Biden Executive Order Outlines Plan for Central Bank Digital Currency as the U.S. Dollar’s Status as the #1 World Currency is Almost Over

Last week the White House published the “Executive Order on Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets” that will pave the way to a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) while regulating, and possibly eliminating, all competing cryptocurrencies.

This is the end game for the Great Reset, which started with the COVID Plandemic in 2020, and is being further advanced today with the war in Ukraine.

The Globalists who run the world’s financial systems are mostly bankers, and they know that “payday” is almost here now, while the masses are mostly clueless and just assume that the world’s economy, particularly in the West, will just continue on forever running up debt and creating fiat cash out of thin air, not realizing that at some point people need to stop consuming and start producing something.

The end goal for the Globalists here is the complete replacement of fiat currencies and hard cash with digital money that is controlled by the Central Banks.

Just how far they are able to advance to reach this end goal is dependent upon YOU, the consumer, and how willing you are to resist, and to change your way of living to start moving into the segment of the population that produces goods and services, rather than depend upon “the system” to take care of you and provide everything for you.

Because once that “system” eliminates cash and local currencies in favor of CBDCs, then your slavery to that system will be complete, and there will be NOTHING you can do without their permission.

Much of the Biden EO on digital currencies give 6 months to plan most of how this will be implemented, but don’t be fooled into thinking you still have a lot of time to prepare for this, because China is already far ahead of the U.S. in moving to a financial system based on CBDCs, and the U.S. is playing catch up at this point. The days of the U.S. dollar being the world’s #1 currency are almost over now. See:

Petrodollar Cracks: Saudi Arabia Considers Accepting Yuan For Chinese Oil Sales

The current financial system is hanging on by a thread, and that thread can snap at any point, any day now. Massive food shortages await Americans, and have already begun in poorer countries around the world, which will cause massive social unrest.

At any point an attack on our infrastructure, such as power grids and the Internet, or a military strike on our military bases such as a nuclear attack, could crash the financial system and leave people almost completely helpless if they are not prepared to live outside of “the system.”

And if you are one of the believers in cryptocurrencies and believe that you have found a safe haven there, you are in for a rude awakening. Just ask the 25,000 Russians who were locked out of their digital wallets last week.

Crypto Currency WARNING! Coinbase Cuts Off 25K Russian Wallets!

I had a few comments from cryptocurrency believers email me after I published that article, telling me I was wrong, stating, among other things, that digital wallets do not have to be stored at the digital currency exchanges, as if that really mattered.

Even if you have all of your digital currencies stored on a local computer that is not connected to the Internet, what good is that going to do you if the power grid and Internet go down? Even if you have backup power to run your computer or device where your digital wallet is, what do you plan to do with that “digital currency” when you cannot access the Internet?

Bitcoin, the largest of current cryptocurrencies, is probably on the way out due to its “energy-intensive computing process known as proof-of-work.”

The Biden EO just published has plenty to say about “climate change,” and there can be no doubt that they are targeting Bitcoin and its power hungry methods for “mining.”

We must take strong steps to reduce the risks that digital assets could pose to consumers, investors, and business protections; financial stability and financial system integrity; combating and preventing crime and illicit finance; national security; the ability to exercise human rights; financial inclusion and equity; and climate change and pollution.

If we have learned anything from the past two years during COVID, it is that the U.S. Government has ZERO interest in protecting us from anything, but instead is suspending all rule of law through emergency orders with the goal of controlling every aspect of our lives.

The current cryptocurrencies are a threat to the U.S. Government and the Bankers who control the world’s financial system, and not a threat to “consumers, investors, and businesses” that need to be “protected” by the U.S. Government.

What Can you Do to Prepare for the Move to CBDCs?

The implementation of CBDCs and the replacement of cash is a train that has left the station, and it is not coming back.

China is already in the implementation stage, as CNN Business reports:

China, the world’s second-largest economy by gross domestic product, soft-launched its digital renminbi in January and the CBDC already boasts more than a hundred million users. All told, around 100 countries are exploring CBDCs at one level or another, International Monetary Fund managing director Kristalina Georgieva said during remarks at the Atlantic Council think tank last month.

“We have moved beyond conceptual discussions of CBDCs and we are now in the phase of experimentation,” Georgieva said. “Central banks are rolling up their sleeves and familiarizing themselves with the bits and bytes of digital money.”

David Yermack, the finance department chair at New York University’s Stern School of Business, told CNN Business that it is now “inevitable the entire world will be issuing money in this way.”

In the United States, the pandemic propelled demand for cashless payment methods and many Main Street investors have embraced cryptocurrencies like bitcoin and ethereum, putting pressure on the government not to fall behind on the trend. (Source.)

If the implementation of CBDCs in the U.S. follows the same path as China, there will be a transition period where it will be voluntary at first. I am sure there will be financial incentives to lure people into the system, like luring an animal into a baited trap.

Do not volunteer! The fewer the people who volunteer to setup the system, the more difficult it will be to develop and implement it.

Secondly, use cash instead of credit cards right now as much as possible. Every time you make a charge on your credit card when you are out in public, you are leaving a digital footprint to track and analyze you.

Start practicing now on how to use the system as little as possible, while it is still voluntary.

Have some cash on hand in case the grid goes down and you cannot use an ATM or go to your bank to make withdrawals.

It is very likely that a “black market” will develop as a parallel economy if enough people resist, and cash may still hold some value for a while even after the switch over to CBDCs is completed.

However, like the “mark of the beast” mentioned in the Bible, the day is coming, probably sooner rather than later, where to participate in the “system” you will be forced to use their CBDCs.

It is going to take not only consumers resisting the roll-out of CBDCs, but also business owners, who will have no choice but to start participating in a parallel economy if they don’t want to be part of the “system.”

And it won’t be easy. That’s why it ultimately all comes down to the consumer, and just how much they resist, or comply, to the Globalists’ system.

Private membership clubs will need to be formed at the local community level to support these businesses, in order to bypass the “system.”

But to participate in a parallel economy like this, you have to be able to produce something that has value to others, or you won’t survive.

Some of that “production” will be service production, and people who have skills to “fix” things will be in high demand, and able to easily trade their services for hard assets, like food.

Others who are “healers” and know how to deal with illness apart from the medical system and their toxic poisonous products will also be in high demand.

If you are a homeschool parent, the best skills you can be teaching your children right now are how to provide these high-value services that will be needed in the future to serve those who choose to not be part of the “system.” If you want to teach them a second language, strongly consider Simplified Chinese, as there is little doubt that China is poised to take over as the world’s largest economy in the future.

As a business owner of an ecommerce company for the past 20 years, let me tell you what we have been planning since the roll-out of COVID.

We fully realize that our days of being able to sell our products over the Internet are probably numbered at this point. Once Digital IDs are rolled out and CBDCs implemented, we will probably not be able to continue selling over the Internet without complying to the “system.”

So for the past two years we have been actively recruiting local distributors where we can spread our inventory out across the country and have our products available in local communities, and not just at a central warehouse.

We are investing heavily in long-term storage products, like whole grains, honey, sugar, green coffee beans, and coconut oil, which all have an indefinite shelf life.

We currently have a 2-3 year supply of grains, and are actively trying to buy more. And these are not just any grains, but grains that meet our standards and are not contaminated with glyphosate and other herbicides and pesticides, focusing on ancient and heirloom varieties, so that these grains can also be planted and grown, if necessary. Our corn is an heirloom variety from Central Mexico where GMOs are banned.

I have seen this coming (the elimination of cash and the roll out of CBDCs) since COVID started, and changed our business management to focus on purchasing and storing food that has a long shelf life, as opposed to keeping a cash reserve in the bank.

And you would do well to start planning the same way. Be prepared for the day, which may not be too far off in the future, where your U.S. dollars sitting in a bank account will become almost worthless. Watch what is happening right now in Russia and Ukraine to their financial systems, and understand that the very same thing can happen here in the U.S.

If you run a small business that serves your community, start doubling and tripling your supplies while you still can, rather than leaving your money in the bank where it can quickly disappear.

Start networking with the producers in your community. If they are in the agricultural industry supplying the commodity food chain, chances are pretty good that they would gladly start selling to consumers in their community instead, if there are enough people willing to stop purchasing from national corporate chains, and buy local instead.

In the meantime, start making some changes in your life to get prepared for what is ahead. Spring is coming, and this is a good time to store some heirloom seeds and begin growing some of your own food and herbs. Start investing in things that will allow you to become more of a producer than a consumer. Start moving your cash into hard assets, which does NOT include cryptocurrencies.

Stock up on food, ammo, lumber, and other supplies that will probably become in high demand when the economy crashes, especially supplies for any business or trade you are a part of.

Start learning new skills that you can leverage in an alternative economy. Learn how to butcher animals, for example. We saw in 2020 how farmers were stuck with animals they could not butcher because of not being able to book processing time at their local meat processor, and you can be sure that is probably going to happen again.

If you don’t want to be a slave to the tyrants once they switch over to a cashless society with only CBDCs, then you are going to have to earn your freedom, because no one is going to just give it you.

If you are not prepared, then the day may soon come where your only option, if you want to have food to survive and have a place to sleep, will be something like a government-run FEMA camp. And even then, you most assuredly will need to be fully vaccinated to be able to enter.

Yes, that is the worst case scenario, but do you really want to take a chance that this would never happen?

How Big Pharma won its war against cheap, effective Ivermectin Steven W. Mosher March 14, 2022

Dr. Andrew Hill, tasked with studying the cheap, widely available drug, undermined his own findings

Steven W. Mosher
March 14, 2022

LIVERPOOL, England (LifeSiteNews) — Providence will occasionally place a man at a key juncture of history, a position of great moment where the fate of millions lies in his hands.

Andrew Hill, M.D., was just such a man, in just such a position. In October 2020 he was asked by the WHO to review the rapidly accumulating evidence that Ivermectin was a safe and effective treatment for COVID.

To say there was a lot riding on Hill’s findings was an understatement. If it turned out that this generic drug, cheap to manufacture and already widely available, could knock out COVID, then it could be rapidly deployed. Countless lives could be saved. 

Hill seemed eminently qualified for his assigned task. A senior visiting Research Fellow in the Pharmacology Department at Liverpool University, he had been researching viruses and their treatments for 30 years. He was also, not incidentally, an advisor to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation as well as the Clinton Foundation.  

No one would call Dr. Hill’s competence to perform such an evaluation into question. But, as we have seen throughout the COVID pandemic, competence is no substitute for character. Or for courage. 

As Hill assembled his data, he was more and more impressed by what he found. He made a presentation to the NIH with other advocates of Ivermectin and spoke in favor of its use. On December 29, 2020, he wrote on Twitter that “Ivermectin is showing effects on viral clearance, hospitalization and survival across a wide range of randomized trials in different countries.” He even admitted that if his 58-year-old brother got COVID, he would give him Ivermectin.

Related Stories: Blasted Ovaries: The Failure of Contraceptive Vaccines

He told the front-line doctors with whom he had been collaborating up to this point, who themselves had saved thousands of lives by using Ivermectin, that his report was almost ready. They were anxiously awaiting its release. And they weren’t the only ones. 

Big Pharma was watching too. They had developed an experimental gene therapy to treat COVID. But this “vaccine”—as they were careful to refer to it—could not be approved by the FDA if there was an effective therapeutic drug available. If WHO said that Ivermectin was safe and effective, they stood to lose hundreds of billions of dollars in sales. 

Dr Hill’s report, when it came out on January 18, 2021, was chock-full of evidence that this cheap, widely available drug was the weapon that humanity needed to defeat COVID. But instead of reaching the obvious conclusion, he punted: “Ivermectin should be validated in larger appropriately controlled randomized trials before the results are sufficient for review by regulatory authorities.” 

As soon as Hill published his paper—in a preprint, rather than a refereed scholarly journal—as if on cue, a massive campaign to discredit Ivermectin was unleashed. 

The front-line doctors were shocked and heartbroken. Why did Hill effectively kill the most promising therapeutic drug for treating COVID? Who had gotten to Hill? Who had forced this wrenching conclusion on him? 

Related Stories: 48 Pro-Life Organizations in Latin America Thank President Trump for Defending the Right to Life Abroad

Dr. Tess Lawrie has now answered that question. In a brilliant 18-minute video (also available on Rumble here ) she recounts her interactions with Andrew Hill, including video of a final Zoom call in which she begs him to rewrite the conclusion of his paper and save lives: “Come out in support of Ivermectin,” she pleads. “You know the science supports it. We can save lives. People are dying unnecessarily.”

Dr. Hill hems and haws and finally—with guilt written all over his face—says he will come out in favor of Ivermectin “in six weeks. … I’m doing everything I can.” 

Dr. Lawrie replies, “You’re not doing everything you can. Doing everything you can would involve saying to those people who are paying you that, ‘I’m not going to support this.’”  

Hill didn’t come out in favor of Ivermectin in six weeks—or ever. Instead, he went full anti-Ivermectin. On October 1, 2021, we find him on Twitter advertising a lecture he was slated to give. It was entitled “Effects of Bias and Potential Medical Fraud in the Promotion of Ivermectin.’” The sell-out was complete. 

So who were “those people,” as Dr. Lawrie calls them, who were paying Hill? She asks him repeatedly to tell her who pressured him to alter his conclusion. Again and again Hill bobs and weaves, telling her that he’s in “a tricky situation.” He finally admits, while looking away from the camera in embarrassment, that “Unitaid” had a hand in making revisions to his paper. 

Related Stories: You can thank the Chinese Communist Party for the coronavirus epidemic

Now Unitaid happens to be the very health-related NGO that helped to sponsor Hill’s meta-analysis in the first place. His paymasters, if you will.  

And Unitaid is a very big deal: an affiliate of the World Health Organization, it has awarded billions of dollars of research grants since its founding in 2006. And on January 12, 2021, just a few days before Andrew Hill torpedoed Ivermectin, Unitaid awarded another grant. It shoveled out $40 million in funding to Dr. Hill’s other paymasters, the University of Liverpool for a “long-acting medicines centre.” 

Millions of families have had to bury a loved one because a cheap, safe, therapeutic drug called Ivermectin was denied to them. Instead, we had to become human guinea pigs for experimental gene therapy so Big Pharma can reap huge profits from guaranteed government contracts with zero liability for vaccine-related side-effects and deaths. 

One of the most galling facts about this entire episode is that we all know, perfectly well, what the Andrew Hills and Anthony Faucis would do if someone they loved or valued came down with COVID. After all, Hill himself admitted that if his 58-year-old brother came down with COVID he would give him Ivermectin.

They know it works. That’s why hundreds of Congressmen and their staffers have taken it. And that’s why Joe Rogan and Aaron Rodgers have taken it.  

But don’t you dare ask your doctor for it. He’ll tell you it’s a horse de-wormer.

Russian allegations that U.S. built biolab in Ukraine found to be valid: Report Sunday, March 13, 2022 by: JD Heyes

(Natural News) The news coming out of Ukraine regarding Russia’s invasion has often been sketchy and even unreliable, which is nothing new given Western media’s penchant for literally politicizing everything, including war.

The American media is no different, of course, and in fact, one could argue that most left-wing U.S. outlets are literally nothing more than propaganda sources for whatever interests the current Democrat-controlled regime embraces.

So it should come as no surprise that the regime media immediately downplayed initial reports that the United States, during the latter years of the George W. Bush administration and with bipartisan assistance from the late Sen. Richard Lugar (R-Ind.) and then-Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), built a biolab in Ukraine designed to handle dangerous substances.

Earlier this week, “a spokeswoman for the Russian Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova, claimed that Moscow has uncovered evidence of a U.S.-backed bioweapons program in Ukraine that includes the development of plague and anthrax,” The Western Journal reported.

“Recently found documents show that components of biological weapons were made in Ukraine’s laboratories, with funding from [the U.S. Department of Defense], in direct proximity to Russia,” a tweet from the U.K.’s Russian Embassy noted further.

Naturally, U.S. and Ukrainian officials quickly and vehemently denied the Russia allegations; after all, we’ve been conditioned to automatically distrust everything any Russian leader says.

A spokesperson for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said, “Ukraine strictly denies any such allegation,” while a Pentagon spokesperson added: “This absurd Russian misinformation is patently false.”

Got it? The masters of misinformation — the U.S. deep state —  when exposed, calls everything everyone else says ‘misinformation’ because that’s the modus operandi.

But who’s correct?

With that, China comes to mind, as The Western Journal points out, noting that “China just so happens to be the location of the lab that received funding from the U.S. in the years leading up to the pandemic and just so happened to be researching weaponized coronaviruses at the time the pandemic started.”

China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs followed up Russia’s claims by calling on the U.S. to account for all of its bioweapons research facilities globally.

“Russia has found during its military operations that the U.S. uses these facilities to conduct military plans,” spokesman Zhao Lijian said on Tuesday, according to Real Clear Politics.

“The U.S. has 336 labs in 30 countries under its control, including 26 in Ukraine alone. It should give a full account of its biological military activities at home and abroad and subject itself to multilateral verification,” the ministry then tweeted.

Now, can China be believed? After all, the Chinese Communist government has lied throughout the COVID-19 pandemic about where the virus actually came from — its Level 4 lab in Wuhan — and how it escaped. Beijing also covered up how soon the virus began to spread and allowed it to essentially escape to the world…just as then-President Donald Trump’s government was winning its trade war.

As it turns out, in this case, probably.

Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland testified this week during a Senate hearing that the government is actively working to protect Ukrainian research labs from the Russians, Real Clear Politics reported.

Nuland, an Obama regime alum who has been accused of fomenting a coup in Ukraine in 2014 and helping a neo-Nazi-loving regime take power, was asked directly by Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.): “Does Ukraine have chemical or biological weapons?”

Her answer was telling.

“Ukraine has biological research facilities which, in fact, we’re now quite concerned Russian troops, Russian forces may be seeking to gain control of, so we are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of Russian forces should they approach,” Nuland responded.

Rubio then did something typical of our ‘Beltway/Deep State first, always’ representatives: He redirected Nuland so she could implicate Russia if anything happened to the labs.

“I’m sure you’re aware that the Russian propaganda groups are already putting out there all kinds of information about how they have uncovered a plot by the Ukrainians to release biological weapons in the country, and with NATO’s coordination,” Rubio noted before asking: “If there is a biological or chemical weapon incident or attack inside of Ukraine, is there any doubt in your mind that 100 percent it would be the Russians that would be behind it?”

“There is no doubt in my mind, senator,” Nuland stated. “It is classic Russian technique to blame on the other guy what they are planning to do themselves.”

Glenn Greenwald, one of the few real investigative journalists today, caught that exchange and pointed it out.

Is Russia and/or China lying? You be the judge.

Sources include:

WesternJournal.com

NewsTarget.com

World Economic Forum wants everyone who resists Great Reset to be forced into China-style “reeducation camps” Friday, March 11, 2022 by: Ethan Huff

(Natural News) Wang Guan, a World Economic Forum (WEF) young global leader, is pushing for those who resist Klaus Schwab’s planned “Great Reset” to be thrown into communist China-style “reeducation camps.”

Similar to the ones where Uyghur Muslims are forced to live in China’s Xinjiang province, Wang’s reeducation camps would be filled with people who support things like freedom, nationalism and the right to bear arms.

Wang currently works as a chief political correspondent for a Chinese state-run media out that airs programming specifically for the United States. He is one of 112 young global leaders who was personally selected by Schwab for the role.

“The WEF has become notorious for globalist intervention around the world, including but not limited to pushing for the ‘Great Reset’ amidst COVID-19,” reported Natalie Winters for the National Pulse.

“The group seeks to abolish property ownership at its core, summarizing this objective through its controversial expression ‘you will own nothing and be happy.'”

The same media outlet where Wang was installed by Schwab to brainwash Americans also defends the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) genocide of Uyghur Muslims.

CCP putting out propaganda films promoting concentration camps as places to learn valuable life skills

In a short film put together to promote reeducation camps, Wang explained how he believes that the living conditions of Uyghur Muslims is a “success,” and that it serves the purposes of the CCP to ethnically cleanse China in this way.

“Fifty-four countries, most of them Muslim-majority states, defended China’s counter-extremism efforts in Xinjiang, commending China in its development policies there, and in ‘providing care to its Muslim citizens,'” Wang said in the video, adding, “and they probably have a point.”

The same feature also depicted survivors of these reeducation camps praising the Chinese leaders for supposedly teaching them life skills to be successful.

“We met 33-year-old artist Abulizikari Aobuli, who perfected his painting skills in the re-education center and now works in a gallery,” Wang said in the film.

“We caught up with 30-year-old Yuregul Yusan who works in the hospitality sector. We found 26-year-old Rukiya Yakup, who improved her Mandarin and now works as a real estate agent. And we met 23-year-old Halinur, who’s now a cashier at a restaurant.”

How sweet: the CCP’s concentration camps are just misunderstood technical colleges, apparently.

“According to local officials, the vast majority of the attendees picked up a skill or two, completed their training, and went home,” Wang further said in another related video, which was put out by the China Global Television Network (CGTN).

“Twenty-six-year-old Rukiya Yakup spent 10 months in the education center. While there, she perfected her Mandarin skills and studied sales. Now, she is a real estate sales agent, earning over 8,000 yuan, more than 1,100 U.S. dollars a month, way above local average income.”

The 26-year-old was then shown on screen claiming that she feels “happier” now that she endured reeducation camp in China. She also said that she is happy she learned Mandarin because she can now “receive both Han people and Uyghurs.”

“My income is considerable,” she added.

Another WEF young global leader who has been pushing an agenda publicly is “journalist” Daria Kaleniuk. As the Pulse reported about her, Kaleniuk confronted British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and demanded that NATO enter the war in Ukraine.

It would seem as though Schwab has his minions all over the world pushing different agendas all at the same time. And as we have come to expect, all of it revolves around his precious Great Reset.

More related news can be found at Genocide.news.

Sources include:

TheNationalPulse.com

NaturalNews.com

After denying existence of US bio labs in Ukraine, Biden regime warns that Russia could release the bioweapons they contain Friday, March 11, 2022 by: Lance D Johnson

(Natural News) The Biden regime has consistently denied the existence of U.S. biolabs in Ukraine. The regime’s Ministry of Propaganda (the fact-checkers) have repeatedly “debunked” the existence of these biolabs. Anyone who questioned this narrative is swiftly labeled “a tool of Putin” or a Russian disinformation source.

The truth is: The Department of Defense (DoD) built a network of biolabs across Ukraine. Victoria Nuland, the Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs testified at a Senate hearing that the biolabs do, in fact, exist. U.S. virologists are conducting experiments on highly dangerous pathogens of pandemic potential. Nuland is concerned that this research would fall into the hands of the Russians.

The intent of the biolabs is not publicized or well-known. The U.S. continues to fund gain-of-function research, weaponizing pathogens for predatory vaccine development. Suspiciously, the official U.S. embassy website recently removed important fact sheets about the construction and finances of these biolabs. Russia has convened a UN Security Council Meeting To Present Evidence of U.S. biolabs in Ukraine.

U.S. government continues to lie about DoD biolabs in Ukraine

The Washington Post, CNN and the government propaganda machine immediately sought to tamp down any more suspicion of biowarfare activity in Ukraine with the latest fact-check titled, “FACT CHECK: DoD has worked with Ukraine to ELIMINATE bioweapons left behind by the Soviet Union since 2005.” This headline sounds authoritative; however, in 2010, the U.S. government built a new level-3 biolab in Odessa, Ukraine, with much different ambitions. The high security biolab was not built to eliminate or secure old Soviet bioweapons. This lab was specifically built so virologists could research and enhance “especially dangerous pathogens” for vaccine and diagnostics development, much like the research in Wuhan, China that preceded the covid-19 scandal.

Robert Pope, the man who heads the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program at DOD, sat down for an interview right after the Russians invaded Ukraine. He warned that the labs “may hold pathogen strains left over from the Soviet bioweapons program preserved in freezers for research purposes.”

Despite the expert testimony, the White House decried that Moscow is spreading “preposterous propaganda” about the existence of U.S. biolabs in Ukraine. Biden’s press secretary, Jen Psaki, was quick to do damage control and blame Russia. “Russia has a history also of inventing outright lies like this, which is the suggestion that the United States has a chemical and biological weapons program, or Ukraine does, that they’re operating. Russia is the one, is the country that has a chemical and biological weapons program. So, the objective was to make clear the inaccuracy of the information, the misinformation they’re trying to put out, and make clear to the world that they not only have the capacity, they have a history of using chemical and biological weapons, and that, in this moment, we should have our eyes open.”

In other words, the upcoming bioweapons release “the next one that will get attention this time,” will be blamed on Russia.

Next bioweapon release, forced vaccine program, worldwide lock down to be blamed on Russia

Russia is currently accusing the U.S. of “experimenting with bat coronavirus samples” and carrying out anthrax research in Ukraine. Russia’s Defense Ministry spokesman, Igor Konashenkov, claimed, “the purpose of this — and other Pentagon-funded biological research in Ukraine — was to establish a mechanism for the stealthy spread of deadly pathogens.” Konashenkov claims the U.S. is conducting biological activities on birds, bats, reptiles, coronaviruses, African swine fever, Plague, tularemia, cholera and anthrax. This isn’t Russia’s first accusation of U.S.-led biowarfare in Ukraine. In 2018, Russia accused the U.S. of conducting biological experiments in Georgia, a former territory of the Soviet republic that was on its way to joining NATO and the European Union.

Meanwhile, Biden’s only defense to all these accusations is to claim that Putin “could” use chemical or biological weapons using a “false flag” event to justify their use. Will Russia be the scapegoat for the next global pandemic, lockdowns and forced vaccine/bioweapons programs? The World Health Organization (WHO) is currently calling for “new global public health world order,” including a treaty that would confine all nations to medical martial law and a totalitarian bio-security state.

While Russia certainly has the means and capability to lie to the public and use biological weapons of their own, it is the U.S. governments’ outright lies and obfuscation about the U.S. biolabs in Ukraine that are most troubling. Why aren’t we allowed to ask questions about this network of biolabs in Ukraine? Why are Americans considered spreaders of disinformation for bringing up this suspicious fact? Why is the U.S. blaming Russia for impending biological and chemical warfare? What are the Marxists within the U.S. government trying to hide?

On the flip-side, does Russia seek to seize these biowarfare assets in Ukraine and use them as evidence against the United States/WHO, or is Russia simply seeking to capture these bioweapons and use them against the world – something that the White House suggests is to come? Is Russia truly on a mission to eliminate dangerous biologics research and expose these predatory vaccine programs? Russia has their own biolabs at the State Centre for Research on Virology and Biotechnology in Novosibirsk Oblast, so it’s hard to believe that Russian researchers would be morally superior in this global escalation of bio-terror and human exploitation.

It’s also hard to believe the U.S. government when they repeatedly lie about bioweapons research in Wuhan, China, that was funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health. It’s hard to believe the U.S. government when they continuously assault American freedoms, threaten lives, civil liberties, careers, while forcing dangerous bioweapon vaccines onto the population. At the very least, the world is waking up to the threats of this unethical field of biowarfare, the rising biosecurity state, predatory vaccine development, pharmaceutical racketeering, the Great Reset and total population control.

Sources include:

DailyMail.co.uk

Foxnews.com

Do Not Trust COVID Home Tests JoelSHirschhorn

Like many others, I worked hard to get a big supply of rapid COVID home test kits, mostly free from my county and the federal government. But so far, I never used any because neither my wife nor I had any symptoms. But millions of Americans surely fell into the trap of thinking it wise to use the tests regularly to feel safe with a negative result. This is what we should understand: Testing millions of healthy people on a large-scale basis won’t help anyone. These home tests have not effectively stopped COVID transmission and deaths.

Many millions of these rapid antigen tests at a cost of billions of dollars are now in most homes. The federal government and many local organizations have been making them available without charge. But newly published research from the United Kingdom sheds a very dark shadow on their usefulness. The initial hope was that making rapid home tests widely available would help curb COVID transmission and probably some officials thought they would motivate more people to get COVID vaccine shots if people tested positive.

Subscribe to the Trialsitenews "SARS-CoV-2" Channel

No spam - we promise

The other perhaps bigger hope was that if people tested negative, they could feel safe that they did not have COVID infection and could lead normal lives. They would not be transmitting the virus. This was especially the hope if people did not have symptoms. They would be home free. And with lots of free home test kits widely available people could test frequently to keep feeling safe for themselves and others.

Now, with the U.K. research, that bubble has burst.

Here are the key findings of the research.

Somewhere between 20 percent to 80 percent of the tests would be false negatives. That means that in those cases people really were infected with the COVID virus. Many of these people might even have some symptoms. But if they get a negative test result then they believe they are not infected. Then the key question is whether they will transmit the virus and infect others and, possibly, become seriously ill.

On the other hand, if the home test is positive then the probability is very high that the result is correct. Positive test results are true positives, but negative results are likely incorrect. That is a very disappointing truth.

If people get a positive result, they can get a PCR test to confirm and then seek medical attention.

But if people get a negative home test result, then they are unlikely to get a more accurate PCR test.

The core science issue is that the home tests may not respond accurately to relatively low viral loads while the PCR test is much more sensitive and able to detect low viral loads.

The truth is that even low viral loads can still produce transmission and may lead to severe symptoms. In other words, the hope that the simple and fast home tests could confidently rule out COVID disease has been dashed by the new research. This is especially important for relatively high numbers of asymptomatic infected people.

Here is the truth that the public needs to hear from the public health system. If the home test is positive, it definitely is an accurate test. But if it’s negative, and you’re still concerned, then you need to follow up with a PCR test. Here is the ugly scenario now that millions of these home tests have been distributed: If people routinely test two or three or four times a week and get negative results and they’re asymptomatic, then the whole scheme is a waste of time. Viral transmission may still be occurring. And those billions of dollars spent on home test kits have been an enormous waste of money as well.

The new study noted: “Allowing for the uncertainties in the results from our analyses, the proportion of people with current infection missed by the [home tests] is likely to be of public health importance, particularly in settings with greater proportions of infectious people with lower viral loads; where the tests are often being applied…. negative test results from [home tests] cannot be relied on to exclude current infection. 

Policy makers need to ensure that the public are aware of the risk of being infectious despite testing negative, and that tests are not used in situations where the consequences of false negative results are considerable.”

Here is the dilemma for people. If you do get a positive home test result, what do you do? Do you try and get a fast PCR test somewhere and perhaps get the new Pfizer pills fast enough, within a few days of initial symptoms? Or do you use one of the successful protocols long used by a number of physicians that include ivermectin?

And after spending billions of dollars on these home test kits do you think our government will now tell the truth about them?

The research article was deemed so important that the same prestigious medical journal also published a companion article commenting critically on the unnerving results from a policy and political perspective. Here are some of the key comments.

“The popularity of testing for asymptomatic people among the public has seldom borne much relationship to actual utility of the test.”

“When rapid antigen tests were introduced, we were promised they would ‘identify those who are likely to spread the disease, and when used systematically in mass testing could reduce transmissions by 90%.’ Yet despite the UK spending more than £7bn [over $9 billion] on [home tests] since mid-2020, the lack of hard evidence on this promised impact is striking.”

“International comparisons are complex and influenced by many factors, but Japan, which has actively limited widespread self-testing, has a covid-19 death rate an order of magnitude less than that of the UK, Germany, where testing of asymptomatic people has been a feature, and the USA.”

“When the high cost to low benefit ratio is pointed out, we are told that more screening is needed, or that the tests are ‘transformational’ and ‘a part of daily life.’ Everyday use of tests may indeed be transformational for those with a stake in the testing industry, but the financial burden is borne by taxpayers.”

“Messages to the public about the reliability of these tests, and about whether, when, and how to self-test are mixed and ever changing.”

“Surely it is time to start afresh. Publication of this new paper should prompt the [government] to reassess its authorisations of rapid antigen tests in asymptomatic people. The public deserves to have better evaluations, ensuring good test performance in real life settings, and a policy that specifies effective and efficient test use for carefully targeted purposes.”

Now that you know the truth, your use of home test kits can become smarter and more useful.

Dr. Joel S. Hirschhorn, author of Pandemic Blunder and many articles and podcasts on the pandemic, worked on health issues for decades, and his Pandemic Blunder Newsletter is on Substack. As a full professor at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, he directed a medical research program between the colleges of engineering and medicine. As a senior official at the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment and the National Governors Association, he directed major studies on health-related subjects; he testified at over 50 US Senate and House hearings and authored hundreds of articles and op-ed articles in major newspapers. He has served as an executive volunteer at a major hospital for more than 10 years. He is a member of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, and America’s Frontline Doctors.

Deep state neocon admits that Ukraine has “biological research facilities,” sets stage for false flag to be blamed on Russia Thursday, March 10, 2022 by: Ethan Huff

(Natural News) The powers that be are finally admitting that the United States is running biological weapons facilities in Ukraine that are among the likely targets of the Russian invasion. But as we have come to expect, the military-industrial complex talking heads are already preemptively blaming Russia for a potential impending false flag attack.

Neoconservative deep state hack Victoria Nuland, who holds the title of Undersecretary of State under Joe Biden, told Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and other members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee the other day that the Pentagon does, in fact, own and operate bioweapons laboratories in Ukraine. The corporate-controlled media, as you probably noticed, had been saying that this claim is a wild “conspiracy theory.”

Nuland set the record straight, however, she also spun the narrative to imply that Russian President Vladimir Putin might be trying to take over these facilities in order to release their biological weapons as part of a large-scale attack on the West. Rubio pressed Nuland on this matter and got her to verbally agree to this narrative.

While it certainly could be the case that Putin is the madman that the deep state and its media propagandists want us to believe he is, it could also be the case that they are using him as a scapegoat for their own planned false flag attack. All they would have to do is launch one, blame it on Putin, and watch as the next phase of their agenda manifests.

“The U.S. has 336 labs in 30 countries under its control, including 26 in Ukraine alone,” announced Chinese Foreign Ministry earlier this month.

Russia’s Foreign Ministry issued a similar statement:

“Russia obtained documents proving that Ukrainian biological laboratories located near Russian borders worked on development of components of biological weapons.”

Marco Rubio is a deep state neocon hack

According to Glenn Greenwald, formerly of The Intercept, Russia and China’s claims deserve the same level of skepticism as Nuland and Rubio’s claims. Remind us again what makes our own government any more trustworthy than those governments?

U.S. “fact checkers,” Greenwald points out, reflexively defaulted to siding with the Pentagon (Pentagram) on this matter, accusing anyone who denies the official story of being a QAnon conspiracy theorist. But the evidence seems to point more towards wrongdoing by the military-industrial complex as opposed to the Kremlin.

“Nuland did something completely uncharacteristic for her, for neocons, and for senior U.S. foreign policy officials: for some reason, she told a version of the truth,” Greenwald points out.

“Her answer visibly stunned Rubio, who – as soon as he realized the damage she was doing to the U.S. messaging campaign by telling the truth – interrupted her and demanded that she instead affirm that if a biological attack were to occur, everyone should be ‘100% sure’ that it was Russia who did it. Grateful for the life raft, Nuland told Rubio he was right.”

Unfortunately for Rubio, who is not looking too healthy these days, the cat was already out of the bag. Nuland let it out that Ukraine does, in fact, possess “chemical or biological weapons” – you know, the same types that we were told justified an invasion and takeover of Iraq during the George W. Bush years.

“Nuland’s bizarre admission that ‘Ukraine has biological research facilities’ that are dangerous enough to warrant concern that they could fall into Russian hands ironically constituted more decisive evidence of the existence of such programs in Ukraine than what was offered in 2002 and 2003 to corroborate U.S. allegations about Saddam’s chemical and biological programs in Iraq,” Greenwald says.

More related news can be found at WWIII.news.

Sources for this article include:

Greenwald.substack.com

NaturalNews.com