HUGE news on vaccines breaking later today, Infant formula rationing begins, plus a preview of bombshells yet to come Monday, April 11, 2022 by: Mike Adams

(Natural News) In today’s Situation Update podcast (see bel0w), I give you a heads up about the Stew Peters documentary featuring bombshell new research from Dr. Brian Ardis. This is being released this evening, around 6 pm or 7 pm eastern time, via the StewPeters.TV website.

Immediately after that, Brighteon drops the first segment in a 3-part interview with Dr. Ardis, covering the same intel. You can find that tonight at:

https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport

Parts 2 and 3 will be posted on Tuesday and Wednesday.

Other indy media interviews with Dr. Ardis have also been completed and are going to start rolling out across free speech platforms over the next 48 hours. The corporate media’s so-called “fact checkers” will be relentlessly attempting to destroy this new information via rigged fact-checking, and then after that, a massive onslaught of new documentation and citation-backed articles is going to obliterate the fraudulent fact-checkers. This is how it’s all going to play out, as you’ll soon see.

There will also be an immediate effort to scrub the internet of hundreds of documents admitting to all this, but we’ve already saved off all the offline versions of these web pages, so they cannot be memory holed. Other researchers have done the same. All the files are already distributed across multiple journalists and investigators. There are no loose ends on this one. Signed, sealed, delivered.

What you’re about to learn from the Dr. Ardis bombshells (and the Stew Peters documentary coverage) is truly game-changing information. It will, for the first time, reveal what “covid” really is and how to treat covid vaccine injuries. It also reveals the underlying source for remdesivir and explains why that drug is causing so many deaths via widespread kidney damage.

You’re also going to learn why you should never consume city water again, nor should you eat or drink anything made from city water.

Infant formula rationing has begun as Walgreens limits purchases

Remember last week when I warned that rail shipments of grain supplies for dairy operations would lead to severe shortages of dairy products? Even before that wave has kicked in, Walgreens has begun limiting purchases on infant formula due to supply chain failures.

Covered by CBS News, the grocery statistics aggregator known as Datasembly is warning that 29% of baby formula products are out of stock:

“This is a shocking number that you don’t see for other categories.” – Ben Reich, CEO of Datasembly. “We’ve been tracking it over time and it’s going up dramatically. We see this category is being affected by economic conditions more dramatically than others…”

The dairy shortages have only just begun. It’s going to get far, far worse later this year. And with food prices now rising 12.6% month over month, food prices will double every six months as long as this trend continues.

Welcome to Joe Biden’s hyperinflation scenario. You’ll have plenty of time to ponder the evils of the Biden regime while you’re starving this coming Fall and Winter.

More bombshell intel on what’s happening in Ukraine

I received intel over the last 24 hours that I shared today on Brighteon.Social. Here’s the intel:

INTEL FLASH: In the next 2 weeks, you are going to see POW videos coming out of Russia, showing high-level American, French and NATO military officials who have been captured by Russia in Eastern Ukraine. These POWs will admit to running illegal interrogation and torture campaigns that they carried out with the Ukraine government. They will serve as proof that NATO was running a proxy war against Russia, using Ukraine as the staging ground. It will also show that NATO officials were tightly coordinated with actual Nazis who sought to carry out ethnic genocide against the Russian people via genetically-targeted bioweapons releases. Ultimately, the bioweapons funding will be traced back to the Biden family.

It is now fully confirmed that 100+ NATO military commanders and high-level officials are trapped and about to be taken prisoner. Rumor is that the entire ground game in Ukraine is being run by the United States and NATO, working on conjunction with the Azov Nazis (who are being obliterated).

The noose is tightening around the remaining Ukrainian forces (in the East) who are surrounded and completely out of supplies (food, water, ammo, etc.). They are going to be overrun and destroyed in the next few days. Ukraine has been ordered by the USA to sacrifice all these young lives in order to avoid surrendering to Russia. This is all going to end disastrously for Ukraine, and the truth about the NATO presence on the ground is going to be revealed. This is why Ukraine is desperately running so many false flags right now, even launching missiles at their own civilians.

Is the CDC blaming gay lifestyles for vaccine injuries?

The other bombshell topic covered today is the fact that the CDC now appears to be blaming gay lifestyles for vaccine injuries. The CDC is claiming there’s an outbreak of meningitis among gay men in Florida, but the symptoms seem to almost perfectly resemble covid vaccine side effects: fever, headache, stiff neck, nausea, vomiting, light sensitivity, confusion and rash.

The CDC announcement on this “meningococcal disease outbreak” is urging gay and bisexual men to take more vaccines.

Nowhere does the CDC suggest that perhaps it’s not natural, nor safe, to engage in anal intercourse due to the blood-to-skin transmission of whatever a person has in their blood.

Importantly, when gay men are vaccinated with mRNA vaccines, their bodies produce toxic spike protein nanoparticles which can be transmitted to gay sex partners via anal intercourse. It is also likely that these spike protein nanoparticles (which are bioweapons) would be present in the semen.

Thus, when gay men get vaccinated and then have sex with other men, they are spreading depopulation weapons across the gay community.

Men having anal intercourse with other men is already risky enough in terms of exposure to fecal pathogens, but adding covid vaccine spike proteins to the cocktail only makes things worse. It’s no surprise that many of the side effects are indicative of nerve damage caused by exposure to toxins.

When the Dr. Ardis details come out later today, you will understand even more why vaccinated gay men are quite literally toxic to other gay men when they engage in anal intercourse or body fluid exchange. They are literally sharing bioweapons toxins and poisoning each other.

So far, the gay community (to my knowledge) has not yet become aware of any of this, but there is a massive CDC cover-up (and covid vaccine cover-up) that presents unique risks to those pursuing gay lifestyles.

Fascinatingly, as much as I urge people to avoid gay sexual activity and multiple partners, anyone who wishes to engage in such behavior for their own reasons should make sure their intercourse partners are not vaccinated with covid vaccines. Especially not mRNA. All people (not just gay people, but everyone) who are injected with mRNA “vaccines” — which aren’t even vaccines at all but are actually gene modification experimental injections — should be considered walking biological weapons factories. This applies to those who are gay, straight, bi, etc.

Even heterosexual partners should be asked whether they’ve been injected with mRNA experiments, because women who have taken the clot shots may be unable to conceive due to the ovary-damaging effects of the vaccines. Men who have been injected may have toxins in their semen.

Bottom line? Never have sex with anyone who took the mRNA transhumanism shots.

Is there an unvaccinated gay dating app? Somehow, I doubt it…

Get all these details and more in today’s Situation Update podcast at:

Brighteon.com/1e687c6a-d3ed-4649-94e5-0f237ca2c462

Dr. Jackie Stone Put it All on the Line to Treat the Ill During the Pandemic: Zimbabwe Throws Criminal Charges at Her

TrialSite chronicled the efforts of Dr. Jackie Stone in Zimbabwe during the worst stages of the pandemic. Born in Zimbabwe, Dr. Stone has been fascinated by research since a young age, and her commitment to caring for people during the pandemic has been legendary. While her off-label ivermectin-based combination regimen was identified with the saving of many lives in this southern African country, the medical establishment isn’t too keen on thinking outside of the box, even during the worst pandemic in a century. Dr. Stone now faces a court trial with criminal charges for merely treating COVID-19 patients with an early outpatient treatment protocol based on a combination of off-label treatments that includes ivermectin. This, even though Dr. Stone treated many in the Zimbabwe government and military successfully. In fact, for a while, the Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe (MCAZ) authorized access on an emergency basis for research—which amounted to care in this low-and middle-income country. The regulatory agency did a turnaround with ivermectin due to the results in the clinic of Dr. Jackie Stone.

Articles about Dr. Stone and Zimbabwe can be found at TrialSite. A fighter to the end originally of English and Norwegian descent, curious, and tough, yet elegant and empathetic, she grew up in the bush in this part of Africa, as her father was involved with geology and mining. Dr. Stone’s ethos, integrity, and commitment to doing good should have led her to awards from groups such as the World Health Organization.

Together Trial Mainstream Media Interpretations Could Put Low-Cost Regimen at Risk in MICs

Stone recently got together remotely with TrialSite’s founder Daniel O’Connor to discuss her concern with the Together Trial. While mainstream media have pounced on the findings, at least a dozen physicians and scientists are findings various issues with the data. 

Ed Mills, the principal investigator, did the right thing investing his time as well as raising money to study repurposed drugs. While the Together trial’s primary endpoint failed to show efficacy for ivermectin, even Mills went on the record in a private email declaring ivermectin proponents should be upbeat about some of the data generated in the study. But Mills’ data was taken by mainstream media and used as a weapon to attack the use of the drug worldwide. This isn’t Dr. Mills’ fault–again he took the time to investigate the drug as well as other important repurposed drugs.

But Stone’s concern centers on the needs of low and middle-income countries (LMICs) for low-cost, available regimens for early care. Stone told TrialSite, “in poor and up-and-coming countries we don’t always have the luxury of waiting around for gold standard evidence. Rather, in the case of the pandemic, we need to move fast, and we did, leading to the saving of many thousands of lives.”

She continued, “My concern now is that papers such as the New York Times or Wall Street Journal pounce on data, often misinterpreting quotes from the PI can lead to a cutting off of life-saving approaches in LMICs such as my country.”

“Dr. Stone’s commitment to LMICs cannot be denied based on a clear track record of success. With COVID-19 came politics around the use of off-label drugs such as ivermectin, and unfortunately, Dr. Stone is caught in the middle of a political battle, but she is one of the most resilient individuals I have ever come across,” reports TrialSite’s O’Connor.

What about Together?

Dozens of scientists and doctors now pour through data of the Together Trial. Recently, Dr. David Wiseman, affiliated with TrialSite, shared a dozen bullet points of concern associated with Together, including inputs from Dr. Flavio Cadegiani and others that TrialSite poses as questions.

Together Trial Questions: Ivermectin

#Question/Concern Issues for Discussion with Together Trial1.Did the ivermectin arm of Together run later than the placebo arm, a time when a more virulent strain was present in that part of Brazil?2.Why wouldn’t the protocol call for screening for ivermectin use—after all the drug was used in many parts of Brazil. Were those participating already using the drug? It would be hard to prove now.3.The critics fret about the lack of reported boosts in gastrointestinal side effects in the ivermectin arm leading to what they believe is a fundamental problem with the study—either A) placebo group was on ivermectin or B) those taking ivermectin were not administered real study drug4.Were these placebo pills produced to look identical to the study drug? As the drug is commonly used, this would have unblinded the study.5.Together used ivermectin alone yet the early care community uses the drug in combination with other economical safe drugs such as antibiotics, steroids, as well as nutraceuticals such as vitamin D, C, and zinc. The study of ivermectin alone doesn’t mean much to frontline doctors.6.Together started up to 8 days post symptom onset, but frontline ivermectin proponents declare the drug should be given immediately upon symptomatic infection. The P.1 variant also saw a faster progression to severe illness only compounding the problem.7.In the Together study, they used a dose of (0.4 mg per kilo per day) which many critics called inadequate for ill patents–was the study underdosed?8.Given ivermectin proponents suggest using the drug till symptoms are resolved, why did the Together protocol only call for use for 3 days?9.Why did the protocol call for administration of the drug on an empty stomach when proponents declare the drug works best when associated with consumption of fatty food?10.Why is so much basic data missing from the study results such as Recruitment Period, Recruitment Locations, Recruitment and allocation order per sit, Description of how the molecules and placebo were produced or compounded to look identical (otherwise loss of blinding); why is there missing age data for 98 patients? Other gaps in data or anomalies are present for those interested11.Some basic math shows that the numbers listed in the trial paper for the different arms and outcomes in the trial do not add up to the totals and percentages that they give – either a gross mathematical error or fraud. To see many of the strange mathematical discrepancies which invalidate the trial conclusions, go to investigative journalist Phil Harper’s article: Moreover Wiseman declares And the alteration of the death count in the trial data raises serious questions:

Seeking more information about Dr. Stone?

For all of those interested in Dr. Stone’s story check out the many articles published in TrialSite along with this important letter authored by Dr. Eleftherios Gkioulekas, Professor of Mathematics Undergraduate Program Coordinator at The University of Texas — Rio Grande Valley School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences in Edinburg, Texas.

Melinda Gates unloads on globalist husband Bill Gates: He had multiple affairs…His “abhorrent” meetings with Jeffrey Epstein was last straw… Sunday, April 10, 2022

(Natural News) Melinda Gates appeared on CBS This Morning with Gayle King to discuss her divorce from her Microsoft founder and billionaire husband, Bill Gates. During her interview, she told King, “I did not like that he’d had meetings with Jeffrey Epstein.” She explained how she met Epstein one time because she wanted to “see who this man was.” “I regretted it from the second I stepped in the door. He was abhorrent. He was evil personified.” After meeting him, Melinda told King that she “made it very clear” to her husband “how I felt about him [Epstein].”

(Article by Patty McMurray republished from 100PercentFedUp.com)

Gates told Kint that there wasn’t only one but several factors that led to her decision to divorce one of the wealthiest men in the world after 27 years of marriage.

“I did not like that he had meetings with Jeffrey Epstein, no. I made that clear to him,” Gates told King.

In a statement to CBS, Bill said that “Meeting with Epstein was a mistake that I regret deeply. It was a substantial error in judgment.”

Vanity Fair reports – Melinda also spoke openly about her ex-husband’s affair with a staffer 20 years ago, which a spokesperson for the Microsoft co-founder confirmed in May 2021. “I certainly believe in forgiveness, so I thought we had worked through some of that,” she confessed. “It wasn’t one moment or one specific thing that happened. There just came a point in time where there was enough there where I realized it just wasn’t healthy, and I couldn’t trust what we had.” When asked by King if there were other affairs over the course of their marriage, the co-chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation replied, “Those are questions Bill needs to answer.”

She went on to say that she “never thought” she would get divorced, but their relationship devolved to a point where she felt she could no longer carry on. “Unfortunately, I felt like I needed to take a different path,” she said. “We knew that when the divorce was going to be a surprise people, and I felt bad about that. I don’t question myself now. Not at all. I gave every single piece of myself to this marriage. I was committed to this marriage from the day we got engaged and until the day I got out of it.”

Read more at: 100PercentFedUp.com

Secret plan to flood America with millions of “economic migrants” exposed as Biden regime declares war on American citizens Tuesday, April 12, 2022 by: JD Heyes

(Natural News) The Biden regime’s plan to completely wreck America, begun in earnest under Barack Obama, is moving forward, as evidenced by the discovery of a secret plan being implemented by Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.

According to Breitbart News, at the behest of Obama’s people who are really running Biden’s White House, Mayorkas has directed his agency to ensure that ‘economic’ migrants are provided with every opportunity to stay illegally in America after Title 42 is lifted in early May, regardless of the massive harm he will cause American citizens.

Mayorkas’ plans were laid out in a February strategy document that was leaked to Breitbart Texas this week. The strategy is called, “DHS Southwest Border Mass Irregular Migration Contingency Plan,” and on page 16 of the document it says:

A. Secretary’s Intent.

1 ) Purpose: The purpose of this plan is to describe a proactive approach that humanely prevents and responds to surges in irregular migration across the U.S. [southern border]. This will be done while ensuring that migrants can apply for any form of relief or protection [emphasis added] for which they may be eligible, including asylum, withholding of removal, and protection from removal under the regulations implementing United States obligations under the Convention Against Torture.

To guarantee the maximum U.S. taxpayer-funded benefits for illegal aliens, the DHS chief is calling for minimal detention and deportation, though federal law generally denies entry of foreign workers and economic migrants to the country. His play is providing ‘authority’ for border agents to ensure as many illegal migrants as possible can be ‘legally’ allowed to stay:

Current pathways to removal [deportations] will be limited. Component use of broadscale release mechanisms (i.e., Own Recognizance (OR) with issuance of a Notice to Appear (NTA), or parole and Alternatives to Detention (ATD) with administrative tools are necessary to ensure humane and efficient treatment of migrants.

What about “humane” treatment of American citizens?

According to Breitbart News, the parole side-door “is a very limited authority that Congress has given for exceptional situations” including a sick airline passenger, Andrew Arthur, a former immigration judge, told the outlet last year. It “is very narrowly written [for small numbers of people], but the administration has blown right past the limitations,” he said, noting that the Obama-Biden-Harris regime simply doesn’t care about U.S. law because they know that no one is going to hold them responsible.

“In February, up to 165,000 migrants arrived at the border, and Mayorkas admitted 74,000 under various legal claims. Very few of the arrivals were detained, and few prior arrivals were deported, despite the federal law,” Breitbart News reported, adding:

The Cuban-born Mayorkas is a pro-migration zealot who argued in 2013 that Americans’ homeland “always has been, and forever will remain a nation of immigrants.” Only about one-third of Americans accept the “nation of immigrants” narrative, according to a survey by a pro-migration group.

So his plan ignores the reasonable and rational economic concerns of roughly at least 100 million citizens of the United States.

As the sworn top official within the Department of Homeland Security, Mayorkas is legally bound to protect the economic interests of American citizens from illegal aliens and unscrupulous U.S.-based employers who hire them. Americans’ concerns include the ability to earn liveable wages within a labor market that is increasingly tight due to the country being at near full employment; flooding the market with illegal workers who will work for less will depress wages, not keep them higher.

The people running Biden’s regime are criminals, pure and simple. They are America-last sycophants who are doing everything they can to destroy our country as founded. If Republicans win big in November and don’t hold these people responsible, then the country we grew up in will have already ceased to exist.

Sources include:

Breitbart.com

InvasionUSA.news

Danish Study Suggests mRNA-based Vaccines Associated with Greater Overall Mortality

Recently scientists from Denmark led an important study suggesting that mRNA-based vaccines such as the ones made by Pfizer or Moderna may not be as safe as adenovirus-based vaccines such as Johnson and Johnson, AstraZeneca/Oxford or the one produced by China’s CanSino Biologics. Led by Peter Aaby, a trained physician and anthropologist that runs a health and demographic surveillance system site in West Africa as part of the Bandim Health Project and Dr. Mihai Netea a well-known award winning Romanian/Dutch scientists and Danish colleagues from Odense Patient Data Explorative Network (OPEN) at University of Southern Denmark, the group scrutinized possible “non-specific effects” (NSEs) of the COVID-19 vaccines probing into overall mortality such as not only COVID-19 deaths but also accidental deaths, cardiovascular deaths and other non-COVID-19 deaths. The team discovered that out of 74,193 participants in mRNA clinical trials and 61 deaths, that based on relative risk there was no real difference between the vaccine and placebo group. While in the adenovirus-based studies with 122,164 participants and 46 deaths the vaccine had nearly half the level of deaths as compared to the controls group.

The study team decided to take a step back and look at the COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial data from a different point of view. They did this because “there is now ample evidence that vaccines can have broad heterologous effects on the immune system.” Such effects can either A) greater protection or B) increased susceptibility to unrelated infections or even other non-infectious autoimmune diseases. The authors report that emerging study data reveals that “vaccines may have completely unexpected effects on overall mortality, different from what could be anticipated based on the protection against the vaccine-targeted disease.”

The study results await peer review thus the data shouldn’t be considered evidence. But the novel approach and consequent findings represent an important potential contribution to our scientific knowledge of the COVID-19 vaccines.

Overall Mortality wasn’t Studied

Taking a different perspective, Dr. Aaby and team share that the current batch of COVID-19 vaccines were not tested to evaluate their effects on overall mortality. That would have been difficult given the short follow-up in the studies as subjects participating in the control groups received the vaccine after 3-6 months based on the emergency use authorization situation.

Surprisingly, although all would assume that the COVID-19 vaccines would reduce overall mortality in the pandemic this assumption hasn’t been formally vetted in studies. 

The authors utilized the final study reports available from the COVID-19 vaccine trials investigating the impact of mRNA and adenovirus-vector COVID-19 vaccines on overall mortality, including the previously mentioned other categories such as cardiovascular-related deaths.

The Findings

The table below highlights these study findings:

ParticipantsDeathsRelative RiskmRNA74,19361 (mRNA 31; placebo; 30)1.03 (95% CI=0.63-1.71)Adenovirus122,16446 (vaccine: 16; controls:30)0.37 (0.19-0.70)

Aaby and team report that the adenovirus-vector vaccines were associated with protection against COVID-19 deaths (RR=0.11 (0.02-0.87)) and non-accident, non-COVID-19 deaths (RR=0.38 (0.17-0.88)).

Of note, mRNA-based vaccines differ markedly from adenovirus vaccines regarding impact on overall mortality (p=0.030) as well as non-accident, non-COVID-19 deaths (p=0.046). The placebo-controlled RCTs of COVID-19 vaccines were halted rapidly due to clear effects on COVID-19 infections. Importantly the data derived from this study suggest an important need for randomized controlled trials of mRNA and adeno-vectored vaccines head-to-head comparing long-term effects on overall mortality.

Brief Discussion

Of course, many experts may summarily dismiss such findings as not relevant. After all the COVID-19 studies were designed to determine if the vaccines were effective in protecting against death from SARS-CoV-2, the virus behind COVID-19. Yet the authors point out that “non-specific effects, and their immunological basis, have been established for several other vaccines.”  For example, the authors point to randomized controlled trials showing that BCG vaccine against tuberculosis (TB) lessens neonatal mortality, yet this was because the vaccine protects against deaths from sepsis and respiratory infections.

They point out that “immunological studies have shown that such effects are indeed biologically plausible; BCG positively affects the innate immune system leading to enhanced resistance towards a broad range of pathogens. Furthermore, the BCG vaccine has been associated with decreased systemic inflammation.”

Conclusion

The authors conclude that if their findings are in fact validated by randomized controlled studies then the adenovirus-based vaccines may prove beneficial to their “protective heterologous effects…on non-COVID-19 mortality” as well as their effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection.  Could these vaccines represent an advantage in vulnerable populations susceptible to cardiovascular mortality.  Key is a better understanding of the heterologous effects between the different vaccine types.

Study Funding

Dr. Allen Schapira funded the work on non-specific effects of vaccines while some of the previous work was funded by the Danish Council for Development Research, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Denmark; Novo Nordisk Foundation and European Union.   

Lead Research/Investigator

Peter Aaby, DMSc, Bandim Health Project, INDEPTH Network; Bandim Health Institute – OPEN, Institute of Clinical Research

Christine Stabell Benn, University of Southern Denmark – Odense Patient Data Explorative Network (OPEN); Bandim Health Project, INDEPTH Network

Frederik Schaltz-Buchholzer, Statens Serums Institut – Bandim Health Project

Sebastian Nielsen, University of Southern Denmark – Odense Patient Data Explorative Network (OPEN)

Mihai G. Netea, Radboud University Nijmegen – Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases (RCI); Radboud University Nijmegen – Department of Internal Medicine

UK COVID-19 Hospitalizations Skyrocket Among Heavily Vaccinated Population While Deaths on Upswing

While much of the UK’s population now desire to go about life as usual, especially since the government declared times were almost back to normal, unfortunately, the unfolding situation informs a starkly different reality for the heavily vaccinated population. While new SARS-CoV-2 cases seem to be headed toward a more stable reality, this may be only because mass testing is on the way out as SARS-CoV-2-associated deaths increase while hospitalizations have absolutely skyrocketed.

While the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) stops sharing breakthrough infection data, some critical media and blogs (deemed anti-vaxxed by the mass media) emphasize that more vaccinated people get infected and hospitalized than the unvaxxed.

Nearly 60% of the UK’s population has received a third booster dose with almost 75% of the population (and nearly all adults) fully vaccinated. Yet hospitalization cases are skyrocketing. 

An unmistakable growth in hospitalization raises concern across the UK as hospitalization rates have been on a steady climb since even before the onset of 2022.

UK COVID-19 Hospitalization by Quarter

Source: Our World in Data

What about COVID-19-related deaths? These are on the upswing as well. 

Source: Our World in Data

Even though Omicron is generally milder, the mutant sub-variant BA.2 now circulates ever more around the UK. A noticeable uptick in deaths has health authorities concerned. 

Public Health Communication Concerns

With mounting hospitalizations and a spiking death toll associated with COVID, the National Health Service (NHS) starts to experience capacity challenges. In fact, the NHS Confederation warned the government that it needed to reconsider the Living with COVID plan, suggesting the ministers risk “abandoning” the NHS if no action is taken.  

Representing health care organizations, the NHS Confederation reports that the government’s messaging that all is back to normal could very much “Mislead the public and discourage them to take steps to reduce transmission, contributing to the very high rates of COVID-19” as reported by the interest group. 

The organization’s chief executive Matthew Taylor went on the record, “NHS leaders and their teams recognise the need to ‘live with Covid’ as we move towards what the government hopes will become an endemic stage of the pandemic. However, they report a clear disconnect between the Government’s ‘Living with Covid’ plan and the realities they are facing at the NHS front line.”

Border mayor sounds the alarm: ‘What’s coming on the 23rd of May won’t even be describable’ Sunday, April 10, 2022 by: Gregory Van Dyke

(Natural News) Unprecedented chaos is coming to Texas once the Biden administration stops enforcing a public health law that has been one of the factors limiting the flood of immigrants stampeding across the border, according to one Texas mayor.

(Article by Jack Davis republished from WesternJournal.com)

Uvalde Mayor Don McLaughlin Jr. gave a preview of his fears during an appearance on Fox News’ “Fox & Friends” on Friday.

The Biden administration has said that as of May 23, it will no longer enforce Title 42, a rule imposed during the coronavirus pandemic that allowed officials at the border to turn away illegal immigrants on the grounds that they could be bringing the coronavirus into the country.

McLaughlin said Friday that he expects when Title 42 goes away, his community will face an increase of between 75 percent and 100 percent in the number of illegal immigrants with which it must deal.

“We’ve been dealing with this crisis for the last year,” he said, referring to the massive numbers of illegal immigrants who have come into the U.S. since President Joe Biden took office.

McLaughlin said he has no words to picture the next level of America’s illegal immigration crisis.

“What’s coming on the 23rd of May won’t even be describable,” the mayor said. “I mean, you’re talking about thousands of people that are going to hit that border, that are just waiting to cross the border.

“And there’s nobody prepared down here for it. The federal government’s not prepared for it. Thank God Governor Abbott is trying to get prepared for it, but it’s going to be just the wild, wild west and crazy down here,” he said.

On Wednesday, Republican Gov. Greg Abbott announced a series of measures to help his state deal with the flood of migrants, including using “charter buses and flights to transport migrants who have been processed and released from federal custody to Washington, D.C.”

McLaughlin noted that even though Uvalde is not right on the border, it will be drowned in the wave to come, based on what he has seen the federal government do before.

“They’ll get so overwhelmed at the border, they’ll pull all their Border Patrol agents out of the field. They’ll make them processors. They’ll be doing paperwork, and they’ll say, ‘Oh we’re over capacity,’ and they’ll start shipping them to towns like Uvalde,” he said.

The federal government will “dump them” and “then we have to deal with them,” the mayor said.

McLaughlin said the Biden administration has caused the problem and federal officials compound it by denying communities the ability to deal with what the feds have created.

“The federal government ties your hands at every turn,” he said.

Last year, the mayor denounced the Biden administration’s immigration policy as “pretty much a clown show,” according to Fox News.

“It’s just — it is just getting crazier and crazier and crazier and these — these ‘peaceful’ immigrants, illegal immigrants, they keep talking about, are getting more and more aggressive with landowners. They’re doing more destruction of property. They’re tearing things up. Trashing ranch houses, trashing vehicles,” McLaughlin told host Tucker Carlson in September.

”And, you know, you can complain all you want, but this is — this administration turns a blind eye to it. This is such a failed administration and a failed president, it’s terrible,” he said then.

Read more at: WesternJournal.com