Mike Whitney: “I’m going to go out on a limb here and say there is zero chance that this new monkeypox occurred naturally” BY RHODA WILSON

What do you think the chances are that an oddball affliction, like monkeypox, could spontaneously break out in 10 different locations around the world – where it had never appeared before – at the exact same time?

How about “zero” chance? Is that too high?

What if monkeypox is not, in fact, a naturally occurring virus but merely the next phase of a relentless war on individual freedom and the basic institutions of modern civilization?

The Exposé reports the facts the mainstream refuse to. Let’s not lose touch, subscribe today to receive the latest news from The Exposé in your inbox…

EMAIL ADDRESS

SUBSCRIBE

Follow The Exposé on Telegram
Join The Exposé’s Telegram Discussion Group

By Mike Whitney

Bill Gates’ prediction that the world would face an unexpected smallpox outbreak is miraculously unfolding. Should we be surprised?

I know I’m not. Here’s the money quote that was delivered by Gates 6 months before the first case was recorded.

“It’ll take probably about a billion a year for a pandemic Task Force at the WHO level, which is doing the surveillance and actually doing what I call ‘germ games’ where you practice… You say, OK, what if a bioterrorist brought smallpox to 10 airports? You know, how would the world respond to that?” 

Bill Gates, Sky News, 6 November 2021

One can only marvel at Gates’ extraordinary powers of perception. He’s like some kind of Software Soothsayer able to divine the future from the entrails of animals. Is that it, or does he have a crystal ball tucked away somewhere in the bowels of his Lake Washington mansion? Whatever it is, it’s truly astonishing. Here’s more from the World Socialist Web Site:

An unprecedented outbreak of monkeypox virus has officially spread to 10 countries outside of Africa, with 107 confirmed or suspected cases reported as of this writing, in the United Kingdom (9 cases), Portugal (34), Spain (32), France (1), Belgium (2), Sweden (1), Italy (3), Canada (22), the United States (2), and Australia (1).

Much remains unknown about what is causing the outbreak, which is the most geographically dispersed and rapidly spreading monkeypox outbreak since the virus was first discovered in 1958. In the coming days and weeks, more data and scientific understanding will emerge, but already there is profound concern within the scientific community and among the public, which has found wide expression on social media.

Over 100 monkeypox infections detected in 10 countries as unprecedented outbreak spreads globally, World Socialist Web Site, 19 May 2022

Repeat: The most “rapidly spreading monkeypox outbreak since the virus was first discovered in 1958.”

I wonder if that “rapidly spreading” part has something to do with the way that researchers have been tweaking the gain-of-function of these unique pathogens in order to make them more contagious and more lethal? Is that what’s going on?

We’ll probably never know.

And, is it fair to ask whether monkey-pox might be another lab-generated virus that was concocted in the 300-or-so Pentagon-funded secret labs sprinkled around the world that are presently conducting a massive war on humanity to further the ambitions of billionaire elites who are committed to reducing the global population while imposing strict, police state surveillance on every sentient being on planet earth?

We probably won’t get an answer to that one either.

In the interest of fairness, though, we should mention that “reputable” media outlets, like Newsweek magazine, have refuted the claim that Gates made the prediction that we allude to above. Here’s Newsweek’s explanation:

“While Gates has talked about the possibility of bioterrorist smallpox attacks in the past, his comments have been drawn slightly out of context and don’t mention monkeypox.” 

Fact Check: Did Bill Gates Predict the Monkeypox Outbreak? Newsweek, 19 May 2022

“Slightly out of context?” You mean, Gates did NOT draw attention to a particular infectious disease (smallpox) that magically re-emerged from extinction just months later? What “context” is the author talking about? We’d like to know.

Strictly speaking, it doesn’t matter what Newsweek says or doesn’t say, after all, Gates has become the embodiment of everything that’s wrong with today’s Public Health Gestapo, which is why he’s become a magnet for criticism. And, whether he’s been treated fairly or not, a sizable number of people believe quite strongly, that Gates is the mastermind behind a plan to use lab-generated infectious diseases to subjugate the global population in order to establish a tyrannical New Order controlled by voracious elites like himself. And the WHO’s new sovereignty-eviscerating treaty further underscores this point, in fact, it seems to suggest that Gates and his fellow travellers believe their lifelong ambition to rule the world is now within their grasp. Check it out:

In researching this article, I stumbled across a number of tidbits that readers might find interesting. For example, I discovered that there had been a tabletop exercise simulating a global pandemic involving an unusual strain of #monkeypox” that took place in March 2021. It’s astonishing how many of these ‘preparatory drills’ seem to take place just prior to some particularly horrific event. Can we dismiss them all as mere coincidences? Check out this blurb from the Brownstone Institute:

… media outlets around the world are on red alert over the world’s first-ever global outbreak of monkeypox in mid-May 2022—just one year after an international biosecurity conference in Munich held a simulation of a “global pandemic involving an unusual strain of monkeypox” beginning in mid-May 2022.

Monkeypox was first identified in 1958, but there’s never been a global monkeypox outbreak outside of Africa until now—in the exact week of the exact month predicted by the biosecurity folks in their pandemic simulation. Take these guys to Vegas!

The global monkeypox outbreak—occurring on the exact timeline predicted by a biosecurity simulation of a global monkeypox outbreak a year prior—bears a striking resemblance to the outbreak of Covid-19 just months after Event 201, a simulation of a coronavirus pandemic almost exactly like Covid-19.  

Monkeypox Was a Table-Top Simulation Only Last Year”, Brownstone Institute

And here’s a minute and a half video that helps to explain the excerpt above. (Video) You may notice that the anchor reporting the (simulated) outbreak says, “Scientists have decided that this monkeypox virus was engineered.”

In March 2021, NTI partnered with the Munich Security Conference to conduct a tabletop exercise simulating a global pandemic involving an unusual strain of monkeypox caused by a terrorist attack using a pathogen engineered in a laboratory. – Disclose.tv

Uh huh. And, further along, one of the analysts offers these prescient words of advice: “We’re seeing far fewer cases where governments’ took early and decisive action”

What do you think that means? Could it mean that we’d better prepare ourselves for another round of experimental clot shots? Is that what it means?

So, here’s your Pandemic Quiz for the Day: What do you think the chances are that an oddball affliction, like Monkeypox, could spontaneously break out in 10 different locations around the world (where it had never appeared before) at the exact same time?

How about “zero” chance? Is that too high?

I’m going to go out-on-a-limb here and say there is zero chance that this new disease occurred “naturally”. The only rational assumption one can make, is that monkeypox, like Covid, is a lab-generated pathogen spread by covert agents that are prosecuting a bio-war on the global population.

The above is extracted from Mike Whitney’s full article Monkeypox: “Fool Me Twice, Shame on Me“, read the full article on Global Research HERE.

About the Author

Michael Whitney is a renowned geopolitical and social analyst based in Washington State. He initiated his career as an independent citizen-journalist in 2002 with a commitment to honest journalism, social justice and World peace.

He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG).

You can find more articles by Mike Whitney on The Unz Review.

Covid Lies: Instigating Fear and Dominating the Narrative BY RHODA WILSON

The purpose of this document is to demonstrate that all of the key narrative points about the SARS-CoV-2 virus said to cause the disease Covid-19 and the measures imposed to control it are incorrect.

Given that the sources of these points are scientists, doctors, and public health officials, it is evident that they were not simply mistaken. Instead, they have lied in order to mislead. I believe the motivations of those who I call “the perpetrators” become clear, once it is internalised that the entire event is based on lies.

In recent days, breaking news indicates that coronavirus antibodies are present in blood stored in European blood banks from 2019.1 The implications are momentous.

The Exposé reports the facts the mainstream refuse to. Let’s not lose touch, subscribe today to receive the latest news from The Exposé in your inbox…

EMAIL ADDRESS

SUBSCRIBE

Follow The Exposé on Telegram
Join The Exposé’s Telegram Discussion Group

By Dr. Mike Yeadon, 10 April 2022

Unprecedented Pronouncements

In the first three months of the Covid event, I started noticing senior scientific and medical advisors on UK television saying things that I found disturbing. It was hard to put my finger on the specifics, but they included remarks like:

  • “Because this is a new virus, there won’t be any immunity in the population”.

  • “Everyone is vulnerable”.

  • “In view of the very high lethality of the virus, we are exploring how best to protect the population”.

I had been reading extensively about the apparent spread of SARS-CoV-2 in China and beyond and had already arrived at a number of important conclusions. Essentially, I was sure that, objectively, we weren’t going to experience a major event. I based some of my conclusions on the Diamond Princess cruise ship experience. Note that no crew members died, and only a minority on the ship even got infected, suggesting substantial prior immunity, a steep age-lethality relationship, and an infection fatality ratio (IFR) not much different, if at all, from prior respiratory virus infections. But what was happening was that, in my view, senior people were acting a lot more frightened than seemed appropriate.

It was with this heightened interest that I began to closely examine all aspects of the alleged pandemic. I suspected something very bad was happening when Imperial College released its modelling paper by Neil Ferguson. This claimed that over 500,000 people in the UK would die unless severe “measures” were put in place. Ferguson had over-projected all of the last five disease-related emergencies in the UK and had been responsible for the destruction of the beef herd through his modelling of the spread of foot-and-mouth disease.

I had also been reading about all sorts of “non-pharmaceutical interventions” (NPIs), and what this had taught me was that there was absolutely no experimental literature around any of the NPIs being spoken of, except masks—which were clearly ineffective in blocking respiratory virus transmission. Moreover, the non-experts in the mainstream media drew on a very limited group of experts, and I noticed that none were immunologists.

I had, in parallel, watched the evolving scene in Sweden and was pleased to note that the Swedes’ chief epidemiologist, Anders Tegnell, seemed to know what he was doing and had dismissed the panic. I knew he had been the deputy of his predecessor, Johan Gieseke, who was still around in an emeritus role. Gieseke was also reassuringly calm. The final straw was when on March 23, 2020, the British prime minister initiated the first “lockdown”. This was wholly without precedent. I knew Sweden had rejected lockdown measures as wholly unnecessary and extremely damaging.

Instigating Fear

From that day forward, the team from the UK Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) put up one or more members every day to appear alongside the prime minister or the health minister. These press conferences were meandering affairs, and it wasn’t clear what their purpose was. The questions asked never sought to place things in context, but instead seemed to always explore the outer edges of possible outcomes and then follow up with remarks that didn’t seem adequately prepared.

In retrospect, I think the aim was to make the press conferences the only “must watch” thing on TV, and with such a large, captive audience, a form of fear-based hypnosis was instigated. Much later, Belgian professor and clinical psychologist Mattias Desmet informed us that this was indeed the aim, calling the process “mass formation”.2 This process can become malignant, as have past beliefs in events that were later conceded to have been episodes of societal madness, like the Salem witch trials, satanic abuse of children, and other delusions.

Some experts believe that modern societies are more—and not less—susceptible to mass panics because of the ubiquity of easily-controlled messaging (properly termed “propaganda,” since it was completely deliberate and carefully planned). An August 2021 animated video titled “Mass Psychosis – How an Entire Population Becomes Mentally Ill” illustrates this phenomenon; despite the animation format, the film leans heavily on academic research from luminaries such as Gustave Le Bon, Sigmund Freud, Edward Bernays, Stanley Milgram, and Solomon Asch, as well as later researchers and studies.3

It is important to be cautious about the purported importance of “mass formation,” however. In a sense, it might be seen as wholly impersonal and something that is thrown at the population and lands more or less effectively on people at random. Worse, it comes with the notion that, if you are susceptible, it cannot be resisted. There is a contrasting school of thought that holds that information technology (IT), data, and artificial intelligence (AI) are capable of assembling a “digital prison” that is tailored to each individual and shaped over time by choices that we each make.4 The outcome isn’t in any way preordained. However, incentives and deterrents are associated with innumerable decisions we make, such as how to pay for something, whether we sell our data for tiny rewards, whether we consciously decide to open links suggested for us, whether we leave location services running permanently, and more.5

Using Mass Testing to Promote Fear

As soon as the UK lockdown was initiated, the focus turned full force onto mass testing, and especially on testing people without symptoms. I knew this didn’t make any sense, because if a large enough number of people are tested daily, without knowledge of the false-positive rate, it could certainly very quickly panic people into thinking there were lots of people walking around with the virus, unaware they had it and allegedly spreading it to others.

Once the lockdown was in place, in addition to testing, the press conferences focused on numbers in hospital, numbers on ventilators, and ultimately, the daily deaths “with Covid”. Early treatments and improved lifestyles were never spoken of. The first lockdown lasted 12 weeks, with most office staff told to work from home while being paid “furlough” (a word never before used in Britain). The “fear porn” continued all the way into high summer, long after daily Covid deaths had reached approximately zero. The introduction of mandatory masking in all public areas in the heat of summer, when they had never been required before, was the last straw for me. It was all theatre.

At that point, I set out to investigate a couple of core concepts: the “PCR test” and “asymptomatic transmission”. I’m embarrassed to say, however, that it wasn’t until the autumn of 2020 that I had clear in my mind, with mounting horror, that the entire event, if not completely manufactured, was being grossly exaggerated, with the intent of deceiving the entire “liberal democratic West”. Scores of countries were economically being squeezed to death. I knew that from a financial perspective, borrowing or printing enough money to subsidize tens of millions to remain at home could not be long sustained without destroying the sovereign currency. Strangely, exchange rates didn’t move much—another clue that powerful forces were managing this event as well as its consequences. Around this time, country leaders started talking about “Build Back Better,” and Klaus Schwab’s book, COVID-19: The Great Reset, appeared.

All of this contributed to my developing the idea of “The Covid lies”. It seemed to me that everything we had been told about the virus wasn’t true, and also that all the NPIs imposed upon us couldn’t work, and so were for nothing more than show.

One Dominant Narrative

As already mentioned, repetition and fear were key to instigating “mass formation” as described by Mattias Desmet.2 This narrowing of focus, according to Desmet, means those “in the mass” (crowd) literally are incapable of hearing anything that challenges the narrative of which they’ve been convinced. Any explanation other than the truth is marshalled to dismiss rational counter-arguments. And indeed, we saw that anyone challenging the dominant narrative was attacked, smeared, censored, and cancelled on social media, and no reasonable and independent voices were ever seen or heard on TV or radio.

Desmet argues that mass formation, to be successful, requires that certain conditions be in place: high levels of free-floating anxiety; a strong degree of social isolation (where devices replace real human interactions); and finally, low levels of “sense-making,” that is, many things do not make sense to many people. When a crisis is dropped into a population where these conditions obtain and is repeated ad nauseam, it is possible in effect to hypnotise them.

When the narrative has taken hold, what happens next?

  • Now, the population’s anxiety has an obvious focus, which is felt as a relief.

  • The routines—masking, lockdowns, testing, hand sanitizing—become for some a ritual, which provides daily meaning.

  • Finally, so many people are acting the same way and echoing the same lines (the lines they’ve heard time and again on TV, radio, newspapers, and their devices), that people can feel part of a national effort in a way they’ve not felt before.

  • This combination, coupled with visible and strong punishment for anyone who questions the narrative or simply refuses to comply, reinforces the groupthink.

It is, according to crowd psychology experts, nearly impossible to extract those who are this deeply “in the mass”. However, there is always another group of individuals who never fall for such tricks. Outwardly pleasant and easy-going, these individuals typically are sceptical and go along with things only if they make sense to them personally, and not because an authority figure tells them to.

There is also a third group in the middle—individuals who often sense that something is wrong but lack the courage of their own convictions and tend to side with whatever they’re told to do, rather passively. They are not hypnotised, but to third parties, they can seem to be.

Crowd psychology experts encourage those who’ve seen through the lies (the second group) to speak out and continue to do so. This legitimises speaking out by all others not persuaded by the narrative and might even extract some from the middle group. Even those in the “mass” group will be prevented from sinking yet more deeply into the narrative, from where those orchestrating events can otherwise prompt such people to commit atrocities.

Vaccine Lies

In the second half of 2020, the conversation turned to the oncoming vaccines. Having spent 32 years in pharmaceutical research and development (R&D), I knew that what we were being told about vaccines was just lies. It’s not possible to bypass a dozen years of careful work or to compress it into a few months. The product that was to emerge was almost certain, to my mind, to be very dangerous. And after I began reading my way into this area, I grew more concerned still.

In my “Covid Lies” comments, I isolate ONLY the major narrative points themselves and show that none of them are true. In other words, this was not just a little lying here and there—no, the entire construct was false. After I describe all the main lies, I show how the perpetrators were able to get away with it. At the conclusion, I believe the reader will share my view that the whole event was manufactured or exaggerated from a mild situation.

Remember, no alternative views were permitted in the “public square”. In fact, in July 2019—well before the declared pandemic—a group of powerful media organisations had already assembled and founded the Trusted News Initiative (TNI). The purpose of TNI was both to control mass media messages and crush alternative voices from any direction.6

Again, all of the Covid narrative was lies. Not mistakes. Many of the politicians who repeated others’ lines might try to offer as defence that they relied on experts to inform them. U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) director Rochelle Walensky recently did just that when she said that the CDC made vaccination recommendations because CNN published Pfizer’s press release saying that their Covid-19 vaccine was 95% effective. (You can’t make this up.) However, the true subject matter experts who promoted the false narrative from the public health departments— such as Chief Scientific Advisor Sir Patrick Vallance in the UK and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) director Dr. Anthony Fauci in the U.S.—knew their statements were untrue.

The Question of Motive

The question of motive has to arise. What possible motive might there have been to create this state of fear? Who must have been involved to have granted authorisation to do it?

I have tried to find benign explanations and have failed to do so. The logical conclusions I’m drawn to make for very disturbing reading. I look forward to discussing them with you and indeed with anyone. Although it’s unlikely I am correct on every point, what I am sure of is that the overall picture is one of extreme deception and a highly-organised fraud. Moreover, I am not alone in reaching this view. For example, in an essay titled “if I were going to conquer you,” one author walks us through what the perpetrators would do in order to take over the world through a simultaneous “coup d’état” of the liberal democracies.7 Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. summarised a plausible explanation in a speech in Milan in November 2021.8

I appear to be the ONLY former executive-level scientist from big pharma anywhere in the world speaking out. I have invested two years pro bono in identifying the key elements of the fraud, in the sincere hope I can connect with upright individuals who can help bring this to wider attention and, ultimately, to a halt and to justice. As a result of these efforts, I can describe a global fraud operating for two years at tremendous cost in lives, the economy, and the very structure of human societies, which could only have been undertaken by powerful people, organised for a purpose that is not to the benefit of ordinary people.

References

Source

Dr. Mike Yeadon wrote a paper titled ‘The Covid Lies’ which was published on the Doctors for Covid Ethics website.  This paper is a working draft dated 10 April 2022.

At 31 pages long the paper is longer than most would read in one sitting.  As it details vital information for all of us, we are republishing his paper in more easily digestible portions in a series of articles, one each day.  This is the seventh in our series, ‘Covid Lies’, and covers the section of Dr. Yeadon’s paper titled ‘How Much of the Covid-19 Narrative Was True?’.

The Evidence is in Plain Sight – Covid Injections Are Dangerous BY RHODA WILSON

Steve Kirsch has recently sent off eight different surveys to his readers to get a sense of what the reality is out there. What he found was consistent with everything he has been saying for more than a year now, namely, the Covid “vaccines” are too unsafe to use and especially deadly for children.

“The blue pillers would argue, ‘That’s a biased survey because your readers are all anti-vaxxers with an agenda’. Oh really? Great hand-waving argument, but where is your evidence that the responses were wrong? If you are a fact-checker or work at HHS, I’m happy to give you the full data under NDA so you can actually look at the data BEFORE you make your accusations. After all, that should be the proper order, right? Evidence before accusation?” Kirsch wrote, “I am also happy to discuss the survey results on a live video call that is recorded and streamed. After all, I have nothing to hide.”

Kirsch invites any vaccine expert who believes they can successfully argue any of the points he made in his article to a recorded discussion with him “where you prove, with evidence, that [he’s] wrong.”

The Exposé reports the facts the mainstream refuse to. Let’s not lose touch, subscribe today to receive the latest news from The Exposé in your inbox…

EMAIL ADDRESS

SUBSCRIBE

Follow The Exposé on Telegram
Join The Exposé’s Telegram Discussion Group

By Steve Kirsch

Here is a summary video of the two most recent surveys I did which show the vaccines increase cancer, cause excess deaths comparable to Covid deaths, and dramatically increase miscarriage rates.

If you only watch one video this year, that is the one to watch.

Click on the image below to watch the video on Rumble.

Steve Kirsch: Two more surveys confirm that the COVID vaccines aren’t safe or effective, 23 May 2022 (17 mins)

Also recommended is another 17-minute summary video that has the highlights from 8 surveys I recently did earlier.

Click on the image below to watch the video on Rumble.

Steve Kirsch: Eight surveys all show the COVID vaccines should be immediately halted, 21 May 2022 (17 mins)

The surveys are of my readers and some people believe my readers give biased results to these questions. Of course they do. All surveys are biased. That’s why you should repeat these surveys yourself with your friends.

The point of this article is to summarise the results to date from my readers. Even with biases, it would be hard to overcome a signal this large.

For example, how do you explain an embalmer where over 90% of her cases had severe blood clots if the vaccines are perfectly safe. How do you explain that? The survey results need to be consistent with reality.

If people weren’t dying, I’d wait for the survey results on a broader audience (which we began on 23 May 2022 using a third party polling organisation). The precautionary principle of medicine compels me to publish these preliminary findings now.

The preliminary findings from these polls show:

  1. The vaccines have already killed about the same number of Americans as Covid has.

  2. For kids 5-11, the 5-11 death report data indicates we are killing 336 kids for every child we might save from COVID if the vaccine was 100% perfect in protecting against death.

  3. The second shot is the most dangerous and appears to increase all-cause mortality (ACM) over the next 30 days by approximately 8X, the first and third shots raise ACM by approximately 6X and 4.8X respectively. Even to me, this seems too high to believe, but that’s what the numbers say.

  4. It appears that the true number of Covid deaths, vaccine deaths, and annual deaths from heart attacks are relatively comparable with each other (within a factor of 2) since January 2020 to the present. This suggests that only around 700,000 people actually died from COVID and a comparable number from the Covid vaccines. This is in line with our VAERS minimum estimate of excess deaths caused by the vaccine: 12,000 VAERS excess deaths in the US * 41 (the minimum under-reporting factor) = 492,000 deaths which we knew was a minimum.

  5. For people who did not die, if you have cancer before the shot, 55% of the people had their cancer got dramatically worse after the shot. In 20% of the cases, the cancer remained the same. Nobody’s cancer got better after the shot. 0%. That is really stunning. How will the CDC explain that one? Check it out, especially the comments to the poll.

  6. Miscarriages aka spontaneous abortions increased dramatically since 2021. Over 80% of the women who miscarried were vaccinated. This should not be a surprise at all since VAERS shows the #1 elevated symptom post-vaccine is heavy menstrual bleeding which is elevated at 8,800 times normal. We’ve known that for a long time, but the CDC won’t admit it. Don’t take my word for this. Check out this Gab poll I just did.

  7. The VAERS under-reporting factor for deaths could easily be 100 or more. Of the vaccine deaths that were reported, fewer than 1% were reported to VAERS. However, not all these people were familiar with all details of the death. What we can say is that it appears that at least 0.7% of all deaths and vaccine-related miscarriages were reported to VAERS. None of the 15 deaths of kids 18 and under was reported to VAERS. In other words, the VAERS URF for deaths is highly likely less than 142.

  8. These are all estimates, but the numbers are so absurdly high that even if you factor in survey biases, nobody should be taking these vaccines, especially kids. It’s unethical.

  9. All surveys have biases and confounders. We are certainly open to hearing from anyone who thinks that they have a more accurate survey or analysis method. Instead of shooting holes in the survey, it’s more constructive to show us the “right” way or the “objective” audience for the survey. In order to attack this research, you need to attack the data or the methodology or both using data to prove we got it wrong, not hand-waving arguments.

  10. This work will never be published in a medical journal because it is counter-narrative. Starting on 23 May 2022, it will be “peer-reviewed” by hundreds of thousands of people who will be looking for an error and they will post it here. Check the comments if you want to see the “peer review.”

  11. I encourage you to replicate the surveys yourself if you don’t believe me and publish them.

We are in the process of repeating these questions with a randomly selected group of people with the survey being done by an independent polling company. We should have the results by 27 May 2022. Note that some of the survey firms want to change the questions so that they are biased in favour of making the vaccine look safe. Wow. This is why we encourage you to do it yourself.

As I mentioned earlier, the statisticians I work with tell me the signals observed here are too large to be explained by bias and they are also very consistent with previous estimates.

For example, I’ve walked into several large venues I’ve never been in before and asked the audience “how many people do you know who died from any cause right before they were going to get their first vaccine dose? How many after?” The results are always stunning. It’s the quickest way to wake up a group to be receptive to the possibility that they’ve been misled.

If you think that people are primarily honest and answer objective questions honestly, you should keep reading. Also, if you are willing to survey your own followers, keep reading as well.

Read Steve Kirsch’s survey results in his article ‘Ten different surveys all show the vaccines are not “safe and effective” — not even close’ HERE.

Covid Truths: The Deadly Lies Continue BY RHODA WILSON

We are all living through one of the most drastic changes in our culture, economic system, as well as a political system in our nation’s history as well as in the rest of the world. We have been told that we will never return to “normal” and that a great reset has been designed to create a “new world order”. This has all been outlined by Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum, in his book on the “Great Reset.”

The Exposé reports the facts the mainstream refuse to. Let’s not lose touch, subscribe today to receive the latest news from The Exposé in your inbox…

EMAIL ADDRESS

SUBSCRIBE

Follow The Exposé on Telegram
Join The Exposé’s Telegram Discussion Group

By Russell L. Blaylock, 22 April 2022

Schwab’s book gives a great deal of insight as to the thinking of the utopians who are proud to claim this pandemic “crisis” as their way to usher in a new world. This new world order has been on the drawing boards of the elite manipulators for over a century. In this paper I have concentrated on the devastating effects this has had on the medical care system in the United States, but also includes much of the Western world. In past papers, I have discussed the slow erosion of traditional medical care in the United States and how this system has become increasingly bureaucratised and regimented. This process was rapidly accelerating, but the appearance of this, in my opinion, manufactured “pandemic” has transformed our health care system overnight.

As you have seen, an unprecedented series of events have taken place within this system. Hospital administrators, for example, assumed the position of medical dictators, ordering doctors to follow protocols derived not from those having extensive experience in treating this virus, but rather from a medical bureaucracy that has never treated a single covid-19 patient. The mandated use of respirators on ICU covid-19 patients, for example, was imposed in all medical systems and dissenting physicians were rapidly removed from their positions as caregivers, despite their demonstration of markedly improved treatment methods. Further, doctors were told to use the drug remdesivir despite its proven toxicity, lack of effectiveness and high complication rate. They were told to use drugs that impaired respiration and mask every patient, despite the patient’s impaired breathing. In each case, those who refused to abuse their patients were removed from the hospital and even faced a loss of license—or worse.

For the first time in modern medical history, early medical treatment of these infected patients was ignored nationwide. Studies have shown that early medical treatment was saving 80% or higher number of these infected people when initiated by independent doctors. Early treatment could have saved over 640,000 lives over the course of this “pandemic”. Despite the demonstration of the power of these early treatments, the forces controlling medical care continued this destructive policy.

Families were not allowed to see their loved ones, forcing these very sick individuals in the hospitals to face their deaths alone. To add insult to injury, funerals were limited to a few grieving family members, who were not allowed to even sit together. All the while large stores, such as Walmart and Cosco were allowed to operate with minimal restrictions. Nursing home patients were also not allowed to have family visitations, again being forced to die a lonely death. All the while, in a number of states, the most transparent being in New York state, infected elderly were purposefully transferred from hospitals into nursing homes, resulting in very high death rates for these nursing home residents. At the beginning of this “pandemic”, over 50% of all death were occurring in nursing homes.

Throughout this “pandemic” we have been fed an unending series of lies, distortions and disinformation by the media, the public health officials, medical bureaucracies (CDC, FDA and WHO) and medical associations. Physicians, scientists, and experts in infectious treatments who formed associations designed to develop more effective and safer treatments were regularly demonised, harassed, shamed, humiliated, and experience a loss of licensure, loss of hospital privileges and, in at least one case, ordered to have a psychiatric examination.

Anthony Fauci was given essentially absolute control of all forms of medical care during this event, including insisting that drugs he profited from be used by all treating physicians. He ordered the use of masks, despite at first laughing at the use of masks to filter a virus. Governors, mayors, and many businesses followed his orders without question.

The draconian measures being used, masking, lockdowns, testing of the uninfected, use of the inaccurate PCR test, social distancing, and contact tracing had been shown previously to be of little or no use during previous pandemics, yet all attempts to reject these methods were to no avail. Some states ignored these draconian orders and had either the same or fewer cases, as well as deaths, as the states with the most strictly enforced measures. Again, no amount of evidence or obvious demonstration along these lines had any effect on ending these socially destructive measures. Even when entire countries, such as Sweden, which avoided all these measures, demonstrated equal rates of infections and hospitalisation as nations with the strictest, very draconian measures, no policy change by the controlling institutions occurred. No amount of evidence changed anything.

Experts in the psychology of destructive events, such as economic collapses, major disasters and previous pandemics demonstrated that draconian measures come with an enormous cost in the form of “deaths of despair” and a dramatic increase in serious psychological disorders. The effects of these pandemic measures on children’s neurodevelopment are catastrophic and to a large extent irreversible.

Over time tens of thousands could die as a result of this damage. Even when these predictions began to appear, the controllers of this “pandemic” continued full steam ahead. Drastic increases in suicides, a rise in obesity, a rise in drug and alcohol use, a worsening of many health measures and a terrifying rise in psychiatric disorders, especially depression and anxiety, were ignored by the officials controlling this event.

We eventually learned that many of the deaths were a result of medical neglect. Individuals with chronic medical conditions, diabetes, cancer, cardiovascular disease, and neurological diseases were no longer being followed properly in their clinics and doctor’s offices. Non-emergency surgeries were put on hold. Many of these patients chose to die at home rather than risk going to the hospitals and many considered hospitals “death houses”.

Records of deaths have shown that there was a rise in deaths among those aged 75 and older, mostly explained by covid-19 infections, but for those between the ages of 65 to 74, deaths had been increasing well before the pandemic onset. Between the ages of 18 and aged 65 years, records demonstrate a shocking hike in non-covid-19 deaths. Some of these deaths were explained by a dramatic increase in drug-related deaths, some 20,000 more than in 2019. Alcohol-related deaths also increased substantially, and homicides increased by almost 30% in the 18 to 65-year group.

The head of the insurance company OneAmerica stated that their data indicated that the death rate for individuals aged 18 to 64 had increased 40% over the pre-pandemic period. Scott Davidson, the company’s CEO, stated that this represented the highest death rate in the history of insurance records, which does extensive data collections on death rates each year. Davidson also noted that this high of a death rate increase has never been seen in the history of death data collection. Previous catastrophes of monumental extent increased death rates by no more than 10 per cent, 40% is unprecedented.

Dr. Lindsay Weaver, Indiana’s chief medical officer, stated that hospitalisations in Indiana are higher than at any point in the past five years. This is of critical importance since the vaccines were supposed to significantly reduce deaths, but the opposite has happened. Hospitals are being flooded with vaccine complications and people in critical condition from medical neglect caused by the lockdowns and other pandemic measures. A dramatic number of these people are now dying, with the spike occurring after the vaccines were introduced.

The lies flowing from those who have appointed themselves as medical dictators are endless. First, we were told that the lockdown would last only two weeks, they lasted over a year. Then we were told that masks were ineffective and did not need to be worn. Quickly that was reversed. Then we were told the cloth mask was very effective, now it’s not and everyone should be wearing an N95 mask and before that that they should double mask. We were told there was a severe shortage of respirators, then we discover they are sitting unused in warehouses and in city dumps, still in their packing crates. We were informed that the hospitals were filled mostly with the unvaccinated and later found the exact opposite was true the world over. We were told that the vaccine was 95% effective, only to learn that in fact, the vaccines cause a progressive erosion of innate immunity.

Upon release of the vaccines, women were told the vaccines were safe during all stages of pregnancy, only to find out no studies had been done on safety during pregnancy during the “safety tests” prior to the release of the vaccine. We were told that careful testing on volunteers before the EUA approval for public use demonstrated extreme safety of the vaccines, only to learn that these unfortunate subjects were not followed, medical complications caused by the vaccines were not paid for and the media covered this all up. We also learned that the pharmaceutical makers of the vaccines were told by the FDA that further animal testing was unnecessary (the general public would be the Guinea pigs.) Incredibly, we were told that Pfizer’s new mRNA vaccines had been approved by the FDA, which was a clever deception, in that another vaccine had approval (Comirnaty) and not the one being used, the BioNTech vaccine. The approved Comirnaty vaccine was not available in the United States. The national media told the public that the Pfizer vaccine had been approved and was no longer classed as experimental, a blatant lie. These deadly lies continue. It is time to stop this insanity and bring these people to justice.

Source

Russel Blaylock, a retired American neurosurgeon, wrote the above in an extensive article, ‘Covid Update: What’s the truth?’, published on 22 April in the Surgical Neurological International journal.  We are republishing sections, more easily digestible portions, of his article as a series of articles titled ‘Covid Truths’. 

This article is the seventh in our series and covers the section titled ‘Conclusions’ in Blaylocks’s article.

Although we have not included them, Blaylock’s article is well referenced. 

Read Blaylock’s full article – Blaylock RL. Covid UPDATE: What is the truth?. Surg Neurol Int 22-Apr-2022;13:167 – by following this LINK.

Mass COVID-19 vaccination is a deadly and unscientific policy that will cause surge in cancer rates, warns pathologist 05/09/2022 / By Arsenio Toledo

America’s mass Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccination programs are poor and unscientific policy decisions that will lead to surges in cancer rates among the vaccinated.

This is according to Dr. Ryan Cole, a board-certified and expert pathologist trained at the Mayo Clinic. Cole was among the first physicians in the United States to openly warn about how the COVID-19 vaccines may be associated with serious health risks, such as an elevated risk of developing cancer, which he observed in his patients. (Related: COVID-19 mass vaccination programs violate bioethics principles.)

During an interview with journalist Veronika Kyrylenko of the New American, Cole said the mRNA in COVID-19 vaccines suppresses the immune system and “all sorts of cell cycle pathways.”

Cole explained that cells have “little pattern receptors” that are responsible for communicating with the immune system. The mRNA in COVID-19 vaccines downregulates these cells – meaning the number of surface receptors they have decreases.

When more and more of a vaccinated person’s cells experience downregulation due to the mRNA in the COVID-19 vaccines, their risk of cancer spikes upward.

“A couple of these downregulated receptors are responsible for keeping cancer in check,” said Cole.

This is just one way the COVID-19 vaccines are responsible for increasing cancer rates among the fully vaccinated. Cole further explained that the spike proteins in the COVID-19 vaccines can bind to the body’s genes, including several genes that are related to cancer and tumors.

For example, when the spike proteins bind to P53 genes, a family of genes known as tumor suppressor genes, a person’s risk of developing cancerous tumors increases. When the spike proteins bind to BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, the risk of women developing breast or ovarian cancer increases.

“So, that’s just the tip of the iceberg in terms of what the spike protein can do,” warned Cole. “The other huge problem is the fact – and this was a study out of [Stanford University] … in the journal Cell – the synthetic mRNA can persist in the body, we know, for at least 60 days. That’s the point at which they stopped their study so they could publish.”

COVID-19 vaccines alter the immune system

At every opportunity that is available to him, Cole speaks out against the COVID-19 vaccines and about how they are responsible for the alarming uptick in cancers that the U.S. is currently experiencing.

“We’re seeing an alteration of the innate immune response,” said Cole. He added that scientists all over America are also witnessing this and that the uptick in these strange immune responses coincides with the rollouts of COVID-19 vaccines.

Some of the strange medical phenomena Cole has witnessed include the appearance of a childhood disease in adults and the uptick in rare cancers.

All of his observations have also been echoed by other physicians, but rigorous studies are not being conducted because of a lack of funding and because mainstream scientific institutions are unwilling to study these phenomena.

“You cannot find that for which you do not look,” he said.

Learn more about the dangers of the COVID-19 vaccines at VaccineInjuryNews.com.

FLASHBACK: Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla fantasized at World Economic Forum in 2018 about feeding people Wi-Fi microchip drugs Tuesday, May 24, 2022 by: Ethan Huff

(Natural News) A prominent globalist on the world stage, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla’s Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “vaccine” push is hardly his first medical fascism rodeo.

Back in 2018, Bourla appeared at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos where he openly fantasized about feeding people below him on the economic food chain microchip-laced pharmaceutical pills capable of communicating with the government.

Bourla explained that each tablet would contain a “biological chip” for tracking and surveillance purposes. Once consumed, dissolved and digested, the chip would tell the “authorities” that the drug was taken, ensuring compliance.

“So imagine the applications of that, the compliance,” Bourla said with a maniacal grin. “The insurance companies know that the medicines patients should take, they take them.”

You can watch Bourla giving his 2018 speech in the video below:

Bourla did not exactly receive positive feedback for these statements from anyone other than his fellow one-percenters. To this, Bourla responded that microchip-laced drugs are for the benefit of humanity, and could be used to treat “specific” conditions such as “schizophrenia and cancers.”

“‘Compliance’ he says – consumers are clearly not his customers; government bodies are,” tweeted someone in response to the video clip.

“And Pfizer is fully aligned with ‘compliance’ because it means more and more sales volume to their government customers.”

Israeli professor wants “total biometric surveillance” of the human herd in order “to monitor what’s happening under their skin”

It turns out that Bourla is hardly the only WEF globalist pushing for biometric tracking and surveillance. Yuval Noah Harari, a professor from The Hebrew University of Jerusalem‘s Department of History had this to say about the topic: “COVID is critical because this is what convinces people to accept and legitimize total biometric surveillance. We need to not just monitor people; we need to monitor what’s happening under their skin.”

A video clip of Harari can be viewed below:

In other words, the human cattle of the world need to be monitored, tracked, surveilled and controlled at all times by people like Bourla and Harari who believe that they exist above and beyond everyone else in the world who is not part of their little club.

This is their plan for the future, by the way: to control the human herd with ingestible and injectable tracking chips. It will probably start with the former and morph into the latter once the herd gets used to the idea of technocratic elitists monitoring what’s happening under their skin at all times.

Amazingly, the Hill‘s Kim Iverson, a former disbeliever in “conspiracy theories,” is now convinced that there might just be a secret cabal of evil ones who want to enslave the entire world under a bio-surveillance matrix of total slavery.

“I shall never scoff at so called conspiracy theorists again,” Iverson tweeted. “I will listen and remain open minded that perhaps what they’re saying is actually happening.”

In the comment section at Zero Hedge, many stated that they will never, ever comply with such schemes, no matter what the “authorities” demand of them.

“I wouldn’t be surprised if Pfizer first tested its tablet chip in its Ukraine biolabs on the Ukrainian people,” one of them added.

More related news stories about Albert Bourla and others like him can be found at Evil.news.

Sources for this article include:

NaturalNews.com

ZeroHedge.com

US Military Create California Earthquake Using Seismic Weapon

Evidence is emerging that the recent California earthquake and its highly irregular pattern of aftershocks was a ‘man-made event’ caused by the US military, raising the possibility they have created and are now testing a ‘seismic weapons system.’

The magnitude-5.2 earthquake rocked Southern California early on Friday June 10, rousing residents from their beds around 1:05am local time. The quake struck on the San Jacinto fault, one of the most active fault lines in an active region.

BYPASS THE CENSORS

Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox.

  • Email*

You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

Nothing unusual so far. California is riven by seismic faults and earthquakes are common.

Latest Videos

World Economic Forum to ‘ABOLISH’ Free Speech Globally

YouTube Video VVV6MkVGRnQxczFuc091bmhwRnNHQk9RLmN3OTd3dEQ5OWxn

World Economic Forum to ‘ABOLISH’ Free Speech Globally

5 hours ago

Pentagon: ‘UFO’s Are Real, You Will See More of Them’ – Stunning Admission

YouTube Video VVV6MkVGRnQxczFuc091bmhwRnNHQk9RLmlqdl91eDNCSnE0

Pentagon: ‘UFO’s Are Real, You Will See More of Them’ – Stunning Admission

May 21, 2022 9:41 am

Democrats Say Men Can Now Get Abortions Too

YouTube Video VVV6MkVGRnQxczFuc091bmhwRnNHQk9RLmRyTUdpV29pVFI4

Democrats Say Men Can Now Get Abortions Too

May 20, 2022 4:44 pm

Rothschild Slams Elon Musk For Saying He Won’t Vote Democrat Anymore

YouTube Video VVV6MkVGRnQxczFuc091bmhwRnNHQk9RLk50ZGI4RVI0VW5n

Rothschild Slams Elon Musk For Saying He Won’t Vote Democrat Anymore

May 19, 2022 6:31 pm

Freudian Slip! George W. Bush Slams the ‘Unjustified Invasion of Iraq’

YouTube Video VVV6MkVGRnQxczFuc091bmhwRnNHQk9RLkVnM214OVdVMm9n

Freudian Slip! George W. Bush Slams the ‘Unjustified Invasion of Iraq’

May 19, 2022 5:12 pm

Pedophile ‘Code Words’ Found in Hunter Biden’s Leaked Emails

YouTube Video VVV6MkVGRnQxczFuc091bmhwRnNHQk9RLnhwUDhfdzR4WF9v

Pedophile ‘Code Words’ Found in Hunter Biden’s Leaked Emails

May 18, 2022 11:22 am

Buffalo Killer’s Goal Was To ‘Remove Gun Rights’ in US

YouTube Video VVV6MkVGRnQxczFuc091bmhwRnNHQk9RLkd5dGNVQXBKWmtB

Buffalo Killer’s Goal Was To ‘Remove Gun Rights’ in US

May 17, 2022 1:20 pm

Bill Gates Orders Adults Over 50 To Get ‘Ongoing’ Covid Boosters ‘Every 6 Months’

YouTube Video VVV6MkVGRnQxczFuc091bmhwRnNHQk9RLmVBdFZoRlVIR3J3

Bill Gates Orders Adults Over 50 To Get ‘Ongoing’ Covid Boosters ‘Every 6 Months’

May 17, 2022 11:11 am

Hunter Biden Emails Reveal He Fathered Child With ANOTHER Prostitute, Left Her Addicted to Narcotics

YouTube Video VVV6MkVGRnQxczFuc091bmhwRnNHQk9RLmZyX2lIbjBKa1pj

Hunter Biden Emails Reveal He Fathered Child With ANOTHER Prostitute, Left Her Addicted to Narcotics

May 16, 2022 7:56 pm

Subscribe

But not earthquakes like this one.

‘Nature doesn’t do right angles’

Locals began reporting that they were experiencing an unusually high amount of aftershocks for magnitude-5.2 earthquake. When this issue was investigated by seismologists, it became apparent that the local reports were right – there was a sizeable cluster of aftershocks spread over an area of approximately 5 by 3 miles.

These aftershocks were of the scale you would expect after a much larger quake, showing depths of between 9 and 15km, as opposed to the main shock at 1.4km – leaving seismologists scratching their heads.

However it was when the aftershocks were observed using earthquake reporting software that things became really interesting.

Source: http://quakes.globalincidentmap.com, 10 June 2016

Experts were shocked by the rectilinear, grid-like arrangement of the aftershocks. They were arranged in neat, easily discernible ranks and files and at one point even form an exact 90 degree angle.

A couple of hours later, after more aftershocks, the pattern changed – but still looked uncannily geometric with straight lines and right angles.

Source: http://quakes.globalincidentmap.com, 10 June 2016

There is widespread agreement among people who have been tracking earthquakes and aftershocks online for years that nobody has ever seen an aftershock pattern like this.

The unnaturally perfect geometry of this pattern raises the question, are these aftershocks being precisely caused to occur in this grid-like pattern? And if so, who or what is causing it?

You might recall that last week it was widely reported in the mainstream media that an unnamed weapons test being run out of the USSA Navy’s China Lake weapons testing facility would disrupt aerospace GPS systems – known as GPS jamming – over California and Nevada for the next month.

The China Lake weapons testing facility lies just north of where this highly irregular earthquake took place.  The irregularly patterned aftershocks you can see in the images above took place in the militarized weapons testing zone.

Is the US Navy testing a ‘seismic weapon system’?

Perhaps it is a coincidence that this most unnatural earthquake, breaking nature’s rules and baffling seismologists, has taken place in a restricted militarized zone that just announced a GPS jamming exercise so powerful they had to warn civilians about potential disruptions to their lives.

But it almost certainly isn’t a coincidence. There is enough evidence to suggest it is highly unlikely this earthquake was a natural event, and highly likely it was an unprecedented military-made seismic event.

Which raises the question – what are they doing?  Are the military playing with fire and attempting to weaponize earthquakes?  In an already active area, the consequences could be disastrous.  And if they are creating and testing a seismic weapons system, who will they use this new capability on?

With the public’s anticipation of ‘the Big One’ – a hypothetical earthquake of magnititude-8 or more expected along the San Andreas fault – at an all time high, could the government be planning to create a large scale disaster, using the public’s expectation of the Big One as cover, in order to enact martial law and militarize a large region of the country?