Climate TRACE: A Framework for ESG Initiatives and Social & Climate Credit System

In an appearance at the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2022, climate-grifter, Al Gore, took the opportunity to, once again, tout Climate TRACE, a coalition backed by the former Vice President and former Google CEO, Eric Schmidt.  In response to a comment made by WEF panelist, Lea Wermelin, on the responsibility of governments to make structural changes in our economy to combat climate change, Gore replied, “I have good news on this front.  We are about to enter an age of radical transparency.  I have been among those who have formed a new coalition called ‘Climate TRACE’…Tracking Real-time Atmospheric Carbon Emissions.  It’s a coalition of artificial intelligence technology companies, NGOs, and universities, using data from 300 existing satellites from multiple countries, ground, sea and air-based censors, and internet data streams, to use machine-learning to create algorithms for every single sub-sector of the economy.” This colossal data-collection project aims to replace the current self-reporting system of greenhouse gas emissions by countries and companies, who have committed to net zero goals, by publishing reports of climate offenders so that countries, companies, and even individuals can be “held accountable.”  The Google-backed AI algorithm used by Climate TRACE appears to lay the framework for enforcing ESG initiatives heavily pushed by financial behemoths such as BlackRock, as well as a technocratic social and climate credit system.

A Framework for ESG Initiatives

BlackRock CEO, Larry Fink, has made no attempts to hide his plans to demolish the current economy through environmental, social and governance (ESG) standards.  In his 2021 letter to CEOs, Fink remarked, “It’s important to recognize that net zero demands a transformation of the entire economy.” Since Larry Fink issued a letter to CEOs in 2020, which focused on BlackRock’s shift from shareholder capitalism to stakeholder capitalism, by assessing companies based on ESG initiatives, corporations have been falling in line with Blackrock’s ‘woke’ climate agenda.  However, Al Gore warned his fellow climate activists at the WEF 2022 Annual Meeting that, “greenwashing,” or the act of falsely claiming to be environmentally sustainable, “is a major obstacle to solving the climate crisis.  It is made up of falsehoods, clever PR, and it has to stop.” Of course, Gore presents his Climate TRACE framework as the perfect solution and has stated that investors (such as BlackRock), could potentially use this technocratic system to hold corporations responsible for falling in line with their ESG standards.  Billionaire critics of Fink’s ESG initiatives, Peter Thiel and Elon Musk, have publicly pushed back on BlackRock’s attempts to fundamentally change the economy based on ‘woke’ ideology.  Elon Musk recently remarked on Twitter, “Exxon is rated top ten best in the world for environment, social & governance (ESG) by S&P 500, while Tesla didn’t make the list!  ESG is a scam.  It has been weaponized by phony social justice warriors.”  Republican lawmakers have introduced legislation, known as the INDEX Act, designed to limit the power of mega money managers, like BlackRock, State Street and Vanguard, from using other people’s money to push a toxic mix of personal politics and climate doom hysteria.

Source: Trace Places (climatetrace.org)

A Foundation for Social & Climate Credit System

Aside from the obvious dangers of providing a framework for radically transforming an already unstable economy, a far greater threat of this Google-backed global surveillance system is the way in which it could be used against the public, as a foundation for the coming social and climate credit system.  Using a project like Climate TRACE to target individual cars, homes, or small businesses for whatever climate offenses these technocrats deem to be greatest, does not seem far off. The social credit system, already implemented in China, relies on mass surveillance of the population to punish or reward their citizens based on their behaviors.  Offenses against the authoritarian regime, through the social credit system, result in restrictions of access to traveling, working, or buying a home.  Public fears that mass surveillance tools, like Climate TRACE, would be used by governments to implement a social and climate credit system are justified.  Corporations, like Alibaba Group, operating in China are pressured, by law, to provide their data collection to the CCP.  At the WEF 2022 Annual Meeting, Alibaba Group president, J. Michael Evens, bragged about the company’s development of an “individual carbon footprint tracker,” which has the ability to track everything consumers buy, eat, as well as where and how they travel.  Of course, Evans failed to mention if this information would be shared with the Chinese government or if the information would be used as part of their social credit system.

The fairly new Climate TRACE coalition, which was launched in July of 2020, has set ambitious goals of tracking and tracing emission sources and reporting on “not just national subsector estimates, but ‘asset-level’ data: individual power plants, factories, ships, planes, farms, and so on all around the world.” Their use of the phrase “and so on,” in this statement isn’t reassuring, as it implies an intent to eventually narrow-in on tracking emissions at the individual level. Climate TRACE brags that their development of this machine-learning approach to trace emissions is “constantly evolving, improving and collecting more data,” allowing it to “get more and more detailed over time.”  It seems it’s only a matter of time before Climate TRACE moves their focus of tracking individual planes and farms to tracing the emissions of our individual cars, homes, and small businesses. When asked what Climate TRACE will do with all the data they collect, Gore joked, “Publish it. We’re not the climate cops.  We’re maybe the neighborhood watch, but our neighborhood is the whole world.”  The thought of ‘climate cops’ using this data as a framework for building a social and climate credit system is no joking matter.

While in Glasgow for the 2021 UN Climate Change Conference, known as COP26, Al Gore elaborated on the function of this Climate TRACE coalition to hold entities and individuals accountable for climate offenses, stating, “We can now accurately determine where the greenhouse gas emissions are coming from…and we’ll have the identities of the people who are responsible for each of those greenhouse gas emission streams, and if investors, or governments, or civil society activists want to hold them responsible, they will have the information upon which to base their action in holding them responsible.

Source: MSNBC November 4, 2021

Climate TRACE Funders, Members, Partners & Contributors

One glance at the funders of this project, reveals that Climate TRACE and their financial backers are unworthy of the public’s trust.  Climate TRACE funders include Google, Schmidt Futures, Al Gore, Benificus Foundation, and the partners of Generation Investment Management.  Google has a history of surveilling customers, tracking location data, and misleading users about their privacy protections since 2014, and attorneys general in multiple states have filed lawsuits against the Big Tech giant.  Former Google CEO and founder of Schmidt Futures, Eric Schmidt, has been accused recently of providing financial incentives to staffers of Biden’s Office of Science and Technology policy, to shape policy that, “benefited…himself.”  Schmidt has also been described as reinventing “himself as the prime liaison between Silicon Valley and the military-industrial complex,” due to conflicts of interest for intermingling work with Google and the Pentagon.  Benificus Foundation is the family foundation of John and Ann Doerr. John Doerr is a member of Breakthrough Energy Coalition, a fund backed by some of the biggest technocrats in the world, including Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, Richard Branson, and George Soros, dumping millions into the junk science climate hoax.   Generation Investment Management is a “climate-focused hedge fund” founded by Al Gore and David Blood, former CEO of Goldman Sachs Asset Management. Their holdings include investments in Google, Amazon, Microsoft and Alibaba Group. David Blood and Larry Fink are both part of the Principals Group of Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ), leading the financial industry to fundamentally transform the global economy through ESG initiatives, by uniting “net-zero financial sector-specific alliances from across the globe into one industry-wide strategic alliance.”

Members, partners and contributors to the Climate TRACE coalition include Blue Sky Analytics, Earthrise, Hypervine, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Ocean Mind, Rocky Mountain Institute, Transition Zero, WattTime, and Carbon Plan. Blue Sky Analytics’ lead investor is the World Bank’s International Finance Corporation, and the World Bank wants to hold ‘climate actors’ accountable using verifiable credentials and blockchain, of course. Earthrise Alliance is the brainchild of former NASA Deputy Administrator, Lori Garver, who served as a lead space policy advisor for Obama, Hillary, and John Kerry.  Earthrise is trademarked by the Winward Fund, which is managed by the billion dollar “dark money” network, Arabella AdvisorsHypervine is a “Glasgow-based start-up” co-funded by the European Space Agency (ESA), designed to use blockchain and satellite data, and has been promoted by Cemex. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory “supports the Department of Defense (DoD) and a wide array of U.S. government agencies,” on missions “ranging from cyber operations to homeland protection and strategic security, and…national health.”  In response to Covid-19, Johns Hopkins APL has developed AI for “health surveillance data,” as well as electronic disease surveillance systems and bio-surveillance.  Johns Hopkins APL has contributed research to Climate TRACE by providing data on “road-transport emissions” using satellite imagery.  Ocean Mind uses satellites and AI to power “enforcement and compliance,” to protect the world’s oceans, and has partnered with Microsoft after receiving their “AI for Earth” grant. Rocky Mountain Institute merged with Richard Branson’s Carbon War Room and has deep connections to the U.S. Department of Energy going back to the Obama Administration.  TransitionZero is funded by Bloomberg Philanthropies, Google and Quadrature Climate Foundation, and their CEO is a member of the World Economic Forum.  The lead investor of WattTime is Google and they partner with Rocky Mountain Institute and Microsoft.  Carbon Plan receives donations from the co-founder of Google, through the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, as well as the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative. They’ve also received project-specific funding from NASA and Microsoft, as well as computer credits from Amazon and Microsoft.  The list of members, partners and contributors to the Climate TRACE coalition goes on, but as you can see, the project is supported by a who’s who of technocratic globalists with deep pockets.

Climate TRACE is merely one piece of the puzzle in their technocratic plans to implement a global surveillance and control system, as clearly outlined in Corey’s Digs’ 4-part report entitled, ‘Global Landscape on Vaccine ID Passports.’

https://www.coreysdigs.com/technology/climate-trace-a-framework-for-esg-initiatives-and-social-climate-credit-system/

19,000 Late, Invalid Ballots Were Counted in Arizona 2020 Election: Report

Arizona 2020 Election Results May Have Been Different, Election Integrity Group Says

With the 2022 midterm elections around the corner, scrutiny of the 2020 election continues to raise questions about election integrity, including a newly identified anomaly in Maricopa County, Arizona.

Arizona Law requires that, to be considered valid, ballots must be received by the county no later than 7 p.m. on Election Day.

But newly uncovered records documenting the Maricopa County 2020 general election show that while more than 20,000 ballots were transported from the U.S. Postal Service after Election Day, Maricopa County only rejected 934 late ballots in its “Early Voting Rejections Summary” document.

This means more than 19,000 late, invalid ballots should have been rejected. That is significant because it is enough to potentially sway the results of Arizona’s presidential election, which rested with a final tally of Joe Biden winning the state with 10,457 more votes than Donald Trump.

It is impossible to know if the results would be different if the late ballots had not been counted in Maricopa County.

The Early Voting Rejections Summary is just one of the documents telling the story. County documents were obtained by Verity Vote, a group of citizen volunteers with data research and investigation backgrounds who have been investigating the 2020 election results throughout the country.

Verity Vote recently released a report detailing this investigation.

How Ballots Move

To understand the anomaly, it is important to know how ballots are moved in Maricopa County, which uses dropboxes and early mail-in voting.

A truck driven by a Maricopa County Elections Department employee picks up ballots at least once a day.

The collection truck starts at the Maricopa County Tabulation and Election Center. The truck has some space for more ballots but is already loaded with some early in-person ballots and ballots that were placed in a dropbox.

The driver goes to the post office and picks up more ballots, then takes the truck to Runbeck Election Services where all ballots are given an incoming scan.

It is here, at the scan, that the “Inbound Receipt of Delivery” document is generated. This receipt of delivery shows the date, time, and names of the employees delivering and receiving the ballots, and it itemizes the number of ballots that came from the post office, dropboxes, and early in-person voting.

In response to some document requests, Maricopa County made the Receipt of Delivery documents available for public inspection for dates spanning Oct. 13 to Nov. 6, 2020.

From that collection of documents, Verity Vote noticed that documents from Nov. 4, 2020—the day after the election—were missing. Verity Vote requested Maricopa County provide the Receipt of Delivery for that day, first with a few phone calls, then with written requests. It should have been a simple request because all the other dates were already public. But this request went to a county attorney.

“After numerous delays, multiple follow up emails, and phone calls, county employees informed Verity Vote that the records were with legal counsel pending review,” the report says. “It took nearly seven months to get the documents.”

The Nov. 4 Receipt of Delivery shows 18,000 ballots were picked up from the Post Office the day after the Nov. 3 election.

The form has three colors of ink. A Runbeck Election Services employee printed his first name only, Brandon, in blue. The ballots arrived at “9:30” on “11-4-20” and the paper is signed in the same blue ink by the receiver, but the signature is illegible.

A row listed as “lates” should show how many ballots are late. The four columns in the late row have numbers in blue ink but are scribbled over and cannot be read.

Another signature, scrawled in red ink, is also illegible. It denotes the person who delivered the ballots.

Even though the document is dated Nov. 4, one day after the election, at the top of the page, above the margin, someone has written “Election Day” in black ink in what looks like different handwriting from the rest of the page.

The county also documents receiving 1,000 ballots on Nov. 5 and 1,500 ballots on Nov. 6. Combined with the 18,000 ballots found on Nov. 4, the total documented late ballots were 20,500.

A letter from County Recorder Stephen Richer, responding to Verity Vote’s document request, indicated that the Nov. 4 receipt the county provided is not the only receipt for ballots the county received that day.

“This document does not represent the complete universe of Maricopa County inbound receipt delivery forms from Nov. 4, 2020. We cannot be certain, but we believe that the remainder of these forms were transferred to the treasurer’s office to be stored and sealed with ballots,” Richer wrote. If so, it indicates there are more mailed ballots that were not counted in the Early Voting Rejections Summary, and presumably would have been counted in the results.”

Another anomaly is the number of ballots collected Nov. 4, compared to other surrounding days.

Voters were instructed to mail ballots by Oct. 27 to be sure their ballots arrived on time. By Oct. 30, the number of ballots coming by mail dropped sharply, but then spiked the day after the election.

On Oct. 28, the county received 58,500 ballots from the post office, then:

  • Oct. 29: 14,500

  • Oct. 30: 10,500

  • Oct. 31: 6,000

  • Nov. 1: 1,500

  • Nov. 2: 1,000

  • Nov. 3: 2,500—Election Day. In order to be counted and valid, the ballot must be received by the county no later than 7 p.m.

  • Nov. 4: 18,000 late, invalid ballots

  • Nov. 5: 1,000 late, invalid ballots

  • Nov. 6: 1,500 late, invalid ballots

Yet Maricopa County rejected just 934 ballots for lateness.

Maricopa County responded to The Epoch Times’ request for comment with an email promising the communications director in its Elections Department would “reach out.” The Epoch Times will report when they do.

Arizona has 11 electoral votes. In the final tally, Biden had 74 more electoral votes than Trump, according to the official record at the National Archives.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/arizona-2020-election-results-may-have-been-different-if-20000-invalid-ballots-had-not-been-counted-report_4502315.html?est=6%2FqO1NtgS%2FjoVDq3mZf0PRmCPiEr%2FlWDGapcxWJnd81QLmFPZk6csYR%2FebGsrLXY6A%3D%3D

Letter to the Editor: Chemtrails over Oxford, Leicestershire and Yet More Spreading Towards an English Conservation Area

A reader has written that on the same day as chemtrails were seen over Shropshire and Worcestershire, 18 May, his daughter witnessed chemtrails in the sky over Oxford.

Another reader writes that on 30 April, the skies over the rural English county of Shropshire were littered with white trails.  “On this particular morning, I was struck by the number of trails such that I went inside for the camera,” he said.

And a third The Exposé reader from Leicestershire writes to tell us: “This is something I’ve been aware of and looking into for a few years now.”

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

EMAIL ADDRESS

SUBSCRIBE


Follow The Exposé’s official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here

To The Exposé,

More Chemtrails on 18 May 2022

My daughter, who lives in Oxford, sent me chemtrail pics which were taken on the same day as those you highlight in the letter you published – May 18th, I believe. We had previously exchanged similar pictures a few times over the course of this year.

It all started when I noticed what looked like crisscrossing chemtrails in the sky, several months earlier, over my house in Widnes, Cheshire – I suspected them to be chemtrails because they looked exactly like the ones I had seen in US internet videos in the past. I took pictures of them using my phone and sent them to my daughter in Oxford. She went outside her own house, saw exactly the same thing, and sent back her own pictures to me within minutes. Her own sky was worse than mine!

So, these chemtrails were being spread 250 miles apart, at exactly the same time, and on the same day. Like myself, she had never noticed this phenomenon in the sky previously until I pointed it out. Our pictures were always taken pretty early in the morning, so I suspect the spraying takes place before dawn when no one can witness it happening.

I hope you find this of interest. If you need further information, I will try to supply it.

Have a great day and good luck with The Exposé!

Yours sincerely,

250 Miles Apart, Cheshire, England

To The Exposé,

Regarding the report on chemtrails over Shropshire

On the morning of the 30th of April 2022, a clear blue sky was crisscrossed with trails that are not a regular part of this area. Ordinarily, we experience a few trails, true vapour trails from commercial passenger aircraft that fly high, just a sliver of a fuselage with no sound at all.

On this particular morning, I was struck by the number of trails such that I went inside for the camera, and took a couple of shots.

This looking North:

Shirlett, Broseley, Shropshire, 30 April 2022

From this view, most commercial traffic flies West to East. These are all over the place.

And this South towards Worcestershire:

Shirlett, Broseley, Shropshire, 30 April 2022

Beyond the trees on the right Brown Clee Hill* is on the horizon. There’s also some smoke rising and drifting East. Nothing to do with aircraft.

Viewpoint from [Shirlett, Broseley].

Regards,

Our Beautiful Countryside, Shropshire, England

*Note from The Exposé: Brown Clee Hill is the highest hill in Shropshire and is in the Shropshire Hills Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty – an area designated for conservation due to its significant landscape value.

To The Exposé,

Chemtrails 18 May

I’ve just read the letter from a reader you published: ‘Chemtrails in Tenbury Wells and Shrewsbury Skies’.

This is something I’ve been aware of and looking into for a few years now. On awaking at about 06:15 on the 18th of May I was pleased to see the sun and clear blue skies here in south/southwest Leicestershire. However, this was short-lived as by 08:00 the skies looked like this out the front ( front, first 4 photos and a back view in the last photo).

PREVIOUS

Leicestershire, England, 18 May 2022

Click on the arrows either side of the image or swipe left/right to view next or previous image (5 images)

Leicestershire, England, 18 May 2022

Click on the arrows either side of the image or swipe left/right to view next or previous image (5 images)

NEXT

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

I’m more than happy for you to use this if you did some kind of follow up/follow on the article.*

Many people were posting similar from all over the UK on Telegram on the same day. Buggered if I can remember which channel though!

Kind Regards,

Experienced Sky-Watcher, Leicestershire, England

*Note from The Exposé: Thank you for your email.  Unfortunately, there are simply not enough hours in the day to research and write articles for every request we receive.  As you will be aware we rely on donations, we are not a commercial or corporate outlet, and we do the best we can with the limited time and resources we have available.

Although you have not requested us specifically to do so, we have taken the liberty of publishing your email to raise awareness and so others who have a particular interest in this topic can add their input in the comments section. Hopefully, “crowdsourcing” information, evidence and knowledge may go some way toward the “follow up” you would like to see in the immediate future. If you would like us to unpublish your email and images please email us and we will remove them as soon as we are able.

If you would like to publish a letter, please email it to contact@theexpose.uk addressed “Letter to the Editor.”

Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

EMAIL ADDRESS

SUBSCRIBE

We urgently need your support
to keep The Expose online.


We rely solely on your support to help
fund our investigative reports.
If you like what we do then please help us to
keep doing it by supporting us today.


It’s secure, quick, and easy…

Please choose your preferred
method to show your support

Send Bitcoin

The Expose Bitcoin Wallet Address –
3KpsgfuEX6v7w83aVN4b1dfCZTzas7Kt74

Send Monero

ICO Fines American Company for Illegally Using UK Residents’ Data for Facial Recognition and Monitoring Their Behaviour

The Green World Order: Efforts to Cease the Use of Crude Oil Could Be the Greatest Threat to Civilisation’s Eight Billion People

Study finds latest Monkeypox Outbreak is result of Biolab manipulated Virus possibly released intentionally

Monkeypox Update: There has been a significant development, says Dr. Robert Malone

Follow Daily Expose on Telegram

WE'VE BEEN CENSORED SO PLEASE SHARE THIS ARTICLE:

LIKE THIS:

RELATED

Letter to the Editor: Chemtrails in Tenbury Wells and Shrewsbury Skies

May 31, 2022

In "Breaking News"

UK Government Does Not Deny Chemtrails Exist

May 15, 2022

In "Breaking News"

What Governments Know, The Adam and Eve Story and Climate Change – We Need to Talk About the Causes of Climate Change

September 16, 2021

In "Breaking News"

 Categories: Breaking News

Tagged as: Latest News

Post navigation

ICO Fines American Company for Illegally Using UK Residents’ Data for Facial Recognition and Monitoring Their Behaviour

0

Article Rating

Subscribe 

Login

{}[+]

3 COMMENTS

Letter to the Editor: Chemtrails over Oxford, Leicestershire and Yet More Spreading Towards an English Conservation Area – altnews.org

48 minutes ago

[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]

0

Reply

Chemtrails over Oxford, Leicestershire and Yet More Spreading Towards an English Conservation Area – The Expose - Nota Akhir Zaman

8 minutes ago

[…] you would like to publish a letter, please email it to [email protected] addressed “Letter to the […]

0

Reply

Jason

16 seconds ago

You guys are just noticing these now? They’ve been spraying every day in populated areas for decades. Better late than never i guess.

0

Reply

Top Posts

Get New Posts By Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to The Exposé for regular updates...

EMAIL ADDRESS

SUBSCRIBE TO THE EXPOSÉ

Get in touch

contact@theexpose.uk

Got a story you think the public needs to hear?
Then contact us today.

Categories

Archives

ARCHIVES  Select Month   June 2022    May 2022    April 2022    March 2022    February 2022    January 2022    December 2021    November 2021    October 2021    September 2021    August 2021    July 2021    June 2021    May 2021    April 2021    March 2021    February 2021    January 2021    December 2020    November 2020  

|

URGENT: IT’S THE FINAL DAY TO SAVE THE EXPOSE AND KEEP US ONLINE - Less than 0.1% of readers currently support us even though we rely solely on your support. But if every single one of you reading this supported us today then we'd have the funds to keep going for another year and could remove this annoying banner...

Donate

https://expose-news.com/2022/06/01/chemtrails-approaching-english-conservation-area/

3

Masking: More Harms than Good? Face masks make the disease worse, and have no impact on ocular infection risk Robert W Malone MD, MS

Please forgive the brevity of today’s substack, but I suggest that the issue of mask use needs to be addressed.

The Foegen effect

A mechanism by which facemasks contribute to the COVID-19 case fatality rate

Fögen, Zacharias MD∗ The Foegen effect, Medicine: February 18, 2022 - Volume 101 - Issue 7 - p e28924 doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028924

Abstract: Extensive evidence in the literature supports the mandatory use of facemasks to reduce the infection rate of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, which causes the coronavirus disease (COVID-19). However, the effect of mask use on the disease course remains controversial. This study aimed to determine whether mandatory mask use influenced the case fatality rate in Kansas, USA between August 1st and October 15th 2020.

This study applied secondary data on case updates, mask mandates, and demographic status related to Kansas State, USA. A parallelization analysis based on county-level data was conducted on these data. Results were controlled by performing multiple sensitivity analyses and a negative control.

A parallelization analysis based on county-level data showed that in Kansas, counties with mask mandate had significantly higher case fatality rates than counties without mask mandate, with a risk ratio of 1.85 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.51–2.10) for COVID-19-related deaths. Even after adjusting for the number of “protected persons,” that is, the number of persons who were not infected in the mask-mandated group compared to the no-mask group, the risk ratio remained significantly high at 1.52 (95% CI: 1.24–1.72). By analyzing the excess mortality in Kansas, this study determines that over 95% of this effect can solely be attributed to COVID-19.

These findings suggest that mask use might pose a yet unknown threat to the user instead of protecting them, making mask mandates a debatable epidemiologic intervention.

The cause of this trend is explained herein using the “Foegen effect” theory; that is, deep re-inhalation of hypercondensed droplets or pure virions caught in facemasks as droplets can worsen prognosis and might be linked to long-term effects of COVID-19 infection. While the “Foegen effect” is proven in vivo in an animal model, further research is needed to fully understand it.

My friend Dr. Byram W. Bridle wrote a great article on a topic near and dear to my heart. I highly recommend reading his entire article. Below is an excerpt from his piece:

Stop Masking Children They Need To Interact With The Microbial World

Isolating children from the microbial world promotes the development of chronic diseases.

Young children need to interact with the microbial world. It is absolutely essential to the proper development of their immune systems. I am not going to delve into too many scientific details here because I wrote about this in an article that I published in The Conversation in March 2021. It is entitled “A year of COVID-19 lockdown is putting kids at risk of allergies, asthma and autoimmune diseases”.

In a nutshell, we are born with naïve and immature immune systems. Our immune systems don’t fully mature until well into the teenage years, with most of that development occurring between birth and about six years of age.

The ability of the immune system to self-regulate relies on interactions with the microbial world; especially via interactions with other people, particularly family members. This allows their immune system to learn to differentiate between things that are dangerous and those that are not. In turn, their immune system will become equipped to respond to dangers while preventing potentially harmful responses to things that pose no threat, such as self and inert environmental molecules and normal gut-resident bacteria, etc.

Isolating a young child from non-dangerous microbes in their environment compromises the ‘immunoregulatory’ components of their immune system. A dysregulated immune system often manifests itself in the form of allergies, asthma, and autoimmune diseases.

I felt compelled to write about this concern in May 2021 after I witnessed children being chronically isolated for more than a year. One year was the timepoint at which I felt that substantial, potentially irreparable harm could be done to children’s immune systems. I am appalled that many children have now been enduring this for well over two years, with no end in sight for some.

Masking is controversial and, arguably, largely ineffective against preventing the spread of viruses in ways other than via coughing and sneezing. However, they can pose a reasonable barrier to larger environmental particles (e.g., dust particles, dander, pollen, etc.) and bacteria. Throw in the excessive use of things like antibacterial hand sanitizers, being locked down in homes and lack of physical interactions, and we are now well on our way to having a micro-generation of children who will have been isolated like no other human beings in history. Unfortunately, these children will now be part of an unanticipated experiment on a global scale; one to really assess the validity of the so-called ‘hygiene hypothesis’. Although I would like to be wrong on this one, basic immunological principles suggest that very young children that had to endure COVID-19 lockdown policies might be faced with the highest rates of autoimmune diseases, allergies, and asthma in human history.

Dr. Bridle ends his article with the following statement:

Moving Forward

The moral of this story is to stop isolating our children from their microbial world. Let them get dirty. Let them interact with other children. Let them hug family members and friends. Consider getting a cat or dog that they can interact closely with. Take them on hikes in the woods or countryside. Definitely have them wash their hands with regular soap, but cut down on the antibacterial soaps and sanitizers. Every time normal flora on the skin are killed one risks having them re-populated with pathogens.

And, for goodness sake, let children see the mouths of others so they can learn to speak properly.

What harm is done from the last two-and-a-half years is done. But, please, let’s not keep locking down, physically distancing and masking our children ad nauseum. Not for SARS-CoV-2, not for the annual flu, not for monkeypox. Not for anything unless it is demonstrated via transparent, objective, publicly disclosed and openly debated science to be a genuine threat to the lives of a substantial proportion of children.

The Ocular Manifestations and Transmission of COVID-19: Recommendations for Prevention

See here for the full article

Background

Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), caused by a novel coronavirus termed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has been linked to ocular signs and symptoms in several case reports. Research has demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 is spread primarily through close contact via respiratory droplets, but there is the possibility for ocular transmission, with the conjunctiva as a conduit as well as a source of infection.

Discussion

Ocular manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 include follicular conjunctivitis, and have been repeatedly noted as an initial or subsequent symptom of COVID-19-positive patients. Particularly in patients with ocular manifestations, there is evidence that the virus may present in tears, based on the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in conjunctival swab samples via reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The virus may therefore be transmittable from the ocular surface to a new host via contact with the ocular mucosa, tears, or subsequent fomites.

Conclusions

All health care professionals should ask patients about ocular symptoms consistent with SARS-CoV-2, and use eye protection such as goggles or face shields as part of the standard personal protective equipment for high-risk patients in addition to wearing of masks by both the patient and provider, and should consider tears to be potentially infectious.

Thank you for reading Who is Robert Malone. This post is public so feel free to share it.

Who is Robert Malone is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Subscribe now

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/masking-more-harms-than-good?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo3MTIzNTcwMywicG9zdF9pZCI6NTc1MDkxNzksIl8iOiJRdWxZNCIsImlhdCI6MTY1NDA4OTczMSwiZXhwIjoxNjU0MDkzMzMxLCJpc3MiOiJwdWItNTgzMjAwIiwic3ViIjoicG9zdC1yZWFjdGlvbiJ9.TYIAUxAaIMITpVjYXAr5CuRobYFxgFW1xwxMdY15yBY&s=r

German Researchers’ Meta-Analyses Showcases the Potential of Vitamin D in Preventing Cancer Deaths

Researchers with the Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research at the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) recently published the results of meta-analyses focusing on Vitamin D insufficiency and food fortification. In Neidermaier et al.’s study, published in the European Journal of Epidemiology, the authors estimated the cancer mortality reduction already achieved by current fortification policies and the potential for further reductions if all countries had adequate fortification.

Niedermaier and other corresponding authors report that “Vitamin D is an essential hormone for bone metabolism and is involved in many other physiological processes.” They go on to add that “daily supplementation with vitamin D (with 400–2000 international units (IU) per day) lowers cancer mortality (but not cancer incidence) by approximately 13% in older adults.” In fact, they share, “meta-analyses of observational studies found better survival in cancer patients for a number of cancers, including colorectal, breast, prostate, and pancreatic cancer.” 

Vitamin D Insufficiency

Prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency is high in European countries, particularly in the older population and non-western immigrants, and is highest in winter and spring due to insufficient vitamin D production in the skin under sun exposure during the winter months.

Europe's Food Fortification

An alternative and comparably effective way of enhancing vitamin D status is with the fortification of foods with vitamin D. Various European countries already have policies to fortify several food groups to some extent.

Study Results

As reported by the study authors, “We estimated that approximately 27,000 cancer deaths were prevented by established fortification policies in 2017, with the potential to prevent an additional 129,000 cancer deaths by implementing vitamin D fortification to the optimal degree in all European countries. 

“In summary, our study suggests that more widespread vitamin D food fortification policies in European countries might make a major contribution to lowering the burden of cancer deaths in Europe, with the potential to prevent approximately 129,000 additional cancer deaths (more than 113,000 in the EU) and approximately 1.2 million (1 million in the EU) years of life lost per year, corresponding to approximately 9% (10% in the EU) of cancer deaths and years of life lost.”

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The PEN project is funded by the JPI HDHL, a research and innovation initiative of EU member states and associated countries. The funding agencies supporting this work are (in alphabetical order of participating countries): France: Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA); Germany: Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF); Ireland: Health Research Board (HRB); Italy: Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR); The Netherlands: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw); New Zealand: The University of Auckland, School of Population Health; Norway: The Research Council of Norway (RCN); Poland: The National Centre for Research and Development (NCBR).

About the German Cancer Research Center

DKFZ is the largest biomedical research institute in Germany and a member of the Helmholtz Association of National Research Centers. In over 90 divisions and research groups, our more than 3,000 employees, of which more than 1,200 are scientists, are investigating the mechanisms of cancer, are identifying cancer risk factors and are trying to find strategies to prevent people from getting cancer.They are developing novel approaches to make tumor diagnosis more precise and treatment of cancer patients more successful.

Study Authors

Tobias Niedermaier, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany

 

Thomas Gredner, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany 

 

Sabine Kuznia, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany

Medical Faculty Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

 

Ben Schöttker, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany

Network Aging Research (NAR), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

 

Ute Mons, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany

Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

Cancer Prevention Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany

 

Jeroen Lakerveld, Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands

 

Wolfgang Ahrens,  Department of Epidemiological Methods and Etiological Research, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany

Institute of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany

 

Hermann Brenner, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany

Network Aging Research (NAR), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany

German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany

https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/german-researchers-meta-analyses-showcases-the-potential-of-vitamin-d-in-preventing-cancer-deaths-3d939cb8

Careening Towards Grace By James Howard Kunstler

They screwed-the-pooch on the Covid-19 caper and now the data is biting Klaus and Company on the ass….

The World Economic Forum (WEF), a.k.a. the Davos Gang, held its 2022 schmoozefest in that tidy Swiss alpine village last week, after a nearly three-year hiatus on account of the coronavirus pandemic they generously arranged for the rest of us. These are the self-defined leaders of the Great Re-set — Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates, and Klaus’s scaly majordomo, Dr. Yuval Noah Harari, the inverse reincarnation of Adolf Eichmann, famous for declaring that “humans are hackable animals.” Did he mean, like, with a meat cleaver?

Who do these schnitzel-scarfing, Krug-guzzling punks think they are? Or, to paraphrase the immortal words of one Pete Hogwallop, who elected them boss of this outfit?

Nobody, that’s who, on this whole, wide, ever-turning world, which they literally aim to take over. Actually, from the way they talk, it already looks like they’ve hijacked the sucker and us “worthless” and “useless” humans on it, as Dr. Harari has labeled the multitudes riding the planet in economy class. Kind of looks like we’re in for a rough landing.

As first hallucinated in Herr Doktor Schwab’s pulsating brain, apparently many years ago, the Great Re-set was initially scheduled for 2050, a sort of leisurely stroll-in-the-park to the shimmering gates of transhumanism. Then the gang got nervous and pushed it up to 2030 (climate change, and all). When that retrograde monster of US politics, Donald Trump, came on the scene, they panicked and re-set their Re-set for 2023. Now, despite the surface decorum of this year’s Davos meet-up, it looks like they are — as we say here in the old New World — losing their shit.

How come? Well, for one thing, we appear to be in a close race between Klaus’s controlled demolition of the global economy and the US midterm elections this November, and perhaps the gang perceives that won’t go so well for them. Their key project in the 2022 offensive, the War in Ukraine, isn’t working out, either. The idea, it seems, was to bog down and humiliate the Russians so as to bring on the defenestration of Mr. Putin, who, believe it or not and despite the tsunamis of aspersion loosed on him by WEF-funded propagandists, is strangely and actually a defender of Western Civ. Yeah, I know, a stunner, right? (God works in mysterious ways — but the Davos Gangsters don’t believe in him / her / they.)

In their cuckoo clock universe, they are too busy counting the teeth on the gears inside because they are the “experts” and that’s what they do. Which brings us to one of the central fallacies of the mechanistic world-view: that if you measure enough things, you will be able to control them. Their beloved data is betraying them as it leaks out of the Pfizer vaults. They screwed-the-pooch on the Covid-19 caper and now the data is biting Klaus and Company on the ass. Especially Oberstleutnant Bill Gates’s ass, who was supposed to be in charge of the vaccine op and is jetting around the world now talking out of said cloacal aperture so recklessly that folks are looking to the lampposts of every country he lands in.

Hence, the desperate attempts at censorship by WEF stooges-in-place all around the world. And see how well that has gone, especially in the USA under WEF-installed “Joe Biden,” the cigar-store-Indian in executive drag, who fronts for a US wrecking-crew cabinet of oafs, losers, and reprobates. Has the world ever seen a more laughable official exercise than the botched appointment of one Nina Jankowicz, the Singing Censor, to the idiotically-conceived Disinformation Governance Board? They might as well have taken out a Jumbotron billboard ad in Times Square screaming Your GovernmentWe Suck in flashing psychedelic pixels.

And yet, that demolition of the global economy proceeds a’pace as, with all demolitions, once things start crashing, nothing will stop it. Supply chains for everything are breaking, with sneaky ramifications. For instance, the ammonia-based chemical additive for diesel fuel used to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions from trucks is getting scarce. New EPA rules require computerized sensors in truck engines that register nitrous oxide levels. If they are too high, the sensors automatically cut the engine. Result: trucks stop running. Further result: nothing gets delivered. Furthest result: you starve.

The WEF worked on its starvation program from other angles, too. The Ukraine-Russian war was engineered to reduce the global wheat supply by a hefty cut, say around 30 percent, as well as to curtail fertilizer exports from the world’s main producers of them: Russia, Ukraine, Belarus. No khobz f’tir for you, peoples of North Africa! (And no Hostess Ding Dongs for you, peoples of Calumet Heights, Illinois!).

Meanwhile, recall the parting admonition of the late eminent virologist Luc Montagnier, discoverer of HIV, the virus behind AIDS, who, just prior to his death predicted that 100-percent of the people injected with mRNA Covid “vaccines” would be dead in two years. Yes, yes, pretty stark stuff, I know. But that was his professional opinion, and he was at the top of his profession. Forgive me for mentioning it, but there it is, like the proverbial turd in the punchbowl.

We’re in for all kinds of interesting surprises — those of us who survive this clusterfuck — but the biggest one of all will be the WEF’s Great Re-set falling on its aforesaid ass as, when the dust settles, their grandiose, totalitarian, and ultimately wicked model of the human project yields to the astounding re-enchantment of a world pregnant with meaning, purpose, and grace. I’m not kidding around. God may be a prankster, as I’ve suggested many times, but he’s also still God, and he doesn’t appreciate wannabe faux-messianic technocrat pricks like Klaus Schwab messing with his glorious creation.

Reprinted with permission from Kunstler.com.

The Best of James Howard Kunstler

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/05/james-howard-kunstler/careening-towards-grace/

Study finds latest Monkeypox Outbreak is result of Biolab manipulated Virus possibly released intentionally

A new study published by Portugal’s National Institute of Health has uncovered evidence that the virus responsible for the Monkeypox outbreak allegedly sweeping across Europe, America and Australia, has been heavily manipulated in a lab by scientists, and further evidence suggests it has been released intentionally.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

EMAIL ADDRESS

SUBSCRIBE


Follow The Exposé’s official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here

Monkeypox illness usually begins with a fever before a rash develops one to five days later, often beginning on the face then spreading to other parts of the body. The rash changes and goes through different stages before finally forming a scab which later falls off. An individual is contagious until all the scabs have fallen off and there is intact skin underneath.

The disease has always ben extremely rare and was first identified in humans in 1970 in the Democratic Republic of the Congo in a 9-year-old boy. Since then, human cases of monkeypox have been reported in 11 African countries. It wasn’t until 2003 that the first monkeypox outbreak outside of Africa was recorded, and this was in the United States, and it has never been recorded in multiple countries at the same time.

Until now.

Suddenly, we are being told that cases of monkeypox are now being recorded in the USA, Canada, the UK, Australia, Sweden, the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Spain, Italy and Germany, all at the same time.

Source

According to the UK Health Security Agency, 172 cases of monkeypox have been identified in England as of the week ending 29th May 2022, and they have now released new guidance advising anyone with the virus to abstain from sex whilst they have symptoms, and to use a condom for at least eight weeks once the infection has cleared.

But there’s something extremely strange about this outbreak, as if the fact we’re allegedly witnessing an outbreak across first-world countries all at the same time for the first time in history wasn’t strange enough.

We don’t believe in coincidences, but there are many people that do. But we imagine those will do will struggle to comprehend this one.

Back in March 2021, the Nuclear Threat Initative (NTI) partnered with the Munich Security Conference to conduct a tabletop exercise on reducing high-consequence biological threats.

The exercise examined gaps in national and international biosecurity and pandemic preparedness architectures—exploring opportunities to improve prevention and response capabilities for high-consequence biological events.

Here’s the scenario that they conducted:

Source – Page 10

A monkeypox outbreak that began on May 15th 2022, resulting in 3.2 billion cases and 271 million deaths by December 1st 2023.

Are we really to believe it’s just a coincidence that we’re now witnessing an actual monkeypox outbreak, with the first cases being reported to the World Health Organisation on May 13th 2022?

Source

The Munich Security Conference exercise revealed that the engineered monkeypox virus was developed illicitly at the fictional country of Anica’s leading institute of virology by lab scientists working alongside an Arnican terrorist group. This terrorist group then released the “highly contagious and deadly” pathogen at a crowded train station in neighbouring fictional country Brinia.

Now, a new scientific study published by Portugal’s National Institute of Health (NIH) suggests the real-world monkeypox outbreak may be the result of something eerily similar.

The study was published May 23rd 2022 and can be accessed in full here.

Source

Scientists from the NIH collected clinical specimens from 9 monkeypox patients between May 15th and May 17th 2022 and analysed them.

The scientists concluded that the multi-country outbreak of monkeypox that we’re now allegedly witnessing is most likely the result of a single origin because all sequences viruses released so far tightly cluster together.

Figure 1: Draft phylogenetic analysis of Monkeypox viral sequences, highlighting the diversity within the outbreak cluster.

They also concluded that the virus belongs to the West African clade of monkeypox viruses. However, they found it it is most closely related to monkeypox viruses that were exported from Nigeria to several countries in 2018 and 2019, namely the UK, Israel and Singapore. This is our first clue that this latest outbreak may be the result of an engineered virus leaking from a lab.

The next piece of evidence that this virus has leaked from a lab comes with the finding that whilst the virus closely resembles those exported from Nigeria in 18/19, it is still different with over 50 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which are genetic variations. The scientists state this is far more than one would expect. This strongly indicates that somebody, somewhere has been playing with this virus in a lab.

The final findings of the study are written in a way that is hard to get your head around, as follows:

But thankfully someone who has managed to get their head around the above is none other than Dr Robert Malone, and he has provided an easy to understand breakdown of what the Scientists are attempting to declare above:

“The authors speculate that the pattern of mutations is consistent with the effects of a natural cellular protein with the abbreviated name: APOBEC3. For those who want to dive into the molecular virology of APOBEC3, here is a nice 2015 J Immunology review

For those seeking the “Cliff Notes” abridged version,see WikipediaFor the obsessives or aficionados, note that APOBEC3 is associated with a specific pattern of base changes- (C→U). On the basis of their hypothesis regarding the potential role for APOBEC3, I infer that the authors must have detected a statistically significant fraction of C→U changes in the current isolates relative to the 2018-2019 isolates.#

Here is the rub. While APOBEC3 is associated with cellular resistance (yet another form of “innate immunity”) to HIV (and presumably other retroviruses), a quick PubMed search reveals that Poxviruses are resistant to the mutational effects of APOBEC3! 

For example, see this 2006 paper published in “Virology”Frankly, whether through lack of curiosity or fear of attack from government-controlled media and journals, the failure of the authors to even mention this Virology article is a major oversight at best.

My inference and interpretation?

On the basis of this sequence analysis report from the INSA team cited above, to me, this is looking more like a laboratory manipulated strain than a naturally evolved strain. Bad news.

Furthermore, this double-stranded DNA virus, infections by which have historically been self-limiting, appears to be evolving (during the last few days!) to a form that is more readily transmitted from human to human

Bad news.”

This newly published scientific study has essentially uncovered a mass of evidence pointing to the latest monkeypox outbreak being the result of a heavily manipulated virus that has leaked from a lab.

Couple this with the Munich Security Conference simulation conducted in March 2021 that just so happened to revolve around a monkeypox outbreak beginning in May 2022 as the result of a bioterrorist lab leak, then it’s not hard to conclude that we’re either witnessing a real-life monkeypox outbreak that has been purposely released from a lab, or one hell of a coincidence. And we don’t believe in the latter.

https://expose-news.com/2022/06/01/study-monkeypox-outbreak-is-intentional-lab-leak/