Frontline doctor: Millions will develop AIDS from COVID jabs Friday, March 25, 2022 by: Ethan Huff

(Natural News) A Florida-based physician of osteopathic medicine is warning that in just a few short months, millions of people who got “vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) will develop full-blown AIDS.

Dr. Elizabeth Eads, who has been working in her field for 25 years, told USA Watchdog‘s Greg Hunter that the triple injected are showing the worst signs of vaccine-induced AIDS (VAIDS).

Eads and her team are trying to come up with remedies to help them, but the situation is difficult. So far, they have tried hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and ivermectin, but nothing is helping her jab-damaged patients.

“Yes, we are seeing vaccine-related acquired immunodeficiency in the hospital now from the triple vaxxed,” Eads said. “It is a vax injury, and we are not really certain how to treat this. We are kind of throwing the kitchen sink at it. We are trying to use everything we can think of to boost up the CD4 and CD8 counts and reverse this collapse, this calamity of immune collapse. It’s very stunning.”

You can watch a video interview with Eads at NewsWars.com.

COVID “booster” shots are the “kill shot,” Eads warns

Eads said she is seeing a trend where the people who are the worst-off in terms of showing autoimmune or neurodegenerative symptoms are those who took the most injections.

The triple-shot, in other words, have basically destroyed their immune systems. The single- and double-shot might be able to recover, or perhaps it is just taking a lot longer for their damaged immune systems to degrade.

Eads said the third injection is a “kill shot” or a “money ball” because of how “devastating” it is to the immune system.

“If you look at the recent Stanford study, and I am just going to read a couple of sentences from the Stanford study: ‘The spike protein in the COVID-19 vaccines that everyone is talking about is called the lentivirus. The lenti contains a combination of HIV, types one through three, SRV/1, which is AIDS, MERS and SARS,'” she explained.

“In the Stanford study, the best-known lentivirus is the human immune deficiency pathogen, which causes AIDS. This is why we are seeing autoimmune and neurodegenerative decline after the COVID-19 vaccine, especially the booster. It permanently changes the genome of the cell. That is why this is so terrifying to us in the medical community. We just don’t know how to attack this.”

According to Eads, the spike lentivirus is made up of HIV and AIDS, along with SARS and MERS. This, she said, is why both the vaccinated and the “boosted” are getting seriously ill and dying.

“That’s why they dominate the hospitalizations regarding COVID illness as well,” Eads emphasized.

From about April through the summer, Eads expects to see a whole lot more cases of AIDS diagnosed in the fully vaccinated, and especially in the 18-39 age demographic. Over the next year, the fully jabbed in their 40s and 50s will catch up with the younger group as their immune systems start to collapse.

A U.K. Health Security Agency study found that fully jabbed people in the 30-70 age demographic have already lost about 70 percent of their immune system capacity. That percentage will only continue to increase in the coming months and years.

Another thing we are seeing is a sharp uptick in cancer cases among the fully jabbed. Malignant neo-plasma of the esophagus is up 794 percent while malignant neo-plasma of the stomach, colon and pancreas is up 524 percent.

“Breast cancer up 387 percent, ovarian cancer up 537 percent, testicular cancer up 269 percent. These are numbers from 2021,” Eads further revealed.

People everywhere are developing serious chronic illnesses or dying due to Fauci Flu shots. You can keep up with the latest at ChemicalViolence.com.

Sources include:

NewsWars.com

NaturalNews.com

COVID vaccine coordinator who aggressively pushed mRNA shots dies “unexpectedly” – was it the jab? Friday, March 25, 2022 by: Ethan Huff

(Natural News) Dr. SarahBeth Hartlage, Louisville’s Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “vaccine” coordinator, has “died unexpectedly,” according to reports. And the weird part is that nobody is saying why.

Hartlage was an aggressive proponent of mRNA (messenger RNA) injections, urging people online, in person, and in briefings with Louisville’s mayor to roll up their sleeves for the shots as soon as possible.

At one point, Hartlage tweeted a photo of herself opening a box of mRNA injections along with a caption explaining that she had just had “a little visit from the Pfizer fairy.”

When federal regulators green-lighted mRNA injections for children as young as five, Hartlage was thrilled. Every chance she got, Hartlage pushed the shots on anyone and everyone. She even ran the city’s vaccine clinic, which injected area residents with nearly 120,000 shots.

Worst of all, Hartlage was a strong proponent for jab mandates. She was not content with just offering the syringes to Kentuckians: she wanted them forced on the people of her city and state.

Then, Hartlage died out of the blue. She was attending a medical conference in Florida when she reportedly suffered a “sudden and unexpected” loss of life. Hartlage was just 36 years old at the time of her death.

“Beyond that, no details are available,” reports Alex Berenson.

When you push covid jabs publicly and call for mandates, you forfeit your right to privacy

In the vast majority of cases, sudden deaths in adults under the age of 40 are usually caused by a drug overdose or suicide. Based on Hartlage’s Twitter feed, neither of these seem to be the case.

In her final tweet before perishing, Hartlage gave a “shoutout” to a NICU doctor who joined her in responding to a mid-flight emergency.

“Starting an IV @ 35k ft, crouching in an aisle – complete with turbulence – was a new experience!” she wrote.

“Resources mid-air are very limited, and we were very glad to be met by EMS on the ground!”

Under normal circumstances, the cause of Hartlage’s death would naturally be a private affair. But because she was constantly pushing injections that are known to be injuring and killing thousands or even millions of young people, the public has a right to know.

There is a reason why Pfizer secretly added heart attack pharmaceuticals to its child-version covid shot: because young people everywhere are dropping dead from the injection.

Chances are that Hartlage suffered a similar fate. But because the city of Louisville refuses to fess up as to what happened, the world is left speculating as to why this vaccine zealot lost her life at a relatively young age.

“… she forfeited her right to privacy when she cajoled other people to take Covid shots that are known to have cardiac dangers to young people – and even encouraged mandatory vaccinations,” Berenson writes about Hartdubdtscklage.

“‘Sudden and unexpected’ will not do. (If I ‘died after a brief illness,’ you can bet the blue checks on Twitter would insist on knowing whether Covid had killed me; and they’d be right to ask.) … The city of Louisville needs to be honest about what happened, the sooner the better.”

In the comment section on Berenson’s substack, one guy wrote that similar mysterious deaths happened in his town, one to a young mom in his school and another to a young fireman from the area.

“It has happened all over the country,” he added. “We know the shots are killing people – insurance data doesn’t lie.”

Another joked that it was probably an overdose:

“Too much spike protein is deadly, you know.”

The latest news about covid jab injuries and deaths can be found at ChemicalViolence.com.

Sources for this article include:

AlexBerenson.substack.com

NaturalNews.com

South Korea: the world’s worst birth dearth On their way to oblivion by Louis T. March

As a young’un, whenever some person or group of folks did something that struck me as peculiar, my mother, a teacher and lady of inestimable patience, would explain and say, “You know, son, people are funny.” Ain’t that the truth!

Well, there’s a bunch of folks halfway round the world (from me) that are doing something way peculiar – just downright weird. They’re committing national suicide. This is not like individual suicide – sudden, deliberate, and unexpected. This is a collective hari-kari, a passive, palpably predictable process playing out over generations.

We’re talking about South Korea. Visitors to that Asian dynamo consistently come home with a fondness for the Koreans. They are nice to visitors and take good care of themselves. There is very little poverty. But they are willfully obliterating, via malign neglect, the future of their very own families and the nation those families forged.

They are hardly having children, and their numbers are starting to drop like a stone.

Last year yours truly reported on South Korea.

The big story then was that they had the lowest fertility rate on the planet, a stunning 0.84. (replacement-level being 2.1). Some in mainstream media posited that Covid, recession and/or climate change was the reason. Wrong.

So, revisiting the South Korean situation is in order. Why? Because the latest news from Statistics Korea is that South Korea has broken its own record with a 2021 fertility rate of 0.81. Scary. This marks their fourth straight year of less than 1.0 fertility!

The Korea Times called it a “bleak demographic situation.” Talk about understatement! Sounds like my Virginia ancestors referring to the Civil War as “the late unpleasantness.” Where’s the alarm? Does anyone care enough to get bent out of shape and at least try to rouse the masses about their coming extinction?

Or do the people simply not care that their kith and kin, their very kind, will disappear from the face of the earth – barring a severe societal course correction?

The demographic situation in 2021

South Koreans are industrious. They’re part of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), that club of uber-productive economies that accounts for well north of 60 percent of global GDP. How long they can continue as an economic powerhouse remains to be seen. That’s because the birth dearth shrinks the workforce. In 2020 there were 37.4 million South Koreans of working age (15 to 64), or 72.4 percent of the total population. There were workers aplenty to support dependent retirees and children. But Statistics Korea has issued a grim forecast: If the current pattern of fertility (or lack thereof) holds, South Korea’s working age population will be only 17.4 million by 2070, a 53.5 percent decrease in just 50 years.

Nobody is apoplectic about it. They are insufferably insouciant. The “who cares?” attitude prevails. Sheer anomie.

When I see highly intelligent people willfully consigning themselves to the dustbin of history, it puzzles me. Are we missing something? Per The World Atlas (generally agreed upon):

Humans and their ancestors have been walking the planet for about 6 million years. Homo sapiens, who are the modern form of humans evolved 300,000 years ago from Homo erectus. Human civilizations started forming around 6,000 years ago.

That makes me wonder – is civilization an aberration for humanity? Does our higher civilization, with all its high-dollar baubles, mean the end of humanity? Yes, civilizations rise and fall. Wars, plagues and ginormous natural disasters have reduced populations before. But as far as we know, the last 70 years is the first time that populations have begun to wither away from lack of offspring. The Lord works in mysterious ways. What does Mother Nature know about this that we don’t?

Back to South Korea. Their record-breaking low fertility has been a long time coming. Demographers are not surprised. Here are the grisly stats:

• In 2020, 272,300 births; in 2021, 206,500 – a 4.3 percent decline in one year

• In 2020, 305,000 deaths; in 2021, 317,800 – a 4.2 percent increase

• In 2020, a 33,000 population decline; in 2021, a 57,300 decline

Statistics Korea’s Noh Hyung-joon: “This trend is expected to continue as the number of newborns will keep declining and deaths will likely rise amid rapid aging.” He announced this at a press briefing without a hint of dismay, disappointment or alarm in his voice.

The Korea Times reported, “A fall in the working population means a decline in labor supply, potentially undercutting economic growth.” Yes, it is everywhere lamented how the lack of babies will impact the economy. It’s all about mammon. Children are expensive. Children interfere with money-making careers. The love of money is the root of collapsing fertility.

Unfortunately, South Koreans (like so many others) are suffused in secularism, temporal to a tee. They make good money, get all the latest gadgets, and are addicted to that debilitating workaholism prevalent in East Asia. Highly competitive, they are so good at the produce-and-consume game that they’re pricing themselves out of being able to support a family.

But many don’t even want a family. Material success is first and foremost. Children impede that, and it is the materialist, consumerist yardstick by which they measure success. Their priorities – no, their values – are way off, and in the long run that will destroy the nation they have built through the millennia.

Many South Koreans are so thoroughly, pathologically modern. About half claim no religious affiliation. Every religion they have historically followed (including Christianity) adjures the faithful in one way or another to be fruitful and multiply.

But not the religion of secularism. That’s the modernist creed of “do your own thing – as long as it is PC.” Like their European and American counterparts, South Koreans are saturated in secularism – a “me generation” mentality on steroids.

The government is trying hard to incentivize marriage and children, thus far to no avail.

“Whom the gods would destroy they first make mad.”

Louis T. March

Louis T. March has a background in government, business and philanthropy. A former talk show host, author and public speaker, he is a dedicated student of history and genealogy. Louis lives with his family... More by Louis T. March

Alabama Moves Forward with Ivermectin Legislation TrialSite Staff

Alabama is following the lead of several states to pass try and pass legislation allowing physicians to prescribe “off label” medications like ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19. Alabama Bill SB 312 mandates that “occupational licensing boards prohibited to take adverse action based on physician’s recommended COVID-19 treatment, health care facilities and pharmacies required to fulfill patient’s COVID-19 treatment request”.

New Bill Goes One Step Further

The legislation, introduced by Republican Senator Arthur Orr of Decatur, prevents “occupational licensing boards from taking punitive actions against doctors who prescribe “off-label” drugs for the treatment of COVID-19.” This is a marked difference from bills in other states, even ones that received “legal opinions” from States Attorneys General supporting the legislation. For example, in South Carolina, Attorney General Alan Wilson issued an opinion supporting a doctor’s right to prescribe ivermectin for treatment of Covid-19 but did not weigh in on the physician-employer relationship.  

If a doctor does prescribe the “controversial” medication, Wilson’s opinion does not take into account the prescriber may be going against the rules of the health care provider who employs the physician. A doctor in Pennsylvania was fired for prescribing ivermectin. 

The Alabama bill would force “healthcare facilities to provide these drugs, procedures or devices to any patient who requested them for the treatment of Covid-19.” The legislation maintains since ivermectin and other drugs are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) they can be prescribed for treatment of covid, even though the FDA recommends that ivermectin not be used for covid treatment. The FDA has consistently referred to ivermectin as a “horse de wormer.”

Legislation Hands Power to Doctors

The bill went through a “sparsely” attended committee and was approved by a vote of 4-0 and now goes to the state senate. The legislation stipulates, “a licensing board shall not revoke, suspend, fail to renew, or take action against a physician’s license based solely on a physician’s recommended or prescribed treatment for COVID-19 if the physician exercised independent medical judgment, believes that the medical treatment is in the best interest of the patient, and the patient provided written, informed consent before receiving the treatment.” As stated in the last sentence, which is crucial, the patient is required to sign an informed consent form and release all parties from liability which includes the doctor, the facility, and the licensing board. 

The Alabama legislation differs from other states because of the patient release and points out the “off label” drugs are FDA approved. As Senator Orr stated, “we’re only talking about FDA-approved medications, just using them off-label.” Opposition to the bill came from the Alabama Association for Justice, which represents lawyers. The attorneys were concerned with some of the immunity the legislation would provide. With only seven days left in the legislative session, it is unclear when the bill will be brought to a vote.

Moderna to File for Approval of COVID Vaccine in Children Under Six Years of Age Despite 38-44% Efficacy Rate TrialSite Staff

Moderna Therapeutics announced positive interim data from the Phase 2/3 KidCOVE study of its COVID-19 vaccine (mRNA-1273) in children 6 months to under 2 years and 2 years to under 6 years of age. This interim analysis showed a strong antibody response in both age groups after a 25 µg two-dose primary series of mRNA-1273, along with a favorable safety profile. However, the vaccine didn’t match the 90% efficacy seen in adults in late-stage trials. In children 6 months to 2 years, efficacy against infection was 43.7% and it was 37.5% in the 2 to under 6 years age group. Moderna blamed the efficacy rate drop on the emergence of Omicron and said these rates are still statistically significant.

Based on these data, Moderna said it will submit a request for authorization of a 25 μg two-dose primary series of mRNA-1273 for children 6 months to under 6 years of age to the U.S FDA, European Medicines Agency (EMA), and other global regulators in the coming weeks. Additionally, Moderna is filing an Emergency Use Authorization submission for use in children ages 6 to 11 years old and is updating the EUA submission to the FDA for mRNA-1273 in adolescents ages 12 to 17 years with additional follow-up data. 

KidCOVE is a randomized, observer-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate two doses of mRNA-1273 given to healthy children 28 days apart. The study population is divided into three age groups (6 to <12 years, 2 to <6 years, and 6 months to <2 years). In the study, efficacy could be evaluated if enough cases accrued. Overall, the Company enrolled approximately 11,700 pediatric participants in the U.S. and Canada into the trial including approximately 4,200 children ages 2 to under 6 years and approximately 2,500 children ages 6 months to under 2 years. The trial is expected to be complete in June of 2023.

Moderna is preparing to evaluate the potential of a booster dose for all pediatric populations, including those age 6 months to under 6 years, 6 to under 12 years, and adolescents. 

Purge of Ivermectin Intensifies: Florida Atlantic University’s Dr. Andreea Molnar and Colleagues Call for Moratorium on All COVID Prescriptions TrialSite Staff

Recently Andreea Molnar, MD from the Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University and colleagues published a commentary in the journal Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science calling for a moratorium on the prescribing of ivermectin.

A team of authors from both FAU’s Schmidt College of Medicine and the University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health collaborated to propose blocking all ivermectin prescriptions for COVID-19 patients. Other authors included the highly published Charles H. Hennekens, MD, DrPH. 

TrialSite has chronicled the research behind ivermectin since the original Australia-based lab study early on in the pandemic.    As studies in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) such as Bangladesh, Brazil, Egypt and several other places showed promising results a case series study in the U.S. at Broward County Health also demonstrated notably positive outcomes (although that ICON study wasn’t a randomized controlled trial).  This media covered the turnaround in India’s largest state—Uttar Pradesh. Even Israel’s top tropical medicine expert led a small study advocating for its potential.

Of course, lots of controversy and drama have unfolded with this seemingly innocuous generic drug, including the emergence of a relatively small,  but committed group of doctors across America that prescribe the FDA—approved antiparasitic drug off label. Once known as the “Wonder Drug,” the developers of the drug won a Nobel Prize. It has been shown to be safe with billions of doses administered in tropical locations as part of the Mectizan program for example.  There the drug has helped to significantly fight on River Blindness and Lymphatic Filariasis.

As TrialSite reported prescriptions skyrocketed from just over 3,500 per week to nearly 90,000 per week representing what this media estimated was over $300 million per annum in sales. One University of Michigan-led study alone pegged the insurance reimbursement at $130 million (this precluded cash payments).

With transparency into the unfolding magnitude associated with the growing demand a purge commenced led often indirectly by the federal government via the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).  The Gold Standard agency got directly involved in social network campaigns—some even allege they were part of an intricate misinformation campaign including major media.

A couple of high-profile studies showed no efficacy (although critics raise various problems with at least some of these studies) and given growing medical establishment and regulatory pressure prescriptions now have declined to about $39,102 per week. Now a group of doctors associated with a couple of academic medical centers hope to bring that sales total to zero.

Proposed Suspension

Florida Atlantic University’s Dr. Molnar and colleagues call for an outright moratorium on any prescriptions to treat COVID-19. They make an exception for supplying any randomized controlled trials such as the U.S. government-sponsored ACTIV-6 trial. 

Rather Molnar  et al. declares physicians should tell their patients now receiving ivermectin prescriptions to get vaccines and wear masks. And of course, they remind all about the new COVID-19 therapies on the market from both Merck and Pfizer. Those therapies do have limitations and some national health leads have expressed concerns about molnupiravir.  

The authors don’t address fundamental concerns involving waning immunity, or evading immunity associated with Omicron nor is the science for masks solidified  (and in fact most states are dropping mask mandates) yet these elements are deemed necessary by the authors to doctors are “doing better than harm.”

It would appear Dr. Molnar earned her MD in Romania and is somehow affiliated with Florida Atlantic University but is not listed in the directory. In a LinkedIn profile, Dr. Molnar appears to be affiliated with a research project called “Metflix” as well as studies with the Lumen Foundation. As mentioned, other authors include respected physicians and academicians at both Florida Atlantic University and University of Wisconsin.

Moderna Fails to Disclose Full Trial Data for COVID-19 Vaccine for Young Kids Dr-Ron-Brown

As news of Moderna’s new wonder vaccine to prevent COVID-19 in young children flashes across the media today, a vital piece of information is missing in the Cambridge, Massachusetts pharmaceutical company’s media release. Moderna’s interim analysis of vaccine efficacy, the relative risk reduction (RRR) in the Phase 3 KidCOVE study of its COVID-19 vaccine for children six months to two years, and two years to six years is 43.7% and 37.5%, respectively. Moderna Announces its COVID-19 Vaccine Phase 2/3 Study in Children. Not surprisingly, Moderna’s report doesn’t mention the more clinically meaningful absolute risk reduction (ARR) of the vaccine, which is the mathematical difference between the infection rates in the vaccine and placebo groups of the clinical trial. 

Usually, the absolute risk reduction is easily calculated from reported clinical trial data. But Moderna appears to have carefully omitted reporting any of the clinical trial data in its interim analysis that would enable one to calculate the absolute risk reduction. That is, Moderna’s report doesn’t list the specific number of children who were infected in the vaccine and placebo groups—the percentage of infected children per group. 

Subtracting the percentage of infected children in the vaccine group from the percentage of infected children in the placebo group equals the absolute risk reduction. But without disclosing the baseline risk (the risk in the placebo group), it’s impossible to calculate the absolute risk reduction and the number needed to vaccinate to prevent one infection.

Why is Reporting the ARR Important?

Moderna has a history of reporting a vaccine efficacy of approximately 95% for its mRNA COVID-19 vaccine for adults, when the reality is that the vaccine’s absolute risk reduction is only 1.1%. Outcome Reporting Bias in COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Clinical Trials. This should warn parents and guardians to expect that the ARR could be much lower than the reported RRR in Moderna’s latest version of the vaccine for young children. 

Moderna’s report concludes, “We believe these latest results from the KidCOVE study are good news for parents of children under 6 years of age.”

In my opinion, no parent or guardian of young children should trust Moderna’s interim report on its vaccine for young kids!