Noted financial analyst says while COVID pandemic wanes, excess mortality persists, likely due to vaccines Monday, May 16, 2022 by: JD Heyes

(Natural News) A financial analyst and former portfolio manager for multinational investment giant BlackRock said in a stunning interview last week on Real America’s Voice “War Room: Pandemic” broadcast that despite the waning COVID-19 outbreak, America continues to experience “excess mortality” rates, possibly due to the vaccines.

“While the COVID pandemic is winding down, excess mortality remains elevated to the surprise of many executives,” analyst Ed Dowd told host Steve Bannon. “Some are blaming” a phenomenon known as “long COVID, especially in the insurance industry.”

He went on to say that funeral homes “were expecting their business to drop off” but instead “it has not,” Dowd continued.

The analyst said that the top manager of Service Corporation International, a funeral home company, announced during an earnings call last week that the firm beat first-quarter earnings expectations by 10 percent, which was shocking to executives.

According to a tweet, Dowd quoted the executive as saying: “And again, it’s not just COVID that we’re seeing… This is, these are excess deaths, levels of mortality that are higher than what we’ve expected, even when you try to back out COVID.”

Dowd also mentioned that another major funeral home company posted increased earnings of more than 3.5 percent during the first quarter, and up a total of 9 percent from the fourth quarter of 2021, both of which were also unexpected.

“So, the smoking gun at the end of the line in the funeral homes [is] the insurance companies saw group life death benefits” come down from the fourth quarter but the levels of payouts are still elevated 20-30 percent beyond expectations, Dowd said.

According to his analysis, all told, the U.S. is still experiencing a 20-percent rise year-over-year — taking COVID into account — than normal through the first quarter.

At that point, Bannon interjected to ask Dowd his opinion as to what he believes is taking place — whether the excess deaths are due to mental fallout from extended lockdowns, whether the vaccines are causing them, or something else.

“When we saw the all-cause mortality for the millennials, I’m blaming the vaccine,” Down responded. “You can blame suicides and fentanyl deaths, but remember, in group life (insurance claims), these are employed, working-age people that tend not to overdose on fentanyl and commit suicide. There’s definitely, those things are at play, but I’ve seen people back out the numbers and they’re still elevated with excess mortality.”

“And the lockdowns, you gotta remember, that was 2020. We really haven’t had lockdowns since the end of 2021 or even today, so this is above and beyond,” Dowd continued. “You know, we’re all hearing the anecdotes. I have anecdotes in my circle (of contacts) of mysterious sudden deaths of relatively healthy people. So this is a national crisis in my mind.”

WATCH:

In a March interview with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for his “Defender” podcast, Dowd said he believes that the Food and Drug Administration is in “cover-up” mode regarding the safety shortcuts taken by vaccine makers.

“The FDA is in on the cover-up, something went down. The other tip for me was in November of last year, a friend of mine from the biotech industry discovered that Pfizer had failed their all-cause mortality endpoint. And that was not available to us when this fanfare occurred in November of 2020, when they all got excited about 95 percent efficacy,” he said.

Dowd concluded that “the FDA didn’t really look at this clinical trial data” yet rushed it through due to political pressure or “maybe straight-up bribes,” but either way, he said, the vaccines should have never been approved.

To Dowd’s point, CNN reported last month that U.S. life expectancy has been falling for two straight years at a level not seen since the World War II era.

Sources include:

CNN.com

ChildrensDefense.org

“Cobalt Magnet” is the codename for dirty bomb drills in Austin, TX – new intel on radicalized terrorists who will combine cobalt-60 with explosive suicide vests Tuesday, May 17, 2022 by: Mike Adams

(Natural News) Today’s Situation Update is one of the most impactful I’ve recorded in a while. It gets really intense in the last 15 minutes or so, as I’m covering the dirty bomb drills now taking place in Austin, Texas.

Those drills called, “Cobalt Magnet” and carried out by the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), are not merely for show. According to the NNSA announcement about the drills:

Cobalt Magnet 22 is the culmination of 18 months of planning by local, state, and federal responders. Taking place at various locations around the city, the exercise will simulate a radiological attack, enabling response personnel to practice protecting public health and safety, providing emergency relief to affected populations, and restoring essential services.

During the week, members of the public may see field teams in protective clothing using radiological monitoring and detection equipment, low-flying aircraft conducting data-gathering overflights, and groups of first responders and others staged at various locations. The exercise is part of a regular program of training, exercises and planning by which NNSA and federal, state and local partners prepare to protect public health and safety.

The dirty bomb threat is real

We have corroborating intel that says radicalized Islamic terror groups operating out of Afghanistan are making their way to the USA by exploiting Western European escape routes for Ukrainian “refugees” fleeing the war. These operators are acquiring EU documentation then traveling to the United States, where they are building explosive vests containing either traditional kinetic (explosive) charges, or a combination of explosives with the augmentation of dirty bomb material such as cobalt-60.

According to our sources, Iran is supplying weapons engineers to build these highly complex suicide vests, which have to be carefully constructed in order to maximize the dispersal of radioisotopes when the explosive charges are initiated. These vests, we’ve learned, are being engineered in a way that they can be disassembled and easily smuggled into the USA across the wide open southern border, then reassembled inside the USA, ready for deployment. Thus, they can be constructed outside the USA and brought in through the wide-open border.

The upshot is that the United States is about to be hit with radioactive dirty bombs that will target major US cities in an effort to spread mass panic and make these living areas uninhabitable. The economic disruptions that would follow such an event would be catastrophic. Think post-9/11 economic collapse, but multiplied many times. Imagine the carnage if a dirty bomb hits a major US port and shuts down logistics operations, worsening the global supply chain collapse.

Cobalt-60 has a half life of around 5.27 years, meaning its effect last for about 53 years (10 half lives). Any city that’s hit with cobalt-60 would be uninhabitable for many decades to come, unless an extraordinary decontamination effort were launched at great expense (think trillions of dollars to tear down sections of multiple US cities and then rebuild them…).

The US sends $40 billion to Ukraine but won’t protect its own southern border, leaving it wide open for terrorists

The same US government that’s about to send $40 billion to protect Ukraine’s borders won’t spend a dime protecting America’s. Because the US southern border is wide open, it allows terrorists an easy path to entering the United States and transporting radiological weapons for staging operations. These weapons can also be acquired in the U.S. by stealing medical sterilization or imaging equipment and then exploiting their radioisotopes for dirty bomb construction.

The political leaders of the United States of America have, in our view, committed treason in leaving the US southern border wide open, effectively making America deliberately vulnerable to act of war that will exploit the unprotected border. Failure to defend your nation’s own borders is an excusable — even criminal — act, especially when so much effort is being expended to defend the borders of other nations. America’s back door has effectively been left wide open for terrorists to waltz right in and start detonating dirty bombs at will, with near-zero chance of them being interdicted by border patrol.

This will become painfully obvious when the first dirty bomb is detonated in a US city — an event growing ever more likely with each passing day.

By the way, iodine offers no protection whatsoever against cobalt-60 dirty bombs. Iodine only protects the thyroid from iodine-131, which is a completely different radioisotope.

Get all the details on this and much more in today’s hard-hitting Situation Update podcast:

Brighteon.com/9ae189ec-dc9d-47b9-858a-439ee28840ba

Significant Association of COVID-19 Vaccines & Cardiovascular Safety Incidence

Has there been suppression of COVID-19 vaccine safety data? Some scientists, physicians, and journalists believe there has been, as mainstream media suggest overwhelming safety and efficacy.And while the risk for myocarditis and pericarditis among mostly young males is now acknowledged, such incidences are classified as extremely rare events. But are they? In a recent study tracking population-wide data in Israel titled, “Increased emergency cardiovascular events among under-40 population in Israel during vaccine rollout and third COVID-19 wave,” Boston and Israel-based researchers investigate vaccine safety data associated with the Israel National Emergency Medical Services (EMS) that covers data from 2019 to 2021. The study findings add to the concerns about vaccine-induced “undetected severe cardiovascular side-effects,” underscoring the already established relationship between the mRNA-based vaccines from Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) and Moderna (mRNA-1273) in young male populations.  The study authors strongly recommend that any COVID-19 vaccine and infection surveillance systems incorporate the Israeli and other national emergency data for a more comprehensive assessment of public health trends, not to mention deeper investigations into vaccine safety risks.

The study authors include Christopher Sun, Eli Jaffe, and Retsef Levi. 

Sun is a postdoctoral fellow at MIT, while Jaffe affiliates with the Israel National Emergency Medical Services as well as the Ben Gurion University of the Negev. Retsef Levi works as a professor of operational management at Sloan School of Management. 

The Study Design

The trio designed a retrospective population-based study tapping into and leveraging the national data in the IEMS system to identify calls associated with cardiovascular (CA) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) events during the duration of the study covering January 1, 2019, to June 20th, 2021. The investigators also coupled study data with SARS-CoV-2 infection rates plus retrospective vaccination rates during the same study period.

The study duration was segmented into a ‘normal period’ associated with the time prior to the outbreak (1/2019 to 2/2020) and a 10 month ‘pandemic period’ covering two waves of the pandemic, including the first wave from 3/20 to 12/20 and a second wave from 1/21 to 6/21, during which Israel initiated the vaccination program in parallel to a third wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

The goal of this design was to enable an analysis of how cardiovascular (CA) and acute cardiovascular syndrome (ACS) call counts changed over time with the various underlying background conditions in a quest to pinpoint elements associated with the observed temporal changes.

The study was reviewed by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Institutional Review Board and approved by the research committee of the IEMS.

The study authors factored into the protocol a number of data sources and study population attributes, including CA and ACS call data, vaccination, and COVID-19 infection cases. Thereafter, the researchers conducted data and statistical analysis, time-series data processing for CA and ACS calls, vaccination administration, and COVID-19 infection counts, as well as an association of year-to-year call count trends with COVID-19 infection and vaccine administration data.

Then the trio conducted a sensitivity analysis to check the robustness of associations in key underlying analytical models.

High-Level Summary

The trio conducting the study out of MIT. Israel identified 30,262 cardiac arrests and 60,398 ACS calls with the following results:

Cohort

Pop

CA

ACS

Age 16-39

3.5 million

945 (3.1%)

3945 (6.5%)

 

Confirmed COVID-19 cases during the study period?

Of the 834,573 confirmed COVID-19 cases during the study period, 572,435 (68.6%) cases were from individuals of age 16 to 39. Among the 5,506,398 patients receiving their 1st vaccination dose and 5,152,417 patients receiving their 2nd vaccination dose, 2,382,864 (43.3%) and 2,176,172 (32.2%) patients were of age 16–39, respectively.

What data did this study leverage?

EMS CA and ACS calls in Israel over a 2.5-year period, including a period before and during the outbreak. This provides a unique perspective to investigate associations between CA and ACS call volume trends during the study period against variables such as COVID-19 infections and vaccination rates.

Why is the use of the national IEMS database beneficial?

This database offers researchers access to not only the incidence of the conditions tracked, which is markedly different from other “partial and biased access,” as well as data afforded by self-reporting adverse event systems such as the CDC’s VAERS.  

Are there differences between CA and ACS EMS calls?

Yes. The study authors assume IEMS data includes nearly all relevant CA events given this call most often correlates with EMS services. Additionally, the authors post that CA diagnoses are straightforward in contrast to ACS events; the authors assume 50% of all ACS events involve hospital walk-ins and are not accounted for by MS. The authors assume a higher rate of diagnosis error with ACS events.

What is the main finding noteworthy here?

The authors show growth of greater than 25% in both the number of CA calls and ACS calls in the age 16 to 39 group during the Israeli COVID-19 vaccination rollout when compared to the same period of time in previous years (2019-2020). See table 1.

Do the authors find a “robust and statistically significant association between the weekly CA and ACS calls counts” associated with the rates of first and second vaccine doses administered to this age group?

Yes.

What about an association of CA and ACS to COVID-19 infections?

No. there is no observed statistically significant association between SARS-CoV-2 infection rates and the CA and ACS call-outs.

Do the above results match previous findings, demonstrating CA incidence isn’t always associated with higher COVID-19 infection rates at the population level?

Yes.

Do the study results align with other national results showing cardiovascular complaints associated with mass COVID-19 vaccine rollouts?

Yes. The study authors point to comparable results in Germany in addition to more EMS calls for cardiac incidents in Scotland. See Robert Koch-Institut, 2021, and Public Health Scotland—COVID-19 wider impacts on the health care system

Do other data evidence an association of the COVID-19 jabs to CA and ACS?

Yes. For example, visuals showcased in figures 1 and 2 (see study source) “support and reinforce these findings.” The authors point out that the rise in CA and ACS calls commencing by the start of 2021 tracked closely to the administration of the second COVID-19 vaccine dose.

Do these findings match other similar findings?

Yes. Some data shows greater adverse events associated with myocarditis after the second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. See “COVID-19 Vaccine safety updates Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP),” June 23, 2021.

Does the data overall point to a growth in cases of CA and ACS in the age 16 to 39 population parallel to vaccination rollout?

Yes. The authors report the association with the vaccination rates could be consistent with the “known causal relationship” associated with mRNA vaccines and incidents of myocarditis in young people. The authors share multiple citations. They note myocarditis is often mistaken for ACS and that asymptomatic myocarditis “can be associated with unexplained sudden death among young adults from CA.”

Does this study data support the more anecdotal reports pointing to sudden cardiac death right after the COVID-19 vaccinations?

Yes. See Verma, A. K., Lavine, K. J. & Lin, C.-Y. Myocarditis after Covid-19 mRNA vaccination. N. Engl. J. Med. (2021) and Choi, S. et al. Myocarditis-induced sudden death after BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in Korea: Case report focusing on histopathological findings. J. Korean Med. Sci. 36, 66 (2021).

In the case of myocarditis associated with the COVID-19 vaccines, are females underdiagnosed?

Possibly. The authors acknowledge research mostly associated vaccine-related myocarditis with males, and they report that “the relative increases of CA and ACS events [reported in Table 1] was larger in females.”  If this doesn't represent an underdiagnosis of females it could also represent “other unique patterns…. consistent with the ongoing challenge of gender-related differences related to cardiovascular disease diagnosis and care.”

What policy and related safety implications are generated by this study?

The introduction of surveillance programs of potential COVID-19 vaccine side effects as well as COVID-19 infection outcomes to be paired with EMS as well as other health data in the quest to better identify public health trends with more impetus to rapidly investigate the possible root causes.

This is mission-critical to raise patient and doctor awareness related to suspect symptoms (chest discomfort, shortness of breath) after vaccination or COVID-19 infection to minimize risk to patients—especially with younger populations including females. Mission-critical considering the continued booster vaccination due to waning immunity of the COVID-19 vaccines against variants.

What study limitations do the authors disclose?

This study data and findings rely on aggregated data that don’t include specific data about the affected patients—such as hospital outcomes data, underlying comorbidities, and the vaccination and COVID-19 status of the patient.

TrialSite notes that this omission impacts the strength of the evidence given the above data helps researchers assess a more precise diagnosis behind the growth in both CA and ACS calls in young people paired to underlying causal factors.

The authors note that the Israeli Ministry of Health, as well as large HMOs in that nation with a heavily vaccinated population, have access to the aforementioned data and could be incorporated into future studies.

A number of other limiting factors exist for this study data.

Conclusion

The authors point out:

“The significant increases in CA calls and ACS calls among the 16–39 age population during the COVID-19 vaccination rollout highlights the value of additional data sources, such as those from EMS systems, that can supplement self-reporting surveillance systems in identifying concerning public health trends. Moreover, it underscores the need for the thorough investigation of the apparent association between COVID-19 vaccine administration and adverse cardiovascular outcomes among young adults. Israel and other countries should immediately collect the data necessary to determine whether such association indeed exists, including thorough investigation of individual CA and ACS cases in young adults, and their potential connection to the vaccine or other factors. This would be critical to better understanding the risk-benefits of the vaccine and to inform related public policy and prevent potentially avoidable patient harm. In the interim, it is vital that following vaccination, patients should be instructed to seek appropriate emergency care if they are experiencing symptoms potentially associated with myocarditis, such as chest discomfort and shortness of breath, as well as consider avoiding strenuous physical activity following the vaccination that may induce severe adverse cardiac events.”

Lead Research/Investigator

Christopher Sun, a postdoctoral fellow at MIT

Eli Jaffe, Israel National Emergency Medical Services as well as Ben Gurion University of the Negev and Retsef Levi

Retsef Levi, professor of operational management at Sloan School of Management

COVID-19 vaccine shedding can harm the unvaccinated and cause serious health problems like fist-sized blood clots Friday, May 13, 2022 by: Arsenio Toledo

(Natural News) The shedding effect of Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines is affecting even the unvaccinated, causing serious health complications including blood clots so massive they’re almost the size of a person’s fist.

This is what happened to Ananda, an unvaccinated and board-certified practitioner in acupuncture and oriental medicine. She spoke with Stew Peters on the latter’s “The Stew Peters Show” about how she started experiencing severe health complications the more she came into contact with fully vaccinated patients. (Related: Fully vaccinated individuals are SHEDDING GRAPHENE and infecting the unvaccinated, causing serious health complications.)

As evidence, Ananda referred to recently published Pfizer documents that prove the shedding from COVID-19 vaccines can be transmitted through inhalation or skin contact.

“The first months of my patients getting vaccinated, I was not aware of this shedding,” said Ananda. “The more I researched into it, the more I realized this was exactly what was happening to me, and it got to the point where I would even have a freshly vaccinated person on my table, and while treating them [I would] start dropping massive clots.”

Since she started experiencing health issues after being in close contact with the fully vaccinated, Ananda has been forced to shut down her practice and keep her distance from people who have taken the COVID-19 vaccines.

It took four months for her irregular bleeding and the clots to disappear, but she has since recovered from the effects of exposure to COVID-19 vaccine shedding.

Pfizer admits in documents COVID-19 vaccine shedding is occurring

The Pfizer document Ananda refers to is part of the latest series of documents the Food and Drug Administration was forced to publish regarding Pfizer and its COVID-19 vaccine trials.

One of the documents is titled “A Phase 1/2/3 Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Observer-Blind, Dose-Finding Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 RNA Vaccine Candidates Against COVID-19 in Healthy Individuals.”

This document contains a whole section, Section 8.3.5, covering the possibility of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine shedding. In this section, Pfizer essentially admits that it is possible for those who are in close proximity to people who received Pfizer’s vaccine to suffer severe adverse reactions.

Specifically, this section describes how pregnant or breastfeeding women exposed to the Pfizer mRNA COVID-19 vaccine during the trials had to be reported to Pfizer’s safety teams within 24 hours of exposure.

“This is strange because pregnant women and new mothers were and are not part of the safety trials,” wrote the Expose in an article covering the latest Pfizer document release. “So how can they be exposed?”

This section of the document confirmed that pregnant and breastfeeding women can be environmentally exposed to the viral shedding of the mRNA vaccine, either through inhalation or skin contact.

“In layman’s terms, Pfizer is admitting in this document that it is possible to expose another human being to the mRNA COVID vaccine just by breathing the same air or touching the skin of the person who has been vaccinated,” wrote the Expose.

Learn more about the COVID-19 vaccines and vaccine shedding at VaccineDamage.news.

Watch this clip from “The Stew Peters Show” as host Stew Peters speaks with Ananda about the health complications she had experienced following close contact with fully vaccinated patients.

China Caught in Its Wuhan Lockdown Lies

Did China really suppress the coronavirus in its Wuhan lockdown of early 2020, or was the claimed success of the lockdowns all a hoax? So successful was the dramatic drop in cases during the Wuhan lockdown that World Health Organization told the rest of the world to abandon their preplanned pandemic responses and lockdown their nations like China did. So we followed World Health Organization's advice. The end result had a disastrous impact on global populations, and World Health Organization soon admitted that the lockdowns in other nations weren't eliminating the virus. Yet, China continues to press on with lockdowns today as part of its Zero-Covid Policy, determined to repeat its success of Wuhan 2020.

So why did China’s lockdown appear to be so successful in 2020. The answer most likely lies in the fact that China altered its case definition of the illness caused by the coronavirus, which China eventually named novel coronavirus pneumonia at the time. In fact, the case definition of the illness was changed eight times in China by early March, 2020. Can We Believe Any of China’s Coronavirus Numbers? | Time.

When China's case definition broadened, cases sky rocketed. When the case definition narrowed, cases dropped like a stone. It’s not hard to understand why the glorious leaders of the country opted for narrow case definitions to suppress novel coronavirus pneumonia, eventually named coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by World Health Organization. If you want to make the COVID-19 pandemic disappear, just change the case definition.

But now the Chinese government is caught up in its own lies. More widespread testing available in China today shows the viral infection is still present, no matter how you define the cases. The truth is that lockdowns never eliminated the virus back in 2020! But truth is scarce in the Chinese Communist Party, and today's lockdown fraud continues while the country suffers through China's Zero-Covid Policy.

Exclusive: Pilots Injured by COVID Vaccines Speak Out: ‘I Will Probably Never Fly Again’

As a commercial pilot, Bob Snow had long looked forward to seeing his daughter follow in his footsteps by helping her learn to fly an airplane.

However, having received the COVID-19 vaccine “under duress,” this dream is no longer a possibility for Snow.

“I will probably never fly again,” Snow said in a video he made about his story. “I was hoping to teach my daughter to fly. She wants to be a pilot. That will probably never happen, all courtesy of the vaccine.”

Snow is one of a growing number of pilots coming forward to share stories of injuries they experienced after getting a COVID-19 vaccine.

Some of these accounts are “hair-raising and deeply disturbing,” according to Maureen Steele, a paralegal and head of media relations for the John Pierce Law Firm.

The firm represents U.S. Freedom Flyers (USFF), an organization opposing vaccine and mask mandates for pilots and airline staff, in a series of legal actions against the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and several airlines.

Josh Yoder, a pilot with a major commercial airline, Army combat veteran and former flight medic, is a co-founder of USFF.

In a recent interview with The Defender, Yoder said the FAA has been aware of cases of pilots suffering vaccine injuries since at least December 2021, when the California-based Advocates for Citizens’ Rights hand-delivered an open letter to the FAA, major airlines and their insurers.

Yoder said USFF “has received hundreds of phone calls from airline employees who are experiencing adverse reactions post COVID-19 vaccination,” describing the stories as “heartbreaking.”

According to Yoder, the warnings contained in the letter, including testimony by “world-renowned experts,” were “completely ignored,” adding that “we are now beginning to see the consequences.”

This is leading an increasing number of pilots to “come forward to expose the truth regarding these toxic injections,” Yoder said.

The Defender recently reported on a series of reports that have been submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, or VAERS, involving pilots who sustained severe injuries and side effects following the COVID-19 vaccine.

Congressional testimony from Cody Flint, an agricultural pilot who has logged more than 10,000 flight hours, was included in this letter.

“The FAA has created a powder keg and lit the fuse,” Flint said in an interview with The Defender.

“We are now seeing pilots experiencing blood clots, myocarditis, pericarditis, dizziness and confusion at rates never seen before. Pilots are losing their careers and having to call in sick or go on medical leave from medical issues developing almost immediately after vaccination.”

Vaccine-injured pilots share stories with The Defender

Several pilots, including Bob Snow, shared their stories with The Defender in a recent series of interviews.

Snow, a captain with a major U.S. airline, told The Defender he received the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine on Nov. 4, 2021, “as a result of an unambivalent company mandate to receive the vaccine or be terminated.”

According to Snow, he “began experiencing issues a little over two months” after receiving the vaccine. Due to a history of gastroenteritis, he underwent an endoscopy and an abdominal CT scan.

The results of the endoscopy were normal and Snow was awaiting the results of the CT scan when he suffered cardiac arrest on April 9, immediately after landing at Dallas-Forth Worth International Airport.

1 Million Copies Sold — ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’ — The book that launched a movement. BUY TODAY!

As Snow described it:

“I was very lucky to have collapsed when and where I did, as the aircraft was shut down at the gate post-flight and care was immediately provided.

“There was absolutely no warning preceding my collapse in the cockpit. It was literally as if someone ‘pulled the plug.’”

After receiving CPR and AED (automated external defibrillator) shocks to be revived, Snow spent almost a week in the hospital, where he was diagnosed with having sustained sudden cardiac arrest (SCA).

Medical studies indicate survival rates for out-of-hospital SCA cases are estimated at 10.8% to 11.4%.

Snow said:

“Needless to say, that’s not an encouraging number and I feel very, very lucky to have survived.

“Had this happened in a hotel, in flight, at home or almost anywhere else, I do not believe I would be here right now.”

Snow said prior to this incident, he had “no history of prior significant cardiac issues,” based on two EKGs (electrocardiograms) per year for each of the previous 10 years — none of which, according to Snow, “provided any indication of incipient issues that might lead to cardiac arrest.”

“I have no known family history to indicate a predisposition to developing significant cardiac issues at this point in my life,” Snow added.

Snow has been recuperating at home since April 15, while awaiting more tests that will provide a prognosis for his long-term survival.

However, it is likely that he will never fly again in any capacity.

Snow said, “[f]or now, it appears my flying career — indeed, likely all flying as a pilot —  has come to a rapid and unexpected conclusion as SCA is a red flag to FAA medical certification.”

This, according to Snow, has resulted “in a significant loss of income and lifestyle,” adding that he has a college student and high school student at home and a non-working spouse who relied on his livelihood.

‘Last thing I remember is . . . praying I would make it’

Like Snow, Cody Flint had no prior medical history to indicate he was at risk.

“I have been extremely healthy my whole life with no underlying conditions,” said Flint, adding:

“As a pilot that held a second-class medical [certification], I was required to get a yearly FAA flight physical to show I was healthy enough to safely operate an airplane.

“I have renewed my medical every year since I was 17. The last FAA medical I received was on January 19, 2021. The medical showed I was perfectly healthy just 10 days before receiving the COVID-19 vaccine.”

Flint got his first (and only) dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine on Feb. 1, 2021. He told The Defender:

“Within 30 minutes, I developed a severe burning headache at the base of my skull and blurred vision. After a few hours, the pain was constant, but didn’t seem to be getting worse. I thought the pain would go away, eventually. It did not.”

Two days later began his seasonal job as an agricultural pilot, which typically runs from February to October of each year, Flint said.

He said:

“Approximately one hour into my flight, I felt my condition starting to rapidly decline and I was developing severe tunnel vision. I pulled my airplane up to turn around to head home and immediately felt an extreme burst of pressure in my skull and ears.”

Flint initially considered landing on a nearby highway, unsure he’d make it back to the airstrip, but chose not to so as not to put the public in danger.

Instead, according to Flint:

“The last thing I remember is seeing our airstrip from a few miles out and praying I would make it.

“Later, my coworkers told me I landed and immediately stopped my plane. They described me as being unresponsive, shaking and slumped over in my seat … I do not remember landing or being pulled from the plane.”

Flint said various doctors, including his longtime hometown doctor, refused to consider that his recent COVID-19 vaccination caused his symptoms. Instead, he was prescribed Meclizine for vertigo and Xanax for panic attacks.

According to Flint, doctors told him he would be “completely better within two days.” But two days later, Flint “could barely walk without falling over.”

Seeking a second opinion, Flint visited the Ear & Balance Institute in Louisiana, where he was diagnosed with left and right perilymphatic fistulas (a lesion in the inner ear), and highly elevated intracranial pressure due to swelling in his brainstem.

As Flint described it, “[m]y intracranial pressure had risen so high that it caused both of my inner ears to ‘blow out.’” Doctors told him this is usually caused by major head trauma.

“Obviously, I did not have head trauma,” said Flint. “What I did have, though, was an unapproved and experimental ‘vaccine’ just two days prior to suffering this bodily damage.”

“My doctors [at the Ear & Balance Institute] clearly stated my health issues were a direct result of a severe adverse reaction to the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine,” he added.

Flint says he now cannot receive renewed medical certification from the FAA due to the injuries he sustained, the physical condition he is currently in and “the fact that I will be on the FAA-unapproved medicine Diamox for the foreseeable future.”

Like Snow, Flint believes “it is … highly unlikely that I’ll ever be able to fly again,” adding, “On most days, I am too dizzy to even safely drive a vehicle.”

Greg Pierson, like Snow and Flint, shared a similar story. A commercial pilot with a major U.S. airline that is also a federal contractor, he was mandated to get vaccinated.

Pierson told The Defender:

“I felt extremely pressured to consider getting vaccinated, even though I am adamant against any mandates that violate personal freedom choices.

“I did research and consulted several medical professionals regarding the associated risks.

“I have never had a flu shot in my lifetime, so this was not something I wanted to do. I reluctantly received the first dose of the Pfizer vaccine on August 26, 2021.”

For Pierson, the onset of symptoms was almost immediate, beginning “approximately 14 hours” after receiving the vaccine, when he experienced “an extremely erratic and highly elevated heart rate.”

Pierson visited a local emergency room, where he was diagnosed with atrial fibrillation. His condition was stabilized and he was soon discharged, though he remained on medication to help his heart return to a normal rhythm.

While Pierson says he has not experienced any further episodes, he nevertheless still has not been cleared to return to the cockpit.

Subscribe to The Defender - It’s Free!

  • Name*

  • Email*

“I successfully passed all the required protocols to re-obtain my certification that will allow me to return to work,” he said, adding the FAA has had his records and test results since Feb. 16, but he still hasn’t received a determination.

“I have been on disability since this occurrence, and combined with the leave, the personal and financial impacts have been significant,” Pierson said.

Pierson also described a similar experience to that of Flint, regarding the attitudes of some medical professionals regarding the possibility that his condition was brought on by the COVID-19 vaccine.

“When I brought the subject up to the ER cardiologist, that it was obvious what triggered my onset, she simply stated ‘s*it happens,’” Pierson said.

Widow describes husband’s last days

Snow, Flint and Pierson are fortunate in that they have managed to survive, even if their flying careers are in jeopardy.

But other pilots have not been so lucky.

American Airlines pilot Wilburn Wolfe suffered a major seizure following his COVID-19 vaccination, which cost him his life. Fortunately, Wolfe was not on duty when his seizure hit.

Claudia Wolfe, his widow, shared her late husband’s story with The Defender.

Wolfe, a former Marine just a few years from retirement, “was definitely against getting this vaccine but was put in the position to take it or lose his job as a captain,” Claudia Wolfe said.

He received the Johnson & Johnson vaccine on Nov. 9, 2021.

Claudia Wolfe told The Defender:

“[The] first 10 days were without any event … [on] day 11, it started with a migraine-like headache which got better that afternoon after taking a couple of aspirin.

“Unfortunately, the migraine came back and he was hoping that it’s nothing else but a migraine.

“On November 22, 13 days after the COVID vaccine, he had a seizure. When paramedics arrived and my husband came out of the seizure, he was paralyzed on his right side, arm and leg, and was taken to the emergency room.”

At the emergency room, a CT scan showed he was experiencing brain bleeding, and he was admitted into intensive care. There, according to Claudia Wolfe, “he continued to have convulsions on his right hand … shortly after he was admitted, he had another seizure and doctors decided to sedate him and put him on a ventilator.”

“That was the last time I talked to my husband, before the seizure in the ICU,” Claudia Wolfe said.

Wolfe never regained consciousness and died on Nov. 26, 2021 — only 17 days after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. Even if he had survived, he likely would not have been able to work as a pilot again.

As Claudia Wolfe explained:

“Doctors told me that he couldn’t work as a pilot anymore because he would have to be on seizure medication.

“But as the bleeding continued to spread I was told that he probably would not recognize me or his family and he probably would need a 24-hour facility to help him.

“This man was so strong and never needed a doctor, he was never sick enough to need one, and [he] just had a physical a couple months prior for his job as a pilot.”

Pilots describe culture of fear and reluctance to come forward

Pilots who spoke to The Defender described a culture of intimidation that has led to many of their colleagues fearing professional or personal consequences if they speak publicly about injuries following COVID-19 vaccination.

According to Yoder, “Many pilots and other airline employees capitulated to the tactics of threats, harassment and intimidation perpetrated by the very companies they serve.”

Yoder described airlines, as well as aviation industry unions, as “state actors” illegally “working in lockstep with the U.S. government” to “enforce unconstitutional mandates via a culture of fear.”

Snow told The Defender several of his colleagues shared stories of vaccine injuries with him:

“Since my SCA I have heard from several other airline personnel regarding potential vaccine injuries up to and including cardiac issues (chest pain and myocarditis).

“Many crewmembers are very reluctant to divulge potential significant health issues for fear of losing their FAA medical certification and, potentially, their careers.”

According to Snow, such fear exists “due to both concern for one’s career and also the fear of being portrayed as a vaccine skeptic.”

“There seems to be genuine reluctance on the part of corporations, businesses, government and the medical community in general to acknowledge the potential for COVID vaccine injury,” Snow said.

Claudia Wolfe also shared her experience, stating that following her husband’s death, she learned “of others that died after the COVID vaccine,” adding that “not many talk about it or believe this vaccine can harm or kill you.”

Pierson also expressed concerns, telling The Defender, “Some things I have stated publicly could have consequences in this regard.”

This culture of intimidation appears to extend beyond just accusations of being a “vaccine skeptic.”

Steele described incidents of airline employees’ non-work and online activities seemingly being monitored by their employers, who are then using this as a justification to question or harass those employees.

“I believe the airlines have people on staff that must be trolling the social media of employees and when they find a conservative, or someone they believe to be, they attack,” Steele said.

Steele said female employees appear to be particular targets of the airlines, as they “appear to be isolated and intimidated for hours on end.”

Flint connected incidents such as those described above to political interests, telling The Defender the FAA approved COVID-19 vaccines for pilots just two days after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued its first Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for such vaccines, on Dec. 10, 2020.

“I thought to myself, how could the FAA analyze the data and determine it was safe for pilots in just two days, when it took the FDA months to go over the trial data?” Flint said.

Flint said that was an especially jarring development, in light of the increased risk that pilots and cabin crew face:

“I was also extremely curious to know how the FAA is so certain that this vaccine will be safe for pilots when it’s obvious that Pfizer did not do a trial solely on pilots to find out if it would cause some of the serious health problems that immediately started to show up once the mass vaccination campaign [began].”

In the process, Flint stated, the FAA violated its own regulations.

Under the Guide for Aviation Medical Examiners: Pharmaceuticals (Therapeutic Medications) Do Not Issue – Do Not Fly, the FAA has a long-standing rule that states:

“FAA requires at least one year of post-marketing experience with a new drug before consideration for aeromedical certification purposes. This observation allows time for uncommon, but aeromedically significant, adverse reactions to manifest themselves.”

Flint said it “became painfully obvious” the FAA issued this guidance based not on science or safety, but political reasons.

“Why did the FAA abandon its own rules by encouraging pilots to take a brand-new experimental drug?” Flint asked. “This action by the FAA was totally unprecedented and extremely dangerous.”

Providing an example of such danger, Flint said, “it is now widely reported that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines can cause blood clots,” adding that several peer-reviewed studies going back more than a decade “show pilots are approximately 60% more likely to experience blood clots due to the ‘nature of the job.’”

Supporting this assertion, on May 5, the FDA announced that it would restrict who could receive doses of the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine, due to the risk of blood clots.

Pierson also believes politics are at play in the medical community, telling The Defender even his longtime doctor told the FAA, in paperwork aimed at restoring Pierson’s suspended medical certification, that “it is impossible for the vaccine to have caused” his condition, though “he could not provide any explanation for an alternative hypothesis” — a stance Pierson characterized as “medical malpractice.”

Such politics are also found in professional organizations within the aviation industry, according to Pierson, who described his experience with one such entity:

“I approached the medical division of ALPA, the Air Line Pilots Association, to which I am a member, and presented them with data to substantiate my concerns.

“It was initially seemingly a concerned, open dialogue, which quickly was dismissed at the highest levels.”

Legal actions to follow against the FAA, federal agencies, airlines

The USFF, according to Yoder, is currently pursuing several legal actions related to the vaccine injuries that pilots and air staff are increasingly reporting.

He told The Defender:

“The U.S. Freedom Flyers have always taken a strong stance against the threats of government and corporate totalitarianism.

“We are filing massive, individual plaintiff lawsuits against the FAA, DOT [U.S. Department of Transportation] and commercial airlines to hold them accountable for the criminal and civil atrocities they’ve committed against our members.

“We will not rest until justice is served and constitutional American freedom is restored.”

Steele added:

“We are teeing up lawsuits for all the major airlines, with thousands of potential plaintiffs on our plaintiff lists.

“We also are going to be holding the FAA and the [U.S. Department of Transportation] accountable for their part in this atrocity.”

Steele said USFF “will be seeking retribution and restitution for these crimes against humanity,” mirroring remarks made by Pierson, who described the actions taken in the name of the pandemic as “nothing short of the highest crimes against humanity ever.”

According to Steele, unions are, in part, responsible for the injuries being sustained by pilots and other employees, as a result of their acceptance of vaccine mandates.

“Unfortunately the unions — from all industries — have let their members down,” Steele told The Defender. “They simply are rolling over and are in bed with the state and the corporations.”

Flint, in turn, assigned a significant amount of blame to the federal agencies:

“The FAA has failed at its duties in the most spectacular fashion, causing pilots to lose their lives, livelihoods and careers.

“The federal government, including the FAA, has not helped one single person injured by the COVID-19 vaccine.

“They [the federal agencies] have not publicly acknowledged there is a problem. They haven’t even so much as adjusted their ‘guidance’ to prevent this from happening in the future.”

Are passengers at risk from pilot vaccine mandates?

When Snow suffered cardiac arrest, it occurred only a few minutes after he had landed a commercial airliner, full of passengers, at one of the most heavily trafficked airports in the U.S.

This begs the question: Are passengers — and the public at large — at risk due to potential adverse effects that may impact vaccinated pilots during flight?

It's Time to Follow the Science. Join our Campaign!

According to Pierson, there is indeed a risk of a “catastrophic” incident:

“I became an outspoken critic of the vaccines after my injury, and due to becoming much more knowledgeable of all the potential health and safety risks from the vaccines.

“It became very clear to me that the implications of having an immediate, severe adverse reaction could be catastrophic if actively piloting an aircraft.”

Flint believes such a disaster may be an inevitability.

“It is only a matter of time before a pilot has a medically significant event from an adverse reaction to this [COVID-19] vaccine and crashes an airliner, killing a few hundred American citizens in the process.”

He added:

“When will the FAA finally do the right thing by trying to adhere to its own mission statement, which is ‘to provide the safest, most efficient aerospace system in the world’?

“How many more pilots have to die or be severely injured before the FAA acknowledges the horrible and dangerous problem it has created?”

In addition to the risk of a disaster involving casualties among passengers and the general public, the difficulties that pilots are experiencing as a result of vaccine-related adverse reactions are creating other disruptions for the airline industry and the flying public, such as flight cancellations and delays.

Yoder described this as a “ripple effect”:

“Vaccine mandates are having a ripple effect in the aviation industry that will continue for years to come.

“Pilot shortages were a concern pre-mandate, [and] have now been amplified due to early retirements and medical disqualification due to certain adverse vaccine reactions which prohibit pilots from maintaining medical certification.”

Pilots, advocates describe importance of speaking out

The pilots, legal professionals and advocates who spoke to The Defender all expressed their hope that by speaking out and sharing their stories and experiences, they will make a difference.

Snow said:

“I hope to shine the spotlight on the potential for significant safety issues that exist within the airlines, commercial vehicles/transportation, and other safety-sensitive work that might be affected by [the] sudden onset of health issues that could be attributed to the COVID vaccines.

“It is in our collective best interest that real research and data analysis be undertaken to address this potentially dangerous situation.

“Why is there such a reluctance to investigate these EUA COVID vaccines which are still being aggressively marketed to, if not outright forced upon, the global public?”

Snow went on to discuss the history of unsafe drugs and therapies that had initially received FDA approval and the importance of “clinical and scientific studies to evaluate the possibility of injuries and deaths” instead of “parroting the marketing mantra ‘safe and effective.’”

Flint described the FAA’s handling of the issue as “one of the most glaring instances of incompetence and corruption I have ever witnessed,” adding that “the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine has taken nearly everything from myself and my family … my health and my career have been taken from me.”

He added that due to his inability to fly, he is facing mounting debt and unpaid taxes, with an income “20% of what it was before vaccination.”

Steele, who also organized the People’s Convoy, expressed her view that “[t]he only way to push back on the government and corporate overstep is demanding accountability … to hold these policymakers unequivocally accountable.”

She specifically referenced the importance of pursuing legal claims, telling The Defender:

“The only way to ensure it never happens again is to hit them in the pocketbook … In doing so, the awarded damages will also assist the victims of these policies that have been so grievously harmed.”

Yoder described the resistance he has observed to such private and government mandates, saying that “Americans have rallied in defiance to the totalitarian dictators dubbed ‘government,’” adding that “American patriots will never succumb to totalitarianism.”

Steele drew upon her experience with the People’s Convoy to share her own observation of wide public opposition to such mandates, while expressing a message of hope:

“My greatest takeaway and the most refreshing finding on the Convoy was that patriotism is alive and well in our great country.

“The American people have had it with the nonsense with the overstepping, with the ‘PC police,’ the degrading of morality in our country. They are simply over it and looking for actionable items that they can do.

“They want to see accountability. They want to see our country restored … It is important for people to know they are absolutely not alone. In fact, we are the majority.”

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pilots-injured-covid-vaccines-speak/

EU, U.K. Join U.S. in Launching Online ‘Disinformation’ Policies, Prompting Concerns About ‘One-World Governance’ of Social Media

The European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA) and the U.K.’s proposed Online Safety Bill are among the latest government policies designed to hold social media companies responsible for hate speech and “disinformation” posted by users.

Experts interviewed by The Defender expressed concerns about the potential slippery slope of regulations — in the U.S. and overseas — which, under the guise of “combating disinformation,” stifle the spread of information deemed inconvenient for governments and other powerful actors.

As reported by The Defender, in the U.S., these proposals include a government “disinformation board” and a bill pending before Congress, the Digital Services Oversight and Safety Act.

The EU’s new regulations, experts said, may have far-reaching impacts beyond Europe.

Michael Rectenwald, author of “Google Archipelago: The Digital Gulag and the Simulation of Freedom,” said he can foresee a future in which such regulations might affect all speech — not just speech on social media platforms.

Rectenwald told The Defender:

“[T]he EU’s DSA represents a major step toward one-world governance of social media and Internet search and one step closer to global government.

“Since the distinction between ‘on-line’ and ‘off-line’ activity will lose all meaning as the Internet includes the Internet of Things and Bodies, the DSA may become the law of the land.”

Is EU’s Digital Services Act on collision course with Musk’s Twitter plans?

In timing that coincided with Elon Musk’s intent to purchase Twitter, the EU announced April 23 the passage of the Digital Services Act (DSA).

The DSA seeks to tackle the spread of “misinformation and illegal content” and will apply “to all online intermediaries providing services in the EU,” in proportion to “the nature of the services concerned” and the number of users of each platform.

According to the DSA, “very large online platforms” (VLOPs) and “very large online search engines” (VLOSEs) — those with more than 45 million monthly active users in the EU — will be subject to the most stringent of the DSA’s requirements.

Big Tech companies will be obliged to perform annual risk assessments to ascertain the extent to which their platforms “contribute to the spread of divisive material that can affect issues like health,” and independent audits to determine the steps the companies are taking to prevent their platforms from being “abused.”

These steps come as part of a broader crackdown on the “spread of disinformation” called for by the Act, requiring platforms to “flag hate speech, eliminate any kind of terrorist propaganda” and implement “frameworks to quickly take down illicit content.”

Regarding alleged “disinformation,” these platforms will be mandated to create a “crisis response mechanism” to combat the spread of such content, with the Act specifically citing the conflict between Russia and Ukraine and the “manipulation” of online content that has ensued.

The DSA also will ban certain types of advertising on digital platforms, including targeted ads tailored to children or to people of specific ethnicities or sexual orientations.

Tech companies also will be required to increase transparency in the form of providing regulators and researchers “access to data on how their systems recommend content to users.”

This latter point appears similar to Musk’s plans to make Twitter’s algorithms “open source to increase trust.”

Companies violating the provisions of the DSA would risk fines of up to 6% of their total global annual revenue, while repeat offenses may result in the platforms being banned from the EU — despite the “open internet” principle professed by the principle of “net neutrality” enshrined in EU law.

According to Techcrunch, the DSA will not fully come into effect until early 2024. However, rules for VLOPs have a shorter implementation period and may be enforced by early 2023.

A spokesperson for the European Commission — the EU’s executive branch — said the new regulations will ensure Big Tech’s “power over public debate is subject to democratically validated rules, in particular on transparency and accountability.”

Margrethe Vestager, the vice president of the European Commission, added, “With today’s agreement we ensure that platforms are held accountable for the risks their services can pose to society and citizens,” and, “With the DSA we help create a safe and accountable online environment.”

Directly addressing Musk, the European Commission’s internal market commissioner, Thierry Breton, tweeted, “Be it cars or social media, any company operating in Europe needs to comply with our rules — regardless of their shareholding. Mr. Musk knows this well,” adding, “[Musk] is familiar with European rules on automotive [referring to Musk’s ownership of Tesla Motors], and will quickly adapt to the Digital Services Act.”

Separately, Breton stated, “We welcome everyone. We are open but on our conditions. At least we know what to tell him: ‘Elon, there are rules. You are welcome but these are our rules. It’s not your rules which will apply here.’”

Breton’s warning to Musk bears a striking resemblance to the statements of then-German finance minister Wolfgang Schaeuble, who in 2015 warned the newly elected left-wing Greek government not to entertain thoughts about renegotiating the austerity measures imposed on the country by the EU and International Monetary Fund, stating, “Elections change nothing. There are rules.”

Voice of America, a media outlet reflective of official U.S. government policy, reported “the job of reining in a Musk-led Twitter could fall to Europe,” referring to the DSA.

According to Gizmodo, the EU’s new legislation “could have global reverberations,” adding, “Lawmakers are also hoping it could serve as a model for other countries like India and Japan.”

However, Gizmodo warns the success of the DSA in accomplishing its objectives is far from guaranteed, referring to the example of the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): “Some predicted [the GDPR] would fundamentally shift online privacy protection worldwide, and instead [it] basically just gave us those insufferable cookie permission pop-ups.”

While the DSA would apply to all 27 EU member states, some of these countries have already enacted similar domestic legislation. For instance, Germany has regulations in place that require digital platforms to remove hate speech within 24 hours or face fines of up to €50 million ($56 million).

Techcrunch, in reporting on the passage of the DSA, referred to legislation in countries not frequently noted for their democratic traditions or respect for free speech, such as China, Turkey, India and Nigeria.

As Techcrunch stated, platforms in these countries found to be “non-compliant” with domestic mandates may face fines, police raids, shutdowns and prison sentences for their executives.

Similar regulations pending in U.K.

Legislation similar to the DSA, the Online Safety Bill, is pending in the U.K. It would require Big Tech platforms to moderate “illegal” and “harmful” content in order to be allowed to operate in the U.K.

The bill would require digital platforms to protect users from such “harmful” content, with the threat of fines of up to 10% of global turnover for companies found in violation, as well as potential prison time for senior managers of these companies in cases of non-compliance.

A spokesperson for the U.K. government said:

“Twitter and all social media platforms must protect their users from harm on their sites.

“We are introducing new online safety laws to safeguard children, prevent abusive behaviour and protect free speech.

“All tech firms with users in the U.K. will need to comply with the new laws or face hefty fines and having their sites blocked.”

Max Blain, a spokesperson for U.K. prime minister Boris Johnson, said, “Regardless of ownership, all social media platforms must be responsible” for “protecting” users.

As The Defender recently reported, Damian Collins, a member of the British parliament with the British Labour Party who led a parliamentary committee that developed the Online Safety Bill, is a board member of the Center for Combating Digital Hate, which partners with prominent “fact-checking” firm NewsGuard.

As previously reported by The Defender, NewsGuard, in turn, closely collaborates with the World Health Organization (WHO), which also recently expressed concerns about Musk’s purchase of Twitter.

As U.S., EU  sign commitment to ‘democratic values’ on the internet as they prepare policies to regulate online speech

Overshadowed by the news of Musk’s Twitter purchase and developments such as the DSA and the Biden administration’s “disinformation board,” several dozen countries quietly signed the “Declaration for the Future of the Internet” April 28.

Fifty-six countries and entities, including the U.S. and the EU, signed this declaration, described as “a political commitment to push rules for the internet that are underpinned by democratic values” and a response to Russia “wielding internet disruptions as a part of its escalating attacks on Ukraine.”

U.S. News reports that the declaration — which is not legally binding — is the first of its kind globally, and “protects human rights, promotes free flow of information, protects the privacy of users, and sets rules for a growing global digital economy among steps to counter what two Biden administration officials called a ‘dangerous new model’ of internet policy from countries such as Russia and China.”

According to the U.S. State Department, the declaration’s principles include:

  • Protect human rights and fundamental freedoms of all people.

  • Promote a global Internet that advances the free flow of information.

  • Advance inclusive and affordable connectivity so that all people can benefit from the digital economy.

  • Promote trust in the global digital ecosystem, including through protection of privacy.

  • Protect and strengthen the multi-stakeholder approach to governance that keeps the Internet running for the benefit of all.

In turn, the declaration was described by the EU as being “in line with the rights and principles strongly anchored in the EU.”

EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, known for her strong support of digital “vaccine passports” throughout the EU, stated:

“Today, for the first time, like-minded countries from all over the world are setting out a shared vision for the future of the Internet, to make sure that the values we hold true offline are also protected online, to make the Internet a safe place and trusted space for everyone, and to ensure that the Internet serves our individual freedom.

“Because the future of the Internet is also the future of democracy, of humankind.”

Thierry Breton remarked:

“This Declaration will ensure that the Internet and the use of digital technologies reinforce, not weaken, democracy and respect for human rights.”

According to the State Department, “[t]he Declaration remains open to all governments or relevant authorities willing to commit and implement its vision and principles.”

What does all this mean for Musk, Twitter and the future of free speech online?

Social media analysts and experts expressed varying opinions and predictions as to what regulations such as the DSA may mean for the global operations of digital platforms such as Twitter — especially if Musk attempts to make good on his pledges to “restore free speech.”

It's Time to Follow the Science. Join our Campaign!

Vasilis Vasilopoulos, data protection officer with Greek public broadcaster ERT and a Ph.D. candidate in journalism and mass media studies at Greece’s Aristotle University, told The Defender there are some positive elements to the DSA.

However, the boundaries of what is considered free speech should also be expanded, albeit within certain limits, he said.

Vasilopoulos added:

“The DSA is not the only means through which the problem of unethical [social media] algorithms with deceptive motives, or the unethical use of social media platforms, can be solved.

“[I]t is obvious that these platforms have surpassed the limits to democracy that we believed existed, and therefore, it is important that instead of imposing restrictions, we expand these boundaries, in favor of humanity and not capital or power.”

Matthew Spitzer, professor at Northwestern University’s Pritzker School of Law, said the EU’s proposals in particular may clash with Musk’s stated goals for Twitter, telling The Defender:

“[The DSA] may interfere with one of Elon Musk’s stated goals for buying Twitter. He seems to want less content moderation. But this regulation requires a lot of it.

“Second, this regulation dovetails with Musk’s stated desire for increased transparency. He had promised more transparency.”

Spitzer added his view that the DSA will likely increase the cost of operation for all social media companies, especially if they must also conform to domestic laws passed by various EU member states.

He added that U.S. tech companies may represent an easy target for European regulators, telling The Defender:

“[T]here will be conflicts between the USA and Europe … all of the target companies started in the USA. They are easy political targets in Europe.”

Referring specifically to Elon Musk and Twitter, Rectenwald said:

“If Musk is to have his way, the platform would no longer discriminate against content based on ‘wokeness,’ political beliefs, or the adherence to official state narratives and dictates.

“This could include the restoration of banned accounts on request by users and dramatic changes to Twitter’s discriminatory, leftist algorithms.”

According to Rectenwald, the EU’s regulations may “hamstring” Musk’s vision for Twitter and lead to a one-size-fits-all approach to content moderation, resulting in a “slippery slope” wherein “any information and opinion that differs from WHO-established official narratives regarding pandemics or other health-related crises” would be restricted.

Rectenwald said:

“Most likely, in order to meet the EU’s regulatory requirements and to streamline their efforts, VLOPs and VLOSEs will simply apply one set of rules to all online content.”

He also added that further pressures on platforms like Twitter may come not from EU regulators, but from the tech industry itself:

“[P]ressure to conform to ‘woke’ dictates will come from the Big Tech ‘woke’ cartel, including threats to remove the Twitter app from the Apple Store for failure to censor ‘hate speech,’ and the flight of ‘woke’ advertisers.

“Most likely, Musk’s purchase of Twitter will make no difference as free speech is further curtailed.”

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/online-disinformation-policies-world-governance-social-media/