significantly lowers the expected benefits from any COVID vaccination recommendation for young children and of particular concern given that over 70% of this age cohort are already seropositive. Recall that when FDA gave EUA approval to COVID vaccines for those ages16 and older, it did so based on data demonstrating over 90%’ effectiveness in “preventing confirmed COVID infection.” We now know that the efficacy is considerably lower.

7. The FDA decided to evaluate effectiveness of this vaccine on a measurement of neutralizing antibodies to the original SARS-CoV2 spike protein. What evidence does FDA have if any that “immunobridging” is an adequate surrogate to the disease prevention metrics used for previous EUAs? Please explain and provide us with FDA data that demonstrates the correlation between immunobridging and disease prevention comparisons between vaccinated and unvaccinated children.

8. Is it a possibility that administering the proposed COVID vaccines in young children could predispose them for increased risk from future novel COVID variants? These COVID vaccines were developed using the original SARS-CoV-2 strain and published studies indicate that vaccine efficacy wanes after subsequent doses and as new COVID variants arise in the population.

9. World renowned immunologists have raised concerns about the possibility of antibody dependent enhancement phenomenon (ADE) resulting form COVID vaccines, noting that ADE was a problem in unrelated COV vaccine trials. What studies has the FDA relied upon when examining the possibility of ADE resulting from EUA COVID vaccines in children ages five and under, or any age group for that matter? Will the FDA affirm with 100% certainty that ADE is not a risk factor for children receiving this vaccine?

10. If approved and widely used amount children age five and under, how many lives does the FDA estimate will be saved in the age group over the next year? Given the injuries reported in the FDA’s own VAERS system, how will the FDA evaluate potential tradeoffs of serious vaccine injuries versus serious COVID outcomes?

11. If approved, what does FDA estimate will be the cost of administering these vaccines to this age group?

12. CDC reports ”seropositivity of 68% of children 1-4 years, 77% for those 5-11, and 74% children ages 12-17. With two additional COVID waves since this data was reported and corresponding increases in seropositivity, what percentage does the FDA consider herd immunity?

13. According to the FDA, how many children ages five and under with pre-existing medical conditions have died from COVID or its variants?

14. According to the FDA, how many healthy children ages five and under without pre- ‘existing medical conditions have died from COVID or its variants?

15.According to the FDA, how many children ages five and under with pre-existing medical conditions have been hospitalized due to (not with)COVID or its variants?

16. According to the FDA, how many healthy children ages five and under without pre- existing medical conditions have been hospitalized due to (not with)COVID or its variants?

17. According to the FDA, how many children ages five and under with pre-existing medical conditions that have required treatment due to COVID or its variants?

18. According to the FDA, how many healthy children ages five and under without pre- existing medical conditions have required treatment due to COVID or its variants?

19.Please list the medical emergencies of children 0 to 4 years old that enables the FDA to approve the COVID vaccine for children using its EUA.

The data show that the risk of serious adverse outcomes of r COVID for shiclren five and under is very low and as such the standard for evaluating EUA interventions must be very high.

We believe each question raised about is not just important, but essential questions for the FDA, VRBPAC and the CDC when it comes to doing a thorough job of evaluating the potential benefits and potential risks of thes vaccines for which you have been asked to consider granting an Emergency Use Authorization.

Signed by:

the following Members of Congress

That this letter is necessary and that it is signed by 18 sitting members of Congress is a strong inditement about the state of the FDA. It is shocking that such a letter should be needed.

These members of Congress have the integrity to do what is right. These are elected officials who represent us, who have the courage to stand up and try to make a difference. I am sure most of these members of Congress need Pharma dollars to get elected - it is not in their personal interest to write such a letter. They are doing this because it is important and the right thing to do.

Now let’s hope that the FDA actually listens to their “supervisors,” that is - Congress.

Congressional oversight refers to the power of the United States Congress to monitor and, if necessary, change the actions of the executive branch, which includes many federal agencies. The primary goals of congressional oversight are to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse and to protect civil liberties and individual rights by ensuring that the executive branch complies with the laws and the Constitution. Derived from its “implied” powers in the U.S. Constitution, public laws, and House and Senate rules, congressional oversight is one of the key elements of the American system of checks and balances of power among the three branches of government: executive, congressional, and judicial.

Let us hope that the FDA answers the questions posed honestly and forthrightly. That they then actually use these questions and the obvious answers to make the decision to not grant an EUA for COVID vaccines for babies and young children. The FDA should do this on the clear and compelling evidence that these vaccines are not needed, as clearly documented in the letter. It is time to put the “emergency use authorization” powers away.

The emergency over -

Who is Robert Malone is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/members-of-congress-demand-answers?s=r

Missouri Gov. Signs New Law Protecting Physicians when they Prescribe Ivermectin

Missouri Governor Mike Parson signed into law yesterday protections for healthcare providers from attacks, such as attempts to take their medical licenses when they prescribe off-label, Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs, including ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine. While the mainstream media, such as St. Louis Public Radio, immediately emphasizes that the drugs “have not been shown to be effective in treating COVID-19,” the recent bill was signed ensuring prescribing doctors aren’t subject to formal usurpation of their ability to practice medicine. 

As reported by St. Louis Public Radio, the protective language was included in a bill addressing professional licensing regulations and lacked exposure during the Governor’s recent public news announcement signing the legislation. Meaning, the Governor didn’t mention the contentious off-label drugs that were attached to the bill.

Known as HB2149, now when a doctor or pharmacist, for example, “lawfully” prescribes or dispenses ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine, they cannot be disciplined by licensing bodies in the state such as the State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts or Board of Pharmacy, writes Tessa Weinberg for the Missouri Independent, part of States Newsroom, a network of news outlets supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Missouri Independent maintains editorial independence. 

Last month, TrialSite reported that the Missouri lawmakers signed this same legislation that needed the Governor’s signature—which they got yesterday.

With this legislation, not only are prescribing physicians protected but also pharmacists cannot second guess a prescribing physician unless “the physician or patient inquires of the pharmacist” themselves about their effectiveness, reports Weinberg.

Democrats Countered

While this bill was driven by Republicans, select state Democrats mounted a counter-effort, which was led by Rick Brattin, R-Harrisonville, who was successful in ensuring the bill was attached in April. As Weinberg and others have noted, Brattin felt he had to include such an amendment because he needed to ensure “the weaponization of the board of healing arts does not occur with our physicians” over the two medications he reported have become “extremely politicized.”

This, of course, is a response to the aggressive tactics physicians and pharmacy licensing boards have taken to stop what they call the spread of misinformation about COVID-19 treatments. TrialSite reported that the FDA communicated with the federation of pharmacy and physician licensing boards to put pressure on state licensing boards.

Sen Jill Schupp, D-Creve Coeur, went on the record, “I think that this kind of legislation to me is very short-sighted.” The FDA has taken an unusually proactive stance against the tradition of local physicians making local decisions with consenting patients.

https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/missouri-gov.-signs-new-law-protecting-physicians-when-they-prescribe-ivermectin-19247ce3

Is the Deadly Neurological Condition Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Linked to COVID-19 Vaccination?

A quite rare, but very fatal neurodegenerative disease called Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) leads to death within a year of diagnosis. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), this condition is triggered by the presence of the prion protein, a folded cellular glycoprotein that transmit its misfolded shape onto other normal variants of the same protein. While it’s not known what causes a normal protein to misfold, scientists do suspect that the abnormal three-dimensional structure confers infectious properties, collapsing neighboring protein molecules into the same form. With cases of CJD occurring at about one case per million, it was surprising to recently read about a cluster of such cases in France and other surrounding countries in Europe. From 1992 to 2019, only 28 cases of CJD were diagnosed in France. However, right after the COVID-19 vaccination program’s implementation in France, according to one recent study, 26 persons died because of this rare neurodegenerative disorder. This significant anomaly got the attention of a mathematician and computer scientist from Bordeaux University as well as two specialist-physicians from France as well as Switzerland. The trio of prominent researchers, including a controversial Nobel Prize winner now deceased, reported that all prion research in France had been frozen since “the death of technicians from French public research facilities.” Seemingly bizarre, not to mention disturbing, Jean Claude Perez, Ph.D., who retired after a career with IBM European Research center on Artificial Intelligence from Bordeaux, France, teamed with Drs. Clair Moret-Chalmin, a neurologist from Clermont, France, and the recently deceased and famous Luc Montagnier to conduct a study investigating whether prion regions were associated with the SARS-CoV-2 original strain and variants as well as any relation to the vaccines themselves. The study authors purport finding not only a cluster of CJD cases post COVID-19 vaccination, but data points indicating presence of a prion region both in the original wildtype SARS-CoV-2 strain and all material variants except, paradoxically, Omicron.

A brief note on Dr. Montagnier: He was a famous, highly accomplished, and respected French virologist who won the Nobel Prize for his discovery of HIV—among other awards and prizes--and worked at the prominent Pasteur Institute in Paris while also working as a professor at Shanghai Jiao Tong University in China. During the pandemic, Dr. Montagnier was labeled a “conspiracy theorist” for suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 was created in a lab, possibly deliberately, and he was relentlessly chastised for operating outside his freeway lane of expertise during the pandemic before he met unfortunate death earlier this year at the age of 89.

At times during this pandemic, the conspiracy theory tag has been used by various groups to immediately attack any scientific figures that didn’t sign off on what was considered “the science” during the formative stages of the pandemic. For example, the genesis of SARS-CoV-2 is widely believed to be zoonotic, however, there is no proof of that as of present. The scientific community has yet to determine the origin of SARS-CoV-2 despite a mission sent over to Wuhan, China, by the World Health Organization, for example.

Regarding the subject of this article: The CDC classifies two varieties of CJD, including the “classical,” which results via spontaneous protein misfolding in the brain, as well as variant CJD (vCJD) caused by exposure to the same prion that triggers mad cow disease. Currently, there are no treatments for CJD, a “universally fatal” condition, and the actual type of CJD is only known after a post-mortem diagnosis of brain tissue. 

French Lab Shutdown

In July of last year, the French government announced the suspension of all prion research across the country.

A formal government press release translated into English declared, “Provisional suspension of work on prions in French public research laboratories.” This was a nationwide, at least temporary, halt on this work based on the collective decision from leadership at ANSES, CEA, CNRS, INRAE, and INSERM in conjunction with the Ministry of Higher Education, Research, and Innovation for at least a period of three months. This, again, was the result of a possible case of the rare but deadly CJD in a prion research laboratory.

Apparently, a retired lab professional from INRAE was suffering from CJD, and according to the formal French government notice, “This could be a second case of infectious CJD affecting scientists who worked on prions, after the first case of an assistant engineering who died of the disease in 2019, and had been injured in 2010 during an experiment.”

This high-risk French research was supporting important public health perogatives in France: advancing the understanding of the functioning of “these infectious pathogens,” and contributing to results that the leadership believes transferrable to other related neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinsons.

The Study Summary

In a preprint study published in ResearchGate, the three scientists set out to investigate any association of COVID-19 vaccination and CJD. Performing literature reviews and conducting two complementary methods of prion analysis, the investigators discuss the presence of a prion region in sampled spike proteins in both the original wildtype variant of SARS-CoV-2 and “all of its successive variants, but also all of the ‘vaccines’ built on this same sequence of the Spike SARS-CoV2 from Wuhan.”

The France-based authors shared that their complementary methods included the use of PLAAC software (Lancaster et al., 2014), supporting the detection and sequencing of amino acids, allowing for the detection of regions likely to develop a prion function. They also utilized a “Master Code of DNA” (Perez, 2009, 2015), (Perez & Montagnier, 2021), supporting the reinforcement of the hypothesis of possible prion function. This latter approach offers a framework to investigate select structures of patterns of the curves of the Master Code, unifying the genomic and proteomic signatures of the considered sequences.

The prominent French authors establish that nearly 50 cases, seemingly “spontaneous emergence of CJD, have appeared in France and Europe very soon after the injection of the first or second dose of Pfizer, Moderna, or AstraZeneca vaccines.”

In identification of what the investigators deem an enigma associated with one variant, they write, “With a density of mutations 8 times greater than that of the rest of the spike, the possible harmfulness of this prion region disappears completely in the Omicron variant.” Attempting to answer this former paradox, the French and Swiss trio analyzed the combination of cases of CJD occurring in Europe between the first dose of either Pfizer or Moderna (both mRNA-based vaccines) with the sudden presentation of CJD.

Scientists Communicate with TrialSite

TrialSite reached out to Dr. Jean Claude Perez, requesting a quote. He and Dr. Clair Moret-Chalmin sent TrialSite the following:

We just wanted to add this clarification to the TrialSite News article recounting our research on the emergence of a new, rapid form of fatal Creutzfeldt Jakob disease following COVID-19 vaccines.” 

The scientists in France continued in an email:

This article will have been, above all, the ultimate research of my friend, RIP Nobel Prize winner Luc Montagnier, the discoverer of the HIV virus and AIDS. Above all, Luc reared that—beyond the Creutzfeldt Jakob risk for vaccinated adults—this prion disease might reach tomorrow the millions of children on whom this vaccine, useless for them, will have been imposed.”

Discussing their deceased friend and colleague, Dr. Claude Perez and Moret-Chalmin noted, “A few days before his death, Luc, from his hospital bed, continued to suggest advice or avenues to explore our article, such as the attached Table.”  That table is included as part of their findings and presented below.

What follows is a summary of table 2 in the manuscript titled, “Presence of the PRION region in ALL historical SARS-CoV-2 Spikes except Bat RaTG13.

Identification of the main SARS-CoV-2 strain and variants

PRION region amino acids 473-510

Notes

SARS-coV-2 Wuhan

Yes

 

Alpha (UK)

Yes

 

Beta (South Africa)

Yes

 

Gamma (Brazil)

Yes

 

Delta (India)

Yes

 

mRNA vaccines Pfizer

Yes

 

mRNA vaccines Moderna

Yes

 

batRaTG13

No

Prion region totally absent

ScovZC45

Yes (shifted)

In the 50 first amino acids

ScovZXC21

Yes (shifted)

In the 50 first amino acids

 

Summary

Noting that CJD takes years to present symptoms, the team communicated in their preprint the investigation into 26 CJD cases in 2021, but Dr. Claude Perez and Moret-Chalmin acknowledge in the paper that they are not able to explain the cause of the disease.

Probing the known history and pathology of known CJD, the trio compare known science with the anomalous observations “following [COVID-19] vaccinations.”

Regarding the 26 cases of what the investigators purport to be CJD: symptoms associated with CJD emerge on average 11.38 days post the COVID-19 jab. As of the writing of their paper, which TrialSite reminds is not yet peer-reviewed, and thus shouldn't be cited as scientific or medical evidence, 20 of the subjects of this retrospective died on average 4.76 months after the vaccination event. Of that number, 8 of the subjects experienced a sudden death, which according to the authors, presents as a “new form of CJD” as compared to a classical form of the disease which emerges after decades.

Other Research & Discussions

Are there other scientific medical discussions centering on prions, CJD, and the COVID-19 vaccines? What follows is a brief summary of sample research involving the two topics.

CJD Death after second Pfizer Dose in American Hospital

Interestingly, a case series study conducted at a prominent American health system reveals a case of CJD after COVID-19 vaccination. Led by Andrea J Folds, MD, Melanie-Belle Ulrich, MD, Sann Y Htoo, MD, and Anjeza Chukus, MD, all affiliated with HCA Healthcare Department of Internal Medicine and/or HCS Healthcare Aventura Hospital, authored the research paper titled, Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease After Receiving the Second Dose of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.

This American team found conclusive evidence that a 64-year-old woman presented with symptoms associated with CJD after the second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA-based vaccine. The authors wrote, “After extensive investigation, conclusive evidence identified the fatal diagnosis of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.”

Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Foundation POV

Recently, the Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Foundation (CJD Foundation) published “Is there any relation between the COVID-19 vaccine and CJD?” The foundation shares a clip of the video from the 2021 Virtual CJD Foundation Family Conference session, including Ryan Maddox, Ph.D., an epidemiologist in the Prion and Public Health Office of the National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases at the CDC, and Brian Appleby, MD a physician affiliated with the foundation that spoke at the CJD foundation.

Dr. Appleby asked the CDC expert if there is a connection between COVID-19 vaccination and CJD. The CDC epidemiologist shared that COVID-19 didn’t hit the scene until late 2019. He suggested that “realistically, there is no biological explanation that would relate PRION disease to COVID-19,” and that relates to the COVID-19 vaccine as well.

Maddox suggests given 85% (at the time) of the elderly population in the U.S. is vaccinated, and that some of that population will be developing prion disease, that they may overlap but don’t likely causally connect. However, Appleby reiterated further, continuing to push the subject that clearly seemed uncomfortable to Maddox, that some cases are reported where CJD symptoms sporadically emerge directly after COVID-19 vaccination. Is this pure chance, wondered Appleby?

Maddox, at the end of the clip, concedes that it's certainly possible that spontaneous CJD-like symptoms could emerge directly after COVID-19 vaccination. The clip can be found here. For more of Maddox’s perspective on CJD in America, listen to this clip.

A Turkish Cautionary Note

While this occurred in France, another set of scientist-physicians out of Pamukkale University in Turkey at the end of 2021 also reported on a possible correlation between prions and COVID-19 vaccination. Titled “Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease After the COVID-19 Vaccination,” and led by corresponding author Dr. Anil Kuvandk, the team report an observation of increasing neurological problems associated with “the clinical presentation of COVID-19,” noting the reported manifestations appear “to be a combination of nonspecific complications of the systemic disease, inflammation of the cerebrovascular system, and the effects of a direct viral infection.”

In this case series at Pamukkale University’s anesthesiology intensive care units, the physician-scientists observed a patient died from neurological findings that developed after vaccination with the CoronvaVac vaccine, the COVID-19 vaccine developed by China’s Sinovac. The authors suggest, “In cases where rapidly progressive neurological disorders are observed, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease should be considered, and the role of immunity-related condition in the progression of the disease should be investigated.”

Final Thoughts

A physician affiliated with the CJD Foundation expressed concerns last year of reports of presenting CJD directly after COVID-19 vaccination. Moreover, a case series at a major U.S. health system confirmed the death of a 64-old woman due to CJD after vaccination with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine known as BNT162b2. Turkish physician-scientists caution that based on their case series study, when persons die after COVID-19 or the vaccine with associated CJD symptoms, then that rare neurodegenerative disease should be investigated. The recent preprint study authored by a well-known French mathematician/computer scientist and two French-speaking physician-scientists--one a famous figure who discovered HIV and recently passed away-- link the original wildtype SARS-coV-2 strain and all ensuing variants, except Omicron to prion regions associated with the misfolded protein seen in CJD. Perez, Moret-Chalmin, and Montagnier (RIP) probed the literature, finding over a dozen post-COVID-19 deaths purportedly linked to CJD. The trio also conducted sequencing analyses of associated prion regions to all COVID-19 variants (except Omicron) and the mRNA-based vaccines as well. An anti-vax fishing expedition or worthwhile investigation? We think real science suggests the latter. While the findings herein certainly do not represent sufficient hard evidence of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccination and CJD, the topic does warrant further investigation. While critical inquiry into the COVID-19 vaccines is still frowned upon among many elite academic medical circles, we believe there are sufficient red flags associated with the mass vaccination programs, benefits aside, warranting further investigation on multiple scientific fronts, including this one.

https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/is-the-deadly-neurological-condition-creutzfeldt-jakob-disease-linked-to-covid-19-vaccination-2a5eff87

CREEPY FOOD SURVEILLANCE: Norway launches new monitoring scheme to track all food purchases of private citizens Wednesday, June 08, 2022 by: Ethan Huff

(Natural News) Statistics Norway (SSB), which operates the Nordic country’s data collection operations, now has a new task that involves tracking the food purchasing habits of Norwegians.

According to reports, the SSB will force all private companies – not just public ones – to hand over data on what foods people in Norway are buying, and in what quantities.

NRK says that the SSB, which collects, produces and communicates statistics related to the Norwegian economy at the national, regional and local levels, will essentially become a Big Brother entity to surveil, track and report on what Norwegians are doing at the grocery store.

“In Norway every citizen is linked to their fødselnummer (birth number), and thus the SSB is well-informed about what individuals earn, their taxes due and their criminal records,” reports Free West Media.

“But it appears that the SSB does not yet know enough about their subjects. It has ordered Norway’s major supermarket chains NorgesGruppen, Coop, Bunnpris and Rema 1000 to share all their receipt data with the agency. Nets, the payment processor that is responsible for 80 percent of transactions related to supermarket purchases, will also need to provide data.”

In a statement, the SSB explained that a link between a payment transaction made with a debit card and a grocery receipt will enable the entity to link a payment transaction and receipt for more than 70 percent of all grocery purchases in Norway.

If you use a loyalty card or take advantage of digital coupons, your grocery purchasing habits are already being tracked

According to the SSB, it needs to track all Norwegians’ grocery shopping habits in order to better design tax policy, adjust social assistance, and award child allowance payments to households.

The methods proposed are “a less time-consuming way” of obtaining the necessary data, the entity says, versus other methods that would be more difficult and invasive.

In 2012, Norwegian households were instructed to list grocery purchases in a paper booklet and submit it to the SSB. That method was prone to errors, however, which is why the entity now wants to go digital.

“When the purchases are linked to a household, it will be possible in the consumption statistics to analyze socio-economic and regional differences in consumption, and link it to variables such as income, education and place of residence,” the SSB further says.

Retailers, meanwhile, are pushing back against the plan. NorgesGruppen announced plans to appeal the SSB decision and ask the Norwegian Data Protection Authority for guidance on the matter. Nets expressed concerns “about the collection and compilation of data that may be problematic and intrusive for the individual citizen.”

Coop spokesman Harald Kristiansen similarly expressed reservations about the scheme, stating that while the SSB may be acting in good faith, the implications of the new tracking methods are too concerning to let slip by without a fight.

Truth be told, the grocery purchasing habits of everyone, regardless of where they live, are already being tracked – that is, for customers who use things like loyalty cards or digital coupons.

“Many consumers already make available all their purchase data to supermarkets and other retailers in the form of loyalty programs and cards,” Free West Media explains.

“While consumers are offered discounts, supermarkets in turn gain access to valuable information about individual purchasing habits and preferences … But the big difference between these loyalty programs and the SSB proposal is that supermarket loyalty programs are optional.”

For many years, now, the general public has been getting groomed to accept mass surveillance by the government as normal. Even the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) plandemic was used as an excuse to pry into people’s private lives.

More related news on this topic can be found at Surveillance.news.

Sources for this article include:

FreeWestMedia.com

NaturalNews.com

https://naturalnews.com/2022-06-08-norway-launches-surveillance-scheme-track-food-purchases.html