Shanghai in CHAOS as residents rush to flee the city following rollback of COVID-19 restrictions Friday, June 03, 2022 by: Arsenio Toledo

(Natural News) The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has officially rolled back most of its Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) restrictions in Shanghai. But this sudden relaxation of restrictions only created chaos as residents en masse packed up their bags and fled the city amid concerns that Beijing could force them back into their homes.

Shanghai’s 25 million residents spent 76 days almost entirely inside their homes due to the CCP’s failed “zero-COVID” strategy of dealing with COVID-19 outbreaks. (Related: China censoring videos of people being dragged out of their homes and into quarantine camps.)

On Tuesday, May 31, the Communist Party Shanghai Committee, the city’s most powerful political body, published a letter online claiming that the lockdown was successful and thanked the citizens for their “support and contributions.”

The lockdown officially ended at midnight on June 1. The end of the lockdown was met with celebrations, with residents going on Chinese social media websites to post videos of people taking their cars out for the first time in months, going out for food and drinks and hanging out on popular sites around the city.

“Just like the lockdown in the beginning, the unlocking also came suddenly,” said Daphne, a Taiwanese marketing specialist who has lived for years in Shanghai because of work. “Everyone has a feeling of ecstasy and disbelief, and many communities were setting off firecrackers and fireworks.”

In the morning, the celebrations turned into scenes of exodus as residents packed up their bags to leave the city as many remained anxious that the CCP or the local communist party could reverse the rollback of restrictions at any moment.

Videos coming out of Shanghai show the city’s main train station packed with residents waiting to board trains to flee the city. The station’s underground parking lot turned into an impromptu campsite filled with people waiting sometimes days ahead of their scheduled trains.

Those who could not board trains or buses and did not have cars were seen trekking miles across the city’s main highways with their luggage.

Many Shanghai neighborhoods put residents back into lockdown just a day after restrictions eased

The fears of those rushing to flee Shanghai are not unfounded. Municipal authorities warned that the reopening was conditional on COVID-19 infections not increasing.

Within a day after the rollback, city health officials announced the discovery of seven new COVID-19 cases in four neighborhoods in the districts of Pudong and Jing’an. These neighborhoods were immediately sealed off and designated as “medium-risk areas.”

Neighborhood officials and volunteers acted quickly to quarantine at least 26 close contacts and over 100 secondary contacts. Nearly half a million people were also forcibly tested for COVID-19.

On the same day, some neighborhoods also voluntarily locked themselves down. One neighborhood even reportedly fenced itself off after a positive case walked through one of its streets.

Community volunteers in these neighborhoods are reportedly taking matters into their own hands to enforce restrictions following warnings from municipal authorities that they will be severely punished if residents return with infections.

In the sub-district of Weifang in the eastern Pudong District, near the Lujiazui financial and business zone, neighborhood officials enforced a so-called “static management” order. Residents were required to remain at home despite the end of the lockdown. The movements of medical personnel and delivery workers were also restricted.

“There are still risks that the virus could lead from the quarantine areas to communities,” said Meng Tianying, a senior executive for the Shanghai-based healthcare consultancy firm Domo Medical. “The city government has strengthened virus controls to make sure that the time frame for lifting the lockdown can be implemented in a smooth way.”

For the latest news about China, head over to CommunistChina.news.

Watch this montage from InfoWars showing clips of Shanghai reopening and its residents fleeing in fear of COVID-19 restrictions returning.

Man with rare Fragile X syndrome tricked lesbians into delivering 15 low-IQ children Saturday, June 04, 2022 by: Ethan Huff

(Natural News) Go ahead and file this one in the strange category.

A 37-year-old man from the United Kingdom with a rare and incurable genetic condition reportedly impregnated multiple lesbians, delivering to them 15 children collectively, without first informing them that the offspring would turn out to have developmental delays and low IQ.

The lesbians responded to social media posts that James MacDougall shared about offering up his services to LGBTs wanting to have children. After doing the deed, MacDougall tried to gain legal access to the children, only to be called out for deceiving the lesbians into bearing his genetically damaged children.

A Family Court battle that MacDougall had hoped would result in him being awarded access to four of the children essentially backfired. He initially signed an agreement saying he did not want access to the children but later changed his mind.

After trying to pursue the issue further through legal means, MacDougall received a smackdown from Mrs. Justice Lieven, sitting at Derby, who ruled that he should not have access to his children because it might cause them harm.

The judge also announced in a highly unusual move that MacDougall’s name should be plastered all over the place to protect other women from falling victim to his low-IQ spawn. (Related: Remember back in late 2019 when Hollywood pandered to lesbians by depicting Jesus Christ as a lesbian woman?)

This would all be hilariously ridiculous if children were not involved

We are told in media reports that MacDougall wanted to be a sperm donor but could not go through a normal clinic because he has Fragile X syndrome. So instead, he privately offered his services online to unsuspecting lesbians.

One lesbian, a 25-year-old, contacted MacDougall, mated with him, and bore not one but two children. At the time, MacDougall procured her with a three-page document that was filled with “legalistic language,” obfuscating his true intentions.

The essence of the document was an agreement that MacDougall would not have any rights over the children, including the right to contact them. The document also explained on page 3 that MacDougall does, in fact, have Fragile X syndrome.

The 25-year-old lesbian claims she has “problems reading” and is “extremely vulnerable,” and failed to notate all these things before signing. She admitted in court that she did not “read that far” into the agreement before affixing her signature to it.

After the lesbian gave birth to the first child, she contacted MacDougall, who had already been visiting regularly, in order to petition him for a second child. This is when things got even weirder.

The lesbian claims that MacDougall made inappropriate sexual comments to her, rubbed his genitalia against her, and showered with the child several times. On another occasion, he reportedly attacked her and bruised her neck and back.

The now-three-year-old, meanwhile, cannot talk and demonstrates “challenging” behavior. And now the lesbian has a second child, a boy, who will likely develop the same brain and behavior problems.

To make a long story short, MacDougall tricked a number of lesbians into letting him impregnate them, with both parties selfishly trying to get children out of it for their own satisfaction and pleasure. Now, real-life children have been brought into the world in the most screwed-up of circumstances.

“Yup, let’s completely ignore societal conventions that have been in place since the dawn of civilization for the creation and welfare of children,” wrote someone at the Daily Mail (UK) sarcastically. “WHAT COULD POSSIBLY GO WRONG?”

Another expressed sorrow for the children, lamenting the fact that they have had a “completely dreadful start in life.”

“Sadly,” this person added, “I blame the mothers for putting their needs before that of a child.”

More related news stories can be found at Twisted.news.

Sources for this article include:

DailyMail.co.uk

NaturalNews.com

https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-06-04-man-fragilex-tricked-lesbians-low-iq-children.html

Russia transitioning from “special operation” in Ukraine to taking aim at all of NATO in sweeping “demilitarization” move Saturday, June 04, 2022 by: Ethan Huff

(Natural News) The United States is flooding Ukraine with so many weapons that Russia has announced that it must take a more global approach to its “special operation” in Ukraine.

Instead of just dealing with the globalist problem in that country, Russia quickly realizes that all of NATO is its enemy. The axis of evil is much greater than just Ukraine’s puppet government is a simple way of putting it.

“I have some unpleasant news,” said Olga Skabeeva on the Russian state TV program 60 Minutes. “Even though we are methodically destroying the weapons that are being delivered [to Ukraine], the quantities in which the United States are sending them force us to come up with some global conclusions.”

“Perhaps it’s time to acknowledge that maybe Russia’s special operation in Ukraine has come to an end, in a sense that a real war had started: WWIII,” she added. “We’re forced to conduct the demilitarization not only of Ukraine but of the entire NATO alliance.”

These are big words, but ones that have been written on the wall for quite some time now. Many could see that this was moving towards World War III once NATO decided to gang up on Russia for dealing with the Ukraine problem.

Both the United States and Poland, along with other NATO countries such as Germany, have been funneling weapons and other gear into Ukraine as part of a unified front against Russia. This leaves Russia with very little option other than to fight back against the whole shebang.

“Indeed, we need to remember the words of Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, who said that anyone who tries to interfere in the special military operation will pay a heavy price,” added Vladimir Avatkov from Russia’s Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

“We never forget about these words of Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, but a great number of people are already standing in line, trying to interfere in Russia’s special operation on the territory of Ukraine,” Skabeeva quickly interjected.

“Turns out, we have to act – but we’re yet to figure out how we can act without conducting a nuclear strike.”

Russia warns Poland: Mind your own business or your “current borders will be worthless”

During the conversation, Russian parliament member Oleg Matveychev weighed in that if Poland “starts any intervention … its current borders will be worthless,” to which Skabeeva added that it is not just Poland that needs to back off and mind its own business.

“I wasn’t just talking about Poland, but mainly about Great Britain and the United States,” Skabeeva said, adding that “they’re all lined up.”

“No need to rush,” chimed in Avatkov. “There is a line. Everything in its time!”

Poland is simply first in line, according to Russia, because it is said to be moving to seize territories in western Ukraine. The Russian government also claims that Poland is “actively working to dismember Ukraine.”

On Russian state TV, hosts and pundits regularly refer to Ukraine as “the territory formerly known as Ukraine.” They also discuss matters pertaining to the “denazification” of the country, which is one of Russia’s goals with the operation.

“For us, the special military operation is just the first act, an introduction,” said Chairman of the State Duma Committee on Defense Andrey Kartapolov in an interview on Sunday Evening with Vladimir Solovyov.

“The war that is going on right now … it’s not just an economical war and info-war, this war is about our faith. It’s about our right, as the people, to have faith in what we want to believe, to love those we want to love, and to live the way our ancestors would have wanted, on our land and by our birthright.”

More of the latest news about this subject can be found at WWIII.news.

Sources include:

Yahoo.com

NaturalNews.com

https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-06-04-russia-takes-on-nato-sweeping-demilitarization-move.html

First JPMorgan’s Dimon, now Goldman Sachs’ Waldron: the world is about to get hit with an economic “hurricane” Sunday, June 05, 2022 by: Ethan Huff

(Natural News) Another prominent banking executive, John Waldron of Goldman Sachs, is predicting major economic doom in the very near future.

At a recent investor meeting, Waldron echoed the sentiments of JPMorgan’s Jamie Dimon concerning what Dimon called an “economic hurricane” that is about to make landfall.

Joking that he would avoid “using any weather analogies” as Dimon did, Waldron expressed similar fear about inflation, ever-changing monetary policy, and of course,  Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the latter being every Western influencer’s favorite scapegoat for what is now unfolding.

“This is among – if not the most – complex, dynamic environments I’ve ever seen in my career,” Waldron told investors. “The confluence of the number of shocks to the system to me is unprecedented.”

One of the harshest critics of the Federal Reserve in the banking world, Waldron says he expects that there will be “tougher economic times ahead” than even the current inflation and shortage crisis that we are all seeing and feeling.

“No question we are seeing a tougher capital markets environment,” he explained.

Concerning the merger market, Waldron says he expects a slowing from the current “resilient” levels.

“That’s going to start to roll over because you see demand destruction, CEOs get a little less confident,” Waldron explained. “That’s a reasonable expectation, but we’re watching that carefully as a signal.”

From mid-October to late April, global macro data seemed to be moving in a somewhat positive direction, which some saw as a possible turnaround. All of that changed suddenly, however, when the Citi Economic Surprise Index plummeted from over 50 just a few months ago to around 8.60 as of this writing.

Is the “everything” bubble about to burst?

For most of this nation’s history under the oppressive rule of private central banking (the Fed), inflation has technically always been a problem. It is just that it remained hidden because of fancy tricks and tools that were designed to keep the masses confused and distracted while the value of the dollar eroded.

The Fed’s little schemes – which are hardly little at all – are not foolproof, though. Every so often, the bubble inflates too much and they run out of hat tricks to keep it contained, resulting in a crash. We saw this most recently at the start of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) plandemic in 2020, and before that in 2008 with the housing market collapse.

They call these “bubbles,” and at various intervals, these bubbles seem to pop, the big guys are bailed out, and reinflation begins once again. The reality, though, is that the bubbles of the past never fully deflated, and the can of inflation was simply kicked down the road even further.

Currently, we are in the largest bubble of all – the everything bubble to end all bubbles. The crash that is soon to come will be monumental, and this time there is a strong chance that it will not recover.

This time, we are likely to see that ever-ominous “Great Reset” that World Economic Forum (WEF) head Klaus Schwab and others have been warning is soon to come. The current world order, which is mostly built on fiat, will crumble away, leaving a void to be filled by a new world order.

“Western governments have been able to hide inflation, allowing them to spend vast amounts of money,” wrote someone at Zero Hedge about how the fiat printing press aims to keep the house of cards standing, at least for a time.

“Wall Street was able to generate insane amounts of profit by cutting out U.S. labor. The unraveling of all this will be quite a spectacle.”

The latest financial news can be found at DebtBomb.news.

Sources include:

ZeroHedge.com

NaturalNews.com


https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-06-05-jpmorgan-dimon-goldman-sachs-waldron-economic-hurricane.html

Flashback: 1998 Smallpox “War Games” BY RHODA WILSON

A 1998 article published in The Guardian, described a secret meeting of US Federal agencies in March of that year to play out what would happen if terrorists attacked the United States with a hybrid smallpox virus for which there was no cure. 

This article from 1998 caught our attention as it all seems eerily familiar to what we have learned over the past two years regarding pandemic scenarios and the actors involved.

(Related: Monkeypox: Scenarios, Germ Games and Vaccines and Two Studies now suggest the circulating Monkeypox Virus has been manipulated in a Biolab)

The 1998 exercise underlined the need for a sweeping plan that President Clinton was to approve that week. Clinton’s interest in germ warfare was deepened by books and there was one in particular that alarmed him: The Cobra Event by Richard Preston.

The Guardian’s article noted that an expert on genetic engineering, William Haseltine, said that any trained molecular virologist could create such a virus in a laboratory. 

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

EMAIL ADDRESS

SUBSCRIBE


Follow The Exposé’s official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here

1998 was a troublesome year for Bill Clinton. In January 1998, allegedly under the recommendation of the president, Monica Lewinsky filed an affidavit in which she denied ever having had a sexual relationship with him. Within weeks, Lewinsky was taken by FBI agents and U.S. attorneys to a hotel room where she was questioned and offered immunity if she cooperated with the prosecution. A few days later, the story broke, and Clinton publicly denied the allegations, saying, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky.”

Problems were brewing in Iraq. In his 1998 State of the Union Address, Clinton warned Congress that Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein was building an arsenal of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons.  The administration was battling with al-Qaeda.   In August 1998, Clinton ordered cruise missile strikes on targets in Afghanistan and Sudan, targeting the Al-Shifa pharmaceutical factory in Sudan, which was suspected of assisting Osama bin Laden in making chemical weapons.

Preston is still writing books about viral outbreaks. In his latest book, published in 2019, he makes clear that the Ebola outbreak of 2013 and 2014 is a harbinger of further, more severe outbreaks, and of emerging viruses heretofore unimagined in any country, on any continent.

Haseltine has recently written an article on the current pox outbreak. Although we do not cover Haseltine’s recent article here you may be interested to read it to get a feel for his stance as it is now and possibly was back then.

“Poxviruses are back, and it is no surprise,” Heseltine wrote last week. “Climate change and increased globalisation have enabled viruses to mutate and spread at unprecedented rates … Reinstate smallpox vaccinations to target emerging poxvirus strains.”

War games show up germ defences

Clipped from The Guardian, 28 April 1998

One day last month, 40 officials from more than a dozen US federal agencies met secretly in Washington to play out what would happen if terrorists attacked the United States with a devastating new type of germ weapon. The results were not encouraging.

In the scenario, terrorists spread a virus along the Mexican-American border. After doctors diagnosed the epidemic as smallpox vaccines were rushed in to immunise the population, but the virus turned out to be a hybrid for which there was no cure.

As the scenario unfolded, officials playing the role of state and local officials were quickly overwhelmed by a panicked population, thousands of whom were dying, and discovered huge gaps in logistics, legal authority and medical care.

The outcome of the exercise surprised some participants but illustrated what others had long suspected the US, despite huge investments of time, money and effort in recent years, is still unprepared to respond to biological weapons. The exercise, officials said, also underlined the need for a sweeping plan that President Clinton is expected to approve this week.

Mr Clinton’s interest in germ warfare has been deepened by books, aides said. He was so alarmed by one a novel by Richard Preston titled The Cobra Event, which portrays a lone terrorist’s attack on New York City with a genetically engineered virus that he instructed intelligence experts to evaluate its credibility. Experts tend to disagree on the plausibility of such high-technology threats. But most agree that the danger will grow and that such an attack, if successful, could be catastrophic.

Apprehension about germ warfare grew in 1995 as Iraq admitted that it had built a large biological arsenal and was prepared to use it during the Gulf war in 1991. The General Accounting Office, in a report in December, criticised the government for a serious lack of coordination in efforts to counter the terrorist threat. The US government concedes at least some of its failings. According to a draft of an interagency study, government counter-terrorism programmes suffer from a lack of intelligence-sharing and a lack of information about what individual terrorists or groups may be plotting.

William Haseltine, an expert on genetic engineering whom the White House asked to review the scenario, said that it was realistic. “You could make such a virus today,” he said. “Any trained molecular virologist with a really good lab can do it.”

Administration officials said the scenario was intended to inflict a substantial disaster to put strain on the system and reveal any weaknesses.

Among the shortcomings, officials said, were that in such emergencies, hospitals would quickly exhaust supplies of antibiotics and vaccines. One participant said that it was very difficult “to get trained, immunised medical staff into an infected area”.

Washington may now create a national stockpile of vaccines. antibiotics and antidotes.

The smallpox scenario

We were unable to find details online of the smallpox scenario held in “secrecy” in 1998, nor were we able to find details of Heseltine’s review of that scenario.  However, in August 1999 Tara O’Toole of Johns Hopkins School of Public Health wrote a smallpox attack scenario.  She began:

Smallpox virus, which is among the most dangerous organisms that might be used by bioterrorists, is not widely available. The international black-market trade in weapons of mass destruction is probably the only means of acquiring the virus. Thus, only a terrorist supported by the resources of a rogue state would be able to procure and deploy smallpox.

The following scenario is intended to provoke thought and dialogue.

Centres for Disease Control and Prevention: Smallpox: An Attack Scenario, August 1999

In the scenario conclusions O’Toole noted:

Tourist trade, a major source of state income, is at a standstill. Many small businesses in the city have failed because suppliers and customers are reluctant to visit the area. Attendance at theatres and sports events is down markedly. In several states, public schools are dismissed 1 month early, in part because parents, fearful of contagion, are keeping their children home, and partly because teachers are refusing to come to work. Across the country, people refuse to serve on juries or attend public meetings for fear of contracting smallpox. In hospitals and HMOs where staff have not been vaccinated, healthcare personnel have staged protests, and some have walked off the job.

Smallpox continues to spread in many parts of the world, echoing its formerly endemic character. Without a vaccine, the only control method is isolation, which hinders, but cannot halt, the spread of the disease. By year’s end, endemic smallpox is re-established in 14 countries. The World Health Assembly schedules a debate on re-enacting a global smallpox eradication campaign.

Centres for Disease Control and Prevention: Smallpox: An Attack Scenario, August 1999

Richard Preston ramping up the fear

In March 1999, Health Law & Policy Institute published an article which stated:

A rapidly growing body of research suggests that the danger of intentional release of the smallpox virus by various terrorist, or even governmental, organizations is increasing. A recent literature search revealed over 200 publications on related issues during the past two years. This topic was brought into sharper focus in a July article by Richard Preston (The New Yorker, July 12, 1999, pp. 44-61), the author who “popularised” the Ebola virus in his book The Hot Zone. [link included is our own]

In June, experts met in Atlanta to evaluate the possible threats from bioterrorism. Smallpox was unanimously determined to be the greatest threat to the U.S., followed by anthrax.

The growing menace of smallpox used as a weapon of terror confirms the necessity of keeping the virus for research and proceeding on development of a new vaccine and anti-viral drugs with all deliberate speed.

Smallpox and Bioterrorism: A Growing Threat, Health Law & Policy Institute, * March 1999

https://expose-news.com/2022/06/06/flashback-1998-smallpox-war-games/

Covid Data from Around the World in One Day BY RHODA WILSON

Joel Smalley compares data for Sweden to Italy, Austria and Texas.  Dr. Paul Alexander compares data for India, South Africa, Portugal and Australia.  And Gerry O’Neill notices another set of statistics begins to “go south from the ‘Official Ireland’ point of view.”

Meanwhile, just a week ago Medscape reported that the NHS ‘needs 13,000 more beds’ to ease the pressure on emergency care.

Joel Smalley is a British quantitative data analyst, Dr. Paul Elias Alexander is a Canadian health researcher and Gerry O’Neill is an Irishman who has been writing counter-narrative articles for 7 years.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

EMAIL ADDRESS

SUBSCRIBE


Follow The Exposé’s official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here

Sweden from Villain to Hero!

Sweden bucks the trend of post-vax excess mortality. Why?

By Joel Smalley,5 June 2022

I love the way that the people who decried Sweden’s light-touch approach to dealing with Covid pre-vax are now trying to use Sweden as the evidence that the mRNA injections are not necessarily the reason for super-excess mortality since they were introduced.

The suggestion is that the excess is mainly due to the negative effects of the interventions (as if that is somehow more acceptable).

One thing we can agree on is that Sweden has indeed not experienced anywhere near the levels of excess mortality post-vax. Compare these charts to Italy and Austria, for example:

Below is an images slider, click on the arrows on either side of the image or swipe to view the next or previous graph (6 graphs).

PREVIOUSNEXT

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

Given that the increases in excess deaths are closely correlated with Covid mortality, exemplified here in Texas, I think it is less likely that Sweden’s success is due to lower collateral harms of interventions.

In my opinion, it is probably more likely to be due to higher levels of natural immunity that has protected the young recovered (you know, just like centuries of epidemiology suggest is the reason why we haven’t already gone extinct!) but unfortunately not quite enough herd immunity to protect the over 70s from the pernicious impact of the jab.

Perhaps they were lucky enough to get proper training for their immune system before getting it disrupted by the faulty jab, making them less susceptible to original antigenic sin?

India, Portugal and South Africa, Three Nations Behaving Differently

Why have the three nations behaved so differently in recent omicron sub-variant (BA 4/5 waves)? In fact, across the entire pandemic?

By Dr. Paul Alexander, 5 June 2022

Once again, throwing out some data and information for debate. All are welcome to partake as none of us has all the answers and we still try to learn. I do and I am always open to criticism and schooling. I welcome that and yearn to learn daily. We are still trying to understand this and the devastation by these Covid injections, especially the mRNA ones.

Here goes. This goes back to what others and myself have been saying, in that the unvaccinated in the South African population may be benefitting (very likely), especially the younger persons, from the training of their innate immune system from the constant infectious pressure and exposure and re-exposure as the virus is circulating; the innate antibodies (Ab) are becoming trained and learn, in a way a type of ‘memory’ develops though you would know that it is the acquired adaptive immune compartment (systemic compartment) that forms memory (memory B-cells that churn out Abs on re-exposure).

This ‘training’ of innate immunity (Abs) allows the unvaccinated to better cope with exposure and the Abs can sterilise/eliminate the virus. The poly-specific low-affinity, broad, innate Abs are not ‘outcompeted’ or subverted by the antigen highly specific, ‘vaccine induced’ Abs (that are non-neutralising and so only partially if at all, neutralises the virus’ spike).

The proportion of the population vaccinated:

In Portugal on the other hand, the heavily vaccinated (and the population is 80-90% to near 100% vaccinated and boosted) may be contributing to the immune system being subverted and impaired and the non-neutralising or partially neutralising Abs (omicron sub-variants are now largely resistant to the vaccine-induced Abs) are likely binding to the virus but not neutralising (or only partially) the spike (preventing infection). The vaccinal Abs binding to the spike may also block the innate Abs from binding, thus the innate Abs are unable to sterilise the virus, eliminate it or prevent infection. The innate Abs thus lose their functional capacity to sterilise the virus while being subverted and neutralisation is constrained.

Do you see the issue of not coming down to baseline? That infection levels are elevated even after the wave and hangs out there placing tremendous infectious pressure. There is no ‘herd’ immunity when the curves look like this.

Some suggest massive chemoprophylaxis programs societally to reduce the infectious pressure. So that the mounting mass population of non-neutralising Abs have less virus to pressure and thus will have less risk of viral immune escape. What do you think? The problem is societies will not implement that (will not happen) for they still do not ascribe to the potency and role of early treatment and prevention of anti-virals in Covid. So infectious pressure must come down via other means.

Look at India’s curves today, still near flat, infection, cases, deaths. Did their aggressive use of chemoprophylaxis and early treatment pre-omicron, help them stave off infection, cases, and severe outcomes? I say yes.

They also were a nation that benefitted from limited vaccination especially early on (initially, though reports are that they are ramping up vaccination more recently) as there was very massive infectious pressure and their innate immune systems were trained. They are also a much younger population e.g., < 40 years old (South Asian nations are principally younger).

Let us look at South Africa’s recent omicron BA 4 and BA 5 sub-variant experience with a more blown-up graph. See how the peaks get higher each successive curve, they get closer (more rapid) and do not get back to baseline. This is a really huge problem not returning to baseline. Yet see this last 5th wave, it seems that with the least vaccinated South Africa, their population has weathered the 5th wave:

How is Australia doing today with the omi sub-variants? Do you see the issue with the downward side of curves not coming down to baseline?

These two are key studies to keep in mind for further and deeper reading:

Folman et al: “We analysed data from 1,789 participants (1,298 placebo recipients and 491 vaccine recipients) with SARS-CoV-2 infection during the blinded phase (through March 2021). Among participants with PCR-confirmed Covid-19 illness, seroconversion to anti-N Abs at a median follow up of 53 days post-diagnosis occurred in 21/52 (40%) of the mRNA-1273 vaccine recipients vs. 605/648 (93%) of the placebo recipients (p < 0.001).”

This Follmann study shows us alarmingly what the UK data said in week 42, that there was and is subversion of making Abs to the nucleocapsid (a more stable ‘conserved’ protein that envelops the mRNA in the core of the virus) in vaccinated persons. This means natural ‘cellular’ immunity (memory) is being impacted and not being induced in vaccinated persons.

I again draw your attention to the seminal study by Yahi et al. “Infection-enhancing anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies recognize both the original Wuhan/D614G strain and Delta variants. A potential risk for mass vaccination?  The key Yahi finding and thus take away phrase IMO is:

“As the NTD is also targeted by neutralising antibodies, our data suggest that the balance between neutralising and facilitating antibodies in vaccinated individuals is in favour of neutralisation for the original Wuhan/D614G strain. However, in the case of the Delta variant, neutralising antibodies have a decreased affinity for the spike protein, whereas facilitating antibodies display a strikingly increased affinity. Thus, ADE may be a concern for people receiving vaccines based on the original Wuhan strain spike sequence (either mRNA or viral vectors).”

Irish “Death Events” Trending Over 9,000 in Q2 2022

This is nearly 3,000 higher than Q2 2021. Why?

By Gerry O’Neill, 5 June 2022

December 10th was the last week the CSO produced its Covid-19 Insights volume. This in itself is odd as the two months, post-December 10th saw Ireland hit with more cases of the disease than in the previous 18 months combined.

Why did they stop producing these reports?  I suppose we can only go into hypothesis mode now. But one could argue that the statistics were starting to skew badly away from the mainstream narrative.

I bring it up because I have seen another set of statistics begin to go a little bit south from the Official Ireland point of view. The all-cause mortality statistics. As you can see from the below statistics Ireland recorded roughly 1,300 more deaths in 2021 than in 2020.

Now, I’ve seen many people read a lot into this increase but on its own, it doesn’t really tell us much. To my mind, these are very bare comparisons and deaths can be open to non-statistically relevant fluctuations year to year. If these deaths are in some way vaccine-related it was a trickle as opposed to a flood at the end of 2021. Or so it seemed.

However, where things get interesting and more promising for the vaccine sceptic is when you zoom the lens in on Q4 2021. The death statistics for those three months saw an excess of just shy of 1,230 deaths over Q4 2020.

One way of framing that is to say that nearly all of the 2021 surplus deaths occurred in the final quarter of the year. A quarter incidentally when every age cohort had a month or two at least to avail of the double jab. And also, a period when many older people had already begun receiving their third shots.

Again, one quarter of lop-sided death figures could be an anomaly. But it is an interesting thread to pull on nonetheless.

Now, if the hypothesis about the underplayed danger of the vaccines is to survive rigorous examination, we would expect to see the same trend continue in Q1 2022 as we noted in Q4 2021. Unfortunately, we do not yet have the data for Q1 2022 deaths.

However, what we do have though is a very worrying statistic from deathevents.gov.ie. In short, this site records weekly death events in Ireland. This seems to be a rolling 8-week recording of all death events in the country and the information is then distributed to various public bodies.

The Death Events is a service that distributes information on death events to public sector bodies.  This information contains details on all deaths notified to the General Register Office. It is currently updated every Friday at lunchtime.  There are currently 1,309,277 death events published between Dec. 31, 1980, and June 3, 2022.

I assume this register notifies the different government agencies affected by a person’s death so that they may record the fact on various social welfare payment platforms, property registers and revenue systems. And doesn’t yet have enough data to establish the cause of death. So, bear that in mind. But in the past 8 weeks according to this tracker, there have been 5,923 recorded death events in Ireland.

Government of Ireland: Death Events

Now, what we can attempt to do here is compare this most recent 8-week period of deaths with the 13-week Q2 2021 death statistics to see how they match up.

So, in Q2 2021 6,700 deaths were recorded against the 5,923 recorded in the last 8 weeks on the death event tracker. If we assume the same rate of death for the next 5 weeks as the previous 8 weeks and extrapolate that out to a 13-week number for comparison with Q2 2021 and Q2 2020 deaths, it should give us a fair indication of what way deaths are tracking in the state. Up or down. And to possibly see if this Q4 2021 CSO death data was an anomaly or indicative of the beginnings of a new trend. Again, bear in mind this is something of a jump and should only be used for trending purposes.

If we do a mathematical calculation of these death event statistics it indicates that the number of deaths in Ireland for 13 weeks from April 15th out to mid-July 2022 is tracking at over 9,300 deaths for the three months.

This works out at almost 3,000 more deaths than Q2 2021 and even 1,000 more deaths than Q2 2020. Remember too, Q2 2020 was the height of the 1st wave mania and one of the high water-mark Covid-19 death wave periods. Supposedly.

Even if death events were to suddenly stop happening over the next 5 weeks it would be unlikely for this tracker to come under 9,000 come the end of this current 13-week period.

The other point of note is that this is a weekly tracker. While there may be some anomalies week to week it is unlikely to contain a dump of 2021 deaths in it. Or if it does some people in our civil service division need to become part of our unemployment statistics.

Central Statistics Office: Vital Statistics

It would seem we are trending to record more deaths in Q2 of 2022 than even at the height of Covid in Q2 2020 and worryingly looking at 3,000 more deaths in the current quarter than in Q2 2021. Obviously, these figures come with all the usual health warnings but with trends like this, the vaccine doomsayers ain’t going anywhere anytime soon. The death trends in Ireland are helping their hypothesis at the moment and certainly not hurting it.

I’d advise people to start pressurising the CSO in case someone gets it into their head to delay publishing the Q1 2022 vital statistics.

NHS ‘Needs 13,000 More Beds’

Cuts in the number of hospital beds in the UK must be reversed before any significant improvements in emergency medicine and other NHS services can happen, a new report says.

Improvements in A&E waiting times, ambulance response times, and ambulance handover delays depended on providing 13,000 extra hospital beds, matched by appropriate staffing levels, according to the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM).

The RCEM analysis gives various reasons for how this urgent need arose: hospital beds have been lost since 2010; Covid-19 infection controls; and, cuts to mental health beds.  And according to Dr Adrian Boyle, RCEM vice president: “The health service is not functioning as it should and the UK Government must take the steps to prevent further deterioration in performance and drive meaningful improvement, especially ahead of next winter.”

Responding to the report, Pat Cullen, RCN general secretary, said funding for more nurses to staff extra capacity was vital. “Extra beds or whole wards are only safe when there are enough nurses for the patients in them.”  Adding, “a fully funded workforce plan and pay nursing fairly.”

However, a Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: “We recognise the pressure on urgent and emergency care services and we have set out our plan to help tackle the Covid backlog, backed by record investment.

“There are record numbers of doctors, nurses and overall staff working in the NHS, and we have commissioned NHSE [NHS England] to develop a long-term workforce strategy.

“The NHS is taking a range of actions – including providing an additional £50 million of funding to support increased NHS 111 call-taking capacity this year – to help people access urgent care when they need it.”

Read more: NHS ‘Needs 13,000 More Beds’ to Ease Pressure on Emergency Care, Medscape, 31 May 2022

“Increased NHS 111 call-taking capacity this year.” What could be causing that we wonder?

https://expose-news.com/2022/06/06/covid-data-from-around-the-world-in-one-day/

What Klaus Schwab, WEF and WHO Reveal About Genetic Engineering BY RHODA WILSON

A couple of days ago we published an article about a study, an experiment really, where CRISPR-Cas9, a gene-editing tool, was used to manipulate behaviour in hamsters.  Contrary to what the researchers were hoping, the experiment “developed” vicious hamster monsters that turned on littermates of the same sex. 

In our previous article we asked the question: would they do this in humans?  And now we ask: could they, in other words, do they have the ability to modify human behaviour through genetic re-engineering?

Keep these questions in mind as you read, and watch, the following.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

EMAIL ADDRESS

SUBSCRIBE


Follow The Exposé’s official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here

Klaus Schwab’s Genetic Modification

The clip below is an excerpt from a 16-minute interview by Charlie Rose on 13 November 2013.

Rose asked Klaus Schwab: “You want to talk about in this year’s [Davos] conference, in January, mastering the fourth industrial revolution.”

Schwab responded: “If you look into the future, there’s so much going on in technology.  It’s a real revolution … Our life, the pattern of governing societies, will be so much affected with what’s going on in research in innovation … look at big data …”

Rose: “And look at things like artificial intelligence and robots.  Look at things like gene editing, opening a whole new horizon for medical science”

Schwab: “You see the difference of this fourth industrial revolution is it doesn’t change what you are doing.  It changes you, if you take a genetic editing, just as an example.  It’s you who are changing. And of course, this has a big impact on your identity.”

Charlie Rose: Klaus Swab, Gene Editing 2015 (2 mins)

Read more: Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA Incorporates into Human DNA In as Little as Six Hours, A New Study Finds

World Economic Forum’s Genetic Modification

When Chinese researchers first edited the genes of a human embryo in a lab dish, using CRISPR, in 2015, it sparked global outcry and pleas from scientists not to make a baby using the technology, wrote MIT Technology Review in November 2018.

By the time MIT Technology Review had written its article, it may have already been happening.  According to Chinese medical documents posted online in November 2018, a team at the Southern University of Science and Technology, in Shenzhen, had been recruiting couples to create the first gene-edited babies. They planned to eliminate a gene called CCR5 in hopes of rendering the offspring resistant to HIV, smallpox, and cholera.

When we attempted to retrieve the source documents MIT Technology Review linked in their article, HERE and HERE, one had been withdrawn from the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry and the other is now a dead link. 

Lest it should suffer the same fate as the other, we have downloaded a copy of the withdrawn paper from the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry – ‘Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of gene editing with human embryo CCR5 gene’, Southern University of Science and Technology, 8 November 2018 – and attached it below to preserve it.

Evaluation-of-the-safety-and-efficacy-of-gene-editingDownload

After a baby in China that had been genetically modified using CRISPR technology made headlines globally, the WEF raised the topic of ethical guidelines and safety standards they, with their globalist technocratic ideology, would want to establish globally.  Why WEF thinks the public would trust their ethics and standards is beyond comprehension but the discussion touches on some points that confirm how far genetic engineering had gone as far as the panellists were aware.

The discussion panel, moderated by Oliver Cann, consisted of Victor Dzau and Jodi Halpern.  As Dzau mentioned at the outset, the discussion was limited to CRISPR but there are other “genetic techniques.”

 “[CRISPR] is being able to precisely molecular scissor, take out his specific sequence. And now we can even do in single bases. And possibly even replace it … You can apply it in somatic therapy and germline … where the controversy is, is around the germline,” Dzau said. Manipulating embryos or germlines changes generational genetic component makeup and “so the offspring are therefore altered, probably indefinitely, in terms of a genetic makeup.”

Somatic therapy is treating diseases relating to somatic cells which, in biology, are all living matter except the reproductive, or germ, cells. Somatic therapy treats diseases in adults.  Germline gene therapy or engineering aims to place corrected cells inside the germline (e.g., cells of the ovary or testis), it is used to “treat” diseases in the embryo.

“With human germline engineering, we are beginning to seize control of our own evolution, yet we have barely begun to grapple with the consequences.”

Engineering the Human Germline: An Exploration of the Science and Ethics of Altering the Genes We Pass to Our Children, Gregory Stock & John Campbell, 3 February 2000

At timestamp 13:29, a reporter from the New York Times asked a question regarding recent experiments where Chinese researchers had cloned 5 monkeys for which they removed certain genes with the intent to cause serious mental illness.  The question and therefore the answer was framed around the ethics of experimenting on animals in this way. However, in his answer Dzau raised the ethics of other experiments being done:

“There is research now being done on human brain cells implanted into animals where now the concern is you can have human conscious this hybrid research, chimaera research. Right? So, this is a whole field of ethicsargument that needs to be vetted a lot more thorough than we are today.”

At the end of the video, Cann gave the results of a survey which asked the question: does technology has produced more “good” than “harm” in society?  Of the 10,000 respondents, 53% said they believed that technology was responsible for more harm than good.  In other words, a small majority, 53%, in 2019 thought technology causes harm.  It would be interesting to see what the results of such a survey would be today.

WEF: Davos 2019 Gene Editing at the Crossroads, 10 February 2019 (34 mins)

The World Health Organisation’s Genetic Modification

CRISPR-Cas9 and other genome editing tools present researchers with a double-edged capacity to produce great medical advancements and grave harm. Given the promise and perils associated with this powerful new technology, is the global governance of human genome editing desirable? Is it possible?

In March 2021, the World Health Organisation (“WHO”) convened an expert advisory committee on developing global standards for governance and oversight of human genome editing, including somatic as well as germline and heritable approaches.  Once again, with their globalist technocratic ideology, why WHO thinks the public would trust their ethics and standards is beyond comprehension

In the video below, Dr. Robin Lovell-Badge, who served on this WHO committee, and Dr. Hyun discussed the methods of genome editing, applications and “technical problems,” as well as the scientific, ethical, and policy considerations raised by efforts to successfully implement oversight and governance.

Dr. Lovell-Badge’s presentation is technical but there are some concepts which have become familiar to most who have taken an interest in what the experimental gene therapy injections, often referred to as Covid vaccines, contain and do. 

One familiar concept is at timestamp 17:07, Dr. Lovell-Badge explained somatic gene therapy, below are slides relating to this section of his presentation.

Another concept that people may be starting to become familiar with from the “Covid era” is Dr. Lovell-Badges’s explanation of the slide below in regards to gene editing and the role the liver plays.

Beginning at timestamp 22:41 he explained:

“… more recent papers on muscle in mice …if you scale up the amount of virus that you have to introduce from a mouse to that you need for a human, you’d be introducing levels that were really very toxic. And so, there needs to be much more efficient ways of introducing the gene limiting components. Now when you take something like the liver, it turns out that this is much easier. So, the liver will take up things fromthe bloodstream and for example, it will take up these lipid nanoparticles whichyou can use to encapsulate messenger RNA for Cas9 protein analysis …

“… there’re some issues here, of course, if you’re doing a vivo genome editing. You’ve got to know really where everything’s going. So, in this case, you hope it’s targeting the liver. It probably doesn’t matter if it targets other cell types in the body, at least you hope it doesn’t. Except you have to be very careful that it’s not going to target germ cells because then you might inadvertently have a situation where you’ve got inheritable genome editing, of a sort, that you wouldn’t want to have because probably embryos mutant in this gene wouldn’t develop very well.”

https://expose-news.com/2022/06/06/what-klaus-schwab-wef-who-and-engineering/