What about the vulnerable?

As the reality of the SARS-CoV-2 virus being endemic becomes clearer, some governments have shifted their focus towards a more realistic way of living with the virus. We all wish to regain normality. However, the question on everyone’s mind is, “How do we live with a virus that can be dangerous to high-risk individuals with no prior immunity or a weakened immune system?” 

How do we protect the vulnerable and move on with life? 

The Vulnerable 

COVID-19 presents a negligible risk to most of the population. Unfortunately, as with other infectious respiratory diseases, COVID-19 poses a more serious risk of severe illness and death to the elderly and individuals with multiple health problems. Despite this, the median age of death with COVID-19 is similar to that of natural mortality in most countries, while about 95% of deaths occur in individuals with one or more existing health problems.

Health Interventions Based On Needs

Lockdowns —a blunt one-size-fits-all approach— failed to stop transmission or to protect the vulnerable and caused immense collateral damage, particularly to the young and the poor. They are the antithesis of public health. The role of public health agencies is to offer accurate information and support, build healthcare capacity and allow individuals and local communities to make health decisions for their physical, mental, social wellbeing and quality of life. Thus, health interventions (medical or non-pharmaceutical) with established safety and efficacy should be offered to those for whom the benefit of the intervention clearly outweighs its risks.

The ‘Safe’ Green Zones

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the US proposed the shielding approach in July 2020, as an alternative to lockdowns. The proposal suggested placing high-risk individuals in self-sustaining “camps”, isolated from loved ones and society for 6 months. The residents would be expected to clean the camp, with able-bodied residents taking care of less mobile ones. High-risk children would also be kept in these camps with no mention of any provisions being made for their education or other activities. Strict protocols were laid out for the delivery of supplies and food; whatever is needed for the upkeep of a camp containing a concentrated population of vulnerable people. 

The CDC admits that there is no empirical evidence to show that this approach would reduce infections, hospitalisations or deaths among the vulnerable. In fact, they note the weakness of such an approach as the virus may invade the ‘safe’ camp, endangering its entire population and completely defeating its purpose. Real life data shows that most deaths with COVID-19 occured in care homes where there is a concentration of vulnerable individuals —easy prey for the ubiquitous virus.

The CDC warns that this optional incarceration of the vulnerable population may have detrimental effects, “ significant emotional distress, exacerbate existing mental illness or contribute to anxiety, depression, helplessness, grief, substance abuse, or thoughts of suicide.” 

Such camps are reminiscent of periods of our human civilization that should never be forgotten, lest they are repeated. 

“If it were possible for any nation to fathom another people’s bitter experience through a book, how much easier its future fate would become and how many calamities and mistakes it could avoid. But it is very difficult. There always is this fallacious belief: ‘It would not be the same here; here such things are impossible.’

Alas, all the evil of the twentieth century is possible everywhere on earth.” 

― Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago 1918–1956

Focused Protection

In October 2020, The Great Barrington Declaration (GBD) proposed a focused protection approach: “The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk”. This approach also promotes the voluntary shielding of the most vulnerable from contact with the rest of the population for the duration of an outbreak, by working online and having their groceries delivered or temporarily relocating the elderly living in multi-generational homes.

Although this approach is an improvement on the previous one, taking into account the detrimental consequences of self-isolation and allowing the vulnerable to meet their loved ones outdoors where transmission is almost nil, it raises the question of how it will be implemented effectively, especially in impoverished communities. Furthermore, it is based on the unrealistic assumption that it is possible to shield from a highly infectious virus. It imposes unfair requirements on care home staff and visitors such as testing multiple times per week using an invasive method that can be painful. The testing of asymptomatic individuals is very unlikely to yield any benefit as asymptomatic transmission is not a main driver of disease outbreaks – especially when PCR tests are used, which are unfit to diagnose infectiousness. They detect dead and active viral material alike, leading to the unnecessary quarantining of many healthy staff members. 

The GBD also recommends prioritizing vaccination against COVID-19 for high-risk individuals and their caregivers. Although vaccination of the first group is justified when the benefit of the intervention outweighs its risks for the individual, vaccination of the latter should only be based on the individual’s medical need for the intervention. Some took this recommendation as a justification for mandatory vaccination of caregivers to protect high-risk individuals. As recent studies have shown, the COVID-19 vaccines are not sterilizing, meaning they do not stop infection or transmission. Even if they were, healthcare workers should not be required to take the vaccines to protect others. Firstly, after a year and half of the pandemic, it is unlikely that there remain many healthcare workers who are not naturally immune and natural immunity is far superior to vaccine-induced immunity. Secondly, vaccines, as with any other medical intervention, come with (possibly severe) risks, and no one should be forced or pressured into having a potentially lethal intervention. Vaccines are supposed to protect the vaccinated and should be recommended based on individual net benefit.

Finally, the GBD recommends employing immune caregivers. This helps reduce the burden of disease among staff, but not among the vulnerable. There is no compelling scientific reason to select healthcare workers based on their immunity status (naturally immune, vaccinated, with cross-immunity from exposure to closely related viruses, or non-immune), as long as the rule of ‘don’t come to work if exhibiting the slightest viral respiratory symptoms’ is observed. Nosocomial transmission (infections acquired in hospitals or care homes) occurs mostly as a result of the ambient air containing a high viral load from other symptomatic patients, not from healthy non-symptomatic healthcare workers. Immunity status should not be grounds for discrimination in employment. 

Put Your Money Where Your Heart Is

Resources are better spent where they can make a real difference, instead of being squandered on the young and healthy. We need to start with the correct goal. The “Zero Covid” goal of eliminating transmission and eradicating the virus was always implausible and has proven impossible. SARS-CoV-2 spreads by aerosols and can remain suspended in the air for days. The correct goal should have been to reduce hospitalizations and deaths in the vulnerable population. 

If we begin by accepting that there is little we can do in the face of an airborne virus, we can focus our efforts while being mindful of not causing harm elsewhere.

PANDA proposed a number of recommendations in the Protocol for Reopening Society in December 2020 to facilitate a return to normal life. 

Below are some updated recommendations to reduce hospitalizations and deaths in the vulnerable which are not based on isolating them from the rest of the population. Social isolation leads to poor health outcomes and is counterproductive.

Recommendations For The Vulnerable:

1. Recommend that vulnerable persons avoid closed, poorly ventilated indoor spaces during peak outbreaks in order to reduce exposure to high viral loads.

2. Recommend that vulnerable persons stay away (not in the same room) from any person exhibiting viral respiratory symptoms until their symptoms subside (infectivity generally lasts 8 days and there is no need to wait for a negative PCR test as the results can remain inaccurately positive for up to 3 months).

3. Educate vulnerable individuals on the nature of airborne viruses, and the consequent ineffectiveness of measures such as masks, plexiglass screens and social distancing stickers. The wearing of masks by uninfected high-risk individuals leads to a false sense of safety. The wearing of masks by ill high-risk individuals is risky as it reduces their oxygen intake.

4. Encourage individuals to improve their health by leading a healthy lifestyle (staying away from processed food and staying active).

5. Provide prophylactic treatment (drugs, such as Ivermectin, and supplements, such as Vitamin D, C and Zinc) to high-risk groups ― in accordance with their physician’s recommendations― to prevent infection.

6. Offer the COVID-19 vaccines to high-risk individuals who are not recovered from COVID only when the benefits of the vaccines clearly outweigh their risks for the individual. Accurate and transparent information about the benefits (less than 1% absolute risk reduction from the virus) and the risks (unprecedented high level of adverse events) of the COVID-19 vaccines must be shared with the vulnerable prior to acquiring their informed consent. Under no circumstances should vaccination be mandatory for high-risk individuals.

7. Test symptomatic high-risk patients, both vaccinated and unvaccinated, promptly in order to inform their treatment.

8. Provide early treatment to high-risk patients, especially if they progress to the inflammatory stage, instead of adopting a wait-and-see approach. Early treatment is estimated to reduce hospitalisation by 88% and deaths by 75%.

9. Provide effective treatment to patients in the event of hospitalisation. This consists of antiviral drugs to slow the replication of the virus, anti-inflammatory drugs to reduce inflammation caused by the immune response and anticoagulants to prevent blood clotting.

10. Develop emotional support interventions for high-risk individuals to reduce their anxiety levels, and in turn mortality with COVID. A recent study shows that anxiety and fear-related disorders are the second strongest risk factor associated with death with COVID.

Recommendations For Communities:

1. Advise high-risk individuals to seek alternative temporary housing with a relative or friend if a member of their household presents with viral respiratory symptoms, until the symptoms subside and the home is well ventilated.

2. Move high-functioning elderly people out of care homes and into the community. Multi-generational homes may have a protective effect on the elderly, as children generally shed a very low viral load when infected, which acts like an inoculation or ‘natural vaccination’ for adults.

3. Allow low-risk individuals to acquire natural immunity for SARS-CoV-2 to protect the vulnerable. A recent study showed that immune members confer protection from infection to other members of their household. Given that natural immunity is broader and longer-lasting than non-sterilizing vaccine-induced immunity, and does not carry the risk of adverse events, it is the preferred route for low-risk individuals.

Recommendations For Health Institutions:

1. Dedicate well-isolated wards in specific hospitals to the treatment of COVID-19 patients to limit nosocomial transmission in all hospitals. This also facilitates more cost-effective use of resources and reduces the burden of disease among healthcare workers.

2. Create makeshift units outside care homes for elderly patients with COVID-19, to limit transmission to other vulnerable individuals.

3. Ensure that the ventilation systems in hospitals and care homes are optimal for reducing viral load in these facilities.

4. Ask staff and visitors of care homes and hospitals to stay away at the slightest symptom of respiratory illness or the sensation of becoming ill prior to the onset of symptoms (commonly referred to as ‘feeling like you are coming down with something’). This is a courtesy that the general public owes any vulnerable person in their community.

5. Convert redundant testing and vaccination centers into prophylactic or early treatment centers, since mass testing and mass vaccination are not justified.

While opinions on the correct protocols around SARS-CoV-2 are clearly varied, it is worth remembering that proponents on both sides of the debate have the same goal. We all want to reduce death, misery and harm while maintaining human dignity. How do we protect the vulnerable and move on with life? We respect their informed risk-benefit analysis, based on what they value most in life, and we support their decision. Do they value prolonging a solitary existence or do they value living life to the fullest? Each of these decisions has its own trade-offs. It is for each person to choose and not for society to decide what’s best for them. What we should never do is place anyone with a positive test or the unvaccinated in isolation camps, using immunity status as a condition of participation in society under the ‘noble’ pretext of protecting the vulnerable. This is the route to dismantling the fabric of our society and descending into tyranny. Our survival depends on us living together.

MASS PROTESTS erupt across America; even Biden voters now rejecting tyrannical vaccine mandates ... "Let's go Brandon" protest rap goes viral

Across America, even left-wing Biden voters in blue cities are now joining protests against vaccine mandates and Biden's heavy handed tactics that violate medical choice / human rights. Over just the last few days, we've seen protests by teachers in New York City, Boeing employees protesting in Seattle, Southwest Airlines workers protesting in Dallas, California parents protesting vaccines mandates in schools and a law enforcement revolt against coercive vaccine mandates in Chicago. "'We will not comply': protests against vaccine mandates erupt in progressive Seattle," reports the Post Millennial. Seattle saw protests on Monday after the city and state terminated fired an unprecedented number of workers who refused to comply with Governor Jay Inslee's vaccine mandate. The requirement went into effect at midnight on Oct. 18, by which time most people would have had to receive their first shot. The rally hosted by March For Freedom Washington brought out firefighters, law enforcement officers, nurses, teachers, and bus drivers to Seattle City Hall. The crowd met around noon and people gave their heartbreaking testimonies as to why they chose not to get vaccinated. On Sunday, the day before the deadline to submit vaccination status, Seattle police officers who would not comply took a strong stance and hung Gadsden flags from patrol vehicles. https://twitter.com/KatieDaviscourt/status/1449834381476913162 "I served as a firefighter for 23 years. I have seen things that you wouldn't wish on your greatest enemy. I never thought this is how my career would end," a Seattle firefighter told The Post Millennial. "Last year we were frontline heroes, this year we're enemies." Protests were also organized in Dallas, where Southwest Airlines employees were seen chanting, "Let's Go Brandon!" https://twitter.com/DrewHLive/status/1450108114964033541Unlike the engineered "protests" of Black Lives Matter and Antifa in 2020 -- all organized and funded by globalists like George Soros -- these health freedom protests are organic, genuine and attended by real people who show their faces and aren't hiding behind masks. "Protests are popping up all over the United States and things could get really ugly really quickly," writes Mac Slavo from SHTFplan.com. On Monday, hundreds of demonstrators held signs aloft that read, “Terminate the mandate,” “Freedom not force” and “No jabs for jobs,” as they convened at Southwest Airlines’ headquarters in Dallas to protest against the mandate. Attendees also chanted “My body, my choice” as they lined the highway outside the airline facility. https://twitter.com/RapidFire_Pod/status/1450106792642498573

Former Biden supporters are now chanting, "Let's Go Brandon!"

When campaigning in 2020, Biden told America he would never push vaccine mandates. His gullible supporters believed him and touted the progressive idea of, "my body my choice." But it didn't take long for Biden to betray his own voter base, declaring, "YOUR body, MY choice!" by pushing coercive, dangerous vaccine mandates. Trump is only slightly less offensive in all this, by the way, because he relentlessly pushes covid vaccines and is still trying to claim credit for bringing them into existence, but he says he wouldn't force them on people. Biden, on the other hand, is aggressively pushing vaccine mandates as a requirement to work. By doing so, he is exposing the real agenda of the radical Left -- complete tyranny and total government control over your body, your life and your behavior. For many "progressives," that's just too much to swallow, and they are pushing back like never before. In Australia, Premier Daniel Andrews is now threatening the DOUBLE vaxxed with being locked up if they don't agree to an endless series of "booster" shots (which really aren't boosters but rather contain full doses of more spike protein bioweapons). This should be a warning to all Americans: If you are foolish enough to comply with the first two vaccine shots, you will be forced to be injected with many more yet to come. As an increasing number of former Biden supporters are now discovering, you can't "comply" your way out of tyranny. At some point, you have to take a stand against it and engage in mass civil disobedience to reject the insanity. This is just the first step of the backlash, by the way. Soon, you'll hear a nationwide call for mass arrests of Biden and his regime cohorts for carrying out crimes against humanity. The war crimes tribunals won't be far behind, especially as vaccine deaths accelerate through the 2021-2022 winter (and all the dead bodies can't be covered up by the complicit media any longer).

Countdown to ZERO IMMUNITY... vaccine victims are seeing their immune response drop by about 5% each week, with long-term consequences mirroring AIDS

A bombshell report published by The Expose (UK) is entitled, "A comparison of official Government reports suggest the Fully Vaccinated are developing Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome." Since this is being instigated by vaccine injections, I'm calling it "Injected Immunodeficiency Syndrome," or "IIDS." As The Expose explains, following a detailed analysis of UK PHE Vaccine Surveillance data: Latest UK PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report figures on Covid cases show that doubly vaccinated 40-70 year olds have lost 40% of their immune system capability compared to unvaccinated people. Their immune systems are deteriorating at around 5% per week (between 2.7% and 8.7%). If this continues then 30-50 year olds will have 100% immune system degradation, zero viral defence by Christmas and all doubly vaccinated people over 30 will have lost their immune systems by March next year. According to the trend described by the current data, as The Expose adds: Everybody over 30 will have lost 100% of their entire immune capability (for viruses and certain cancers) within 6 months. 30-50 year olds will have lost it by Christmas. These people will then effectively have full blown acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and destroy the NHS. Booster shots further accelerate the destruction of the immune system, which explains why 90% of hospital admissions in at least one US hospitals were among vaccinated individuals, according to a new whistleblower who has stepped forward via The Highwire. With credit to TheHighWire.com, we have posted that whistleblower video here:

If the trend holds, the next six months will see a global wave of vaccine victims dying from cancer and common infections

The plunging immune response among vaccine victims means that fatalities from cancer -- and from common infections such as winter colds and flu -- are set to skyrocket over the next six months. It is a fully-functioning immune system, after all, that keeps cancer in check and prevents common wild-type pathogens from wreaking havoc across the body. Immune function is supported and enhanced by vitamin D, zinc and other critical nutrients, which is exactly why the pro-genocide media and so-called "science" journals attack nutrition (as well as ivermectin). A nutrient deficiency impairs immune function, which is why vitamin D deficient people tend to get sick far more frequently than others. And now, with vaccines literally destroying immune function by the week, we have the deliberate takedown of human immune function combined with nutritional deficiencies and artificial restrictions on medical interventions that might save lives. The only plausible explanation for all this is that the vaccines are, indeed, a depopulation weapon delivery system, and they function by destroying a victim's immune system, causing them to be killed by cancer or common infections. Just today, fully vaccinated Colin Powell died from covid, marking yet another post-vaccine victim of the depopulation agenda. As AIDS patients know very well, those individuals suffering from heavily suppressed immune function can be killed by low-level winter colds or flu pathogens that would normally pose no risk at all to a healthy person. Little did we know an AIDS-like weapon system would be loaded into needles and dishonestly called "vaccines" to fool the weak-minded and gullible. The evil genius in this depopulation plan is that vaccine-induced immune destruction deaths will never be attributed to the vaccine itself. Those who die from cancer after vaccines destroyed their immune system will be recorded as "cancer" deaths, not vaccine deaths. And those who die from common folds or influenza strains will be described as having been infected with "super flu" strains that will, of course, be blamed on the unvaccinated. Even if millions of Americans die over the next six months and hospitals are completely overrun, covid vaccines will never be tied to any vaccines whatsoever. The pharma-funded media will make sure of that.

Expect US hospitals to be in a full-blown staffing emergency by early 2022

Making matters even worse, nurses and hospital workers with natural immunity are right now being fired from their jobs for refusing to take spike protein injections. This is causing severe staffing shortages in some areas (such as New York), and we aren't even into the flu season yet. Once vitamin D levels plunge during the darker, cold weather months of December, January and February, we are very likely to see hospitals in a staffing panic at exactly the same time the wave of immune-compromised vaccine victims kicks in. Watch for the lying corporate media to run with the hospital crisis stories, claiming, "people are dying because selfish anti-vaxxers won't take their vaccines!" But in reality, it will be the vaccinated who will be dying from their own suicide shots, since allowing yourself to be injected with a deadly biological weapon spike protein nanoparticle isn't exactly a wise strategy for lasting health. The upshot is that the covid plandemic really is a global depopulation scheme, and the hysteria about covid was designed to drive people into accepting the very vaccines that are destroying their immune function and plunging them into near-certain death. The next six months will reveal mass death across the Northern hemisphere, even as the war criminals pushing these deadly vaccines double down on their genocidal demands. The reason why they want 100% of the public to be vaccinated is so that there is no control group to compare against the vaccinated. As long as a control group of unvaxxed people exists, the mortality associated with vaccine injections cannot be swept under the rug. In fact, as Alex Berenson is now reporting, there are excess post-vaccine deaths in Scotland as well as across Germany.

Hear the full podcast for full details on this and other breaking news

In today's especially informative podcast, I cover China's hypersonic missile test claims, why the US Navy now wants to charge soldiers for their training costs, Australia's insane anti-biker laws that criminalize tattoos, and supply chain shortages that are seeing public schools beg parents to keep their kids at home because the schools have no more food. Oh, the joy of living under socialism! America is, indeed, rapidly becoming Venezuela... Get all the full details here: Brighteon.com/d77aa6dd-2fee-4df9-8dc3-1467d30ebaeaDiscover a new podcast each day at: https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport And be sure to watch my daily interviews at Brighteon.TV at 2:00 pm central time. We have amazing interviews all this week.

American farmers are having trouble finding replacement tractor tires amid escalating supply chain woes

A new and unexpected problem has emerged in America's collapsing supply chain that is making it close to impossible for some farmers to continue growing food. Spare tires for tractors are now in dangerously short supply thanks to the government's never-ending Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) fascism. For whatever reason, critical farming equipment and parts are either not getting produced anymore or not getting delivered to where they need to be, leaving farmers across the heartland in a major bind. "You try to baby your equipment, but we're all at the mercy of luck right now," says Cordt Holub, a fourth-generation corn and soybean farmer in Buckingham, Ia, who now locks his machinery up inside his barn every night after thieves robbed hard-to-find tractor parts from a local Deere & Co. dealership. Tractor tires, semiconductors and other vital components needed in the industrial farming sector are just not available like they once were, which threatens the ability of farmers to not only continue planting food but also harvesting it. When equipment or machinery breaks, many farmers are now having to scramble to find some kind of workaround. Local welders and mechanics are often called on to try to rig something up just to get the job done, even if it is not a long-term solution to the problem. Because machine tires have become so difficult to find, growers looking to buy used equipment are also asking for close-up photos of the tires to see how much tread is left. Those that are bare are often skipped over in favor of something newer. "As harvest ends, we will see farmers at equipment auctions not for the machinery – but for parts," says Greg Peterson, founder of the Machinery Pete website, which hosts farm equipment auctions. "We're already hearing from guys talking about buying a second planter or sprayer, just for parts."

Is the American government intentionally trying to starve out the country?

Before the Fauci Flu was even a thing, the American government was already targeting the farming sector with obliteration by forcing tractor manufacturers to start building the machines with built-in obsolescence. Much like a smartphone that turns into a "brick" after a certain number of software upgrades, the tractor industry was told by Big Brother that all new tractors must be made virtually impossible to fix. This forces farmers to have to keep buying new tractors, assuming they can find any. Fast-forward to now and it seems obvious that this is a planned destruction of the farming sector. It is unclear how much longer the charade can go on before the entire industry collapses, leaving Americans starving without food. Even irrigation supplies are in short supply, which means some farmers are no longer able to get water to their crops. Keep in mind that much of the country is still suffering under historic drought conditions. "We were in the middle of a drought up here," says Rami Warburton, who owns a small welding shop in western Washington. Warburton says that she and her husband Bob have barely been able to keep up with all the orders coming from farmers who need something repaired, whether it be new fittings for irrigation systems or a new bucket for a bulldozer. "At that time, they couldn't wait to water their fields for a month. The crops will be dead by then." Since most products used in America these days come from China, all thanks to the globalist policies that Americans have been voting in for decades, the supply chain can now be easily weaponized, which is clearly what is happening. The latest news about the engineered collapse of the global economy due to "covid" can be found at Collapse.news. Sources for this article include: Reuters.com NaturalNews.com

Proof that the CDC is lying to the world about COVID vaccine safety

The CDC and the FDA claim that we can safely ignore the huge spike in event rates reported to the VAERS system this year (this is the official adverse event reporting system relied on by the FDA and CDC to spot safety signals). In their view, there is “nothing to see” in the death chart below. They claim that the propensity to report (PTR) is much higher this year and that all the events (with the exception of a few) are all simply reporting background events that were not caused by the vaccines. 

There’s just one tiny little problem with that explanation: there is a CDC paper that proves that they are lying. Big time.

I will show below that even if we believed everything they said, it can’t explain all the deaths and severe adverse events. The data simply doesn’t fit their hypothesis. At all.

The reality is the vaccines are extremely dangerous, they kill more than they save for every age range (it’s worse the younger you are), and they should be halted immediately, not green lighted like the FDA committee just did. All vaccine mandates should be rescinded.

The CDC paper

In a nutshell, there is a paper written by five CDC authors, The reporting sensitivity of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) for anaphylaxis and for Guillain-Barré syndrome, that was published a year ago in the peer-reviewed scientific literature.

The paper claims that serious adverse events in the past have been under-reported by at most a factor of 8.3 (known as the under-reporting factor (URF)).

This means that in the best possible scenario, where there is full reporting (i.e., where the URF=1 and the PTR, defined as the avg URF/current URF, is 8.3), a reporting rate of serious adverse events that is 8.3X higher than the previous reporting rate for that symptom could be safely ignored as simply due to a higher propensity to report the naturally occurring rate of background events.

While theoretically you could have a URF of <1, this is unlikely since the HHS verifies all records before they are put in the database and eliminates duplicates. There are mistakes that happen but they are minor, e..g, we know of 2 gamed records out of the 1.6M VAERS reports. So the minimum URF would be 1 and it would be nearly impossible to achieve from a practical standpoint.

Here’s the problem. This year, with the COVID vaccines, there are a huge number of serious adverse events that are reported at a rate that is more than 8.3X higher than previous years. In fact, nearly every serious event I investigated was elevated from previous years by significantly more than this. I documented this in an important video on VAERS serious adverse event reports that I hope everyone will watch. 

Unfortunately, none of the people at the FDA, CDC, or on their respective outside committees has ever watched that video. If they did, they would immediately realize the enormous mistakes that have been made and I’m sure take corrective action. 

But cognitive dissonance prevents them from watching the video. I think the only way to force them to watch the video would be to physically strap them in a chair and put clamps on their eyes as was done in the movie “A Clockwork Orange.”

How do you explain the rates of pulmonary embolism?

The most stunning serious adverse event I found was pulmonary embolism (PE). 

As I show in the video, the average annual number of reports of PE per year in VAERS for all vaccines was 1.4. So we’d expect to see at most 11.6 PE events this year according to the belief system of the FDA and CDC. Well, one tiny little problem: with the COVID vaccines, there were 1,131 reports, nearly a 100-fold increase over the “best case” scenario. Please watch the video on VAERS serious adverse event reports to see this for yourself. 

Also, for those suffering from “cognitive dissonance syndrome” (this is a common affliction of people who think the vaccines are safe), the increase in reports isn’t due to increased rates of vaccination either as we explain in this paper which shows historical vaccination rates among various age groups. 

In other words, even if you totally buy the bullshit argument of the FDA and CDC (which they never justified with analysis or data) that the URF=1 this year, it still means that 99% of the reports of pulmonary embolism (PE) are unexplainable. They must be caused by “something” and that something has to be very big and it has to be correlated with the administration of the vaccine because the PE reporting rate was correlated with the vaccine administration.

If these PE events weren’t caused by the vaccine, then what caused them? 

Nobody can explain that. Nobody even attempts to explain it. Nobody even wants to talk about it.

But since the mainstream media and fact checkers are completely tone deaf to safety reports, they never ask the question. They never will. It would explode the whole false narrative. 

We kill 15 people to maybe save 1. Are we nuts?

Furthermore, if we use the same methodology as used by the CDC in their paper to determine the actual underreporting factor for this year, but we use a much more accurate reference, we find that the best estimate for the minimum URF is 41. For less serious events you’d use a higher number since healthcare workers and consumers are far less likely to report less serious events. So using 41 is always “safe” in that it will not overestimate any event.

This means that we’ve killed well over 150,000 Americans so far, and all of those deaths had to be caused by the vaccine because there is simply no other explanation that fits all the facts. See this paper for the details. The paper also details 7 other ways that the number was validated and none of those methods used the VAERS data at all. This makes it impossible for anyone to credibly attack the analysis. Nobody wants to debate us on this.

And Pfizer’s own Phase 3 study showed that we save only 1 COVID death for every 22,000 people we vaccinate (you have to see Table S4 in the supplement to learn that 2 people died from COVID who were unvaccinated and 1 person died from COVID who got the vaccine, so a net savings of 1 life).

We have fully vaccinated almost 220M Americans which means we may save an estimated 10,000 lives from COVID per the Pfizer study which is the most definitive data we have (since “real scientists” ONLY trust the data in the double-blind randomized controlled trials). 

Yet the VAERS data shows we killed over 150,000 Americans from the vaccine to achieve that goal. 

In other words, we killed 15 people for every COVID life we might save.

But it’s worse than that because the Pfizer study was done pre-Delta. The Pfizer vaccine was developed for Alpha variant and is less effective against Delta. So our numbers are even more extreme.

This means of course that the FDA, CDC, and their outside committees are all incompetent in their ability to spot safety signals. They couldn’t even spot the death safety signal. It also means that the vaccine mandates are immoral and unethical.

Inconvenient truth: vaccine-induced myocarditis is neither rare or mild

When we apply the proper URF to the myocarditis data, we find that myocarditis goes from a “rare” event to a common event.

Using data from the CDC and applying the correct URF, for 16 year-old boys, the rate of myocarditis is 1 in 317 as we can see from this slide from our All you need to know deck. That’s not rare. That’s a train wreck.

Also, as far as the myocarditis being “mild” that’s bullshit too. According to the cardiologists I talked to such as Peter McCullough, there is no such thing as mild myocarditis. Anytime you have an event that puts a teenager in the hospital, that’s problematic. In fact, as we show in All you need to know, troponin levels can rise to extreme levels and stay elevated for months. Troponin is a marker of heart damage. Unlike a heart attack, the levels are much higher and they stay elevated for much longer. The damage that is done is usually permanent and it may lead to loss of life within 5 years. Of course nobody knows the death rate in 5 years. We’ll find out in 5 years. Our kids are enrolled in the clinical trial of this by getting vaccinated, but we don’t notify the parents of this. And the kids are clueless because the doctors tell them it is safe. They believe the doctors. The doctors believe the CDC. And the CDC was lying. And now the CDC simply doesn’t want to talk to us about it. I get that.

There are thousands of elevated events

It’s not just a few symptoms that are elevated. There are thousands of them. If they don’t kill you, you can be disabled for life, even after you use the right drugs to rid yourself of the damaging effects of the vaccines. 

Here are the pills taken daily by a friend of mine (a former top nurse at one of the top medical schools in the US) who has been injured for life from the vaccine and cannot work (she’s a single mom).

Medication and supplements taken before vaccine injury: 0

Compensation received from the US government for her injuries: 0

Censorship has replaced scientific debate

This is embarrassing for everyone: the CDC, FDA, Congress, mainstream media, and the medical community. This is why nobody will debate me and my team of experts in an open debate. Because nobody wants to face the fact that they were wrong.

The public wants a debate. It’s overwhelming. I’ve never seen such a lopsided survey result in my life:

But nobody supporting the false narrative will debate us. These people are not accountable to public opinion. They are all driven by what Biden wants. And Biden wants to inject us. All of us.

TrialSiteNews made this public call for a debate; nobody responded. They even reached out to Pfizer and they refused to debate. We weren’t surprised.

Of course they won’t debate. They never will. Here’s why:

So censorship and ad hominem attacks are the preferred method for disputing what I wrote in this article and my other articles because nobody is able to attack the data or our methodology in a live debate with a neutral moderator.

It’s not just me of course. There are dozens of respected scientists, doctors, and statisticians who agree with me (see slide 82 TFNT #1: COVID vaccines have killed over 200,000 Americans for a partial list). 

Summary

The FDA and CDC are caught between a rock and a hard place as I explain in my video on the VAERS statistics. They cannot reveal the true URF and PTR because that would put them in hot water; it would be an admission that they got it totally wrong on the myocarditis data and everything else. 

So they have to lie and claim the current URF=1 so that the PTR is maximized at 8.3. But then they have a huge problem because adverse events like death and pulmonary embolism are impossible to explain. 

So they are in a no win situation. To play out the game, they avoid being questioned and simply refuse to answer. They are like a magician using misdirection. We are told to focus on all the lives being saved and to pay no attention to the man behind the curtain (i.e., all the deaths and disabilities).

For more information on vaccine safety, please check out my comprehensive vaccine safety slide deck, All you need to know. I am pleased to report that it has been used successfully to reverse vaccine mandates. At least some people are listening.

The good news is far more people are speaking out and moving to the anti-vaccine camp. The numbers keep growing every day.

It will be interesting to see how long the medical community can keep up the charade. The longer they resist, the worse it will be when this house of cards comes tumbling down.

Accumulating Preclinical Evidence Turmeric Inhibits SARS-CoV-2—German Study

German infectious disease, virologist, and microbiologist research specialists led by Albert Krawczyk, Ph.D. from University of Essen’s West German Centre of Infectious Diseases as well as University Hospital Essen’s Institute for Virology and team sought to investigate if herbal medicines with known antiviral properties had any meaningful impact on SARS-CoV-2, the virus behind COVID-19. One such target is turmeric root, used by Asian societies for cooking as well as in herbal medicine for thousands of years. It turns out the herb’s bioactive ingredient called curcumin exhibits a broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity according to the German scientists. In a recent study, the team tested the antiviral activities of “aqueous turmeric root extract, the dissolved content of a curcumin-containing nutritional supplement capsule, and pure curcumin against SARS-CoV-2.” The author’s recap that in a series of the early state, preclinical lab experiments using cell cultures (VERO E6 and human Calu-3) supernatants, turmeric root extract, dissolved turmeric capsule content, as well as pure curcumin successfully neutralize the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 at subtoxic levels.

Pedigreed German Research Institutes

The German researchers represent prominent institutions including the University of Essen School of Medicine, the University Hospital Essen, Institute of Virology, Ruhr University Bochum, Department of Molecular and Medical Virology, School of Medicine as well as the Department of Molecular Biochemistry, Cell Signaling, and the University Hospital, LMU Munich’s Institute of Psychiatric Phenomics and Genomics (IPPG).

What follows is a brief description of the herb, its history, and use followed by a summary of the study and findings. 

Turmeric Root Background

Used for thousands of years as a complementary treatment of several diseases, its bioactive ingredients were first studied in the early 19th century. For example, by 1815 according to the authors, scientists such as Vogel and Pelletier isolated the turmeric root and identified the bioactive ingredient curcumin.

Known as Curcuma longa, the herb Turmeric root is broadly used as a spice in Southeast Asia where it also happens to be broadly cultivated. Of note, the rhizome of Curcuma longa consists of several structurally related curcuminoids. The authors shared that anywhere from 60% to 75% of the curcuminoid content is made of up curcumin which also goes by the name diferuloylmethane. The authors share that the remaining fraction includes combinations of diferuloylmethane (20-25%) and bisdemethoxycurcumin (5-15%).

In reviewing the herb’s properties, the authors refer to a number of studies indicating a broad spectrum of bioactivities including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antitumor, and hepatoprotective activities.

Turmeric & SARS-CoV-2 Research Cases

Several research teams have studied the use of turmeric as a possible agent to inhibit SARS-CoV-2. Recently, Brazilian researchers investigated the use of turmeric as an inhibiting force against the novel coronavirus. They looked to determine if the ingredient curcumin could potentially represent a new adjuvant therapy for COVID-19 therapy. Published in the peer review Frontiers in Pharmacology the researchers studied how the agent could “interfere at different times/points during the infection caused by SARS-CoV-2.”

Indian researchers have also investigated the use of curcumin as a possible adjuvant therapy targeting SARS-CoV-2. In a recently published piece in Frontiers of Pharmacology research scientists from a handful of medical centers in India provided information in the article “Oral Curcumin With Piperine as Adjuvant Therapy for the Treatment of COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.” 

For the randomized controlled trial, a 30-bed dedicated COVID-Health Center (DCHC) in Maharashtra served as the participating trial site center. The study protocol called for two groups including 1) a study group of patients that received curcumin (525 mg) with piperine (2.5 mg) in a tablet form twice a day and 2) a control group that received a dose of probiotics twice a day.

The study team reported in the peer review journal that “patients with mild to moderate, and severe symptoms who received curcumin/piperine treatment showed early symptomatic recovery” meaning COVID-19 symptoms such as fever, cough, sore throat breathlessness were reduced faster.

The study team also found that participants in the study group generally fared better with “Less deterioration, fewer red flag signs, better ability to maintain oxygen saturation above 94% on room air, and better clinical outcomes compared to patients of the control group.”  They also found that the study drug reduced the duration of hospitalization.

German Preclinical Study Team Findings

The German study team found that the turmeric compounds “effectively neutralized SARS-CoV-2 at subtoxic concentrations in Vero E6 and human Calu-3 cells.”

Additionally, the preclinical, early-stage lab research provides some evidence that “curcumin treatment significantly reduced SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels in cell culture supernatants.” Contributing to an accumulating trove of data, the German team indicates that curcumin represents a “promising compound for complementary COVID-19 treatment.”

Assuming randomized controlled trials replicate and verify the findings the authors post that an adjuvant therapy represents a compelling opportunity to help care for patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, particularly the mild-to-moderate home care cases—represents the vast majority (90%+) of cases.

Lead Research/Investigator

Albert Krawczyk, Ph.D. University of Essen’s West German Centre of Infectious Diseases as well as University Hospital Essen, Institute for Virology, Corresponding Author

Call to Action: The authors recommend the design of randomized controlled trials to “vigorously test the effectiveness of complementary treatment of COVID-19 patients with curcumin-containing products.”  Follow the link to read the entire study in the peer review Swiss journal MDPI. 

Inventor of mRNA technology argues against vaccine-risk censorship, offers a dynamic approach to combatting COVID-19

Dr. Robert Malone has over 30 years of experience as an internationally recognized scientist of virology, immunology, and molecular biology. Malone holds numerous fundamental patents in those respective fields. His ground-breaking contribution to the development of the mRNA technologies give him an insightful perspective on the role of emerging vaccines in the fight against COVID-19. Recently, Malone had a conversation at the Global COVID Summit, to explain these ideas.

Good Science and Medicine Should Welcome Open Discussion of Risks

While the COVID-19 vaccines play an important role during this pandemic, Malone finds it problematic to censor necessary (and previously customary) medical discussions regarding potential risks, evolving data, and other promising treatment options.

Though Malone acknowledges the severity of the COVID-19 virus, that doesn’t compromise his standards when it comes to upholding the ethics surrounding the development of new vaccines.

“Full disclosure of risks,” is the “fundamental pillar of bioethics” which must be communicated to the public in a way they can understand, says Malone. Individuals must be “free, unencumbered, and non-coerced.” In this manner, people can willfully consent to the experimental medical procedure.  “I feel ethically bound to say no, this isn’t right.”

“We are in the middle of the largest experiment on human beings that has ever been performed…” says Malone. A new vaccine being administered to an enormous portion of the world population should be a reason to exercise more caution.

One main reason Malone is advocating for more selective-vaccine intake is those troublesome, evasive variants.

COVID Variants: A Dynamic Virus Calls for a Dynamic Strategy

Data on COVID-19 is evolving as rapidly as the virus itself.  World health organizations that rely on firmly established data are “making decisions that are totally inappropriate during the dynamic environment of an outbreak,” says Malone, since firmly established data is usually about six months behind.

Thankfully, other key players in science and medicine still embrace the concept of exploring newly emerging data on vaccine performance, potential risks, and perplexing variants, to better understand and overcome COVID-19.  

Geert Vanden Bossche, for example, is a leading advocate for the theory that variants of COVID-19 are being produced through vaccination. “I highly respect his insight,” says Malone.

“Viruses that have evolved to escape vaccine effects, will only do so in response to having reproduced and been selected in the body of people who have received the vaccine. This is fundamental Darwinian evolution,” says Malone.

Developing variants were tracked “largely in geographic regions and the time when the vaccine was being selectively deployed for clinical trials. Then, when we introduced the mass vaccination event, the divergents and evolution of those variants explode.”

The difference in the efficacy regarding how traditional live-attenuated vaccines work, (such as Polio, Yellow Fever, and Smallpox,) as opposed to mRNA vaccines, is that the former are administered prior to a major outbreak, preventing opportunity to spread.

“But once the virus is already embedded into a large fraction of the population, that logic fails.” Ultimately, vaccinating during an outbreak drives more potent mutations.

Another advantage of traditional vaccines is that they express a robust variety of proteins to attack the virus. In comparison, mRNA and adenovirus vaccines use the same basic gene-therapy technology with the exact single-antigen protein: spike.

“Logically what we’re doing is driving the development of viruses that can escape the immune surveillance associated with the spike.”

This explains why natural immunity proves to be 10 to 20 times more powerful than vaccine immunity. “The data shows this clearly,” says Malone. Therefore, vaccinating people who have recovered from COVID-19 does not make sense from a scientific, immunological perspective. Yet, world health leaders ignore this information.

Potential Dangers to Reproductive Health

The CDC website discloses the fact that no studies were ever conducted on pregnant or breastfeeding women. Additionally, in the interest of time, the FDA bypassed several rounds of rigorous animal testing to screen for toxicity in vital organs.

However, studies from Japan (in rodent testing) revealed that the synthetic chemical responsible for driving the vaccine, “accumulates paradoxically in the ovaries,” says Malone.

For this reason, Malone says world health organizations should be transparent that risks to reproductive health are unknown, as opposed to saying they are definitively safe. “I object to this.”

The native spike protein of the virus is a toxin, but to a lesser degree, so is the vaccine. Both can open the blood-brain barrier and producing coagulation.

Potential complications during pregnancy may occur because the uterus and the placenta are very vascular organs. If micro-coagulation (small blood clots) develops all over these areas, it has the potential to disrupt the oxygen and food supply. This can lead to a multitude of complications with fetal development: spontaneous abortion, disruption of physical and neurological development, as well as posing additional risks to the mother.

However, it is important to note, that the virus itself can create the same problems, and probably to a more severe degree. Those risks should be weighed by the patient and their OB.

Here are Malone’s recommendations for family planning and risk mitigation during the pandemic:

Find “a physician who is willing to give early treatment in case of infection.”

For women who feel that the vaccine is still appropriate, (or mandated) get your doses before becoming pregnant.

Already pregnant? Quarantine during first and second trimesters, then vaccinate during the third trimester, or after delivery. Since mRNA products are shed in breastmilk, parents must consider the unknown risk as to how this will affect infant development.

Malone’s Multi-Pronged Approach to Combatting COVID-19

Vaccines for those who need it

The limited supply of vaccines should be given to those who are most at-risk around the globe: the elderly, the immunocompromised, and the morbidly obese. Though the vaccines are not perfect, it is most valuable for these groups.

Preventative drug treatments for the general population

With promising new drugs, combinations, and treatments emerging, those need to be utilized (instead of discouraged) to keep people from hospitalization.

Introduce easily accessible home testing

At-home testing should be more accessible because it can speed up the time to get the necessary medication while helping those with a contagious infection to keep from spreading it to others.

Empower people with tools to overcome fear

“We need to have a way so that people can get a realistic assessment of what is their true risk, as opposed to what they fear based on the media. People are being driven crazy.” Malone references online apps that can help determine your risk to make an informed, rational decision.

Our Future with COVID-19

“The Director of the WHO fully concedes we cannot overcome this virus. This virus is going to be part of the human population for the rest of our lives…” says Malone. “Then let’s be intelligent about it. Let’s be strategic and tactical, and use all the tools that we have, and make sure we apply them in the right way.”

“We should practice medicine based on the individual, and their risks, and their health. We should empower people to make decisions, not to dictate to them about what those decisions should be.”