Washington State legalized “flesh goo” liquefaction of human corpses before activating COVID concentration camps that will target unvaxxed conservatives with “strike team” operations…

The State of Washington legalized the liquefaction and disposal of human corpses  just one year before the state activated covid concentration camps, providing for an efficient, stealth mechanism for mass disposal of human corpses.

This is a fact. No one can shoot this down with a fake “fact check,” so they simply try to censor the conversation and hope no one is paying attention.

Washington’s legalization of this “flesh goo” mechanism for liquefying human corpses — known as “alkaline hydrolysis” — went into effect on May 1, 2020. The law is RCW 68.50.110 and the passage refers to “alkaline hydrolysis” as the new, legal means to dispose of human corpses.

In just the last two years, there has been an aggressive push by several US states to legalize this corpse disposal process, which uses lye (caustic soda) mixed with water to dissolve human bodies into a “flesh goo” which is then flushed into the municipal sewage system. To date, 20 US states have legalized this process. Those states, as documented by Nolo.com, include Oregon, California, Illinois, Minnesota, Nevada and many others.

Once the “flesh goo” is flushed into the sewers, it is collected as “biosludge” and distributed on orchards and food farms where it is claimed to be a source of “free fertilizer” for farmers. In America today, governments are quite literally dissolving dead human corpses and spreading the flesh goo on food farms to feed the living.

This practice of biosludge is documented in my earlier film Biosludged which is available on Brighteon.com as well as a free download from Biosludged.com. The film interviews Dr. David Lewis, former EPA scientist and author of “Science For Sale.” Dr. Lewis blew the whistle on this practice years ago and saw his career destroyed by the EPA.

Dr. David Lewis warned in the film that this practice of biosludge distribution on food farms could be used to distribute biological weapons and carry out a nationwide bioterrorism attack on America. Deadly viruses are deliberately spread on food crops with the help of cities via the biosludge process, and all a terrorist needs to do is flush biological weapons down the toilet to make this happen. The city does all the work!

And here’s the full documentary via Brighteon Films:

Brighteon.com/39fe228d-398e-4d6f-bdfa-22d019f737b0

You can download the entire movie from Biosludged.com and post it to your own channels or platforms, by the way.

Washington State legalizes the liquefaction of human corpses, then launches covid concentration camps with “strike team” operations

The legalization of “flesh goo” human liquefaction practices has accelerated after the creation of the Biosludged film. In 2020, after the covid pandemic exploded, Washington State legalized the practice as it began the launch its plans to build covid concentration camps run by “strike team” operators.

Natural News covered the story in September of 2021, documenting Gov. Inslee’s regime efforts to publicly advertise for “strike team” job positions as they were staffing up the covid concentration camps. Here’s a screen shot of the GovernmentJobs.com help wanted listing:

Earlier last year, in July of 2021, the White House (Jen Psaki) publicly announced that “strike forces” would be unleashed into communities across America to enforce vaccine coercion programs. Here’s the video of her saying this during a White House press briefing:

Now, confirming the covid concentration camp / strike team plan, Washington State legislators filed a bill (WAC 246-100-040) which would legalize the medical kidnapping of Americans (at gunpoint), ripping them from their homes and depositing them as prisoners in covid concentration camps.

Although the lying, genocidal corporate media has tried to claim this is all a “conspiracy theory,” you can read the text of the proposed bill at this link on Leg.WA.gov: (emphasis ours)

(1) At his or her sole discretion, a local health officer may issue an emergency detention order causing a person or group of persons to be immediately detained for purposes of isolation or quarantine in accordance with subsection (3) of this section…

(2) A local health officer may invoke the powers of police officers, sheriffs, constables, and all other officers and employees of any political subdivisions within the jurisdiction of the health department to enforce immediately orders given to effectuate the purposes of this section in accordance with the provisions of RCW 43.20.050(4) and 70.05.120.

As The Gateway Pundit has reported, “The Washington State Board of Health may soon amend state law to authorize the involuntary detainment of residents as young as 5 years old in Covid-19 “internment camps” for failing to comply with the state’s experimental vaccine mandate.”

The proposed law clearly states that law enforcement officials may use the threat of violence to medically kidnap people who are merely suspected of being infected with something, even if they show no symptoms and haven’t tested “positive” for anything.

This is, essentially, medical martial law.

Human liquefaction is the ultimate “stealth” method to dispose of large numbers of bodies generated during government genocide

What’s obvious here is that Washington State, run by murderous left-wing Marxist criminals and tyrants who literally advocate the killing of their own human babies (i.e. abortion and infanticide), has developed a way to dispose of large masses of human bodies without having to dig mass graves or run incinerators which would be detectable by drones or satellites. By disposing of all the bodies from the covid death camps via alkaline hydrolysis, they simply turn human beings into liquid goo and flush them into the sewage system.

From there, the city’s biosludge trucks transport the liquefied human corpses as “free fertilizer” for farmers, so that the bodies of the dead are used to grow food for the living. It’s not quite Soylent Green, but it’s close.

As I explained in a podcast published yesterday, this nefarious, genocidal plan is being cooked up by radical Democrat Leftists, many of whom openly advocate for the extermination of conservatives, Christians, Trump supporters and gun owners. In fact, that’s who will be targeted by so-called “health department” officials who can simply point at any household and declare, “They might be infected!” From there, armed government goons will drag them away and deposit them in covid death camps which are connected to the municipal sewage systems to accept the flesh goo liquids.

Conservatives can be easily targeted based on their voting registration records. I’ve covered all this in yesterday’s red alert podcast:

Once the covid concentration camps start to get full, the way Leftist tyrants will make more room is to exterminate the current occupants and blame their deaths on covid.

This will perpetuate the covid pandemic narrative while eliminating the politician opposition of power-hungry Democrats who have now resoundingly demonstrated they care nothing about the rule of law, human rights, democracy or the Constitution. They are hell-bent on exterminating conservatives by any means necessary, and they have meticulously built this infrastructure to quietly, silently liquefy any number of victims and remove them from the 2022 mid-term elections, all while claiming they’re protecting “public safety.”

It’s the perfect plot for democide (mass murder by governments) and political domination.

The silent holocaust: Dead victims don’t protest against government genocide

In the 20th century alone, 262 million human beings were mass murdered by governments (Univ. of Hawaii research). History has shown that rogue, power-hungry governments will inevitably invoke mass extermination to try to maintain their power and eliminate their political opposition. The most effective way to carry that out is to make sure your intended victims have no idea they are being exterminated. If tens of thousands of conservatives in Washington State (and Oregon, California, etc.) start disappearing into covid death camps, there will be no protests and no outcry because dead people don’t protest. All the deaths will be blamed on covid, and the media will enforce the narrative that unvaccinated conservatives are all dying from covid, blaming them for their own deaths and pushing more vaccine depopulation shots.

Under this system, mass extermination can be carried out in stealth mode for an extended period of time. This how Democrats can literally carry out a modern-day holocaust with little to no push back.

We’ve also learned from watching events over the last two years that doctors, hospital administrators and even governors will gladly go along with mass murder to achieve their political goals. Former NY Gov. Cuomo, for example, ordered infected elderly to be put into nursing homes and hospital wards that would guarantee cross infection of other patients, resulting in large numbers of deaths among the elderly. This was murder by design.

Similarly, the entire cabal of Big Tech, Big Media, Big Pharma, Big Government and Big Science has colluded to deprive the American people access to ivermectin, hydroxochloroquine and other effective interventions that could have prevented as many as 85% of covid deaths. This was all done deliberately, consciously, with an end goal in mind. This proves that the very people who run our governments, hospitals and science journals are, themselves, complicit in mass murder. They acted with intent to maximize covid deaths in order to push a false narrative that would scare people into vaccine jabs.

Those “vaccines,” it turns out, aren’t even vaccines. They’re genetic therapy interventions that alter human cells and turn the human body into a bioweapons spike protein factory. They are designed to achieve depopulation. As Naomi Wolf recently said about Fauci’s gain-of-function research smoking gun documents, this is “premeditated manslaughter of millions of people, coordinated at the highest levels.”

People who would carry out these heinous acts of violence and tyranny against the human race would also liquefy their bodies and flush them down the drains. There is nothing these criminals won’t do to achieve their end game goals, which include global depopulation and the extermination of all those who might express dissent against medical totalitarianism.

Today I’ve published a special podcast that details this entire nefarious plan. Consider this a must-listen if you hope to survive the great culling that has been unleashed against humanity:

Naval SEALS & Members of Naval Special Warfare Command: Win Vaccine Injunction Against POTUS & Defense Department

U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor ruled in favor of the U.S. Navy Seals against President Joe Biden’s vaccine mandate, granting a preliminary injunction yesterday blocking the Department of Defense Department, an executive branch administrative agency, from punishing a group of Navy sailors, who rather than just succumb to the orders did what they do best—fight back and won.

The Lawsuit

Filed by a nonprofit religious freedom advocacy called First Liberty Institute, a group of troops including Navy SEALS  and members in the Naval Special Warfare Command filed the lawsuit against the following targets:

  • President Joe Biden

  • Défense Secretary Lloyd Austin

  • Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro

  • Defense Department

Citing fundamental rights to practice their Christian beliefs, the Navy members stated that because the vaccine was developed from aborted fetal cell lines that they would not accept the jabs—this would be an “affront to their Creator.”

The Ruling

The federal judge did acknowledge the COVID-19 pandemic’s severe impact on the military and society stating, “This Court does not make light of COVID-19′s impact on the military. Collectively, our armed forces have lost over 80 lives to COVID-19 over the course of the pandemic.”

However, reported by Dan Lamothe for the Washington Post, Judge O’Connor indicated the weight of these rights declaring “loss of religious liberties outweighs any forthcoming harm to the Navy.” Moreover, the federal judge continued, “even the direst circumstances cannot justify the loss of constitutional rights.”

Dan Lamothe also updated on the status of an ongoing lawsuit initiated by 35 Navy sailors, based on religious preferences, who are resisting the sweeping mandate of forced COVID-19 jabs. In what could be interpreted as a declaration impacting far more than this case, Judge O’Connor shared that the COVID-19 pandemic “provides the government with no license to abrogate” American freedoms enshrined in the Constitution. 

Counter View

Yet the military, under the Pentagon, has required several vaccinations for years now. In countering the potential injunction, DOD officials emphasized this mandate was in place and is like other vaccinations, and few have complained prior to this.

In fact, the Washington Post reports that a great majority of the over 1 million active-duty American service members have already received at least one jab: the Defense Department already commenced termination of military careers of resistors.

Top Israeli Immunologist—Time for the Israel Ministry of Health to Admit Mass COVID-19 Vaccination a Failure

A top Israeli immunologist has gone on the record in a candid message to that country’s Ministry of Health: it’s time to call out what a growing number of experts inherently already know—the complete eradication of the SARS-CoV-2 pathogen via mass vaccination has failed in Israel. “With booster after booster planned now, what else would the outcome be with an ever-mutating pathogen?”, goes the logic of Ehud Qimron who leads Tel Aviv University’s Department of Microbiology.

TrialSite translated the original media piece written in Hebrew, which also emphasizes that Professor Qimron went on the record back in August 2020 declaring that “History will judge the hysteria.” 

The Truth Shall Set You Free…for Emergency Damage Control

The top immunologist opens up, stating that while the truth can be kept from the public for a while, he implies that there is no stopping the flood of real-world data, and ultimately, knowledge based on cracks in the levee of information suppression can cause significant damage, thus turning society upside down if leadership isn’t ready with emergency planning.

He Said So…So did TSN

For a couple of years now, Prof. Qimron went on the record that a rapidly mutating respiratory virus won’t be eradicated with a vaccine, no matter how sexy “mRNA” sounds….TrialSite has also been consistent in reporting that coronaviruses aren’t easily eradicated with the use of novel technology let alone anything else.

Why Forget your Education & Training?

The Israeli immunologist chastises the eastern Mediterranean nation’s Health Ministry telling them they essentially mocked science as we know it, tossing years of observations and learnings by the wayside. What about natural immunity? What about their own contingency plans for emergency response?

Snake Oil or…

Instead, the Israeli Health Ministry, according to this critically sharp retort, focused on the promotion of false hopes and propaganda also known as good old fashioned snake oil—“do I have a tonic for you” drug peddlers would say while crisscrossing the U.S. West in the late 19th and early 20th century.

Destroying Trust in Medicine & Public Health

The Israeli scientist laments on what will happen to the public’s trust in public health, science, and medicine if it comes out that a confluence of medical establishments, industry, government, and corporate media conspired to suppress science? 

Trash-talking Peers

What about critical peers that sought at least alternatives? The “Barrington Declaration” comes to mind when over 60,000 scientists and medical professionals sought to pursue alternative, more common sensible, and science-based counters to the existing pandemic reasons.  

Operatives from the U.S. NIH to the Israeli Minister of Health sought to destroy their narrative and “take them down.”

Their Real Agenda?

How about a “lust for power, budgets, and control.”

Lead Research/Investigator

Ehud Qimron, Ph.D., BSc, Clinical Microbiology and Immunology 

Why African countries with onchocerciasis ivermectin programs show much better COVID-19 results?

Up to date, there are sixteen ivermectin studies on covid as prophylaxis. All of them validate the effectiveness in preventing a symptomatic disease.[i] The studies also underline a positive dose-response relationship. The results range from near 100% effectiveness in weekly doses to 50% in the 42-day period following a single dose. As onchocerciasis program comprises one dose every half-year, it is reasonable to think that the protection doesn’t last that long. A deeper look could give us a better understanding.

In March 2021, Japanese researchers published a study about African countries and Ivermectin on Covid-19. [ii] In the study, the authors evaluate COVID-19 outcomes in African regions. They split the countries into two groups: A group of countries with ivermectin programs to fight onchocerciasis, and another group with the remaining countries. As an aggregate, countries with the program have had a small fraction of Covid cases and deaths than the aggregation of countries without interventions. After ruling out the age disparities, the authors concluded: “treatment with ivermectin is the most reasonable explanation”.

Undoubtedly, age is a vital factor in COVID-19 outcomes, but it is not the only one. There are other aspects to consider and cancel out before concluding in favor of ivermectin. We know more testing means more cases. Were there fewer tests in the “ivermectin group”? We know that winter affects the outbreaks, are winter in the “ivermectin group” milder? Should we analyze international travelers? Should we examine the medical system or cultural traditions?

Testing strategy drive case and death count

Covid testing has been the known method of counting cases and deaths but is not reasonable to compare countries when testing strategies differ. Regions with extensive testing and modest incidence can detect much more cases than a modest testing with mounting incidence. The analysis of the number of tests and the positivity presents a much accurate view. Positivity could be a reliable indicator of the virus prevalence at a moment in time. Looking at the data, the vast disparity in testing can explain the considerably larger case and death count in “non-ivermectin countries” like South Africa, Tunisia, or Morocco. It is even more telling within the groups, countries in with a similar level of testing show similar levels of cases. That means that a difference in testing is a substantial driver of the lower-case incidence in the “ivermectin group.” As an illustration, Morocco has eight times more cases than Uganda, but six times more tests. South Africa that has twenty times more cases than Nigeria, but eighteen times more testing.

It is a common practice that in regions with limited tests, people with symptoms are the priority. Therefore, positivity reveals an acceptable covid share among those with flu-like symptoms. In regions with low testing like Africa, positivity rate might operate as a predictor of cases in the same way sera-prevalence samples predict population level antibodies. On average, the positivity in the “non-ivermectin group” has been 50% higher than the “ivermectin group” (10% vs 7%.) This difference supports the idea of better outcomes in the “ivermectin group” even after excluding the impact of the difference in the number of tests. There are certainly more factors, and they could be one.

Other factors

Traditional Chinese Medicine and Ayurveda are well-known Asian medical systems. Likewise, Sub-Saharan had maintained ancient medical traditions or “bush medicine.” Their knowledge comprises the use of natural medicine and techniques developed through thousands of years of treating various diseases.

A suitable example is the wisdom shared by the African slave Onesimus in 1721. He taught how to prevent smallpox in Boston USA, and his knowledge led to vaccine development. [iii]  This same ancient science holds dengue epidemics under control in Africa. Natural medicine is in wide use in Sub-Saharan Africa where doctors per capita is at least 4 times less than South Africa’s or that countries in Northern Africa. Ancient natural medicine it is another determinant factor in pandemic management.

The weather and the tourism played their role too. In Africa, Winter only affects Northern and Southern countries.[iv] All “ivermectin countries” are in Central Africa where temperature averages are above 70 F (20 C). The lack of winter also influenced a lower incidence in Central Africa. As international travelers drove covid, tourism is an important factor. Unsurprisingly, the number of arrivals in “ivermectin countries” is about 10 times fewer that the one in Northern Africa or in South Africa.[v] Then, international arrivals also influenced the lower Covid incidence in Central Africa.

Conclusion

Ivermectin interventions to treat parasites might have influenced COVID-19 outcomes in Central Africa, but they aren’t the leading driver. Other various factors better explain the difference in the aggregate results. The primary explanation is testing. The correlation between tests and cases or deaths is very strong. Other factors, like the use of natural medicine, the lack of winter, and the number of international arrivals, also played a fundamental role.

Top Research Chief for India: Merck’s Molnupiravir has ‘Major Safety Concerns’

With 26 research institutes, India’s ICMR or “Indian Council of Medical Research ” represents one of the largest and oldest apex medical research bodies worldwide. Overseeing research in the world’s second most populated nation and, according to some sources, the world’s fifth-largest economy as measured by gross domestic product (GDP), ICMR’s declarations as to the safety and efficacy of various investigational medical products carries considerable weight. Despite India’s drug regulatory body—the Drugs Controller General of India (DCGI) clearing Merck’s molnupiravir as the first antiviral COVID-19 orally administrated therapy, ICMR Chief Balram Bhargava has declared publicly that his group has “major safety concerns” associated with molnupiravir.

In a recent press conference, the ICMR chief declared:

First of all, the US has approved it based on only 1,433 patients with a three per cent reduction in moderate disease when given in mild cases. However, we have to remember that this drug has major safety concerns.”

“It can cause teratogenicity and mutagenicity and cause cartilage damage and be damaging to the muscles. More importantly, if given to a man or a woman, contraception will have to be maintained for three months as the child born during that period could have problems with teratogenic influences.”

Moreover, Bhargava continued “It (Molnupiravir) is not included in the national task force treatment. The WHO has not included it and nor has the UK as of now.”

Main Concerns: Pregnant Women, Children & More

As reported in multiple Indian media, including Indian Express, the top doctor for ICMR expressed concerns about molnupiravir’s possibility for side effects, raising risks for pregnant women, lactation, children as well as the possibility of causing soft tissue injuries in a reproductive age cohort.

Not a Good Drug

Furthermore, demonstrating more medical freedom, Bhargava went on the national record that the drug’s absolute risk reduction is less than desired, declaring, “Since there was only a three percent reduction in mild to moderate diseases, as of now, the current recommendations stand that it is not a part of the national task force treatment and we have debated on it twice. We will have further debate on it to discuss whether there is any possibility,” he said.

Background

Initially developed by a drug development unit within Emory University, the US-based biotechnology company Ridgeback Biotherapeutics licensed the intellectual property and thereafter entered a deal with Merck to co-development and commercialize the investigational product. Merck inked deals with up to 13 generic drug makers to expand use. 

TrialSite reported in Vietnam that Ho Chi Minh City’s public health department set up an actual home care program using this drug before even approved—possibly pushing ethical boundaries.

‘There is no Control of the Omicron Wave’ as Heavily Pfizer-Boosted Nation Shatters Infection Record

The omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 rages now through the eastern Mediterranean nation of Israel as the reported number of cases hit a COVID-19 pandemic record of 17,362 new infections on Monday, January 5th.  As TrialSite just reported, a fourth booster program commences, targeting higher risk demographics such as the elderly and immunocompromised. This sweeping contagion, while seemingly milder in symptoms, demonstrates the limitations of the mass vaccination to eradicate SARS-CoV-2 strategy in this heavily vaccinated nation driven by a confluence of elite medical establishment officials and executives in regulatory agencies, national and international public health authorities, elite academic medical centers, and industry not to mention financiers and investors monetizing the pandemic and influential not-for-profits. TrialSite shared with community members that by October and November of last year, based on Israel Health Ministry data that the unvaccinated still faced a higher risk for severe infection, but we also reported on striking numbers of breakthrough infections leading to hospitalization. One Sheba Medical Center study opens up a Moderna arm—are there some underlying seeds of doubt concerning Pfizer-BioNTech’s BNT162b2?

The good news is that despite historically high infections, the death rate is very low, at least thus far, based on data from the COVID-19 Data Repository by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University. TrialSite cannot be certain what’s behind the lower death rate but more than likely, a confluence of factors from vaccination and growing natural immunity to the milder mutant could be an explanation. So, in that way, mass vaccine proponents will claim that the products made the pandemic milder but a fundamental underlying assumption for what is now hundreds of billions worldwide spent on vaccine-supporting programs was very much centered on pathogen eradication—something the vaccine products are failing to address. TrialSite reminds all that, worldwide, nearly 5.5 million Covid deaths are recorded. Many critical care physicians have argued all along that off-label use of a handful of repurposed drugs could have saved many lives.

Out of Control

Sharon Alroy-Preis, the nation’s top public health official, told Channel 13, “There is no control of the Omicron wave.”  The health minister continued, “Probably no one is protected from infection,” reports the president of Shaare Zedek Medical Center in Jerusalem.

Goal: Keep Economy Open

Avoidance of economic pain and suffering becomes a top goal of governments across the West as the realities of the situation settle in—meaning the transition to an endemic stage and learning to live with the SARS-CoV-2 pathogen. Prime Minister Naftali Bennett declared at a recent press conference, “It’s a different ball game altogether.”

Let the Boosts Begin

Regardless of vaccine limitation, the fourth boost program accelerates full throttle. Israel21c reports thousands started last week getting their fourth booster shot of the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA-based vaccine since the government authorized use for healthcare workers, the elderly, and immunocompromised. The rationale for the decision? Protect the vulnerable from the imminent omicron wave. The decision was made prior to an important Sheba Medical Center study investigating the impact of a fourth dose on 150 employees at the academic medical center.

Israeli media reports that all those subjects that received three Pfizer-BioNTech doses five or more months ago now don’t have sufficient antibodies to respond to SARS-CoV-2.  

Concern with Pfizer-BioNTech Vaccine?

Interestingly, in this Sheba Medical Center study, led by the director of the Infectious Disease Epidemiology Unit, the study now expands, and a hospital spokesperson told Israel21c that they will embrace the Moderna mRNA-based vaccine on a separate group of study subjects. They will test if mRNA-1273 has a superior impact to resist omicron in healthcare workers that have already received three Pfizer-BioNTech doses.

Population-wide Observational Study in Brazil: Prophylactic Use of Ivermectin Reduces COVID-19 Mortality, Hospitalization & Infection

Lucy Kerr, a Brazilian physician, participated in an Ivermectin summit hosted by TrialSite. Kerr and four other medical researchers, two affiliated with Brazilian academic medical centers and one from a Cuban biotech institute were involved in the study of the efficacy of the generic, regulatory approved antiparasitic drug in three different municipalities in Brazil covered by TrialSite back in September 2020. Most recently, Dr. Kerr and colleagues posted the results of a citywide prevention program using ivermectin, implemented in Itajai in the south of Brazil. The prospective, observational study analyzed citywide COVID-19 data between July 2020 to December 2020. The study logistics of instructional review board approval and registry data analysis occurred retrospectively due to the urgent pandemic conditions at the time.

TrialSite emphasizes this research hasn’t been peer-reviewed yet and shouldn’t be cited as medical evidence. This media platform focuses on medical research and these results require further verification. The study data derives from a public health program in response to COVID-19 in the municipality of Itajai in Santa Catarina, Brazil. This city has nearly 285,000 residents.

The Study

As reported in the group’s manuscript posted on ResearchGate, the Brazilian observational retrospective study centered on population-level data associated with the Brazilian municipality’s public health program. A total of 220,517 subjects were included in the analysis including:

Group%133,051 regular ivermectin users60.3%87,466 non-ivermectin users39.7%

Study Hypothesis

Did ivermectin have a positive impact on subsequent COVID-19 infection and mortality rates?

Results

Setting up various categories for analysis, the study team compared ivermectin use with nonuse based on several cohorts (e.g., age, sex, comorbidities, etc.) while both employing, in some cases, patient propensity score matching or “PSM,” a statistical matching technique that attempts to estimate the effect of a treatment or other intervention by accounting for the covariates that predict receiving the treatment. This method is used in a bid to reduce bias in observational studies associated with confounding variables that are present in results.

The study team reports in what is still non-reviewed data the following:

  • Out of two study cohorts of 3,034 COVID-19 infected patients, the regular use of ivermectin led to a 68% reduction in COVID-19 mortality 25 (0.8%) versus 79 (2.6%) among ivermectin non-users—mortality rates were analyzed both with and without PSM. The reported risk ratio (RR) equaled 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.49; p < 0.0001.

  • Adjusting for residual variables, Kerr and team report a mortality reduction at 79% (RR, 0.30; 95%CI 0.19 – 0.46; p < 0.0001).

  • A 56% reduction in hospitalization rate (44 versus 99 hospitalizations among ivermectin users and non-users respectively—RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.31-0.63; p < 0.0001).

  • Adjusting for residual variable s they reported a reduction in hospitalization at 67% (RR, 0.33; 95%CI 023 – 0.66; p < 0.0001 ).

Conclusion

Dr. Kerr and colleagues report that based on their data, the large, propensity-matched study verifies that regular use of ivermectin as a prophylactic agent was associated with a significant reduction in COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and mortality rates.

Limitation

This study isn’t yet peer-reviewed, and hence, shouldn’t be used to cite medicinal evidence. Moreover, observational studies done retrospectively carry less weight than randomized, controlled studies. 

Comment

TrialSite notes that over 70 ivermectin studies have been concluded around the world, with a great majority of them evidencing some positive impact. In the West, (e.g., North America, Europe, Australia, etc.) medical establishments have discounted the numerous ivermectin studies and focused more on a couple of the studies that either generated neutral findings or in one case had what looked to be improper data manipulation. 

It’s astounding, however, that the positive data is uniformly discounted as not relevant.

Lead Research/Investigator