Renowned COVID Doctor: Vaccinated Are 'Super Delta Carriers' Spreading Sickness to the Unvaccinated By Brannon Howse, Leo Hohmann, 17 October, 2021

The Biden administration has been spitting out daily talking points that we are in a "pandemic of the unvaccinated," repeating this mantra over and over at daily briefings, in speeches and on social media.

But the scientific data suggests the opposite is true, according to Dr. Peter McCullough, an internist, cardiologist, epidemiologist and author of 46 peer-reviewed articles on Covid-19, in a recent interview with Brannon Howse Live on the WVW Broadcast Network.

"What we have seen is the ability for vaccinated individuals to carry and then develop and transmit Covid-19 in very high viral loads with the delta variant – it's 251- to 1,000-fold higher than the prior variants in the unvaccinated era," Dr. McCullough told Howse.

"So we do know that those who are vaccinated, and our CDC director has told us this, can become what we call super delta carriers, since 99 percent of what we have right now is the delta variant."

The transmissions of the virus from vaccinated to unvaccinated would seem to defeat the stated purpose of the vaccination, and yet there has been almost no coverage of this phenomenon by the corporate-owned establishment media.

McCullough said if it were not for "independent alternative channels" like Worldview Weekend and others, no one would be hearing the truth.

"We have seen in a sense the vaccine program backfire," McCullough said. "We have seen this emergence of the super dominant delta, and the vaccine has allowed delta to move forward in being a hyper-dominant variable because the vaccines don't cover delta enough."

These are what some scientists, McCullough included, have called "leaky" vaccines.

"There's what's called antigenic escape and that's been shown in multiple papers ... meaning the antibodies raised by the current Covid vaccines don't completely neutralize or sterilize the delta variant enough and so that allows the vaccinated person to not only get sick themselves but then pass it to other vaccinated or unvaccinated individuals," McCullough said.

This is different and more serious than mere "shedding," which is when a vaccinated person transmits small bits of the spike protein through skin to skin contact with others in the first 30 days or so after being injected.

"I would call this transmission [not shedding]," McCullough said. "We know this transmission occurs when someone is symptomatic," meaning they are coughing or sneezing.

McCullough urged people to beware of public restrooms.

"Most of it is transmitted through the air, coughing and sneezing. In public restrooms you're talking about closely confined areas, where the air is heavy; you have a small room and a lot of people going in and out. The virus is spread by coughing and sneezing and also through the GI tract."

McCullough said the FDA hearings last month for the Pfizer booster shot provided no evidence of any benefits from boosters that outweigh the risks. Shockingly, the FDA approved the Pfizer booster anyway.

Representing the public at those hearings were Drs. Joseph Freeman, an emergency-room physician in New Orleans; Steve Kirsch, executive director of Covid-19 Early Treatment Fund; Steven Weisman, a regulatory consultant; and Jessica Rose, an epidemiologist from Canada now based in Haifa, Israel.

These doctors and scientists made the case to the FDA that the vaccines did not have a favorable risk-to-benefit relationship.

"In fact, it wasn't debated. It wasn't refuted," McCullough said. "One was more likely to die after receiving a vaccine than from getting Covid-19 itself as a respiratory illness. So I think this was really big testimony. And for that reason the only thing they were able to provide in support of the boosters was a rise in antibodies, but we know the rise in antibodies doesn't cover the delta variant so these are still antibodies to the original Wuhan spike protein.

"Steve Kirsch led that presentation and it wasn't strongly supportive at all for Pfizer as boosters."

Since those hearings, there have been follow-up papers published in scientific journals that support the position of the four experts on the public comments panel.

He cited a multi-national study "that concluded across every age group, that one was more likely to die of the vaccine.

"The reason was once one receives the vaccine, that is a certainty, the vaccine is in the body. With Covid-19 there's a chance that many people never come in contact with it. So the way it calculates out, within every age group one is more likely to die with the vaccine than actually taking their luck without the vaccine and getting Covid."

Another paper by Dr. Tracy Hoeg at University of California at Davis, was published specifically on young people injected with the vaccine.

"It estimated that the risks of the messenger RNA vaccines, Pfizer and Moderna, causing myocarditis and having that heart inflammation causing a person to be hospitalized, was greater than Covid-19 causing a hospitalization in a young person," McCullough said. "So now we have two analyses, both on death and myocarditis, showing you'd be better off forgetting the vaccine and just taking your chances with Covid-19."

"This is huge news," he added, totally ignored by the establishment, corporate-owned media. "And I can tell you that's why people are turning to your channel and other independent channels."

"I feel like I'm under direct threat in terms of the medical boards, and the threats that doctors like myself have received, just for citing the data," McCullough said. "Every single author can be found on the internet, I'm just reciting the data for you."

McCullough cited two more studies in the interview that show 23 percent of hospitalizations are the vaccinated.

For that reason the only thing that was presented in support of the boosters was a rise in antibodies. But, we know the antibodies don't cover the delta variant, so these are antibodies related to the original Wuhan spike protein which is produced by the current coded Pfizer vaccine.

The result of meeting and testimony from the experts was not a broad approval of boosters, but a consideration for boosters for those over age 65. The FDA added, without any supporting data, individuals who could be at high risk for having exposure to Covid.

McCullough said data through June, 2121, shows 23 percent of hospitalizations were the unvaccinated, not 1 percent like the Biden administration has said.

And how many of the unvaccinated infected with Covid actually caught it from a vaccinated person?

"They could have received a transmission from the vaccinated. But also, the CDC has told hospitals not to test the vaccinated, but they do test the unvaccinated, and so that is generating a lot of positive cases among the unvaccinated. So, a lot of the numbers are stilted toward the unvaccinated being the problem."

McCullough also cited four peer-reviewed papers, all of which showed "those who previously had Covid and then unwisely took the vaccine had higher side-effect rates. So as far as we can tell there's absolutely no reason for a Covid-recovered patient to take the vaccine. There's no data for that at all."

McCullough's website is Americaoutloud.com

RFK Jr.: CIA-led 'Military Response' to Pandemic Was Meant to Drive Democracy From the World and Usher in Global Totalitarianism

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. dropped several bombshells in his new book, The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health. And he saved some of his biggest revelations for a Nov. 18 interview with Brannon Howse Live.

The attorney and public-health activist called out the players who have been pushing the fear narrative that has been, since February 2020, built around the "public health emergency" known as Covid-19 and basically led to a suspension of the U.S. Constitution.

"I think the parts of the book people are really going to be interested in is the history of Tony Fauci," Kennedy told Howse in the hour-long interview.

"Instead of having a medical response to a medical crisis, we had a militarized response and we had a monetized response," Kennedy said.

"All of the policies of Fauci were designed to facilitate the public view that the vaccines were the only way out of the pandemic and then came the use of orchestrated fear as propaganda. To get people to be locked in under house arrest and induce a condition that is known as Stockholm syndrome, which makes people grateful to their captors and believing in them that the only way to survive, the only way out of the crisis, is total obedience to the commands of the captor."

But perhaps the most shocking revelation for most readers of Kennedy's book will be the case he builds against the U.S. government intelligence agencies as having scripted the entire reaction to the virus ahead of time.

"One of the things I think I show that will surprise people is the deep involvement of intelligence agencies. Not only in the gain of function funding in Wuhan and the very odd partnerships they had with the Chinese military scientists, but also how it was the intelligence community, particularly the CIA, that conspired with Tony Fauci to use the pandemic as a pretense to impose totalitarian controls, to obliterate the Bill of Rights, not only in the United States but in democracies across the world."

Kennedy's research turned up the fact that 68 percent of Fauci's salary comes from bioweapons research.

He peels back the layers of the long history of Fauci's tenure at the National Institutes of Health [NIH] and shows how, through the AIDS crisis, he parlayed it into a multi-billion dollar agency that no longer does basic public-health research.

"It does pharmaceutical drug development. It's the principal incubator for new pharmaceutical products, from 2009 to 2016 there were about 240 new drugs approved by the FDA that all came out of Tony Fauci's shop," Kennedy said. "And Fauci and his agency are allowed to patent those drugs and individuals within those agencies, including Fauci, can keep up to $150,000 a year from royalties on products they develop at NIH."

He said Fauci's NIAID, a sub agency of the NIH, has an annual budget of $6.6 billion "and virtually all of it goes to drug development."

"He farms it out to universities, they become allies, and he partners with them and the pharmaceutical companies in developing new drugs and uses his power to usher those through the regulatory process and get FDA approval. So he controls all of the relevant agencies at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, not just NIAID, but NIH, and CDC to some extent, and the FDA almost completely," Kennedy said.

He said Bill Gates and the NGO that controls Welcome Trust control 61 percent of the world's biomedical research.

Kennedy highlights a pivotal shift in American policy after the 2001 anthrax attacks.

He said the U.S. had been engaged in a terror-based foreign policy, but the problem was that Islamic terrorists weren't killing enough people to scare enough Americans into giving up their constitutionally guaranteed freedoms and liberties. Nor could it be used to coerce people in the free world to accept mandatory vaccines.

A germ-based foreign policy would be much more scary and effective.

"It gets in the air, people can't see it," Kennedy said.

A seminal moment took place in the year 2000 when Bill Gates called Fauci to his mansion outside of Seattle.

"They shook hands in the living room of his $87 million mansion, and they shook hands for a partnership to vaccinate the whole world by the year 2020," Kennedy said. "And they worked with the intelligence agencies and the Pentagon to make that happen."

It was later discovered that the anthrax had originated from U.S. military laboratories.

Nixon signed a bioweapons security treaty in 1972, which made it illegal to do any kind of experimentation or storing of biological weapons.

"But the CIA continued to do it illegally, funding it through USAID," Kennedy said.

There was a loophole in the bioweapons treaty, allowing the funding of biomedical research if you could claim there was a dual use, such as the development of vaccines that could be used as a defense against a bioweapon.

"But the Pentagon didn't want to get into that business because they felt they would be exposed. So they started funneling money through NIH and that money ended up with Tony Fauci," Kennedy said.

In addition to the $6.1 billion Fauci gets from U.S. taxpayers every year for this research, he gets another $1.6 billion from the military to do bioweapons research, which they called "dual use" research.

At some point the terminology for bioweapons research changed from "dual use" to "gain of function."

Fauci received a 68 percent raise in his salary in 2002, and the pay hike was tied directly to his continued bioweapons research. Today he's paid an annual salary of $434,000, the highest of anybody in the U.S. government, including the president, who gets paid $400,000 a year.

In 2014, a group of 300 scientists sent a letter to Obama asking him to shut down Fauci's gain of function research, which they considered extremely dangerous because Fauci's research was all about teaching viruses to jump from one species to another.

Obama responded in 2014 with a moratorium on all gain of function research.

But Fauci repeatedly violated the moratorium, he said.

Under increasing pressure from the scientific community, Fauci began funneling his money to Chinese labs, which were working on the transmission of coronavirus from bats to humans.

"And during the entire moratorium he continued to do something that was very revealing," Kennedy said.

Fauci funded Ralph Baric, a professor of epidemiology and virology at UNC-Chapel Hill, who developed a way of hiding the genetic engineering that was going on in the bioweapons research labs.

"If you really were doing vaccine research, you would do the opposite of that. You would make sure all of your tampering was completely visible. This was weapons research. It had nothing to do with public health," Kennedy said.

What happened at Event 201?

Kennedy also explains the significance of Event 201, a simulation of a coronavirus epidemic held in New York City in October 2019. The coronavirus didn't begin circulating until two months later in December.

Who was in attendance at the Event 201 simulation?

Silicon Valley's Big Tech giants all had representatives there, as did Big Pharma, Bloomberg News, NBC and the Washington Post.

The head of the Chinese CDC was there, as was the Gates Foundation, Johns Hopkins University Center for Health Security, the World Economic Forum, the United Nations World Health Organization, and Avril Haines of the CIA.

"The two hosts were Bill Gates and Avril Haines, former deputy director of CIA and who is now Biden's director of national intelligence. She is the nation's top spy," Kennedy said. "Which is bizarre. And it's bizarre that the CIA was at this conference."

Their plan, revealed in the four Event 201 discussion seminars, was to develop a grid system to connect doctors all over the world, forcing them to follow globalized, universal health protocols in the treatment of the virus.

"They never talked about isolating the sick, or treating them. They never talked about how do you preserve constitutional rights during a pandemic. What they talked about was a military response and how to use the pandemic as an excuse to impose totalitarian controls on our country and all countries around the world," Kennedy said.

The four seminars remain on YouTube as of this writing.

"If you look at Seminar 4, which is the longest and the last of the four seminars, it's all about censorship. All about how do you get the social media companies to censor discussion of suspicions that this is a lab leak, that the coronavirus now spreading across the world was caused by a lab leak," Kennedy said.

And Event 201 was no one-off event.  There have been 20 such simulations since 1999, according to Kennedy's research.

"Collectively they're called Operation Lockstep. And the problem they were addressing was how do you get all the liberal democracies in the world to pivot in lockstep and turn themselves into totalitarian nations? They practiced again and again. And in each one of these simulations, none of them were about public health. They're all about, how do you do a controlled demolition of democracy across the globe."

Two of the common denominators of these virus simulations were the presence or involvement of Bill Gates and the CIA.

"Gates is participating in a lot of them directly or one of his quasi-organizations, which is the Johns Hopkins School of Population Control, they're there at almost all of them. But the one constant in every one of these is the CIA.

"There's high-level CIA officials and intelligence officials, and the CIA wrote the script for every single one of them. So you have to ask yourself, what is their intent with these kind of simulations? Clearly it was not the preservation of the United States Constitution or the constitutions in any of these countries; it was all about how to abolish democracy in all of these nations."

Kennedy ticked off every single right guaranteed by the Bill of Rights and showed Howse how it has been assaulted by the Covid response of government at all levels.

"Our Bill of Rights has been obliterated, starting with the First Amendment; people like me are not allowed to talk, we're not allowed to criticize our government," he said. "Even with a product that is experimental, we cannot question. Doctors who believe they've found other ways to treat coronavirus, they're gaslighted, they're punished, they're silenced."

Once they decimated free speech, they went after freedom of religion.

"They closed every church in this nation for a year, and they did this with no public hearings, no scientific need. They abolished religious exemptions," Kennedy said. "And they kept the liquor stores open. I have nothing against liquor stores but they're not in the Constitution. Churches are."

Next to fall by the wayside was freedom of assembly. They implemented social distancing – a term no one had ever heard of before it became ubiquitous overnight.

"Controls were put on everything. They separated families and individuals in a way that was unprecedented. They made everybody wear masks. Which of course created a huge psychological distancing – it drives people apart, It creates fear. We all treat each other as biohazards."

Employers can now commandeer your medical rights and medical privacy. Freedom of movement was curtailed in many countries, and all of one's privacy is compromised with the implementation of digital vaccine passports.

"Who else in history issued passes?" Kennedy asked. "Hitler and the Apartheid regime of South Africa. This is a tool of dictatorship, we know that. We've always known that."

Digitized, programmable money

If you go to Europe, the passes are not being issued by the ministers of health. They're being issued by the financial ministries. There's a reason for that, Kennedy said.

"The purpose is to have your credit rating and your civic rating on there," he said. This is modeled after the Chinese Communist Party's social-credit scoring system, in which a person's access to their money can be shut off if they don't obey the rules of the state.

"It's not just digital. It's digital and programmable currency, so that if you don't comply they tell you that you can't go more than ten blocks from your house. And if someone lives in Milan and wants to go to Bologna, your money won't work in Bologna."

In short, the governments, with their allies in the banking and corporate world, are able to use digital money to categorize and then otherize people with dissident views.

"If they tell you that you can only eat in a pizza parlor, your money will only work in a pizza parlor. That's what this is all about."

"So all of these constitutional rights. We have something called due process of law. If you want to pass a law in the U.S., you get Congress to pass it. If you don't like it you can try to get them voted out of office. This was a safeguard."

But now, under the guise of an "emergency," a career politician like Joe Biden who's been in D.C. for 50 years, can just make a law by decreeing it out of thin air, Kennedy said.

That means the entire constitutional process of how laws are enacted, the entire American system of separation of powers and checks and balances, has been bypassed compliments of Covid and a CIA/military psy-op,

COVID-19: A MUCOSAL DISEASE Robert_Clancy

Emeritus Professor Robert Clancy AM

1. The Influenza Model: Pandemic Experience.

Covid-19 is an RNA virus infection of the respiratory mucosa with mechanisms and clinical characteristics similar to those of influenza. Both can occur in pandemics – currently it is Covid-19 that has our attention with 250 million documented infections and in excess of 5 million deaths. In 1918-1919 it was Spanish influenza (sub-type H1N1) that infected one third of the world (500 million) with a 10% mortality (compared to Covid’s 3% with 2% mortality). The Spanish flu swept the world in three waves over two years. The “middle wave” was driven by a mutant involving its haemagglutinin & RNA polymerase (identified from naturally stored virus (1)).

How is this relevant to Covid-19?

H1N1 became the “driver” of influenza over the subsequent century. Within 3 years H1N1 had mutated into “seasonal” flu with a mortality less than 0.1%. The question is “Will this happen with SARS-CoV-2?”  We do not know but antigen drift and herd immunity (probably connected variables) are likely determinants of the switch from pandemic to endemic disease. Differences in population exposure and the impact of vaccination on mutant selection remain unknowns(2). Currently 51% of the world have had at least one jab, but in low-income countries, this figure is only 4%. Yet mortality appears higher in those countries with high vaccination rates. Israel and India are examples. Israel is a much-vaunted vaccine “laboratory”. In late August it had a vaccine rate of over 80%, but with continued high mortality rate of 2.9/million population, from Covid-19. India with a vaccine rate of less than 10%, had a Covid mortality of 0.25/million population (though some regions such as Uttar Pradesh had a remarkable reduction of Covid cases following introduction of ivermectin(3)). Will those from less developed countries transit more seamlessly to “seasonal infections” due to high levels of natural immunity?

Subscribe to the Trialsitenews "Coronavirus" Channel

No spam - we promise

Vaccine-induced immunity is less durable and more restricted than natural immunity, possibly leading to a greater chance of mutant selection(4). Swedish epidemiologists point to a near-absence of a third wave in Sweden (less than 1000 cases & 10 deaths per day for 5 months), attributing this shift towards “seasonal flu status” to less lockdowns and restrictions leading to higher natural immunity (5).

Vaccination in Sweden was also delayed with less than one third vaccinated by mid 2021.

2. The Influenza Model: Infection of a mucosal compartment.

 “Text book assurances that T-cell and B-cell memory priming give lasting protection–were looking thin”: this  conclusion from a recent review(6) on booster shots for Covid should not have surprised the authors. It is exactly what is expected for a mucosa-restricted virus following a systemic vaccine, as happens with influenza. Attenuation of systemic and mucosal immunity follow the “rules” of mucosal immunology. Four prominent mucosal immunologists identified the mucosal immune response as “Neglected but Critical” to the understanding of Covid-19 infection(7). They traced the sIgA2 antibody response from inductive sites within the nasopharynx-associated lymphoid tissue (NALT) of Waldeyer’s Ring, to the homing of B-lymphocytes to mucosal sites (IgA) and systemic lymphoid tissue (IgG) determined by receptors specific for respective target tissues. Important additions to this “classic” review include:

  1. Similar circuitry for T cells – Th17 cells from aggregated lymphoid tissue recruit neutrophils, drive protective cytokines and control innate immunity (8,9).

  2. Complicated cell interactions at mucosal surfaces including antigen & functionally specific dendritic cell populations, activate both CD4+ CD25+ and CD8+ Treg cells which powerfully supress both mucosal and systemic immune responses (10).

  3. A “common mucosal system” exists based on cell homing characteristics: NARES is important within the nasopharynx, but Peyer’s patches in the gut populate the bronchus mucosa with T- and B-cells (11).

  4. Virus interaction with the microbiome influences infection outcome (12).

Recent data from study of nasal secretions in Covid patients (13) confirmed:

  1. the compartmental distribution of antibody and cytokine responses in Covid infection,

  2. linkage of impaired innate immunity with clinical Covid,

  3. the importance of the microbiome.

Differences between Covid-19 and seasonal influenza such as a twenty-fold greater mortality for Covid-19, are due in part to SARS-CoV-2 receptors extending to within the alveoli (favouring alveolitis)(14) and  Spike protein toxicity on microvasculature(15).

3. Understanding Covid-19 Vaccine limitations.

  1. Covid-19 and influenza vaccines reduce the incidence of severe disease for 6-9 months, with less effect on asymptomatic infection (due to control of alveolitis by IgG antibody but minimal impact on the mucosal compartment (7). Corona and influenza viruses in the community cause recurrent mucosal infections driving downregulation of systemic immunity by T reg cells (16,17,18 ). Unregulated synthesis of spike protein following genetic vaccines means unpredictable stimulus-response dynamics, including potential for high-dose tolerance (17,18). Attenuation of antibody responses, and the blunted anamnestic antibody responses following “second jabs”(16,19,20) reflect this downregulation. Injected vaccines have little impact on mucosal immunity (13) with “the vaccinated” becoming infected and capable of transmitting virus, although leaked IgG antibody modulates infectivity (7).

  2. UK vaccine data published in a series of Technical briefings show a progressive loss of protection against Covid-19, a shift where older vaccinated subjects are more prone to infection than those without vaccination, & more severe disease in the vaccinated. Mortality from Covid-19 was 3.6 fold greater in those vaccinated (Report 23) (21). From the same data sets, mortality from all causes in those 10-59 is twice the rate in vaccinated versus unvaccinated. Variables such as age spread of vaccination may account for the difference, but linkage to vaccination must also be considered.

  3. Booster “Shots”. Spacing is critical as frequent vaccination is subject to the rules of mucosal immunology with ever-more frequent vaccinations causing immune suppression and severe adverse events. The latter suggested by co-incidence in Israel of tracked “average daily deaths” with cumulative booster numbers (22). Given uncontrolled antigen dose with genetic vaccines, annual vaccination with antigen-based vaccines as used in influenza, combined with re-purposed anti-viral drugs to manage “vaccine-escape” is an attractive option.

  4. Immune-mediated cell toxicity. The high incidence of post-vaccination adverse events including death reported across populations (22), may involve antibody or T cell induced toxicity directed against surface expressed spike protein(23). “Boosters” loom as a particular risk (21, 22, 23, 24).

  5. Mucosal Immune senescence. Generation of adaptive immune mechanisms and linked threshold innate immunity required to control virus-initiated mucosal damage, is less efficient over 65, especially in men(25). Delayed immunity in those over 65, causes an increase in virus load, more severe disease and delayed antibody response following vaccination (25, 26, 27).

CONCLUSION:

 Early mucosal events following Covid infection shape clinical outcomes, while seasonal Corona virus infections (28) influence vaccine outcomes. Infection of the respiratory mucosa drives:

  1. mucosal T- and B-cell (IgA2) responses via a common mucosal system,

  2. primes systemic (IgG) immunity,

  3. activates profound downregulation of mucosal and systemic specific anti-viral immunity via CD4 and CD8 T-reg cells.

Vaccination drives systemic immunity which limits damaging hypersensitivity response to virus within the gas-exchange apparatus. Limited airways protection permits asymptomatic infection and virus spread. The duration of protection is limited by T reg cells mediating “mucosal tolerance” probably due to seasonal Corona virus infections. This contrasts with durable “sterilising immunity” that follows immunisation for systemic infections.

The outcome of vaccination against Covid-19 infection is determined by:

  1. the balance of neutralising (prevention of systemic inflammation), enhancing(29) (promotion of infection) and pathogenic (a determinant of adverse events) antibodies and T cells. The net outcome is influenced by the half-life of each, and level of sensitisation (eg promotion of infection when neutralising antibody wanes due to more durable enhancing antibody; more severe adverse events in sensitised individuals).

  2. Genetic changes due to preferred translation of vaccine “capped” mRNA (30) causing cell dysfunction, and incorporation of coding for spike protein into genomic DNA from vaccine mRNA via reverse transcriptase(31) causing chronic disease such as “Long Covid” (similar to EBV infection) – hypothetical but logical and must be excluded.

  3. The extent spike protein causes immediate toxicity (15) and long term damage such as neural degeneration due to protein aggregation (in part due to prion sequences) as also seen in H1N1 influenza(32), and autoimmune disease (33).

Covid-19 is a mucosal infection influenced by the rules of mucosal immunology. Failure to recognise this has clouded understanding, confused decision making, and retarded strategic thinking (34), often invoking the idea of “original antigenic sin”(35) or “acquired immune deficiency” (36) to explain otherwise difficult observations of down-regulation in influenza and Covid infections. Influenza, its vaccine and natural history, is a useful model enabling a better understanding and prediction of Covid-19 behaviour. Genetic vaccines have played a role in the pandemic, but they remain “experimental” with many unanswered questions, including a potential impact on the transition to “seasonal” infection status. Review within the frame of mucosal immunology is an opportunity to define a management strategy best suited to control of Covid-19. The strategic rejection of safe, inexpensive, and effective re-purposed drugs to help confine infection to within the mucosal compartment in order to protect a vaccine of limited value and pharmaceutical company interests, in part reflects poor understanding of mucosal immune protection and the need for additional drug therapy to buffer vaccine limitations. This neglect costing numerous lives, will be noted in history as a monumental error of the pandemic (3,37).

REFERENCES.

  1. “The Origin and Virulence of the 1918 “Spanish” Influenza Virus”. Taubenerger, J et al. Proc Am Philos Soc 150(1)(2006) 86-112

  2. “A human coronavirus evolves antigenically to escape antibody immunity”. Eguia R, et al. BioRxiv. 2020 (Published on-line Dec 18)

  3. John Campbell (https://youtu.be/eOgcjy3Rydc)

  4. “Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity: reinfections versus breakthrough infections”. Gazit S, et al. MedRxiv (Pre-print 25/8/21).

  5. “Sweden won the argument on Covid”. Tegnell, A. The Post (on-line 23/9/21)

  6. “Waning Immunity to SARS-CoV-2; implications for vaccine booster strategies”. Altmann, D et al. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine (on- line 21.10.21)

  7. “Mucosal Immunity in COVID-19: A Neglected but Critical Aspect of SARS-CoV-2 Infection”. Russell, M. et al. Front Immunol (on line 30/11/2020).

  8. “A Role for Intestinal T Lymphocytes in Bronchus mucosal Immunity”. Wallace F. et al Immunology 74(1991)68-73

  9. “Acute Exacerbations in COPD and their control with Oral Immunisation with non-typable haemophilus influenzae”. Clancy et al Front Immunol (on-line 15 /3/2011)

  10. “Microbe-Dendritic cell dialogue controls regulatory T cell fate”. Grainger, J. et al. Immunol Review 234(2010)305-316

  11. “Repopulation with IgA-containing cells of bronchial and intestinal lamina propria after transfer of homologous Peyer’s patch and bronchial lymphocytes”. Rudzik,R .et al. J Immunol 114(1975) 1599-604

  12. “A Rodent Model of concurrent respiratory infection with influenza virus and gram negative bacteria”. Dunkley, M et al In: Mucosal Solutions. Advances in Mucosal Immunology 1(1997)261-268

  13. “Distinct systemic and mucosal immune responses during acute SARS-CoV-2 infection”. Smith N, et al. Nature Immunology 22(2021)1428-1439.

  14. “Tissue distribution of ACE2 protein, the functional receptor for SARS coronavirus”, Hamming I. et al. J Pathol 2(2004)631-7

  15. “SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein Impairs Endothelial Cell Function”, Lei Y. et al. Circ Res 128(on -line 31.3.21) 1323-26

  16. “Waning Immunity of the BNT 162b2 vaccine”. Goldberg,Y .et al MedRxiv (on-line 30/8/21)

  17. 17 “Control of Regulatory T cells and Airway Tolerance” Duan,W et al. Ann Am Thoracic Society 11(2014) S306-S313

  18. “High-dose allergen exposure leads to tolerance” Woodfolk, J. et al Clin Rev All and Immunol 28(2005)43-58

  1. “Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Response Following Vaccination” Steensels,D et al JAMA 326(2021)1533-1535

  2. “Dynamics of antibody response to BNT162b2 vaccine after six months” Naaber, P et al. Lancet Regional Health – Europe 10(2021)100208

  3. “SARS-CoV-2 Variants of concern and Variants under investigation in England. Technical Briefing 23” (on- line 17.9.21) Series of Regular Reports.

  4. “Antibody-Dependent Enhancement: Challenge for Developing a Safe Dengue Vaccine” Shukla R et al, Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol (on-line, 22/10/20)

  5. “SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells in infection and vaccination” Bertoletti, A et al Cell and Molec Immunol. 18(2021)2307-12

  6. ”Estimating the Number of Covid Vaccine Deaths in America”. Kirsch S et al (on-line 1/11/21: Pge 24)

  7. “Are we seeing some new form of acquired immunodeficiency Syndrome? (The Expose :on-line (16/11/21)

  8. “Two different antibody-dependent enhancement risks for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies” Ricke, D et al. Front Immunol (on-line 24/2/21)

  9. “An Oral Whole-Cell killed Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae Immunotherapeutic for the Prevention of acute exacerbatons of chronic airway disease” Clancy, R et al. Int J of COPD 14(2019)2423-31.

  10. “The impact of immune-aging on SARS-CoV-2 vaccine development”

  11. Connors, J. et al .GeroScience 43(2021)31-51

  12. “Age-dependent immune response to the Biontech/Pfizer BNT162b2 Civid-19 Vaccination”

  13. Muller L. Clin Infect Dis . doi : 10 1093/cid/ciab 381.

  14. “Seasonal human corona virus antibodies are boosted upon SARS-CoV-2 infection but are not associated with protection”. Anderson E, et al Cell 184 (2021) 1858-64

  15. “Ivermecin for Prevention and Treatment of Covid-19 Infection”. Bryant, A et al Am J of Ther 29(2021) (on-line p e434-e460)

  16. “mRNA vaccines for COVID-19: what, why, and how.” Park J, et al Int J Biol Sci 17(2021)1446-1460

  17. 31 “SARS-CoV-2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair and Inhibits V(D)J Recombination In Vitro”, Jiang H. et al. Viruses 13(10) (2021)2056.

  18. “SARS-CoV-2 spike protein interactions with amyloidogenic proteins: Potential clues to neurodegeneration”, Idrees, D. et al Biochem.Biophys Res. Commun. 554(2021)94-98

  19. “Neurological autoimmune diseases following vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2” Kaulen L.et al Eur J Neurol. (on-line 19.10.21)

  20. ”The ‘original antigenic sin” and its relevance for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination” Rjikers,G. et al Clin. Immunol. Commun 1(2021)13-16

  21. “Covid vaccine immunity is waning – how much does that matter?” Dolgin E, et al Nature, News Explainer (on-line 17.9.21)

Geoffrey Young: 45-Year-Old FBI Special Agent Died Less Than 24 Hours After Receiving The Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine

ARIZONA, UNITED STATES – A 45-year-old man died less than 24 hours after receiving the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. Geoffrey Young, an FBI special agent, got the shot on April 17th. Within hours, he had several symptoms including a headache and nausea. His wife checked on him in bed many times because he was rustling around, but he seemed fine, and they thought the side effects were normal. The next time she saw him several hours later, he was blue, and his arm was stretched out hanging off the bed. He wasn’t breathing and he was eventually pronounced dead.

His wife, Ona, said in a video posted on Instagram:

“My husband very much so believed in freedom. So much so that he went to work every day to support our freedoms, and to fight for our freedoms. He trusted science, he went and got his shot. He did before it was told that you have to go get this. And he would giggle at me and tell me ‘Ona, you’re being silly, it’s okay. Don’t worry about it. Millions of people are getting them, and they’re fine. We’re gonna be okay’.”

A VAERS report was made on Geoffrey’s death:


Cienna Knowles: Healthy 19-Year-Old Hospitalized With Blood Clots After Her Second Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine

GOSFORD, NSW – A healthy 19-year-old woman is hospitalized with her body full of blood clots shortly after her second Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. Cienna Knowles got the shot on the morning of the 21st. That night, she woke up vomiting and her whole body was shaking. She was rushed to the ER after a D-dimer test came back positive which showed that she had developed blood clots all over her legs and lungs. The 19-year-old is now struggling to come to terms with her life never going back to normal again.

Cienna said in a video posted on TikTok today:

“So for those who personally know me, know that I was scared of getting the vaccination and said I’ll hold off for as long as I can until I have to. And I was pretty much told no jab, no job, can’t compete with my horses, can’t go anywhere. You’re selfish if you don’t get it, just get it. So, I tossed it out and did what was ‘right’ to do. I was a perfectly healthy, normal 19-year-old kid and have never been to hospital whatsoever.”

Melle Stewart: 40-Year-Old Actress Fought For Her Life After A Stroke Caused By The AstraZeneca COVID-19 Vaccine

LONDON, ENGLAND – An Australian actress who lives in London fought for her life after a stroke caused by the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. Melle Stewart got the shot on May 24th. Two weeks later, she woke up with a strange feeling on the right side of her body. She collapsed and was rushed to hospital. The actress ended up in ICU, where she was diagnosed with Thrombocytopenic Thrombosis. Her husband and fellow actor, Ben Lewis, recently decided to break his silence on his wife’s ordeal.

  • Ben Davis and Melle Stewart

Melle spent three weeks in an induced coma on a ventilator after she suffered a severe stroke, caused by two large clots in the main veins of her brain. After spending almost five weeks fighting for life in ICU, she was transferred to an Acute Stroke Unit where she started rehabilitation, before being moved to a specialized London hospital on September 8th.

The ‘fit and healthy’ professional actress who had never been in hospital before is now relearning how to talk, walk, and move her right arm and hand, and will remain in the hospital into 2022 as she learns to adjust to her new life. She still takes anti-clotting and anti-seizure medication and will require further surgery to have a titanium plate fitted in her skull to replace the portion removed during a previous operation.

You can support Ms. Stewart on GoFundMe as she will need a series of ongoing rehabilitation therapy including physio, occupational, speech, and psychological therapy.

Traian Calancea: 24-Year-Old Student Dies 10 Days After Receiving The Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine, Mother Seeks Answers

TRENTO, ITALY – A 24-year-old man has died 10 days after receiving the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. Traian Calancea, a university student, got the shot on October 10th. He died on Wednesday, October 20th from a cerebral hemorrhage at his home. Traian, of Moldovan origin, leaves both the Moldovan and Romanian communities dismayed, as well as his many Italian friends by his sudden death.

Traian and his mother Svetlana

His mother, Svetlana, who found him lifeless in the bathroom, is heartbroken by the sudden death of her son. No one understands how Traian, who was ‘very fit’ with no health issues, died from a cerebral hemorrhage just 10 days after the Pfizer vaccine. His best friend said:

“There are no words to describe what I feel. I can’t really realize what happened, why you? I will remember you with a smile, you deserve it. I loved you and I will always love you. Rest in peace.”

Traian first attended Leonardo Da Vinci scientific high school before going to university where he studied at the faculty of Economics and Commerce. Until Wednesday, he worked and studied at the same time.