"Published from The COVID Blog" Great Reset Accelerated: governments declaring red meat carcinogenic, encouraging humans to eat insects and eliminating private car ownership

GENEVA — We’ve all seen the creepy, dystopian video produced by the World Economic Forum (WEF). You’ll own nothing and be happy by 2030. You’ll eat much less meat, except for the “occasional treat” by 2030. A billion people will be displaced by climate change by 2030.

That’s the ideal world for plebs, according to the so-called “elite.” And the COVID-19 agenda has hastened the New World Order/Great Reset. Elon Musk, for instance, was worth $27 billion in 2019. He’s now worth $320 billion, according to Forbes. That’s a whopping 1,085% increase in wealth since the so-called pandemic commenced. Bill Gates owns 242,000 acres of U.S. farmland, making him the biggest private farmland owner in the country. Jeff Bezos’ net worth is now $201 billion, up from about $115 billion in 2019. And the list goes on.

Meanwhile, millions of Americans lost their small businesses and livelihoods in that same time period. Millions more are now forced into experimental injections, masks, and passports if they wish to participate in this Great Reset Society. Many of the foregoing WEF goals sound far-fetched and even crazy. But most of it is happening right now and will only accelerate as the weeks and months pass.

E.U. food policy: red meat causes cancer

This is the first step in eliminating meat altogether from Western diets and dictating what you can and cannot eat. The European Union Commission earmarked upwards of €186 million to promote the concept of red meat causing cancer, and thus recommends plant-based diets. Note that red meat to the EU includes beef, pork, goat and lamb. But this initiative is not limited to Europe.

The so-called European Green Deal includes initiatives to also coerce Canada, Mexico, South Korea, Japan and other countries into giving up meat in favor of frankenfoods, which the EU calls agri-foods. There are already companies making lab-grown meat in both Europe and the United States. The EU says this initiative will also mitigate climate change and promote healthy eating habits, which implies that they actually care about human health.

The Centers for Disease Control found last March that 78% of Americans hospitalized with COVID-19 were overweight or obese. But Western governments have said nothing about diet and exercise for preventing COVID-19 and improving health. “Vaccines” are the only way, according to Western governments. The Irish Cattle and Sheep Farmers Association called the EU’s policy, “willful misrepresentation of the actual research.”

You want meat? Eat bugs and maggots

There’s been a noticeable uptick in mainstream media stories referring to insects as “protein” and normalizing consumption thereof. Here are a few quotes from an Oregon Live article published on December 14:

“Bloomberg Businessweek reports that major food producers in Europe and the U.S. believe consumers eventually will be willing to eat crickets, beetles, mealworms and fruit-fly larvae, the latter being better known as maggots. This especially will be the case among younger people concerned about the state of the environment. Mealworms are clean, odorless and rich in minerals and vitamins, while maggots don’t really taste like anything.”

The Food Policy Center at Hunter College in New York City published an article on November 26 entitled, “Edible Insects: Why Aren’t We Eating More Bugs?” Perhaps the most disturbing quote from the article is as follows:

Using insects as food also shows potential as a way to improve global food security and malnutrition problems, especially in developing countries. Many insect species are densely packed with important vitamins, fats, and proteins; queen termites, for example, are given to undernourished children in some African countries because of their nutritional density.

Supply chain issues and food shortages are worsening by the day. Thus it makes sense that mainstream media have launched their eat bugs and cancerous meat campaigns simultaneously.

U.K. first to outlaw vehicle ownership?

Trudy Harrison MP is the Parliamentary junior transportation minister. She was a keynote speaker at the Collaborative Mobility Conference last month. Among many other things, she called vehicle ownership, “outdated 20th century thinking.” She advocated for the U.K. to eliminate vehicle ownership altogether and move to a “shared mobility” model. They’ll persuade and coerce the masses into cooperation using the same methods they used to dupe people into self-poisoning.

“Changing the way people consider car ownership and dependency will take time. Many things seem far fetched until they aren’t and I believe the same is true for shared mobility.”

The video below skips right to her speech.

Dystopia by any means necessary

The jobs of mainstream media are normalizing obedience and eliminating the potential for the “bandwagon effect.” The latter could grind all their agendas to a halt. Granted it’s safe to say that at least half of the world’s general population are vaxx zealots. But mainstream media make certain to never acknowledge the mass protests going on around the world, since seeing the large crowds may influence others to join in.

Austria, for instance, had some of the biggest protests the country has ever experienced last month. But mainstream media completely ignored it.

The powers-that-be are not even pretending that government institutions, including mainstream media, are legitimate anymore. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayer led that clown show last week. She spewed flat-out lies and pro-pharma propaganda instead of weighing real evidence in the most important court case of the 21st century.

Justices Elena Kagan and Stephen Breyer also told several whoppers in what is supposed to be one of the most respected institutions in the United States. These three had their minds made up to uphold Biden’s vaccine mandates before one word was spoken at oral arguments. They have lifetime appointments and are essentially above the law. And there’s nothing we can do about it except sign a petition.

Eat bugs? Own nothing? Like MP Harrison said, “Many things seem far fetched until they aren’t” (i.e. mass injections). Don’t let your guard down anytime soon. Stay vigilant and protect your friends and loved ones.

https://thecovidblog.com/2022/01/10/great-reset-accelerated-governments-declaring-red-meat-carcinogenic-encouraging-humans-to-eat-insects-and-eliminating-private-car-ownership/

"Published from The COVID Blog" Carlos Tejada: 49-year-old Wall Street Journal and New York Times writer posts booster shot photo on Instagram, dead hours later

SEOUL, SOUTH KOREA — A 49-year-old international reporter is dead, in a cut-and-dried story that spotlights mainstream media loyalty to big pharma.

Mr. Carlos Tejada was the deputy Asia editor for the New York Times. He worked for the Wall Street Journal as China news editor prior to that. In other words he was firmly entrenched as a mainstream media voice. Unfortunately that also means he was beholden to Pfizer, Moderna, masks, etc. It looks like that loyalty cost him his life.

As an international reporter who frequently traveled, Mr. Tejada had to choose between quitting his job or receiving experimental mRNA or viral vector DNA injections. He chose the latter. Mr. Tejada posted an Instagram photo on July 5 holding a vaccine card while someone injected him. He captioned the photo with a bunch of mainstream media regurgitated talking points. But the entire post is summed up here:

“And our privilege gives us access to vaccines, like the J&J jab Nora and I got just this morning. I’m thankful for the scientists and the medical professionals who defended us against Covid, and for being able to protect my family.”

He and his wife received the formerly “one and done” Johnson & Johnson viral vector DNA injection that day in Wichita, Kansas. Mr. Tejada apparently suffered no immediate adverse effects from the injection, or he simply did not publicly talk about it. And then came the booster.

Very sudden death and aftermath

Mr. Tejada posted his final Instagram update on December 17. He received a Moderna mRNA injection for his booster shot, mixing it with the J&J adenovirus vector. Granted all of the injections are equally lethal. But we’re slowly collecting data that show very unfavorable outcomes when you mix brands.

Mr. Tejada captioned the photo with a quip about Omicron. His booster injection also continued a very disturbing global trend. He received the injection at Myeongdong (Catholic) Cathedral in Seoul.

RELATED: Matthew 6:24 – thousands of U.S. Christian churches are serving the wrong god by facilitating mRNA and viral vector DNA injections (December 14, 2021)

 In perhaps the ultimate vaxx loyalty act, Mr. Tejada filled out paperwork that he couldn’t even read since it was written in Korean.

Mr. Tejada’s wife, Nora, logged into his Twitter account at 12:58 a.m. on December 18. “Carlos passed away last night of a heart attack,” she wrote. He died just hours after the injection.

The New York Times, Mr. Tejada’s former employer, wrote about his death on December 22. Of course said story completely omitted the fact that Mr. Tejada had a heart attack and died just hours after the Moderna “booster” injection. It was a golden opportunity for a real journalist at the newspaper to write about the undeniable cardiac issues associated with mRNA injections after losing one of their own. But the New York Times and all other mainstream media might as well admit that they are owned and operated by Pfizer, Moderna, et al.

RELATED: Revelation 2021? High-profile soccer figures, players (“footballers”) forcing conversation after three more soccer players collapse in three days (November 27, 2021)

 Mr. Tejada did his fair share of free advertising for big pharma and the overall dystopian COVID-19 agenda in the course of his work duties.

A GoFundMe page for Mr. Tejada’s family has already reached its $200,000 goal in four days. It is the largest GoFundMe we’ve covered on this blog in a year. Since Mr. Tejada was a journalist who failed in his duties to tell truth, and the GoFundMe has already reached its goal, we won’t be linking it here.

Mr. Tejada is survived by his wife and two children.

Boosters kill faster?

When 2021 commenced, this blogger literally took screenshots of people’s “I got my first shot,” “second dose completed,” etc. posts on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. Every few days, we’d follow-up. There were far more deaths and maiming than we had the resources to cover. That same trend is happening now with boosters.

There are literally thousands of “I got my booster” posts on Twitter and Instagram every day, with many recipients expressing immediate buyer’s remorse.

We’ve now covered five booster shot deaths. Granted that is a very low sample size, and the average age of the victims is around 55. But the average length of time from booster injection to death is eight days when Mr. Tejada is included.

Meanwhile all those California college students who received two injections just to attend school this past fall are now stuck in an endless cycle of experimental injections. Both the California State University and University of California systems announced booster mandates for faculty and students returning for the spring 2022 semester. The schools are using the Omicron narrative to justify the mandates. Several of said schools are also starting the spring semester remotely, completely defeating the purpose of the first two injections all students and staff received.

This blogger predicts that by the end of 2022, booster shot #5 will be the norm. And the billions of people worldwide who played along with this COVID-19 dystopian agenda essentially have no choice but to continue receiving the shots. Congratulations to everyone who has stood their ground and remain a pure human being. It’s simply foolish to give in now and enter the injection matrix. If you’ve made it this far, then you’re doing something right.

Stay vigilant and protect your friends and loved ones.

https://thecovidblog.com/2021/12/25/carlos-tejada-49-year-old-wall-street-journal-and-new-york-times-writer-posts-booster-shot-photo-on-instagram-dead-hours-later/

"Published from The COVID Blog" Thomas Senzee: longtime LGBT journalist mocks the non-vaccinated with the regurgitated “faster download speeds” trope, dies unexpectedly

PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA — A 54-year-old freelance journalist is dead, joining an ever-growing list of LGBT vaxx virtue signalers.

Mr. Thomas Senzee, aka Thom Senzee, worked as a journalist and freelance writer for over 20 years, according to his Huffington Post bio. Nearly all Senzee stories and online bios mention something about “LGBT.” Mr. Senzee announced in December 2020 that he would be rolling up his sleeves for the experimental injections as soon as possible. He reasoned that receiving the injections is “logic[al],” despite no long or even credible short-term studies about safety and effectiveness.

His first Pfizer mRNA injection came sometime in March 2021. Mr. Senzee was so excited about the second injection that he announced it twice before receiving the shot on April 23, 2021. He captioned the band-aid photo, saying he “can’t wait for faster download speeds.”

Vaxx zealotry continues

Mr. Senzee utilized a lot of word salads to appear enlightened and non-judgmental against the non-vaccinated. But the strategy was ineffective. He said in late October that wearing masks is “our responsibility” and then compared experimental mRNA gene therapy to measles and mumps vaccines from the 1970s.

British singer Eric Clapton had severe adverse reactions to an AstraZeneca viral vector DNA injection last May. He starting warning others about the risks and what he experienced after the shot. Mr. Senzee referred to Mr. Clapton as “#coocooClapton” and an “anti-vaxxer nut” for telling the truth about his adverse reactions.

Mr. Senzee then denied thriving on schadenfreude, while saying the non-vaccinated need to “heal…mentally.”

He then insinuated that “my body, my choice” only refers to abortions, and not the experimental injections and masks.

Another pattern we’ve seen in nearly all of these LGBT virtue signaling cases is unabashed, universal Fauci worship and obedience.

Of course Fauci is responsible for upwards of 300,000 homosexual American deaths with his promotion of and profiteering off the poisonous HIV drug AZT in the 1990s.

Finally, right before the New Year, on December 27, Mr. Senzee blamed the non-vaccinated for his obsequiousness and obedience to government, mainstream media and big tech.

Sudden death

It’s unclear if or when Mr. Senzee received a booster shot. However, we’ve cited surveys by the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) Foundation several times on this blog.

The HRC, known as the “largest LGBT rights organization in the United States,” found last August that 92% of American adults that identify as LGBT were fully-vaccinated. HRC updated its data and released a new report on March 24. It found that 96% of LGBT American adults have either already received a booster shot, had a booster appointment set, or planned to set an appointment in the very-near future. Thus it’s safe to surmise Mr. Senzee was triple-vaxxed.

The Blade reported that Mr. Senzee was found dead in Palm Springs on March 24. Another LGBT publication described his death as “tragic and unexpected.” Note that Mr. Senzee averaged about five tweets per day from January 2021-22. That dropped to about one per day in February. He tweeted only twice in March, with the last one coming on March 16.

The Riverside County Coroner said in a statement that the cause of death is undetermined, pending further investigation. There was a GoFundMe page created on March 30 with a goal of raising $6,700. The beneficiary was listed as Barbara Senzee, who appears to be Mr. Senzee’s sister. But the page, with only half of its goal met, now says it is no longer accepting donations.

There are no further updates as of publishing.

Strengthening a sad pattern

The LGBT virtue signaling, post-injection death phenomenon commenced with “Jason the Bartender.” Thereafter, the LGBT bodybuilder, the LGBT former Florida congressional candidate, the 70-year-old LGBT painter, the actor who played an LGBT character, etc. joined these ranks. All of them said vile, nasty things about the non-vaccinated and/or any so-called COVID-19 treatments that didn’t come from a syringe.

It’d be completely disingenuous and dishonest from a journalistic perspective to avoid the fact that 2022 homosexual culture includes vaxx zealotry and Fauci worship as prerequisites. We also must point out the fact that LGBT culture demands that its supporters and adherents live and accept fantasies, lies and degradation of women, with the latter glorified as virtuous. Those who say or do anything even slightly against the LGBT gospel are exiled from the church, if you will. Cynthia Nixon is the perfect example.

RELATED: Ian Matos: 32-year-old LGBT Olympic diver dead 19 weeks after COVID-19 “vaccine,” likely antibody dependent enhancement (December 25, 2021)

 The former Sex In The City star said in 2012 that she is bisexual, and “for me, it is a choice. I understand that for many people it’s not, but for me it’s a choice, and you don’t get to define my gayness for me.” She later backtracked after the cancel culture mob attacked because LGBT gospel is that you’re born that way. Ms. Nixon, an LGBT white woman who is married to another woman, ran for governor of ultra-liberal New York against Andrew Cuomo in 2018. But somehow she was thoroughly defeated in the primary. Some blamed her loss on not being lesbian enough.

Born gay, men are really women, “gay penguins” and now mRNA and viral vector DNA injections. This is LGBT gospel – the primary tenets of their religion, with Fauci playing the role as son of god Bill Gates, who is also loved by said community. It is what it is.

Stay vigilant and protect your friends and loved ones.

https://thecovidblog.com/2022/04/11/thomas-senzee-longtime-lgbt-journalist-mocks-the-non-vaccinated-with-the-regurgitated-faster-download-speeds-trope-dies-unexpectedly/

On the heels of rail carriers canceling grain shipments, CF Industries warns that FERTILIZER rail shipments are now being halted during spring planting Saturday, April 16, 2022 by: Mike Adams

(Natural News) As you may recall, ten days ago I warned that rail carriers were declaring “force majeure” and halting shipments of grain to dairy herds and other cow herds across America. In that announcement, I also warned that this was an engineered collapse of the food supply, where rail carriers were essentially being ordered to drop certain loads in order to maximize the coming wave of food scarcity and famine.

Now, devastating news from CF Industries — one of the largest fertilizer producers in the world — confirms the engineered food collapse plan is being expanded to include fertilizer shipments.

According to an April 14th announcement from CF Industries, Union Pacific is halting the delivery of fertilizer shipments right in the middle of peak planting season for farmers. CF Industries warns that, “railroad-mandated shipping reductions [will] result in nitrogen fertilizer shipment delays during the spring application season and that it [will] be unable to accept new rail sales involving Union Pacific for the foreseeable future.”

Even more alarmingly, CF Industries warns that, “it is one of only 30 companies to face these restrictions.”

This means that Union Pacific is essentially dropping fertilizer shipments and grain shipments all across America. Put another way, America’s food infrastructure is being deliberately shut down.

The implications of this are nothing short of catastrophic. It affects not just fertilizer but also DEF (Diesel Exhaust Fluid) which is necessary for all tractors, transportation trucks, construction equipment and other machinery that use diesel engines. As CF Industries explains:

CF Industries ships to customers via Union Pacific rail lines primarily from its Donaldsonville Complex in Louisiana and its Port Neal Complex in Iowa. The rail lines serve key agricultural areas such as Iowa, Illinois, Kansas, Nebraska, Texas and California. Products that will be affected include nitrogen fertilizers such as urea and urea ammonium nitrate (UAN) as well as diesel exhaust fluid (DEF), an emissions control product required for diesel trucks. CF Industries is the largest producer of urea, UAN and DEF in North America, and its Donaldsonville Complex is the largest single production facility for the products in North America.

Without DEF, you can’t run tractors. And to the “Green New Deal” lunatics who think that halting all diesel engines will magically make the world green (while they absurdly try to suck all the CO2 out of the atmosphere, which will kill all plants, by the way), you’re about to experience the starvation, chaos and violence that comes from shutting down agriculture. Good luck to all.

Spring crops will FAIL across North America if they don’t get nitrogen

This engineered halting of fertilizer shipments appears to be timed to severely disrupt spring planting across North America. This is consistent with what we have all observed with Joe Biden’s deliberate shutdown of America’s energy infrastructure which began on day one of Biden’s fake “presidency” when he signed a stack of executive orders shutting down energy pipelines.

From that very first day, Joe Biden and his handlers (Obama) have been meticulously deconstructing America’s food and energy infrastructure, causing shortages and price inflation. Yet as prices and scarcity both continue to worsen, Jen Psaki says it’s all “Putin’s fault” as a convenient cover story.

The truth is that fake president Joe Biden is trying to plunge America into mass starvation, food riots and chaos. The shutting down of energy, food and fertilizer transportation is just one small part of this nefarious plan.

CF Industries president Tony Will reveals how fertilizer is being selectively targeted:

“The timing of this action by Union Pacific could not come at a worse time for farmers,” said Tony Will, president and chief executive officer, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. “Not only will fertilizer be delayed by these shipping restrictions, but additional fertilizer needed to complete spring applications may be unable to reach farmers at all. By placing this arbitrary restriction on just a handful of shippers, Union Pacific is jeopardizing farmers’ harvests and increasing the cost of food for consumers.”

In the understatement of the year, CF Industries also points out that without nitrogen fertilizer, crop yields “will be lower,” saying:

The application of nitrogen fertilizer is critical to maximizing crop yields. If farmers are unable to secure all the nitrogen fertilizer that they require in the current season because of supply chain disruptions such as rail shipping restrictions, the Company expects yield will be lower. This will likely extend the timeline to replenish global grains stocks.

In truth, without nitrogen fertilizer, crop yields will be nothing short of catastrophic.

Perhaps that’s why China has been buying up all the grain supplies around the world, stockpiling like mad in anticipation of a global food collapse that’s being engineered.

A perfect storm of black swan events spell FOOD DOOM on a global scale

If 2020 – 2021 was the “covid” chapter of global collapse, 2022 – 2023 is going to be the “famine” chapter. A convergence of black swan events is spelling out the absolute certainty of global food scarcity and mass famine. Some of those events include:

  • The unleashing of economic sanctions against Russia, halting Russia’s ability to export fertilizer and food crops such as wheat.

  • The Grand Solar Minimum sun cycle is producing lower levels of solar radiation that will reach the surface of the Earth for the next several years, leading to global crop failures (and, historically, the fall of nations and empires).

  • Unbounded money printing by the Federal Reserve, leading to rapid devaluation / collapse of the value of the dollar vs. food.

  • Skyrocketing food inflation, which the UN’s FAO now puts at 12.6% month over month, means food prices will double every six months at this rate of inflation.

  • US government programs that are paying farmers to destroy crops, deliberately contributing to food scarcity.

  • Skyrocketing diesel fuel prices, which raise the cost of inputs for farming because farms run on diesel equipment. Transportation of crops is also carried out by diesel trucks.

  • Climate change lunatics are trying to remove CO2 from the atmosphere, which will starve food crops and devastate global yields, since CO2 is the key nutrient that plants need to grow (even more than they need nitrogen).

The upshot of all this is abundantly clear:

  • Accelerating food inflation. Food prices will, without question, double by the end of 2022 and may actually go much higher. Food prices will almost certainly double again in 2023.

  • As food prices skyrocket, food riots will break out worldwide. This has already begun in Sri Lanka, Peru and other nations, and it will only spread globally.

  • Later in 2022, food riots will break out in the USA, first appearing in democrat-run “blue” cities and then spreading.

  • In 2023, we are certain to see food rationing and price controls both demanded and enforced by governments around the world, including the US government.

  • Widespread food insecurity will lead to global uprisings and revolutions. Nations will fall. Sri Lanka is already in default on its dollar bonds and facing the toppling of its political leadership, and we’re not even out of April yet.

  • In response to the rising chaos, governments will declare national emergencies and roll out police state controls to try to control the masses. China’s brutal lockdown of 25+ million people in Shanghai is an early preview of things to come on a global scale.

Most importantly, people who do not have alternative sources of food will likely starve. This means you either need to store food or learn how to grow food. Ideally, you’ll have capabilities in both categories. This is what’s going to keep you alive.

I understand there are some people who, when faced with this bad news, resort to saying things like, “I can’t handle any more bad news. I choose to pretend that the food supply will be fine.” To those people, I would beg you to reconsider your stance, because you can’t pretend to be not starving when you are starving. The food scarcity will shock people back to reality if they’ve been living in a delusional dream world. (There’s no such thing as transstarvationism, just like there’s no such thing as transgenderism. You can’t actually change your gender, and you can’t actually live without eating.)

Anyone who chooses to ignore this engineered food collapse will likely starve.

Some interviews and podcasts you need to hear

For starters, listen to my recent interview with Ben Davidson, an expert on space weather who warns about the effects of solar cycles on crops:

Brighteon.com/2f952e89-f601-4a11-91a8-b6918a36c0a4

David DuByne’s interview was also extremely informative, where he covered the effects of the Grand Solar Minimum on crop yields, warning about famine cycles throughout history:

Brighteon.com/a18d3842-af07-433c-b9ba-676fbc25c13d

I don’t have a recent interview with him, but the Ice Age Farmer is also offering excellent analysis of the food scarcity situation. In an interview from last year, he warned that “engineered food scarcity” was being implemented to starve the world:

Brighteon.com/24070697-39f7-464d-81e7-cec49f4a89e6

Here’s an important video from David DuByne (ADAPT 2020) from yesterday:

Brighteon.com/b6574c8d-0cf7-4436-a515-d2ef12d6c912

Here’s my “planned starvation” podcast warning from April 6th, which explains what’s happening with grain deliveries being halted by rail carriers:

Brighteon.com/7f8eb763-14a0-4684-b2d9-74c6f3a068e0

On April 4th, I also warned about food hyperinflation and the food riots that are already spreading around the world:

Brighteon.com/b79d0300-1637-4e4e-aefb-9160d072929b

If you want to learn how to grow a lot of food in a small amount of space, learn from Marjory Wildcraft: ICanGrowFood.com

Here’s my latest interview with Marjory:

Brighteon.com/e94ea934-d54c-4d8e-aedd-9fedc25c273a

I also expect to be posting a podcast update this weekend, covering the halting of fertilizer deliveries via rail. Watch for that on my channel on Brighteon.com:

https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport

Global INTOXICATION explains the FALL of humanity Monday, April 18, 2022 by: Mike Adams

(Natural News) Humanity is intoxicated to the point of suicidal collapse.

Note the word root “toxic” found in the word “intoxicated.” It doesn’t just refer to consuming alcohol, but to a long list of behaviors, substances and desires that turn off rational thought and thrust people into bad decision making.

Here’s a short list of intoxication vectors affecting humanity right now:

  • Money (blinds people to rationality)

  • Medications (especially psychotropic drugs)

  • Social media (begging for likes)

  • Cult acceptance (LGBT cults, etc.)

  • Sex (addition, power, perversion)

  • Water supply (fluoride, other toxins)

  • Electropollution (5G, wifi, broadcast signals)

  • Air (aerosolized toxins, chemtrails)

  • Food (pesticides, GMOs)

  • Alcohol (addiction)

  • Recreational drugs (addiction, dumbing down)

  • Television (opiate of the masses)

  • Technology (blind worship of tech as your god)

  • Power over others (the power to control people)

Most of humanity is preoccupied with these intoxicating substances, dynamics and powers, rendering them unable to process the reality of the world around them. As a result, they are not preparing for the global food scarcity and debt bomb collapse that are both being engineered.

Mass intoxication is also accomplished through the catapulting of lies by the corporate media. In essence, this is a kind of sorcery that makes people believe they are seeing things that don’t exist. For example, the entire corporate media ran with the covid-19 psychological terrorism campaign, convincing people to mask their children, shut down their businesses and be afraid to go outside (for nearly two years in some cases).

That’s the power of spellcasting and sorcery by the corporate media. Such spells can be incredibly intoxicating to people who are desperate to conform, as they will reject reality but accept delusions as long as those delusions are popular (and socially approved).

Human civilization as we know it will FALL

There is no escaping the ramifications of this global intoxication. Human civilization as we know it has become dysfunctional, mentally ill and self-destructive far beyond the point of no return. Now, we are witnessing the collapse unfold each day, only able to watch in horror as once-civil society breaks down into lawlessness, left-wing pedophilia, corporate-funded child grooming (Disney), rigged elections, weaponized depopulation “vaccines,” unbounded money printing, food scarcity, inflation and civil unrest.

The end point of where this is headed is not in question: Global uprisings, civil unrest, violence, revolutions and the fall of nations. Global depopulation is already under way and will accelerate rapidly. Those who are living in delusional fantasy land rather than preparing for reality will be very unlikely to survive the chaos that’s coming.

In order to adapt, we must maintain our presence of mind… and that means eliminating exposure to toxins

As I explain in today’s podcast, we must eliminate our exposure to toxins in order to maintain the presence of mind that will get us through these unprecedented — Biblical — times.

Fortunately, we have that choice. We can choose to stop consuming tap water, pesticide-sprayed foods or toxic medications. We can turn off the TV, stop watching toxic CNN and move away from the worship of materialism or technology. (And don’t get sucked into a virtual reality artificial world, either.)

We can all make choices to clean up our minds and our bodies, leading to greater clarity and more rational decision making that automatically improves sustainability and survivability.

Make no mistake, however: We will still be surrounded by intoxicated lunatics who are only capable of acting with a sense of destruction and madness. Thus, we must take every effort to physically distance ourselves from their “zombie hubs” (i.e. Democrat-controlled cities) so that we do not find ourselves overrun by their expanding arcs of destruction.

In a post-collapse scenario, the lunatic, unprepared masses will turn into raging, violent zombies, and they will rampage across cities and suburbs like locusts, pillaging everything in sight and leaving behind a swath of death and destruction.

To survive the collapse, be sure to check out my upcoming free book, Resilient Prepping. It will be released soon, and it’s a free download of all the audio files and a printable PDF transcript.

Get more details on how to survive all this in today’s Situation Update podcast:

Brighteon.com/bdb32e30-249c-4b04-bfa4-a909155a6bab

How Dangerous Are Masks for Children? BY PAUL E. ALEXANDER

Our public health agencies such as the CDC and NIH, and television medical experts seem unable to address key health messages that could have a dramatic effect in reducing risk of severe sequelae in higher-risk populations such as the minority and African-American population to the scourge of SARS-CoV-2.

These agencies and media echo chambers squandered many opportunities to inform the public on simple yet very effective messaging (vitamin D supplementation, obesity control, early treatment etc.) that could have reduced morbidity and saved lives. They continue to. Not just for Covid-19, but for many other illnesses.

For example, obesity emerged as a potent super-loaded risk factor behind age in the harmful sequelae and a human target for SARS-CoV-2 in most studies, in addition to being elderly, frail and having comorbid conditions. Being younger with comorbid conditions also placed one at risk.

We knew this data very early on, maybe one month post-March 2020 yet the CDC etc. failed to either read the data, understand the data, or act on the data. It would have behooved our agencies to have addressed these risks in large-scale education programs for the populace and especially by calling for a reduction in body weight and particularly for the minority sub-groups (African-Americans).

In a similar light, studies showed that vitamin D supplementation for African-Americans has been associated with a lowered risk of severe disease and mortality from SARS-CoV-2. So the evidence was there; just the action by health agencies was absent.

Early ambulatory outpatient treatment with successful combination and sequenced antiviral agents, corticosteroids, and anti-clotting therapeutics should be used (and should have been used) widely to help the people at risk. The African-American community is aware that “Covid (is) a killer for the obese: like pouring gasoline on top of a fire.”

Unfortunately, more than two years into the pandemic, the manifest issue of public health education and sound policy decisions remain absent and aloof, given the erratic and confusing responses from the health and governing officials.

Now we face another looming concern: the potential danger of the chlorine, polyester, and microplastic components of the face masks (surgical principally but any of the mass-produced masks) that have become part of our daily lives due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

Emergent reports, albeit nascent and anecdotal but nevertheless vitally important (and will be clarified and defined in time) regarding the manufacture of masks, where, “many of them (face masks) are made of polyester, so you have a microplastic problem…many of the face masks would contain polyester with chlorine compounds…if I have the mask in front of my face, then of course I inhale the microplastic directly and these substances are much more toxic than if you swallow them, as they get directly into the nervous system.”

A very recent 2022 British publication (Jenner et al. Detection of microplastics in human lung tissue using μFTIR spectroscopy) focused on polypropylene that is a component of the face masks and reported that such “microplastics were identified in all regions of the human lungs using μFTIR analysis.” Furthermore, “polypropylene and polyethylene terephthalate fibres were the most abundant.” Researchers concluded that inhalation was “a route of MP exposure.” And that this study “is the first to report MPs within human lung tissue samples, using μFTIR spectroscopy.”

There were also early reports of toxic mold, fungi, and bacteria that can pose a significant threat to the immune system by potentially weakening it. Of particular concern to us is the recent report of breathing in synthetic fibers in the face masks. This is of serious concern.

“Loose particulate was seen on each type of mask. Also, tight and loose fibers were seen on each type of mask. If every foreign particle and every fiber in every facemask is always secure and not detachable by airflow, then there should be no risk of inhalation of such particles and fibers. However, if even a small portion of mask fibers is detachable by inspiratory airflow, or if there is debris in mask manufacture or packaging or handling, then there is the possibility of not only entry of foreign material to the airways, but also entry to deep lung tissue, and potential pathological consequences of foreign bodies in the lungs.”

Reports are that “Graphene is a strong, very thin material that is used in fabrication, but it can be harmful to lungs when inhaled and can cause long-term health problems.”

There is a risk of potential inflammatory/fibrotic lung diseases because we are inhaling these materials in the masks now for two years with more duration to come and no end in sight. These substances might also be highly carcinogenic. Not just for us as adults but we must be very concerned about the risks especially to our children since they depend on us as mentors and guides for their decision-making.

These blue surgical masks pervade our lives. They remain ubiquitous. “Health Canada issued a warning about blue and gray disposable face masks, which contain an asbestos-like substance associated with “early pulmonary toxicity.” The warning is specific to potentially toxic masks distributed within schools and daycares across Quebec. Health Canada (and full praise to them)….“discovered during a preliminary risk assessment that the masks contain microscopic graphene particles that, when inhaled, could cause severe lung damage.”

Reports are and were that “for a while now, some daycare educators had expressed suspicion about the masks, which were causing children to feel as though they were swallowing cat hair while wearing them. We now know that instead of cat hair, children were inhaling the equivalent of asbestos all day long.”It appears to be a substance known as graphene.

What is indeed alarming is that “the SNN200642 masks that were being used all across Canada in school classrooms had never been tested for safety or effectiveness.” This is indeed a catastrophic failure by the regulators as these surgical face masks are linked to early pulmonary toxicity.

What is indeed frightening is that all of these blue and similar surgical face masks cause plastic fiber inhalation and the outcomes could be devastating, especially to our children. Yet it has pervaded and persons making Covid policy decisions do not seem to care about the harmful implications. These face mask plastics will degrade very slowly over time and as such, in the lungs it may remain and just build up to dangerous levels.

We do not even know what is an ‘acceptable’ level, for there should be none. There is debate that the immune system can attack such foreign objects, thus driving prolonged inflammation which may lead to diseases such as cancer. And reused masks which pervade our daily lives, and based on our personal experiences, do produce more loosened fibers.

Dr. Richard Urso showed us just how dangerous these are by putting them under a microscope, revealing the melt-blown polypropylene plastic. Some masks even contain fiberglass and this is very dangerous as we know to inhale. We as parents make these decisions; we have to step back and question many of these decisions we are making that seem suboptimal. If it does not seem right, then you have to push back and question and demand the science, demand the data from these seemingly untethered experts.

We certainly did not get (across the last two years) and are not presently getting the due diligence and protection from public health experts, the relevant health agencies, and policy makers that we need.

Moreover, the mass media seems incapable of doing the investigative type of journalism to fully inform the populace on what the public needs to know. We close by reiterating the warning in the JAMA publication that “Face masks should not be worn by healthy individuals to protect themselves from acquiring respiratory infection because there is no evidence to suggest that face masks worn by healthy individuals are effective in preventing people from becoming ill.”

Every act has a consequence, and there is always risk. It is therefore imperative to weigh the consequences before embarking on a specific course of action. These are risk management decisions especially for parents and not because a Dr. Fauci type tells you to do something means that it is accurate or necessary. Just consider the nonsense we heard about double masking where he said use them one day only to then retract on another day.

Children come with a potent innate immune system that works tremendously well. At the same time and similarly, their immune systems are still being developed, and we have forced lockdowns, school closures, and masking on a developing child. We have no prior experience on the subsequent outcomes pertaining to children’s development, health, and well-being.

We may be faced with catastrophic consequences of what we did to our children over the last two years of unsound Covid restrictive policies, and allowed government technocrats to force these upon them. These are matters too important to nonchalantly disregard.

Republished from Brownstone Institute

Was Ivermectin Unfairly Torpedoed as Treatment for COVID-19? Medication has become the poster child for conflicted scientific, regulatory issues that surround COVID-19 BY JENNIFER MARGULIS

Controversy seems to surround virtually everything connected with COVID-19: masking, social distancing, vaccines. Amid this quagmire of controversy, one of the most fraught questions has been whether the medication ivermectin is nothing more than dangerous snake oil or is actually a safe and effective treatment for the virus.

‘Horse De-Wormer’

The mainstream media and conventional medical doctors have generally derided ivermectin, referring to it as a “horse de-wormer.” Patients are cautioned against taking it, doctors who are willing to prescribe it report being investigated by their licensing boards and even fired from their jobs. Patients are warned that ivermectin is “dangerous” and “ineffective.”

According to the FDA, it “has not authorized or approved ivermectin for the treatment or prevention of COVID-19 in people or animals. Ivermectin has not been shown to be safe or effective for these indications.”

Safe Antiparasitic

At the same time, ivermectin is a well-known antiparasitic that hundreds of millions of people, mostly in Africa and Asia, have taken since it first became available in 1981, according to research published in the Proceedings of the Japan Academy. It has been especially effective at combating a disease called river blindness, which is caused by Onchocerca volvulus worms and transmitted via blackfly bites.

In fact, ivermectin is considered so safe that it’s sold over-the-counter in many countries, or even distributed free. The two scientists who developed the drug, Drs. William C. Campbell and Satoshi Omura, shared the 2015 Nobel Prize in Medicine with another scientist who developed an effective way to fight malaria.

When the COVID pandemic was raging, scientists naturally sought drugs that could be repurposed to fight the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Ivermectin made the list of potential treatments because it exhibited antiviral capabilities, and some doctors in developing countries had noticed that patients on preventative ivermectin for parasites fared better with COVID.

Positive In-Vitro Results

One particularly promising study, published by a team of researchers in Australia in June of 2020, found that a single dose of ivermectin was able to reduce replication of SARS-Co-V-2 by 5,000-fold in vitro (that is, in test-tube experiments).

However, it was initially thought that very high doses would be required for the drug to be effective against viral infection in humans.

Yet small clinical trials began reporting surprisingly good results. Indeed, some of these early trials reported effective treatment for both mild cases of COVID-19 and more severe, hospitalized patients. It seemed that the drug’s anti-inflammatory effects might be more important than its antiviral capacities when it came to treating people with COVID-19.

In an article dated May 1, 2021, award-winning journalist Michael Capuzzo reported that President Donald Trump was treated with ivermectin when he contracted COVID. (When I contacted him to confirm this information, Capuzzo wrote me back that he couldn’t reveal his source but that it was someone close to the president.)

When popular podcaster and comedian Joe Rogan tested positive for COVID in September of 2021, he threw “the kitchen sink” at it. Among other treatments, he took ivermectin, which he has since credited with helping him recover from the virus in just a couple of days.

A Controversial Cochrane Review

All the positive buzz about ivermectin abruptly ended, however, with a Cochrane review published in July 2021 that was categorically critical of the drug. Making headlines around the world, the review concluded that, “Current evidence does not support using ivermectin for treating or preventing of COVID-19 unless they are part of well-designed randomized trials.”

A closer look at this research reveals, however, that the conclusion makes claims beyond the data amassed by the study itself. The language of the review studiously avoids any determination about ivermectin’s effects, repeating the words “We are uncertain whether” and underscoring the “uncertainty” that ivermectin can do what some of the trials argued it could do a whopping 38 times.

The Cochrane review was a meta-analysis: a study that combines and examines data from other studies to essentially act as one overarching study. The analysis included 14 randomized controlled trials with a total of only 1,678 participants. N = 1,678 is a very low number.

Despite that, several of the included studies indicated very good results from using ivermectin (including a reduction of all-cause mortality of 40 percent compared to that of the placebo group and a reduction of the need for invasive mechanical ventilation of 45 percent) to combat COVID-19.

The reviewers dismissed these promising results with the claim that they were “very low certainty” because of potential bias and that the number of participants, 185, in the trial was so low. It’s true that the results didn’t reach statistical significance, but that alone is not an adequate reason to discard the results.

Biased Unbiased Research?

Cochrane has long been considered the gold standard in international unbiased research. However, in recent years, their research has often been sponsored by entities with conflicts of interest.

In 2016, Cochrane received $1.15 million from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, prompting concerns among Cochrane’s board that taking the money would compromise Cochrane’s mission. The furor resulted in the firing of one board member and the resignation of four others, and many believe the Gates funding significantly affected the quality of Cochrane’s subsequent reviews, most notably of the safety and efficacy of the HPV vaccine.

In 2018 article, “Cochrane—A sinking ship?” published in the British Medical Journal, science reporter and a researcher Maryanne Demasi, Ph.D., lamented Cochrane’s shift towards a commercial business model approach and “away from its roots of independent, scientific analysis and open public debate.”

The ivermectin review was funded by the United Kingdom, but was carried out by members of the German research project CEOsys (COVID-19 Evidence-Ecosystem). Both are government entities that, like the U.S.’s Centers for Disease Control, have staked public health—and their credibility—on a vaccine solution.

What may be most important in the Cochrane review was what was left out. Their review didn’t include an analysis of at least 49 other studies that could shed light on this issue. According to the authors: “We identified 31 ongoing and 18 studies awaiting classification until publication of results or clarification of inconsistencies.”

At the same time, another meta-analysis, published four months earlier, in March of 2021, included 18 randomized controlled trials that showed very positive results for ivermectin intervention. But many of the studies were not yet published, and this meta-analysis included one retracted trial. However, the scientists address the difficulty of combining disparate study designs into something that can justify a cohesive conclusion, mentioning the fact that meta-analyses “are prone to confounding issues.”

Indeed, they are.

While it’s generally accepted that meta-analyses, such as Cochrane routinely performs, are the “gold standard” in data-driven research, many critics point out that they are actually quite easy to manipulate as well as prone to compounding the errors of the underlying studies.

In their 544-page book, “Introduction to Meta-Analysis,” statistician Michael Borenstein, Ph.D., and his team outline some of the more significant problems associated with meta-analyses:

“The goal of a meta-analysis should be to synthesize the effect sizes, and not simply (or necessarily) to report a summary effect,” they explained. “If the effects are consistent, then the analysis shows that the effect is robust across the range of included studies …. If there is substantial dispersion, then the focus should shift from the summary effect to the dispersion itself.”

The studies included in Cochrane’s meta-analysis were by no means consistent, yet that fact was largely ignored in the analysis when it should have been the main topic of discussion.

Clinician Views on Ivermectin

“I have treated hundreds of COVID patients successfully with Ivermectin as part of a larger treatment protocol,” wrote Jeffrey Barke, a medical doctor based in southern California, in an email. “I have not seen a single adverse reaction to ivermectin. It’s a safe drug. And when used early in the course of COVID-19, ivermectin … works.”

However, Barke continued, it is difficult to procure.

“Unfortunately, many brand-name pharmacies are refusing to dispense this safe, potentially life-saving medication. It’s easier for me to prescribe oxycontin than ivermectin,” he wrote.

Barke is not alone. Many doctors all over the world have anecdotally reported getting good results using ivermectin, especially when administered at the first signs of infection.

Getting accurate data on ivermectin’s efficacy (or lack thereof) is tricky, however, because many places where it is being used to seemingly good effect, including Mexico City (where nearly 200,000 kits with ivermectin were distributed) and Delhi, haven’t been running placebo-controlled trials.

According to Dr. Robert Malone, an internationally recognized physician and biochemist and one of the original inventors of mRNA vaccination technology, who has worked as a vaccine developer and government public health insider for more than 40 years, “prophylactic use of ivermectin saves lives.”

Analyzing data from a controlled study done in Brazil of over 223,000 people in an article on Substack, Malone concludes: “The results of this study clearly demonstrate that prophylactic use of ivermectin must be initiated immediately for people in high risk categories in the United States and worldwide.”

Confounding Factors

At the same time, results from two recent clinical trials, one in Malaysia and one in Italy, found that adding ivermectin to the normal course of therapy seemed to show no benefit and also no harm.

Yet another meta-analysis, just published on March 21 of 2022, examined studies done on ivermectin and COVID-19 to analyze why some showed that patients receiving ivermectin did better than controls, while other studies showed no benefit. According to these authors, the difference in how COVID-19 patients on ivermectin did varied depending on whether the patients lived in an area in which a certain type of worm was prevalent or not.

It may seem counterintuitive, but this study found that people in areas with widespread infection from nematode worms of the genus Strongyloides didn’t get as sick from COVID-19. Perhaps because their immune systems, busy fighting parasitic worms, did not overwhelm them with cytokine storms.

We don’t think of worm infections as beneficial. But this research dovetails with results of a recent study from Ethiopia published in the Lancet. Of the 751 patients who were infected with SARS-CoV-2, those who had intestinal parasites (either worms or protists) tended not to progress to severe disease. Eleven patients in this cohort died. But none of deaths occurred in people who had parasites.

Juan Chamie, senior data analyst for the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, a non-profit organization founded by medical doctors that is dedicated to developing effective treatment protocols to prevent the transmission of COVID-19 and to improve outcomes for sick patients, has been tracking the use of ivermectin to combat COVID across the globe since May of 2020.

Chamie has compiled all the data into a striking series of charts, published on the FLCCC website, that show that localities that introduced ivermectin as a part of their treatment protocols saw significant drops in their COVID rates, perhaps as a result. 

If Chamie’s analysis is correct—and that’s a very big if—the outright dismissal of a low-risk, inexpensive, potentially preventive treatment with a long record of safety could be the single most deadly, not to mention unethical, policy error of this pandemic.