Israel Reports Side Effects of Pfizer Vaccine and is Ignored by the Pharmaceutical Company

Israel has been, to a certain degree, the petri dish for the worldwide covid pandemic. It was the first country to fully vaccinate its population and is now dealing with the aftermath. An Israeli doctor alleges he told Pfizer about the incidents of myocarditis in some of his vaccinated patients, the pharmaceutical company ignored his findings for four months.

Dr. Dror Mevorach is the head of internal medicine at Hadassah University Hospital in Ein Kerem. After the rollout of the Pfizer vaccine in Israel a young man showed up in Mevorach’s office with myocarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle, literally one day after receiving the Pfizer shot. Mevorach then found two more cases of the heart ailment in his hospital with newly vaccinated individuals. The doctor notified the Israeli Ministry of Health who told Mevorach to start an investigation. Within two months Mevorach and a team of doctors found and logged “over one hundred cases”.

The doctor describes a “gut feeling” he had, after the discovery of the first case, that the heart ailment was a side effect of the Pfizer shot. The Ministry told Mevorach to assemble a group of doctors and study the effects of the vaccine. Israel keeps a nationwide surveillance system administered by The Ministry of Health. This allowed Mevorach and his group to monitor patients who had taken the Pfizer vaccine. The group found a higher instance of myocarditis in young men after getting the shot. In their study over four hundred thousand people were vaccinated.  Approximately half of them were male. The study found a higher risk of myocarditis in “adolescent” males after the second shot was 1 case per 12,361. In “adolescent” females it was 1 case per 144,439.

Dr. Mevorach informed Pfizer of the study and, he says, the drug company didn’t believe him for four months. The pharmaceutical company finally accepted Mevorach’s conclusions only after the group reported on all the cases in Israel, analyzed the data, and were able to statistically prove myocarditis doubled after getting the Pfizer shot.

Subscribe to the Trialsitenews "COVID-19" Channel

No spam - we promise

Mevorach and his group published their findings in the New England Journal of Medicine. The group discovered another side effect of the Pfizer shot is paresthesia, a partial paralysis of facial muscles. The Israeli Ministry of Health found other minor ramifications of the shot including a delay in women’s menstrual cycle. Because Israel was the first country to fully vaccinate its population and keep track of the administration of the shot through its database, the Jewish State is also the first country to keep track of the vaccine’s side effects. To date, the Israeli Health Ministry has logged a series of “possible side effects” beside myocarditis. These include encephalitis, blurred vision, and Guillain-Barre syndrome. Another two “possible” side effects include stroke and ventricular fibrillation which the Health Ministry says are “under investigation”,

Perhaps it’s no coincidence the Israelis just signed a deal with Novavax to buy their version of the covid vaccine. The terms of the deal were not disclosed, and it is still pending approval, but the Novavax shot doesn’t use the same mRNA technology as Pfizer.

Dr. Dror Mevorach’s study may be an indication of the future. Pfizer’s representation of their covid vaccine has been under some scrutiny. Pfizer is now being forced to release more data due to a court order.

Mexican Institute of Social Security Large Observational Study: Home Treatment Kit with Ivermectin Reduces Hospitalizations & Death

This large retrospective observational population study out of Mexico is a testament to the benefits of treating mild outpatient Covid-19 cases with a medical kit at home. They found that the incidence of hospitalization was only 6.14% in patients who received a kit and 11.71% in those who did not. In the multivariate model, receiving a medical kit was associated with a lower risk of hospitalization or death from COVID-19: adjusted risk ratio 0.35 (95% confidence interval 0.30–0.40).

Background

This retrospective, two-group comparative study was sponsored by the Mexican Institute of Social Security (Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, (IMSS), a system providing healthcare to about 68 million people or 54% of the Mexican population. Operating approximately 1,400 primary care medical units, 270 general community hospitals, and 25 tertiary and quaternary care medical centers distributed throughout the 32 Mexican states.

During the pandemic, IMSS implemented respiratory care modules in a bid to classify and care for COVID-19 patients.  For the cohort of patients with mild COVID-19 without respiratory symptoms, a large study was set up comparing a group that received the treatment kit with those that did not.

The treatment kits included an information brochure, face masks, a pulse oximeter, a three-day course of azithromycin (500 mg on day 1, 250 mg on days 2 and 3), a two-day course of ivermectin 6 mg daily, and several acetaminophen and aspirin tablets. The ivermectin and aspirin are likely to be what provided the benefits. The ivermectin dosing was much too low, but still probably helped. The aspirin would help prevent the microthrombosis that is so prevalent in Covid-19. Many believe microthrombosis is the main driver of severe disease in Covid-19. There is also evidence that platelet agglutination is the initial stage of the thrombosis in Covid-19.

The study team included a total of 28,048 laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 patients: 7,898 (28.2%) received a medical kit and 20,150 (71.8%) did not. The incidence rates of hospitalization and death combined were calculated.

The Study Methods

This study was designed to investigate the hospitalization and mortality rates of a large sample of adults who received the primary treatment kit in comparison with an equally large cohort of patients who declined the kit yet continued monitoring via telehealth.

A retrospective, two-group comparative study was conducted with secondary data via the National Family Medicine Information System of the IMSS. This database contains the personal and clinical records of every patient, including their diagnosis and prescribed medications. All data is captured in real-time by the family physician while attending to the patient.

A second database was set up by the epidemiological surveillance system at the IMSS covering the period of February 1-May 16, 2021. The data corresponded to ambulatory patients aged 18 years and older and over with confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis and with information about the treatment kit delivery only. Records from the second epidemic wave from January 1–August 30, 2021, were analyzed. The study team included data regarding sex, age, medical conditions (e.g., obesity, hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease), follow-up by telephone, and whether they agreed to use the treatment kit was obtained for each patient, as well emergency room visits and hospitalization. Information regarding death was obtained and verified using the hospital and mortality registries.

Results

The study authors, led by Cesar Raul Gonzalez-Bonilla, Evidence Analysis and Synthesis Research Unit, Health Research Coordination, Education and Research Unit, Medical Benefits Directorate, Mexican Institute of Social Security, report that those mild COVID-19 patients receiving the home treatment kit had a hospitalization rate of 6.14% as compared to the cohort not receiving the home treatment kit at 11.71%.

As is the case in other parts of North America, the authors report that comorbidities (e.g., obesity, diabetes, etc.) are associated with an increased risk of hospitalization or death. But those rates were reduced in the cohort that received early treatment or telephone follow-up.

Multivariate analysis revealed that the home-based mild COVID-19 patients receiving the home treatment kits were associated with a lower risk of hospitalization and death from COVID-19 with an adjusted risk ratio of 0.35 (95% confidence interval 0.30–0.40).

Summary

The authors conclude that a multimodal strategy of the type employed in Mexico could possibly reduce the risk of hospitalization and death in adult outpatients with mild COVID-19. Based on a review of dozens of randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and countless physician interviews, the study results here indicate that even a marginally efficacious inexpensive regimen can save lives, even when administered early. TrialSite goes on record that sending patients home with no treatment and only instructions to go to the emergency department if/when they become hypoxic was cruel and immoral. It also directly caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans.

Lead Research/Investigator

Cesar Raul Gonzalez-Bonilla, Ph.D. Evidence Analysis and Synthesis Research Unit, Health Research Coordination, Education and Research Unit, Medical Benefits Directorate, Mexican Institute of Social Security.

BREAKER 19: Convoy of Patriots Rocks Canada Written by Michael J. Matt | Editor

New from Remnant TV...

BOMBSHELL! Vintage footage of Klaus Schwab bragging that Canadian PM Justin Trudeau was once one of the World Economic Forum's "Young Global Leaders" as were, according to Schwab, half of Trudeau's cabinet right now. This explains everything!

In this special edition of The Remnant Underground, Michael Matt puts the massive freedom convoy taking place north of the border this weekend into context, as it becomes an international symbol of freedom and lockdown fatigue worldwide.

As the PM of Denmark takes a page out of Boris Johnson’s playbook and lifts all mandates in Denmark, Michael speaks to the possibility that the globalist narrative is running out of diesel fuel. And if that happens, The Great Reset is DOA.

Standing with the truckers, Michael returns to his mantra—Resistance Is Not Futile—as he pledges prayers and best wishes to Canadian freedom fighters.

Don’t miss it! Near the end of this episode, Michael offers a heartfelt montage of Canadian children thanking the truckers for standing for them, which more or less says it all. This one actually is “for the children,” so let those truckers roll, 10-4!

https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/articles/item/5825-breaker-19-convoy-of-patriots-rocks-canada

How Children’s Strong Immunity May Save Us From COVID TrialSite Staff January 28, 2022

A series of studies investigating the low incidence of infections, severe illness, and deaths among children exposed to COVID has underscored how strikingly different human immunological defenses are at different life stages.

Research papers from across the world have illumined how children’s different cellular composition, interferon production, ACE-2 receptor function, T-cell responses, and other biological features guard against coronavirus.

Research About Children’s Natural Immunity

The child immunity studies include papers from the Charité Medicine University in Berlin, the Universities of Heidelberg, Tübingen, Ulm, Freiburg and Leipzig, and Nature. Dozens of international studies – from England to Italy, from China to the USA – provide insight into the surprisingly unique defense system of children

Collectively, the papers also suggest that children’s strong natural immunity makes their vaccination a dubious proposition and that children may provide a “generational immune barrier” which interrupts broader transmission. 

Most Children Have Been Exposed to Coronavirus

Despite their low case rates and relatively insignificant rates of fatality attributed solely to COVID infection, children have had just as much exposure to the virus as adults. After two years of the pandemic, most children in the United States have developed natural immunity through mild infections which presented either as asymptomatic or a mild cold.

This means that children already have far better defense against COVID vaccination can provide.

Children Form “Generational Immunity Barrier”

The immunity of children, a population of 73 million, could play a special role in dampening the impact of COVID as it becomes an endemic disease due to their innate protection and natural collective immunity.

This current generation of previously infected children will grow into adulthood with an increasingly adapted defense against the virus and together, will be a significant COVID-resistant population. The studies suggest these trends among children will emerge with no interference from pharmaceutical companies’ current or future COVID vaccine or booster.

How Children’s Immune Systems Defend Against COVID

A passage from one of the children’s studies is quoted as an example:

• A 2021 article called “Children’s Upper Airways Primed to Combat SARS-CoV-2 Infection,” in the medical journal MedScape said that “…New research suggests that children’s upper airway epithelial and immune cells are preactivated and primed to recognize SARS-CoV-2 infection, resulting in a stronger early immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection than adults can contribute.”

• Numerous studies indicate show that children are significantly less at risk from COVID. The lowest risk of hospitalization is in the age group of 5-11 years. At this age there are virtually no Covid deaths without previous illnesses, with children suffering from chronic co-morbidities are exceptions.

• Children have a different cell composition in the nose and oral cavity than adults. They have many more immune cells in their mucous membranes, and they also produce more quickly type 1- interferons, which are important for fighting viruses.

• Children up to the age of 10 also have a lower number of ACE2 receptors than adults. The viruses can bind less. The number then increases from 10-11 years of age.

• Children have a broad genetic spectrum of defenses in their “T” and “B” memory cells. They are able to store a large number of viral genetic sequences for years.

• Children’s Spike-specific T cell responses were more than twice as high as in adults.

The Role of Naturally Acquired Immunity

Overall, the role of naturally acquired immunity to coronaviruses is increasingly coming to the fore in international government assessments. Scores of studies show natural immunity’s superiority compared with immunity conferred by mRNA vaccines in terms of range and durability. This applies to both recovered adults and children with and without symptoms from the infection.

Omicron: A Highly Contagious Less Dangerous Agent for Natural Immunity

Omicron is now asserting against the first lines of defense of a child’s immune system. However, high incidence dates do not mean an excess of diseases or mortality. The latest data from the U.K. show infection rates are highest in babies and kids up to 6 years old, but the daily average of child Omicron-cases in hospitals is less than 100 in England, compared to four million children under five years old, alone.

Of hospitalized child COVID cases, government experts said that most them were admitted for other diseases and incidentally tested positive for Omicron. In 5- 11 years, the hospitalization is near zero. No COVID-associated deaths have been recorded for people under 24 years old.

Pfizer Pediatric Vaccine Mostly Ineffective Against Omicron

In view of the rapid dominance of the Omicron variant, the benefit of serial vaccination of children aged 5-11 years with the Pfizer BioNTech pediatric dose is near zero. Europe’s weekly update shows the same trend as Canada, the United Kingdom, the United States, Scotland, Denmark, and South Africa: Omicron does not prevent infection in adults. And while double or triple vaccinated adults might initially avoid serious illness, efficacy wanes after 4 or 5 months. 

But children 5 -11 years have the lowest risk of hospitalization of all age groups and virtually no Covid-mortality. Children are also less likely to transmit the virus because of their rapid and effective immune defense. Infected adults infect five other people on average, while children infect only one other person. And COVID vaccines, overall, have been proven to be ill-suited for preventing infection. 

Risks Vs. Benefits of Vaccinating Children

In light of children’s strong immunity to COVID, policymakers and parents should think about the risks involved in dosing them with experimental mRNA vaccines. These drugs have been shown to cause adverse events in young people so the risk for them is different than for older people who stand to gain more benefits from vaccination. It is also unknown how vaccinating children might impact their durable, broad natural immunity which acts as a personal shield against illness, but which may also become a population-wide generational defense.

People on Twitter are saying they regret taking the COVID-19 vaccines 01/27/2022 / By Mary Villareal

More and more people are going on Twitter to express their regrets about taking the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines, many as far back as July 2021. A simple search on the microblogging platform would lead to thousands of results from people who wished they had never taken the experimental jabs.

“I thought I was getting back to 100% but clearly not. Do I regret taking the vaccine? Yes, and fuck you if you think that’s wrong,” said one user.

“I think I regret taking the vaccine because the side effects have refused to wear off,” another stated.

Plenty of people expressed different reasons for their regrets, with one saying that the side effects of the vaccine refused to wear off after seven months.

The testimonials and expressions made on Twitter contradict that of the mainstream media, which censored the fact that people are being fed up with the vaccinations, only to find that they have been bamboozled by their government’s false promises of freedom from the pandemic. (Related: Woman expresses regret after J&J covid vaccine triggers potentially deadly blood clots in her lungs, stomach and brain.)

Rock and Roll Hall of Famer expresses regret in interview

Even Rock and Roll Hall of Famer Eric Clapton claimed that he was duped into getting the COVID vaccine through subliminal messaging on YouTube. He claimed that even though he is vaccinated, he regretted his decision after he suffered “disastrous” side effects.

Clapton claimed that he suffered a “severe reaction” to the AstraZeneca vaccine last spring. He said that his hands and feet were either frozen, numb or burning and that he was pretty much useless for two weeks. “I feared I would never play again, but the propaganda said the vaccine was safe for everyone.”

In a new interview, Clapton said that despite his skepticism, he was led to believe that it was right to get vaccinated, adding that some of his friends and family were “scared” of him getting the dose.

“[Belgian psychologist] Mattias Desmet talked about it — the theory of mass formation hypnosis. I could see it then. Once I kind of started to look for it, I saw it everywhere,” he said about the situation.

Desmet’s theory came into traction in December 2021, when vaccine scientist Robert Malone appeared on the Joe Rogan Experience Podcast. The theory posits that the masses have been hypnotized into a state that allowed them to be pushed into vaccine acceptance.

Clapton described how he was pushed into getting the vaccine. “I remember seeing little things on YouTube, which were like subliminal advertising. Things like, ‘You own nothing and you’ll be happy,’ and I thought, ‘What does that mean?’ Bit by bit, I put a rough jigsaw puzzle together. That made me even more resolute.”

He also noted that he is now taking a more critical view of news media, saying that while they used to be an impartial commentary on world affairs, they have now become one-way traffic focused on following orders.

This shift did not sit well with Clapton and has motivated him creatively. “These guys in power really started to piss me [off]. I have a tool and a calling and I can make use of that,” he said.

Clapton recorded an anti-lockdown single, Stand and Deliver, together with fellow British singer Van Morrison in 2020, and recorded his solo track This Has Gotta Stop, as well. He said that since his career is almost gone and it’s been long since he played live, he’s forcibly retired by the time he spoke out against vaccines anyway.

Last fall, Clapton also donated £1,000 to British rockers Jam For Freedom to help pay for legal fees that have been incurred after “breaching COVID regulations” at a live show. He then went on to say that he will not play in venues that required proof of vaccination.

More related stories:

Vaccine Remorse hits America

Volunteer experienced severe 103 F fever after receiving experimental coronavirus vaccine

Professor receives grant for vaccine study, then warns the public against that very same vaccine

Vaccine-induced “herd immunity” DOES NOT EXIST: German government admits that 95% of omicron cases are in fully vaccinated individuals

TICK TOCK, DOC: Vaccine-pushing doctors “dropping like flies” after getting covid jabbed

Watch the video below for more stories about vaccine regret:

Fully Vaccinated Olympic Gold Medalist “Dies of Covid”, Reports Mainstream Media BY CAPTAINDARETOFLY ON JANUARY 28, 2022

Sky News was revealed to be meddling with the truth about Olympic gold medalist Szilveszter Csollany, who recently died post-Covid-19 vaccination.

The 51-year-old Hungarian, who was the rings champion in the 2020 Sydney Olympics, was admitted to the hospital in December 2021 after supposedly expressing “anti-vaccination views on social media.”

After Csollany later died after many weeks on a ventilator in the ICU, Sky News and other big mainstream media outlets took the opportunity to blame the Olympic champion’s death on his refusal to get vaccinated. However, the only problem is that Csollany did get the jab because he had no other choice if he wanted to continue his career.

Despite having reservations about getting vaccinated, the champion was forced to get vaccinated or lose his career. Tragically, Csollany passed away shortly after getting the jab.

Infowars reported: “Sky News decided not to include this pretty crucial fact in either the headline or on their front page, which merely stated ‘anti-vax Olympic gold medalist dies of coronavirus,’ again suggesting his failure to get vaccinated was a factor in his death.”

It’s worth noting that this isn’t the first time that the mainstream media has lied about the pandemic and pointed blame towards anyone who refuses to get vaccinated.

Sky News has been particularly frequent with their lies ever since the beginning, such as their reporting of the so-called “climate lockdown” in India.

A Sky News broadcaster claimed at the time that the idea of a climate lockdown was fake news invented by “conspiracy theorist” covid deniers, even as an actual climate lockdown was simultaneously being announced in India.

One of the worst lies that the mainstream media has touted throughout the pandemic is the safety of vaccines. To encourage more people to get the experimental jab, they love to report that the injections are completely “safe” and “effective” whilst completely ignoring the countless numbers of people who have been left injured or who have died post-vaccination.

Csollany’s death is tragic and sadly could have been avoided if he had refused to get vaccinated, yet it is another case where blackmail and the threat of job loss are simply too much.

The Exposé is now censored by
Google, Facebook, Twitter & PayPal
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuse to…

We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead we rely solely on your support, so
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism.
It’s quick and easy…

The greatest rebranding campaign of all-time is why the flu has all but disappeared in 2020-21 April 13, 2021 TheCOVIDBlog.com

ATLANTA — Rebranding is a marketing strategy that facilitates name and image changes for companies, products and/or services. We wrote last week about AstraZeneca. The company hopes to save its blood clotting, lethal injection product by rebranding and changing the name to Vaxzevria. This blog will always remind readers that Vaxzevria equals AstraZeneca and will not allow the name change to bury the carnage AstraZeneca is causing. But until 2020, rebranding a disease was unheard of.

Influenza, aka “the flu,” infected 35 million Americans in 2018-19, according to the Centers For Disease Control. Those numbers included 491,000 hospitalizations and 34,200 deaths. The 2017-18 flu season featured 45 million infections, 810,000 hospitalizations and 61,000 deaths. The CDC estimated upwards of 56 million illnesses, 740,000 hospitalizations and 62,000 deaths for the 2019-20 flu season.

The 2020-21 flu season reminds us of the 1980 Winter Olympics when the United States hockey team upset the heavily-favored, four-time defending champion Soviet Union at Lake Placid.

Al Michaels is unlikely to reprise the most famous line in sports broadcast history for what happened with influenza in 2021. But the miraculous disappearance of the flu needs a similar slogan in these surreal times.

Flu season 2020-21

The headlines are incredible. ABC13 in Toledo, Ohio reported on January 25 that only two people had been hospitalized with the flu so far this season. That number was 205 people at the same time in 2020. NBC News 9 in Denver reported on Sunday that only 30 people had been hospitalized with the flu in the entire state of Colorado in the 2020-21 season. The entire state of Pennsylvania has reported 41 flu hospitalizations and 17 deaths for the entire 2020-21 flu season.

The CDC is reporting a total of 1,710 total flu infections in the United States from September 27, 2020 to April 3, 2021.

Meanwhile the CDC is reporting over 31 million “COVID-19” cases in the United States since the disease started in March 2020. Or shall we say, since the rebranding campaign began.

Coincidentally or otherwise, total COVID-19 cases are in line with total flu cases prior to the so-called pandemic. COVID-19 death numbers are obviously higher than all flu seasons. But the CDC is not only a marketing agency for big pharmaceutical companies, but also is less than honest about COVID-19 death numbers.

What happened to the flu?

Mainstream media and big tech companies regurgitate a well-coordinated narrative. The Harvard School of Public Health said masks and social distancing are the reasons for low flu numbers. A February WebMD article repeated these sentiments, while adding flu vaccines as another mitigating factor. Of course it’s been long admitted and proven that COVID-19 shots do not stop the spread of COVID-19. The most humorous explanation for the flu’s disappearance comes from AP Medical Writer Mike Stobbe. He wrote in February that COVID-19 “muscled aside flu and other bugs.”

Thus the general consensus among mainstream voices is that flu cases are virtually nonexistent because everyone is wearing masks and social distancing. At the same time, mainstream voices say COVID-19 cases are high because nobody is wearing masks. The circle-jerk is perpetual. But simple statistics show the fallacious and intelligence-insulting nature of the foregoing premises.

Texas ended its mask mandate on March 10. Three weeks later, the state reported record-low COVID-19 infections and hospitalizations. Mississippi also experienced record-low COVID-19 infections and hospitalization after lifting its mask mandate.

RELATED: Truth About Masks (The COVID Blog)

Dr. Doom, aka Anthony Fauci, said the situations in Texas and Mississippi are “confusing.” He said he hopes cases keep going down without masks, social distancing, etc. But of course he could not resist spewing more doom and gloom thereafter.

You can also simply look at data before and after mask mandates.

Mainstream media, the World Health Organization (WHO), et al. were practically rooting for mass COVID-19 deaths on the African continent. French doctors even suggested using the African continent as a mass clinical trial for experimental shots.

But mass deaths never came to fruition on the Continent despite some countries completely shunning lockdowns, masks and other measures.

In sum, the CDC, Fauci, et al. want you to believe that masks and social distancing stop the flu. But they do not stop this extinction-level virus called COVID-19. They rely on mass gullibility and acquiescence to execute these agendas.

Influenza rebranded to COVID-19

Rebranding has several purposes. Some companies need to escape bad publicity. Others simply need a makeover to keep up with market trends. But the bottom line for all rebranding campaigns is money. That is no different for the flu-to-COVID-19 rebranding campaign.

The global flu vaccine market was worth $4 billion total in 2015. That is a paltry sum compared to what COVID-19 shots will generate. CNN Business projects that Pfizer and Moderna will generate $32 billion from experiment shots in 2021 alone. Johnson & Johnson (Janssen Pharmaceuticals) is expected to generate $10 billion from its shots in 2021.

It makes perfect business sense for the CDC, WHO, et al. to censor the proven effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin against COVID-19. Both drugs are long past patent/exclusive distribution years. Thus any company can make them and drive prices down to pennies. “COVID-19” sounds far more ominous and sinister than “the flu.” The unknowns and mass fearmongering campaigns for the new brand also drive sales. It worked, is working and will continue to work.

Flu is gone forever, COVID here to stay

The flu was not eradicated. It is still here and always will be here. Thus “COVID-19” will always be here. Government and media will also continue their fearmongering campaigns in perpetuity because there will always be flu seasons and people getting sick during those times. Except now flu is called “COVID-19.”

Unfortunately there is nothing we can really do about this. A vast majority of Americans will be injected with experimental shots by the end of this year. These individuals are forever condemned to confirmation bias since they cannot reverse their choices to get injected. They are also likely condemned to a short life of strange illnesses, episodes, etc. All you can do is stay vigilant and continue spreading truth to the best of your ability.